The invention relates to an optical interference device.
An example of an optical interference device is a grating spectrometer which is commonly used to measure the spectral properties of light over a specific portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. When used in spectroscopy, the measurement may then be analysed to determine characteristics of materials exposed to the light.
However, existing spectrometers are either relatively large in size or if they are small, they suffer from low light throughput as well as low spectral resolution.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an optical interference device which addresses at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art and/or to provide the public with a useful choice.
In a first aspect, there is provided an optical interference device comprising: a phase shifter array for receiving a collimated beam of light, the phase shifter array having an array of cells for producing optical light channels from respective rays of the collimated beam of light, at least some of the optical light channels having varying phase shifts; a focusing element having a focal distance and arranged to simultaneously produce, from the optical light channels, a focused beam of light in its focal plane and an image downstream the phase shifter array for detection by an optical detector; and an optical spatial filter arranged at the focal distance of the focusing element and arranged to filter the focused beam of light to produce a spatially distributed interference light pattern in zeroth order for detection by the optical detector.
An advantage of the described embodiment is that this enables the components of the optical interference device to be arranged on a same optical plane and thus, a very compact optical interference device may be achieved.
It is envisaged that the focusing element may include a lenslet array, with each lenslet arranged to receive some of the optical light channels or a respective optical light channel. In such an embodiment, the spatial filter may include an aperture array, with each aperture arranged at the focal distance of the respective lenslet of the lenslet array.
Preferably, at least some of the cells of the array of cells may be blank cells which do not affect the phase of the rays incident on the respective blank cells. This is particularly useful to measure source uniformity and the information may be used to compensate for non-uniform illumination.
The phase shifter array may have various configurations and dimensions. For example, in one embodiment, at least some of the cells of the array of cells may include a lamellar structure. In one example, the lamellar structure may include alternately raised and recessed surfaces. The lamellar structure may have an even number or an odd number of the raised and recessed surfaces. In another example, the alternately raised and recessed surfaces may form a concentric pattern.
Specifically, the focusing element may be a focusing lens or mirror. An optical collimator may form part of the optical interference device and if that's the case, then the optical interference device further comprises an optical collimator arranged to produce the collimated beam of light. The optical interference may also further comprise an entrance aperture for directing an incident light towards the optical collimator.
Preferably, an interferogram may be derived from the spatially distributed interference light pattern, and a spectrum may be derived from the interferogram by using a system of linear equations. The linear equations may include using matrix inversion.
The optical interference device may be used in various applications and thus, the optical interference device may be adapted as a Fourier spectrometer, or a Raman spectrometer.
The optical interference device may also be adapted to detect two (or more) spectroscopic channels at the same time. Thus, the optical interference device may further comprise a further phase shifter array arranged adjacent to the phase shifter array, wherein the further phase shifter array is arranged to receive a reference beam of light.
Due to its very compact size, the optical interference device may be adapted to be used with handheld or portable devices for transmission or absorbance measurements. Thus, in a second aspect, there is provided a combined product in which there is the optical interference device as described above with the optical interference device including an optical housing for housing the optical collimator, the phase shifter array, the focusing lens and the spatial filter, and a portable computing device having the optical detector in the form of a camera or focal plane array, the optical housing being adapted to be fitted to the camera or focal plane array wherein the camera may be configured to detect the spatially distributed interference light pattern.
In a third aspect, there is provided a phase shifter array for receiving a collimated beam of light, the phase shifter array having an array of cells for producing optical light channels from respective rays of the collimated beam of light, at least some of the optical light channels having varying phase shifts; wherein the array of cells includes at least some blank cells which do not affect the phase of the rays incident on the respective blank cells; and a lamellar structure having cells of varying depths for producing the optical light channels having varying phase shifts.
An advantage of the described embodiment is that this enables the source uniformity to be measured simultaneously and this information may then be used to compensate for non-uniform illumination. In this way, spectral information may be computed.
Preferably, the blank cells may be generally flat. In an embodiment, the lamellar structure may include alternately raised and recessed surfaces. The lamellar structure may include an even number or an odd number of the raised and recessed surfaces. In a described embodiment, the alternately raised and recessed surfaces may form a concentric pattern.
In a fourth aspect, there is provided a method for producing a spatially distributed interference light pattern, comprising: receiving a collimated beam of light, producing optical light channels from respective rays of the received collimated beam of light, at least some of the optical light channels having varying phase shifts; providing a focusing element having a focal distance; simultaneously producing, by the focusing element, from the optical light channels, a focused beam of light in its focal plane and an image downstream for detection by an optical detector; and providing an optical spatial filter at the focal distance of the focusing element and filtering the focused beam of light by the optical spatial filter to produce the spatially distributed interference light pattern in zeroth order for detection by the optical detector.
It should be appreciated that features relevant to one aspect may also be relevant to the other aspects.
Exemplary embodiments will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The entrance optical spatial filter 102 is arranged to receive light from a light source (not shown) and the entrance optical spatial filter 102 is arranged to limit and direct the light from the light source to the collimating lens 106. The collimating lens 106 collimates the light into a collimated beam of light for the phase shifter array 108 which produces optical light channels from respective rays of the collimated beam of light. It should be appreciated that at least some of the optical light channels have varying phase shifts.
The focusing lens 110 receives the optical light channels from the phase shifter array 108 and is arranged to produce a focused beam of light in its focal plane. The exit optical spatial filter 112 (and thus, the exit aperture 114) is arranged at a focal distance of the focusing lens 110, and is arranged to receive the focused beam of light from the focusing lens 110 and to produce a spatially distributed interference light pattern in zeroth order for detection by an optical detector 116.
It should be noted that in addition to the focused beam of light, the focusing lens 110 is also arranged to produce an image of the phase shifter array 108 simultaneously and projecting the image for detection by the optical detector 116.
The optical detector 116 records a pixelated interference pattern and may send this pixel information to a processing module for computing spectral composition of the light.
With the blank cells 118, it is possible to measure the source uniformity and use this information to compensate for non-uniform illumination. The combination of cells 128 which cause phase shifts of the incident light ray and the blank cells 118 of the phase shifter array 108 allows monitoring of the source distribution illuminating the phase shifter array at the same time.
Again, the spatial intensity distribution is useful to compensate for non-uniform illumination. Arranging hundreds of the individual cells 128 in one or two perpendicular directions including the blank cells 118 make up the phase shifter array 108 of
It should be appreciated that the cells 128 may come in different shapes, sizes and structures depending on the measurements to be obtained.
It is envisaged that a lamellar structure of a cell may have different structures and dimensions and an example is shown in
The use of the blank cells 118 disposed among the cells 128 allows monitoring of source distribution illuminating the phase shifter array at the same time. This would enable non-uniform illumination to be compensated.
Next, it would be appropriate to discuss how the phase shifter array 108 refracts the light rays as the rays transmit through the phase shifter array 108. For simplicity,
To appreciate dispersion of the refractive index over the spectral range, it is assumed that the plane waves u1j,u2j travel in the X-axis direction through the two facets 136,138 of the cell 130 and with the two facets 136,138 having respective thicknesses L, dj (i.e. cell lengths).
At thickness L of
û1j(k0,L,t)=eik
û2j(k0,L,t)=eik
where,
Using the definition:
n(k0)=n′n(k0)+iK(k0) (Eq: 1-3)
where,
With these, the interference between the two light beams uij,u2j is computed by:
û1j+û2j=e−k
From equation Eq:1-4, absolute square of the sum of the amplitudes of the two light beams u1j,u2j that is proportional to power are calculated from:
|û1j+û2j|2=(û1j+û2j)(û1j+û2j)* (Eq: 1-5)
It follows for a simplified case of non-absorbing material, K=0:
|û1j+û2j|j2=2(1+cos(k0(n′(k0)−1)(L−dj))) (Eq: 1-6)
As a consequence, spectral power for
where,
j=1,2, . . .
And g2(k0l) is the spectral power distribution of the light source.
From equation Eq. 1-7, a system of linear equations may be computed that can be solved using matrix inversion to obtain the interference pattern generated by the cell 130. In the case of evaluation of the interferogram by means of Fourier transformation, additional corrections of the frequency spectrum may be required to compensate for a wave number dependent peak position shift.
Although the above explanation is based on the cell 130, it should be apparent that the explanation similarly applies to the entire phase shifter array 108.
It should be apparent that the focusing element may take other forms, not just the focusing lens 110 illustrated in
The first alternative spectrometer arrangement 200 includes an alternative phase shifter array 202 similar to that shown in
The first alternative spectrometer arrangement 200 further includes an optical spatial filter in the form of an aperture array 210 arranged at a focal distance of the lenslet array 204. The aperture array 210 comprising a plurality of slit apertures 212 with each slit aperture 212 arranged at a focal distance of a corresponding lenslet 206. Further, downstream of the lenslet array 204 and the aperture array 210, the first alternative spectrometer arrangement 200 also includes a secondary lenslet array 214 comprising a plurality of secondary lenslets 216, and an optical detector in the form of a detector array 218.
As shown in
With the use of the lenslet array 204, it is possible to achieve a very compact spectrometer. It should be appreciated that the lenslet array 204 (and the secondary lenslet array 214) may be formed by two or more individual lens array combined together such as two crossed cylindrical lenslet arrays instead of a singular lenslet array shown in
The second alternative spectrometer arrangement 300 includes an alternative phase shifter array 302 similar to that shown in
In view of the concentric structure of the phase shifter array 302, unlike the arrangement of
The described embodiment and alternative arrangements have many advantages and solve numerous problems. For example:
Broader Free Spectral Working Range:
Dispersive elements like gratings or prisms tend to limit the spectral bandwidth of a device, referred to as free spectral range. For instance, the dispersion formula of a grating at normal incidence is described by the formula:
d(sin θm+sin α)=mλ (Eq.:2-1)
where
Thus, for α=0, a given diffraction grating of fixed grating spacing d, and a diffraction order such as the first (m=1), diffracted beam θm forms a maximum for an angle θm=1=sin−1 (λ/d). The same applies for the case of m=2 and a wavelength of λ/2, implying that the free spectral range for diffraction gratings is limited to one octave working band (λmax/λmin<2). As a result, conventional grating spectrometers require filtering of wavelengths beyond the working band of the grating.
In contrast, the optical interference device described in the embodiment does not require the filtering of wavelengths and can be tailored to work throughout the spectral bandwidth set by the optical detector and this may be typically an order of magnitude.
Lower Manufacturing Tolerances:
Gratings may be produced by mechanical ruling or by holography. In case of mechanical ruling, the manufacturing requirements of a grating are tremendous. It is known that each groove facet of a grating should be flat with smooth straight edges and free from irregularities on a scale of less than λmin/10. The groove spacing should be maintained within about 1% of the wavelength. For a grating of a size of 10 by 10 mm2 for example, and λmin of 300 nm such a requirement necessitates a manufacturing tolerance of 30 nm over the entire length of a groove of 10 mm. This equals an angular tolerance along a facet of 3 μrad and a surface roughness well below the 30 nm. The requirement of the high degree of planarity makes low cost replication techniques difficult since the grating must not distort in the process.
In case of holographic production, requirements are more naturally fulfilled as the grating pattern are generated via interference of two coherent laser beams, however, holographic gratings cannot be easily blazed and have a considerably lower efficiency than ruled gratings.
In the described embodiment, it is proposed that individual cells 130, 132, 134 are used to form the phase shifter array 108 and thus, the entire surface can be considered as being divided into small surface elements and requires much lower tolerance levels in terms of surface planarity. Comparing both types for a wavelength of 300 nm, the tolerance on surface planarity for the described embodiment may only be in the range of 30 mrad, which may be four orders of magnitude less stringent while maintaining a similar requirement on surface roughness.
On-Optical-Axis System:
Gratings are generally used off-axis in either transmission (refraction) or reflection modes. In comparison, the described embodiment offers a transmission setup (as described above) offering an advantage of having all optical components on a common optical axis. This results in low optical aberrations and thus a compact device with minimum number of optical elements could be achieved. It is envisaged that the described embodiment may similarly extend to reflection setups.
With a very compact optical interference device, it is possible to adapt the device for use with portable electronic devices such as smart phones. Indeed, in doing so, by ubiquitous presence and ready availability of smart phone-integrated spectrometers, the invention drastically lowers the threshold for using spectroscopy in daily life, commercial, industrial, scientific, medical, cosmetics, biological field while providing all the advantages of spectroscopy over other conventional spectroscopic approaches.
Compact Device Size:
The spectrometer 100 described in the embodiment may not require a high degree of collimation thus allowing for compact short focal length collimators and size.
In a conventional grating spectrometer having a collimator, the focal length of the collimator and an entrance aperture size may have a significant influence on the spectral resolution.
The collimation angle φ is given by:
φ=tan−1(Ø/2f) (Eq.:2-2)
where
To separate two wavelengths in a spectrum, the grating must disperse the incoming beam to angles larger than the collimation angle e.g. (Δθ=θm,λ2−θm,λ1>φ). See Eq.:2-1 for definitions of λ, θm etc.
Thus, the spectral resolution (the difference between two neighbouring resolved spectral lines Δλ=λ2−λ1) is inevitably limited by the collimation angle φ. It may be estimated by differentiating Eq.: 2-1:
Δλ/Δθ=d cos(θm)/m (Eq.:2-3)
Assuming Δθ≥φ results in:
Δλ>=φd cos(θm)/m=tan−1(Ø/2f)d cos(θm)/m≅(Ø/2f)d cos(θm)/m for small collimation angles
or
φ≤Δλm/(d cos(θm)) (Eq.:2-4)
As a result of Eq. 2-4, grating spectrometers must keep φ at minimum to obtain higher resolution (smaller values of Δλ) and thus require either small entrance apertures (small Ø) or optically long collimator arrangements (large focal length f) with low acceptance angles.
In the described embodiment of
It follows:
φ=min[condition 1, condition 2] with:
Condition 1
φ=cos−1(1−λ/2δmax)
with Δλ=λ2/(2δmax) it follows:
φ=cos−1(1−λ/λ)
Δλ=(1−cos(φ))λ (Eq.:2-5)
Condition 2:
φ=cos−1(√((P/λmin)2/(1+P/λmin)2))) (Eq.:2-6)
where
Accordingly, P may be chosen in the range of P=3 to 10 λmax to avoid or minimise polarization effects of the phase shifter array 100. It should be mentioned that purposely-designed phase shifter arrays with periods below 3 λmax offer polarization sensitive measurements and polarization dependent detection and are part of the scope of the described embodiment.
To compare the exemplary spectrometer and the spectrometer 100 of the described embodiment,
High Light Throughput:
It is well known that throughput (T) or geometrical extent of an optical system is given by product of the cross-sectional area (A) of a beam and its projected solid angle (Ω):
T=AΩ (Eq.: 2-7)
The projected solid angle is given by:
Ω=π sin2(Θ) (Eq.: 2-8)
whereby Θ describes a half angle of the largest cone of meridional rays that can pass through the optical system.
The throughput is the decisive figure of merit describing an ability of a device to collect and transmit radiation through the optical system. In a subsequent derivation, an estimation is given for the advantage over conventional grating spectrometer devices. As stated earlier the throughput is important for scarce light applications such as Raman spectroscopy, when the detectors are less sensitive, or when integration times to capture a signal are short.
For the spectrometer 100, the throughput follows the same conditions as described for the collimation angle. Thus, Θ is limited either by collimation angle required for a given resolution (condition 1, in the previous section) or by the angle of the 1st diffraction of the shortest wavelength (λmin) emanating from the spectrometer 100 (denoted as MCFTS) (condition 2) whichever is smaller. It follows:
TMCFTS=min[TMCFTS,1TMCFTS,2]
Condition 1: Combining equations 2-5, 2-7, and 2-8 and setting the requirement for Θ≤φ, the throughput is given by:
Condition 2
sin(θ)=λmin/P (Eq.:2-10)
whereby
Combining equations 2-7, 2-8 and 2-10, and setting the requirement for Θ≤θ, the throughput is given by:
Where:
A=total area of the phase shifter array 108 (MPSA) structure in case the total system throughput is considered or it is given by the area of a single cell element in case each measurement channel is considered individually.
To derive Eq. 2-9 and Eq. 2-11, the two equations sin2(cos−1(x))=1−x2 and sin2(sin−1(x))=x2 are simplified for small values of x, respectively.
Comparing the throughput, T, with a conventional spectrometer such as a grating device, TGrating can be estimated by combining equations 2-1,2-4,2-7, and 2-8. Using the simplification of cos(sin−1(x))=√(1−x2) it follows that the throughput for perpendicularly incident radiation onto such a grating device is given by:
where:
Using the same assumptions as in the discussion on collimation requirements, the throughputs TMCFTS/TGrating of both devices are compared by plotting the throughput ratio of TMCFTS/TGrating as a function of spectral resolution at λmin=350 nm wavelength (λmax is set to 700 nm) for the given case that both illuminated areas A are the same for both devices in respect of P=100 λmax, P=10 λmax, and P=3 λmax. The result is shown in
Spatial Filtering:
Unlike known techniques, a spatial filtering technique is combined with the phase shifter array 108. As proposed in
Spectroscopy may have very wide fields of application and a determining factor is the spectral range. For example, in the field of visible spectroscopy and the use of a smart phone camera as a read-out and computation tool, such applications may extend beyond industrial applications to encompass individual smart phone users. The smart phone market is ever expanding and thus, smart phone spectrometers may offer huge potentials such as detection of blood sugar levels or blood oxygen levels to the measurement of UVA (ultraviolet A) which may be used to predict or determine cancer risks and UV protection for sunbathing. Additionally, combining spectroscopy with smart phone platforms, this offers a low-cost point-of-care sensing solutions, which allows information to be sent via the web, which may include feedback, location identification and data logging utilizing cloud services.
In general, visible spectroscopy provides information about:
electron transitions in atoms−atomic information>in addition to infrared providing molecular information
in fluorescence spectroscopy, transitions from excited states to ground state
in Raman spectroscopy, molecular information may be obtained>high impact.
Colorimetry: Precise determination of color, including color changes of labeling agents indicating change in concentration or acidity e.g. the change of methyl orange color as pH indicators. Lateral flow tests whereby a color change can be read out by the spectrometer 100 to report a certain event such as a pregnancy.
Medical:
The described embodiments should not be construed as limitative. For example, arranging the individual cells 128 of varying profile depth together results in a global phase shifter array 108 as shown in
The optical detector 116 may be any device sensitive to electromagnetic radiation such as CCD or CMOS photon detectors for the light (such as UV) to be detected. MCT (Mercury cadmium telluride or HgCdTe) and/or thermal detectors for infrared radiation may also be used. The detector material and the spectral characteristics of the optical components comprising the spectrometer 100 determine the spectral working band. In the case of a visible spectrometer, the spectrometer presented may utilize the camera system of a smart phone or other electronic devices such as tablets to read the interference pattern. Additionally, the processor of the smart phone may be utilized to compute the necessary Fourier-transformation or matrix inversion to obtain the spectral information. Such an arrangement is shown in
The size of the spectrometer 100 and the various components (eg. the entrance optical filter 102, the collimating lens 106, phase shifter array 108 etc) may be designed and optimized, and it is also possible that the spectrometer 100 may be integrated as part of the smart phone's optical system. It is also possible that in the smart phone 400, additional optics such as a third lens to collimate the beam coming from the exit aperture 114 of the exit optical spatial filter 112 may be utilized to further reduce the system size. In case of an additional collimating lens, the image of the phase shifter array 108 is then formed at “infinity” while the smart phone's camera optics must be locked at “infinity” focus to form the image of the phase shifter array 108 at the detector plane. Further, if the spectrometer 100 is arranged parallel to the longitudinal axis 142 of the smart phone, mirrors may be arranged along the optical path of the longitudinal axis 142 of the smart phone 400 to permit highly compact spectrometer setups. To avoid chromatic aberrations introduced by the lens system, achromatic lenses may be used.
If a smart phone (or portable electronic device such as tablet) is used to process interference pattern, the camera of the smart phone may function as the optical detector 116 and in this way, the camera may record a pixelated interference pattern generated by the spectrometer 100 and the processor of the smart phone may plots this information as an interferogram from which the spectral composition is computed via Fourier transformation or matrix inversion to present the result.
It is also possible to construct or arrange two (or more) identical phase shifter arrays 108 next to each other and this allows detecting two (or more) spectroscopic channels at the same time. This may be of particular importance for transmission or absorbance measurements. For example, one phase shifter array may be used for a sample beam of light and the other phase shifter may be used for a reference beam of light. This may be performed using the similar focusing lens and exit aperture as in
Some of the components of the spectrometer 100 illustrated in
The phase shifter array 108 may be fabricated in different shapes and dimensions. For example, the phase shifter array 108 may have a triangular cross-section or diagonally extending stairstep surface.
In another variation,
In a further variation,
It should be appreciated from these variations that other structures and configurations of the phase shifter array 108 may be used.
Having now fully described the invention, it should be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many modifications can be made hereto without departing from the scope as claimed.
This application is a national stage application of International Patent Application PCT/SG2015/000075, filed Mar. 12, 2015, claiming priority U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/952,583, filed Mar. 13, 2014, entitled “AN OPTICAL INTERFERENCE DEVICE” which applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SG2015/000075 | 3/12/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/137880 | 9/17/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4057326 | Knop | Nov 1977 | A |
4348105 | Caprari | Sep 1982 | A |
4974919 | Muraki | Dec 1990 | A |
4999234 | Cowan | Mar 1991 | A |
5111325 | DeJager | May 1992 | A |
5243619 | Albers | Sep 1993 | A |
5619245 | Kessler | Apr 1997 | A |
5654798 | Bruning | Aug 1997 | A |
5757544 | Tabata | May 1998 | A |
5802092 | Endriz | Sep 1998 | A |
5808657 | Kurtz | Sep 1998 | A |
5828492 | Moser | Oct 1998 | A |
5854671 | Nishi | Dec 1998 | A |
6016199 | Newton | Jan 2000 | A |
6084710 | Katsuma | Jul 2000 | A |
6091496 | Hill | Jul 2000 | A |
6121625 | Ito | Sep 2000 | A |
6268921 | Seitz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278548 | Shimano | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6295119 | Suzuki | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6383719 | Bula et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6441383 | Ito et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449237 | Yoo | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6747799 | Fabiny | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6773142 | Rekow | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804269 | Lizotte | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7009771 | Bourdelais | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7050171 | Banerjee | May 2006 | B1 |
7057632 | Yamawaki | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7106418 | Jen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7248770 | Parker | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7330266 | Guerineau | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359058 | Kranz | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7639722 | Paxton | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7643152 | de Boer | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7649615 | Case et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7751063 | Dillon | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7841719 | Podoleanu | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7982881 | Fercher | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990543 | Mello | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8009358 | Zalevsky | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8305577 | Kivioja et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8320621 | McEldowney | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8345226 | Zhang | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8345234 | Myrick | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8446593 | Ellerbee | May 2013 | B1 |
8665440 | Kompaniets | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8993974 | Goodwin | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9066087 | Shpunt | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9116039 | Shkunov | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9207122 | Auner | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9273846 | Rossi | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9366861 | Johnson | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9736459 | Mor | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9791684 | Villiger | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20030096176 | Akira et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040027582 | Dulman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040258353 | Gluckstad | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007601 | Rosakis | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050046864 | Millerd | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062949 | Irie | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100827 | Liao et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050213472 | Ikenaka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060279732 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018286 | Chen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070153293 | Gruhlke | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165013 | Goulanian | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070260349 | Hendrik et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080024763 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080038467 | Jagannathan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080285049 | Rembe | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090021598 | McLean | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090114818 | Casares | May 2009 | A1 |
20090161090 | Campbell | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100253941 | Brady | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110180695 | Li | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188054 | Petronius | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218403 | Tearney | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110299104 | Seo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120057345 | Kuchibhotla | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120236212 | Itoh | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120236288 | Stanley | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120314058 | Bendall | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130027711 | Hajian | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038881 | Pesach | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130038941 | Pesach | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130076857 | Kurashige | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130215406 | Heussler et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215428 | Ishimaru | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140049635 | Laffargue | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140055784 | Kremer | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140097252 | He | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104618 | Potsaid | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140239071 | Hennick | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140347672 | Pavillon | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150077760 | Koerner | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150253469 | Le Gros | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150316368 | Moench | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355470 | Herschbach | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160026838 | Gillet | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160102975 | McCloskey | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160202478 | Masson | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160290784 | Wojtkowski | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160349228 | Kester | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170135584 | Tearney | May 2017 | A1 |
20170336626 | Hayashi | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005041203 | Mar 2007 | DE |
1040927 | Oct 2000 | EP |
H04196513 | Jul 1992 | JP |
H08124829 | May 1996 | JP |
H08250446 | Sep 1996 | JP |
H08330220 | Dec 1996 | JP |
H10335215 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2000-206449 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001-513191 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002236371 | Aug 2002 | JP |
3380878 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2007027742 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007079458 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2008089617 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-309707 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2008309706 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009069592 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2012-058068 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2014-501937 | Jan 2014 | JP |
I333059 | Nov 2010 | TW |
WO 1995035516 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 2003065427 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2004109225 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2009070459 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2012057707 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2013116516 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013129519 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bragg%27s_law. |
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/cell. |
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/compartment. |
PCT International Search Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/SG2015/000075 dated Jun. 16, 2015, 3 pages. |
Gallegos et al., “Label-free biodetection using a smartphone,” Lab on a Chip, The Royal Society of Chemistry, RSC Publishing, 2013, pp. 2124-2132. |
Global mobile statistics 2014 Home: all the latest stats onmobileWeb, apps, marketing, advertising, subscribers, and trends . . . , mobiThinking, Dec. 2013, retrieved from <<https://www.mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats>>, 9 pages. |
Heussler, “Design, Micro-Manufacturing, and Characterization of a New Fast Parallel-Processing Fourier Transform Interferometer (FTIR) with Single Non-Periodic Pulse Capability,” National University of Singapore, 2010, 232 pages. |
Image Intesifier Tubes—PHOTONIS, 2012, 3 pages. |
Lyon et al., “DETECHIP: An Improved Molecular Sensing Array,” Forensic Research, 2011, vol. 2, Issue 4, retrived from <<https://www.omicsonline.org/2157-7145/2157-7145-2-126.pdf>>, pp. 1-7. |
Manzardo et al., “Miniature lamellar grating interferometer based on silicon technology,” Optics Letters, Jul. 1, 2004, vol. 29, No. 13, pp. 1437-1439. |
Smith et al., “Cell-Phone-Based Platform for Biomedical Device Development and Education Applications,” retrieved from <<http://www.plosone.org>>, PlosONE, vol. 6, Issue 3, Mar. 2011, pp. 1-11. |
Strong et al., “Lamellar Grating Far-Infrared Interferomer,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 50, No. 2, Feb. 1960, pp. 113-118. |
Moser, H.O., et al., “Single-shot-capable fast multichannel Fourier transform interferometer based on a microfabricated 3D multimirror array”, Proc. of SPIE, 2012, vol. 8428, pp. 84280Y-1-84280Y-10. |
Fukuda, M. et al., “Three-dimensional patterning using fine step motion in synchrotron radiation lithography”. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B-J Vac Sci Technol B. 24. 10.1116/1.2366620. (2006). |
Harvey, E. et al., “Fabrication Techniques and their application to produce novel Micromachined Structures and Devices using Excimer Laser Projection,” Proc. SPIE,, vol. 3223, 1997. |
Heussler, S. et al., “Multichannel Fourier-Transform Interferometry for Fast Signals”, Optics Express, v. 19, n 13, pg. 12628-12633 (Jun. 20, 2011). |
Heussler S. et al., “Pulsed and High-Speed FTIR Spectroscopy”, Next-Generation Spectroscopic Technologies V, SPIE v. 8374, n. 1 (May 11, 2012). |
Heussler S. et al., “3D Deep X-Ray Lithography for Producing a Multi-VChannel Fourier Transform Interferometer”, Microsystem Technologies, v. 19, n. 3, pg. 335-341 (Mar. 1, 2013). |
Hirai et al., “Moving mask UV lithography for three-dimensional structuring,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, v. 17, n. 2, p. 199-206, 2007. |
Katoh et al., “Direct writing for three-dimensional microfabrication using synchrotron radiation etching”, Sensors and Actuators, v. 89, p. 10-15, 2001. |
Lewis, M.F. et al., “The Use of Lenslet Arrays in Spatial Light Modulators”, Pure and Applied Optics: J. of the Euro. Optical Society, Part A, v. 3, n. 2 (Mar. 1, 1994). |
Rizvi, N. et al., “Developments in laser micro-machining techniques,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, v. 127, 2002, p. 206-210. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170016770 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61952583 | Mar 2014 | US |