The present invention relates to charge-trapping memories.
The state of a charge-trapping memory cell is defined by the electric charge stored in the cell's charge-trapping dielectric (e.g. silicon nitride). The charge-trapping dielectric is positioned between the cell's active area (a semiconductor area including the cell's channel and source/drain regions) and the control gate. The charge-trapping dielectric is insulated from the active area by tunnel dielectric (e.g. silicon dioxide). The memory state can be changed by electron transfer between the charge-trapping dielectric and the active area through the tunnel dielectric. For example, to program the memory cell, a positive voltage is applied to the control gate relative to the channel region to transfer electrons from the active area to the charge-trapping dielectric. To erase the memory cell, a negative voltage is applied to transfer electrons back to the active area.
When electrons are being transferred from the active area to the charge-trapping dielectric, electrons should be prevented from moving from the charge-trapping dielectric to the control gate. Likewise, when the memory is being erased, electrons should be blocked from moving from the control gate to the charge-trapping dielectric. For this purpose, blocking dielectric (e.g. silicon dioxide or aluminum oxide) is provided between the charge-trapping dielectric and the control gate.
The insulating property of the blocking dielectric can be weakened at the edges by defects created when the blocking dielectric is patterned. The resulting current leakage at the edges of the blocking dielectric makes it more difficult to control the state of the cell by the program and erase processes described above, and the charge leakage reduces the data retention time. The leakage can be reduced by increasing the distance between the control gate and the edges of the blocking dielectric. More particularly, the following manufacturing process has been proposed. First, layers are formed that will provide the tunnel dielectric, the charge-trapping dielectric, the blocking dielectric, and the control gate. Then the control gate is patterned. Then dielectric spacers are formed on the control gate's sidewalls. The control gate and the spacers are used to pattern the blocking dielectric. The spacers cause the blocking dielectric edges to protrude farther outward relative to the control gate edges, thus increasing the resistance of the current path between the blocking dielectric's edges and the control gate.
This section summarizes some features of the invention. Other features may be described in the subsequent sections. The invention is defined by the appended claims, which are incorporated into this section by reference.
The inventors have discovered, and experimentally confirmed, that the current leakage through the blocking dielectric edges can be reduced by modifying the composition of the charge-trapping dielectric at the edges adjacent to the edges of the blocking dielectric. For example, in some embodiments, the charge-trapping dielectric is formed of silicon-rich silicon nitride (“SiRN” hereinbelow). After the charge-trapping dielectric and the blocking dielectric have been patterned, the wafer is oxidized. Therefore, the edge portions of the charge-trapping dielectric are converted to silicon oxide and/or silicon oxynitride (SION). The oxidation reduces the density of the charge trapping sites at the edges of the charge trapping dielectric and hence reduces the conductivity of charges at the edges, thus reducing the charge and current leakage through the blocking dielectric edges (and through the tunnel dielectric edges).
Silicon-rich silicon nitride advantageously provides a higher density of charge-trapping sites than stoichiometric silicon nitride (Si3N4). The high density of trapping sites allows one to reduce the programming and erase times and/or the programming and erase voltages and to facilitate differentiation between memory states in the reading operation. However, the high density of trapping sites may increase the leakage current, making it particularly important that the leakage current be reduced. Further, in some dielectrics including aluminum oxide, the etch damage cannot be effectively annealed by heating, so reducing the edge leakage via modifying the charge-trapping dielectric is particularly appropriate.
Some embodiments include spacers over the control gate's edges over the blocking dielectric.
The invention is not limited to such spacers, to the silicon rich silicon nitride, or other features or advantages described above except as defined by the appended claims.
The embodiments described in this section illustrate but do not limit the invention except as defined by the appended claims. In particular, the materials and dimensions given in this section are for illustration purposes only except as defined by the appended claims.
Charge trapping dielectric 160 is deposited on tunnel dielectric 150. In some embodiments, charge trapping dielectric 160 is silicon-rich silicon nitride (“SiRN”, SiXNy, x:y>3:4) formed by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) to a thickness of 8 nm. The atomic ratio x:y of silicon to nitrogen can be controlled by controlling the ratio of the flow rates of the gaseous species which provide the silicon and nitrogen atoms for the CVD reaction. In some embodiments, the x:y ratio is approximately 1:1.
Blocking dielectric 180 is deposited on the wafer. In some embodiments, blocking dielectric 180 is aluminum oxide deposited to 15 nm thickness by atomic layer deposition.
If desired, the structure can be patterned at this stage to form shallow trench isolation regions (STI regions) 184 to isolate the active areas 114 of adjacent memory cells from each other. For example, a hard mask (not shown) can be formed, and the layers 180, 160, 150 and substrate 110 can be etched to form the STI trenches in the substrate. The trenches can be filled with dielectric 184, e.g. silicon dioxide, which initially covers the structure but then is planarized (e.g. by an etch and/or chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP)) to provide a top surface coplanar with the planar top surface of blocking dielectric 180. See e.g. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/113,509 filed on Apr. 25, 2005 by Shiraiwa et al. and published as no. 2006/0240635 A1 on Oct. 26, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. If desired, trench dielectric 184 can be etched down below the top surface of blocking dielectric 180.
Alternatively, the STI isolation can be formed before deposition of tunnel dielectric 150. The STI dielectric 184 can protrude above the substrate 110. Then tunnel dielectric 150 can be formed (by thermal oxidation for example). Then charge trapping dielectric 160 can be deposited to fill the spaces between STI regions 184 and etched down to have a top surface below the top surface of the STI dielectric 184. Blocking dielectric 180 can be deposited to fill the spaces between STI regions 184 and can be etched down or polished so that its top surface is level with the top surface of the STI dielectric 184. These details are not limiting. The invention is not limited to a particular type or geometry of substrate isolation. For example, the isolation can be formed by LOCOS, pn junctions, and/or possibly other techniques, or substrate isolation can be omitted depending on a particular application.
Spacers 210 are formed on these stacks' sidewalls. In some embodiments, the spacers are formed of silicon nitride and are 10 nm wide at the bottom. The spacers can be formed without a photolithography by a conformal deposition and anisotropic etch of a silicon nitride layer. The etch can be selective to blocking dielectric 180 and STI dielectric 184. The spacers are not formed elsewhere in the memory array if the top surface of STI regions 184 is coplanar with the top surface of blocking dielectric 180 or if the difference in height between the adjacent top surfaces is small. The invention is not limited to such embodiments however.
In some embodiments, the outer boundary of edge regions 160E is entirely or almost entirely converted to silicon oxide. Thus, the atomic ratio O:N of oxygen to nitrogen is infinite or almost infinite at the outer boundary of edge regions 160E. The O:N ratio gradually decreases towards the inner boundary of regions 160E.
In some embodiments, the oxidation process is wet oxidation to provide a sharp drop of oxygen concentration at the inner boundary of edge regions 160E. The temperature and other parameters may vary depending on the materials for conductive layers 190, 192 to avoid damage (e.g. peel-off) to this layers. Note for example that an excessive temperature may cause tungsten to peel off. Some embodiments use ISSG (in-situ steam generation) at the temperature of 850° C. for one minute. Another suitable process is RTO (rapid thermal oxidation) performed at 900° C. for five minutes at atmospheric pressure in oxygen ambient. Still another suitable process is SELOX described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,078,313 B2 issued Jul. 18, 2006 to Kirchhoff and incorporated herein by reference. See also M. Ripley et al., “Selective Rapid Thermal Oxidation of Silicon vs. Tungsten using Oxygen in Hydrogen”, Advanced Thermal Processing of Semiconductors, 2007 (RTP 2007; 15th International Conference, pages 215-221), incorporated herein by reference. The SELOX process time may be 120 minutes. This process involves low temperature oxidation of silicon in the presence of hydrogen. Hydrogen is used to avoid tungsten oxidation if tungsten is present and exposed. An exemplary temperature range is 400-950° C.
In these embodiments, the oxidation process does not oxidize the edges of charge-trapping dielectric 160 adjacent to STI regions 184 (except at the corners of these edges). Of note, if blocking dielectric 180 was deposited after the STI formation as described above, then the edges of blocking dielectric 180 adjacent to the STI regions were not etched when the blocking dielectric was patterned. Therefore, these edges are not subjected to the etching damage and are not as leaky as the edges adjacent to the edge regions 160E. In some embodiments however the charge trapping dielectric 160 is oxidized on all sides, including at the edges adjacent to STI regions 184. This can be done, for example, if the charge trapping dielectric 160 and the blocking dielectric 180 are patterned and subjected to oxidation before deposition of control gate layers 190, 192.
The remaining fabrication steps can be conventional. For example, a silicon nitride liner (not shown) can be deposited over the structure, and then an N+ implant can be conducted to form N+ doped source/drain regions 410 (
Oxidation of the charge trapping dielectric's edge regions 160E also increases the breakdown voltage of the cell.
The data points VBD_TANOS were obtained for the capacitors rectangular in top view, having the lateral dimensions of 100×80 μm. The data points VBD_TANOSGE were obtained for the capacitors with tantalum nitride 190 and aluminum oxide 180 patterned as a multi-finger structure shown in top view in
The data points VBD_TANOSFE were obtained with the bottom polysilicon layer being patterned as 1000-finger structure as in
The data points shown as “No Ox” in
Clearly, the rectangular capacitor (VBD_TANOS) has the largest area but the shortest peripheral boundary. This capacitor also has a large breakdown voltage (above 22V for most data points, and above 20V for all the data points with oxidized edges of SiRN 160).
Table 1 below illustrates possible improvements in data retention. Table 1 shows test results performed on two wafers WF1, WF2 with test structures like those described above in connection with
After the test structures were fabricated, the wafers were baked, and the data retention was measured as a threshold voltage shift (Vt shift) after baking. Initially (before the baking) the test structures were programmed to Vt=3V. Then each wafer was baked in nitrogen ambient for one hour at 200° C., and Vt was measured. The results are shown in the line “1 hour, 200° C.”. Then the wafers were baked for two more hours (for the total of three hours) in nitrogen ambient at 200° C. and Vt was measured again. The results are shown in the line “3 hours, 200° C.”. Clearly, the wafer WF1 (with the oxidized silicon nitride 160) had a smaller Vt shift and hence better retention.
Some embodiments of the present invention provide a method for manufacturing an integrated circuit comprising a nonvolatile memory cell, the memory cell comprising: a charge trapping region which is a dielectric region; and a conductive gate insulated from the charge trapping region by a first dielectric (e.g. by 180); the method comprising: (a) forming (i) charge trapping dielectric for the charge trapping region, (ii) the first dielectric, and (iii) a conductor for the conductive gate, wherein the charge trapping dielectric has an edge adjacent to an edge of the first dielectric; and then (b) oxidizing the charge trapping dielectric at said edge of the charge trapping dielectric to form an oxidized region (e.g. 160E) in the charge trapping dielectric, the oxidized region extending from said edge of the charge trapping dielectric by at least 4 nm.
In some embodiments, the charge trapping dielectric comprises silicon rich silicon nitride. Further, at least one of (i), (ii), (iii) is true, wherein: (i) throughout the oxidized region of the charge trapping dielectric, an atomic oxygen concentration is more than 30%; (ii) throughout the oxidized region of the charge trapping dielectric, the atomic nitrogen concentration is less than 30%; (iii) operation (b) increases an effective oxide thickness of the charge trapping dielectric by 3 nm.
In some embodiments, operation (a) comprises patterning the first dielectric by an etch which etches the first dielectric to form said edge of the first dielectric. Note for example the etch of aluminum oxide 180 described above in connection with FIG. 3A. The etch may reduce the resistivity of the first dielectric at the edge of the first dielectric to make the first dielectric leakier at the edge.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises, before operation (a), forming a second dielectric (e.g. tunnel dielectric 150) to insulate the charge-trapping dielectric from the memory cell's active area located in a semiconductor region.
In some embodiments, the oxidized region has a lower density of charge trapping sites than another region of the charge trapping dielectric farther away from said edge of the charge trapping dielectric. For example, edge regions 160E may have a lower density of charge trapping sites than the charge trapping dielectric 160 between the regions 160E.
In some embodiments, the oxidized region has a higher density of charge trapping sites than the second dielectric. For example, edge regions 160E may have a higher density of charge trapping sites than tunnel dielectric 150.
The invention is not limited to the embodiments described above. Other embodiments and variations are within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.