This invention relates to apparatus for polishing silicon wafers.
Silicon wafers are produced as precursors from which micro-electronic semiconductor components are produced. The wafers are grown for example by deposition of silicon onto a substrate, to produce discs typically 20 cm in diameter, which are split by cleavage parallel to their major surfaces (analogous to the cleavage of slate) to produce two thinner wafers. The resulting wafers require to be polished to give totally flat and planar surfaces for deposition of electronic components onto the surface by standard lithographic and etching techniques to form integrated chip semiconductor devices. Typically a 20 cm diameter wafer will produce forty micro processor chips.
The designed size of such integrated chips is steadily decreasing and the number of layers applied, e.g. by lithography onto the silicon surface is rising, to produce ever smaller and increasingly complex micro-circuits. Present semiconductors typically incorporate 3 or 4 metal layers, whilst it is expected that future designs will contain 5 or more layers. This increase in the number of layers applied is leading to ever more stringent requirements on the smoothness and planarity of the silicon wafers, since pits or scratches may produce voids which cannot be bridged by deposited material, as the widths and thicknesses of deposited layers are decreased, leading to unplanned resistances where a conductor is narrowed, or capacitances/non-conductive gaps, where breaks occur in deposited conductor layers, which interfere with or compromise the planned operation of the circuit.
The standard wafer polishing technique in use at present is to remove a wafer from a stack, or cassette of e.g. 10 wafers, by means of a robot arm, and manoeuvre the disc into position ver a rotating disc. The disc is usually coated with polyurethane, and the wafer is held in place by an overhead platen whilst being polished by the rotating disc. This is an adaptation of optical polishing technology used for polishing lenses, mirrors and other optical components. Once polishing is completed, the robot arm removes the wafer and transfers it to another work station for eventual lithographic deposition steps.
A significantly different approach is so-called Linear Planarisation Technology, developed by OnTrak, wherein an endless travelling belt is used to polish the wafer, in place of the rotating disc form of polishing tool. The belt used in this method is described in EP-A-0696495 and comprises an endless belt of sheet steel, having a polyurethane coating of low Shore A hardness. A major problem with these belts is the poor adhesion of polyurethane to steel. An adhesive or coupling agent is required for bonding between the steel and polyurethane to take place but in spite of the use of such an agent bond strength is insufficient to withstand the harsh conditions under which the belt operates—particularly the frictional forces occurring between the belt and wafer in the zone of contact. The tendency is for the polyurethane to wear out or to flake off within two days or so, and to repair this an area around the damaged coating has to be removed for fresh polyurethane to be added as a patch. This leaves seams or joints between the original coating and the patches which must be removed by complicated and expensive high-precision machinery and processes so as to ensure that a flat planar belt surface is maintained.
An object of the invention is to provide a belt-type apparatus for polishing silicon wafers wherein the problems arising from the use of a sheet metal belt, having a poorly bonded coating, are at least substantially overcome.
This invention provides for use in polishing silicon wafers, an endless belt to act as a polishing tool, characterised in that the belt comprises a woven or non-woven fabric coated with a suitable polymer.
The polymer is preferably polyurethane, preferably with a low Shore D hardness, e.g. from 65–75.
Alternatively the polymer may be any thermoset or thermoplastic polymer having a reasonably high abrasion resistance, such as polyamides, silicones, fluoropolymers, epoxy resins and thermoplastic polyurethanes.
The coating may comprise two or more layers of different hardnesses. The coating may comprise at least one layer of partially fused polymeric particles, or two or more thermoplastic polymers of different melting points.
The upper layer may be the harder layer.
On the other hand the intermediate layer may be the harder layer, and the upper layer may comprise a foamed plastic, or be formed of or incorporate thermally expandable expanded polystyrene beads which form pores in the plastics layer. Hollow microbeads of plastics, glass or soluble material may be incorporated in the upper layer.
Abrasive particles or fibres may be added to the upper layer, which may constitute a transparent coating, or be micro textured with micro-scaled grooves or surface roughness.
The fabric may be a substrate which is wove in endless form embodying yarns of high tensile strength and relatively low elongation.
A fabric woven in endless form lacks the weak spots of a seam or splice, which is a great advantage as these belts operate under extremely high tension to prevent the formation of ripples or wrinkles.
The belt thickness is typically 01.–0.2 inches, whilst the coating thickness is in the range 0.05–0.09 inches.
Examples of suitable yarns are meta- or para-aramids such as KEVLAR, NOMEX or TWARON; PBO or its derivatives; polyetherimide; polyimide; polyetherketone; PEEK; gel-spun UHMW polyethylene (such as DYNEEMA or SPECTRA); or polybenzimidazole; or other yarns commonly used in high-performance fabrics such as those for making aerospace parts. Mixtures or blends of any two or more yarns may be used, as may glass fibres (preferably sized), carbon or ceramic yarns including basalt or other rock fibres, or mixtures of such mineral fibres with synthetic polymer yarns. Any of the above yarns may be blended with organic yarns such as cotton. The belts according to the invention woven from these yarns are strong in the machine direction and sufficiently rigid in the cross machine direction.
Most preferred are aramid yarns due to their low weight and high strength.
A non woven fabric substrate may be provided in place of a woven substrate and be formed from any one, or a blend or mixture of any of the above mentioned yarns or fibres. More than one nonwoven substrate may be provided, preferably two, and they may be vertically aligned or offset relative to one another.
A belt substrate may comprise a non woven fabric with additional spaced apart linear yarns extending substantially in a common direction, and a polymeric matrix material interconnecting and at least partially encapsulating each of the yarns. The linear yarns preferably are oriented in the running direction of the belt, but may also or instead be oriented in the cross-machine direction, i.e. transversely of the belt e.g. as described in GB-A-2202873. Extra reinforcing yarns extending substantially in the machine direction may also be provided.
The belt substrate preferably has a relatively high open area due to the increase in delamination resistance, particularly if the substrate is fully impregnated with polymer. For this, a spiral link belt of the kind disclosed in GB-A-2051154, comprising an array of eg. cross-machine direction hinge wires, connected by interdigitating flattened helical coils is particularly preferred, as one large open area woven fabrics. This substrate may support a woven or non-woven fabric which is coated or partially or fully impregnated with the suitable polymer.
The surface of the belt may be formed with grooves extending in the running direction of the belt to remove wet slurry generated during the polishing process. This slurry can be removed from the belt grooves using one or more high pressure water jets, rotating fine brushes or hard non-metallic (e.g. ceramic) stylii.
Polishing is achieved by the motion of the belt 13 in contact with the surface of the wafer 12 which is to be polished, in forced contact under pressure with the wafer surface, from the platen 10 and ram 11.
In accordance with the invention the belt 13 is made from a substrate at least coated with a suitable polymeric material and some possible structures are illustrated in the following figures by way of example.
In
In
In
In
The hinge wires 51 and helical coils 52 may be of a suitable polyamide material or less preferably of metal wire.
The structure superposing a relatively hard top surface material over a relatively soft layer provides the benefits of a hard outer surface 62, with the resilience of the softer layer 64, reduces pressure on the wafer and thereby minimises the risk of wafer breakage.
The upper layer in any of the described embodiments may comprise at least one layer of partially fused polymeric particles, and/or comprise two or more thermoplastic polymers having different melting points. The sintered layer may optionally be reinforced by a textile material, e.g. a membrane, woven or nonwoven fabric, or chopped fibres. The layer may incorporate hollow microbeads of plastics, glass or soluble material (such as CMC) which latter break down to provide a porous surface. Glass beads are used for their abrasive properties.
Abrasive particles or fibres, such as TiO2; CeO2; SiC; Si3N4; Al2O3; glass; silicates; BaCO3; CaCO3; diamond or carbon may be added to the upper layer, which may also or instead consist of a transparent coating.
The surface of the upper layer may be provided with a micro textured coating, that is with micro-scale grooves or roughness, formed for example by machining, laser cutting (preferably with an ablation or excimer laser), or chemical means (e.g. by dissolving soluble particles such as sugar or cooking salt present in the upper layer.
Upon curing of the polyurethane these pellets expand to form hollow beads which are cut open when the cured belt is conditioned eg by grinding, providing location on the belt surface which can retain slurry.
Any of the various substrates illustrated may be used in combination with any of the single layer (
In the above embodiments the substrate fabric 20, 30 or cover layer 53 may be an endless woven material to avoid the weakness imported by a splice or seam. The fabric may be woven from yarns of a high tensile strength and relatively low elongation, such as meta- or para-aramids eg KEVLAR, NOMEX or TWARON; as well as PBO or its derivatives; polyetherimide, polyetherketone, PEEK, gel-spun UHMW polyethylene (eg DYNEEMA or SPECTRA); or polybenzimidazole. Yarns of these compositions may be mixed or blended and mineral fibres such as glass, carbon or ceramic yarns including rock fibres (eg basalt) on there own or mixed or blended with polymer yarns may be used. The aramids are most preferred however on account of their low weight and high strength.
The coating may also be any high abrasion resistance thermoset or thermoplastic polymer such as aliphatic polyamides, aliphatic aromatic copolyamides, silicones or epoxy resins.
Woven metal mesh and perforate metal sheet belt substrate may be used with the belt interstices being occupied by rivets or filers of polymeric material, improving bond strength between the polymer and the metal.
The main advantage of a chemical-mechanical polishing belt according to the invention is that improved bond strength is obtained between the preferably synthetic polymer substrate and the polymer coating. As a result, not only does the coating tend not to flake off so readily, but thicker coatings can be applied, possibly impregnating a substantial proportion of the substrate or even fully encapsulating it, meaning that belts last a lot longer on the machines before needing to be removed.
The belt is typically 1.5–3 metres in length, measured as the inner circumference of the endless belt, 0.2–0.6 metres in width, and 0.1–0.6 cm thick. The coating typically comprises 40–70% of the thickness.
The belt according to the invention may be applicable in other industries, for example for polishing and planarising optical flats and mirrors prior to coating of the latter with a reflective metallic layer.
This is a Division of prior U.S. application(s) Ser. No. 08/941,386, filing date Sep. 30, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,736,714 and which in turn is a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 08/903,004, filing date Jul. 30, 1997 now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
27817 | Mayall | Apr 1860 | A |
81986 | Crane | Sep 1868 | A |
4109543 | Foti | Aug 1978 | A |
4282011 | Terpay | Aug 1981 | A |
4396657 | Ibrahim | Aug 1983 | A |
4437269 | Shaw | Mar 1984 | A |
4478610 | Parekh et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4520059 | Worrall et al. | May 1985 | A |
4576612 | Shukla et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4649074 | Borel | Mar 1987 | A |
4728552 | Jensen, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
4753838 | Kimura et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4796749 | Lefferts | Jan 1989 | A |
4927432 | Budinger et al. | May 1990 | A |
4954141 | Takiyama et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4962562 | Englund et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5020283 | Tuttle | Jun 1991 | A |
5164241 | De La Porte et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5177908 | Tuttle | Jan 1993 | A |
5197999 | Thomas | Mar 1993 | A |
5212910 | Breivogel et al. | May 1993 | A |
5234867 | Schultz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5257478 | Hyde et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5287663 | Pierce et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5329734 | Yu | Jul 1994 | A |
5454750 | Cosmano et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5482756 | Berger et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487697 | Jensen | Jan 1996 | A |
5489233 | Cook et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5514456 | Lefferts | May 1996 | A |
5534106 | Cote et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5558568 | Talieh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573619 | Benedict et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573844 | Donovan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575707 | Talieh et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578362 | Reinhardt et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5605760 | Roberts | Feb 1997 | A |
5692947 | Talieh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5735731 | Lee | Apr 1998 | A |
5924917 | Benedict et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6328642 | Pant et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6406576 | Benedict et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406577 | Benedict et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6736714 | Dudovicz | May 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
696495 | Oct 1999 | EP |
63267155 | Nov 1988 | JP |
9616436 | May 1996 | WO |
9835785 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9835786 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9836442 | Aug 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040087262 A1 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08941386 | Sep 1997 | US |
Child | 10689678 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08903004 | Jul 1997 | US |
Child | 08941386 | US |