Optically controlled MEM switches

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6803559
  • Patent Number
    6,803,559
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 15, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 12, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
An optically controlled micro-electromechanical (MEM) switch is described which desirably utilizes photoconductive properties of a semiconductive substrate upon which MEM switches are fabricated. In one embodiment the bias voltage provided for actuation of the switch is altered by illuminating an optoelectric portion of the switch to deactivate the switch. In an alternative embodiment, a photovoltaic device provides voltage to actuate the switch without any bias lines at all. Due to the hysteresis of the electromechanical switching as a function of applied voltage, only modest variation of voltage applied to the switch is necessary to cause the switch to open or close sharply under optical control.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention pertains to microfabricated electromechanical (MEM) switches which may be fabricated on a substrate.




BACKGROUND




MEM switches in various forms are well-known in the art. U.S. Pat. No. 5,121,089 to Larson, granted in 1992, describes an example of a MEM switch in which the armature rotates symmetrically about a post. Larson also suggested cantilevered beam MEM switches, in “Microactuators for GaAs—based microwave integrated circuits” by L. E. Larson et al., Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 10, 404-407 (1993).




MEM switches are very useful for controlling very high frequency lines, such as antenna feed lines and switches operating above 1 GHz, due to their relatively low insertion loss and high isolation value at these frequencies. Therefore, they are particularly useful for controlling high frequency antennas, as is taught by U.S. Pat. No. 5,541,614 to Lam et al. (1996). Such use generally requires an array of MEM switches, and an N×N array of MEM switches requires N


2


+1 output lines and N


2


control circuits for direct electrical control. These control lines may need to be shielded to avoid interfering with the high frequency antenna lines, and accordingly add considerable complexity and cost to the fabrication of these switches.




Thus, there exists a need for controlling the MEM switches in such an array by a means which reduces the difficulties imposed by routing control lines.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention alleviates the above-noted problem of providing control lines for an array MEM switches, and provides other benefits as well. In particular, it provides a mechanism for controlling MEM switches with light, with attendant benefits such as isolation, and indeed remoteness, from a controlling light source.




The present invention provides optical control of MEM switches. In a preferred embodiment, two DC bias lines are provided to the vicinity of each MEM switch. On-off control of the switch is then effected by focusing light on the switch substrate. Under illumination, the photo-conductive nature of the semi-insulated substrate causes voltage loss in a series bias resistor to reduce the DC bias voltage applied to the switch. The switches may be used in combination to control an antenna array. Another embodiment of the invention employs a photovoltaic device to provide actuating voltage under illumination, thus obviating all bias lines.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a top view of a MEM switch suitable for the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a lateral cross-sectional view of the MEM switch of

FIG. 1

, open.





FIG. 3

is a lateral cross-sectional view of the MEM switch of

FIG. 1

, closed.





FIG. 4

shows the hysteresis of switch state as a function of applied voltage.





FIG. 5

shows details of the photoresistor area of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 6

is a schematic of application and control of bias voltage to the MEM switch.





FIG. 7

shows the substrate with first metal layer in place.





FIG. 8

is as

FIG. 7

after selective addition of a sacrificial layer.





FIG. 9

shows selective addition of an insulating layer and etching of contact dimple.





FIG. 10

shows addition of cantilever conductor metallization and final insulating layer.





FIG. 11

shows an array of optically controlled MEM switches.





FIG. 12

shows a photovoltaically actuated MEM switch with no external bias lines.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

shows a plan view of a preferred embodiment of an optically controlled MEM switch according to the present invention. Cantilever beam


10


, preferably 24 microns wide, supports armature structure


12


which includes armature electrostatic plate


14


, which is preferably about 100 microns square, and also switch conductor


16


. A substrate electrostatic plate


40


, not shown in this figure, is approximately the same size as armature electrostatic plate


14


, and is positioned behind armature structure


12


in this top view and visible only as dotted lines. The width of switch conductor


16


depends on usage; shown proportionally to be about 30 microns, it may be narrower and in the preferred embodiment is 69 microns wide for a desirable high frequency impedance. Switch conductor


16


is insulated from armature electrostatic plate


14


by armature insulating region


30


, which in the preferred embodiment is about 30 microns. Switch conductor


16


terminates at each end with contact dimples


18


. Armature electrostatic plate


14


is connected to substrate armature pad


26


through cantilever beam conductor


28


and armature via


24


. Anchor structure


20


attaches cantilever beam


10


to the substrate (not identified in

FIG. 1

) by means of four anchors, e.g.


22


, plus armature via


24


.




Signal “A” metallization


32


terminates below a first switch dimple


18


of armature structure


12


, as shown in dashed lines. Signal “B” metallization


34


similarly terminates below a second switch dimple


18


of armature structure


12


. Substrate electrostatic pad connection


36


conducts a common potential to substrate electrostatic pad


40


(designated in

FIG. 2

) which is disposed on the substrate below armature electrostatic pad


14


and indicated in

FIG. 1

by dashed lines below armature electrostatic plate


14


. When the switch is closed, Signal A is connected to Signal B through the switch dimples


18


and switch conductor


16


.





FIG. 2

shows a section of the MEM switch of

FIG. 1

taken along the indicated section line. In order to clarify the boundaries of substrate electrostatic plate


40


, substrate electrostatic plate connection


36


is not shown where it extends below cantilever


10


. Insulating layers


42


are disposed on the top and bottom of armature assembly


12


and support switch conductor


16


. Lower and upper armature insulators


42


each have approximately equal differential stress with the armature metallization (e.g. 14, 28), and accordingly the differentials are balanced to minimize bowing of the armature. Plate


14


is connected to substrate armature pad


26


by cantilever beam conductor


28


and armature via


24


. Switch conductor


16


is seen where it merges with dimple


18


, which protrudes through the lower of armature insulations


42


. The termination of Signal “A” connection


32


is seen disposed below switch connection dimple


18


. Substrate


44


underlies all of this structure. Substrate


44


is preferably only about 100 microns thick, partly for purposes of signal line impedance control, but is not represented proportionally.





FIG. 3

shows the MEM switch section of

FIG. 2

, but in closed position. A voltage is applied between armature electrostatic plate


14


and substrate electrostatic plate


40


. Armature structure


12


is drawn down toward substrate


44


by electrostatic force, and counterbalanced by the restoring spring force proportional to the displacement of cantilever beam


10


. (The restoring spring force is provided by elastic resistance to deformation of armature conductor


28


plus upper and lower armature insulators


42


; the armature structure is supported from substrate


44


by anchor structure


20


). As the applied voltage continues to increase, the electrostatic force, which is proportional to the bias voltage and inversely proportional to the square of the gap between the two plates, will eventually exceed the restoring spring force of cantilever beam


10


, and the balance cannot be maintained. At this so-called “snap-down” voltage, plate


14


snaps down and firmly rests on plate


40


, such that as little as the lower armature insulation


42


may separate the plates. Insulating region


30


flexes somewhat, providing force so that dimple


18


presses firmly against signal “A” conductor


32


, ensuring repeatable and reliable connection between them.




Hysteresis in the actuation of the switch is important to crisp functioning.

FIG. 4

shows switch state as a function of applied voltage, which demonstrates the hysteresis characteristics of a typical RF MEM switch. As the applied voltage increases, the switch state will follow the path indicated by the arrows having solid-line shafts. Thus, the switch will turn from the “off” state to the “on” state as the applied voltage exceeds snap-down voltage V


2


. However, when the applied voltage has exceeded V


2


and then is decreased, the switch state will follow the path indicated by the arrows having dashed-line shafts. Thus, the switch will not turn back to the “off” state as the applied bias voltage decreases to just below snap-down voltage V


2


, but rather will remain in the “on” state until the applied bias voltage drops to “hold-on” voltage V


1


. The switch then opens abruptly when the applied bias voltage drops just below hold-on voltage V


1


. The on-off differential, V


2


−V


1


, is typically a few volts; for example, in the preferred embodiment which has a snap-down voltage of 60 V, the on-off differential V


2


−V


1


is 5V. The hysteresis of the switch actuation in response to applied voltage, along with the photo-conductive nature of the MEM switch described herein, are foundations of the present invention.





FIG. 5

shows details which form the electrical components used in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, and may be more readily understood with reference to the electrical schematic shown in FIG.


6


. In

FIG. 6

, Bias and Common are applied to exceed the snap-down voltage, preferably about 60V, and are provided by a bias supply (not shown). R


b


is a series bias resistor, preferably about 1 megohm. R


p


is a photoresistor, which is preferably simply part of the substrate. If R


p


is part of the substrate, then the substrate is preferably semi-insulating GaAs. When light is directed onto R


p


, the resistance decreases from about 100 megohms to about 10 megohms. Consequently, the voltage available between Plate


A


, the armature electrostatic plate, and Plate


S


, the substrate electrostatic plate, varies depending upon the intensity of light directed upon R


p


. In the preferred embodiment, 60V is applied to the switch when the substrate is dark, exceeding snap-down voltage and closing the MEM switch, while under strong illumination 54 V is applied, which is less than the hold-down voltage and thus opens the switch.




Returning to

FIG. 5

, bias is supplied to bias connection


48


from elsewhere, being common to all switches in an array. Bias resistor


46


is preferably 40 to 50 squares of sputtered CrSiO in a 6 micron line width, and conducts current from the bias source to armature substrate pad


26


through an appropriate resistance of preferably about 1 megohm. Bias resistor


46


is preferably covered with any non-conductive opaque material to prevent photoresistive effects from reducing its resistance. Current from the bias source is conducted from armature substrate pad


26


to the armature electrostatic pad, not shown, through armature via


24


of anchor structure


20


, and through cantilever beam conductor


28


, without further significant resistance. Bias supply Common (

FIG. 6

) may be provided to the substrate electrostatic plate, not shown, along substrate electrostatic connection


36


, without significant resistance.




Semi-insulating GaAs substrate is preferably below all of the structure of FIG.


5


. Illumination of the substrate reduces its resistance to very roughly 10 megohms per square. Accordingly, when illuminated the substrate in gap


50


between armature substrate pad


26


and substrate electrostatic connection


36


conducts sufficient current to reduce the voltage available between the armature and substrate electrostatic plates so that the switch opens.




Switch Fabrication





FIGS. 7-10

show fabrication steps leading to the completed MEM switch shown in FIG.


2


. Substrate


44


is preferably semi-insulating GaAs about 100 microns thick, and is chosen primarily for compatibility with the circuit in which the resulting MEM switch will be employed. Any semi-insulating substrate which exhibits a resistance varying under illumination by visible or infrared light may be used, which can to be achieved using InP or Si, for example. Other substrates which do not inherently have photoconductive properties may also be used, such as ceramics or polyimides, but would require creation of a separate photoresistor. The thickness of the substrate is largely determined by requirements for the circuit, such as obtaining appropriate spacing from a ground plane for control of the transmission line characteristics of traces.




In

FIG. 7

, metallization has been patterned upon substrate


44


to form armature substrate pad


26


, substrate electrostatic plate


40


, and Signal A conductor


32


. Any technique may be employed to provide the patterned metallization, including for example lithographic resist lift-off or resist definition and metal etch, but also less common techniques. This metallization is preferably begun with about 250-500 Å of Ti to ensure adhesion to the substrate, followed by about 1000 Å of Pt to protect the Ti from diffusion of Au, and about 2000 Å of Au. Any compatible metallization may be employed, but will of course affect the properties of the completed MEM switch.




In

FIG. 8

, sacrificial support layer


72


, preferably two micron thick SiO


2


, is deposited using any compatible technique, such as plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), or sputtering. The thickness of sacrificial support layer


72


affects the spacing of the electrostatic plates and the switch opening, which are both important design parameters. A via


74


is also formed through layer


72


, which may be accomplished, for example, by means of lithographic photoresist and etch.




In

FIG. 9

, the first armature structural layer


82


has been patterned. Structural layer


82


is preferably silicon nitride, but can also be other materials, desirably having a low etch rate compared to sacrificial layer


72


. Via


84


may be formed by any technique, for example lithography and dry etch, but it is desirable that an etch step remove a portion of sacrificial layer


72


below via


84


to form a dimple receptacle extending a controlled depth below first structural layer


82


.





FIG. 10

shows the result of two further steps. A second metallization pattern has been added to form dimple


18


, switch conductor


16


, armature electrostatic plate


14


and cantilever beam conductor


28


, and it adheres to armature substrate pad


26


to form armature via


24


. This metallization, typically sputter deposited, is preferably 200 Å of Ti followed by 1000 Å of Au (thinner than the metallization mentioned above), but of course alternative metals and thicknesses may be selected.

FIG. 10

also shows second structural layer


92


, added and patterned after the second metallization step. Second structural layer


92


is preferably the same material and thickness as first structural layer


82


, described above with regard to

FIG. 9

, in order to balance the stresses within the armature and thereby minimize bowing of the armature.




To complete the MEM switch a further fabrication step of wet etching to remove sacrificial layer


72


is performed, which results in the switch as shown in FIG.


2


. Sputter deposition of the bias resistor may be performed thereafter, as well as a step of opaquely coating the bias resistor if desired. It is also possible to deposit the bias resistor before the step of deposition of sacrificial layer


72


. Indeed, if an opaque material is selected for sacrificial layer


72


, then simply preventing etch of sacrificial layer


72


in the area of the bias resistor will protect the bias resistor from leakage due to illumination.




Additional Embodiments





FIG. 11

shows an array of MEM switches according to the present invention for changing the characteristics of an antenna. The correct bias supply voltage is applied by connection


103


to each optically controlled MEM switch


107


, which also has bias supply common


105


connected thereto. Each MEM switch


107


may be selectively illuminated by directing light at its photoelectric element individually, for example by means of an optical fiber mounted appropriately, such that antenna elements


101


are selectively connected. The antenna array may extend up toward Antenna A, or continue down toward Antenna B. The antenna elements can be varied widely to provide a finely tunable antenna.





FIG. 12

shows a MEM switch fabricated with a photovoltaic device


120


mounted along with MEM switch


1


to form a hybrid. Photovoltaic device


120


is a representative integrated circuit having seventy two individual photovoltaic cells, e.g.


125


, connected in series, with the ends of the series of photovoltaic cells connected to bonding pads


123


and


124


. Bond wire


121


connects the first bond pad


123


of photovoltaic device


120


to substrate electrostatic plate connection


36


, and bond wire


122


connects the second bond pad


124


of photovoltaic device


120


to armature electrostatic plate connection


26


. When illuminated, the photovoltaic device produces sufficient voltage to actuate the switch (greater than 60 V in the presently preferred embodiment), and thus no bias lines for MEM switch


1


need be connected to a bias supply or other external drive source, as is required for other embodiments. The hybrid fabrication shown in

FIG. 12

is the presently preferred embodiment, and is compatible with virtually any surface upon which a MEM switch may be fabricated, so that the MEM switch may be fabricated upon a wide variety of substrate-like surfaces. However, a photovoltaic device may instead be fabricated into a substrate by appropriate processing. For example, Si or GaAs substrates can be processed to produce a photovoltaic device comprising many photovoltaic cells by steps which are well known in the art. MEM switch


1


may then be fabricated on the processed substrate as described above with regard to FIGS.


2


and


7


-


10


to form a completely integrated device. These devices, when used in an array, may also be selectively actuated by directing light at individual photovoltaic devices, such as through an optical fiber mounted above each photovoltaic device.




Alternative Embodiments




It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing description is merely exemplary, and that an unlimited number of variations may be employed. In particular, the actuation (closing) voltage and dropout (opening) voltage of the MEM switch will depend upon the armature layer construction, the electrostatic plate sizes, the cantilever material, thickness, length and width, and the spacing between armature and substrate, to mention only a few variables, and thus the actuation voltage will vary widely between embodiments. The substrate photoresistor R


p


can be varied widely as well. This can be accomplished, for example, by changing the number of illuminated squares of substrate between the armature substrate pad connection and the substrate electrostatic pad connection, by varying impurities to alter the photoresistive effect, and by varying the intensity of the illumination. Moreover, alternative substrates are expected to provide an analogous photoresistive effect, or a different photoresistive material can be disposed on any substrate to provide the photoresistive effect. An unlimited number of different techniques and materials are available to provide a bias resistor R


b


of an appropriate value; in addition to the many possible variations of the presently preferred technique of applying a separate material patterned to form a resistor, many substrates can be made into high resistance traces through patterned implantation of impurities. The selected bias resistor R


b


, along with the selected photoresistor R


p


, causes the voltage available between the armature and substrate electrostatic plates to vary from above the actuation voltage to below the dropout voltage upon illumination of R


p


with a selected light source. Since all of these factors may be varied over a wide range, the invention is defined only by the accompanying claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of making an optically controlled mechanical switch, the method comprising the steps of:(a) forming substrate; (b) forming a armature having a first portion thereof fixed to said substrate and having a second portion which is moveable relative to the substrate in response to an application of electrostatic forces; (c) forming a switch which opens and closes in response to movement of the second portion of the armature; and (d) disposing a circuit for creating the electrostatic forces for opening and closing the switch on said substrate, the circuit including a photoelectric element for controlling the opening and closing of the switch in response to illumination of the switch.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the substrate is a semi-insulating substrate, the substrate exhibiting a change in resistance in response to illumination.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the substrate is selected from the group consisting of GaAs, InP and Si.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 where the photoelectric element includes a plurality of individual, series-connected photovoltaic cells.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the photoelectric element is a photovoltaic device which is mounted with the switch in a hybrid arrangement.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the photoelectric element is a photovoltaic device formed in said substrate.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein step of disposing a circuit on the substrate includes forming an electrostatic plate on said substrate and connecting the photovoltaic between the electrostatic plate on the substrate and an armature of said switch.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 further including forming pads on said substrate for connection of said photoelectric element thereto.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the photoelectric element is a photoresistor and wherein the step of disposing a circuit on the substrate includes forming the photoresistor in said substrate and forming pads on the substrate for connecting an external bias circuit to the circuit of recreating the electrostatic forces for opening and closing the switch.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein step of disposing a circuit on the substrate includes forming an electrostatic plate on said substrate and connecting the photoresistor between the electrostatic plate on the substrate and an armature of said switch.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a division of Application Ser. No. 09/978,314 filed on Oct. 15, 2001, which is a divisional application of Ser. No. 09/429,234, filing date Oct. 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,310,339 B1 issued on Oct. 30, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
4160141 Graf Jul 1979 A
4922253 Nathanson et al. May 1990 A
5121089 Larson Jun 1992 A
5541614 Lam et al. Jul 1996 A
6075239 Aksyuk et al. Jun 2000 A
6219472 Horino et al. Apr 2001 B1
6310339 Hsu et al. Oct 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0 484 142 May 1992 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Larson, Lawrence, et al, “Microactuators for GaAs-based Microwave Integrated Circuits,” IEEE, pp. 743-746 (1991). month unknown.