Field of the Invention
The field of the invention is data processing, or, more specifically, methods and apparatus for operation of a multi-slice processor.
Description of Related Art
The development of the EDVAC computer system of 1948 is often cited as the beginning of the computer era. Since that time, computer systems have evolved into extremely complicated devices. Today's computers are much more sophisticated than early systems such as the EDVAC. Computer systems typically include a combination of hardware and software components, application programs, operating systems, processors, buses, memory, input/output devices, and so on. As advances in semiconductor processing and computer architecture push the performance of the computer higher and higher, more sophisticated computer software has evolved to take advantage of the higher performance of the hardware, resulting in computer systems today that are much more powerful than just a few years ago.
One area of computer system technology that has advanced is computer processors. As the number of computer systems in data centers and the number of mobile computing devices has increased, the need for more efficient computer processors has also increased. Speed of operation and power consumption are just two areas of computer processor technology that affect efficiency of computer processors.
Methods and apparatus for operation of a multi-slice processor are disclosed in this specification. Such a multi-slice processor includes a plurality of execution slices and a plurality of load/store slices, where the load/store slices are coupled to the execution slices via a results bus. Such a multi-slice processor may further include a load/store slice comprising a load miss queue and a load reorder queue. Operation of such a multi-slice processor includes: receiving, at a load reorder queue, a load instruction requesting data; responsive to the data not being stored in a data cache, determining whether a previous load instruction is pending a fetch of a cache line comprising the data; if the cache line does not comprise the data, allocating an entry for the load instruction in the load miss queue; and if the cache line does comprise the data: merging, in the load reorder queue, the load instruction with an entry for the previous load instruction.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular descriptions of exemplary embodiments of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numbers generally represent like parts of exemplary embodiments of the invention.
Exemplary methods and apparatus for operation of a multi-slice processor in accordance with the present invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings, beginning with
The computer (152) of
The example computer processor (156) of
The example multi-slice processor (156) of
Although the multi-slice processor (156) in the example of
Stored in RAM (168) in the example computer (152) is a data processing application (102), a module of computer program instructions that when executed by the multi-slice processor (156) may provide any number of data processing tasks. Examples of such data processing applications may include a word processing application, a spreadsheet application, a database management application, a media library application, a web server application, and so on as will occur to readers of skill in the art. Also stored in RAM (168) is an operating system (154). Operating systems useful in computers configured for operation of a multi-slice processor according to embodiments of the present invention include UNIX™, Linux™, Microsoft Windows™, AIX™, IBM's z/OS™, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. The operating system (154) and data processing application (102) in the example of
The computer (152) of
The example computer (152) of
The exemplary computer (152) of
The arrangement of computers and other devices making up the exemplary system illustrated in
For further explanation,
The multi-slice processor in the example of
The general purpose registers (206) are configured to store the youngest instruction targeting a particular logical register and the result of the execution of the instruction. A logical register is an abstraction of a physical register that enables out-of-order execution of instructions that target the same physical register.
When a younger instruction targeting the same particular logical register is received, the entry in the general purpose register is moved to the history buffer, and the entry in the general purpose register is replaced by the younger instruction. The history buffer (208) may be configured to store many instructions targeting the same logical register. That is, the general purpose register is generally configured to store a single, youngest instruction for each logical register while the history buffer may store many, non-youngest instructions for each logical register.
Each execution slice (204) of the multi-slice processor of
The arithmetic logic unit (212) depicted in the example of
The results bus (220) may be configured in a variety of manners and be of composed in a variety of sizes. In some instances, each execution slice may be configured to provide results on a single bus line of the results bus (220). In a similar manner, each load/store slice may be configured to provide results on a single bus line of the results bus (220). In such a configuration, a multi-slice processor with four processor slices may have a results bus with eight bus lines—four bus lines assigned to each of the four load/store slices and four bus lines assigned to each of the four execution slices. Each of the execution slices may be configured to snoop results on any of the bus lines of the results bus. In some embodiments, any instruction may be dispatched to a particular execution unit and then by issued to any other slice for performance. As such, any of the execution slices may be coupled to all of the bus lines to receive results from any other slice. Further, each load/store slice may be coupled to each bus line in order to receive an issue load/store instruction from any of the execution slices. Readers of skill in the art will recognize that many different configurations of the results bus may be implemented.
The multi-slice processor in the example of
The example multi-slice processor of
During the flush and recovery operation, in prior art processors, the dispatcher was configured to halt dispatch of new instructions to an execution slice. Such instructions may be considered either target or source instructions. A target instruction is an instruction that targets a logical register for storage of result data. A source instruction by contrast has, as its source, a logical register. A target instruction, when executed, will result in data stored in an entry of a register file while a source instruction utilizes such data as a source for executing the instruction. A source instruction, while utilizing one logical register as its source, may also target another logical register for storage of the results of instruction. That is, with respect to one logical register, an instruction may be considered a source instruction and with respect to another logical register, the same instruction may be considered a target instruction.
For further explanation,
The example load/store slice (222a) of
A store reorder queue (306) may include entries for tracking the cache operations for sequential consistency and may reissue operations into the load/store pipeline for execution independent of an execution slice.
A load miss queue (308) may issue requests for data to one or more data storage devices of a multi-tiered memory hierarchy, where a request for data may correspond to a load instruction for the data.
Responsive to the data being returned along the line (302) to the load/store slice (222a), the data may be delivered to a destination such as the results bus (220 of
Responsive to a load instruction requesting data that is not stored in the data cache (232), a fetch of data to a lower tier of memory may result in a cache line being returned, where the cache line is typically larger than the data being requested in a load instruction.
If the load miss queue (308) receives multiple load instructions that may be satisfied with a single cache line, then “merging” the load operations allows the load miss queue (308) to avoid multiple cache line fetches to satisfy the multiple load instructions. A merge of load operations may be carried out by determining that a previous load instruction has caused a fetch of a cache line that would satisfy a load instruction requesting data within the same cache line, and maintaining tracking information that indicates that each of the multiple load operations may be satisfied using the same cache line.
A load reorder queue (304) may track execution of cache operations issued to the load/store slice (222a) and includes entries for tracking cache operations for sequential consistency, among other attributes. The load reorder queue (304) may also reissue operations into the load/store pipeline for execution, which provides operation that is independent of the execution slices.
Given that the load reorder queue (304) maintains, for other purposes, much of the information usable to track merged load operations, the overhead in logic and circuit space is reduced by augmenting the functionality of the load reorder queue (304) to track merges instead of augmenting the load miss queue (308) to maintain and track merges. In other words, the additional logic for tracking merges added to the load reorder queue (304) adds a small amount of overhead for each additional merge as opposed to a larger amount of overhead for tracking merges that would be incurred by the load miss queue (308)—or by any other logical component that does not already track load operations.
In this way, every entry of the load/store slice (222a) may implement merging of any number of load operations without being limited by the overhead of tracking the merge operations.
For further explanation,
The method of
Further, data cache (232) may inform both the load reorder queue (304) and the load miss queue (308) that a load instruction address generated a data cache miss—on a data cache hit, there is no merging. The load miss queue (308), in response to a data cache miss, provides the load reorder queue (304) with an indication including: an indication that the address for the load instruction is already in the load miss queue (308), which the load reorder queue (304) may interpret as a corresponding cache line already being fetched; an indication that the address for the load instruction is new, and not already in the load miss queue (308), which the load reorder queue (304) may interpret as no merging; an indication that the load miss queue (308) is unable to handle the load instruction at the present time, among other indications. The load reorder queue (304), given an indication from the load miss queue (308), may then determine, based at least in part on the indication, whether to merge the load instruction with an existing entry in the load reorder queue (304), or whether to create a new entry for the load instruction in the load reorder queue (304), and not merge the load instruction. Generally, the data being requested by the current load instruction and the previous load instruction are not necessarily the same data, rather, each of the instructions may be requesting different portions of the cache line being requested.
With regard to the load miss queue (308), a previous load operation may have caused the load miss queue (308) to determine that requested data was not stored in local data cache (232), thereby causing a fetch of the data from lower levels of memory. In this case, an entry for the previous load operation is queued in the load miss queue (308), and the load operation remains in the load miss queue (308) until the fetch of the requested data completes and the load is satisfied. Alternatively, the load miss queue (308) may determine that the requested data is stored in the data cache (232), thereby avoiding a fetch of the data from lower levels of memory to satisfy the load operation.
The method of
The method of
In other words, on a data cache miss, an entry is created for the load operation in the load miss queue (308) if the cache line being fetched does not comprise the data requested by the current load instruction—where a negative decision regarding the cache line comprising the data is reflected at (406), which leads to allocating (410) the entry for the load operation in the load miss queue (308). Allocating (410) the entry for the load operation in the load miss queue (308) may be carried out by the load miss queue (308) independently of the load reorder queue (304), where the load miss queue (308) determines that the address for the load instruction is not satisfied by any previously requested cache line for loads already in the load miss queue (308), and where the load miss queue (308) proceeds to create an entry for the load instruction in the load miss queue (308). In this case, on a data cache miss and where no pending fetches comprise data requested by the current load instruction—the load reorder queue (304) also creates an entry based on the load miss queue (308) indicating to the load reorder queue (304) that the load miss queue (308) is creating an entry for the load instruction, where this new entry in the load reorder queue (304) may be the subject of a merge for a later load instruction.
Generally, the load reorder queue (304) may track information regarding: destination registers for writing the requested data; formatting information such as address alignment and instruction op codes to deliver critical data forward data in proper alignment to a general purpose register (e.g. floating point, fixed point, integer, algebraic, among others); completion information including whether the critical data forward is valid or whether the critical data forward has been flushed by an older instruction; and collision checking to assure that the data returning from the memory is a latest copy of the memory with respect to store data this is draining or yet to be drained from the local store queues, where a collision may leave a returning cache line and the critical data forward data stale, and therefore, incorrect.
The method of
Merging (408) the load instruction in the load reorder queue (304) with a previous load instruction may be carried out by the load reorder queue (304) receiving information from the load miss queue (308) indicating which load miss queue (308) entry for a previous load instruction caused a collision with the load instruction, where the collision is due to an outstanding fetch for the previous load instruction that would retrieve a cache line that includes data requested by the load instruction. The load reorder queue (304) may use the entry information for the previous load instruction to identify the corresponding previous load instruction in the load reorder queue (304) with which to merge the current load instruction, for example, by setting information in the entry being merged to identify the current load instruction.
In other examples, merging (408) the load instruction in the load reorder queue (304) with a previous load instruction may be carried out by the load reorder queue (304) receiving information from the load miss queue (308) indicating which load miss queue (308) entry for a previous load instruction caused a collision with the load instruction, where the collision is due to an outstanding fetch for the previous load instruction that would retrieve a cache line that includes data requested by the load instruction. However, in contrast to the above example, instead of using an entry for the previous load instruction in the load reorder queue (304) to track a merge with the load instruction, the load reorder queue (304) creates an entry for the current load instruction and stores within the entry for the current load instruction a pointer to an entry in the load miss queue (308) corresponding to the load instruction that caused the pending fetch of the cache line. In this example, the entry for the previous load instruction in the load reorder queue (304) also stores a pointer to the same entry in the load miss queue (308) corresponding to the load instruction that caused the pending fetch of the cache line—which may be the same instruction in the load reorder queue (304). Further, the respective entries in both the load reorder queue (304) and the load miss queue (308) may be identifiable according to ITAGs. In this example, each entry in the load reorder queue (304) that includes a pointer to a same entry in the load miss queue (308) may be considered to be merged.
The load miss queue (308), after communicating information to the load reorder queue (304) for merging the load operation with the previous load operation, may reject the load instruction and not queue the load instruction in the load miss queue because the load reorder queue (304) is now responsible for tracking the merge of the load instruction with the previous load instruction.
In other words, merging (408), in the load reorder queue (304), the load instruction with an entry for the previous load instruction may be carried out by the load reorder queue (304) using the information received from the load miss queue (308) corresponding to the load instruction to identify the previous load instruction within the load reorder queue (304) and setting tracking information within the entry for the previous load instruction indicating a merge with an entry created for the load instruction rejected by the load miss queue, and setting tracking information within the entry for the load instruction indicating a merge with an entry created for the previous load instruction.
Further, the load reorder queue (304) may track the progress of the requested cache line and may track relative ages of the load instructions that have been merged so that in response to the cache line being detected, the load reorder queue may schedule the oldest of the merged load instructions for receiving critical data forwarding data, and younger load instructions to receive data from the data cache (232).
For example, the load reorder queue (304) may schedule the previous load instruction to receive data from line (310) at a first cycle, which bypasses data cache (232), and on a subsequent cycle, schedule the load instruction to receive data retrieved from the data cache (232)—since by the time that the critical data forwarding data is received, the cache line is stored in the data cache (232).
In this way, the load reorder queue (304) may implement an expanded merge fetching queue that is not limited by overhead in the load miss queue (308), but rather the merge fetching may encompass any number of the existing entries of the load reorder queue (304). In other words, if a merge is to be performed, the merge is managed by the load reorder queue (304) and not the load miss queue (308), thereby avoiding the use of load miss queue (308) resources.
For further explanation,
The method of
The method of
The method of
Propagating (504) data (552) for the previous load to the results bus without accessing the data cache (232) may be carried out by the load reorder queue (304) using the determination that the cache line is coming up into the data cache (232) to route the data requested by the previous load instruction from the cache line to the results bus—and also notifying another logical component, such as the instruction sequencing unit, that the data is available to be written to a destination such as a general purpose register.
In bypassing the data cache (232), one or more cycles may be saved in fulfilling the load instruction since there is no delay for the cycle or cycles used to write the data cache and read from the data cache to fulfill the load instruction. The data bypassing the data cache may be considered critical data forwarding data.
Storing (506) the cache line in the data cache may be carried out by the data cache (232) receiving and storing the cache line as it comes up from a lower level of memory in the memory hierarchy. In this way, as the critical data forwarding data is being provided, the data cache may hold the data for a next load instruction to be satisfied at a later processing cycle.
The method of
Propagating (508) the data for the load instruction to the results bus in a cycle after the critical data forwarding data was propagated may be carried out by the load reorder queue (304) scheduling the data for the load instruction to be transmitted to the results bus after the previous load instruction, where propagating the data (554) for the load instruction to the results bus may be carried out by retrieving the data from the data cache (232) and transmitting the data (554) to the results bus.
In this way, the multiple load instructions that have been merged may be scheduled to be fulfilled in as few cycles as practicable, where older load instructions are fulfilled along the critical data forwarding path, and later load instruction are fulfilled from the data cache.
For further explanation,
The method of
The method of
Determining (602) that the previous load instruction is the oldest load instruction among multiple merge entries may be carried out by the load reorder queue (304) accessing entry information for each load operation corresponding to a single merge for a given cache line, where the entry information includes information for ordering the multiple merge entries.
In this way, the load reorder queue (304) may select the oldest of the load instructions corresponding to a merge to benefit from the critical data forwarding path, and where later load instruction may retrieve data from the data cache (232) in later cycles.
The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.
The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.
Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.
These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
It will be understood from the foregoing description that modifications and changes may be made in various embodiments of the present invention without departing from its true spirit. The descriptions in this specification are for purposes of illustration only and are not to be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of the present invention is limited only by the language of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4858113 | Saccardi | Aug 1989 | A |
5055999 | Frank et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5095424 | Woffinden et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5353426 | Patel et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5471593 | Branigin | Nov 1995 | A |
5475856 | Kogge | Dec 1995 | A |
5553305 | Gregor et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5630149 | Bluhm | May 1997 | A |
5680597 | Kumar et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5809522 | Novak et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809530 | Samra | Sep 1998 | A |
5822602 | Thusoo | Oct 1998 | A |
5913048 | Cheong et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5996068 | Dwyer, III et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6021485 | Feiste et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026478 | Dowling | Feb 2000 | A |
6044448 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6073215 | Snyder | Jun 2000 | A |
6073231 | Bluhm et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092175 | Levy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098166 | Leibholz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112019 | Chamdani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119203 | Snyder et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138230 | Hervin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145054 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6170051 | Dowling | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6269427 | Kuttanna et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212544 | Borkenhagen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237081 | Le et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6286027 | Dwyer, III et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311261 | Chamdani et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336168 | Frederick, Jr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336183 | Le et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356918 | Chuang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381676 | Aglietti et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6418513 | Arimilli et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425073 | Roussel et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6463524 | Delaney et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487578 | Ranganathan | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6549930 | Chrysos et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564315 | Keller et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6654876 | Le et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6728866 | Kahle et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732236 | Favor | May 2004 | B2 |
6839828 | Gschwind et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847578 | Ayukawa et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868491 | Moore | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6883107 | Rodgers et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6944744 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948051 | Rivers et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954846 | Leibholz et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978459 | Dennis et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7020763 | Saulsbury et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024543 | Grisenthwaite et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7086053 | Long et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093105 | Webb, Jr. et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100028 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114163 | Hardin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124160 | Saulsbury et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155600 | Burky et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7191320 | Hooker et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7263624 | Marchand et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7290261 | Burky et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302527 | Barrick et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7386704 | Schulz et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395419 | Gonion | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7398374 | Delano | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7401188 | Matthews | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7469318 | Chung et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7478198 | Latorre et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478225 | Brooks et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7490220 | Balasubramonian et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7509484 | Golla et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7512724 | Dennis et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7565652 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7600096 | Parthasarathy et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7669035 | Young et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7669036 | Brown et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685410 | Shen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694112 | Barowski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707390 | Ozer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7721069 | Ramchandran et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7793278 | Du et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7836317 | Marchand et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7889204 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890735 | Tran | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7926023 | Okawa et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7949859 | Kalla et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7975134 | Gonion | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987344 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8046566 | Abernathy et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8074224 | Nordquist et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8099556 | Ghosh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103852 | Bishop et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108656 | Katragadda et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8131942 | Harris et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131980 | Hall et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8135942 | Abernathy et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140832 | Mejdrich et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8141088 | Morishita et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8166282 | Madriles et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8184686 | Wall et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8219783 | Hara | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8219787 | Lien et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8243866 | Huang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250341 | Schulz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8271765 | Bose et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8325793 | Zhong | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8335892 | Minkin et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8386751 | Ramchandran et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8402256 | Arakawa | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412914 | Gonion | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8464025 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489791 | Byrne et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8521992 | Alexander et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8555039 | Rychlik | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8654884 | Kerr | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8656401 | Venkataramanan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8683182 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8713263 | Bryant | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8850121 | Ashcraft et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8929496 | Lee et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8935513 | Guthrie et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8966232 | Tran | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8984264 | Karlsson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9069563 | Konigsburg et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9207995 | Boersma et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9223709 | O'Bleness et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9519484 | Stark | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9665372 | Eisen et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9672043 | Eisen et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9690585 | Eisen et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9690586 | Eisen et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9720696 | Chu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9740486 | Boersma et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9760375 | Boersma et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20020078302 | Favor | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020194251 | Richter et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030120882 | Granston et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030163669 | Delano | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182537 | Le et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040111594 | Feiste et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040162966 | Webb, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172521 | Hooker et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181652 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040216101 | Burky et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050060518 | Augsburg et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050138290 | Hammarlund et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060095710 | Pires Dos Reis Moreira et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106923 | Balasubramonian et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070022277 | Iwamura et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070079303 | Du et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101102 | Dierks, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070180221 | Abernathy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204137 | Tran | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080098260 | Okawa et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104375 | Hansen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133885 | Glew | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162895 | Luick | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080270749 | Ozer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080307182 | Arimilli et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313424 | Gschwind | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037698 | Nguyen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090113182 | Abernathy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090198921 | Chen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090265532 | Caprioli et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300319 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100100685 | Kurosawa et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100161945 | Burky et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191940 | Mejdrich et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120066482 | Gonion | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120110271 | Boersma et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120246450 | Abdallah | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130305022 | Eisen | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140025933 | Venkataramanan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140075159 | Frigo et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140215189 | Airaud et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140223144 | Heil et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244239 | Nicholson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140281408 | Zeng | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150046662 | Heinrich | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150121010 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150121046 | Kunjan | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150134935 | Blasco | May 2015 | A1 |
20150199272 | Goel et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150324204 | Eisen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150324205 | Eisen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150324206 | Eisen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150324207 | Eisen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160070571 | Boersma et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160070574 | Boersma et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092231 | Chu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092276 | Chu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160103715 | Sethia et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160202986 | Ayub et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202988 | Ayub et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202989 | Eisen et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202990 | Brownscheidle et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202991 | Eisen et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202992 | Brownscheidle et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170168837 | Eisen et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170255465 | Chadha et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170277543 | McGlone et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170300328 | Cordes et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170329641 | Chadha et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170329713 | Chadha et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170351521 | Hrusecky | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170357507 | Cordes et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170357508 | Cordes et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170371658 | Eickemeyer et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101021778 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101676865 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101876892 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102004719 | Apr 2011 | CN |
1212680 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2356324 | May 2001 | GB |
2356324 | Oct 2001 | GB |
2009157887 | Jul 2009 | JP |
WO 2015067118 | May 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 15/152,257, to Sundeep Chadha et al., entitled, Operation of a Multi-Slice Processor Implementing a Load/Store Unit Maintaining Rejected Instructions, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 37 pages, filed May 11, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/180,838, to Robert A. Cordes et al., entitled, Operation of a Multi-Slice Processor Implementing Simultaneous Two-Target Loads and Stores, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 37 pages, filed Jun. 13, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/193,338, to Richard J. Eickemeyer et al., entitled, Managing a Divided Load Reorder Queue, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 35 pages, filed Jun. 27, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/230,532, to Sundeep Chadha et al., entitled, Flush Avoidance in a Load Store Unit, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 37 pages, filed Aug. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,638, to Robert A. Cordes et al., entitled, Operation of a Multi-Slice Processor Implementing Simultaneous Two-Target Loads and Stores, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 37 pages, filed Jul. 26, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,035, to Sundeep Chadha et al, entitled, Operation of a Multi-Slice Processor implementing a Load/Store Unit Maintaining Rejected Instructions, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 37 pages, filed Jul. 27, 2016. |
Gebhart et al., A Hierarchical Thread Scheduler and Register File for Energy-efficient Throughput Processors, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, Apr. 2012, pp. 8:1-8:38, vol. 30, No. 2, Article 8, ACM New York. |
Anonymous, Method and system for Implementing “Register Threads” in a Simultaneously-Multithreaded (SMT) Processor Core, An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, IP.com No. IPCOM000199825D IP.com Electronic Publication: Sep. 17, 2010 pp. 1-4 <http://ip.com/IPCOM/000199825>. |
Czajkowski et al., Resource Management for Extensible Internet Servers, Proceedings of the 8 ACM SIGOPS European Workshop on Support for Composing Distributed Applications Sep. 1998 pp. 33-39 ACM Portugal. |
Bridges et al., A CPU Utilization Limit for Massively Parallel MIMD Computers, Fourth Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computing Oct. 19-21, 1992 pp. 83-92 IEEE VA US. |
Pechanek et al., ManArray Processor Interconnection Network: An Introduction, Euro-Par' 99 Parallel Processing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5th International Euro-Par Conference, Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1999, Proceedings, pp. 761-65, vol. 1685, Spring Berlin Heidelberg, Toulouse, France. |
Pechanek et al., The ManArray Embedded Processor Architecture, Proceedings of the 26 Euromicro Conference, IEEE Computer Society, Sep. 5-7, 2000, pp. 348-355, vol. 1, Maastricht. |
Anonymous, Precise Merging Translation Queue in a Slice-Based Processor, An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, IP.com No. IPCOM000249317D IP.com Electronic Publication: Feb. 16, 2017, pp. 1-3. <https://priorart.ip.com/IPCOM/000249317 >. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/IB2015/052741, dated Oct. 9, 2015. |
Anonymous, “A Novel Data Prefetch Method Under Heterogeneous Architecture”, IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure No. 000224167 (online), Dec. 2012, 14 pages, URL: http://ip.com/IPCOM/000224167. |
Anonymous, “Method and System for Predicting Performance Trade-Offs During Critical Path Execution in a Processor”, IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure No. 000223340 (online), Nov. 2012, 7 pages, URL: http://ip.com/IPCOM/000223340. |
IBM, “Using a mask to block the wakeup of dependents of already-issued instructions”, An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure (online), IP.com No. 000193322, URL: http://ip.com/IPCOM/000193322, dated Feb. 18, 2010, 2 pages. |
Anonymous, “Fast wakeup of load dependent instructions by a select bypass”, An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure (online), IP.com No. 000216900, URL: http://ip.com/IPCOM/000216900, dated Apr. 23, 2012, 2 pages. |
Kalla, et al., “IBM Power5 Chip: A Dual-Core Multithreaded Processor”, IEEE Micro, vol. 24, No. 2, Mar. 2004, pp. 40-47, IEEE Xplore Digital Library (online), DOI: 10.1109/MM.2004.1289290. |
Mathis et al., “Characterization of simultaneous multithreading (SMT) efficiency in POWER5”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, Jul. 2005, pp. 555-564, vol. 49, No. 4/5, International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY. |
Sha et al., “Scalable Store-Load Forwarding via Store Queue Index Prediction”, Proceedings of the 38th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO'05), dated Nov. 2005, 12 pages, http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_papers/262 (online), ISBN: 0-7695-2440-0; DOI: 10.1109/MICRO.2005.29, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC. |
ROC920150400U51 , Appendix P; List of IBM Patent or Applications Treated as Related, Sep. 22, 2016, 2 pages. |
Roth, Store Vulnerability Window (SVW): Re-Execution Filtering for Enhanced Load/Store Optimization, Technical Reports (CIS), Paper 35, Jan. 2004, 23 pages, University of Pennsylvania Scholarly Commons (online), <https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1023&context=cis_reports>. |
Bobba et al., Safe and Efficient Supervised Memory Systems, 17th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Feb. 2011, 12 pages, IEEE xPlore Digital Library (online; IEEE.org), DOI: 10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749744. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170277542 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |