Patent Grant
9715769
This disclosure relates to vehicles, and more particularly to improving the accuracy of the determination of yaw rate in vehicles.
Sensing yaw rate is important to land-based vehicles, and specifically, to road-going vehicles. Vehicle systems, such as collision avoidance systems, collision mitigation systems and stability control systems, may require accurate values of yaw rate to correctly determine the projected path of vehicle travel. Yaw rate sensors are susceptible to error, and if the measured yaw rate has significant error, then these kinds of vehicle systems may perform poorly or even fail. For example, significant error in the measured yaw rate could trigger a collision mitigation system to mistakenly determine that the vehicle is going to collide with another vehicle and could invoke emergency braking of the vehicle. Such braking could be dangerous if other vehicles are close behind and emergency braking is not warranted. Perhaps even worse, the system may mistakenly determine that the vehicle is not about to be in a collision and the system does not take action to prevent an otherwise avoidable collision.
A yaw rate offset is used to correct measured yaw rate error. In some embodiments, the yaw rate offset may be updated when the vehicle is stationary. The vehicle may be determined to be stationary by referencing at least two sensors. The first sensor provides an indication that the vehicle speed is zero. In embodiments, wherein the first sensor is a speed sensor, it can be insensitive to movement at low speeds, such as when pulling out of a parking space. Thus, the acceleration or derivative of acceleration (commonly referred to as “jerk”) obtained from the second sensor, which is sensitive to slight movements, is also used to more confidently determine that the vehicle is stationary. In some embodiments, the yaw rate offset may be updated when the vehicle is moving straight. A camera that captures images of or image data representative of the road the vehicle is driving on may be used to determine that the vehicle is moving straight. Lane delimiters may be detected in the camera images with the goal of determining whether the vehicle is moving parallel to the lane delimiters. In a preferred embodiment, the yaw rate offset is updated both at times when the vehicle is stationary and at times when the vehicle is moving straight. In some embodiments, the yaw rate offset may be updated by combining a new yaw rate offset with a previous yaw rate offset according to a ratio. The ratio may be based on a level of confidence that the vehicle is indeed in an operating condition suitable for updating the yaw rate offset.
In a particular embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method for determining a yaw rate for a road-based vehicle having a yaw rate sensor, the method comprising:
(a) capturing images or image data representative of the environment outside the vehicle;
(b) determining if the vehicle is moving and has a zero yaw rate at least based on the images, such as based at least in part on image processing of image data captured by a camera;
(c) obtaining a first measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor when the vehicle is determined in step (b) to be moving and to have a zero yaw rate;
(d) determining a yaw rate offset based at least in part on the measured yaw rate obtained in step (c);
(e) obtaining a second measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor; and
(f) determining a corrected yaw rate for the vehicle based on the second measured yaw rate and the yaw rate offset.
In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a system for determining a corrected yaw rate for a yaw rate sensor on a land-based vehicle. The system includes a camera configured to be mounted to the vehicle, and a control system connected to the yaw rate sensor and the camera, the control system is operable to carry out the method described above.
In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method for determining a yaw rate for a road-based vehicle having a yaw rate sensor, the method comprising:
(a) obtaining an acceleration from an accelerometer positioned to sense a longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle;
(b) determining a rate of change of the acceleration;
(c) determining the vehicle speed;
(d) carrying out a determination of a yaw rate offset based at least in part on a first measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor, at least in part depending on whether the rate of change of the acceleration determined in step (b) is approximately zero, and at least in part depending on if the vehicle speed is zero;
(e) obtaining a second measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor; and
(f) determining a corrected yaw rate for the vehicle based on the second measured yaw rate and the yaw rate offset.
In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a system for determining a corrected yaw rate for a yaw rate sensor on a land-based vehicle. The system includes an accelerometer configured to or operable to sense a longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle, a speed sensor and a control system connected to all three sensors. The control system is configured to or operable to carry out the method described above.
In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method for determining a yaw rate for a road-based vehicle having a yaw rate sensor and at least one other sensor, the method comprising:
(a) determining whether the vehicle has a yaw rate of zero;
(b) obtaining a first measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor depending on the determination made in step (a);
(c) determining a yaw rate offset that is a first selected proportion of the first measured yaw rate obtained in step (b) and a second selected proportion of a previous yaw rate offset, wherein the first selected proportion and the second selected proportion are selected based on a set of criteria based on data determined from the at least one other sensor;
(d) obtaining a second measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor; and
(e) determining a corrected yaw rate for the vehicle based on the second measured yaw rate and the yaw rate offset.
These and other objects, advantages, purposes and features of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.
The drawings illustrate, by way of example only, embodiments of the present disclosure.
Referring now to the drawings and the illustrative embodiments depicted therein,
As shown in
The control system 18 controls aspects of the vehicle's operations. The control system 18 may comprise a single device or it may comprise a plurality of devices that communicate with one another. The control system 18 may comprise a separate device that is dedicated to carrying out the functions described below, or alternatively it may be partly or wholly contained within a unit that carries out other functions, such as the engine control unit (not shown) or vehicle control unit (not shown). The control system 18 will be discussed in further detail below with respect to
The camera 20 is positioned to capture image data or images representative of the scene exterior of the vehicle 10 and encompassed by the field of view of the camera. In this example, the camera 20 is positioned in a forward-facing manner at the windshield of the vehicle 10. The camera 20 may be included as part of a rearview mirror assembly. In other examples, the camera 20 may be positioned elsewhere on the vehicle 10, such as at the front or rear bumpers. The camera 20 is operable to capture images of the road on which the vehicle 10 is travelling. The camera 20 may also be operable to capture images of other vehicles, road surface characteristics (such as, for example, lane markings or lane delimiters or the like), hazards on or near the road and other features of interest. The camera 20 may be provided with a camera control system (not shown) that processes images or image data captured by the camera. The camera 20 or the camera control system is connected to the control system 18 to output images and/or image information to the control system 18.
One or more of the camera control system and the control system 18 is capable of processing images captured by the camera 20 to detect lane markers or delimiters 32 (
The yaw rate sensor 22 is operable to sense the left and right yaw rate of the vehicle 10 (in other words, to sense the positive and negative angular rotational velocity of the vehicle about a local vertical axis A of the vehicle). Output of the yaw rate sensor 22 to the control system 18 may comprise a voltage within a range of voltages, such as about 0 to 5 volts, with about 2.5 volts being indicative of zero yaw rate, or a data message sent over a communications bus or network bus of the vehicle, such as a CAN bus or the like. The yaw rate sensor 22 may include any type of device, such as piezoelectric device, a micromechanical device, a microelectromechanical device, or similar. The longitudinal accelerometer 24 is operable to sense the longitudinal (forward or reverse) acceleration of the vehicle 10 and provide a signal indicative of a magnitude of such acceleration to the control system 18. The longitudinal accelerometer 24 may include any type of device, such as piezoelectric device, a micromechanical device, a microelectromechanical device, or similar. The longitudinal accelerometer 24 may be part of a multi-axis accelerometer.
The yaw rate sensor 22 and the longitudinal accelerometer 24 may be provided together in a sensor package that outputs aggregated data to the control system 18. Alternatively, the yaw rate sensor 22 and the longitudinal accelerometer 24 may be provided separately.
The transmission sensor 26 senses whether the vehicle transmission 14 is in park, in the case of an automatic transmission, or whether the transmission is disengaged, in the case of a manual transmission. The brake sensor 31 (
The steering angle sensor 28 communicates to the control system 18 information relating to the steering angle of the vehicle 10. In the embodiment shown, the steering angle sensor 28 senses a rotational position of the steering column (not shown), however the steering angle sensor 28 may be positioned anywhere suitable for sensing any suitable vehicle component related to the vehicle steering. The steering angle sensor 28 can provide to the control system 18 information indicative of whether the vehicle 10 is not turning, that is, whether the wheels 12 are positioned to move the vehicle 10 straight.
The speed sensor 30 is operable to sense a speed of the vehicle 10. The speed sensor 30 may be positioned at all of the wheels 12 of the vehicle 10. The speed sensor 30 provides to the control system 18 an indication of the vehicle's speed, and in some embodiments the speed sensor 30 may further provide an indication of the vehicle's direction of travel. For example, the speed sensors 30 may be used to determine, whether the vehicle is driving forward or in reverse. In another example, if there is a difference in the speeds recorded at left and right speed sensors 30 it is an indication that the vehicle is travelling in an arc.
Referring to
The control system 18 may operate on yaw rates stored in degrees per second, radians per second or any other units. However, the control system 18 may alternatively directly operate on yaw rates stored in other units, such as volts, binary values, or pulses, to name a few.
An example of the operation of the vehicle 10 using the yaw rate sensor 22 is shown in
Another example of the operation of the control system 18 is shown in
Yet another example is shown in
Thus, it can be seen that yaw rate is a factor in predicting collisions. The vehicle 10 may use the yaw rate sensor 22 in a collision mitigation or avoidance system, of which the control system 18 may be a component. The vehicle 10 may additionally or alternatively use the yaw rate sensor 22 with an electronic stability control system, of which the control system 18 may be a component.
However, it should be noted that the examples of
Besides temperature, errors can also be caused by electromagnetic interference (EMI) and variation in sensor quality. Although a temperature sensor located at a yaw rate sensor could be used to compensate for errors due to temperature, this can greatly increase the cost of the sensor, since such sensors are typically instrumentation-grade and impractical to use for high production volumes. Known error compensation and filtering techniques may delay output of yaw rate to other systems, such as a stability control system, that may require low delays in yaw rate data. In addition, since multiple different systems of the vehicle 10 may require yaw rates according to different criteria (such as, for example, low delay, averaged, filtered), it may be advantageous to allow those systems to process yaw rates according to their specific criteria by providing to all such systems common yaw rates that have been filtered as little and as quickly as possible.
As a result, a collision mitigation system on board the vehicle 10 would not determine that the second vehicle 34 is in the projected path of the vehicle 10. As a result, it would not appropriately apply emergency braking or warn the driver of vehicle 10 in the event of an impending collision between the two vehicles 10 and 34. When the vehicle 10 reaches point B and steers into the left lane 92 (such as, for example, with an actual yaw rate of about −0.5 degrees/second) to avoid a collision with the second vehicle 34, the sensor error would cause the control system 18 to determine the vehicle's yaw rate to be about 0 degrees per second, which falsely indicates that the vehicle 10 is travelling straight, as shown by projected path 56, as opposed to correctly indicating that the vehicle 10 is turning left with a yaw rate of about −0.5 degrees per second, as indicated at 58.
Due to this error, a collision avoidance or mitigation system of the vehicle 10 may incorrectly apply emergency braking to prevent the apparent imminent collision with the second vehicle 34, which can be dangerous. Unfortunately, even if the control system 18 attempts to correct the error in the yaw rate signal from the yaw rate sensor 22 based on a fixed formula or a fixed lookup table (so as to compensate for error caused by ambient temperature), it is still not sufficient, since the amount of error in the yaw rate signal can drift for a variety of reasons. Accordingly, a control system 18 can still have significant error in the determined yaw rate for the vehicle 10 when employing such techniques to correct for error.
Techniques for correcting output of the yaw rate sensor 22 for error in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention will now be discussed.
The input/output interface 66 can include a bus, such as a CAN bus. The input/output interface 66 can include one or more analog-to-digital converters to convert analog signals from any of the sensors 22-31 (in embodiments wherein any of them are analog devices) into digital signals usable by the processor 62.
The memory 64 stores a vehicle stationary detection routine 72, a vehicle straight driving detection routine 74, and a yaw rate offset filter routine 76. Such routines may be in the form of any programmatic entity such as a program, a routine, a subroutine, a function, a script, executable instructions, intermediate instructions that are executed to generate executable instructions, an object, and a class, to name a few. Any of the routines 72-76 can include lookup tables for obtaining lookup values using known values. The routines 72-76 may be provided as separate routines, as illustrated. Alternatively, two or more of the routines 72-76 may be provided together in a larger routine. In addition, any of the routines 72-76 may be separated into two or more smaller routines.
The memory 64 further stores a yaw rate offset 78 as a variable value that may be updated when appropriate. To determine a new yaw rate offset (such as to update the yaw rate offset 78), the processor 62 references the camera 20 and sensors 22-30, executes the routines 72-76 to act on the information obtained from the camera 20 and sensors 22-30, and further references the stored yaw rate offset 78.
As the processor 62 obtains one or more yaw rates from the yaw rate sensor 22, the one or more yaw rates may be stored in a buffer 82 in the memory 64. The processor 62 can reference the buffer 82 for a yaw rate required by the routines 72-76, and can ignore spurious yaw rates in the buffer 82 or apply an input filter to one or more of these yaw rates to reduce noise and obtain a filtered input yaw rate.
The processor 62 can further obtain a corrected yaw rate 80 by subtracting the yaw rate offset 78 from a measured yaw rate obtained from the yaw rate sensor 22. The corrected yaw rate 80 may be output to the memory 64 for storage for later use by the processor 62 in performing routines that require a corrected yaw rate, such as routines for collision mitigation or avoidance or stability control. The processor 62 may additionally or alternatively output the corrected yaw rate 80 to the input/output interface 66 for use by other systems of the vehicle 10.
The vehicle stationary detection routine 72 and the vehicle straight driving detection routine 74 are used determine when the vehicle 10 is in a condition where the actual yaw rate of the vehicle 10 is approximately zero, and therefore the signal sent from an ideal yaw rate sensor would indicate a yaw rate of zero. When the vehicle is in such a condition, it is conducive to determining the amount of error that exists in the real yaw rate sensor 22, and therefore is conducive to updating the yaw rate offset 78. In a simple embodiment, when the vehicle 10 is determined to be either stationary or moving in a straight path, the yaw rate offset 78 may simply be determined to be the measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor 22. It will be understood that, in some circumstances, it is at least theoretically possible for even the most sophisticated control system 18 to determine that the vehicle is stationary or is moving in a straight path, when the vehicle 10 is, in fact, not. If the yaw rate offset 78 were simply replaced with the measured yaw rate at that time, a potentially large error could inadvertently be introduced into the yaw rate offset 78. To reduce the potential for introducing a large error into the yaw rate offset 78, in some more complex embodiments, updating the yaw rate offset 78 entails:
(a) determining the vehicle 10 is either stationary or is moving in a straight path; and
(b) if the vehicle is determined to be either stationary or moving in a straight path, adding a percentage of the value of the measured yaw rate with a percentage of the previously stored value yaw rate offset, to arrive at an updated value for the yaw rate offset 78.
Each of the routines 72-76 will now be discussed in detail. The vehicle stationary detection routine 72 references the longitudinal accelerometer 24 to determine whether the vehicle 10 is stationary. A longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle 10 may be obtained over a selected duration of time. A derivative or rate of change of the longitudinal acceleration can then be determined. The first derivative of acceleration is known as jerk. When the value of jerk is determined to indicate that the vehicle 10 is stationary, the vehicle stationary detection routine 72 can reference the yaw rate sensor 22 to obtain a measured yaw rate that is used for the updating of the yaw rate offset 78.
The value of jerk that would be indicative of a stationary vehicle would be a value that is approximately zero. The selected duration of time may be several seconds (such as, for example, about 0.5 seconds). However, it will be noted that when the vehicle 10 is under a constant acceleration, the value of jerk would also be approximately zero. Thus, the control system 18 does not rely on the value of jerk alone to determine when the vehicle 10 is stationary. The control system 18 also uses at least one other criterion to support a determination that the vehicle 10 is stationary. For example, another criterion may be that the vehicle speed (as measured by speed sensor 30) is measured to be approximately zero. An example of another criterion (in embodiments wherein the vehicle 10 is equipped with an automatic transmission) is whether the gear selector for the transmission is in ‘Park’, as determined by the transmission sensor 26. If the vehicle 10 is equipped with a manual transmission, the criterion could instead be whether the gear selector for the transmission is in ‘Neutral’, as determined by the transmission sensor 26 and whether the main brake system (such as the brake pedal of the vehicle) has been depressed beyond a selected amount for a selected period of time or whether the parking brake system has been depressed or actuated.
As a condition for referencing the longitudinal accelerometer 24 to determine the current value of jerk, the vehicle stationary detection routine 72 may first determine whether the vehicle speed obtained from the vehicle speed sensor 30 is approximately zero for a selected duration (such as, for example, about 0.5 seconds), and/or whether the gear selector is in ‘Park’ (for an automatic transmission) or whether the gear selector is in neutral (for a manual transmission) and the brake is sufficiently depressed for sufficiently long, thereby saving the processor 62 from having to determine jerk when the vehicle 10 is known by the control system 18 to not meet other criteria for being stationary.
Determining whether the vehicle 10 is stationary by using the value of jerk in addition to vehicle speed and/or the position of the gear selector is advantageous over a system that would determine whether the vehicle is stationary using only vehicle speed and/or gear selector position, without using the value of jerk. This is because there are situations in which the measured vehicle speed from the speed sensor 30 could be zero, even though the vehicle is moving. An example would be when the vehicle 10 is being carried on a ferry. It will be noted that when the vehicle 10 is being carried on a ferry, the gear selector for the transmission would also be in ‘Park’. Thus, when the vehicle is on a ferry, a control system of the prior art could be fooled into determining that the vehicle is stationary even though it is not. However, the movements of the ferry during transport of the vehicle 10 could be sensed by the longitudinal accelerometer 24 and would result in a value of jerk that is non-zero. Thus, by basing the determination of whether the vehicle 10 is stationary on the value of jerk in addition to at least one other criterion such as vehicle speed and/or gear selector the control system 18 is inhibited from determining that the vehicle 10 is stationary in such a situation.
Using the value of jerk is advantageous over simply using the value of longitudinal acceleration itself, because there are situations in which the vehicle 10 is stationary but where the longitudinal acceleration sensor 24 would signal to the control system 18 that there is an acceleration on the vehicle, thereby misleading the control system 18 to determine that the vehicle 10 is not stationary. Such a situation would be, for example, when the vehicle 10 is stationary on a downhill slope or on an uphill slope. In such situations, the acceleration sensor 24 would sense the force of gravity urging the vehicle to roll down the slope. Thus, the sensor 24 would send signals to the control system 18 that are non-zero and which have a magnitude determined by the angle of the slope on which the vehicle 10 is positioned. As a result, the control system 18 could determine that the vehicle is under acceleration even though the vehicle may be stationary. However, the force of gravity is constant, and so value of jerk that would exist in such a situation would be approximately zero. Thus, by determining whether the vehicle 10 is stationary based on jerk instead of longitudinal acceleration, situations in which the vehicle 10 is stationary can be captured that might otherwise be missed.
As described above, examples of conditions that the vehicle stationary detection routine 72 can evaluate in order to determine whether the vehicle 10 is stationary include:
1. A value of jerk being less than a threshold value, preferably for at least a selected period of time,
2. A vehicle speed being less than a threshold speed, preferably for at least a selected period of time, and
3. The transmission 14 being determined to be in ‘Park’ (for automatic transmission) or in ‘Neutral’ with the brake depressed, preferably for at least a selected period of time (for manual transmission). The three aforementioned selected periods of time need not be the same as each other.
The vehicle straight driving detection routine 74 references the camera 20 (and one or more other sensors such as the steering angle sensor 28 and the speed sensor 30) to determine whether the vehicle 10 is driving straight (and therefore has an actual yaw rate of about zero) based on an analysis of images captured by the camera 20. In an embodiment, to determine whether the vehicle 10 is driving straight (such as driving in a straight path), the control system 18 detects any lane delimiters 32 present in the images. An example image is shown at 300 in
In order for the control system 18 to determine whether or not a lane delimiter 32 has been detected, it may assess the ‘quality’ of the data obtained from the camera images, such as, for example, whether the control system 18 has received sufficient image information to accurately determine the position and curvature of the lane delimiter 32. When the quality of the data does not meet the threshold quality, then the control system 18 determines that the data does not relate to a lane delimiter 32. Evaluation of lane delimiter quality may be performed by the control system 18, for example as part of the vehicle straight driving detection routine 74, or by a camera control system or lane-keeping system.
After detecting any lane delimiters 32, the control system 18 may be programmed to determine whether the detected lane delimiters 32 are generally straight. Each lane delimiter 32 may be modeled using a polynomial equation, such as a third-order polynomial equation. A curvature of the lane delimiter 32 may be obtained by taking a derivative of the polynomial equation. Coefficients of the terms of the derivative equation may be tested for linearity. A relatively small coefficient for a non-linear term (such as, for example, x2 or x3), when compared to a linear coefficient (such as, for example, x), can indicate a lane delimiter 32 of low curvature. Lane curvature may be determined by the controller 18, for example as part of the vehicle straight driving detection routine 74, or for example, by a camera controller or lane-keeping system.
For any lane delimiters 32 that are determined to be straight, the controller 18 may be programmed to determine the heading of the vehicle 10 relative to each generally straight lane delimiter 32. Thus, if there is only one lane delimiter 32 detected, and it is determined to be generally straight, the controller 18 may be programmed to determine the heading of the vehicle 10 relative to that lane delimiter 32. If there are two generally straight lane delimiters 32 detected the controller 18 may be programmed to determine the heading of the vehicle 10 relative to the first lane delimiter (such as, for example, lane delimiter 32a in
The heading of the vehicle may be determined by the controller 18 by any suitable method. For example, it may be determined using one or more of the steering angle sensor 28, the yaw rate sensor 22 and by analysis of the images from the camera 20. For example, the images from the camera 20 may be analyzed by the controller 18 to determine if, over time, any detected lane delimiters 32 are moving by more than a selected amount along the x-axis in the images. Such movement would be indicative that the vehicle 10 is not precisely parallel to the lane delimiters 32. The amount of such movement could be correlated to a relative angle between the vehicle 10 heading and the direction of the lane delimiters 32.
When the control system 18 determines that the vehicle 10 is sufficiently parallel to (such as, for example, within a selected number of degrees of) one or more generally straight lane delimiters 32 for at least a threshold duration of time (such as, for example, about 0.1 seconds), the vehicle straight driving detection routine 74 may update the yaw rate offset 78. To update the yaw rate offset 78, the control system 18 may obtain a measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor 22. This measured yaw rate may, for example, be used by the control system 18 directly as the new yaw rate offset 78 and may simply replace the previous yaw rate offset. Alternatively (and preferably), the new yaw rate offset 78 may be some selected proportion or percentage of the measured yaw rate added to some selected proportion or percentage of the previous yaw rate offset, as described in more detail below.
In addition to using the images from the camera 20, data from other sensors may be used by the control system 18 to determine whether the vehicle 10 is driving in a straight path. For example, the control system 18 may receive signals from the steering angle sensor 28 to determine whether the steering angle of the vehicle 10 is less than a selected threshold steering angle (such as, for example, approximately zero). Also, the speed sensor 30 will be used to determine that the vehicle 10 is in fact, moving (such as, for example, moving above a selected threshold speed).
It is advantageous to be able to determine the error (which may be referred to as the offset) of the yaw rate sensor 22 while driving (not just when the vehicle is stationary), since drift error can increase the error in yaw rate over time, and it is not always practical to wait until the vehicle stops to determine the yaw rate offset 78, especially during a long drive.
Using the camera 20 to detect lane delimiters 32 that are straight and to determine whether the vehicle heading is parallel with the lane delimiters 32 has advantages over other approaches, such as by relying solely on steering angle. This is because it is possible in some situations for the steering angle not to reflect the true heading of the vehicle 10. For example, if the road has a crown as many roads do, the vehicle may steer by some small amount towards the peak in order to drive straight. Similarly in a crosswind a driver may steer the vehicle into the crosswind by some small amount in order to maintain a straight heading on the road. Therefore, relying on steering angle may mask situations of straight driving that could have been used to determine yaw rate offset 78.
Even though the aforementioned examples describe situations in which the steering angle is not zero when the vehicle 10 heading is straight, the control system 18 may still compare the measured steering angle (such as, for example, from steering angle sensor 28) with a threshold steering angle as a condition for determining whether the vehicle 10 has some chance to be travelling straight before going on to carry out the detection and operations relating to the camera images. For example, the control system 18 may determine that the vehicle 10 has at least some chance of following a straight path if the steering angle if the vehicle is less than, for example, about 10 degrees angularly to the left or to the right, preferably for at least a selected period of time (such as, for example, about 5 seconds). Additionally the control system 18 can determine whether or not the rate of change of the steering angle exceeds a threshold rate of change of the steering angle (such as, for example, about 2 degrees per second), before permitting the control system 18 to analyze the camera images 20 for lane delimiters 32. Alternatively, the analysis of images from the camera 20 may be carried out simultaneously with the determinations made above relating to steering angle and the rate of change of the steering angle.
Even in situations where there are no lane delimiters detected, the control system 18 may still update the yaw rate offset 78 if, for example, the steering angle is sufficiently low and if the vehicle is moving.
The conditions that the vehicle straight driving detection routine 74 can evaluate in order to determine whether the vehicle 10 is moving straight are summarized as follows:
1. Detection of any straight lane delimiters 32 from images from the camera 20 for at least a selected duration,
2. A steering angle from the steering angle sensor 28 being less than a threshold angle for at least a selected duration,
3. A rate of change of steering angle from the steering angle sensor 28 being less than a threshold rate of change of angle for at least a selected duration, and
4. A vehicle speed from the speed sensor 30 being greater than a threshold speed for at least a selected duration.
When updating the yaw rate offset 78, it will be noted that the potential for error in determining that the vehicle 10 should have an actual yaw rate of zero varies depending on the specifics of each situation. For example, there is relatively less potential for error in a determination that the vehicle 10 is stationary than there is in a determination that the vehicle 10 is driving straight when only one lane delimiter 32 is detected by the camera 20. Depending on the potential for error associated with a particular updating of the yaw rate, the proportions of the measured yaw rate and the previous yaw rate offset that are added together to form the new yaw rate offset 78 can be adjusted. More specifically, when there is a relatively high potential for error in the measured offset (such as, for example, when the measured yaw rate is obtained when the vehicle is determined to be driving straight but where the control system 18 could not identify any lane delimiters), the new yaw rate offset 78 may be generated from a relatively small proportion (such as, for example, about 1 percent) of the measured yaw rate added to a relatively large proportion (such as, for example, about 99 percent) of the previous yaw rate offset. By contrast, when there is relatively less potential for error (such as, for example, when the measured yaw rate was obtained when the vehicle 10 is determined to be stationary), the new yaw rate offset 78 may be determined to be a relatively higher proportion (such as, for example, about 10 percent) of the measured yaw rate can be added to a relatively reduced proportion (such as, for example, about 90 percent) of the previous yaw rate offset.
Accordingly, the yaw rate offset filter routine 76 can apply the following offset update formula:
WOFFSET=K(0−WBUFFER)+(1−K)WOLD OFFSET
where:
WOFFSET is the new yaw rate offset 78 being determined;
K is the proportion of the measured yaw rate used to determine the new yaw rate offset 78;
(1−K) is the proportion of the previous yaw rate offset used to determine the new yaw rate offset 78;
WBUFFER is the measured yaw rate (e.g. obtained using one of the routines 72, 74); and
WOLD OFFSET is the previous yaw rate offset.
As can be seen, the proportion K defines a ratio by which the measured yaw rate obtained by one of the routines 72, 74 is combined with the stored yaw rate offset 78, the ratio being K/(1−K). For small values of K, the stored yaw rate offset 78 is thus less updated by the measured yaw rate obtained by one of the routines 72, 74. The proportion K can be considered to be a numerical expression of the level of confidence in the measured yaw rate obtained by one of the routines 72, 74 being an accurate value for the yaw rate offset 78. Combining the yaw rate obtained by one of the routines 72, 74 with the stored yaw rate offset 78 in such a way also serves as a time-based filter, so that error in the yaw rate obtained by one of the routines 72, 74 is mitigated and eventually eliminated by subsequent iterations. The proportion K may be set to zero to allow the stored yaw rate offset 78 to not be updated, or 1 to allow immediate and complete copy of the current yaw rate to the yaw rate offset 78. The yaw rate offset filter routine 76 may be understood to implement a low-pass filter, where the filter constant is the proportion K.
In this exemplary embodiment, the proportion K ranges from 0.01 to 0.10, giving ratios of 1:99 and 1:9 for the measured yaw rate (WBUFFER) obtained by one of the routines 72, 74 to the previous yaw rate offset 78 (WOLD OFFSET). The proportion K may be about 0.10 when the vehicle stationary detection routine 72 obtains the yaw rate to reflect a relatively high confidence in the accuracy of WBUFFER in such a situation. Continuing with this exemplary embodiment, when the vehicle straight driving detection routine 74 obtains the yaw rate, the proportion K may be somewhere in the range of about 0.01 to 0.04 depending on such factors as the number of straight lane delimiters that are detected. It will be understood that these are merely example values. Higher values for the proportion K mean that the yaw rate offset 78 will more quickly change, while lower offset correction values mean that the yaw rate offset 78 will change more slowly. The proportion K will be discussed in more detail below with respect to
Once the yaw rate offset filter routine 76 determines the new yaw rate offset 78, WOFFSET, the new yaw rate offset is stored in the memory 64 and becomes the stored yaw rate offset 78.
The routines 72, 74, 76 may be repeated to continually update the yaw rate offset 78. Using the yaw rate offset 78, the control system 18 can correct for error in signals from the yaw rate sensor 22. In other words, using the yaw rate offset 78, the control system 18 can receive a measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor 22 (which may be referred to as a second measured yaw rate to distinguish it from the measured yaw rate taken in the routines 72, 74 used to update the offset 78) and can apply the known offset 78 to it to arrive at a corrected yaw rate 80. When the control system 18 needs to determine the yaw rate for the vehicle 10 (such as, for example, for use by the collision mitigation system or the stability control system) the processor 62 can obtain a corrected yaw rate 80 by combining a new measured yaw rate sensed at the yaw rate sensor 22 (the aforementioned second measured yaw rate), with the yaw rate offset 78, as may be expressed by the following corrected yaw rate formula:
WCORRECTED=WINPUT+WOFFSET
where:
WCORRECTED is the corrected yaw rate 80 being determined;
WINPUT is the yaw rate obtained from the yaw rate sensor 22, and this may be a yaw rate stored in the buffer 82; and
WOFFSET is the yaw rate offset 78.
The corrected yaw rate 80 may be stored in the memory 64 or output at the input/output interface 66, as needed.
At step 102, the method is initialized. The buffer 82 may be cleared and then filled with raw yaw rate input from the yaw rate sensor 22.
At step 104, the input yaw rates from the sensor 22 may be filtered to reduce the effects of noise. Spurious values may be ignored. Any suitable filter may be used. Step 104 may be performed after the buffer 82 is filled or while the buffer 82 is being filled during step 102. The result of steps 102 and 104 is a filtered input yaw rate that will be used by the remainder of the method 100.
At step 106, it is determined whether the vehicle 10 is stationary for a sufficient duration, as described above. If it is determined at step 106 that the vehicle 10 is stationary, the value of the proportion K is set to be equal to K4 at step 108. K4 may, for example, be 0.1, which reflects a relatively high degree of confidence that the vehicle 10 is in fact stationary (and therefore has a true yaw rate of about zero).
At step 110, the yaw rate offset 78 is updated as described above, using the formulas described above. At step 112, the corrected yaw rate 80 is determined using the formula provided above.
When it is determined at step 106 that the vehicle is not stationary, step 114 is carried out. At step 114, it is determined whether the vehicle 10 is moving straight. To that end, one or more of the following conditions may be evaluated:
the steering angle meeting related criteria such as whether the steering angle is about +/−10 degrees of a zero steering angle for a selected period of time, and a vehicle speed meeting related criteria such as whether the vehicle speed is greater than a minimum acceptable speed (such as, for example, about 10 kph, or for example, about 60 kph) for a selected (optionally different) period of time;
the differential speeds of the wheels 12 on the right side of the vehicle vs. the left side of the vehicle being below a selected threshold differential speed;
data from an onboard GPS system meeting selected criteria that indicate that the vehicle is driving straight.
Step 114 is a coarse determination of whether the vehicle 10 is moving in a straight path. When it is determined that the vehicle 10 is not stationary at step 106 and is not moving in a straight path, it is determined that the yaw rate offset 78 is not to be updated at step 116 and as a result the yaw rate offset 78 is not updated, and the method 100 can proceed to step 112 to determine a corrected yaw rate 80 by referencing the previously obtained yaw rate offset 78.
If, on the other hand, at step 114 it is determined that the vehicle 10 is moving relatively straight, then the control system 18 analyzes images from the camera 20 to determine how many lane straight delimiters can be detected.
At steps 118 and 122, one or more images from the environment outside the vehicle 10 are captured by the camera 20 and the control system 18 performs image analysis to detect and evaluate lane delimiters in the images. This may be part of an ongoing lane-keeping process or may be a process that is only performed when yaw rate offset 78 is being determined by the method 100.
If at step 118 no lane delimiters are found to be acceptable (such as of sufficient quality and of sufficient straightness, optionally for a sufficient period of time), then the proportion K is set to be equal to offset correction value K1 at step 120 and the yaw rate offset 78 is updated accordingly. If at steps 118 and 122 one lane delimiter (32a or 32b) is found to be acceptable, but not two lane delimiters (32a and 32b), then the proportion K is set to be equal to offset correction value K2 at step 124 and the yaw rate offset 78 is updated accordingly. If at step 122 two lane delimiters are found to be acceptable, then the proportion K is set to be equal to offset correction value K3 at step 126 and the yaw rate offset 78 is updated accordingly. As noted above, K1 may be less than K2, which may be less than K3, which may be less than K4. Exemplary values for K1, K2 and K3 may comprise about 0.02, 0.03 and 0.04, respectively.
At step 118, if no acceptable lane delimiter is detected, or if one or more lane delimiters are detected, but did not remain detected for a sufficient period of time then step 120 is performed to select the offset correction value K1 corresponding to a first level of confidence that the vehicle 10 is moving straight based on the conditions met at step 114. If one acceptable lane delimiter (such as either the left lane delimiter 32a or the right lane delimiter 32b in
The first and second durations may be of different lengths or the same length, and may be coincident times, partially overlapping times or separate times. Steps 118 and 122 may be performed at the same time by the same process, and are merely described as separate for clarity.
In relation to the above-described routines 72-76, the method 100 may be understood as follows. Steps 106 and 108 correspond to the vehicle stationary detection routine 72. Steps 114, 118, 120, 122, 124, and 126 correspond to the vehicle straight driving detection routine 74. Step 110 corresponds to the yaw rate offset filter routine 76.
When steps 102, 104, 106, 114, 116, and 112 are performed in that sequence, the vehicle 10 is not being operated in a manner conducive to updating the previously obtained yaw rate offset 78 and corrected yaw rates 80 are being determined using the previously obtained yaw rate offset.
The steps of the method 100 may be performed in orders different from that described. Any of the steps may be split into two or more smaller steps. Any two or more of the steps may be combined into a larger step. Steps may be omitted.
It will be understood that the use of variable values for the proportion K may be advantageous regardless of the specific details of the routines that are used to determine the new yaw rate offset 78. In other words it is contemplated to be advantageous to assign different values for the proportion K based on a set of different situations determined to be conducive for updating the value of the yaw rate offset 78, wherein the different situations have different levels of confidence associated therewith.
The techniques described herein may be repeated while the vehicle 10 is being operated in order to continually determine whether conditions are suitable for updating the yaw rate offset 78. Such repetition can occur according to a period, such as 10 ms, 50 ms, or 100 ms, and such period may be allowed to vary, such as by about +/−50 percent or thereabouts.
Thus, the present invention may comprise a system for determining a corrected yaw rate of a land-based vehicle, with the system comprising a yaw rate sensor, a camera and a processor. The camera is configured to be mounted to the vehicle and operable to capture image data representative of the environment exterior of the vehicle. The processor is operable to:
(a) process image data captured by the camera;
(b) determine if the vehicle is moving and has a zero yaw rate at least based on processing of captured image data;
(c) obtain a first measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor when the vehicle is determined in step (b) to be moving and to have a zero yaw rate;
(d) determine a yaw rate offset based at least in part on the measured yaw rate obtained in step (c);
(e) obtain a second measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor; and
(f) determine a corrected yaw rate for the vehicle based on the second measured yaw rate and the yaw rate offset.
Optionally, the processor may be operable in step (b) to (g) determine at least from processing of captured image data that the vehicle is driving straight. The processor may be operable in step (b) to:
(h) detect any lane delimiters present in the exterior scene represented by captured image data;
(i) determine whether any lane delimiters detected in step (h) are qualifying lane delimiters which meet selected criteria; and
(j) compare a heading of the vehicle with the direction of at least one qualifying lane delimiter.
Optionally, when there are two qualifying lane delimiters, the processor may be operable in step (j) to compare a heading of the vehicle with the direction of the two qualifying lane delimiters. Optionally, the processor may be operable in step (i) to determine whether the amount of curvature in any lane delimiters detected in step (h) is below a selected threshold amount of curvature. Optionally, the processor may be operable in step (i) to determine whether any lane delimiters detected in step (h) have been detected for more than a selected duration.
Optionally, the yaw rate offset may be a first selected proportion of the first measured yaw rate obtained in step (c) and a second selected proportion of a previous yaw rate offset, and wherein the first and second selected proportions are selected based at least in part on how many lane delimiters meet the selected criteria.
Optionally, the processor may be operable in step (b) to determine whether a steering angle of the vehicle is less than a selected threshold steering angle. Optionally, the processor may be operable in step (b) to determine whether the speed of the vehicle is greater than a selected threshold speed. Optionally, the processor may be operable in step (b) to determine whether the steering angle of the vehicle is approximately zero.
Optionally, the yaw rate offset may be a first selected proportion of the first measured yaw rate obtained in step (c) and a second selected proportion of a previous yaw rate offset.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a system for determining a corrected yaw rate for a yaw rate sensor on a land-based vehicle comprises an accelerometer operable to sense a longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle and a processor connected to the yaw rate sensor and the accelerometer, with the processor operable to:
(a) obtain an acceleration from an accelerometer positioned to sense a longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle;
(b) determine a rate of change of the acceleration;
(c) carry out a determination of a yaw rate offset based at least in part on a first measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor, at least in part depending on whether the rate of change of the acceleration determined in step (b) is approximately zero;
(d) obtain a second measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor; and
(e) determine a corrected yaw rate for the vehicle based on the second measured yaw rate and the yaw rate offset.
The processor may be operable to carry out step (c) depending at least in part on whether the rate of change of the acceleration determined in step (b) is approximately zero for a selected duration. The processor may be operable to carry out step (c) depending in part on a determination of whether the vehicle has a speed that is approximately zero.
Optionally, the yaw rate offset is a first selected proportion of the measured yaw rate obtained in step (c) and a second selected proportion of a previous yaw rate offset.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a system for determining a corrected yaw rate for a yaw rate sensor on a land-based vehicle comprises a memory and a processor connected to the yaw rate sensor and the memory, with the processor operable to:
(a) determine whether the vehicle has a yaw rate of zero;
(b) obtain a first measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor depending on the determination made in step (a);
(c) determine a yaw rate offset that is a first selected proportion of the first measured yaw rate obtained in step (b) and a second selected proportion of a previous yaw rate offset, wherein the first selected proportion and the second selected proportion are selected based on a set of criteria based on data determined from the at least one other sensor;
(d) obtain a second measured yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor; and
(e) determine a corrected yaw rate for the vehicle based on the second measured yaw rate and the yaw rate offset.
The data may include a derivative of longitudinal acceleration for the vehicle and wherein the set of criteria includes whether the derivative of the longitudinal acceleration for the vehicle is approximately zero. The ratio of the first and second selected proportions may vary between about 1:99 and about 1:9. The at least one sensor may include a vehicle-mounted camera and the data may include image data captured by the vehicle-mounted camera and representative of the environment exterior of the vehicle. The set of criteria may include the number of lane delimiters detected in the image data.
Optionally, and desirably, the system of the present invention utilizes an image-based sensor or camera and image processing of image data captured by the camera. The system and/or camera of the vehicle includes an image processor operable to process image data captured by the camera or cameras, such as for detecting objects or other vehicles or pedestrians or the like in the field of view of one or more of the cameras. For example, the image processor may comprise an EyeQ2 or EyeQ3 image processing chip available from Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. of Jerusalem, Israel, and may include object detection software (such as the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,855,755; 7,720,580; and/or 7,038,577, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties), and may analyze image data to detect vehicles and/or other objects. Responsive to such image processing, and when an object or other vehicle is detected, the system may generate an alert to the driver of the vehicle and/or may generate an overlay at the displayed image to highlight or enhance display of the detected object or vehicle, in order to enhance the driver's awareness of the detected object or vehicle or hazardous condition during a driving maneuver of the equipped vehicle.
The camera or imager or imaging sensor may comprise any suitable camera or imager or sensor. Optionally, the camera may comprise a “smart camera” that includes the imaging sensor array and associated circuitry and image processing circuitry and electrical connectors and the like as part of a camera module, such as by utilizing aspects of the vision systems described in PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/066571, filed Nov. 27, 2012, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The vehicle may include any type of sensor or sensors, such as imaging sensors or radar sensors or lidar sensors or ladar sensors or ultrasonic sensors or the like. The imaging sensor or camera may capture image data for image processing and may comprise any suitable camera or sensing device, such as, for example, an array of a plurality of photosensor elements arranged in at least about 640 columns and 480 rows (at least about a 640×480 imaging array), with a respective lens focusing images onto respective portions of the array. The photosensor array may comprise a plurality of photosensor elements arranged in a photosensor array having rows and columns. The logic and control circuit of the imaging sensor may function in any known manner, and the image processing and algorithmic processing may comprise any suitable means for processing the images and/or image data. For example, the vision system and/or processing and/or camera and/or circuitry may utilize aspects described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,005,974; 5,760,962; 5,877,897; 5,796,094; 5,949,331; 6,222,447; 6,302,545; 6,396,397; 6,498,620; 6,523,964; 6,611,202; 6,201,642; 6,690,268; 6,717,610; 6,757,109; 6,802,617; 6,806,452; 6,822,563; 6,891,563; 6,946,978; 7,859,565; 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 6,636,258; 7,145,519; 7,161,616; 7,230,640; 7,248,283; 7,295,229; 7,301,466; 7,592,928; 7,881,496; 7,720,580; 7,038,577; 6,882,287; 5,929,786 and/or 5,786,772, PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/047256, filed Aug. 31, 2010 and published Mar. 10, 2011 as International Publication No. WO 2011/028686 and/or International Publication No. WO 2010/099416, published Sep. 2, 2010, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US10/25545, filed Feb. 26, 2010 and published Sep. 2, 2010 as International Publication No. WO 2010/099416, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/048800, filed Jul. 30, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/048110, filed Jul. 25, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/CA2012/000378, filed Apr. 25, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/056014, filed Sep. 19, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US12/57007, filed Sep. 25, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/061548, filed Oct. 24, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/062906, filed Nov. 1, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/063520, filed Nov. 5, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/064980, filed Nov. 14, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/066570, filed Nov. 27, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/066571, filed Nov. 27, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/068331, filed Dec. 7, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/071219, filed Dec. 21, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/022119, filed Jan. 18, 2013, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/027342, filed Feb. 22, 2013, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/681,963, filed Nov. 20, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,264,673; Ser. No. 13/660,306, filed Oct. 25, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,146,898; Ser. No. 13/653,577, filed Oct. 17, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,174,574; and/or Ser. No. 13/534,657, filed Jun. 27, 2012 and published Jan. 3, 2013 as U.S. Publication No. US-2013-0002873, and/or U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 61/736,104, filed Dec. 12, 2012; Ser. No. 61/736,103, filed Dec. 12, 2012; Ser. No. 61/735,314, filed Dec. 10, 2012; Ser. No. 61/734,457, filed Dec. 7, 2012; Ser. No. 61/733,598, filed Dec. 5, 2012; Ser. No. 61/733,093, filed Dec. 4, 2012; Ser. No. 61/727,912, filed Nov. 19, 2012; Ser. No. 61/727,911, filed Nov. 19, 2012; Ser. No. 61/727,910, filed Nov. 19, 2012; Ser. No. 61/718,382, filed Oct. 25, 2012; Ser. No. 61/710,924, filed Oct. 8, 2012; Ser. No. 61/696,416, filed Sep. 4, 2012; Ser. No. 61/682,995, filed Aug. 14, 2012; Ser. No. 61/682,486, filed Aug. 13, 2012; Ser. No. 61/680,883, filed Aug. 8, 2012; Ser. No. 61/676,405, filed Jul. 27, 2012; Ser. No. 61/666,146, filed Jun. 29, 2012; Ser. No. 61/648,744, filed May 18, 2012; Ser. No. 61/624,507, filed Apr. 16, 2012; Ser. No. 61/616,126, filed Mar. 27, 2012; Ser. No. 61/613,651, filed Mar. 21, 2012; and/or Ser. No. 61/607,229, filed Mar. 6, 2012, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The system may communicate with other communication systems via any suitable means, such as by utilizing aspects of the systems described in PCT Application No. PCT/US10/038477, filed Jun. 14, 2010, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/202,005, filed Aug. 17, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,126,525, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The imaging device and control and image processor and any associated illumination source, if applicable, may comprise any suitable components, and may utilize aspects of the cameras and vision systems described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,877,897; 6,498,620; 5,670,935; 5,796,094; 6,396,397; 6,806,452; 6,690,268; 7,005,974; 7,123,168; 7,004,606; 6,946,978; 7,038,577; 6,353,392; 6,320,176; 6,313,454; and 6,824,281, and/or International Publication No. WO 2010/099416, published Sep. 2, 2010, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US10/47256, filed Aug. 31, 2010 and published Mar. 10, 2011 as International Publication No. WO 2011/028686, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/508,840, filed Jul. 24, 2009, and published Jan. 28, 2010 as U.S. Pat. Publication No. US 2010-0020170, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/048110, filed Jul. 25, 2012, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/534,657, filed Jun. 27, 2012 and published Jan. 3, 2013 as U.S. Publication No. US-2013-0002873, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The camera or cameras may comprise any suitable cameras or imaging sensors or camera modules, and may utilize aspects of the cameras or sensors described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/091,359, filed Apr. 24, 2008 and published Oct. 1, 2009 as U.S. Publication No. US-2009-0244361, and/or Ser. No. 13/260,400, filed Sep. 26, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,451, and/or U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,965,336 and/or 7,480,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The imaging array sensor may comprise any suitable sensor, and may utilize various imaging sensors or imaging array sensors or cameras or the like, such as a CMOS imaging array sensor, a CCD sensor or other sensors or the like, such as the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 5,760,962; 5,715,093; 5,877,897; 6,922,292; 6,757,109; 6,717,610; 6,590,719; 6,201,642; 6,498,620; 5,796,094; 6,097,023; 6,320,176; 6,559,435; 6,831,261; 6,806,452; 6,396,397; 6,822,563; 6,946,978; 7,339,149; 7,038,577; 7,004,606; and/or 7,720,580, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/534,632, filed May 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,965,336; and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/076022, filed Sep. 11, 2008 and published Mar. 19, 2009 as International Publication No. WO/2009/036176, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/078700, filed Oct. 3, 2008 and published Apr. 9, 2009 as International Publication No. WO/2009/046268, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The camera module and circuit chip or board and imaging sensor may be implemented and operated in connection with various vehicular vision-based systems, and/or may be operable utilizing the principles of such other vehicular systems, such as a vehicle headlamp control system, such as the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,796,094; 6,097,023; 6,320,176; 6,559,435; 6,831,261; 7,004,606; 7,339,149; and/or 7,526,103, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a rain sensor, such as the types disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,392; 6,313,454; 6,320,176; and/or 7,480,149, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a vehicle vision system, such as a forwardly, sidewardly or rearwardly directed vehicle vision system utilizing principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,670,935; 5,760,962; 5,877,897; 5,949,331; 6,222,447; 6,302,545; 6,396,397; 6,498,620; 6,523,964; 6,611,202; 6,201,642; 6,690,268; 6,717,610; 6,757,109; 6,802,617; 6,806,452; 6,822,563; 6,891,563; 6,946,978; and/or 7,859,565, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a trailer hitching aid or tow check system, such as the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,005,974, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, a reverse or sideward imaging system, such as for a lane change assistance system or lane departure warning system or for a blind spot or object detection system, such as imaging or detection systems of the types disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,720,580; 7,038,577; 5,929,786 and/or 5,786,772, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/239,980, filed Sep. 30, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,496, and/or U.S. provisional applications Ser. No. 60/628,709, filed Nov. 17, 2004; Ser. No. 60/614,644, filed Sep. 30, 2004; Ser. No. 60/618,686, filed Oct. 14, 2004; Ser. No. 60/638,687, filed Dec. 23, 2004, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a video device for internal cabin surveillance and/or video telephone function, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,760,962; 5,877,897; 6,690,268; and/or 7,370,983, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/538,724, filed Jun. 13, 2005 and published Mar. 9, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0050018, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, a traffic sign recognition system, a system for determining a distance to a leading or trailing vehicle or object, such as a system utilizing the principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,396,397 and/or 7,123,168, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, and/or the like.
Optionally, the circuit board or chip may include circuitry for the imaging array sensor and or other electronic accessories or features, such as by utilizing compass-on-a-chip or EC driver-on-a-chip technology and aspects such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,255,451 and/or U.S. Pat. No. 7,480,149; and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/226,628, filed Sep. 14, 2005 and published Mar. 23, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0061008, and/or Ser. No. 12/578,732, filed Oct. 14, 2009 and published Apr. 22, 2010 as U.S. Publication No. US-2010-0097469, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Optionally, the vision system may include a display for displaying images captured by one or more of the imaging sensors for viewing by the driver of the vehicle while the driver is normally operating the vehicle. Optionally, for example, the vision system may include a video display device disposed at or in the interior rearview mirror assembly of the vehicle, such as by utilizing aspects of the video mirror display systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,690,268 and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/333,337, filed Dec. 21, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,264,672, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The video mirror display may comprise any suitable devices and systems and optionally may utilize aspects of the compass display systems described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,370,983; 7,329,013; 7,308,341; 7,289,037; 7,249,860; 7,004,593; 4,546,551; 5,699,044; 4,953,305; 5,576,687; 5,632,092; 5,677,851; 5,708,410; 5,737,226; 5,802,727; 5,878,370; 6,087,953; 6,173,508; 6,222,460; 6,513,252; and/or 6,642,851, and/or European patent application, published Oct. 11, 2000 under Publication No. EP 0 1043566, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/226,628, filed Sep. 14, 2005 and published Mar. 23, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0061008, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Optionally, the video mirror display screen or device may be operable to display images captured by a rearward viewing camera of the vehicle during a reversing maneuver of the vehicle (such as responsive to the vehicle gear actuator being placed in a reverse gear position or the like) to assist the driver in backing up the vehicle, and optionally may be operable to display the compass heading or directional heading character or icon when the vehicle is not undertaking a reversing maneuver, such as when the vehicle is being driven in a forward direction along a road (such as by utilizing aspects of the display system described in PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/056295, filed Oct. 14, 2011 and published Apr. 19, 2012 as International Publication No. WO 2012/051500, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).
Optionally, the vision system (utilizing the forward facing camera and a rearward facing camera and other cameras disposed at the vehicle with exterior fields of view) may be part of or may provide a display of a top-down view or birds-eye view system of the vehicle or a surround view at the vehicle, such as by utilizing aspects of the vision systems described in PCT Application No. PCT/US10/25545, filed Feb. 26, 2010 and published on Sep. 2, 2010 as International Publication No. WO 2010/099416, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US10/47256, filed Aug. 31, 2010 and published Mar. 10, 2011 as International Publication No. WO 2011/028686, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/062834, filed Dec. 1, 2011 and published Jun. 7, 2012 as International Publication No. WO 2012/075250, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/048993, filed Jul. 31, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US11/62755, filed Dec. 1, 2011 and published Jun. 7, 2012 as International Publication No. WO 2012-075250, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/CA2012/000378, filed Apr. 25, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/066571, filed Nov. 27, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/068331, filed Dec. 7, 2012, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/022119, filed Jan. 18, 2013, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/333,337, filed Dec. 21, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,264,672, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Optionally, a video mirror display may be disposed rearward of and behind the reflective element assembly and may comprise a display such as the types disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,530,240; 6,329,925; 7,855,755; 7,626,749; 7,581,859; 7,446,650; 7,370,983; 7,338,177; 7,274,501; 7,255,451; 7,195,381; 7,184,190; 5,668,663; 5,724,187 and/or 6,690,268, and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/091,525, filed Apr. 25, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,755; Ser. No. 11/226,628, filed Sep. 14, 2005 and published Mar. 23, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0061008; and/or Ser. No. 10/538,724, filed Jun. 13, 2005 and published Mar. 9, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0050018, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The display is viewable through the reflective element when the display is activated to display information. The display element may be any type of display element, such as a vacuum fluorescent (VF) display element, a light emitting diode (LED) display element, such as an organic light emitting diode (OLED) or an inorganic light emitting diode, an electroluminescent (EL) display element, a liquid crystal display (LCD) element, a video screen display element or backlit thin film transistor (TFT) display element or the like, and may be operable to display various information (as discrete characters, icons or the like, or in a multi-pixel manner) to the driver of the vehicle, such as passenger side inflatable restraint (PSIR) information, tire pressure status, and/or the like. The mirror assembly and/or display may utilize aspects described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,184,190; 7,255,451; 7,446,924 and/or 7,338,177, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The thicknesses and materials of the coatings on the substrates of the reflective element may be selected to provide a desired color or tint to the mirror reflective element, such as a blue colored reflector, such as is known in the art and such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,910,854; 6,420,036; and/or 7,274,501, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Optionally, the display or displays and any associated user inputs may be associated with various accessories or systems, such as, for example, a tire pressure monitoring system or a passenger air bag status or a garage door opening system or a telematics system or any other accessory or system of the mirror assembly or of the vehicle or of an accessory module or console of the vehicle, such as an accessory module or console of the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,289,037; 6,877,888; 6,824,281; 6,690,268; 6,672,744; 6,386,742; and 6,124,886, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/538,724, filed Jun. 13, 2005 and published Mar. 9, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0050018, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
While the foregoing provides certain non-limiting example embodiments, it should be understood that combinations, subsets, and variations of the foregoing are contemplated. The monopoly sought is defined by the claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/499,784, filed Sep. 29, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,346,468, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/246,495, filed Apr. 7, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,849,495, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/779,881, filed Feb. 28, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,694,224, which claims the filing benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/605,516, filed Mar. 1, 2012, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4720790 | Miki et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4987357 | Masaki | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4991054 | Walters | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5001558 | Burley et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5003288 | Wilhelm | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5012082 | Watanabe | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5016977 | Baude et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5027001 | Torbert | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027200 | Petrossian et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5044706 | Chen | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5055668 | French | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059877 | Teder | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5064274 | Alten | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5072154 | Chen | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5073012 | Lynam | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5076673 | Lynam et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5086253 | Lawler | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5096287 | Kakinami et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5097362 | Lynas | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5115346 | Lynam | May 1992 | A |
| 5121200 | Choi | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5124549 | Michaels et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5130709 | Toyama et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5148014 | Lynam | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151816 | Varaprasad et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5168378 | Black | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5170374 | Shimohigashi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5172235 | Wilm et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5177685 | Davis et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5182502 | Slotkowski et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5184956 | Langlais et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5189561 | Hong | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5193000 | Lipton et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193029 | Schofield | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5204778 | Bechtel | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5208701 | Maeda | May 1993 | A |
| 5245422 | Borcherts et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5253109 | O'Farrell | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5255442 | Schierbeek et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5276389 | Levers | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5285060 | Larson et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5289182 | Brillard et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5289321 | Secor | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5305012 | Faris | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5307136 | Saneyoshi | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5309137 | Kajiwara | May 1994 | A |
| 5313072 | Vachss | May 1994 | A |
| 5325096 | Pakett | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5325386 | Jewell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5329206 | Slotkowski et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5331312 | Kudoh | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5336980 | Levers | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5341437 | Nakayama | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5351044 | Mathur et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5355118 | Fukuhara | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5374852 | Parkes | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5386285 | Asayama | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5394333 | Kao | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5406395 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5406414 | O'Farrell et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410346 | Saneyoshi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5414257 | Stanton | May 1995 | A |
| 5414461 | Kishi et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5416313 | Larson et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5416318 | Hegyi | May 1995 | A |
| 5416478 | Morinaga | May 1995 | A |
| 5424952 | Asayama | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5426294 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5430431 | Nelson | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434407 | Bauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5440428 | Hegg et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444478 | Lelong et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5451822 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5457493 | Leddy et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5461357 | Yoshioka et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5461361 | Moore | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5469298 | Suman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5471515 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5475494 | Nishida et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5497306 | Pastrick | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5498866 | Bendicks et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5500766 | Stonecypher | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5510983 | Iino | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5515448 | Nishitani | May 1996 | A |
| 5521633 | Nakajima et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5528698 | Kamei et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5529138 | Shaw et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530240 | Larson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530420 | Tsuchiya et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5535314 | Alves et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5537003 | Bechtel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539397 | Asanuma et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541590 | Nishio | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550677 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555555 | Sato et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5568027 | Teder | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5574443 | Hsieh | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5581464 | Woll et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5594222 | Caldwell | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5610756 | Lynam et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614788 | Mullins | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5619370 | Guinosso | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5632092 | Blank et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5634709 | Iwama | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5642299 | Hardin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5648835 | Uzawa | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5650944 | Kise | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5660454 | Mori et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661303 | Teder | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5666028 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670935 | Schofield et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677851 | Kingdon et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5699044 | Van Lente et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5724316 | Brunts | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5732379 | Eckert et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737226 | Olson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5760828 | Cortes | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5760931 | Saburi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5760962 | Schofield et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761094 | Olson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765116 | Wilson-Jones et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765118 | Fukatani | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5781437 | Wiemer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5786772 | Schofield et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790403 | Nakayama | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790973 | Blaker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5793308 | Rosinski et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5793420 | Schmidt | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796094 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5835255 | Miles | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837994 | Stam et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844505 | Van Ryzin | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5844682 | Kiyomoto et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5845000 | Breed et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848802 | Breed et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850176 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850254 | Takano et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867591 | Onda | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5877707 | Kowalick | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5877897 | Schofield et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5878357 | Sivashankar et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5878370 | Olson | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5883739 | Ashihara et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884212 | Lion | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5890021 | Onoda | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5896085 | Mori et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5899956 | Chan | May 1999 | A |
| 5915800 | Hiwatashi et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5923027 | Stam et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5924212 | Domanski | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5929786 | Schofield et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5949331 | Schofield et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959555 | Furuta | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5963247 | Banitt | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5986796 | Miles | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990469 | Bechtel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990649 | Nagao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6020704 | Buschur | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6049171 | Stam et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6066933 | Ponziana | May 2000 | A |
| 6084519 | Coulling et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097023 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6097024 | Stam et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6144022 | Tenenbaum et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6175300 | Kendrick | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178034 | Allemand et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6198409 | Schofield et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6222447 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223114 | Boros et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6227689 | Miller | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6250148 | Lynam | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6266082 | Yonezawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266442 | Laumeyer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6285393 | Shimoura et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294989 | Schofield et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6297781 | Turnbull et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6302545 | Schofield et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310611 | Caldwell | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6317057 | Lee | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6320176 | Schofield et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6320282 | Caldwell | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6333759 | Mazzilli | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6341523 | Lynam | Jan 2002 | B2 |
| 6353392 | Schofield et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6370329 | Teuchert | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6392315 | Jones et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6420975 | DeLine et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6424273 | Gutta et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430303 | Naoi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442465 | Breed et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6477464 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6497503 | Dassanayake et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6498620 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6516664 | Lynam | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6523964 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6539306 | Turnbull | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6547133 | DeVries, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553130 | Lemelson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6559435 | Schofield et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6574033 | Chui et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6589625 | Kothari et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6594583 | Ogura et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6611202 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6611610 | Stam et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6636258 | Strumolo | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6650455 | Miles | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6672731 | Schnell et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6674562 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6678614 | McCarthy et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6680792 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6690268 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6700605 | Toyoda et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6704621 | Stein et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6710908 | Miles et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6711474 | Treyz et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6714331 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6717610 | Bos et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6735506 | Breed et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6741377 | Miles | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6744353 | Sjönell | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757109 | Bos | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6762867 | Lippert et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6794119 | Miles | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795221 | Urey | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6802617 | Schofield et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6806452 | Bos et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6819231 | Berberich et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822563 | Bos et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823241 | Shirato et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6824281 | Schofield et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6831261 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6882287 | Schofield | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6889161 | Winner et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6891563 | Schofield et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6909753 | Meehan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6946978 | Schofield | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953253 | Schofield et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6968736 | Lynam | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6975775 | Rykowski et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6989736 | Berberich et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7004606 | Schofield | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7005974 | McMahon et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7038577 | Pawlicki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7062300 | Kim | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7065432 | Moisel et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7079017 | Lang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7085637 | Breed et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7092548 | Laumeyer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7111968 | Bauer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7116246 | Winter et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7123168 | Schofield | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7145519 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149613 | Stam et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7161616 | Okamoto et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7167796 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7195381 | Lynam et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7202776 | Breed | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7205904 | Schofield | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7227459 | Bos et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7227611 | Hull et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7311406 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7325934 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7325935 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7338177 | Lynam | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7339149 | Schofield et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7344261 | Schofield et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7355524 | Schofield | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7370983 | De Wind et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7380948 | Schofield et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7388182 | Schofield et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7402786 | Schofield et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7423248 | Schofield et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7425076 | Schofield et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7446650 | Schofield et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7459664 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7460951 | Altan | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7480149 | DeWard et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7490007 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7492281 | Lynam et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7526103 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7561181 | Schofield et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7581859 | Lynam | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7592928 | Chinomi et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7616781 | Schofield et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7619508 | Lynam et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7639149 | Katoh | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7681960 | Wanke et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7720580 | Higgins-Luthman | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7777611 | Desai | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7881496 | Camilleri et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7914187 | Higgins-Luthman et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7965336 | Bingle et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8027029 | Lu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8058977 | Lynam | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8340866 | Hanzawa et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8694224 | Chundrlik, Jr. et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8849495 | Chundrik, Jr. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 9090234 | Johnson | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9092986 | Salomonsson | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9318020 | Salomonsson | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9327693 | Wolf | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9346468 | Chundrlik, Jr. et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9481301 | Schaffner | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9499139 | Koravadi | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 20020015153 | Downs | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020044065 | Quist et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020113873 | Williams | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159270 | Lynam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030137586 | Lewellen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156015 | Winner | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030222982 | Hamdan et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030227777 | Schofield | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040012488 | Schofield | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016870 | Pawlicki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040032321 | McMahon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040051634 | Schofield et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114381 | Salmeen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128065 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040200948 | Bos et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050078389 | Kulas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134966 | Burgner | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134983 | Lynam | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050146792 | Schofield et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169003 | Lindahl et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195488 | McCabe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050200700 | Schofield et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050232469 | Schofield et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050264891 | Uken et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060018511 | Stam et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060018512 | Stam et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028731 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060050018 | Hutzel et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060061008 | Karner et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060091813 | Stam et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103727 | Tseng | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060164230 | DeWind et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250501 | Wildmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060290479 | Akatsuka et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070023613 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070104476 | Yasutomi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109406 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109651 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109652 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109653 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109654 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070120657 | Schofield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070176080 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080180529 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20090113509 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090177347 | Breuer et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090243824 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090244361 | Gebauer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090295181 | Lawlor et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100020170 | Higgins-Luthman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100045797 | Schofield et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100097469 | Blank et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228437 | Hanzawa et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20120062743 | Lynam et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245817 | Cooprider et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120303222 | Cooprider et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130124052 | Hahne | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131918 | Hahne | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130231825 | Chundrlik, Jr. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160267725 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61605516 | Mar 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14499784 | Sep 2014 | US |
| Child | 15161709 | US | |
| Parent | 14246495 | Apr 2014 | US |
| Child | 14499784 | US | |
| Parent | 13779881 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Child | 14246495 | US |
