Embodiments described herein generally relate to semiconductor device manufacturing, and more particularly, to chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) systems used in semiconductor device manufacturing and substrate processing methods related thereto.
Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is commonly used in the manufacturing of high-density integrated circuits to planarize or polish a layer of material deposited on a substrate. One common application of a CMP process in semiconductor device manufacturing is planarization of a bulk film, for example pre-metal dielectric (PMD) or interlayer dielectric (ILD) polishing, where underlying two or three-dimensional features create recesses and protrusions in the surface of the to be planarized material surface. Other common applications include shallow trench isolation (STI) and interlayer metal interconnect formation, where the CMP process is used to remove the via, contact or trench fill material (overburden) from the exposed surface (field) of the layer of material having the STI or metal interconnect features disposed therein.
In a typical CMP process, a polishing pad is mounted to a rotatable polishing platen. A material surface of a substrate is urged against the polishing pad in the presence of a polishing fluid. Typically, the polishing fluid is an aqueous solution of one or more chemically active components and abrasive particles suspended in the aqueous solution, e.g., a CMP slurry. The material surface of the substrate is urged against the polishing pad using a substrate carrier. A typical substrate carrier includes a membrane, bladder, or a backing plate disposed against a backside surface of the substrate and an annular retaining ring circumscribing the substrate. The membrane, bladder, or backing plate is used to apply a downforce against the substrate while the substrate carrier rotates about a carrier axis. The retaining ring surrounds the substrate as the substrate is urged against the polishing pad and is used to prevent the substrate from slipping from the substrate carrier. Material is removed across the surface of the substrate in contact with the polishing pad through a combination of chemical and mechanical activity which is provided by the polishing fluid, the relative motion of the substrate and the polishing pad, and the downforce exerted on the substrate against the polishing pad.
Generally, CMP process performance is characterized with reference to a material removal rate from the surface of the substrate and the uniformity of the material removal rate (removal rate uniformity) across the surface of the substrate. In a dielectric bulk film planarization process, non-uniform material removal rate across the surface of the substrate can lead to poor planarity and/or undesirable thickness variation of the dielectric material remaining post CMP. In a metal interconnect CMP application, metal loss resulting from poor local planarization and/or non-uniform material removal rate can cause undesirable variation in the effective resistance of the metal features, thus affecting device performance and reliability. Thus, non-uniform material removal rate across the surface of a substrate can adversely affect device performance and/or cause device failure which results in suppressed yield of usable devices formed on the substrate.
Often, non-uniform material removal rate is more pronounced in surface regions that are proximate to the peripheral edge of the substrate, e.g., within 6 mm of the peripheral edge of a 300 mm diameter substrate, when compared to the average of material removal rates calculated for locations disposed radially inward from the peripheral edge. Non-uniform material removal rates at the substrate edge is believed, at least in part, to be caused by a combination of a polishing pad “rebound” effect and non-uniform fluid distribution across the substrate between the leading edge and the trailing edge of the polishing interface. The polishing pad rebound effect is believed to be caused, at least in part, by the higher downforce used to exert the retaining ring against the polishing pad than the downforce used to urge the material surface of the substrate against the polishing pad which causes a higher contact pressure at the interface of the polishing pad and the substrate edge. Non-uniform fluid distribution is also believed to be caused, at least in part, by the interaction between the retaining ring and the polishing pad to create an uneven fluid thickness between the leading edge and the trailing edge of the polishing interface. Earlier and ongoing solutions to the problems described above have focused on ever more complicated substrate carrier and retaining ring designs. Unfortunately, such substrate carriers and/or retaining ring designs can be undesirably expensive and complex.
Accordingly, what is need in the art are solutions to the problems described above.
Embodiments herein generally relate to chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) systems and methods for reducing non-uniform material removal rate at or near the peripheral edge of a substrate when compared to radially inward regions therefrom.
In one embodiment, a polishing system includes a substrate carrier comprising an annular retaining ring which is used to surround a to-be-processed substrate during a polishing process and a polishing platen. The polishing platen includes cylindrical metal body having a pad-mounting surface. The pad-mounting surface comprises a plurality of polishing zones which include a first zone having a circular or annular shape, a second zone circumscribing the first zone, and a third zone circumscribing the second zone. Here, at least portions of the pad-mounting surfaces in the first and third zones define a plane, the plane is orthogonal to a rotational axis of the polishing platen, the pad-mounting surface in the second zone is recessed from the plane, and a width of the second zone is less than an outer diameter of the annular retaining ring.
In another embodiment, a method of polishing a substrate includes urging a substrate against a surface of a polishing pad where the polishing pad is disposed on a pad-mounting surface of a polishing platen. The pad-mounting surface includes a plurality of polishing zones comprising a first zone having a circular or annular shape, a second zone circumscribing the first zone, and a third zone circumscribing the second zone. Here, at least portions of the pad-mounting surfaces in the first and third zones define a plane, the plane is orthogonal to a rotational axis of the polishing platen, and the pad-mounting surface in the second zone is recessed from the plane.
In another embodiment, a polishing platen includes a cylindrical metal body having a pad-mounting surface. The pad-mounting surface comprises a plurality of polishing zones which include a first zone having a circular or annular shape, a second zone circumscribing the first zone, and a third zone circumscribing the second zone. Here, at least portions of the pad-mounting surfaces of the first and third zones define a plane, the plane is orthogonal to a rotational axis of the polishing platen, the pad-mounting surface in the second zone is recessed from the plane, and a width of the second zone is less than an outer diameter of the annular retaining ring.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the Figures. It is contemplated that elements disclosed in one embodiment may be beneficially utilized on other embodiments without specific recitation.
Embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) systems, and more particularly, to polishing platens and methods for reducing non-uniform material removal rate at or near the peripheral edge of a substrate when compared to radially inward regions therefrom. Typically, depending on the type of CMP process, the material removal rate proximate to the peripheral edge of the substrate may be less than or greater than the average of material removal rates for locations disposed radially inward from the edge. The resulting non-uniform removal rate at the substrate edge is often respectively characterized as “slow edge” or “fast edge” material removal rate profile. Slow edge and fast edge material removal rate profiles are believed to be caused, at least in part, by a combined polishing pad “rebound” effect at the substrate edge and an unequal polishing fluid distribution at a polishing interface of the material surface of a substrate and the polishing pad. An example of a fast edge material removal rate profile 50 is schematically illustrated in
An example of the pad rebound effect is schematically illustrated in
Generally, to contain the substrate 13 at the desired polishing interface 10, a downforce is exerted on the retaining ring 26 that is greater than, and independent from, the downforce exerted on the substrate 13. The uneven pressure distribution between the retaining ring 26 and the peripheral edge of the substrate 13 proximate thereto causes the polishing pad 12 to deform or rebound at the outer and inner edges of the retaining ring 26 as the polishing pad 12 moves therebeneath. This pad rebounding effect 15 undesirably results in a non-uniform contact pressure distribution between the substrate 13 and the polishing pad 12 at the substrate edge and points radially inward therefrom.
In addition to the pad rebound effect, CMP material rate uniformity is also determined by a complicated tribological interaction between surfaces and fluids at the polishing interface and the relative motion therebetween. For example, without intending to be bound by theory, it is generally believed that the layer of polishing fluid at the polishing interface may be relatively thin at the leading edge of the substrate (as the polishing pad rotates therebeneath) and becomes progressively thicker towards the trailing edge. This uneven polishing fluid thickness between the leading and trailing edges of the substrate may further contribute to different, e.g., non-uniform, material removal rates at the substrate edge compared to points radially inward therefrom.
Thus, embodiments herein provide for polishing systems and polishing methods designed to substantially reduce and/or eliminate the pad rebound effect at the leading and trailing polishing edges of the substrate and substantially improve the otherwise non-uniform material removal rate profiles associated therewith. Beneficially, it is further believed the polishing systems and polishing methods described herein reduce polishing fluid thickness variation across the substrate surface to improve non-uniform material removal rate profiles that may be caused thereby.
Here, the polishing system 200 includes a polishing platen 202, a substrate carrier 204, a fluid delivery arm 206, a pad conditioner assembly 208, and a system controller 210. The polishing platen 202 features cylindrical platen body 214 and a low-adhesion-material layer 216 disposed on a surface of the platen body 214 to provide a polishing pad-mounting surface 218. The platen body 214 is typically formed of a suitably rigid, light weight, and polishing fluid corrosion resistant material, such as aluminum, an aluminum alloy (e.g., 6061 Aluminum), or stainless steel. The low-adhesion-material layer 216 typically comprises a polymer material formed of one or more fluorine-containing polymer precursors or melt-processable fluoropolymers. The low-adhesion-material layer 216 desirably reduces the amount of force required to remove a polishing pad 212 from the polishing pad-mounting surface 218 once the polishing pad 212 has reached the end of its useful lifetime and further protects the metal of the platen body 214 from undesirable polishing fluid caused corrosion.
Here, the pad-mounting surface 218 comprises a plurality of concentric zones 220a-c formed about a platen axis A. The plurality of concentric zones 220a-c include a circular (when viewed from top down) or annular first zone 220a, an annular second zone 220b circumscribing the first zone 220a, and an annular third zone 220c disposed radially outward from and circumscribing the second zone 220b.
Here, the pad-mounting surface 218 in the second zone 220b is recessed from a plane P a distance Z. The plane P is defined by the pad-mounting surface 218 in the first and third zones 220a,c which in some embodiments, and as shown in
In some embodiments, the pad-mounting surface 218 in the second zone 220b is recessed from the plane P by a distance Z of about 20 μm or more, about 30 μm or more, about 40 μm or more, about 50 μm or more, or about 60 μm or more. In some embodiments, the distance Z is between about 20 μm and about 500 μm, such as between about 20 μm and about 400 μm, between about 20 μm and about 300 μm, between about 20 μm and about 250 μm, or between about 20 μm and about 200 μm, such as between about 20 μm and about 150 μm. In some embodiments, the distance Z is between about 50 μm and about 500 μm, such as between about 50 μm and about 400 μm, between about 50 μm and about 400 μm, between about 50 μm and about 300 μm, between about 50 μm and about 250 μm, or between about 50 μm and about 150 μm.
In
In some embodiments, the width W of the recessed pad-mounting surface 218 in the second zone 220b is less than a diameter of the to-be-polished substrate 213, such as about 0.9× (times) the diameter D of the substrate or less, about 0.8× or less, about 0.75× or less, about 0.7× or less, about 0.65× or less, about 0.6× or less, about 0.55 or less, or about 0.5× or less than the diameter D of the to-be-polished substrate. For example, for a polishing platen 202 sized and configured for processing a 300 mm diameter substrate, the width W of the recessed pad-mounting surface 218 in the second zone 220b may be about 270 mm or less. In one embodiment, a polishing platen 202 sized to polish a 300 mm diameter substrate has a radius R(1) of between about 350 mm and about 400 mm, such as about 380 mm. In one embodiment, an inner radius R(2) of the second zone 220b is greater than about 0.15× the radius R(1), an outer radius R(3) of the second zone 220b is less than about 0.85× the radius R(1), and the width W of the second zone 220b is at least about 0.15× the radius R(1). Appropriate scaling may be used for polishing platens configured to process different sized substrates, e.g., for polishing platens configured to process 450 mm, 200 mm, or 150 mm diameter substrates.
In some embodiments, the pad-mounting surface 218 in the third zone 220c is not coplanar with the pad-mounting surface 218 in the second zone 220b. For example, in some embodiments the pad-mounting surface 218 in the third zone 220 is above or below (in the direction of gravity) a plane formed by the pad-mounding surface 218 in the first zone 220a. In some embodiments, the pad-mounting surface 218 in the third zone 220c is sloped such as shown and described in
In some embodiments, the annular second zone 220b is located and sized so that, during polishing, at least a portion of the substrate 213 is disposed over and spans the recessed pad-mounting surface 218 of the second zone 220b and at least portions of the substrate 213 are disposed over the pad-mounting surfaces 218 of the first and third zones 220a,c adjacent thereto. Thus, during substrate processing, distal regions of the rotating substrate carrier 204 and a to-be-polished substrate 213 disposed therein are concurrently disposed over the pad-mounting surfaces 218 in the first zone 220 and the third zone 220c. Concurrently therewith, the recessed pad-mounting surface 218 of the second zone 220b is rotated about the platen axis A to pass under the leading and trailing edges 222a,b (
Typically, the polishing pad 212 is formed of one or more layers of polymer materials and is secured to the pad-mounting surfaces 218a-c using a pressure sensitive adhesive. The polymer materials used to form the polishing pad 212 may be relatively compliant or may be rigid and formed with channels or grooves in the polishing surface thereof to allow the polishing pad 212 to conform to the recessed pad-mounting surface 218 in the second zone 220b and the pad-mounting surfaces 218 of the first and third zones 220a,c adjacent thereto. Thus, the polishing surface of the polishing pad 212 in each of the zones 220a-c has substantially the same shapes and relative dimensions as described above for the pad-mounting surface 218 of the platen 202.
Here, the rotating substrate carrier 204 is used to exert a downforce against the substrate 213 to urge a material surface of the substrate 213 against the polishing pad 212 as the polishing pad 212 is rotated about the platen axis A. As shown, the substrate carrier 204 features a flexible membrane 224 and an annular retaining ring 226. During substrate polishing, the flexible membrane 224 exerts a downforce against a non-active (backside) surface of the substrate 213 disposed therebeneath. The retaining ring 226 surrounds the substrate 213 to prevent the substrate 213 from slipping from the substrate carrier 204 as the polishing pad 212 moves therebeneath. Typically, the substrate carrier 204 is configured to exert a downforce against the retaining ring 226 that is independent from the downforce exerted against the substrate 213. In some embodiments, the substrate carrier 204 oscillates in the radial direction of the polishing platen to, in part, reduce uneven wear of the polishing pad 212 disposed there beneath.
Typically, the substrate 213 is urged against the polishing pad 212 in the presence of the one or more polishing fluids delivered by the fluid delivery arm 206. A typical polishing fluid comprises a slurry formed of an aqueous solution having abrasive particles suspended therein. Often, the polishing fluid contains one or more chemically active constituents which are used to modify the material surface of the substrate 213 thus enabling chemical mechanical polishing thereof.
The pad conditioner assembly 208 (
Typically, the conditioning disk 228 is coupled to the first actuator 230 using a gimbal which allows the conditioning disk 228 to maintain a parallel relationship with the surface of the polishing pad 212 as the conditioning disk 228 is urged thereagainst. Here, the conditioning disk 228 comprises a fixed abrasive conditioning surface, e.g., diamonds embedded in a metal alloy, and is used to abrade and rejuvenate the surface of polishing pad 212, and to remove polish byproducts or other debris therefrom. Typically, the conditioning disk 228 has a diameter between about 80 mm and about 130 mm, such as between about 90 mm and about 120 mm, or for example, about 108 mm (4.25 inches). In some embodiments, the diameter of the conditioning disk 228 is less than the width W of the second zone 220b so that the conditioning disk 228 may maintain contact with surface of the polishing pad 212 during conditioning thereof in the second zone 220b.
Here, the displacement sensor 238 is an inductive sensor which measures eddy currents to determine a distance Z(2) between an end of the sensor 238 to the metallic surface of the platen body 214 disposed therebeneath. The displacement sensor 238 and the position sensor 235 are used in combination to determine the recessed distance Z(3) of the surface of the polishing pad 212 in the second zone 220b from the surfaces of the polishing pad 212 in the first and third zones 220a,c adjacent thereto.
In some embodiments, the pad conditioner assembly 208 is used to maintain the recessed relationship of the surface of the polishing pad 212 in the second zone 220b relative to the surfaces of the polishing pad 212 in the first and third zones 220a,c adjacent thereto. In those embodiments, the system controller 210 may be used to change a dwell time of the conditioning disk 228 and/or a downforce on the conditioning disk 228 in the second zone 220b. As used herein dwell time refers to an average duration of time a conditioning disk 228 spends at a radial location as the conditioning disk 228 is swept from an inner radius to an outer radius of the polishing pad 212 as the platen 202 rotates to move the polishing pad 212 there beneath. For example, the conditioning dwell time per cm2 of polishing pad surface area in the second zone 220b may be increased or decreased relative to the conditioning dwell time per cm2 of polishing pad surface area in one or both of the first and/or third zone 220a,c adjacent thereto.
Here, operation of the polishing system 200, including operation of the pad-conditioning assembly 208, is facilitated by the system controller 210 (
Herein, the memory 242 is in the form of a computer-readable storage media containing instructions (e.g., non-volatile memory), that when executed by the CPU 240, facilitates the operation of the polishing system 200. Illustrative computer-readable storage media include, but are not limited to: (i) non-writable storage media (e.g., read-only memory devices within a computer such as CD-ROM disks readable by a CD-ROM drive, flash memory, ROM chips or any type of solid-state non-volatile semiconductor memory) on which information is permanently stored; and (ii) writable storage media (e.g., floppy disks within a diskette drive or hard-disk drive or any type of solid-state random-access semiconductor memory) on which alterable information is stored. The instructions in the memory 242 are in the form of a program product such as a program that implements the methods of the present disclosure (e.g., middleware application, equipment software application etc.). In some embodiments, the disclosure may be implemented as a program product stored on a non-transitory computer-readable storage media for use with a computer system. Thus, the program(s) of the program product define functions of the embodiments (including the methods described herein).
Here, the pad-mounting surface 318 in the third zone 320c slopes upwardly from the intersection with the pad mounting surface 318 in the second zone 320b to a circumferential edge of the platen 302 or a location proximate thereto. For example, for a platen body 314 sized for a 300 mm diameter substrate, the annular third zone 320b may have an inner radius of between about 250 mm and about 355 mm, such as between about 280 and about 330 mm. Typically, in those embodiments, the pad-mounting surface 318 in the third zone 320c is recessed from the plane P by an average distance Z(avg) which is about ⅔× or less than the recess Z(1) of the pad-mounting surface in the second zone 320b, such as about ½× or less. Here, the plane P is defined by at least portions of the pad-mounting surfaces of the first and third zones and is disposed orthogonal to the rotational axis A.
In some embodiments, the method 400 further includes urging a conditioning disk the surface of the polishing pad at activity 406, determining a radial position of the conditioning disk relative to the polishing platen at activity 408, and using a measurement from a displacement sensor and the determined radial position of the conditioning disk to determine a thickness of the polishing pad in each of the plurality of polishing zones at activity 410. In some embodiments, the method 400 further includes changing a conditioning dwell time or conditioning downforce in one or more of the plurality of polishing zones based on the determined thickness of the polishing pad therein at activity 412.
Beneficially, the method 400 may be used to substantially reduce the pad rebound effect at the leading and trailing edges of the polishing interface and to reduce uneven polishing fluid thickness distribution thereacross. Thus the method 400 may be used to substantially eliminate or reduce undesirable “fast edge” or “slow edge” material removal rate profiles.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present disclosure, other and further embodiments of the disclosure may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5558563 | Cote | Sep 1996 | A |
5836805 | Obeng | Nov 1998 | A |
5974679 | Birang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6036586 | Ward | Mar 2000 | A |
6040244 | Arai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045434 | Fisher, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6186864 | Fisher, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6220942 | Tolles et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6299519 | Easter et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6376378 | Chen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6488573 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6616513 | Osterheld | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6661224 | Linder | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6773332 | Moore | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6835116 | Oguri et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6872132 | Elledge et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6966816 | Swedek et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7018269 | Anderson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024268 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7040956 | Paik | May 2006 | B2 |
7070479 | Faustmann et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7097535 | Glashauser et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128803 | Owczarz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134947 | Stark et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7153185 | Birang et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7156722 | Min et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163439 | Chandrasekaran | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189140 | Shugrue et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7195536 | Swedek et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198546 | Berman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220163 | Shin | May 2007 | B2 |
7247080 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7258600 | Benner | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7306506 | Elledge | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314401 | Chandrasekaran | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7413986 | Paik | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7452264 | Mavliev et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7585425 | Ward | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7840305 | Behr et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7963826 | Nangoy et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8043870 | Manens et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8078419 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8182709 | Heinrich et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8337279 | Dhandapani et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
9138860 | Dhandapani et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9156130 | Shimano et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9308618 | Benvegnu | Apr 2016 | B2 |
10525566 | Hong et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10562147 | Butterfield et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
11222786 | Shin | Jan 2022 | B2 |
20020106971 | Rodriquez et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030060127 | Kaushal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030186627 | So | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040053566 | Tolles et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040259477 | Anderson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050095963 | Stark | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142987 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050173259 | Mavliev et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186892 | Chen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060196283 | Yang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226123 | Birang | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070298692 | Mavliev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080014845 | Yilmaz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090137190 | Togawa et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090191797 | Nabeya et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090247057 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090280580 | Manens et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090280850 | Mathur et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090318060 | Dhandapani et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110006761 | Redko et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110189856 | Xu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120270477 | Nangoy | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130017762 | Thaldorf et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130122783 | Menk et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130165023 | Sung | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150140900 | Lee et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160271749 | Shinozaki | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20180056476 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190143475 | Dhandapani et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190283208 | Dhandapani et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200164486 | Che | May 2020 | A1 |
20200282509 | Zhang | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210053180 | Yen | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1979359 | Jun 2007 | CN |
2007266547 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2009079984 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2011031322 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011031322 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2013010169 | Jan 2013 | JP |
1020170022583 | Mar 2017 | KR |
1020200062421 | Jun 2020 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Satake, JP-2011031322-A machine translation, Jul. 30, 2009 (Year: 2009). |
International Search Report/ Written Opinion issued to PCT/US2021/048033 dated Dec. 10, 2021. |
Kakireddy, Raghava, et al.—“High Performance Pad Conditioning (HPPC) Arm for Advanced Pad Conditioning” presentation, https://nccavs-usergroups.avs.org/wp-content/uploads/CMPUG2017/CMP417-7-Kakireddy-AMAT.pdf, last visited Sep. 28, 2020, 10 pages. |
Wei, Xiaomin, et al.—“Effect of Retaining Ring Slot Design on Slurry Film Thickness during CMP”, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 13 (4) H119-H121 (2010), 3 pages. |
Kwon, Tae-Young, et al.—“Scratch formation and its mechanism in chemical mechanical planarization (CMP)”, publication, Department of Materials Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 426-791, Korea, Jun. 14, 2013, pp. 280-305, 27 pages. |
Wu, Changhong, et al.—“Lubrication in Chemical and Mechanical Planarization”, publication, Intechopen.com, Oct. 26, 2016, pp. 255-267. |
Philipossian, Ara, et al.—“Chemical Mechanical Planarization and Old Italian Violins” publication, Micromachines 2019, 9, 37, 12 pages. |
Gu, Xun, et al.—“Qualification of Dynamic Pressure Distribution on Wafer by Pressure Sensing Sheet during Polishing”, publication, International Conference on Planarization/CMP Technology, Nov. 19-21, 2009, Fukuoka, 7 pages. |
Lee, Changsuk, et al.—“Analysis of Wafer Edge Pressure Distribution using Intelligent Pad in Chemical Mechanical Polishing”, publication, International Conference on Planarization/CMP Technology, Nov. 19-21, 2014, Kobe, 4 pages. |
Kim, Bum Jick, et al., “Polishing Platens and Polishing Platen Manufacturing Methods”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/884,888, filed May 27, 2020, 40 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220097206 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |