This application claims the filing date of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/568,516 filed Oct. 5, 2017 by the present inventors. This application expands the concepts of non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/296,260 filed Oct. 18, 2016 by the present inventors to include toe angle alignment for steer axles.
The following table indicates prior art that appears to be relevant to the invention disclosed:
The commercial trucking industry's profit margin is heavily dependent on the cost of fuel and tires. These two consumables can both be conserved by reducing rolling resistance of the truck and trailer wheels. The simplest way to reduce rolling resistance is to maintain alignment of the vehicle's wheels which are prone to becoming misaligned under heavy loading.
Many commercial trucking businesses are not equipped with alignment tools necessary to maintain their fleet of trucks and trailers. Instead they routinely send their vehicles to alignment shops that use complex and expensive alignment systems such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,401,236. The high cost associated with this type of alignment system, coupled with rising fuel and tire prices, has led to the development of simple, inexpensive, and portable alignment systems such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,913,404. However this type of alignment system is more prone to measurement error due to its dependence on less reliable measurement references and constraints.
The commercial trucking industry needs a toe angle alignment system that is simple, inexpensive, portable, and less susceptible to measurement error than alignment systems currently offered by the market. An alignment system that achieves these objectives will be disclosed.
The present invention is an axle alignment system for measuring steer axle toe angles. The system includes a laser emitter, a laser target, and mounting components. The laser emitter is mounted to a steer wheel such that the laser beam is projected perpendicular to the axis of the wheel toward the target. A laser target is placed in front of the vehicle with a measurement scale facing the laser emitter. A measurement is taken from the scale when the emitter is mounted on each end of the steer axle in question. The target is moved to the rear of the vehicle and the measurement process is repeated with the emitter facing rearward. The measurements taken from either end of the axle are input to a phone or desktop computer application along with the distance between the two target positions. The application uses the input measurements to calculate total toe angle between the steer wheels.
The primary advantage of this axle alignment system is that it only requires one laser emitter. Since the same laser emitter is used to take measurements on both ends of the axle in question, any error in parallelism within the laser emitter assembly is negated when the laser is flipped 180 degrees to measure the opposite end of the axle. The laser emitter error would be repeated in opposite directions to create a net zero error. Therefore, laser emitter calibration discrepancies produce little impact on the measurement accuracy. Additionally, a system that utilizes a single laser emitter is less costly than a system which relies on multiple lasers.
Another advantage of this toe measurement system is the large distance between the laser emitter and the laser target. The further the laser beam travels, the more sensitive the measurement scale is to angular deviation of the steer wheels. At a laser beam length of 285″, the toe angle precision is ±0.0125 degrees when the target scale demarcations are at 1/16″ increments. This allows the user to align the axle with greater precision than if the beam was projected a shorter distance.
Yet another advantage of this axle alignment system is that the laser emitter and targets are constrained using reliable constraints. Precisely machined surfaces on the laser emitter and targets are mated with precisely machined surfaces on the truck reference features. All degrees of freedom between the alignment apparatus and vehicle are completely constrained with tight clearances between mating features. These reliable references and constraints produce measurements that are both accurate and repeatable.
The preferred embodiment of the laser emitter assembly is illustrated by
The preferred embodiment of the laser target assembly is illustrated by
To align a steer axle toe angle (1) constrain the laser emitter assembly to one of the steer wheels with the laser emitter 6 facing the front of the vehicle and the laser beam roughly parallel with the ground, (2) place the target assembly in front of the vehicle at a predetermined distance from the center of the steer wheel, (3) orient the target parallel to the steer axle, roughly centered with the center line of the vehicle with the measurement scales facing the laser emitter assembly, (4) press button 7 to emit a laser dot on the front of target tube 14, (5) measure the laser dot position on measurement scale 12 or measurement scale 15, (6) repeat steps 1 through 4 on the opposite steer wheel, (7) constrain the laser emitter assembly to one of the steer wheels with the laser emitter 6 facing the rear of the vehicle and the laser beam roughly parallel with the ground, (8) place the target assembly behind the vehicle at a predetermined distance from the center of the steer wheel, (9) orient the target parallel to the steer axle, roughly centered with the center line of the vehicle with the measurement scales facing the laser emitter assembly, (10) press button 7 to emit a laser dot on the front of target tube 14, (11) measure the laser dot position on measurement scale 12 or measurement scale 15, (12) Repeat steps 7 through 10 on the opposite steer wheel, (11) A mathematical algorithm is used to determine the total toe angle between the steer wheels using the four measurements taken and the predetermined target distances. (12) If necessary, toe adjustments are made and steps 1-11 are repeated to verify that the desired total toe angle has been achieved.
The preceding disclosures of preferred embodiments are in no way intended to limit the listed claims. The devices described in these claims may be manufactured using various materials, may take on forms other than the illustrated embodiments, and may be used for aligning axles of various types.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2532593 | Bender et al. | Dec 1950 | A |
3181248 | Manlove | May 1965 | A |
3691642 | Nolte et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
4347668 | Johnston | Sep 1982 | A |
4500201 | Lill | Feb 1985 | A |
4942667 | Fournier | Jul 1990 | A |
5056231 | Alusick et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5157838 | Sims | Oct 1992 | A |
5313710 | Wakamori et al. | May 1994 | A |
5367778 | O'Hara | Nov 1994 | A |
5675408 | Samuelsson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5852241 | Fagerdahl et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6082011 | Philips, III | Jul 2000 | A |
6282799 | Warkotsch | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6522400 | Horn | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6718646 | Corghi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6799376 | Voeller et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7661198 | Hara | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7913404 | Smith | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7941935 | Khan | May 2011 | B2 |
8401236 | Kassouf et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
10113866 | Schwarz et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
20050115088 | Paulsen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20130239420 | Kroll | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150048225 | Liu | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20170158241 | Prusinowski | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-9219932 | Nov 1992 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Toe (automotive)”, Wikipedia Website, Web page <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_(automotive)>, 2 pages, dated at east as early as Sep. 14, 2021, retrieved from Wikipedia website on Sep. 14, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190107390 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62568516 | Oct 2017 | US |