The present disclosure is related to optical sensors, particularly to sensors for detecting X-rays.
X-ray sensors are used in a wide variety of applications including medical, security and industrial imaging. In particular, in medical applications such as mammography, chest radiology, angiography, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography X-ray imaging offer several advantages over other types of imaging. Digital flat-panel X-ray detectors make it possible to view combine X-ray and magnetic resonance images (MRI) to more accurately guide medical diagnosis and intervention. In many applications, shadow imaging is used when imaging an X-ray image of an object due to a lack of practical means to focus X-rays. Shadow images are typically larger than the object being imaged, and therefore, in many applications, it is desirable to have large flat panel X-ray image sensors. Conventional flat panel X-ray imagers include direct conversion imagers and indirect conversion imagers. In indirect conversion imagers X-rays are first converted to optical wavelengths e.g., via a scintillating phosphor such as CsI:Tl, and the optical wavelengths emitted from the scintillating phosphor represent the signal, which is detected by an array of photodiodes. Direct conversion imagers use an X-ray photoconductor as a detecting element to convert the absorbed X-ray photons directly to collectable charge carriers which represent the signal.
Several X-ray photoconductors have been explored for potential use in commercial applications. Most of these X-ray photoconductors, however, suffer from drawbacks such as high dark currents, or insufficient charge collection efficiency. Moreover, technological problems in manufacturing uniform and homogenous layers of photoconductors over a large area exist.
In an embodiment according to the present disclosure, an X-ray photodetector device is described.
In an embodiment according to the present disclosure, a device for detecting X-rays may include a substrate having a plurality of pixels thereon. Each of the pixels may include a first electrode, and a second electrode electrically connected with the first electrode via an insulating photon absorbing material having an attenuation depth of less than about 8 μm for photons having an energy of about 5 keV. A portion of the insulating photon absorbing material forms a vertical microstructure.
In an embodiment according to the present disclosure, a method for detecting X-rays may include obtaining a device including a substrate having a plurality of pixels thereon, exposing the device to X-ray photons, and processing an electrical signal resulting from the X-ray photons impinging on the device. Each of the pixels of the device include a first electrode, a second electrode electrically connected with the first electrode via an insulating photon absorbing material having an attenuation depth of less than about 8 μm for photons having an energy of about 5 keV. A portion of the insulating photon absorbing material comprises a vertical microstructure.
In an embodiment according to the present disclosure, a method for making an X-ray imaging device may include obtaining a first X-ray detector device and a second X-ray detector device, and bonding a top side of the first X-ray detector device with a bottom side of the second X-ray detector device such that a vertical microstructure of the first X-ray detector device and a vertical microstructure of the second X-ray detector device extend away from each other. The first and the second X-ray detector devices each include a substrate having a plurality of pixels thereon. Each of the pixels include a first electrode, and a second electrode electrically connected with the first electrode via an insulating photon absorbing material having an attenuation depth of less than about 8 μm for photons having an energy of about 5 keV. A portion of the comprises insulating photon absorbing material a vertical microstructure; and
In an embodiment according to the present disclosure, a system for real-time tomography is described. The system may include an X-ray source for projecting X-rays through a screening area, a conveyor configured to direct an object to be screened to pass through the scanning area, an X-ray detector configured to detect X-rays transmitted through an object present in the scanning area, and an electronic display configured to display an image of the screened object, the image being constructed based on signals received by the X-ray detector. The X-ray detector may include a substrate having a plurality of pixels thereon. Each of the pixels may include a first electrode, and a second electrode electrically connected with the first electrode via an insulating photon absorbing material having an attenuation depth of less than about 8 μm for photons having an energy of about 5 keV. A portion of the insulating photon absorbing material forms a vertical microstructure.
In an embodiment according to the present disclosure, a system for medical imaging is described. The system may include an X-ray source for projecting X-rays through an examination region, an X-ray detector configured to detect X-rays transmitted through a subject present in the examination region, and an electronic display configured to display an image constructed from signals received by the X-ray detector. The X-ray detector may include a substrate having a plurality of pixels thereon. Each of the pixels may include a first electrode, and a second electrode electrically connected with the first electrode via an insulating photon absorbing material having an attenuation depth of less than about 8 μm for photons having an energy of about 5 keV. A portion of the insulating photon absorbing material forms a vertical microstructure.
As used in this document, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Nothing in this disclosure is to be construed as an admission that the embodiments described in this disclosure are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention. As used in this document, the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to.”
This disclosure is not limited to the particular systems, devices and methods described, as these may vary. The terminology used in the description is for the purpose of describing the particular versions or embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope.
In the present disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. Various embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are illustrative and not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be used, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented herein. It will be understood that the aspects of the present disclosure, as generally described herein, and illustrated in the Figures, can be arranged, substituted, combined, separated, and designed in a wide variety of different configurations, all of which are contemplated herein.
The active matrix array may be coated by a suitable X-ray photoconductor material, such as, for example, stabilized amorphous selenium (a-Se). Other examples of X-ray photoconductor material include insulators with heavy elements such as, for example, mercury iodide (HgI2), cadmium zinc telluride (Cd0.95Zn0.05Te), lead iodide (PbI2), lead oxide (PbO), thallium bromide (TlBr), and the like or any combinations thereof. An electrode may be provided on a surface of the X-ray photoconductor material to allow the application of a bias voltage as illustrated in
When incident X-ray is absorbed in a photoconductor medium, as a result of the photoelectric effect, an energetic primary electron is knocked out from an inner core shell, for example the K-shell. The primary electron has a large kinetic energy given by (Eph−Ebinding), where Eph is the X-ray photon energy and Ebinding is the binding energy of the electron in the shell from which it was knocked out. The energetic primary electron is ejected in a direction not necessarily collinear with impinging X-ray photon and as it travels in the medium, it interacts with and transfers energy to the medium. This may result, depending on the energy of the impinging X-ray photon, in generation of many electron hole pairs, as well as phonons. Phonons essentially represent losses. The electron and hole pairs may be collected under appropriate conditions (e.g., providing a suitable bias across the photoconductor material, as depicted in
As shown in the embodiment illustrated in
In the example illustrated in
Depending on particular applications of FPXIs different photoconductor may be suitable. Table 1 summarizes some of the properties of various X-ray photoconductors that may be used in FPXIs for various applications.
In clinical applications, it is desirable that nearly all the incident X-ray radiation be absorbed within a practical photoconductor thickness to avoid unnecessary patient exposure. Thus, for clinical applications, it is desirable that the linear attenuation coefficient α be sufficiently large to allow the incident photons (within the energy range of interest) to be attenuated inside the photoconductor. Put differently, the X-ray attenuation depth δ, which is the reciprocal of α must be substantially less than the photoconductor layer thickness L (i.e., δ<<L). The fraction of incident photons in the beam that are attenuated by the photoconductor depends on the linear attenuation coefficient α of the photoconductor material and its thickness L; and is given by
AQ=Attenuated fraction=[1−exp(−αL)] Equation (1)
where α=a (Eph,Z,ρ) is a function of photon energy Eph, atomic number Z and density p of the material. AQ is also called the “quantum efficiency” (QE) because it describes the efficiency with which the medium attenuates photons. The attenuation depth δ is where the beam has been attenuated by 63%.
Due to the exponential nature of absorption in Equation (1) a doubling of L can only result in a further 63% attenuation of the remaining beam for a total attenuation of 63+37×0.63≈86%. For example, a-Se has an attenuation depth of 49 μm at 20 keV (within the mammographic range). Thus, for an a-Se layer with a nominal thickness of about 200 μm, AQ is about 98.3%. At higher energies, for example at 60 keV, S for a-Se is about 998 μm. For an a-Se layer of thickness 1,000 μm, therefore, AQ is only 63.2%. Theoretically, increasing the thickness would increase AQ. Practically, however, since the required bias voltage increases with increasing thickness, designing sensors using thicker a-Se layers may not be feasible. As can be seen in Table 1, photoconductors with higher-Z components such as PbO, PbI2, HgI2, CdZnTe, which have very good quantum efficiencies in the high energy range (as used in, e.g., chest radiography and angiography) may be advantageous in applications using high energy X-rays.
Once the charges are generated by the absorption of X-rays, these charges can be collected by applying a field F shown in
One of skill in the art will appreciate that the inner shell electrons do not necessarily propagate along the initial direction of the impinging X-ray photons. As a result, the pixel collection area extends laterally and perpendicularly to the direction of the impinging X-ray photon and provides more opportunities for trapping of carriers laterally far away from the initial point of penetration of the X-ray photon.
The angular distribution of an ejected electron relative to the plane of polarization of the impinging X-ray photon for unpolarized light is described by
where the asymmetry parameter β ranges from 1 to 1.5 for 3d and 3p electrons (as can be seen in
This in turn implies that there is a minimum pixel size for planar geometry, dependent on X-ray energy, determined by the trace of the combined ejected high energy electrons (referred to as the “blur circle”), since each ejected electron traces its own volume (e.g., a sphere with a radius R). One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that an ideal X-ray detector would provide line of sight incident photon information that coincides with the point of impact of the X-ray photon with the detector. Any deviation from this in a real device would contribute to blurring of the information at best, or reducing the dynamic range of the detected image through fogging.
Another desirable aspect of a photoconductor suitable for FPXIs is high intrinsic X-ray sensitivity. In other words, a photoconductor that is able to generate as many collectable (free) electron hole pairs (EHPs) as possible per unit of absorbed radiation is more desirable. The amount of radiation energy required, denoted as W±, to create a single free electron and hole pair is referred to herein as “electron-hole pair creation energy” or the “ionization energy.” Thus, the free (or collectable) charge, ΔQ, generated from an incident and absorbed radiation of energy ΔE is eΔE/W±, where e is the elementary charge.
Yet another desirable aspect of a photoconductor is low “dark-current.” “Dark-current” refers to a signal output by a pixel when there is no X-ray radiation impinging on the pixel. In order for a material to have a low dark current, it is desirable that charge collection efficiency be sufficiently high for both electrons and holes.
In certain embodiments, a material with high intrinsic X-ray sensitivity may result in a high dark current if the applied electric field (which may be of the order of 10 V/μm) results in charge carriers at room temperature without exposure to X-ray photons. Such dark current may act as a source of noise in the FPXI, and it is, therefore, desirable to reduce the dark current. One way to reduce the dark current is through appropriate choice of the photoconductor material. Another way to reduce the dark current is by providing a p-like blocking layer to prevent injection of electrons from the negative electrode and an n-like blocking layer to prevent injection of holes from the positive electrode. It must be noted that as used herein, the terminology used to describe the n- and p-layers does not necessarily relate to the Fermi levels of these layers as in traditional semiconductor physics. Rather, the terminology is merely indicative of the relative charge carrier transport properties of the respective materials.
Depending on the particular material used for the n-like or the p-like blocking layers, the thickness of the respective layers may range from about 20 nm to about 8 μm. One of skill in the art will appreciate that the thickness of the blocking layers will also depend on factors such as, for example, the photoconductor material and thickness, energy of impinging X-ray photons, applied voltage bias, etc. Examples of hole-blocking (n-like) materials include, but are not limited to, cerium oxide (CeO2), titanium oxide (TiO2), perylene tetracarboxylic bisbenzimidazole (PTCBI), polyimide (PI), or other materials having poor hole transport characteristics. Examples of electron-blocking (p-like) materials include, but are not limited to, amorphous arsenic selenide (As2Se3), or other materials having poor electron transport characteristics.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that while the embodiment of
As depicted in
In various embodiments, pillar structure 250 may have any cross-sectional shape. For example, pillar structure 250 may have an elliptical, a circular, a convex polygonal or a mesh shaped cross-section. In some embodiments, pillar structure 250 may have a uniform or a non-uniform cross-sectional dimension. For example, in an embodiment, pillar structure 250 may be in the form of a cone or a pyramid tapering away from pixel electrode 210.
In the context of pillar structure having a square cross-section, for example, the pillar structure may have a side length of about 10 μm to about 100 μm and a height of about 100 μm to about 500 μm. Thus, a pillar structure with square cross-section may have a side length of about 10 μm, 11 μm, 12 μm, about 13 μm, about 14 μm, about 15 μm, 16 μm, about 17 μm, about 18 μm, about 19 μm, about 20 μm, about 25 μm, about 30 μm, about 35 μm, about 40 μm, about 45 μm, about 50 μm, about 60 μm, about 70 μm, about 80 μm, about 90 μm, about 100 μm, or any dimension between any two of these dimensions. Likewise, a pillar structure may have a height of about 100 μm, about 105 μm, about 110 μm, about 115 μm, about 120 μm, about 125 μm, about 150 μm, about 175 μm, about 200 μm, about 225 μm, about 250 μm, about 275 μm, about 300 μm, about 350 μm, about 400 μm, about 450 μm, about 500 μm, or any other height between any two of these heights. It is contemplated that within a flat-panel X-ray imager having multiple pixels (e.g., such as one depicted in
In various embodiments, pixel electrode 210 and top electrode 201 may be formed of a suitable metal such as, for example, Al, Au, Ag, Cu, Pt, and the like, or any combination thereof.
Any suitable structure known in the art may be used for TFT 240. For example, a standard amorphous silicon TFT may be used. Likewise, any suitable dielectric material 205 such as, for example, SiO2, Al2O3, MgNb2O6, ZnNb2O6, MgTa2O6, (ZnMg)TiO3, (ZrSn)TiO4, Ba2Ti9O20, TiO2, and the like or any combinations thereof may be used in capacitor 260. Suitable materials for substrate 220 may include, for example, glass, ITO coated glass, quartz, Al2O3, dielectric polymers, and the like, or any combinations thereof.
As has been described herein, within the constraints of signal-to-noise ratio S/N and dynamic range of FPXIs, the smallest pixel size can be designed by controlling the size of the blur circle by choosing an appropriate pillar dimension. The pillar geometry of individual pixels advantageously confines the lateral migration of the inner shell electrons inside the pillar resulting in less pixel cross talk, and reduces loss of free carriers (e.g., to recombination and trapping) and its attendant deleterious effects described elsewhere herein. Thus, for a pillar-structured pixel (e.g., pixel 200), the charge collection efficiency is higher than that of the planar pixel (e.g., as illustrated in
The pillar geometry illustrated in
Presence of center electrode 315, as depicted in
As discussed above, it may be desirable for the pillar structures to have a minimum width (e.g., diameter in the context of cylindrical pillars) so that most of the X-ray photons are absorbed within the photoconductor material of the pillar structures. On the other hand, a minimum separation between neighboring pixels is desirable to reduce cross-talk between pixels. Pixel size, and distance between neighboring pixels (also referred to herein as “pixel pitch”), therefore, has to be optimized depending on the particular application of an FPXI using the pillar structured pixels described herein. Factors such as, for example, image resolution, materials used, fabrication methods and technologies used, and so forth may, in various embodiments, determine the number and density of pixels used for a particular FPXI. It will be appreciated that in an FPXI using pixel 200 or pixel 300, the pixel number and pixel pitch may be chosen appropriately depending on the particular application.
Depending on the incident X-ray flux, it may be desirable, in some embodiments, to have a significantly high pixel density in order to capture majority of X-rays. Alternatively, in some embodiments, a very high image resolution may be desirable (e.g., in medical applications). In such embodiments, pixel density may be increased by inverted stacking of the pillar structured pixels in staggered configuration. Such a configuration may increase pixel density without adversely affecting pixel cross-talk.
In a double-sided configuration, the X-ray photons that pass through the gaps between the pillars of the first array necessarily pass through the pillars of the second array Thus, advantageously, the double-sided configuration (e.g., as depicted in
Additionally, as depicted in
In various embodiments, the pitch and pillar size for the second array may be different from the pitch and pillar size for the first array.
It is contemplated that depending on particular applications, the pitch and pillar size of pixels within an FPXI pixel array of various embodiments disclosed herein may be varied so as to capture X-ray photons of various energies. For example, a single FPXI may have pillars having a height of 10 μm, 20 μm, 50 μm, 100 μm, and 500 μm, and a width of 5 μm, 10 μm, 25 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm respectively, on a first side of the substrate and pillars having a height of 25 μm, 75 μm, 150 μm, 250 μm, and 300 μm, and a width of 10 μm, 25 μm, 50 μm, 100 μm, and 150 μm respectively on a second side of the substrate. The pitch for the pillars on the first side may be, for example, 20 μm, 40 μm, 100 μm, 200 μm, and 1000 μm respectively. The pitch for the pillars on the second side may be, for example, 20 μm, 50 μm, 100 μm, 200 μm, and 300 μm respectively. It will be appreciated that the dimensions provided herein are merely illustrative and not limiting. Other dimensions are contemplated. One skilled in the art will appreciate that while an example of a double-sided configuration is described above, similar variation in heights of pillars and pitch for the pillars may be provided in the one-sided arrays of embodiments illustrated in
Embodiments of the devices and systems described herein may be used for any suitable application where detecting X-rays is required. For example, the devices and systems described herein may be used in X-ray telescopes, X-ray spectroscope, X-ray lithography systems, medical imaging systems such as, for example, X-ray computed tomography, baggage screening systems, systems for defect detection on assembly lines, and so forth. Embodiments illustrating the methods and materials used may be further understood by reference to the following non-limiting examples:
In the embodiment depicted in
FPXI 900 depicted in
The minimum thickness of HgI2 prevents shorting of the top and bottom electrodes once a voltage bias is applied across the pillar array. It is desirable that the minimum thickness be at least equal to the attenuation depth of the X-rays in HgI2 so that X-rays not passing through the pillars have a low probability of escaping FPXI 900 unabsorbed. One of skill in the art will appreciate that the minimum thickness is determined by the material properties of the photoconductor material (e.g., HgI2 in the embodiment depicted in
Advantageously, in the embodiment depicted in
In the embodiment depicted in
FPXI 1000 depicted in
The minimum thickness of PbI2 prevents shorting of the top and bottom electrodes once a voltage bias is applied across the pillar array. It is desirable that the minimum thickness be at least equal to the attenuation depth of the X-rays in PbI2 so that X-rays not passing through the pillars have a low probability of escaping FPXI 1000 unabsorbed. One of skill in the art will appreciate that the minimum thickness is determined by the material properties of the photoconductor material (e.g., PbI2 in this example) and energy of the incident X-rays used in the particular application.
In the array depicted in
To fabricate the double sided configuration, two FPXIs 900 are fabricated and glued or bonded back-to-back with an appropriate offset. The length by which the FPXIs 900 are offset may be chosen to be just sufficient to ensure that substantially all incoming X-ray photons travel through a thickness of the photoconductor material that is at a minimum as thick as a single sided layer thickness. With such a design, substantially all of the X-ray photons that escape absorption in the top array (i.e., array 1150A) will now be detected in the bottom array (i.e., 1150B).
Another method of fabrication would be to fabricate the TFT circuits on both sides of the substrate with the appropriate registration and subsequently deposit the amorphous selenium and blocking layers.
System 1200 may be used for imaging objects present in the scanning area. Examples of objects that may be screened using system 1200 include, but are not limited to, items of luggage (e.g., at an airport), manufactured objects (e.g., for quality control screening for imaging defects), etc.
The “subject” as used herein includes, but is not limited to, humans and non-human vertebrates such as wild, domestic and farm animals. System 1300 may be used for imaging subjects to obtain, for example, dental X-ray images, mammograms, orthopedic X-ray images, chest X-ray images and so forth.
The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes by the use of diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples. Insofar as such diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those within the art that each function and/or operation within such diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof.
The subject matter herein described sometimes illustrates different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermediate components.
As used herein, the term “about” means that the numerical value is approximate and small variations would not significantly affect the practice of the disclosed embodiments. Where a numerical limitation is used, unless indicated otherwise by the context, “about” means the numerical value can vary by up to ±10% and remain within the scope of the disclosed embodiments.
With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
As will be understood by one skilled in the art, for any and all purposes, such as in terms of providing a written description, all ranges disclosed herein also encompass any and all possible subranges and a combination of subranges thereof. Any listed range can be easily recognized as sufficiently describing and enabling the same range being broken down into at least equal halves, thirds, quarters, fifths, tenths, etc. As will also be understood by one skilled in the art, a range includes each individual member. Thus, for example, a group having 1-3 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, or 3 cells. Similarly, a group having 1-5 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 cells, and so forth.
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
The disclosures of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/204,686, filed Sep. 4, 2008 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,646,943), Ser. No. 12/648,942, filed Dec. 29, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,229,255), Ser. No. 13/556,041, filed Jul. 23, 2012, Ser. No. 12/270,233, filed Nov. 13, 2008 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,274,039), Ser. No. 13/925,429, filed Jun. 24, 2013, Ser. No. 13/570,027, filed Aug. 8, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,471,190), Ser. No. 12/472,264, filed May 26, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,269,985, Ser. No. 13/621,607, filed Sep. 17, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,514,411), Ser. No. 13/971,523, filed Aug. 20, 2013 (now allowed), Ser. No. 12/472,271, filed May 26, 2009 (now abandoned), Ser. No. 12/478,598, filed Jun. 4, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,546,742), Ser. No. 14/021,672, filed Sep. 9, 2013, Ser. No. 12/573,582, filed Oct. 5, 2009 (now allowed), Ser. No. 14/274,448, filed May 9, 2014, Ser. No. 12/575,221, filed Oct. 7, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,384,007), Ser. No. 12/633,323, filed Dec. 8, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,735,797), Ser. No. 14/068,864, filed Oct. 31, 2013, Ser. No. 14/281,108, filed May 19, 2014, Ser. No. 13/494,661, filed Jun. 12, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,754,359), Ser. No. 12/633,318, filed Dec. 8, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,519,379), Ser. No. 13/975,553, filed Aug. 26, 2013 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,488), Ser. No. 12/633,313, filed Dec. 8, 2009, Ser. No. 12/633,305, filed Dec. 8, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,299,472), Ser. No. 13/543,556, filed Jul. 6, 2012 (now allowed), Ser. No. 12/621,497, filed Nov. 19, 2009 (now abandoned), Ser. No. 12/633,297, filed Dec. 8, 2009, Ser. No. 12/982,269, filed Dec. 30, 2010, Ser. No. 12/966,573, filed Dec. 13, 2010, Ser. No. 12/967,880, filed Dec. 14, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,748,799), Ser. No. 12/966,514, filed Dec. 13, 2010, Ser. No. 12/974,499, filed Dec. 21, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,507,840), Ser. No. 12/966,535, filed Dec. 13, 2010, Ser. No. 12/910,664, filed Oct. 22, 2010, Ser. No. 12/945,492, filed Nov. 12, 2010, Ser. No. 13/047,392, filed Mar. 14, 2011 (now allowed), Ser. No. 13/048,635, filed Mar. 15, 2011 (now allowed), Ser. No. 13/106,851, filed May 12, 2011, Ser. No. 13/288,131, filed Nov. 3, 2011, Ser. No. 14/032,166, filed Sep. 19, 2013, Ser. No. 13/543,307, filed Jul. 6, 2012, Ser. No. 13/963,847, filed Aug. 9, 2013, Ser. No. 13/693,207, filed Dec. 4, 2012, 61/869,727, filed Aug. 25, 2013, Ser. No. 14/322,503, filed Jul. 2, 2014, and Ser. No. 14/311,954, filed Jun. 23, 2014, are each hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.