The subject matter disclosed herein relates to phase contrast imaging systems and methods.
An embodiment of the methods and apparatuses disclosed in this patent application includes an exemplary helical CT scan system that may be implemented in a slot scanning PCI configuration. The PCI system may be set to operate in a detuned mode wherein a horizontal moiré pattern (relative to a vertical orientation of the system's grating bars) may be modulated in the plane of the detector. The PCI scan of the object would take advantage of a non-phase-stepping technique, e.g., continuous motion, whereby the gratings' relative positions in the PCI system 100 would be fixed and the object would be continuously moved across the moiré fringes, or the object would be fixed and the moiré fringes would be continuously moved across the object. In one embodiment, this system allows moving the object in a helical CT fashion, i.e., a simultaneous linear translation across the moiré fringes and a rotation (
In one current embodiment, a grating based DPCI technology may be utilized. One schematic of a three-grating DPCI system is shown in
A grating based differential phase contrast imaging (DPCI) apparatus and acquisition technique is disclosed whereby the system generates horizontal moiré fringes on a detector of the DPCI system by tilting at least one of the G1 and G2 gratings, and capturing images of an object including moving the object in a direction perpendicular to the lines of the moiré fringes.
The grating based DPCI apparatus and acquisition technique may also be used for producing a helical computed tomography (CT) scan. A helical CT scan can be invoked when a DPCI system is set to produce a non-zero frequency moiré pattern. The relative displacement of the scanned object and moiré pattern may be used to acquire a continuous motion scan. The DPCI system that employs such an acquisition technique can be implemented in both large field of view (FOV) and slot scanning configurations.
In one embodiment, a method includes providing a DPCI system having an x-ray source, a G1 grating, a G2 grating, and a digital detector. Horizontal moiré fringes are generated on the detector by tilting at least one of the G1 and G2 gratings of the system relative to each other prior to capturing images of an object placed in the system.
In one embodiment, a method includes providing a DPCI system having an x-ray source, a G1 grating, a G2 grating, and a digital detector. Moiré fringes are generated on the detector on the detector, including tilting the G1 grating prior to capturing images of an object placed in the system.
In one embodiment, a method includes providing a DPCI system having an x-ray source, a G1 grating, a G2 grating, and a digital detector. Moiré fringes are generated on the detector, including tilting the G2 grating toward the detector, and not tilting the G1 grating, prior to capturing images of an object placed in the system.
In one embodiment, a method includes providing a DPCI system having an x-ray source, a G1 grating, a G2 grating, and a digital detector. Moiré fringes are generated on the detector, including tilting the G1 grating toward the detector, and not tilting the G2 grating, prior to capturing images of an object placed in the system.
In one embodiment, a method includes providing a DPCI system having an x-ray source, a G1 grating, a G2 grating, and a digital detector. Moiré fringes are generated on the detector, including tilting the G1 grating away from the detector, and not tilting the G2 grating, prior to capturing images of an object placed in the system.
In one embodiment, a method includes providing a DPCI system having an x-ray source, a G1 grating, a G2 grating, and a digital detector. Moiré fringes are generated on the detector, including tilting the G2 grating away from the detector, and not tilting the G1 grating, prior to capturing images of an object placed in the system.
So that the manner in which the features of the invention can be understood, a detailed description of the invention may be had by reference to certain embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only certain embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the scope of the invention encompasses other equally effective embodiments. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis generally being placed upon illustrating the features of certain embodiments of the invention. In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like parts throughout the various views. Thus, for further understanding of the invention, reference can be made to the following detailed description, read in connection with the drawings in which:
The methods and apparatuses disclosed herein include exemplary differential phase contrast imaging systems which, in one or more embodiments, may be implemented in a slot scanning configuration. The exemplary phase contrast imaging systems may also be set to operate in a detuned mode wherein a horizontal moiré pattern, which is perpendicular to an orientation of the grating bars, may be modulated in the plane of the detector. The object scan would take advantage of a non-phase-stepping technique whereby the gratings' positions would be fixed and the object to be scanned would be moved across (perpendicular to) the moiré fringes during a scan, or whereby the object is fixed and the moiré fringes are moved across the scanned object. This configuration may allow moving the object in a helical CT fashion, i.e., simultaneous linear translation and rotation. In addition, tipping or tilting of the grating may be performed for the purpose of: i) decreasing a fraction of the incoherent radiation passed through the grating bars and ii) tuning the PCI system to higher x-ray energies.
In one embodiment a grating based differential phase contrast imaging (DPCI) technology may be used. In particular, a two-grating or three-grating DPCI system may be invoked. The schematic of a three-grating DPCI system 100 is shown in
To implement a continuous motion of the relatively fixed G1 and G2 gratings, such as using a swing arm as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,001,967, identified above, the PCI system may be detuned by a predetermined magnitude. In one detuned embodiment, a DPCI system generates a non-zero frequency moiré pattern in the plane of detector, which is immediately adjacent to the absorption grating G2 as shown in
ID=MTF(f′)[cos(2πfx)·cos(2πgx)]=MTF(f′)[cos(2π(f+g)x)+cos(2π(f−g)x)]/2 (1)
Here f=1/pint and g=1/p2 are the frequencies of the interference pattern (pint) and G2 grating (p2), respectively. MTF is a modulation transfer function and x is a dimension specified in
Here, fx=cos(θ)/d and fy=sin(θ)/d are the interference pattern frequencies in the x and y direction, respectively, and gx,y are the frequencies of G2, see
With the tilt present in the DPCI system the moiré pattern modulated by G2 onto detector D would have frequency f′ and angle α relative to a vertical y-axis.
α=tan−1((fy−gy)/(fx−gx)) (3)
As described earlier (in the rationale of equation (1)), the DPCI system with perfect frequency match (fx=gx) and gratings alignment (θ=0°) would produce a zero moiré frequency pattern (
The formation of an interference pattern is schematically shown in
As shown in
In one embodiment, CT motion can be realized by a step and repeat sequence. Namely, the step and repeat procedure may be realized in the following way: 1) the object and moiré fringe are linearly displaced relative to each other by fixing one or the other and moving the remaining one; 2) the object, or moiré fringe, whichever is moved, is then returned to its initial position, and then 3) the object is rotated a predetermined amount and the steps are repeated until a whole CT scan is performed. One shortcoming here may be that the object rotation is performed around the axis parallel to the direction of the fringe pattern, and the proper acquisition requires the relative object-fringe displacement to be perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Such step and repeat CT acquisition may not be optimal.
In one embodiment, a potential CT imaging procedure may include object rotation without relative object-fringe linear displacement. Although it may be feasible, primarily in the case of small angle rotation of the object significantly larger than the period of moiré fringe, the rotation of the object may create a distorted projection onto the moiré fringes as it would do during the linear object-fringe displacement only. A possible shortcoming of this geometry is that it may become impractical for a simultaneous slot scanning CT implementation. In one embodiment, the mechanism could include a multi-pass slot scanning CT, where the slot DPCI assembly passes across the object (perpendicular to grating bars), thereby creating one projection for a whole object and then pass again across the object after it's rotated by a desired angle. Such multiple passes may be performed until a desired number of object rotations is completed.
Thus, one embodiment, which may provide an alternative to the step-and-repeat type of motion disclosed herein, may include:
1) Creating a moiré pattern with horizontally oriented fringes, by relative tilting between G1 and G2 gratings.
2) Moving the object across the horizontal fringe lines. This motion may be described as two independent motions: i) linear displacement to cover one period of moiré fringes and ii) rotation around the object's axis of CT rotation. The linear displacement and rotational motions may be performed simultaneously, which makes it equivalent to a helical CT scan.
If we assume, from
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method, or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.), or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “circuitry,” “module,” and/or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Program code and/or executable instructions embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer (device), partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 62/257,277, filed Nov. 19, 2015, in the name of Baturin, and entitled DETUNED PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING HELICAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER. This application is related in certain respects to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/874,748, filed Oct. 5, 2015, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled MATERIAL DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUE USING X-RAY PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING SYSTEM; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/621,823, filed Feb. 13, 2015, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FABRICATION AND TUNING OF GRATING-BASED DIFFERENTIAL PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING SYSTEM; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/143,183, filed Dec. 30, 2013, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled PHASE RETRIEVAL FROM DIFFERENTIAL PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING; U.S. Pat. No. 9,494,534, issued Nov. 15, 2016, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled MATERIAL DIFFERENTIATION WITH PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/517,072, filed Oct. 17, 2014, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled SURROGATE PHANTOM FOR DIFFERENTIAL PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING; U.S. Pat. No. 9,357,975, issued Jun. 7, 2016, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled LARGE FOV PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING BASED ON DETUNED CONFIGURATION INCLUDING ACQUISITION AND RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES; U.S. Pat. No. 8,855,395, issued Oct. 7, 2014, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled CONDITIONAL LIKELIHOOD MATERIAL DECOMPOSITION AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME; U.S. Pat. No. 9,001,967, issued Apr. 7, 2015, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled SPECTRAL GRATING-BASED DIFFERENTIAL PHASE CONTRAST SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/724,096, filed Dec. 21, 2012, in the name of Baturin et al., and entitled GRATING-BASED DIFFERENTIAL PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING SYSTEM WITH ADJUSTABLE CAPTURE TECHNIQUE FOR MEDICAL RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/724,037, filed Dec. 21, 2012, in the name of Yip et al., and entitled HYBRID SLOT-SCANNING GRATING-BASED DIFFERENTIAL PHASE CONTRAST IMAGING SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING; all ten of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5812629 | Clauser | Sep 1998 | A |
6560309 | Becker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
7346204 | Ito | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7453981 | Baumann et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7639786 | Baumann et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646843 | Popescu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693256 | Brahme et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7817777 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8280000 | Takahashi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8515002 | Huang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8855395 | Baturin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9001867 | Baturin et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9001967 | Baturin et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9357975 | Baturin et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9494534 | Baturin et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9700267 | Baturin et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9724063 | Baturin et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9795350 | Baturin et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9907524 | Baturin et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10058300 | Baturin et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10096098 | Baturin et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20050249328 | Bruder et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070183560 | Popescu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183582 | Baumann et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183583 | Baumann et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080009717 | Herrmann et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014643 | Bjorkholm | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080075228 | Tasaki | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080123805 | Zellerhoff | May 2008 | A1 |
20080273653 | Niwa et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090092227 | David et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090097730 | Kasai et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116720 | Ritman | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128830 | Kottler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100220832 | Ning et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100220834 | Heismann et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246764 | Itoh et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246765 | Murakoshi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272230 | Koehler | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272235 | Takahashi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110085639 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135057 | Mori et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110206181 | Linev | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110243302 | Murakoshi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110243305 | Tada | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120020461 | Roessl et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120045108 | Shechter | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057677 | Vogtmeier et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120093284 | Takemoto et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120114098 | Mikami et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120163554 | Tada | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120250972 | Tada | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130010926 | Tada | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130028378 | Stutman et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034209 | Ouchi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130108015 | Kottler et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130156284 | Koehler et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130259194 | Yip et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130308750 | Ishii | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140044234 | Hashimoto et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140177789 | Baturin et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185746 | Baturin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140185896 | Baturin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140226782 | Stutman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226783 | Ning et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226785 | Stutman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140270060 | Date et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270061 | Yamaguchi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286477 | Ishii et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140341347 | Radicke | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140355740 | Koehiler et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150092916 | Baturin et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150110247 | Baturin et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117599 | Yun et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150131777 | Makifuchi et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150182178 | Baturin et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150187096 | Baturin et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150216499 | Martens et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160038107 | Baturin et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160095562 | Baturin et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125599 | Stampanoni et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160242714 | Baturin et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160317109 | Yip et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170035378 | Baturin et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170082559 | Arboleda | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170146467 | Baturin | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101011256 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101036582 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101257851 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101952900 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102197303 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102325498 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102639059 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102740775 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102802529 | Nov 2012 | CN |
104132953 | Nov 2014 | CN |
104244832 | Dec 2014 | CN |
102006015356 | Aug 2007 | DE |
1731099 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2007-203074 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2009-150875 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2011-504395 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011-078669 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2012-090945 | May 2012 | JP |
2012-125343 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2013-138836 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2013-536723 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2013-255536 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2012-005820 | Apr 2014 | JP |
2015-519091 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2016-501630 | Jan 2016 | JP |
201424695 | Jul 2014 | TW |
2011122715 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012029048 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012080125 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013126296 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013148010 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013187150 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014100063 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014137318 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015102756 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015102757 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2017087586 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, International application No. PCT/US2016/062389, dated Feb. 2, 2017, 2 pages. |
Jian Fu et al., Helical differential X-Ray phase-contrast computed tomography, Physica Medica, vol. 30, pp. 374-379, 2014. |
Thomas Thuring, et al., Non-linear regularized phase retrieval for unidirectional X-ray differential phase contrast radiography, Optics Express, vol. 19, Issue 25, pp. 25545-25558, Optical Society of America 2011, issn: 10944087. |
Supplementary European Search Report, dated Nov. 27, 2015, European Application No. 13769560.7, 2 pages. |
H.N. Cardinal and A. Fenster “An accurate method for direct dual-energy calibration and decomposition” Medical Physics, 1990, May-Jun. vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 327-341. |
Chapman, D., Thomlinson, et al., “Diffraction enhanced x-ray imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol., 42, 2015, (1997). |
Bonse, et al., “An x-ray interferometer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 6(8), 155-156, (1965). |
Ingal. V. N., et al., “X-ray plane-wave topography observation of the phase contrast from noncrystalline object,” J. PhD 28(11), 2314-2317, (1995). |
Wilkins, S. W., et al., “Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X-rays,” Nature (London) 384(6607) 335-338, (1996). |
Momose, A., et al., “Demonstration of X-ray Talbot interferometry,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42, L866-L868, (2003). |
Wietkamp, T., et al., “X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer,” Opt. Exp. 13(16), 6296-6304, (2006). |
Pfeiffer, F., “Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources”, Nature Phys. 2, 258-261, (2006). |
International Search Report, International application No. PCT/US2014/066027, dated May 2, 2015, 2 pages. |
International Search Report, International application No. PCT/US2014/066033, dated Apr. 28, 2015, 2 pages. |
International Search Report, International application No. PCT/US2013/026301, dated Jun. 3, 2013, 3 pages. |
International Search Report, International application No. PCT/US2013/075898, dated Apr. 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
Thomas Thuring, Compact X-ray grating interferometry for phase and dark-field computed tomography in the diagnostic energy range, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 2013, pp. 1-180. |
C. Kottler et al., Grating interferometer based scanning setup for hardy-ray phase contrast imaging, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, 034710, 2007, pp. 1-4. |
Christian Kottler et al., “Dual energy phase contrast x-ray with Talbot-Lau interferometer,” Journal of Applied Physics, 2010, 108, pp. 114906-1-114906-6. |
Commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 61/939,925, entitled: Method and Apparatus for Fabrication and Tuning of Grating-Based Differential Phase Contrast Imaging System filed Feb. 14, 2014, by Baturin et al. |
Commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,183, entitled: Phase Retrieval From Differential Phase Contrast Imaging filed Dec. 30, 2013, by Baturin et al. |
Commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 61/892,490, entitled: Surrogate Phantom for Differential Phase Contrast Imaging filed Oct. 18, 2013, by Baturin et al. |
Commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,254, entitled: Large FOV Phase Contrast Imaging Based on Detuned Configuration Including Acquisition and Reconstruction Techniques filed Dec. 30, 2013, by Baturin et al. |
Chinese Search Report, dated Mar. 30, 2017, Chinese Application No. 201380067294.3 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170146467 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62257277 | Nov 2015 | US |