OPTICAL MEASURING DEVICE

Abstract

An optical measuring device according to the present invention includes: a plane mirror (3), which has a central opening that functions as either a light entering window or a light source fitting hole (5) and an observation window 6′ that enables a photodetector (6) to take measurements; and an integrating hemisphere (2), which has its center of radius of curvature defined within the central opening of the plane mirror (3) and of which the inner wall surface functions as a light diffuse reflective surface (1). The plane mirror (3) and the integrating hemisphere (2) form an integrating space inside.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a sphere photometer according to a first preferred embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a sphere photometer according to a second preferred embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 shows the spatial distribution of the light produced by a cylindrical light source.

FIG. 4 shows a relative position of a photodetector 6 in a situation where there is a bundle of rays that enters an observation window 6′ directly from a light source 4.

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a sphere photometer according to a third preferred embodiment of the present invention in a situation where the photometer is used to take measurements of a plane light source.

FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of a sphere photometer according to a third preferred embodiment of the present invention in a situation where the photometer is used to take measurements of a cylindrical light source.

FIG. 7 shows measurement errors using the location of an observation window as a parameter in a situation where the total luminous flux of a plane light source is measured with a cylindrical light source regarded as a total luminous flux standard.

FIG. 8 shows the arrangement of the photometer disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 6-167388 (see FIG. 1).

FIG. 9 shows the operating principle of a sphere photometer.

FIGS. 10( a) and 10(b) show errors to be caused when a baffle is provided inside a sphere photometer.

FIG. 11 shows an error to be caused when a baffle is provided in a sphere photometer with the arrangement disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 6-167388 (see FIG. 1).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present inventors analyzed the behavior of light in an integrating space formed by an integrating hemisphere and a plane mirror as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 6-167388 (see FIG. 1) to discover that even if an observation window, which should be located on the sphere in the prior art according to its operating principle, was arranged on the plane mirror, the total luminous flux of a light source could still be measured and the baffle could be eliminated.

As already described in detail with reference to FIG. 9, the conventional principle of measuring the total luminous flux was derived by Equations on the illuminance on the inner wall surface of the integrating sphere, and has been believed to apply only to an spherical inner wall surface. However, as a result of researches, the present inventors discovered that contrary to the popular belief, the same principle also applies even to a plane mirror passing the center of a sphere. We acquired the basic idea of the present invention based on this discovery and adopts a novel arrangement in which the observation window is arranged on the plane mirror, thereby measuring the total luminous flux more accurately without using any baffle.

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Embodiment 1

A first preferred embodiment of an optical measuring device according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 1.

The optical measuring device of this preferred embodiment is a total luminous flux measuring device that includes an integrating hemisphere 2, of which the inner wall surface functions as a light diffuse reflective surface 1, and a plane mirror 3 to close the opening of the integrating hemisphere 2. The light diffuse reflective surface 1 is formed by either coating the inner surface of the integrating hemisphere 2 with a diffusive material that diffuses the radiation to be measured or processing the inner surface of the integrating hemisphere 2. The plane mirror 3 has a central opening that functions as either a light entering window or a light source fitting hole 5 and an observation window 6′ that enables a photodetector 6 to take measurements. The center of radius of curvature of the hemisphere 2 is defined within the central opening of the plane mirror 3 and the plane mirror 3 and the integrating hemisphere 2 form a hemispherical integrating space inside. And the light source 4, of which the total luminous flux should be measured, is fitted into the light source fitting hole 5 of the plane mirror 3.

The total luminous flux measuring device of this preferred embodiment is quite different from the conventional one in the location of the photodetector 6. Specifically, although an observation window to fit a photodetector in is located on the spherical wall surface of the integrating sphere, the observation window 2 to fit the photodetector 6 in is not located on the wall surface of the integrating hemisphere 2 but arranged on the plane mirror 3 according to this preferred embodiment.

Hereinafter, the operating principle of the measuring device of this preferred embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. 1.

In this preferred embodiment, the light source 4 under measurement is supposed to be a plane light source such as an LCD backlight that has a perfectly diffuse spatial distribution of light. As shown in FIG. 1, a line connecting the center of the observation window 6′ and an infinitesimal surface element A on the integrating hemisphere 2 together is supposed to define an angle θ_d with respect to a normal from the infinitesimal surface element A to the plane mirror 3. And the angle formed between a line connecting the center of the light source 4 (i.e., the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2) and the infinitesimal surface element A together and a normal to the light source 4 is supposed to be θ. Furthermore, if the light source 4 has a total luminous flux φ and a luminous intensity I₀(O) along the normal, then the following Equation (16) is satisfied:

φ=π·I₀(0)   (16)

According to the Lambert's cosine law, the luminous intensity I₀(θ) in the direction from the light source 4 to the infinitesimal surface element A is given by the following Equation (17):

I ₀(θ)=I₀(0)·cos θ=(φ/π)·cos θ/π=φ·cos θ/π  (17)

Supposing the integrating hemisphere has a radius of curvature of r, the illuminance E₀(θ) at the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall of the integrating sphere is represented by the following Equation (18):

E ₀(θ)=I₀(θ)/r²=φ·cos θ/(π·r²)   (18)

On the light diffuse reflective surface 1 on the inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2, perfectly diffuse reflection is produced at a reflectance ρ. Supposing the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall has an area ΔS, the luminous flux φ_a of the light reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A is represented by the following Equation (19):

φ_a=ρ·E₀(θ)·ΔS=ρ·ΔS·φ·cos θ/(π·r²)   (19)

If the photosensitive plane of the photodetector 6 is located so as to define an angle of θ+θ_d with respect to a normal to the infinitesimal surface element A, the luminous intensity I_a,d(θ) of the light with the luminous flux φ_a traveling from the infinitesimal surface element A to the photodetector 6 is calculated by the following Equation (20) because the infinitesimal surface element A is a perfectly diffuse reflective surface:

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{I}_{a,d}\left(\theta \right)=\left({\phi }_a/\pi \right)·\cos \left(\theta +{\theta }_d\right)\\ ={\phi }_a·\cos \left(\theta +{\theta }_d\right)/\pi \\ =\rho ·\Delta s·\Phi ·\cos \theta ·\cos \left(\theta +{\theta }_d\right)/\left({\pi }^2·r^2\right)\end{array}& \left(20\right)\end{array}$

Supposing the distance from the infinitesimal surface element A to the photosensitive plane of the photodetector 6 is L_ad, the illuminance E_a,d,1 of the first-order reflected light that has been emitted from the light source 4 with the luminous intensity I₀(θ), reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A and then detected at the photodetector 6 is given by the following Equation (21):

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{E}_{a,d,1}=I_{a,d}\left(\theta \right)/L_{\mathrm{ad}}^2\\ =\rho ·\Delta s·\Phi ·\cos \theta ·\cos \left(\theta +{\theta }_d\right)/\left({\pi }^2·r^2·L_{\mathrm{ad}}^2\right)\end{array}& \left(21\right)\end{array}$

On the other hand, the illuminance E_a,f of the light that has been radiated from the light source 4 in all directions and then incident on the infinitesimal surface element A is given by the following Equation (22) just like Equation (12):

E _a,f=ρ·φ/{(1−ρ)·π·r²}  (22)

However, the illuminance at the infinitesimal surface element A has been doubled due to the virtual image produced by the plane mirror 3.

The luminous flux φ_a,f of the light reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A with the illuminance E_a,f is given by the following Equation (23):

φ_a,f=ρ·E_a,f·ΔS=ρ²·ΔS·φ/{(1−ρ)·π·r²}  (23)

The luminous intensity I_a,d,f(θ) of the light that has been reflected with the luminous flux φ_a,f from the infinitesimal surface element A toward the photodetector 6 is calculated by the following Equation (24) because the infinitesimal surface element A is a perfectly diffuse reflective surface as in Equation (20):

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{i}_{a,d,f}\left(\theta \right)={\phi }_{a,d,f}·\cos \theta /\pi \\ ={\rho }^2·\Delta s·\phi ·\cos \theta /\left\{\left(1-\rho \right)·{\pi }^2·r^2\right\}\end{array}& \left(24\right)\end{array}$

Therefore, the illuminance E_a,d,f of the light that has been emitted from the light source 4 with the total luminous flux, reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A to be first-order reflected light, and then incident on the photodetector 6 is represented by the following Equation (25):

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{E}_{a,d,f}=I_{a,d,f}\left(\theta \right)/L_{\mathrm{ad}}^2\\ ={\rho }^2·\Delta s·\Phi ·\cos \theta /\left\{\left(1-\rho \right)·{\pi }^2·r^2·L_{\mathrm{ad}}^2\right\}\end{array}& \left(25\right)\end{array}$

That is to say, the illuminance E_a,d on the photosensitive plane of the photodetector 6 of the light that has come from the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 satisfies the following Equation (26):

E _a,d =E _a,d,1 +E _a,d,f   (26)

The E_a,d,1 to E_a,d,f ratio is given by the following Equation (27):

E _a,d,1 :E _a,d,f=cos(θ+θ_d):ρ/(1−ρ)   (27)

The ratio of the illuminance E_F,d,1 on the photodetector 6 of the first-order reflected light that has been emitted from the light source 4 and then reflected from the entire inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 to the illuminance E_F,d,f on the photodetector 6 of the diffuse reflected light that has been reflected from the entire inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 is equal to the value obtained by integrating (θ+θ_d) and θ with respect to the entire space for E_a,d,1 and E_a,d,f of Equation (27). That is why the ratio satisfies the following Equation (28):

E _F,d,1 :E _F,d,f=2π/3:π·ρ(1−ρ)=2/3:ρ/(1−ρ)   (28)

In this preferred embodiment, E_F,d,1 is calculated on the supposition that the light source 4 is a perfectly diffuse ideal plane light source. Actually, however, E_F,d,1 depends on the spatial distribution of the light emitted from the light source 4 as can be seen from Equation (17). On the other hand, E_F,d,f depends on the total luminous flux of the light source 4 and is not affected by its spatial distribution of light as can be seen from Equation (22). Consequently, E_F,d,1 becomes a systematic error when the total luminous flux is measured.

As can be seen from Equation (28), the ratio of E_F,d,1 to E_F,d,f is always constant and depends on neither θ nor the angle θ_d of the line connecting the center of the observation window 6′ and the infinitesimal surface element A together. In other words, E_F,d,f is always constant no matter where the observation window 6′ is located on the plane mirror 3.

In this case, if the integrating hemisphere 2 has a reflectance ρ of 95% or more, then E_F,d,1 will be 3.4% or less of E_F,d,f, which is a value in an extraordinary situation where one of the two light sources, of which the total luminous fluxes should be compared to each other, has an E_F,d,f of zero. That is to say, this value of 3.4% is an error to be caused when the light source 4, which has such a narrow band spatial distribution of light that the luminous intensity I₀(θ) in the direction from the light source 4 to the infinitesimal surface element A has a non-zero significant value but the luminous intensity I₀ is zero in the other directions, is compared to a light source with a perfectly diffuse spatial distribution of light. For example, such an error is caused when the total luminous flux of a perfectly diffuse light source is compared to that of the source of a light beam condensed only on the infinitesimal surface element A. That is why an error of at most 1% would occur ordinarily.

Of these two illuminances E_F,d,1 and E_F,d,f, it is E_F,d,1 that is affected by the spatial distribution of the light source 4, while the value of E_F,d,f is proportional to the total luminous flux irrespective of the spatial distribution of the light source 4. That is why when the total luminous fluxes of two light sources with almost the same spatial distribution of light are compared to each other, high accuracy is realized by this ideal integrating sphere in which no error is caused due to the self-absorption of the baffle 7.

Embodiment 2

A second preferred embodiment of an optical measuring device according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 2.

The photometer shown in FIG. 2 includes an integrating hemisphere 2, of which the inner wall surface functions as a light diffuse reflective surface 1, and a plane mirror 3, which is arranged so as to close the opening of the integrating hemisphere 2, including the center of curvature thereof. A light source 4, of which the total luminous flux should be measured, is fitted into a light source fitting window 5, which is arranged at the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2 on the surface of the plane mirror 3. Meanwhile, a photodetector 6 is fitted into an observation window 6′ on the surface of the plane mirror 3 but is arranged such that the light source 4 is invisible to the photodetector 6.

Next, the operating principle of the photometer of this preferred embodiment will be described.

The light source 4 of this preferred embodiment is a cylindrical light source such as a single-ended halogen lamp. More specifically, the filament of the light source 4 is arranged in the radial direction of the integrating hemisphere 2 perpendicularly to the plane mirror 3. Such a light source 4 has a spatial distribution of light as shown in FIG. 3.

A infinitesimal surface element A is supposed to be located at the intersection between a normal to the observation window 6′ and the integrating hemisphere 2. Also, for the sake of simplicity, the center of emission of the light source 4 is supposed to be located at the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2 and on the plane mirror 3.

If the light source 4 has the spatial distribution of light shown in FIG. 3, the luminous intensity I(θ) at an angle θ formed between a normal to the plane mirror, which passes the center of curvature, and a line drawn from the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2 to the infinitesimal surface element A is given by the following Equation (29):

I(θ)=I(π/2)·sin θ  (29)

The total luminous flux φ of the light source 4 is calculated by the following Equation (30):

φ=π²·I(π/2)   (30)

Therefore, the luminous intensity I₀(θ) in the direction from the light source 4 to the infinitesimal surface element A is represented by the following Equation (31):

I ₀(θ)=φ·sin θ/π²   (31)

Supposing the integrating hemisphere 2 has a radius of curvature of r, the illuminance E₀(θ) at the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall of the integrating sphere is represented by the following Equation (32):

E ₀(θ)=φ·sin θ/(π²·r²)   (32)

Supposing that perfectly diffuse reflection is produced at a reflectance ρ on the light diffuse reflective surface 1 on the inner wall of the integrating hemisphere and that the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall has an area ΔS, the luminous flux φ_a of the light reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A is represented by the following Equation (33):

φ_a=ρ·E₀(θ)·ΔS=ρ·ΔS·φ·sin θ/(π²·r²)   (33)

The photosensitive plane of the photodetector 6 is located so as to define an angle θ with respect to a normal to the infinitesimal surface element A. Thus, the luminous intensity I_a,d(θ) in the direction from the infinitesimal surface element A to the photodetector 6 is calculated by the following Equation (34) because the infinitesimal surface element A is a perfectly diffuse reflective surface:

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{I}_{a,d}\left(\theta \right)={\phi }_a·\cos \theta /\pi \\ =\rho ·\Delta S·\Phi ·\cos \theta ·\sin \theta /\left({\pi }^3·r^2\right)\end{array}& \left(34\right)\end{array}$

The distance from the infinitesimal surface element A to the photosensitive plane of the photodetector 6 is r·cos θ. Therefore, the illuminance E_a,d,1 of the first-order reflected light that has been emitted from the light source 4 with the luminous intensity I(θ), reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A and then detected at the photodetector 6 is given by the following Equation (35):

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{E}_{a,d,1}=I_{a,d}\left(\theta \right)/\left(r^2·{\cos }^2\theta \right)\\ =\rho ·\Delta S·\phi ·\sin \theta /\left({\pi }^3·r^4·\cos \theta \right)\end{array}& \left(35\right)\end{array}$

On the other hand, the illuminance E_a,d,f of the light that has been radiated from the light source 4 in all directions and then incident on the infinitesimal surface element A is given by the following Equation (36) just like Equation (25):

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{E}_{a,d,f}=I_{a,d,f}\left(\theta \right)/\left(r^2·{\cos }^2\theta \right)\\ ={\rho }^2·\Delta S·\phi /\left\{\left(1-\rho \right)·{\pi }^2·r^4·\cos \theta \right\}\end{array}& \left(36\right)\end{array}$

The illuminance E_a,d on the photosensitive plane of the photodetector 6 of the light that has come from the infinitesimal surface element A satisfies the following Equation (37):

E _a,d =E _a,d,1 +E _a,d,f   (37)

The E_a,d,1 to E_d,f ratio is given by the following Equation (38):

E _a,d,1 :E _a,d,f=1:ρ·π/{(1−ρ)·sin θ}  (38)

Therefore, the following Equation (39) is satisfied:

E _a,d,1 =E _a,d,f·(1−ρ)·sin θ/ρ·π<E_a,d,f·(1−ρ)/ρ·π  (39)

The ratio of the illuminance E_F,d,1 on the photodetector 6 of the first-order reflected light that has been emitted from the light source 4 and then reflected from the entire inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 to the illuminance E_F,d,f on the photodetector 6 of the diffuse reflected light that has been reflected from the entire inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 is equal to the value obtained by integrating θ with respect to the entire space for E_a,d,1 and E_a,d,f of Equation (39). That is why the ratio satisfies the following Inequality (40):

E _F,d,1 <E _F,d,f·(1−ρ)/ρ·π  (40)

This Inequality (40) is always satisfied no matter where the observation window 6′ is located on the plane mirror 3. If the integrating hemisphere 2 has a reflectance ρ of 95% or more, E_F,d,1 becomes 1.7% or less of E_F,d,f.

The value of E_F,d,1 is affected by the spatial distribution of the light source 4, while the value of E_F,d,f is proportional to the total luminous flux irrespective of the spatial distribution of the light source 4. That is why when the total luminous fluxes of two light sources with almost the same spatial distribution of light are compared to each other, high accuracy is realized by this ideal integrating sphere including no baffle 7 inside.

Compared to the primary standard lamp specified as a national standard of a total luminous flux standard lamp, a single-ended halogen lamp can be lit at a lower distribution temperature of approximately 3,000 K and can maintain a higher percentage of the luminous flux for a short time due to its halogen cycle. That is why the single-ended halogen lamp can be used effectively as a total luminous flux/spectral regular standard. If the total luminous flux of a plane light source is measured using such a single-ended halogen lamp as a total luminous flux standard, the error will be 1.7% or less, provided that the reflectance ρ on the light diffuse reflective surface 1 of the integrating hemisphere 2 is 95%.

The errors of a plane light source and a cylindrical light source are E_F,d,1 to be superposed when these light sources are supposed to be one, which are systematic errors proportional to the total luminous flux. That is why the deviation from the ratio of φ+E_F,d,1 of the plane light source to φ+E_a,d,1 of the cylindrical light source is supposed to be the error in such a situation and the error can be estimated as the ratio of these illuminances.

In the preferred embodiment described above, the center of emission of the light source 4 is supposed to be located at the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2 and on the plane mirror 3 for the sake of simplicity. Actually, however, the light source 4 is located at a height L_h on the reflective mirror 3. In that case, there is a bundle of rays that enters the observation window 6′ from the light source 4 as shown in FIG. 4. And if this bundle of rays entered the photodetector 6, a measurement error would be caused.

Supposing the distance from the center of the hole 5 of the plane mirror 3, to which the light source 4 is inserted, to that of the observation window 6′ is L, the radius of the observation window 6′ is R₁, the radius of the photosensitive plane of the photodetector 6 is R₂, and the distance from the surface of the plane mirror 3 opposed to the integrating hemisphere 2 to the photosensitive plane of the photodetector 6 is L_d, the triangle formed by L−R₁ and L_h will be analogous to the triangle formed by R₁+R₂ and L_d. That is why if the photodetector 6 is arranged so as to satisfy the following Inequality (41), the photodetector 6 never receives the light that has come directly from the light source 4. As a result, no measurement errors will be caused.

L _d >L _h(R₁+R₂)/(L−R₁)   (41)

Embodiment 3

A third preferred embodiment of an optical measuring device according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 5.

The device of this preferred embodiment (total luminous flux measuring device) includes an integrating hemisphere 2, of which the inner wall surface functions as a light diffuse reflective surface 1, and a plane mirror 3, which is arranged so as to close the opening of the integrating hemisphere 2, including the center of curvature thereof. A light source 4, of which the total luminous flux should be measured, is fitted into a light source fitting window 5, which is arranged at the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2 on the surface of the plane mirror 3. In this preferred embodiment, a luminometer 8 measures the luminance at an infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 through an observation window 6′ on the plane mirror 3.

Next, the operating principle of the photometer of this preferred embodiment will be described.

Suppose the center of the observation window 6′ is located on a normal to the plane mirror 3 from the infinitesimal surface element A on the integrating hemisphere 2 and the light source 4 under measurement is a plane light source with a perfectly diffuse spatial distribution of light such as an LCD backlight. The angle formed between a normal to the light source 4 and a line connecting the center of the light source 4 (which is also the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2) to the infinitesimal surface element A is supposed to be θ. And if the total luminous flux of the light source 4 is φ and the luminous intensity along the normal to the light source 4 is I₀(0), the following Equation (42) is satisfied:

φ=π·I₀(0)   (42)

Therefore, the luminous intensity I₀(θ) in the direction from the light source 4 to the infinitesimal surface element A is represented by the following Equation (43):

I ₀(θ)=φ·cos θ/π  (43)

Supposing the integrating hemisphere 2 has a radius of curvature of r, the illuminance E₀(θ) of the first-order light that has come from the light source 4 (i.e., direct light) at the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall of the integrating sphere is represented by the following Equation (44):

E ₀(θ)=φ·cos θ/(π·r²)   (44)

If perfectly diffuse reflection is produced at a reflectance ρ on the light diffuse reflective surface 1 on the inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2, the luminous emittance M_a,1 of the first-order light (i.e., the direct light) that has come from the light source 4 and then reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A is represented by the following Equation (45):

M _a,1 =ρ·E ₀(θ)=ρ·φ·cos θ/(π·r²)   (45)

The observation window 6′ is arranged so as to define an angle θ with respect to the normal to the infinitesimal surface element A, which is a perfectly diffuse reflective surface. That is why the luminance B_a,d,1(θ) in the direction from the infinitesimal surface element A to the observation window 6′ is represented by the following Equation (46):

B _a,d,1(θ)=M_a,1·cos θ/π=ρ·φ·cos² θ/(π²·r²)   (46)

On the other hand, the illuminance E_a,f of the light that has been radiated from the light source 4 in all directions and then incident on the infinitesimal surface element A is given by the following Equation (47) just like Equation (22):

E _a,f=ρ·φ/{(1−ρ)·π·r²}  (47)

However, the illuminance at the infinitesimal surface element A is doubled due to a virtual image produced by the plane mirror 3.

The luminous emittance M_a,f of the light reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A with the illuminance E_a,f is represented by the following Equation (48):

M _a,f =ρ·E _a,f=ρ²·φ/{(1−ρ)·π·r²}  (48)

At this luminous emittance M_a,f, the luminance B_a,d,f(θ) in the direction from the infinitesimal surface element A to the photodetector 6 is given by the following Equation (49) because the infinitesimal surface element A is a perfectly diffuse reflective surface:

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{B}_{a,d,f}\left(\theta \right)={\phi }_{a,d,f}·\cos \theta /\pi \\ ={\rho }^2·\phi ·\cos \theta /\left\{\left(1-\rho \right)·{\pi }^2·r^2\right\}\end{array}& \left(49\right)\end{array}$

That is to say, the luminance B_a,d in the direction from the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 to the observation window 6′ is represented by the following Equation (50):

B _a,d =B _a,d,1 +B _a,d,f   (50)

This luminance B_a,d is measured by the luminometer 8.

B_a,d,1 may be represented by way of B_a,d,f as in the following Equation (51):

B _a,d,1 =B _a,d,f·cos θ·(1−ρ)/ρ  (51)

In this case, if the infinitesimal surface element A is located at θ=75 degrees and if the integrating hemisphere 2 has an inner wall reflectance ρ of 95% or more, then B_a,d,1 will be 1.5% or less of B_a,d,f. It is B_a,d,1 that is affected by the spatial distribution of the light source 4, while the value of B_a,d,f is proportional to the total luminous flux irrespective of the spatial distribution of the light source 4. That is why when the total luminous fluxes of two light sources with almost the same spatial distribution of light are compared to each other, high accuracy is realized by this ideal integrating sphere including no baffle 7 inside.

Furthermore, the closer to the wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 the photodetector 6 gets, the greater θ, the smaller B_a,d,1, and the smaller the error.

FIG. 6 shows how to take measurements of a cylindrical light source using the photometer of this preferred embodiment. Hereinafter, the operation to be done in that case will be described.

Suppose the center of the observation window 6′ is located on a normal to the plane mirror 3 from the infinitesimal surface element A on the integrating hemisphere 2 and the light source 4 under measurement is a plane light source with a perfectly diffuse spatial distribution of light such as an LCD backlight.

The light source 4 is a cylindrical light source such as a single-ended halogen lamp. More specifically, the filament of the light source 4 is arranged in the radial direction of the integrating hemisphere perpendicularly to the plane mirror 3. Such a light source 4 has a spatial distribution of light as shown in FIG. 3.

For the sake of simplicity, the center of emission of the light source 4 is supposed to be located at the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2 and on the plane mirror 3. Supposing the angle defined by the line connecting the center of curvature of the integrating hemisphere 2 to the infinitesimal surface element A is θ, the luminous intensity I(θ) in that direction is given by the following Equation (52):

I(θ)=I(π/2)·sin θ  (52)

The total luminous flux φ of the light source 4 is calculated by the following Equation (53):

φ=π²·I(π/2)   (53)

Therefore, the luminous intensity I₀(θ) in the direction from the light source 4 to the infinitesimal surface element A is represented by the following Equation (54):

I ₀(θ)=φ·sin θ/π²   (54)

Supposing the integrating hemisphere 2 has a radius of curvature of r, the illuminance E₀(θ) at the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall of the integrating sphere is represented by the following Equation (55):

E ₀(θ)=φ·sin θ/(π²·r²)   (55)

If perfectly diffuse reflection is produced at a reflectance ρ on the light diffuse reflective surface 1 on the inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2, the luminous emittance M_a,1 of the first-order light (i.e., the direct light) that has come from the light source 4 and then reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A is represented by the following Equation (56):

M _a,1 =ρ·E ₀(θ)=ρ·φ·sin θ/(π²·r²)   (56)

The observation window 6′ is arranged so as to define an angle θ with respect to the normal to the infinitesimal surface element A, which is a perfectly diffuse reflective surface. That is why the luminance B_a,d,1(θ) in the direction from the infinitesimal surface element A to the observation window 6′ is represented by the following Equation (57):

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{B}_{a,d,1}\left(\theta \right)=M_{a,1}·\cos \theta /\pi \\ =\rho ·\Phi ·\sin \theta ·\cos \theta /\left({\pi }^3·r^2\right)\end{array}& \left(57\right)\end{array}$

On the other hand, the illuminance E_a,f of the light that has been radiated from the light source 4 in all directions and then incident on the infinitesimal surface element A is given by the following Equation (58) just like Equation (22):

E _a,f=ρ·φ/{(1−ρ)·π·r²}  (58)

However, the illuminance at the infinitesimal surface element A is doubled due to a virtual image produced by the plane mirror 3.

The luminous emittance M_a,f of the light reflected from the infinitesimal surface element A with the illuminance E_a,f is represented by the following Equation (59):

M _a,f =ρ·E _a,f=ρ²·φ/{(1−ρ)·π·r²}  (59)

At this luminous emittance M_a,f, the luminance B_a,d,f(θ) in the direction from the infinitesimal surface element A to the photodetector 6 is given by the following Equation (60) because the infinitesimal surface element A is a perfectly diffuse reflective surface:

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{B}_{a,d,f}\left(\theta \right)={\phi }_{a,d,f}·\cos \theta /\pi \\ ={\rho }^2·\Phi ·\cos \theta /\left\{\left(1-\rho \right)·{\pi }^2·r^2\right\}\end{array}& \left(60\right)\end{array}$

That is to say, the luminance B_a,d in the direction from the infinitesimal surface element A on the inner wall of the integrating hemisphere 2 to the observation window 6′ is represented by the following Equation (61):

B _a,d =B _a,d,1 +B _a,d,f   (61)

This luminance B_a,d is measured by the luminometer 8.

B_a,d,1 may be represented by way of B_a,d,f as in the following Equation (62):

B _a,d,1 =B _a,d,f·sin θ·(1−ρ)/(π·ρ)   (62)

In this case, if the observation window 6′ is located at θ=30 degrees and if the reflectance ρ is 95% or more, then B_a,d,1 will be 1% or less of B_a,d,f. It is B_a,d,1 that is affected by the spatial distribution of the light source 4, while the value of B_a,d,f is proportional to the total luminous flux irrespective of the spatial distribution of the light source 4. That is why when the total luminous fluxes of two light sources with almost the same spatial distribution of light are compared to each other, high accuracy is realized by this ideal integrating sphere including no baffle 7 inside.

This value of 1% is the biggest error to be caused when a light source with such a narrow band spatial distribution of light that the luminous intensity I₀(θ) in the direction from the light source 4 to the point A becomes zero is subjected to measurement in comparison with a light source with the perfectly diffuse spatial distribution of light described above. The closer to the light source 4 the observation window 6′ gets, the smaller θ, the greater this ratio, and the smaller the error.

FIG. 7 shows errors to be caused when the total luminous flux of a plane light source is measured with a single-ended halogen lamp used as a total luminous flux standard. The integrating hemisphere 2 is supposed to have a reflectance ρ of 95% on the light diffuse reflective surface 1. The errors of the plane light source and a cylindrical light source are B_a,d,1 to be superposed when these light sources are supposed to be one and are systematic errors that are proportional to the total luminous flux. That is why the deviation of the ratio of B_a,d of the plane light source to B_a,d,1 of the cylindrical light source from one is regarded as representing the error in this case. The abscissa represents the value obtained by normalizing the distance from the center of the integrating hemisphere to the observation window 6′ with the radius of the integrating hemisphere.

As can be seen from FIG. 7, if the plane light source is subjected to measurements by reference to the cylindrical light source, the measurements can be done with the error reduced to 3% or less by arranging the observation window 6′ at a distance corresponding to 65% or more of the radius of the integrating hemisphere 2 as measured from the center of the integrating hemisphere 2.

The optical measuring device of the present invention has an observation window on a plane mirror that passes the center of an integrating hemisphere, and therefore, can prevent light that has come directly from a light source from entering the observation window without providing any baffle in the integrating space. As a result, there is no self-absorption of the baffle and no vignette of reflected bundle of rays, thus reducing measurement errors due to these phenomena. Therefore, the optical measuring device of the present invention can be used effectively in estimating the total luminous flux of not just a general illumination source like a light bulb or a fluorescent lamp but also an LCD backlight, a light source system for electronic billboards, or a self-emitting flat display such as a PDP.

While the present invention has been described with respect to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the disclosed invention may be modified in numerous ways and may assume many embodiments other than those specifically described above. Accordingly, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all modifications of the invention that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

1. An optical measuring device comprising: a plane mirror, which has a central opening that functions as either a light entering window or a light source fitting hole and an observation window that enables a photodetector to take measurements; anda hemisphere, which has its center of radius of curvature defined within the central opening of the plane mirror and of which the inner wall surface functions as a light diffuse reflective surface,wherein the plane mirror and the hemisphere form an integrating space inside.

2. The optical measuring device of claim 1, wherein the photodetector is fitted into the observation window of the plane mirror.

3. The optical measuring device of claim 1, wherein in a situation where a light source, fitted into the central opening, protrudes from the plane mirror into the integrating space to a height Lh, if the distance from the center of the central opening to the center of the observation window is L, the observation window has a radius R1, and a photosensitive plane of the photodetector has a radius R2, the photodetector is Ld below the observation window and satisfies Ld>Lh(R1+R2)/(L−R1).

4. The optical measuring device of claim 1, wherein no baffle is arranged in the integrating space.

5. The optical measuring device of claim 1, wherein the photodetector is a luminometer.

6. The optical measuring device of claim 5, wherein the distance from the observation window to the central opening is 65% or more of the radius of curvature of the hemisphere.