The present invention relates generally to integrated circuit devices and, more particularly, to a non-volatile, piezoelectronic memory based on piezoresistive strain produced by piezoelectric remanence.
Complementary Field Effect Transistors (FETs) support the standard computer architecture (CMOS) currently used in logic and memory. FETs exploit high channel mobility to control few-carrier currents electrostatically. However, limitations in this highly successful technology are appearing at current and future device scales. In particular, the inability to operate with power supplies significantly below 1 volt (V) limits device speed because faster clock speeds imply unacceptably high power consumption. Thus, it would be highly desirable to develop new switches and memories enabling computer architectures operable at low voltages/powers and high speeds.
In an exemplary embodiment, a nonvolatile memory storage device, includes a ferroelectric (FE) material coupled with a piezoresistive (PR) material through an inherent piezoelectric response of the FE material, wherein an electrical resistance of the PR material is dependent on a compressive stress applied thereto, the compressive stress caused by a remanent strain of the FE material resulting from a polarization of the FE material, such that a polarized state of the FE material results in a first resistance value of the PR material, and a depolarized state of the FE material results in a second resistance value of the PR material.
In another embodiment, a nonvolatile memory cell includes a storage transistor coupled to an access transistor, the storage transistor comprising a first ferroelectric (FE) material coupled with a first piezoresistive (PR) material through an inherent piezoelectric response of the first FE material, wherein an electrical resistance of the first PR material is dependent on a compressive stress applied thereto, the compressive stress caused by a remanent strain of the first FE material resulting from a polarization of the first FE material, such that a polarized state of the first FE material results in a first resistance value of the first PR material, and a depolarized state of the FE material results in a second resistance value of the first PR material that is higher than the first resistance value, wherein the first FE material is disposed between first and second electrodes, and the first PR material is disposed between the second electrode and a third electrode; wherein the first FE material is polarized by initial application of a voltage across the first FE material to result in an initial polarization Ds, and thereafter by removal of the voltage to leave the first FE element with a remanent polarization Dr and a remanent strain Sr; and wherein the first FE material is depolarized and the remanent strain removed by applying an alternating voltage of decreasing amplitude across the first FE material.
In another embodiment, a multibit, nonvolatile memory storage device includes a first ferroelectric (FE) material and a second FE material coupled with a piezoresistive (PR) material through an inherent piezoelectric response of the first FE material and second FE material, and arranged in a single stack, wherein an electrical resistance of the PR material is dependent upon on a compressive stress applied thereto, the compressive stress caused by a remanent strain of the first FE material and the second FE material resulting from a polarization of the first FE material and a polarization of the second FE material such that the PR material is set to assume one of a first resistance value, a second resistance value, a third resistance value of the PR material, and a fourth resistance value.
Referring to the exemplary drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
Disclosed herein are embodiments of a non-volatile, ferroelectric memory having a piezoresistive read capability (FePZRAM) which makes the device compatible with piezoelectronic, low-voltage switching technology. Referring initially to
The FE element 102 is disposed between a gate contact (electrode) 106 and a common contact 108, and the PR element 104 is disposed between the common contact 108 and a sense contact 110. A high yield strength medium serves as a mechanical clamp 112 around the memory structure. As further illustrated in
The ferroelectric element 102 is operated in two states. First, in a “Bit 1” state, the FE element 102 is polarized in a direction parallel to the z-axis, and thus is elongated along the same axis. In a “Bit 0” state, the FE element 102 is unpolarized, and thus not elongated. The FE 102 is polarized (as shown in the graph of
In an alternative embodiment, the FE element 102 may be placed in an imprinted state, as shown in the graph of
An exemplary switching time for the FE element 102 may be on the order of 10's of picoseconds (ps) for a thin FE film and voltages on the order of several tens of millivolts (mV). Switching occurs by the motion of a domain wall at the speed v=2.4×10−4E·m/s for an electric field E in V/m. For V=0.05 V and thickness L=30 nm (
When polarized, the expansive strain acting on the FE element 102 is used to compress the PR element 104, which is in contact with the FE element 102, and constrained by the surrounding rigid clamp 112 to cause compression rather than expansion of the whole structure. The compression of the PR element 104 due to the “Bit 1” polarization of the FE element 102 is used to provide a piezoresistive read signal through the sense and common contacts 110, 108.
Referring now to
An approximate expression for the stress in the PR due to the polarization-induced strain in the FE is:
Here, TPR is the stress in the PR, S(p) is the remanent strain in the FE due to polarization p, the dimensions and areas (l, L, a and A) are as described in
TPR=0.727 GPa.
Referring to the exemplary PR response in
Referring now to
In brief, the 4-terminal PET T2 includes a piezoelectric (PE) crystal material in lieu of the FE material of the storage transistor T1. In addition, instead of being disposed between a gate electrode and a common electrode, the PE material of T2 is disposed between a pair of gate electrodes. A low permittivity insulator layer (not shown) separates the one gate electrode from a first sense electrode. Effectively, the common electrode of the 3-terminal configuration is split into a second gate electrode and second sense electrode for a 4-terminal configuration. Additional details concerning 4-terminal PET devices may be found in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/719,965, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The memory element 500 is coupled to a pair of control lines, b (bit line) 502 and w (word line) 504. The gate electrode (g1) and the sense electrode (s1) of the ferroelectric PET (FPET) storage transistor T1 are coupled to ground. The common electrode (c1) of the FPET storage transistor T1 is coupled to a first sense electrode (s2a) of the 4PET access transistor T2, while a second sense electrode (s2b) of the 4PET access transistor T2 is coupled to the bit line 502. A first gate electrode (g2a) of the 4PET access transistor T2 is coupled to the word line 504, and a second gate electrode (g2b) of the 4PET access transistor T2 is coupled to ground. A switch 506 may be included in the peripheral logic to couple to separate read (sense) and write voltages (Vs, Vw) for the bit line b. The switch 506 may also be implemented using a PET device in lieu of an FET device. Internally, the gate electrode (g1) of FPET T1 is connected to one side of the FE capacitor, with the other side of the capacitor representing the common electrode (c1). The resistor symbol of FPET T1 represents the PR material connected between the common and sense contacts.
In a write mode of operation, the switch 506 uncouples the bit line 502 from the small sense voltage source Vs and couples the bit line 502 to a write voltage source V. To write a 1 to the storage transistor T1, the voltage on the word line 504 is raised to H to turn T2 ON. A constant write voltage H is also applied to the bit line 502 to polarize the FE material of the storage transistor T1, and is thereafter turned off. To write a 0 to the storage transistor T1, the applied write voltage on the bit line 502 is an oscillatory voltage (symbolized by ˜ in
Memory matrix operation defines conditions on PET design. To detect the ON state, the condition R2,ON<<R1,ON<<R1,OFF would be desirable. To detect a 1 bit in an enabled row, which is a row with T2 in the low-resistance state, R2,on, the resistance in T1, which is R1,on, must be less than the parallel sum of all the off resistances in the T2 4 PETS that are in the other rows. In this way, the current through the bit to be read dominates the combined leakage current from the other rows. If N is the number of rows, then this readability condition is R1,on<<R2,off/N.
Leakage current through the piezoelectric, which is nominally a capacitor, should be minimized to avoid excessive energy dissipation. The leakage current through a PMN-PT piezoelectric with an electric field of 4×106 V/m equals 10−5 A/cm2. This value is also expected for a design where the applied voltage is about 0.1 V and the PE thickness is about 25 nm. With a leakage current of 10−5 A/cm2 for each PET, a memory with 109 PETs, each with an area of (30 nm)2, has a total leakage current of 10−7 A, or a total leakage power of 10−8 Watts. This is negligible compared to the other power dissipated.
Referring now to
Each memory element 802 shown in
Referring again to
The read operation is implemented by first setting all of the bottom ferroelectrics in a row, FEb, to a polarized state, thereby compressing the PR halfway. Each FEb in the non-read rows remains unpolarized. A small voltage E is then applied to the top word line wt(n) for row n, and the bit lines are set to zero voltage with a current sensor. Current runs through each PR in the row to be read and then to the sensors in the bit lines, but significant current does not run through the other rows because their resistances are high. A top ferroelectric FEt that is polarized compresses the PR the other half of the way, dropping its resistance significantly so that a large current is read by that bit line sensor. A top ferroelectric FEt that is unpolarized does not compress the PR any more than the bottom FEb already compresses it, and therefore the PR resistance remains high. The current through that PR is therefore low in the bit line sensor. In this way, the states of polarization in all of the FEts in a row can be simultaneously determined by the sensors. This read operation is non-destructive because FEt is unchanged by the small applied voltage ε.
The standby state for all of the word lines and bit lines is zero voltage. The top ferroelectric, FEt, keeps its polarization state with zero voltage, and thus the memory is non-volatile. It should also be noted that the bottom FEb in each element could be replaced by a piezoelectric that requires a continuously applied voltage during the read-row step to compress the PR.
Referring now to
In Table 1, Δl is the intrinsic length expansion of the FE1+FE2 stack under different polarization combinations, with Δl0 being the expansion for FE2. Given the exponential behavior of resistivity vs. stress/strain in the PR characteristic graph of
An exemplary cross-point array 1100 for the multibit memory element 1000 of
Referring now to
In order to produce four different logic states in a nonvolatile manner, the piezo materials for FE layers 1202-1 and 1202-2 are selected to be different from one another. In addition, and as illustrated collectively by
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No.: N66001-11-C-4109 awarded by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2782397 | Young | Feb 1957 | A |
3138726 | Samuelson | Jun 1964 | A |
3740118 | Land et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
4419598 | Spitz et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4589009 | Motamedi | May 1986 | A |
5060191 | Nagasaki et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5231326 | Echols | Jul 1993 | A |
5673220 | Gendlin | Sep 1997 | A |
5760675 | Lee et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796298 | Kearney et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5872372 | Lee et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5883419 | Lee et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5938612 | Kline-Schoder et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6083762 | Papen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6392934 | Saluel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6548942 | Panasik | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6683803 | Gudesen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7193283 | Park | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208786 | Chu | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221579 | Krusin-Elbaum et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7253488 | Zhan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7394089 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411818 | Elmegreen et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7709317 | Yang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7848135 | Elmegreen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7968945 | Lolivier et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7973350 | Collonge et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7999440 | Miller et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8003427 | Faraone et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004154 | Cueff et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8125121 | Honda | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8159854 | Elmegreen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8247947 | Elmegreen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8405279 | Elmegreen et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8552621 | Piazza et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8598039 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8604670 | Mahameed et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20060054926 | Lahreche | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070235784 | Krusin-Elbaum et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080289417 | Okada | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090026890 | Goat et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100073997 | Elmegreen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100328984 | Elmegreen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110133603 | Elmegreen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120135590 | Hendrix et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130009668 | Elmegreen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130020908 | Pott et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036827 | Besling | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130043767 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140169078 | Elmegreen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
D. Balma, et al., “High Piezoelectric Longitudinal Coefficients in Sol-gel PZT Thin Film Multilayers,” Jornal of the American Ceramic Society, 2013, pp. 1-31. |
J. C. Crawford, “A Ferroelectric-Piezoelectric Random Access Memory,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 18, No. 10, 1971, pp. 951-958. |
F.F.C. Duval et al.; “High Frequency PZT Composite Thick Film Resonators;” Integrated Ferroelectrics, 63, 2004; pp. 27-33. |
C.J. Glassbrenner et al.; “Thermal Conductivity of Silicon and Germanium from 3K to the Melting Point;” Physical Review, vol. 134, No. 4A, May 18, 1964, pp. A1058-A1069. |
HC Materials, [online]; [retrieved on Mar. 14, 2013]; retrieved from the Internet http://www.hcmat.com/Pmn—Properties.html HCMat, H.C. Materials Corporation, “Properties of Piezoelectric PMN-PT Crystal,” 2004, pp. 1-4. |
A. Husmann et al.; “Dynamical Signature of the Mott-Hubbard Transition in Ni(S,Se)2;” Science, vol. 274; Dec. 13, 1996; pp. 1874-1876. |
A. Jayaraman et al.; “Continuous and Discontinuous Semiconductor-Metal Transition in Samarium Monochalcogenides Under Pressure;” Physical Review Letters, vol. 25, No. 20; Nov. 16, 1970; pp. 1430-1433. |
B.S. Kang et al.; “Pressure-induced changes in the conductivity of AlGaN/GaN high-electron mobility-transistor membranes;” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 14, Oct. 4, 2004; pp. 2962-2964. |
Young-Tae Kim et al.; “Study on Cell Characteristics of PRAM Using the Phase-Change Simulation;” IEEE, 2003, pp. 211-214. |
Ju. H. Krieger, “Acousto-Ferroelectric RAM-New Type of Nonvolatile Memory Device,” IEEE, pp. 53-55, 2007. |
G. Krill et al.; “Physical Properties of Compounds NiS2-xSex with Pyrite Structure: Metal-Non Metal Transition, Evidence of the Existence of an Antiferromaagnetic Metallic Phase;” Journal de Physique, vol. 10, No. 37; Oct. 1976; pp. C4-23-C427. |
Stefan Lai et al.; “OUM—A 180 nm Nonvolatile Memory Cell Element Technology for Stand Alone and Embedded Applications;” IEEE, IEDM Tech Digest, 2001, pp. 803-806. |
Maxim Lebedev et al.; “Effect of Thickness on the Piezoelectric Properties of Lead Zirconate Titanate Films Fabricated by Aerosol Deposition Method;” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 41, 2002, pp. 6669-6673. |
R. Lengsdorf et al.; “The observation of the insulator-metal transition in EuNio3 under high pressure;” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 16; 2004; pp. 3355-3360. |
J. Li, et al., “Ultrafast polarization switching in thin-film ferroelectrics,” Applied Physics Letters, 84, No. 7, 2004, p. 1174-1176. |
C. Liu et al.; “Pressure-induced insulator-conductor transition in a photoconducting organic liquid-crystal film;” Letter to Nature, vol. 418; Jul. 11, 2002; pp. 162-164. |
S.S. Lu et al.; “Piezoelectric field effect transistor (PEFET) using In0.2Ga0.8As/Al0.35/In0.2Ga0.8As/GaAS strained layer structure on (111)B GaAs substrate;” Electronic Letters May 12, 1994 vol. 30 No. 10; pp. 823-825. |
Jon Maimon et al.; “Chalcogenide-Based Non-Volatile Memory Technology;” IEEE Aerospace Conf. Proceedings, 2001, pp. 2289-2294. |
Morgan Advanced Materials, [online]; [retrieved on Oct. 23, 2013]; retrieved from the Internet http://www.morganelectroceramics.com/materials/piezoelectric/single-crystal-piezo/ Morgan Technical Ceramics Electroceramics, “Single Crystal Piezo,” Advanced Piezoelectric Materials, 2009, pp. 1-2. |
Y. Matsumuro, Y. Oishi, W.B. Wu, and M. Okuyama, “Preparation of PMN-PT Files by Laser Ablation Method,” Integrated Ferroelectrics, 20, 1998, pp. 95-105. |
A. Yukikuni et al.; “Pressure induced insulator-methal transition in hexagonal BaTi03;” Journal of Physical Society of Japan; 2004; Abstract Only, pp. 1-2. |
I. Mayergotz, et al. “Hysteresis in Piezoelectric and Ferroelectric Materials,” The Science of Hysteresis, vol. 3, Only Chapter 4, 2005, pp. 1-129. |
F. Nakamura, et al., “From Mott Insulator to Ferromagnetic Metal: A pressure Study of CA2RuO4,” Phys Rev B , vol. 65, No. 22, Article 220402, 2002, pp. 1-4. |
D. M. Newns et al., “High Response Piezoelectric and Piezoresistive Materials for Fast, Low Voltage Switching : Simulation and Theory of Novel Transduction Physics at the Nanoscale,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, 2012, pp. 3672-3677. |
D. M. Newns et al., “A Low-Voltage High-Speed Electronic Switch Based on Piezoelectric Transduction,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 111, No. 8, 2012, 084509, 18 pages. |
B. Elmegreen et al., “Piezoelectronic Memory,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/719,965, filed Dec. 19, 2012. |
R. Yu et al., “GaN Nanobelts Based Strain-Gated Piezotronic Logic Devices and Computation,” ACS Nano, Publication Date (Web): Jun. 18, 2013, pp. 1-7. |
Sharath Sriram et al.; ARNAM 2007 Annual Workshop, “Measurement of High Piezoelectric response of strontium-doped lead zirconate titanate thin films using a nano-indenter,” Abstract, 2007, pp. 1-1. |
S. Sriram et al.; “The effect of post-deposition cooling rate on the orientation of piezoelectric (Pb0.92Sr0.08) (Zr0.65Ti0.35)O3 thin films deposited by RF magnetron sputtering;” Semiconductor Science and Technology 21; 2006; pp. 1236-1243. |
S. Sriram et al.; “Measurement of high piezoelectric response of stronium-doped lead zirconate titanate thin films using a nanoindenter;” Journal of Applied Physics 101, 104910 (2007), pp. 101-105. |
Hidekuni Takao et al., “Stress-Sensitive Differential Amplifiers Using Piezoresistive Effects of MOSFETs and Their Application to Three-Axial Accelerometers,” Elsevier, Sensors and Actuators—A Physical; 65; pp. 61-68; 1998. |
T. Theis and P. Solomon, “In quest of the •Next Switch: Prospects for greatly reduced power dissipation in a successor to the silicon field-effect transistor,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 98, No. 12, pp. 2005-2014, Dec. 2010. |
S. Tomic et al.; “Pressure-Induced Metal-to-Insulator Phase Transitions in the Organic Conductor (2,5 DM-DCNQI) 2Cu;” Europhysics Letters, 5 (6); Mar. 15, 1988; pp. 553-558. |
Scott Tyson et al.; “Nonvolatile, High Density, High Performance Phase Change Memory;” IEEE Aerospace Conf. Proceedings, 2001, pp. 385-390. |
Arturas Ulcinas et al.; “Investigation of microstructure and piezoelectric properties of Zr- and Sm-doped PbTiO3 nanostructured thin films derived by sol-gel technology;” Sensors and Actuators B 109, 2005, pp. 97-101. |
X. Wang et al.; “Piezoelectric Field Effect Transistor and Nanoforce Sensor Based on a Single ZnO Nanowire;” Nano Letters 2006 vol. 6, No. 12; pp. 2768-2772. |
F. Xu et al.; “Longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient measurement for bulk ceramics and thin films using pneumatic pressure rig;” Journal of Applied Physics vol. 86, No. 1, Jul. 1, 1999; pp. 588-594. |
Y. Yamashita et al.; “Can relaxor piezoelectric materials outperform PZT?(Review);” IEEE; 1996; 71-78. |
Bruce G. Elmegreen, et al., “Piezoelectronic Devices with Novel Force Amplification” U.S. Appl. No. 61/950,343, filed Mar. 10, 2014. |
A. Jayaraman, “Pressure-volume relationship and pressure-induced electronic and structural transformations in Eu and Yb monochalcogenides,” Physical Review B, vol. 9, No. 6, Mar. 15, 1974, pp. 2513-2520. |
A. Jayaraman, et al., “Study of the Valence Transition in Eu-, Yb-, and Ca-substituted SmS under High Pressure and some Comments on other Substitutions,” Physical Review B, vol. 19, No. 8, Apr. 15, 1979, pp. 1-8. |
Xu et al., “Dielectric hysteresis from transverse electric fields in lead zirconate titanate thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 74, No. 23, Jun. 7, 1999, pp. 3549-3551. |
Brian A. Bryce, et al., “Integrating a Piezoresistive Element in a Piezoelectronic Transistor” U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,886, filed Oct. 31, 2014. |
Brian A. Bryce, et al., “Passivation and Alignment of Piezoelectronic Transistor Piezoresistor” U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,929, filed Oct. 31, 2014. |
Brian A. Bryce, et al., “Piezoelectronic Transistor With Co-Planar Common and Gate Electrodes” U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,834, filed Oct. 31, 2014. |
Bruce G. Elmegreen, et al. “Piezoelectronic Device With Novel Force Amplification” U.S. Appl. No. 14/577,279, filed Dec. 19, 2014. |
Bruce G. Elmegreen, et al., “Low Voltage Transistor and Logic Devices With Multiple, Stacked Piezoelectronic Layers” U.S. Appl. No. 14/468,822, filed Aug. 26, 2014. |
Samal et al., “Low-temperature (=200° C.) plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition of dense titanium nitride thin films”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, vol. 31, No. 1, 2013, pp. 1-8. |
D. Xue, et al., “Elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric properties of Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3-50(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 Pb-free ceramic at the morphotropic phase boundary,” Journal of Applied Physics, 109, 054110, 2011, pp. 1-7. |
D.C. Gupta, et al., “Pressure induced magnetic, electronic and mechanical properties of SmX (X=Se, Te),” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 21, 2009, 436011, pp. 1-11. |
S.J. Gross, “Micromachined Switches and Cantilever Actuators Based on Piezoelectric Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT),” A Thesis in Electrical Engineering, PhD Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, Aug. 2004, pp. 1-156. |
R. Polcawich, et al., “Surface Micromachined Microelectromechanical Ohmic Series Switch Using Thin-Film Piezoelectric Actuators,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 55, No. 12, Dec. 2007, pp. 2642-2654. |
G. M. Rebeiz, “RF Mems Switches: Status of the Technology,” Transducers, The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystes, Jun. 8-12, 2003, pp. 1726-1729. |
Hu Cao, et al., “Elastic, Piezoelectric, and Dielectric Properties of 0.58Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3) O3-0.42PbTiO3 Singel Crystal,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 96, No. 1, Jul. 1, 2004, pp. 1-6. |
Hu et al., “Converse Piezoelectric Effect Induced Transverse Deflection of a Free-Standing ZnO Microbelt”, Nano Letters, vol. 9, No. 7, 2009, pp. 2661-2665. |
J. Park, et al., “Direct Observation of Nanoparticle Superlattice Formation by Using Liquid Cell Transmission Electron Microscopy,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, No. 3, Feb. 2012, pp. 2078-2085. |
Matthew W. Copel, et al., “Piezoelectronic Switch Device for RF Applications” U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,380, filed Oct. 31, 2014. |
P.M. Solomon, et al., “The PiezoElectronic Switch: a Path to Low Energy Electronics,” IEEE, 2013, pp. 1-2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150269984 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |