Patent Grant
11737766
Robotic-assisted surgical systems have been developed to improve surgical precision and enable the implementation of new surgical procedures. For example, robotic systems have been developed to sense a surgeon's hand movements and translate them to scaled-down micro-movements and filter out unintentional tremors for precise microsurgical techniques in organ transplants, reconstructions, and minimally invasive surgeries. Other robotic systems are directed to telemanipulation of surgical tools such that the surgeon does not have to be present in the operating room, thereby facilitating remote surgery. Feedback-controlled robotic systems have also been developed to provide smoother manipulation of a surgical tool during a procedure than could be achieved by an unaided surgeon.
However, widespread acceptance of robotic systems by surgeons and hospitals is limited for a variety of reasons. Current systems are expensive to own and maintain. They often require extensive preoperative surgical planning prior to use, and they extend the required preparation time in the operating room. They are physically intrusive, possibly obscuring portions of a surgeons field of view and blocking certain areas around the operating table, such that a surgeon and/or surgical assistants are relegated to one side of the operating table. Current systems may also be non-intuitive or otherwise cumbersome to use, particularly for surgeons who have developed a special skill or “feel” for performing certain maneuvers during surgery and who find that such skill cannot be implemented using the robotic system. Finally, robotic surgical systems may be vulnerable to malfunction or operator error, despite safety interlocks and power backups.
Spinal surgeries often require precision drilling and placement of screws or other implements in relation to the spine, and there may be constrained access to the vertebrae during surgery that makes such maneuvers difficult. Catastrophic damage or death may result from improper drilling or maneuvering of the body during spinal surgery, due to the proximity of the spinal cord and arteries. Common spinal surgical procedures include a discectomy for removal of all or part of a disk, a foraminotomy for widening of the opening where nerve roots leave the spinal column, a laminectomy for removal of the lamina or bone spurs in the back, and spinal fusion for fusing of two vertebrae or vertebral segments together to eliminate pain caused by movement of the vertebrae.
Spinal surgeries that involve screw placement require preparation of holes in bone (e.g., vertebral segments) prior to placement of the screws. Where such procedures are performed manually, in some implementations, a surgeon judges a drill trajectory for subsequent screw placement on the basis of pre-operative CT scans. Other manual methods which do not involve usage of the pre-operative CT scans, such as fluoroscopy, 3D fluoroscopy or natural landmark-based, may be used to determine the trajectory for preparing holes in bone prior to placement of the screws. In some implementations, the surgeon holds the drill in his hand while drilling, and fluoroscopic images are obtained to verify if the trajectory is correct. Some surgical techniques involve usage of different tools, such as a pedicle finder or K-wires. Such procedures rely strongly on the expertise of the surgeon, and there is significant variation in success rate among different surgeons. Screw misplacement is a common problem in such surgical procedures.
Image-guided spinal surgeries involve optical tracking to aid in screw placement. However, such procedures are currently performed manually, and surgical tools can be inaccurately positioned despite virtual tracking. A surgeon is required to coordinate his real-world, manual manipulation of surgical tools using images displayed on a two dimensional screen. Such procedures can be non-intuitive and require training, since the surgeon's eye must constantly scan both the surgical site and the screen to confirm alignment. Furthermore, procedural error can result in registration inaccuracy of the image-guiding system, rendering it useless, or even misleading.
Certain force feedback systems are used by surgeons in certain procedures; however such systems have a large footprint and take up valuable, limited space in the operating room. These systems also require the use of surgical tools that are specially adapted for use with the force feedback system, and the training required by surgeons to operate such systems can be significant. Moreover, surgeons may not be able to use expertise they have developed in performing spinal surgeries when adapting to use of the current force feedback systems. Such systems, while precise, may require more surgical time and more operating room preparation time to ready placement of the equipment for surgery. Thus, there is a need for systems, apparatus, and methods that provide enhanced precision in performing surgeries such as spinal surgeries.
Described herein is a surgical instrument guide for use with a robotic surgical system, for example, during spinal surgery. In certain embodiments, the guide is attached to or is part of an end effector of a robotic arm, and provides a rigid structure that allows for precise preparation of patient tissue (e.g., preparation of a pedicle) by drilling, tapping, or other manipulation, as well as precise placement of a screw in a drilled hole or affixation of a prosthetic or implant in a prepared patient situation.
In certain embodiments, the guide has a tubular shape with a longitudinal notch along a portion of its length. The notch is sized to allow a surgical instrument to slide through the guide in a fixed orientation while the guide is held by the robotic arm at a desired, fixed trajectory in relation to the patient. In some implementations, the guide has more than one notch (e.g., two notches). Among other things, incorporation of two or more notches permits ambidextrous manipulation of the end effector and/or tool.
The surgical instrument, in some implementations, is fitted with a tool support having a navigational marker (e.g., a multipoint, planar marker) attached thereto via a peg sized to fit in the notch. In some implementations, the peg is utilized without the navigation marker to maintain the orientation of the surgical instrument. The tool support constrainably slides along at least a portion of the guide interior. The guide restricts the movement of the tool support (and hence the surgical instrument) as the surgical instrument slides along the interior of the guide. Thus, because of the notch, movement of the marker is constrained in a fixed orientation as it slides along the axis defined by the guide, e.g., the marker cannot rotate about the axis along which movement of the surgical tool is constrained. This facilitates and simplifies tracking of the marker, e.g., via a remote tracking system that displays real-time tracking of the surgical instrument during the surgical procedure.
The guide, in some implementations, also allows better control and maneuverability of the surgical tool, since rotation of the tool is disallowed (e.g., by the notch in the guide and the peg on the tool support) as the surgeon slides it through the guide along the fixed trajectory. Furthermore, the guide still allows the robotic arm to compensate for a force or torque applied by the surgeon, maintaining the fixed trajectory in relation to the patient despite the applied force or torque.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a surgical instrument guide for use with a robotic surgical system. The surgical instrument guide may include a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end that define an axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted. The tubular structure (e.g., a cylindrical structure) may have an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide. The tubular structure may have an exterior surface comprising at least one flange that is configured for secure coupling of the guide to an end effector of the robotic surgical system. In certain embodiments, the tubular structure includes a longitudinal notch (e.g., a slot) along its length that is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a navigation marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system. The navigation marker may be used by navigation camera to track the surgical instrument. The navigation marker may be, for example, navigation tracker such as the Dedicated NavLock™ tracker from Medtronic, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minn.
The longitudinal notch may be sized in relation to a peg to permit the surgical instrument to slide along the axis of insertion in reference to the tool support. In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument is a drill bit, tap, screw driver, or an awl. For example, the surgical instrument may be a drill bit and the surgical instrument guide may be a drill guide. In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument guide is configured to be used to guide a screw implant and a tissue protector.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a robotic arm with an end effector comprising a surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough. The system may include a manipulator configured to allow robotically-assisted or unassisted positioning and/or movement of the surgical instrument guide by a user with at least four degrees of freedom to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory (e.g., a desired path of the surgical tool) in relation to a patient situation. The surgical instrument guide may include a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end and the structure may define the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a method of performing surgery with a robotic surgical system. The method may include moving a mobile cart transporting a robotic surgical system comprising a robotic arm in proximity to an operating table, wherein the robotic arm has an end effector comprising a surgical instrument guide attached thereto, the surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough. The method may include stabilizing the mobile cart and maneuvering the robotic arm to a desired position to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation. The surgical instrument guide may include a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted.
Stabilizing the mobile cart may include extracting one or more rigid legs on the mobile cart such that the mobile cart rests on the one or more rigid legs of the mobile cart. In certain embodiments, stabilizing the mobile cart includes retracting one or more wheels on the mobile cart such that the mobile cart rests on one or more rigid legs of the mobile cart.
In certain embodiments, the method includes fixing the position of the robotic arm (and, therefore, the position of the surgical instrument guide) and maneuvering the surgical instrument in a manner that is constrained by the surgical instrument guide. In certain embodiments, prior to maneuvering the robotic arm to a desired position, obtaining or accessing a CT scan, 3D CT scan, fluoroscopy, 3D fluoroscopy, or natural landmark-based image of the patient situation. The method may include maneuvering the surgical instrument through the surgical instrument guide and maneuvering the drill bit through the drill bit guide.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a surgical instrument guide for use with a robotic surgical system. The surgical instrument guide may include a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining an axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted. The tubular structure may have an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide. The tubular structure may have an exterior surface comprising at least one flange that is configured for secure coupling of the guide to an end effector of the robotic surgical system. The tubular structure, in some implementations, includes a longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a navigation marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system.
In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument guide includes a lock that, when engaged, restricts (e.g., prevents) movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure. The lock, in some implementations, when engaged, prevents movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure beyond a preset position along the axis defined by the guide. The lock, when engaged, may prevent removal of the surgical instrument from the surgical instrument guide. The lock may be an end lock that, when engaged, prevents removal of the surgical instrument from the surgical instrument guide. The lock may be an intermediate lock that, when engaged, prevents movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure beyond a preset position along the axis defined by the guide.
In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument guide includes an instrument position sensor (e.g., inductive sensor, capacitive sensor, resistive sensor, mechanical end switches, optical measuring device, force sensing device, or other similar position sensor) configured to detect the position of the surgical instrument in the rigid hollow tubular structure.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a robotic surgical system for performing surgery. The system may include a robotic arm with an end effector comprising a surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough, and a manipulator configured to allow robotically-assisted or unassisted positioning and/or movement of the surgical instrument guide by a user with at least four degrees of freedom to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation. The surgical instrument guide may include a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted. The tubular structure has an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide. The tubular structure may have an exterior surface comprising at least one flange that is configured for secure coupling of the guide to the end-effector of the robotic surgical system. The tubular structure may include a longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a navigation marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system. The surgical instrument guide may include a lock that, when engaged, restricts (e.g., prevents) movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a method of performing surgery with a robotic surgical system. The method may include obtaining access to one or more vertebrae of a patient; attaching a patient navigation marker to the patient; registering the patient (e.g., using intra-operative images of the patient situation; e.g., 3D fluoroscopy images); moving a mobile cart transporting a robotic surgical system that includes a robotic arm in proximity to an operating table, wherein the robotic arm has an end effector that includes a surgical instrument guide attached thereto, the surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough; stabilizing the mobile cart; inserting a first surgical instrument into the surgical instrument guide until an intermediate lock of the surgical instrument guide is engaged; maneuvering the robotic arm to a desired position to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation, wherein the surgical instrument guide includes a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted; fixing the position of the robotic arm (and, therefore, the position of the surgical instrument guide); maneuvering the surgical instrument along the desired trajectory, wherein the robotic surgical system assists in said maneuvering; releasing, the intermediate lock and placing the robotic arm in a hold position mode; manually preparing a hole for a screw using the first surgical instrument; removing the first surgical instrument from the surgical instrument guide; and inserting an implant through the guiding tube and fixing the implant to one of the one or more vertebrae.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a method of performing surgery with a robotic surgical system. The method may include attaching a patient navigation marker to the patient; registering the patient (e.g., using intra-operative images of the patient situation. e.g., 3D fluoroscopy images); moving a mobile cart transporting a robotic surgical system that includes a robotic arm in proximity to an operating table, wherein the robotic arm has an end effector that includes a surgical instrument guide attached thereto, the surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough; stabilizing the mobile cart; inserting a first surgical instrument into the surgical instrument guide until an intermediate lock of the surgical instrument guide is engaged; maneuvering the robotic arm to a desired position to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation, wherein the surgical instrument guide includes a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted, wherein the desired trajectory is stored in a memory device of the robotic surgical system; maneuvering the robotic arm such that a surgeon may manually access one or more vertebrae; obtaining access to one or more vertebrae of a patient; maneuvering the robotic arm such to the desired position to align the axis defined by the instrument guide at the desired trajectory, wherein the robotic surgical system assists in said maneuvering; maneuvering the surgical instrument along the desired trajectory, wherein the robotic surgical system assists in said maneuvering; releasing, the intermediate lock and placing the robotic arm in a hold position mode; manually preparing a hole for a screw using the first surgical instrument; removing the first surgical instrument from the surgical instrument guide; and inserting an implant through the guiding tube and fixing the implant to one of the one or more vertebrae.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, A surgical instrument guide for use with a robotic surgical system, the surgical instrument guide comprising a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining an axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted, wherein the tubular structure has an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide, wherein the tubular structure has an exterior surface comprising at least one flange that is configured for secure coupling of the guide to an end effector of the robotic surgical system, and wherein the tubular structure comprises a longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a navigation marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a robotic surgical system for performing surgery. In some implementations, the system includes: a robotic arm with an end effector comprising a surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough; and a manipulator configured to allow robotically-assisted or unassisted positioning and/or movement of the surgical instrument guide by a user with at least four degrees of freedom to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation, wherein the surgical instrument guide comprises a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted, wherein the tubular structure has an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide, wherein the tubular structure has an exterior surface comprising at least one flange that is configured for secure coupling of the guide to the end-effector of the robotic surgical system, and wherein the tubular structure comprises a longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a navigation marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system.
In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument is a drill bit, tap, screw driver, or awl. In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument is a drill bit and the surgical instrument guide is a drill guide. In certain embodiments, the robotic surgical system is for use in spinal surgery.
In certain embodiments, the rigid hollow tubular structure is a cylindrical structure. In certain embodiments, the longitudinal notch is a slot. In certain embodiments, the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to permit the surgical instrument to slide along the axis of insertion in reference to the tool support. In certain embodiments, the navigation marker is used by navigation camera to track the surgical instrument. In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument guide is configured to be used to guide a screw implant and a tissue protector.
In certain embodiments, the manipulator is attached to the robotic arm. In certain embodiments, the manipulator is molded into the robotic arm. In certain embodiments, the axis can be aligned with the desired trajectory in relation to the patient situation via the manipulator.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a method of performing surgery with a robotic surgical system. In certain embodiments, the method includes: moving a mobile cart transporting a robotic surgical system comprising a robotic arm in proximity to an operating table, wherein the robotic arm has an end effector comprising a surgical instrument guide attached thereto, the surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough; stabilizing the mobile cart; maneuvering the robotic arm to a desired position to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation, wherein the surgical instrument guide comprises a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted; fixing the position of the robotic arm (and, therefore, the position of the surgical instrument guide); and maneuvering the surgical instrument in a manner that is constrained by the surgical instrument guide, wherein: the surgical instrument is fitted with a tool support shaped and sized to slide through the surgical instrument guide along the axis defined by the guide, the tubular structure of the surgical instrument guide has an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide, and the tubular structure comprises a longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the navigation marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system.
In certain embodiments, stabilizing the mobile cart includes extracting one or more rigid legs on the mobile cart such that the mobile cart rests on the one or more rigid legs of the mobile cart. In certain embodiments, stabilizing the mobile cart includes retracting one or more wheels on the mobile cart such that the mobile cart rests on one or more rigid legs of the mobile cart.
In certain embodiments, prior to maneuvering the robotic arm to a desired position, the method includes obtaining or accessing a CT scan, 3D CT scan, fluoroscopy, 3D fluoroscopy, or natural landmark-based image of the patient situation. In certain embodiments, the method includes maneuvering the surgical instrument through the surgical instrument guide. In certain embodiments, the method includes maneuvering the drill bit through the drill bit guide.
In certain embodiments, the desired trajectory is a desired path of the surgical tool. In certain embodiments, the tubular structure includes a second longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the second longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a navigation marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a surgical instrument guide for use with a robotic surgical system. In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument guide includes a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining an axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted, wherein the tubular structure has an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide, wherein the tubular structure has an exterior surface comprising at least one flange that is configured for secure coupling of the guide to an end effector of the robotic surgical system, and wherein the tubular structure comprises a longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a navigation marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system; and a lock that, when engaged, restricts (e.g., prevents) movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure.
In certain embodiments, the lock, when engaged, prevents movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure beyond a preset position along the axis defined by the guide. In certain embodiments, the lock, when engaged, prevents removal of the surgical instrument from the surgical instrument guide. In certain embodiments, the lock is an end lock that, when engaged, prevents removal of the surgical instrument from the surgical instrument guide. In certain embodiments, the lock is an intermediate lock that, when engaged, prevents movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure beyond a preset position along the axis defined by the guide.
In certain embodiments, the disclosed technology includes an instrument position sensor (e.g., inductive sensor, capacitive sensor, resistive sensor, mechanical end switches, optical measuring device, force sensing device, or other similar position sensor) configured to detect the position of the surgical instrument in the rigid hollow tubular structure.
In certain embodiments, the robotic surgical system includes: a robotic arm with an end effector comprising a surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough; and a manipulator configured to allow robotically-assisted or unassisted positioning and/or movement of the surgical instrument guide by a user with at least four degrees of freedom to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation, wherein the surgical instrument guide comprises a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted, wherein the tubular structure has an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide, wherein the tubular structure has an exterior surface comprising at least one flange that is configured for secure coupling of the guide to the end-effector of the robotic surgical system, wherein the tubular structure comprises a longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a navigation marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system, and wherein the surgical instrument guide comprises a lock that, when engaged, restricts (e.g., prevents) movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a method of performing surgery with a robotic surgical system, the method including: obtaining access to one or more vertebrae of a patient; attaching a patient navigation marker to the patient; registering the patient (e.g., using intra-operative images of the patient situation; e.g., 3D fluoroscopy images); moving a mobile cart transporting a robotic surgical system comprising a robotic arm in proximity to an operating table, wherein the robotic arm has an end effector comprising a surgical instrument guide attached thereto, the surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough; stabilizing the mobile cart; inserting a first surgical instrument into the surgical instrument guide until an intermediate lock of the surgical instrument guide is engaged; maneuvering the robotic arm to a desired position to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation, wherein the surgical instrument guide comprises a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted; fixing the position of the robotic arm (and, therefore, the position of the surgical instrument guide); maneuvering the surgical instrument along the desired trajectory, wherein the robotic surgical system assists in said maneuvering; releasing, the intermediate lock and placing the robotic arm in a hold position mode; manually preparing a hole for a screw using the first surgical instrument; removing the first surgical instrument from the surgical instrument guide; and inserting an implant through the guiding tube and fixing the implant to one of the one or more vertebrae.
The disclosed technology, in certain embodiments, includes a method of performing surgery with a robotic surgical system, the method includes: attaching a patient navigation marker to the patient; registering the patient (e.g., using intra-operative images of the patient situation. e.g., 3D fluoroscopy images); moving a mobile cart transporting a robotic surgical system comprising a robotic arm in proximity to an operating table, wherein the robotic arm has an end effector comprising a surgical instrument guide attached thereto, the surgical instrument guide configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument therethrough; stabilizing the mobile cart; inserting a first surgical instrument into the surgical instrument guide until an intermediate lock of the surgical instrument guide is engaged; maneuvering the robotic arm to a desired position to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation, wherein the surgical instrument guide comprises a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end, said structure defining the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted, wherein the desired trajectory is stored in a memory device of the robotic surgical system; maneuvering the robotic arm such that a surgeon may manually access one or more vertebrae; obtaining access to one or more vertebrae of a patient; maneuvering the robotic arm such to the desired position to align the axis defined by the instrument guide at the desired trajectory, wherein the robotic surgical system assists in said maneuvering; maneuvering the surgical instrument along the desired trajectory, wherein the robotic surgical system assists in said maneuvering; releasing, the intermediate lock and placing the robotic arm in a hold position mode; manually preparing a hole for a screw using the first surgical instrument; removing the first surgical instrument from the surgical instrument guide; and inserting an implant through the guiding tube and fixing the implant to one of the one or more vertebrae.
In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument is fitted with a tool support shaped and sized to slide through the surgical instrument guide along the axis defined by the guide, the tubular structure of the surgical instrument guide has an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide, and the tubular structure comprises a longitudinal notch along its length, wherein the longitudinal notch is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the navigation marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system.
In certain embodiments, the system includes an instrument position sensor configured to detect the position of the surgical instrument in the rigid hollow tubular structure.
In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument guide includes a lock that, when engaged, restricts (e.g., prevents) movement of the surgical instrument within the rigid hollow tubular structure. In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument guide includes one or more input devices (e.g., one or more electro-mechanical buttons; e.g., two input devices). In certain embodiments, the surgical instrument guide includes an activation switch (e.g., sized and shaped to detect the presence of a surgeon's hand on the surgical instrument guide).
The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent and better understood by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The features and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which like reference characters identify corresponding elements throughout. In the drawings, like reference numbers generally indicate identical, functionally similar, and/or structurally similar elements.
In some embodiments, the operation may be spinal surgery, such as a discectomy, a foraminotomy, a laminectomy, or a spinal fusion. In some implementations, the surgical robotic system includes a surgical robot 102 on a mobile cart 114. The surgical robot 102 in the example shown in
The mobile cart 114 may permit a user (operator) 106a, such as a technician, nurse, surgeon, or any other medical personnel in the operating room 100, to move the surgical robot 102 to different locations before, during, and/or after a surgical procedure. The mobile cart 104 enables the surgical robot 102 to be easily transported into and out of the operating room 100. For example, a user 106a may move the surgical robot 102 into the operating room 100 from a storage location. In some implementations, the mobile cart 114 may include wheels, a track system, such as a continuous track propulsion system, or other similar mobility systems for translocation of the cart. The mobile cart 114 may include an attached or embedded handle for locomotion of the mobile cart 114 by an operator (e.g., user 106a).
For safety reasons, the mobile cart 114 may be provided with a stabilization system that may be used during a surgical procedure performed with a surgical robot 102. The stabilization mechanism increases the global stiffness of the mobile cart 114 relative to the floor in order to ensure the accuracy of the surgical procedure. In some implementations, the wheels include a locking mechanism that prevents the cart 114 from moving. The stabilizing, braking, and/or locking mechanism may be activated when the machine is turned on. In some implementations, the mobile cart 114 includes multiple stabilizing, braking, and/or locking mechanisms. In some implementations, the stabilizing mechanism is electro-mechanical with electronic activation. The stabilizing, braking, and/or locking mechanism(s) may be entirely mechanical. The stabilizing, braking, and/or locking mechanism(s) may be electronically activated and deactivated.
In some implementations, the surgical robot 102 includes a robotic arm mounted on a mobile cart 114. An actuator may move the robotic arm. The robotic arm may include a force control end-effector configured to hold a surgical tool. The robot 102 may be configured to control and/or allow positioning and/or movement of the end-effector with at least four degrees of freedom (e.g., six degrees of freedom, three translations and three rotations).
In some implementations, the robotic arm is configured to releasably hold a surgical tool, allowing the surgical tool to be removed and replaced with a second surgical tool. The system may allow the surgical tools to be swapped without re-registration, or with automatic or semi-automatic re-registration of the position of the end-effector.
In some implementations, the surgical system includes a surgical robot 102, a tracking detector 108 that captures the position of the patient and different components of the surgical robot 102, and a display screen 110 that displays, for example, real time patient data and/or real time surgical robot trajectories.
In some implementations, a tracking detector 108 monitors the location of patient 104 and the surgical robot 102. The tracking detector 108 may be a camera, a video camera, an infrared detector, field generator and sensors for electro-magnetic tracking or any other motion detecting apparatus. In some implementation, based on the patient and robot position, the display screen 110 displays a projected trajectory and/or a proposed trajectory for the robotic arm of robot 102 from its current location to a patient operation site. By continuously monitoring the patient 104 and robotic arm positions, using tracking detector 108, the surgical system can calculate updated trajectories and visually display these trajectories on display screen 110 to inform and guide surgeons and/or technicians in the operating room 100 using the surgical robot. In addition, in certain embodiments, the surgical robot 102 may also change its position and automatically position itself based on trajectories calculated from the real time patient and robotic arm positions captured using the tracking detector 108. For instance, the trajectory of the end-effector can be automatically adjusted in real time to account for movement of the vertebrae and/or other part of the patient 104 during the surgical procedure.
An end-effector, such as surgical instrument guide 206, is coupled to the robotic arm 202 for precisely guiding instruments during surgery. For example, the surgical instrument guide 206 may be coupled to the robotic arm via a flange. The surgical instrument guide 206 is configured to hold and/or restrict movement of a surgical instrument (e.g., drill guide 212) therethrough. As shown in
In some implementations, the surgical instrument guide comprising a rigid hollow tubular structure 306 having a first open end 308 and a second open end 310. In some implementations, the tubular structure 306 is a cylindrical structure. The tubular structure 306 has one or more flanges 324a-b that are configured for secure coupling of the guide 300 to an end effector of the robotic surgical system. The tubular structure 306, in some implementations, defines an axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure 306 is restricted. The tubular structure 306 is configured (e.g., an interior surface of the structure 306 is shaped and sized) to permit a tool support to slide through the tubular structure 306 such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the tubular structure 306.
As shown in
The method 800 may include stabilizing the mobile cart (804). For safety reasons, the mobile cart is provided with a stabilization system that may be used during a surgical procedure performed with a surgical robot. The stabilization mechanism increases the global stiffness of the mobile cart relative to the floor in order to ensure the accuracy of the surgical procedure. Once stabilization is engaged, the mobile cart is secured in place on the operating room floor and cannot move.
After stabilizing the mobile cart, the robotic arm is maneuvered to a desired position to align an axis defined by the instrument guide at a desired trajectory in relation to a patient situation (806). As described above, the surgical instrument guide may comprise a rigid hollow tubular structure having a first open end and a second open end. The structure may define the axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted.
The position of the robotic arm and, therefore, the position of the surgical instrument guide is fixed (808) after the robotic arm is maneuvered to the desired position. After the position of the robotic arm is fixed, a surgical instrument is maneuvered in a manner that is constrained by the surgical instrument guide (810). As described above, the surgical instrument may be fitted with a tool support shaped and sized to slide through the surgical instrument guide along the axis defined by the guide. The tubular structure of the surgical instrument guide may have an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide. The tubular structure may include a longitudinal notch along its length that is sized in relation to a peg to (i) permit a marker attached to the tool support via the peg to be viewable by a navigation camera along an entire range of movement of the tool support through the guide, (ii) constrain movement of the navigation marker in a fixed orientation along the axis defined by the guide, and (ii) permit the tool support to slide along the axis defined by the guide while the guide is held in a fixed position by the robotic surgical system.
As described above, the surgical instrument (e.g., the drill) may be fitted with a tool support shaped and sized to slide through the surgical instrument guide along the axis defined by the guide. The tubular structure of the surgical instrument guide may have an interior surface shaped and sized to accommodate the tool support sliding through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide. After drilling through the tool guide, the surgeon places the screw through the drilled hole (908).
In some implementations, the surgical instrument guide comprising a rigid hollow tubular structure 1006 having a first open end and a second open end. In some implementations, the tubular structure 1006 is a cylindrical structure. The tubular structure 1006, in some implementations, defines an axis along which movement of a surgical instrument (fitted with a tool support) sliding through the structure is restricted. The tubular structure 1006 is configured (e.g., an interior surface of the structure 1006 is shaped and sized) to permit a tool support to slide through the guide such that movement of the tool support is constrained in all directions except along the axis defined by the guide.
As shown in
In some implementations, the longitudinal notches 1022a and 1022b are slots. The longitudinal notches 1022a-b, in some implementations, are sized in relation to one or more pegs (e.g., peg 420 as shown in
Among other things, incorporation of two or more notches, such as notches 1022a and 1022b, permits for ambidextrous manipulation of the end effector and/or tool. Moreover, it permits positioning of the robotic surgical system on both sides of the operating room table. Furthermore, it permits positioning of the robotic surgical system on both sides of the operating room table in reference to a navigation system (e.g., tracking camera).
In some implementations, the guide 1000 includes one or more input devices, such as electro-mechanical buttons. For example, the guide 100 may include two electromechanical buttons 1008a and 1008b. In some implementations, the guide 100 includes an activation switch 1060. The activation switch 1060 may be separate from the buttons 1008a and 1008b. The activation switch 1060 may be a presence detection that can be used for enabling movements of the surgical robot. The types of movements may be defined by the buttons 1008a and/or 1008b. The present detection may include a long button that is pressed when a user grabs the handle (e.g., to thereby move the handle). In some implementations, the activation switch detects the presence of a hand on the handle.
In some implementations, a user may use the one or more input devices to select to enter a translation mode, positioning mode, axis rotation mode, axis insertion mode and/or axis position mode. In some implementations, the guide 1000 includes an enabling button, rotation button and/or a translation button. In some implementations, the enabling button must be selected with one or more other buttons to enable movement of the end effector. For example, to rotate the end effector, the user may need to select the enabling button and the rotation button. Similarly, to enable translations of the end effector, the user may need to select the enabling button and the translations button. In some implementations, the end effector may enter a course positioning mode when a user selects the enabling button, translations button, or rotations button. In some implementations, selection of the enabling button causes the robotic arm to enter the positioning mode in which the user is able to position the tool appropriately and allows the operator to freely move the robotic arm (e.g., via course movements).
Selection of the translation mode allows, in some implementations, the end effector to be moved along a plane (e.g., a plan in line with the end of a tool such as a drill guide). An operator may use the translation mode to make fine movements with the end effector and to find an entry point. Selection of the rotation mode locks movement of the end effector except rotations (e.g., the manipulator may only be rotated). In some implementations, activation of the rotation mode permits an operator to make fine rotations around an entry point. In axis rotation mode an operator may rotate the end effector around a specific axis (e.g., the axis formed by a drill guide). In axis position mode, an operator may move the end effector without changing an axis (e.g., the axis formed by a drill guide). In axis insertion mode, an operator may move the end effector along a trajectory.
The various positioning modes allow an operator to quickly and accurately move the end effector to a desired position (e.g., on or along a determined trajectory). When all of the buttons are released, in some implementations, the robot actively holds the position of the end effector. For example, if a drill guide is coupled to the end effector, an operator may insert a drill into the drill guide without moving the position of the end effector or drill guide. Thus, after carefully positioning the drill guide along a desired trajectory, an operator may accurately drill along the desired trajectory.
An intermediate lock 1032 may be placed at an initial distance 1034, such as 80 mm, from an entry of the guiding tube 1006. In some implementations, the initial distance is 80 mm. In some implementations, the initial distance is between 70-90 mm, 60-80 mm, or 80-100 mm. In some implementations, the initial distance corresponds to the length of the longest pedicle screws used with a small amount of margin) e.g., 5, 10, 15, or 20 mm of margin). In some implementations, the intermediate lock 1032 is a unidirectional lock that only blocks insertion movement. In some implementations, the initial distance 1034 is long enough to allow guidance of the inserted instrument when intermediate lock 1032 is in the locked position. For example, the initial distance, in some implementations, is 30 mm. In some implementations, the initial distance is between 25-25 mm, 20-40 mm, or 35-50 mm. In some implementations, the intermediate lock 1032 is a bidirectional lock that blocks insertion and removal of the surgical instrument.
When the intermediate lock 1032 is released (e.g., unlocked), the surgical instrument may be slide further into the guide. In some implementations, the insertion distance 1036 (e.g., distance the surgical instrument can move forward after the intermediate lock 1032 is released) is selected to allow sufficient guidance of the surgical instrument inside the vertebrae. In some implementations, the insertion distance is 80 mm. In some implementations, the insertion distance is between 70-90 mm, 60-80 mm, or 80-100 mm. This may be defined by the type of surgery and may be, for example, the length of a pedicle screw with some margin (e.g., 40-80 mm of total travel; e.g., 55, 60, 65, 70, or 75 mm total). The intermediate lock 1032 may be implemented using a variety of mechanisms. The intermediate lock 1032 may be a spring lock (e.g., a button that is pressed through a hole on the guide by a spring when the instrument is slide into a particular position). The intermediate lock 1032 may be a small device that blocks the movement of the tool inside the guide 1006. For example, the intermediate lock 1032 may block the peg (e.g., 420 as shown in
In some implementations, the robot generates movement of the tube 1006 in response to the position of the instrument (e.g., to achieve movement along a desired trajectory). The movement may be generated only when the surgical instrument is at the extremities of the tube 1006 (e.g., at either end of the notch 1022). The combination of these features and the ability to combine movement of the instrument inside the guiding tube 1006 and guidance of the tube 1006 by the robot to provides the ability to obtain long and complicated trajectories using simple and short surgical instrument guide tubes (e.g., 1006) held by the robot.
The end lock 1052 may be a spring lock (e.g., a button that is pressed through a hole on the guide by a spring when the instrument is slide into a particular position). The end lock 1052 may be a small device that blocks the movement of the tool inside the guide 1006. For example, the end lock 1052 may block the peg (e.g., 420 as shown in
The method 1200 may include moving a mobile cart transporting a robotic surgical system comprising a robotic arm in proximity to an operating table and stabilizing the mobile cart (1208). A first surgical instrument may be inserted into the guiding tube until locked in place by the intermediate lock (1210). This allows the robotic arm to be moved while holding the surgical instrument in place. In some implementations, the lock restricts the instrument from being slide past a present position. In some implementations, the lock prevents the instrument from being removed. Various embodiments of the lock are discussed in relation to
After inserting the surgical instrument, the trajectory may be located (1212). Once the trajectory is located, the instrument may be advanced along the trajectory using robot control (1214). The intermediate lock may be released and the robot may be placed in a holding position mode such that movement of the instrument is restricted along the trajectory, thus allowing a surgeon to manually prepare a hole for a screw (1216). After preparing the hole, the first surgical instrument may be removed from the guidance tube (1218). A second surgical instrument may be inserted after the first instrument is removed. In some implementations, before placing an implant, the user may tap the hole. In some implementations, a self-tapping screw is used directly without drilling. An implant may be inserted through the guiding tube and fixed to the patient anatomy (1220). After fixing the implant to the patient anatomy, the surgeon may move to another trajectory (1222).
The method 1300 may include moving a mobile cart transporting a robotic surgical system comprising a robotic arm in proximity to an operating table and stabilizing the mobile cart (1306). A first surgical instrument may be inserted into the guiding tube until locked in place by the intermediate lock (1308). This allows the robotic arm to be moved while holding the surgical instrument in place. In some implementations, the lock restricts the instrument from being slide past a present position. In some implementations, the lock prevents the instrument from being removed. Various embodiments of the lock are discussed in relation to
After inserting the surgical instrument, the trajectory may be located and saved (1310). After saving the trajectory, the vertebra may be manually accessed (1312). The surgical instrument may be brought back to the trajectory (1314). This may be done manually by the surgeon. In some implementations, the surgeon may be assisted and/or guided by the robot to ensure that the instrument is returned to the correct trajectory. For example, an example assistance is the use of a “magnetic” effect which drags the instrument to the correct trajectory and locks it when it is on the correct trajectory.
After aligning the instrument with the trajectory, the instrument may be advanced along the trajectory (1316). The intermediate lock may be released and the robot may be placed in a holding position mode such that movement of the instrument is restricted along the trajectory, thus allowing a surgeon to manually prepare a hole for a screw (1318). After preparing the hole, the first surgical instrument may be removed from the guidance tube (1320). A second surgical instrument may be inserted after the first instrument is removed. An implant may be inserted through the guiding tube and fixed to the patient anatomy (1322). After fixing the implant to the patient anatomy, the surgeon may move to another trajectory (1324).
As shown in
The cloud computing environment 1400 may include a resource manager 1406. The resource manager 1406 may be connected to the resource providers 1402 and the computing devices 1404 over the computer network 1408. In some implementations, the resource manager 1406 may facilitate the provision of computing resources by one or more resource providers 1402 to one or more computing devices 1404. The resource manager 1406 may receive a request for a computing resource from a particular computing device 1404. The resource manager 1406 may identify one or more resource providers 1402 capable of providing the computing resource requested by the computing device 1404. The resource manager 1406 may select a resource provider 1402 to provide the computing resource. The resource manager 1406 may facilitate a connection between the resource provider 1402 and a particular computing device 1404. In some implementations, the resource manager 1406 may establish a connection between a particular resource provider 1402 and a particular computing device 1404. In some implementations, the resource manager 1406 may redirect a particular computing device 1404 to a particular resource provider 1402 with the requested computing resource.
The computing device 1500 includes a processor 1502, a memory 1504, a storage device 1506, a high-speed interface 1508 connecting to the memory 1504 and multiple high-speed expansion ports 1510, and a low-speed interface 1512 connecting to a low-speed expansion port 1514 and the storage device 1506. Each of the processor 1502, the memory 1504, the storage device 1506, the high-speed interface 1508, the high-speed expansion ports 1510, and the low-speed interface 1512, are interconnected using various busses, and may be mounted on a common motherboard or in other manners as appropriate. The processor 1502 can process instructions for execution within the computing device 1500, including instructions stored in the memory 1504 or on the storage device 1506 to display graphical information for a GUI on an external input/output device, such as a display 1516 coupled to the high-speed interface 1508. In other implementations, multiple processors and/or multiple buses may be used, as appropriate, along with multiple memories and types of memory. Also, multiple computing devices may be connected, with each device providing portions of the necessary operations (e.g., as a server bank, a group of blade servers, or a multi-processor system).
The memory 1504 stores information within the computing device 1500. In some implementations, the memory 1504 is a volatile memory unit or units. In some implementations, the memory 1504 is a non-volatile memory unit or units. The memory 1504 may also be another form of computer-readable medium, such as a magnetic or optical disk.
The storage device 1506 is capable of providing mass storage for the computing device 1500. In some implementations, the storage device 1506 may be or contain a computer-readable medium, such as a floppy disk device, a hard disk device, an optical disk device, or a tape device, a flash memory or other similar solid state memory device, or an array of devices, including devices in a storage area network or other configurations. Instructions can be stored in an information carrier. The instructions, when executed by one or more processing devices (for example, processor 1502), perform one or more methods, such as those described above. The instructions can also be stored by one or more storage devices such as computer- or machine-readable mediums (for example, the memory 1504, the storage device 1506, or memory on the processor 1502).
The high-speed interface 1508 manages bandwidth-intensive operations for the computing device 1500, while the low-speed interface 1512 manages lower bandwidth-intensive operations. Such allocation of functions is an example only. In some implementations, the high-speed interface 1508 is coupled to the memory 1504, the display 1516 (e.g., through a graphics processor or accelerator), and to the high-speed expansion ports 1510, which may accept various expansion cards (not shown). In the implementation, the low-speed interface 1512 is coupled to the storage device 1506 and the low-speed expansion port 1514. The low-speed expansion port 1514, which may include various communication ports (e.g., USB, Bluetooth®, Ethernet, wireless Ethernet) may be coupled to one or more input/output devices, such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a scanner, or a networking device such as a switch or router, e.g., through a network adapter.
The computing device 1500 may be implemented in a number of different forms, as shown in the figure. For example, it may be implemented as a standard server 1520, or multiple times in a group of such servers. In addition, it may be implemented in a personal computer such as a laptop computer 1522. It may also be implemented as part of a rack server system 1524. Alternatively, components from the computing device 1500 may be combined with other components in a mobile device (not shown), such as a mobile computing device 1550. Each of such devices may contain one or more of the computing device 1500 and the mobile computing device 1550, and an entire system may be made up of multiple computing devices communicating with each other.
The mobile computing device 1550 includes a processor 1552, a memory 1564, an input/output device such as a display 1554, a communication interface 1566, and a transceiver 1568, among other components. The mobile computing device 1550 may also be provided with a storage device, such as a micro-drive or other device, to provide additional storage. Each of the processor 1552, the memory 1564, the display 1554, the communication interface 1566, and the transceiver 1568, are interconnected using various buses, and several of the components may be mounted on a common motherboard or in other manners as appropriate.
The processor 1552 can execute instructions within the mobile computing device 1550, including instructions stored in the memory 1564. The processor 1552 may be implemented as a chipset of chips that include separate and multiple analog and digital processors. The processor 1552 may provide, for example, for coordination of the other components of the mobile computing device 1550, such as control of user interfaces, applications run by the mobile computing device 1550, and wireless communication by the mobile computing device 1550.
The processor 1552 may communicate with a user through a control interface 1558 and a display interface 1556 coupled to the display 1554. The display 1554 may be, for example, a TFT (Thin-Film-Transistor Liquid Crystal Display) display or an OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) display, or other appropriate display technology. The display interface 1556 may comprise appropriate circuitry for driving the display 1554 to present graphical and other information to a user. The control interface 1558 may receive commands from a user and convert them for submission to the processor 1552. In addition, an external interface 1562 may provide communication with the processor 1552, so as to enable near area communication of the mobile computing device 1550 with other devices. The external interface 1562 may provide, for example, for wired communication in some implementations, or for wireless communication in other implementations, and multiple interfaces may also be used.
The memory 1564 stores information within the mobile computing device 1550. The memory 1564 can be implemented as one or more of a computer-readable medium or media, a volatile memory unit or units, or a non-volatile memory unit or units. An expansion memory 1574 may also be provided and connected to the mobile computing device 1550 through an expansion interface 1572, which may include, for example, a SIMM (Single In Line Memory Module) card interface. The expansion memory 1574 may provide extra storage space for the mobile computing device 1550, or may also store applications or other information for the mobile computing device 1550. Specifically, the expansion memory 1574 may include instructions to carry out or supplement the processes described above, and may include secure information also. Thus, for example, the expansion memory 1574 may be provided as a security module for the mobile computing device 1550, and may be programmed with instructions that permit secure use of the mobile computing device 1550. In addition, secure applications may be provided via the SIMM cards, along with additional information, such as placing identifying information on the SIMM card in a non-hackable manner.
The memory may include, for example, flash memory and/or NVRAM memory (non-volatile random access memory), as discussed below. In some implementations, instructions are stored in an information carrier and, when executed by one or more processing devices (for example, processor 1552), perform one or more methods, such as those described above. The instructions can also be stored by one or more storage devices, such as one or more computer- or machine-readable mediums (for example, the memory 1564, the expansion memory 1574, or memory on the processor 1552). In some implementations, the instructions can be received in a propagated signal, for example, over the transceiver 1568 or the external interface 1562.
The mobile computing device 1550 may communicate wirelessly through the communication interface 1566, which may include digital signal processing circuitry where necessary. The communication interface 1566 may provide for communications under various modes or protocols, such as GSM voice calls (Global System for Mobile communications), SMS (Short Message Service), EMS (Enhanced Messaging Service), or MMS messaging (Multimedia Messaging Service), CDMA (code division multiple access), TDMA (time division multiple access), PDC (Personal Digital Cellular), WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access), CDMA2000, or GPRS (General Packet Radio Service), among others. Such communication may occur, for example, through the transceiver 1568 using a radio-frequency. In addition, short-range communication may occur, such as using a Bluetooth®, Wi-Fi™, or other such transceiver (not shown). In addition, a GPS (Global Positioning System) receiver module 1570 may provide additional navigation- and location-related wireless data to the mobile computing device 1550, which may be used as appropriate by applications running on the mobile computing device 1550.
The mobile computing device 1550 may also communicate audibly using an audio codec 1560, which may receive spoken information from a user and convert it to usable digital information. The audio codec 1560 may likewise generate audible sound for a user, such as through a speaker, e.g., in a handset of the mobile computing device 1550. Such sound may include sound from voice telephone calls, may include recorded sound (e.g., voice messages, music files, etc.) and may also include sound generated by applications operating on the mobile computing device 1550.
The mobile computing device 1550 may be implemented in a number of different forms, as shown in the figure. For example, it may be implemented as a cellular telephone 1580. It may also be implemented as part of a smart-phone 1582, personal digital assistant, or other similar mobile device.
Various implementations of the systems and techniques described here can be realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry, specially designed ASICs (application specific integrated circuits), computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof. These various implementations can include implementation in one or more computer programs that are executable and/or interpretable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which may be special or general purpose, coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device.
These computer programs (also known as programs, software, software applications or code) include machine instructions for a programmable processor, and can be implemented in a high-level procedural and/or object-oriented programming language, and/or in assembly/machine language. As used herein, the terms machine-readable medium and computer-readable medium refer to any computer program product, apparatus and/or device (e.g., magnetic discs, optical disks, memory, Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs)) used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor, including a machine-readable medium that receives machine instructions as a machine-readable signal. The term machine-readable signal refers to any signal used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor.
To provide for interaction with a user, the systems and techniques described here can be implemented on a computer having a display device (e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor) for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device (e.g., a mouse or a trackball) by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback (e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback); and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.
The systems and techniques described here can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back end component (e.g., as a data server), or that includes a middleware component (e.g., an application server), or that includes a front end component (e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the systems and techniques described here), or any combination of such back end, middleware, or front end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and the Internet.
The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.
In view of the structure, functions and apparatus of the systems and methods described here, in some implementations, a system and method for performing surgery with a robotic surgical system are provided. Having described certain implementations of methods and apparatus for supporting a robotic surgical system, it will now become apparent to one of skill in the art that other implementations incorporating the concepts of the disclosure may be used. Therefore, the disclosure should not be limited to certain implementations, but rather should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the following claims.
Throughout the description, where apparatus and systems are described as having, including, or comprising specific components, or where processes and methods are described as having, including, or comprising specific steps, it is contemplated that, additionally, there are apparatus, and systems of the disclosed technology that consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited components, and that there are processes and methods according to the disclosed technology that consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited processing steps.
It should be understood that the order of steps or order for performing certain action is immaterial so long as the disclosed technology remains operable. Moreover, two or more steps or actions may be conducted simultaneously.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/671,274 filed on Aug. 8, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/996,115 filed on Jan. 14, 2016, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/597,883 filed on Jan. 15, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/927,894, filed Jan. 15, 2014; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/935,281, filed Feb. 3, 2014; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/953,609, filed Mar. 14, 2014, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1068626 | Buck | Jul 1913 | A |
| 4150293 | Franke | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4737038 | Dostoomian | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4757710 | Haynes | Jul 1988 | A |
| 5246010 | Gazzara et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5354314 | Hardy et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5397323 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5598453 | Baba et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5772594 | Barrick | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5791908 | Gillio | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5820559 | Ng et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825982 | Wright et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5887121 | Funda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5911449 | Daniele et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5951475 | Gueziec et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5987960 | Messner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6012216 | Esteves et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6031888 | Ivan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033415 | Mittelstadt et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6080181 | Jensen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6106511 | Jensen | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6122541 | Cosman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6144875 | Schweikard et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157853 | Blume et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167145 | Foley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167292 | Badano et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6201984 | Funda et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203196 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6205411 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212419 | Blume et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6231565 | Tovey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236875 | Bucholz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246900 | Cosman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6301495 | Gueziec et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306126 | Montezuma | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314311 | Williams et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6320929 | Von Der Haar | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322567 | Mittelstadt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6325808 | Bernard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6340363 | Bolger et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6377011 | Ben-Ur | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379302 | Kessman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6402762 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6447503 | Wynne et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451027 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6477400 | Barrick | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6484049 | Seeley et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487267 | Wolter | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6490467 | Bucholz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6490475 | Seeley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499488 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6501981 | Schweikard et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6507751 | Blume et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6535756 | Simon et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6560354 | Maurer, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565554 | Niemeyer | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6587750 | Gerbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6614453 | Suri et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6614871 | Kobiki et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6619840 | Rasche et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6636757 | Jascob et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6645196 | Nixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6666579 | Jensen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669635 | Kessman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6701173 | Nowinski et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6757068 | Foxlin | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6782287 | Grzeszczuk et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6783524 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6786896 | Madhani et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6788018 | Blumenkranz | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6804581 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6823207 | Jensen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6827351 | Graziani et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6837892 | Shoham | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6839612 | Sanchez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6856826 | Seeley et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6856827 | Seeley et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6879880 | Nowlin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6892090 | Verard et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6920347 | Simon et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6922632 | Foxlin | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6968224 | Kessman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6978166 | Foley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6988009 | Grimm et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991627 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6996487 | Jutras et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6999852 | Green | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7007699 | Martinelli et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016457 | Senzig et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7043961 | Pandey et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7062006 | Pelc et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7063705 | Young et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7072707 | Galloway, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7083615 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7097640 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099428 | Clinthorne et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7108421 | Gregerson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7130676 | Barrick | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7139418 | Abovitz et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7139601 | Bucholz et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7155316 | Sutherland et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7164968 | Treat et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7167738 | Schweikard et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7169141 | Brock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7172627 | Fiere et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7194120 | Wicker et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197107 | Arai et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7231014 | Levy | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7231063 | Naimark et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7239940 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248914 | Hastings et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7301648 | Foxlin | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7302288 | Schellenberg | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7313430 | Urquhart et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7318805 | Schweikard et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7318827 | Leitner et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7319897 | Leitner et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7324623 | Heuscher et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7327865 | Fu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7331967 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333642 | Green | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7339341 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7366562 | Dukesherer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7379790 | Toth et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7386365 | Nixon | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7422592 | Morley et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7435216 | Kwon et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7440793 | Chauhan et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7460637 | Clinthorne et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7466303 | Yi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7493153 | Ahmed et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7505617 | Fu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7533892 | Schena et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542791 | Mire et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7555331 | Viswanathan | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7567834 | Clayton et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7594912 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7606613 | Simon et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7607440 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7623902 | Pacheco | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7630752 | Viswanathan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7630753 | Simon et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7643862 | Schoenefeld | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7660623 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7661881 | Gregerson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7683331 | Chang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7683332 | Chang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689320 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7691098 | Wallace et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7702379 | Avinash et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7702477 | Tuemmler et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7711083 | Heigl et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7711406 | Kuhn et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720523 | Omernick et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7725253 | Foxlin | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7726171 | Langlotz et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742801 | Neubauer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7751865 | Jascob et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7760849 | Zhang | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7762825 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7763015 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7787699 | Mahesh et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7796728 | Bergfjord | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7813838 | Sommer | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7818044 | Dukesherer et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7819859 | Prisco et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7824401 | Manzo et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7831294 | Viswanathan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7834484 | Sartor | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7835557 | Kendrick et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7835778 | Foley et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7835784 | Mire et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7840253 | Tremblay et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7840256 | Lakin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7843158 | Prisco | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7844320 | Shahidi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7853305 | Simon et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7853313 | Thompson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7865269 | Prisco et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| D631966 | Perloff et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
| 7879045 | Gielen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7881767 | Strommer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7881770 | Melkent et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7886743 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| RE42194 | Foley et al. | Mar 2011 | E |
| RE42226 | Foley et al. | Mar 2011 | E |
| 7900524 | Calloway et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7907166 | Lamprecht et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7909122 | Schena et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7925653 | Saptharishi | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7930065 | Larkin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7935130 | Willliams | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7940999 | Liao et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7945012 | Ye et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7945021 | Shapiro et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7953470 | Vetter et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7954397 | Choi et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7971341 | Dukesherer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7974674 | Hauck et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7974677 | Mire et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7974681 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7979157 | Anvari | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7983733 | Viswanathan | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7988215 | Seibold | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7996110 | Lipow et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8004121 | Sartor | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8004229 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8010177 | Csavoy et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8019045 | Kato | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8021310 | Sanborn et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8035685 | Jensen | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8046054 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8046057 | Clarke | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8052688 | Wolf, II | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8054184 | Cline et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8054752 | Druke et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8057397 | Li et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8057407 | Martinelli et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062288 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062375 | Glerum et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8066524 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8073335 | Labonville et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8079950 | Stern et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086299 | Adler et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8092370 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8098914 | Liao et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8100950 | St. Clair et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8105320 | Manzo | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8108025 | Csavoy et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8109877 | Moctezuma de la Barrera et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8112292 | Simon | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8116430 | Shapiro et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8120301 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8121249 | Wang et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8123675 | Funda et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8133229 | Bonutti | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8142420 | Schena | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8147494 | Leitner et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8150494 | Simon et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8150497 | Gielen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8150498 | Gielen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8165658 | Waynik et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8170313 | Kendrick et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8179073 | Farritor et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8182476 | Julian et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8184880 | Zhao et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8202278 | Orban, III et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8208708 | Homan et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8208988 | Jensen | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8219177 | Smith et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8219178 | Smith et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8220468 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224024 | Foxlin et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224484 | Swarup et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225798 | Baldwin et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8228368 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8231610 | Jo et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8263933 | Hartmann et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8239001 | Verard et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8241271 | Millman et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8248413 | Gattani et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8256319 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271069 | Jascob et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271130 | Hourtash | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8281670 | Larkin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8282653 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8301226 | Csavoy et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8311611 | Csavoy et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8320991 | Jascob et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8332012 | Kienzle, III | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8333755 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8335552 | Stiles | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8335557 | Maschke | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8348931 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8353963 | Glerum | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8358818 | Miga et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8359730 | Burg et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8374673 | Adcox et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8374723 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8379791 | Forthmann et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8386019 | Camus et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8392022 | Ortmaier et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8394099 | Patwardhan | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8395342 | Prisco | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8398634 | Manzo et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8400094 | Schena | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8414957 | Enzerink et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8418073 | Mohr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8450694 | Baviera et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8452447 | Nixon | May 2013 | B2 |
| RE44305 | Foley et al. | Jun 2013 | E |
| 8462911 | Vesel et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8465476 | Rogers et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8465771 | Wan et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8467851 | Mire et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8467852 | Csavoy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8469947 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| RE44392 | Hynes | Jul 2013 | E |
| 8483434 | Buehner et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8483800 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8486532 | Enzerink et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8489235 | Moll et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8500722 | Cooper | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8500728 | Newton et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8504201 | Moll et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8506555 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8506556 | Schena | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8508173 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8512318 | Tovey et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8515576 | Lipow et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8518120 | Glerum et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8521331 | Itkowitz | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8526688 | Groszmann et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8526700 | Isaacs | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8527094 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8528440 | Morley et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8532741 | Heruth et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8541970 | Nowlin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8548563 | Simon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8549732 | Burg et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8551114 | Ramos de la Pena | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8551116 | Julian et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556807 | Scott et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556979 | Glerum et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8560118 | Greer et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8561473 | Blumenkranz | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8562594 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8571638 | Shoham | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8571710 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8573465 | Shelton, IV | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8574303 | Sharkey | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8585420 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8594841 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8597198 | Sanborn et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8600478 | Verard et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8603077 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8611985 | Lavallee et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8613230 | Blumenkranz et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8621939 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8624537 | Nowlin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8630389 | Kato | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8634897 | Simon et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8634957 | Toth et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8638056 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8638057 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8639000 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8641726 | Bonutti | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8644907 | Hartmann et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8657809 | Schoepp | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8660635 | Simon et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8666544 | Moll et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8675939 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8678647 | Gregerson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8679125 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8679183 | Glerum et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8682413 | Lloyd | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8684253 | Giordano et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8685098 | Glerum et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8693730 | Umasuthan et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8694075 | Groszmann et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8696458 | Foxlin et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8700123 | Okamura et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8706086 | Glerum | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8706185 | Foley et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8706301 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8717430 | Simon et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8727618 | Maschke et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8734432 | Tuma et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8738115 | Amberg et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8738181 | Greer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8740882 | Jun et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8746252 | McGrogan et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8749189 | Nowlin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8749190 | Nowlin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8761930 | Nixon | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8764448 | Yang et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8771170 | Mesallum et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781186 | Clements et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781630 | Banks et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8784385 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8786241 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8787520 | Baba | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8792704 | Isaacs | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8798231 | Notohara et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8800838 | Shelton, IV | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8808164 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8812077 | Dempsey | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8814793 | Brabrand | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8816628 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8818105 | Myronenko et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8820605 | Shelton, IV | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8821511 | Von Jako et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8823308 | Nowlin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8827996 | Scott et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8828024 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8830224 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8834489 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8834490 | Bonutti | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8838270 | Druke et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8844789 | Shelton, IV et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855822 | Bartol et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8858598 | Seifert et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8860753 | Bhandarkar et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8864751 | Prisco et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8864798 | Weiman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8864833 | Glerum et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8867703 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8870880 | Himmelberger et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8876866 | Zappacosta et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8880223 | Raj et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8882803 | Iott et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8883210 | Truncale et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
| 8888821 | Rezach et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8888853 | Glerum et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8888854 | Glerum et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8894652 | Seifert et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8894688 | Suh | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8894691 | Iott et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8906069 | Hansell et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8964934 | Ein-Gal | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8992580 | Bar et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8996169 | Lightcap et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9001963 | Sowards-Emmerd et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9002076 | Khadem et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9005113 | Scott et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9044190 | Rubner et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9107683 | Hourtash et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9125556 | Zehavi et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9131986 | Greer et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9215968 | Schostek et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9271633 | Scott et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9308050 | Kostrzewski et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9380984 | Li et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9393039 | Lechner et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9398886 | Gregerson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9398890 | Dong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9414859 | Ballard et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9420975 | Gutfleisch et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9492235 | Hourtash et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9565997 | Scott et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9592096 | Maillet et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9750465 | Engel et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9757203 | Hourtash et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9795354 | Menegaz et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9814535 | Bar et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9820783 | Donner et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9833265 | Donner et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9848922 | Tohmeh et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9925011 | Gombert et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9931025 | Graetzel et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| 9962069 | Scott et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10034717 | Miller et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 20010036302 | Miller | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020035321 | Bucholz et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20040068172 | Nowinski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040076259 | Jensen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143651 | Verard et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171558 | Abovitz et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060100610 | Wallace et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173329 | Marquart et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184396 | Dennis et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241416 | Marquart et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291612 | Nishide et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070015987 | Benlloch Baviera et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021738 | Hasser et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038059 | Sheffer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073133 | Schoenefeld | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156121 | Millman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156157 | Nahum et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167712 | Keglovich et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233238 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004523 | Jensen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080013809 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033283 | Dellaca et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082109 | Moll et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108912 | Node-Langlois | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108991 | Von Jako | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109012 | Falco et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144906 | Allred et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161680 | Von Jako et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161682 | Kendrick et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177203 | von Jako | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080214922 | Hartmann et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228068 | Viswanathan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228196 | Wang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235052 | Node-Langlois et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269596 | Revie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080287771 | Anderson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080287781 | Revie et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300477 | Lloyd et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300478 | Zuhars et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080302950 | Park et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080306490 | Lakin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319311 | Hamadeh | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090012509 | Csavoy et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030428 | Omori et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090080737 | Battle et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090185655 | Koken et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198121 | Hoheisel | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216113 | Meier et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228019 | Gross et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259123 | Navab et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259230 | Khadem et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090264899 | Appenrodt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281417 | Hartmann et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100022874 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100039506 | Sarvestani et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125286 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100130986 | Mailloux et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228117 | Hartmann | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228265 | Prisco | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249571 | Jensen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274120 | Heuscher | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280363 | Skarda et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100331858 | Simaan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110022229 | Jang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077504 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098553 | Robbins et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137152 | Li | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213384 | Jeong | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224684 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224685 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224686 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224687 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224688 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224689 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224825 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110230967 | O'Halloran et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238080 | Ranjit et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276058 | Choi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282189 | Graumann | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286573 | Schretter et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295062 | Gratacos Solsona et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295370 | Suh et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110306986 | Lee et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120035507 | George et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120046668 | Gantes | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120051498 | Koishi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120053597 | Anvari et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120059248 | Holsing et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120071753 | Hunter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108954 | Schulhauser et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136372 | Amat Girbau et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120143084 | Shoham | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120184839 | Woerlein | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197182 | Millman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226145 | Chang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235909 | Birkenbach et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245596 | Meenink | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120253332 | Moll | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120253360 | White et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120256092 | Zingerman | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120294498 | Popovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296203 | Hartmann et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130006267 | Odermatt et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130016889 | Myronenko et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130030571 | Ruiz Morales et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130035583 | Park et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060146 | Yang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060337 | Petersheim et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130094742 | Feilkas | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130096574 | Kang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130113791 | Isaacs et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116706 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131695 | Scarfogliero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130144307 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158542 | Manzo et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165937 | Patwardhan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178867 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178868 | Roh | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178870 | Schena | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204271 | Brisson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211419 | Jensen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211420 | Jensen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130218142 | Tuma et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130223702 | Holsing et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130225942 | Holsing et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130225943 | Holsing et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130231556 | Holsing et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130237995 | Lee et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245375 | DiMaio et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261640 | Kim et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130272488 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130272489 | Dickman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274761 | Devengenzo et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130281821 | Liu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130296884 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130303887 | Holsing et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130307955 | Deitz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317521 | Choi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325033 | Schena et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325035 | Hauck et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331686 | Freysinger et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331858 | Devengenzo et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331861 | Yoon | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130342578 | Isaacs | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130345717 | Markvicka et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130345757 | Stad | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140001235 | Shelton, IV | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140012131 | Heruth et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140031664 | Kang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140046128 | Lee et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140046132 | Hoeg et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140046340 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140049629 | Siewerdsen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140058406 | Tsekos | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140073914 | Lavallee et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140080086 | Chen | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140081128 | Verard et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140088612 | Bartol et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094694 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094851 | Gordon | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140096369 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100587 | Farritor et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140121676 | Kostrzewski et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140128882 | Kwak et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135796 | Simon et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142592 | Moon et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148692 | Hartmann et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140163581 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171781 | Stiles | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171900 | Stiles | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171965 | Loh et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180308 | von Grunberg | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180309 | Seeber et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140187915 | Yaroshenko et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140188132 | Kang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194699 | Roh et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130810 | Azizian et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140221819 | Sarment | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140222023 | Kim et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140228631 | Kwak et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140234804 | Huang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257328 | Kim et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257329 | Jang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257330 | Choi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275760 | Lee et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275955 | Crawford | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275985 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276931 | Parihar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276940 | Seo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276944 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288413 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140299648 | Shelton, IV et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303434 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303643 | Ha et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140305995 | Shelton, IV et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309659 | Roh et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316436 | Bar et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140323803 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324070 | Min et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330288 | Date et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140364720 | Darrow et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140371577 | Maillet et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150039034 | Frankel et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150085970 | Bouhnik et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150146847 | Liu | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150150524 | Yorkston et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150196261 | Funk | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150213633 | Chang et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150335480 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150342647 | Frankel et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160005194 | Schretter et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160166329 | Langan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160235480 | Scholl et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160249990 | Glozman et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160302871 | Gregerson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160320322 | Suzuki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160331335 | Gregerson et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170135770 | Scholl et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170143284 | Sehnert et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170143426 | Isaacs et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170156816 | Ibrahim | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170202629 | Maillet et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170212723 | Atarot et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170215825 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170215826 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170215827 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170231710 | Scholl et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170258426 | Risher-Kelly et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170273748 | Hourtash et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296277 | Hourtash et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170360493 | Zucher et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180228351 | Scott et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| US 8,231,638 B2, 07/2012, Swarup et al. (withdrawn) |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200146696 A1 | May 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61953609 | Mar 2014 | US | |
| 61935281 | Feb 2014 | US | |
| 61927894 | Jan 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15671274 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Child | 16734447 | US | |
| Parent | 14996115 | Jan 2016 | US |
| Child | 15671274 | US | |
| Parent | 14597883 | Jan 2015 | US |
| Child | 14996115 | US |
