The present invention relates generally to a power device comprising a low Figure of Merit (“FOM”).
For VDMOS (Vertical, double-Diffused, Metal-Oxide, Semiconductor) devices used as power switches, gate charge Qg plays an important role for generating switching loss. In general, it is desirable to achieve the lowest gate charge Qg possible for maximum switching performance. The RQg FOM thus determines switching performance in terms of conduction and gate drive power loss, and is represented by the equation RQg FOM=(Rds(on)×Qg). As previously noted, FOM should be minimized. Current VDMOS has relatively high Qg and thus a high FOM, which results in power loss, especially for applications in which switching loss is dominant.
One method for evaluating MOSFET (Metal-Oxide Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor) devices is by comparing the FOM or Figure of Merit. One simple FOM is the RQg FOM. In its simplest form, the RQg figure of merit includes gate charge (Qg) multiplied by the “on” resistance between the drain and source of the device (Rds(on)). The result of this multiplication generates the RQg FOM, which can then be used to compare devices or certain device technologies. In general, a lower RQg FOM corresponds to a lower switching loss.
Methods have been tried to reduce the Qg without significantly increasing Rds(on). One typical approach is to have planar “split gate” structure by removing the gate polysilicon on the top of a JFET (Junction Field-Effect Transistor) neck. In this case, gate to drain overlap is significantly reduced. While both Qg (gate charge) and Qgd (gate to drain charge) will both decrease but Rds(on) is increased. In addition, the “split gate” approach has a minimal impact on Qgs (gate to source charge), which is also important in determining device switching performance.
A device comprises a cell, wherein each cell comprises a body comprising a main top surface and a main bottom surface; a gate on the main surface on the device having a first length; a gate isolation layer over the gate having a second length at least twice as long as the first length; a source contact in the device body proximate to the gate; a source metal layer over the gate isolation layer; and a drain on the main bottom surface of the cell.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
According to embodiments, methods, transistor cells, and transistor devices comprising a plurality of transistor cells are described that are configured to reduce the Qg without significantly increasing Rds(on), thus improving FOM. By removing one of the two source contacts in a conventional SJ VDMOS device cell while maintaining the other device structures, the polysilicon gate length is significantly reduced and FOM is improved. Embodiment concepts can be adapted to other device types as well. For example, any vertical device having two symmetrical source contacts can modified as described herein. The device cells can be replicated in two or more configurations while maintaining the improvement in FOM according to embodiments.
Thus, device cell 100 includes N+ source contacts 108A and 108B on both sides of the polysilicon gate 106. Drain current flows to each N+ source contact through left channel and right channels during conduction.
It is known in the art that a plurality of device cells are replicated in a pattern of, for example, rows and columns and interconnected to complete an entire power device.
Note that the single insulated gate 206 and the single source contact 208 are asymmetrically arranged with respect to gate insulation layer 204. In various embodiments, insulated gate 206 and source contact 208 each have lengths less than one-half that of the length of the gate insulation layer 204. In some embodiments, insulated gate 206 and source contact 208 each have lengths less than one-third that of the length of the gate insulation layer 204. In an embodiment, the length of the polysilicon gate 206 can be a minimum length, thus reducing the corresponding gate to drain overlap.
In comparing device cell 200 with exemplary device cell 100, gate charges Qg and Qgd are significantly reduced and a much lower FOM (Rds(on)×Qg) is realized. A slightly higher specific Rds(on) (Rds(on)×AA) is realized, where AA is the Active Area of the SJ VDMOS device. Comparing device cell 200 with prior art device cell 100, only half of the source contact length is used (208 vs 108A and 108B) and the single source contact 208 is asymmetrically located with respect to the gate insulation layer 204. In addition, the length of polysilicon gate 206 is significantly reduced with respect to polysilicon gate 106. For example, in an embodiment the length of polysilicon gate 206 can be less than one-half that of polysilicon gate 106. In another embodiment the length of polysilicon gate 206 can be less than one-third that of polysilicon gate 106. In another embodiment the length of polysilicon gate can be a minimum gate length based on critical dimensions of a given semiconductor manufacturing process.
Both device cells 100 and 200 have the same P+ contacts 103 and 203 that are shorted to the corresponding source metal regions 102 and 202 as previously described. Removing one of the N+ contacts and/or shrinking the gate polysilicon length in device cell 200 does not alter the source to drain overlap, which is corroborated below with respect to the simulation and measurement results shown in
The second device cell 100B also includes a first source contact stripe 108A, a second source contact stripe 108B, and a polysilicon gate stripe 106 corresponding to the same features shown in
The total cell pitch of both of the device cells 100A and 100B (“2× cell pitch”) is shown in
The second device cell 200B also includes a single source contact stripe 208 and a polysilicon gate stripe 206 corresponding to the same features shown in
The total cell pitch of both device cells 200A and 200B (“2× cell pitch”) is shown in
Note that device cells 200A and 200B include “charge reduction stripes” 210 that are not associated with directing the vertical current flow of the device, and do not include either a source stripe 208 or a gate stripe 206. A source implant is performed on both sides of the polysilicon gate in the prior art device, while only a single-sided source implant is performed in the devices shown in
The second cell 300B also includes a single source contact stripe 308 and a polysilicon gate stripe 306 corresponding to the same features shown in
While layout configurations can use the cell layouts shown in
Table 600 is based on a 100V BV (Breakdown Voltage datasheet rating) SJ VDMOS platform, which summarizes FOM related device parameters. A significant reduction of Qg (gate charge Qg is defined as the charge from zero to the point at which the driving voltage Vgs equals the actual gate voltage of the device), Ciss (effective input capacitance seen by the gate drive circuit, Ciss=Cgs+Cgd with Cds shorted), Crss (reverse transfer capacitance, Crss=Cgd, which is also called Miller Capacitance), and FOM (Figure of Merit: Rds(on)×Qg) achieved when comparing the single source stripe device to the exemplary dual source stripe device. Also shown in
The FOM percentage reduction is a function of polysilicon gate length. In a specific range, the shorter the length, the more the improvement in FOM. While the polysilicon gate length can be reduced to the minimum amount, this may cause a corresponding increase in Rds(on). Thus, in some embodiments the polysilicon gate length is chosen to be above the minimum length geometry offered by the manufacturing technology used, since Rds(on) will be on the border of starting to increase dramatically which will be more dominant than the Qg reduction so FOM will be the same or even higher so it is not possible to push this parameter to a point that even small variation will affect device parameters dramatically.
Compared to the exemplary devices shown in
Thus, embodiments have been described wherein, with respect to the two source contact exemplary devices, half of the source contact and corresponding channel have been removed, and the length of the polysilicon gate has been reduced. Devices according to embodiments described herein exhibit improved performance and lower FOMs due to the reduction of Qg being more than the increase of Rds(on).
Device embodiments can be used in small power converters because the circuits used in the small power converters are normally are single ended and subject to hard switching. Device embodiments can also be used in low voltage applications, especially when switching loss is dominant (e.g., the top switch of buck converter). Device embodiments can also be used in combination with conventional devices, for example as a top switch and the conventional device as bottom switch (where conduction loss is dominant) for optimal efficiency.
When constructing a power device, a plurality of cells as shown in
In an example, a device comprises a cell, wherein each cell comprises: a body comprising a main top surface and a main bottom surface; a gate on the main surface on the device having a first length; a gate isolation layer over the gate having a second length at least twice as long as the first length; a source contact in the device body proximate to the gate; a source metal layer over the gate isolation layer; and a drain on the main bottom surface of the cell. The device can comprise a plurality of substantially identical cells, wherein the gate is asymmetrical with respect to the gate isolation layer, and wherein the source contact is asymmetrical with respect to the gate isolation layer. The second length can be at least three times as long as the first length. The gate can comprise a minimum length gate, and can comprise a polysilicon gate.
In another example, a device comprises a cell, wherein each cell comprises: a gate stripe having a first edge and a second edge; a source stripe extending along and being overlapped by the first edge of the gate stripe; and a charge reduction stripe extending along the second edge of the gate stripe. The device can comprise a plurality of substantially identical cells, and further comprises forming a channel underneath the gate stripe in an active mode of operation, and not forming a channel underneath the charge reduction stripe in the active mode of operation. A length of the charge reduction stripe is greater than a length of the source stripe or the gate stripe. The gate stripe can comprise a minimum length gate stripe, and can comprise a polysilicon gate stripe.
An example method of fabricating a device cell comprises forming a gate on a main surface of the device cell having a first length; forming a gate isolation layer over the gate having a second length at least twice as long as the first length; forming a source contact proximate to the gate; forming a source metal layer over the gate isolation layer; and forming a drain on a main bottom surface of the device cell. The example method comprises forming a plurality of substantially identical cells, wherein the gate is formed asymmetrically with respect to the gate isolation layer, and wherein the source contact is formed asymmetrically with respect to the gate isolation layer. Forming the gate can comprise forming a minimum length gate and can comprise forming a polysilicon gate.
While this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is therefore intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5817546 | Ferla | Oct 1998 | A |
5877515 | Ajit | Mar 1999 | A |
6236083 | McLachlan | May 2001 | B1 |
6376878 | Kocon | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6621122 | Qu | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6791143 | Baliga | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6853033 | Liang | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7504676 | Bhalla et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7651918 | de Fresart | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8466510 | Guan | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8692324 | Korec | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8829614 | Guan | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9082845 | Seok | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9627470 | Song | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9647059 | Guan | May 2017 | B2 |
10388737 | Bolotnikov | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20060249785 | Bhalla | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070045727 | Shiraishi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080017916 | Kanetaka | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090176341 | Saggio | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110017998 | Nakano | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110042739 | Cascio | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120007104 | Wada | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120193643 | Masuda | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120280314 | Parthasarathy | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130140633 | Pattanayak | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140045322 | Tamaso | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140138737 | Bobde | May 2014 | A1 |
20150162431 | Zinn | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160093733 | Banerjee | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1096573 | May 2001 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200287038 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |