1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the fabrication of integrated circuits and electronic devices and, more particularly, to masking techniques and related structures.
2. Description of the Related Art
As a consequence of many factors, including demand for increased portability, computing power, memory capacity and energy efficiency, integrated circuits are constantly being reduced in size. The sizes of the constituent features that form the integrated circuits, e.g., electrical devices and interconnect lines, are also constantly being decreased to facilitate this size reduction.
The trend of decreasing feature size is evident, for example, in memory circuits or devices such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), flash memory, static random access memories (SRAMs), ferroelectric (FE) memories, etc. To take one example, DRAM typically includes millions or billions of identical circuit elements, known as memory cells. A memory cell typically consists of two electrical devices: a storage capacitor and an access field effect transistor. Each memory cell is an addressable location that may store one bit (binary digit) of data. A bit may be written to a cell through the transistor and may be read by sensing charge in the capacitor.
In another example, flash memory typically includes billions of flash memory cells containing floating gate field effect transistors that can retain a charge. The presence or absence of a charge in the floating gate determines the logic state of the memory cell. A bit may be written to a cell by injecting charge to or removing charge from a cell. Flash memory cells may be connected in different architecture configurations, each with different schemes for reading bits. In a “NOR” architecture configuration, each memory cell is coupled to a bit line and may be read individually. In a “NAND” architecture configuration, memory cells are aligned in a “string” of cells, and an entire bit line is activated to access data in one of the string of cells.
In general, by decreasing the sizes of the electrical devices that constitute a memory cell and the sizes of the conducting lines that access the memory cells, the memory devices may be made smaller. Additionally, storage capacities may be increased by fitting more memory cells on a given area in the memory devices.
The concept of pitch may be used to describe one aspect of the sizes of features in an integrated circuit such as a memory device. Pitch is defined as the distance between an identical point in two neighboring features, such as features in an array, which are typically arranged in a repeating pattern. These features are typically defined by spaces between adjacent features, which spaces are typically filled by a material, such as an insulator. As a result, pitch may be viewed as the sum of the width of a feature and of the width of the space on one side of the feature separating that feature from a neighboring feature. It will be appreciated that the spaces and features, such as lines, typically repeat to form a repetitive pattern of spacers and features.
Critical dimension (CD) is another term used to describe the sizes of features. The critical dimension is the smallest dimension of a feature in a particular circuit or masking scheme. Controlling the CD of certain structures, such as shallow trench isolation (STI) structures, during integrated circuit fabrication helps to facilitate the continued size reduction of integrated circuits by, e.g., ensuring predictable circuit performance.
The continual reduction in feature sizes places ever greater demands on the techniques used to form the features. For example, photolithography is commonly used to pattern features, such as conductive lines, in integrated circuit fabrication. However, due to factors such as optics, light or radiation wavelength and available photoresist materials, photolithography techniques may each have a minimum pitch or critical dimension below which a particular photolithographic technique cannot reliably form features. Thus, the inherent limitations of photolithographic techniques are obstacles to continued feature size reduction.
“Pitch doubling” or “pitch multiplication” is one proposed method for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch. A pitch multiplication method is illustrated in
While the pitch is actually halved in the example above, this reduction in pitch is conventionally referred to as pitch “doubling,” or, more generally, pitch “multiplication.” Thus, conventionally, “multiplication” of pitch by a certain factor actually involves reducing the pitch by that factor. The conventional terminology is retained herein.
While allowing for smaller critical dimensions and pitch, pitch multiplication faces continuing development as new challenges emerge, as the sizes of features in integrated circuits continue to decrease. Accordingly, there is a constant need for methods and structures for forming small features.
It will be appreciated that integrated circuits generally employ features of different sizes. For example, memory circuits typically contain arrays of memory cells located in one part of the circuits and logic circuits located in the so-called “periphery,” outside of the arrays. In the arrays, the memory cells are typically connected by conductive lines and, in the periphery, the conductive lines typically contact landing pads for connecting arrays to logic. Peripheral features such as landing pads, however, may be larger than the conductive lines. In addition, periphery electrical devices, including peripheral transistors, may be larger than the electrical devices in the array.
Pitch multiplication, however, is conventionally limited in its ability to form features of different sizes or shapes. For example, with reference to
To overcome such limitations, a non-pitch multiplied mask may be overlaid a pitch multiplied mask to form a combined mask. The combined mask has the benefit of tightly-spaced, pitch-multiplied features on one part of a mask and larger and/or more geometrically varied features on another part of the mask. To form the combined mask, pitch-multiplied mask features, such as spacers, are formed by pitch multiplication and a photoresist layer is deposited directly on and extending above the pitch-multiplied features. The photoresist layer may be patterned by photolithography to form the non-pitch multiplied mask pattern. Patterning the photoresist involves removing some of the photoresist extending on and over the spacers to expose the spacers, so that the part of the combined pattern defined by the spacers may later be transferred to a substrate.
It has been found, however, that positive photoresist may have difficulties forming combined mask patterns that are “clean.” To remove desired portions of the positive photoresist, those portions of the photoresist are exposed to light and then developed. Typically, the light exposure initiates a chemical reaction which facilitates photoresist removal during the development phase. Thus, to remove photoresist between spacers, or other pitch multiplied features, light is directed into the volume between those spacers. As the pitch of the spacers decrease, however, it becomes increasingly difficult for light to fully penetrate into that volume. For example, shadows cast by the spacers and the absorption of light by the photoresist itself may impede the penetration of the light. As a result, some residual positive photoresist may remain between spacers after development, leaving a mask which is not “clean”.
Increasing the intensity of the light has been found to be ineffective for removing the residual photoresist. For example, increasing the light intensity may cause undesired cross-linking of the photoresist, thereby forming a polymer that is difficult to remove. Moreover, this cross-linking may be more pronounced in the volume between spacers and can be especially pronounced when spacer CD's, and/or the width of the volume between spacers, are reduced below about 30 nm. For example, without being limited by theory, some spacers, such as silicon oxide spacers, may transmit and focus light. These spacers may locally increase the light intensity in some parts of the volume between the spacers. Thus, increasing the light intensity may increase, rather than decrease, the amount of residual photoresist present after exposure in an area which is desired to be open, and spacers may further increase the occurrence of cross-linking.
Embodiments of the invention allow for the formation of small features using a mask that is exceptionally clean, with lower levels of residual photoresist than a similar mask formed using positive resist. Embodiments of the invention utilize negative photoresist in combination with small or closely spaced features, including pitch-multiplied features such as spacers, to form the mask pattern. The pitch-multiplied features are formed over a desired area of a substrate, thereby forming a pitch-multiplied pattern. Negative photoresist is deposited over and between the spacers. The negative photoresist is patterned and, in some areas, may be removed from between the pitch-multiplied spacers, allowing a second pattern to be overlaid the pitch-multiplied pattern. The second pattern may be connected to or separated from the pitch-multiplied pattern. It will be appreciated that multiple pitch-multiplied patterns may be formed and the second pattern may be overlaid one or more of those pitch-multiplied patterns. Thus, in some embodiments, some small features may be formed having a pitch below the minimum pitch of a photolithographic method which is used to form other relatively large features.
The negative photoresist may be removed without exposure to light. As a result, the negative photoresist does not exhibit the problems associated with insufficient light penetration in the areas where photoresist removal is desired. Moreover, undesired cross-linking due to overexposure to light is prevented, since those areas are not exposed to light. Advantageously, embodiments of the invention allow the formation of clean masks using photoresist in combination with features having a pitch of about 100 nm or less or about 50 nm or less. In some embodiments, the CD's of the features can be about half the pitch or less, e.g., about 50 nm or less, or about 25 nm or less. It will be appreciated that using positive photoresist with such closely spaced features may result in relatively high levels of residue photoresist between the features. In addition, spacer materials, such as silicon oxide, which transmit and/or deflect the radiation used to pattern the photoresist, may be utilized without undesired focusing of the radiation causing crosslinking of the photoresist.
Reference will now be made to the Figures, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout. It will be appreciated that these Figures are not necessarily drawn to scale.
In a first phase of embodiments of the invention, mask features are formed by pitch multiplication.
With continued reference to
The materials for the layers 120-140 overlying the substrate 110 are chosen based upon consideration of the chemistry and process conditions for the various pattern forming and pattern transferring steps discussed herein. Because the layers between the topmost selectively definable layer 120 and the substrate 110 function to transfer a pattern derived from the selectively definable layer 120 to the substrate 110, the layers 130-140 between the selectively definable layer 120 and the substrate 110 are chosen so that they may be selectively etched relative to other exposed materials. It will be appreciated that a material is considered selectively, or preferentially, etched when the etch rate for that material is at least about 2-3 times greater, at least about 10 times greater, at least about 20 times greater, or at least about 40 times greater than that for surrounding materials. Because a goal of the layers 120-130 overlying the primary hard mask layer 140 is to allow well-defined patterns to be formed in that layer 140, it will be appreciated that one or more of the layers 120-130 may be omitted or substituted if suitable other materials, chemistries and/or process conditions are used. For example, where the substrate is relatively simple and may be selectively etched relative to the hard mask layer 130, the primary hard mask layer 140 may be omitted and patterns may be transferred directly to the substrate using the hard mask layer 130.
With continued reference to
In some embodiments, the material for the hard mask layer 130 comprises an inorganic material. Materials for the hard mask layer 130 include silicon oxide (SiO2), silicon or an anti-reflective coating (ARC), such as a silicon-rich silicon oxynitride, a silicon-rich nitride, or a film that has the desired etch selectivity relative to the spacers 175 or other exposed materials (
A combination of spin coated BARC over DARC can also be utilized. DARC can be deposited more conformally than BARC in some cases, thereby facilitating the formation of a planar surface for later photoresist deposition. BARC, however, can have superior properties in contact with photoresist. For example, photoresist features formed over BARC can have reduced “footing” (in which the part of the photoresist in contact with the BARC extends out laterally relative to the upper parts of the photoresist feature) relative to similar features formed over DARC.
With continued reference to
Embodiments of the invention may utilize a primary masking layer to facilitate pattern transfer to a substrate. As noted above, in common methods of transferring patterns, both the mask and the underlying substrate are exposed to etchant, which may wear away a mask before the pattern transfer is complete. These difficulties are exacerbated where the substrate comprises multiple different materials to be etched. Due to its excellent etch selectivity relative to a variety of materials, including oxides, nitrides and silicon, the primary masking layer may be formed of amorphous carbon, including transparent carbon.
It will be appreciated that the “substrate” to which patterns are transferred may include a layer of a single material, a plurality of layers of different materials, a layer or layers having regions of different materials or structures in them, etc. These materials may include semiconductors, insulators, conductors, or combinations thereof. For example, the substrate may comprise doped polysilicon, an electrical device active area, a silicide, or a metal layer, such as a tungsten, aluminum or copper layer, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the mask features discussed below may directly correspond to the desired placement of conductive features, such as interconnects, in the substrate. In other embodiments, the substrate may be an insulator and the location of mask features can correspond to the desired location of insulators, such as in damascene metallization. Examples of structures formed in the substrate in some embodiments include gate stacks and shallow trench isolation structures.
In addition to selecting appropriate materials for the various layers, the thicknesses of the layers 120-140 are chosen depending upon compatibility with the etch chemistries and process conditions described herein. As discussed above, when transferring a pattern from an overlying layer to an underlying layer by selectively etching the underlying layer, materials from both layers are removed to some degree. Thus, the upper layer is thick enough so that it is not worn away over the course of the pattern transfer.
In the illustrated embodiment, the photodefinable layer 120 is about 50-300 nm thick or about 200-250 nm thick for forming features with about 100 nm resolution or about 50-150 nm thick for forming features with about 50-70 nm resolution. It will be appreciated that, in cases where the layer 120 is a photoresist, this thickness may vary depending upon the wavelength of light used to pattern the layer 120. A thickness of about 50-300 nm thick or about 200-250 nm thick is particularly advantageous for 248 nm wavelength systems.
In the illustrated embodiment, the hard mask layer 130 is about 30-40 nm thick or about 20-30 nm thick. It will be appreciated that the thickness of the hard mask layer 130 can vary depending upon the selectivity of etches used to etch the hard mask layer 130 and neighboring layers, and depending upon photo-exposure conditions.
As discussed above, the thickness of the primary mask layer 140 is chosen based upon the selectivity of the etch chemistry for etching the substrate and based upon the materials and complexity of the substrate. It has been found that a thickness of about 100-400 nm or about 200-300 nm is effective for transferring patterns to a variety of substrates, including substrates having a plurality of different materials to be etched during the transfer. In some embodiments, for patterns with pattern features having critical dimensions of about 25 nm or less, the thickness of the primary mask layer 140 may be about 100-200 nm.
As an example of a substrate having a stack of layers,
The various layers discussed herein may be formed by various methods. For example, spin-on-coating processes may be used to form photodefinable layers. Various vapor deposition processes, such as chemical vapor deposition or atomic layer deposition, may be used to form hard mask layers. In some embodiments, the hard mask layer 130 is formed by low temperature deposition processes, performed at less than about 550° C. or at less than about 450° C. or at less than about 400° C. Processing at these low temperatures advantageously aids in maintaining the integrity of the primary masking layer 140, especially when that layer is formed of amorphous carbon. For example, undesirable ashing may occur if amorphous carbon is exposed to higher temperatures.
In addition, the amorphous carbon layers may be formed by chemical vapor deposition using a hydrocarbon compound, or mixtures of such compounds, as carbon precursors. Carbon precursors may include propylene, propyne, propane, butane, butylene, butadiene and acetelyne. A method for forming amorphous carbon layers is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,573,030 B1, issued to Fairbairn et al. on Jun. 3, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, the amorphous carbon is a form of amorphous carbon that is highly transparent to light and that offers further improvements for photo alignment by being transparent to the wavelengths of light used for such alignment. Deposition techniques for forming such transparent carbon can be found in A. Helmbold, D. Meissner, Thin Solid Films, 283 (1996) 196-203, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the amorphous carbon may be doped. A suitable method for forming doped amorphous carbon is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/652,174 to Yin et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
With reference to
The pitch of the resulting lines 124 is equal to the sum of the width of a line 124 and the width of a neighboring space 122. To minimize the critical dimensions of features formed using this pattern of lines 124 and spaces 122, the pitch may be at or near the limits of the photolithographic technique used to pattern the photodefinable layer 120. For example, for photolithography utilizing 248 nm light, the pitch of the lines 124 may be about 100 nm. Thus, the pitch may be at the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique and the spacer pattern discussed below may advantageously have a pitch below the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique. Alternatively, because the margin of error for position and feature size typically increases as the limits of a photolithographic technique are approached, the lines 124 may be formed having larger feature sizes, e.g., 200 nm or more, to minimize errors in the position and sizes of the lines 124.
As shown in
Next, with reference to
Methods for spacer material deposition include atomic layer deposition, e.g., using a self-limiting deposition with a silicon precursor and a subsequent exposure to an oxygen or nitrogen precursor to form silicon oxides and nitrides, respectively. In some embodiments, to form silicon oxide, a silicon halide, such as silicon hexachlorodisilane (HCD), is introduced in alternating pulses with an oxygen precursor, such as H2O. ALD can be performed at relatively low temperatures, e.g., under about 200° C. or under about 100° C., which has advantages for preventing thermal damage to underlying carbon-based materials, such as photoresist and amorphous carbon layers. In other embodiments, chemical vapor deposition is used to deposit the spacer material, e.g., using O3 and TEOS to form silicon oxide.
The thickness of the layer 170 is determined based upon the desired width of the spacers 175 (
With reference to
With reference to
Thus, pitch-multiplied mask features have been formed. In the illustrated embodiment, the pitch of the spacers 175 is roughly half that of the photoresist lines 124 and spaces 122 (
Next, in a second phase of methods according to embodiments of the invention, a second pattern is overlaid the first pattern 177. The second pattern may include features having larger widths than the first pattern 177. In addition, the second pattern may be formed completely, partially, or not overlapping the first pattern 177.
With reference to
With reference to
With continued reference to
While the pattern 177 has a pitch or feature size smaller than the minimum pitch or resolution of the photolithographic technique used in forming it, the pattern 230 typically has a pitch or feature size equal to or greater than the minimum pitch or resolution of the photolithographic technique used to form that pattern. It will be appreciated that the pattern 230 at the periphery 104 may be used to form landing pads, transistors, local interconnects, etc.
Next, in a third phase according to embodiment of the invention, the patterns 177 and 230 are transferred to a level below the spacers and simultaneously transferred to the substrate 110.
In any of the steps described herein, transferring a pattern from an overlying level to an underlying level involves forming features in the underlying level that generally correspond to features in the overlying level. For example, the path of lines in the underlying level will generally follow the path of lines in the overlying level and the location of other features in the underlying level will correspond to the location of similar features in the overlying level. The precise shapes and sizes of features may vary from the overlying level to the underlying level, however. For example, depending upon etch chemistries and conditions, the sizes of and relative spacings between the features forming the transferred pattern may be enlarged or diminished relative to the pattern on the overlying level, while still resembling the same initial “pattern,” as can be seen from the example of shrinking the first resist mask in the embodiments described below. Thus, even with some changes in the dimensions of features, the transferred pattern is still considered to be the same pattern as the initial pattern. In contrast, forming spacers around mask features may change the pattern.
With reference to
With continued reference to
With reference to
With reference to
It will be appreciated that where the substrate 110 comprises layers of different materials, a succession of different chemistries, e.g., dry-etch chemistries, may be used to successively etch through these different layers, if a single chemistry is not sufficient to etch all the different materials. It will also be appreciated that, depending upon the chemistry or chemistries used, the spacers 175 and the hard mask layer 130 may be etched. Using amorphous carbon for the primary mask layer 140, however, offers excellent resistance to conventional etch chemistries, especially those used for etching silicon-containing materials. Thus, the primary mask layer 140 may effectively be used as a mask for etching through a plurality of substrate layers, or for forming high aspect ratio trenches. In addition, the pitch doubled pattern 177 and the pattern 230 formed by conventional lithography may simultaneously be transferred to the substrate 110, or each individual layer of the substrate 110, in a single etch step.
With reference to
With reference to
Transferring the patterns 177 and 230 into the substrate can define various features or electrical devices. For example, the substrate 110 can be etched through the patterns 177 and 230 to form a pattern of trenches. The trenches may be used in damascene processing to form, e.g., electrical interconnects such as word lines and bit lines, by filling the trenches with conductive material. Where the substrate 10 is a conductor, the un-etched conductive material may constitute the electrical interconnects.
Trenches defined by etching the substrate 110 may also be filled with insulating material, e.g., silicon oxide, for shall trench isolation applications. Memory cell active areas, such as for flash memory, may be defined between the trenches and floating and control gates may be formed over the active areas.
In some embodiments, the patterns 177 and 230 may be used to define gate structures in the substrate 110. For example, floating and/or control gates may be defined by etching through a sequence of layers, which will form the floating and/or control gates. Insulating material, e.g., silicon oxide, can later be deposited between the gate structures for electrical isolation. Alternatively, the patterns 177 and 230 can be transferred to an insulator layer to form trenches, which can then be filled with one or more conductors.
It will be appreciated that the formation of patterns according to embodiments of the invention offer numerous advantages. For example, because multiple patterns, with differently-sized features, may be consolidated on a single final mask layer before being transferred to a substrate, overlapping patterns may easily be transferred to the substrate. Thus, pitch-multiplied features and features formed by conventional photolithography may easily be formed connected to each other. In addition, the ease of removal of negative photoresist allows photoresist to be deposited directly on exceptionally small, pitch-multiplied features, e.g., features having a pitch of about 100 nm or less or about 60 nm or 50 nm or less, so that conventional photolithography can be used to define a mask on the same level as the pitch-multiplied features.
It will also be appreciated that various modifications of the illustrated process flow are possible. For example, pitch multiplied patterns typically formed closed loops, since the patterns are formed by spacers that are formed along the walls of a mandrel. Consequently, where the pitch multiplied pattern is used to form conductive lines, additional processing steps may be used to cut off the ends of these loops, so that each loop forms two individual, non-connected lines. This may be accomplished, for example, by forming a protective mask around the parts of the lines to be maintained, while etching away the unprotected ends of the masks. A suitable method for cutting off the ends of the loops is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,151,040 to Tran et al., issued Dec. 19, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated be reference herein.
In some embodiments, the transfer of the end portions of the spacers to a lower level is blocked by appropriate patterning of an overlaid pattern, such as that formed in the layer 200. As a result, the transferred pattern does not contain loops, since the transfer of the loop ends can be blocked as desired by the overlaid pattern.
While shown deposited over and between pitch-multiplied spacers, negative resist can be applied to overlay a pattern over any pitch-multiplied feature. For example, the pattern 177 can be transferred to lower hard mask layers, or to a substrate, before negative photoresist is deposited on the pitch-multiplied features and patterned to form other features. The negative photoresist can be used to protect patterned features in an array region while other features are formed or patterned in a periphery region. For example, contacts or electrodes may be formed in the periphery region or the substrate may be doped through the mask formed by the negative photoresist.
It will also be appreciated that the pitch of the pattern 177 may be more than doubled. For example, the pattern 177 may be further pitch multiplied by forming spacers around the spacers 175, then removing the spacers 175, then forming spacers around the spacers that were formerly around the spacers 175, and so on. An exemplary method for further pitch multiplication is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,328,810 to Lowrey et al. In addition, while embodiments of the invention may advantageously be applied to form patterns having both pitch multiplied and conventionally photolithographically defined features, the patterns 177 and 230 may both be pitch multiplied or may have different degrees of pitch multiplication.
Moreover, more than two patterns 177 and 230 can be consolidated in the primary mask layer 140 if desired. In such cases, additional mask layers may be deposited between the layers 130 and 140. For example, the patterns 177 and 230 may be transferred to a mask layer, e.g., the layer 130 or an additional mask layer overlying the primary hard mask layer 140 and then the sequence of steps illustrated in
With reference to
With reference to
In addition, embodiments of the invention may be employed multiple times throughout an integrated circuit fabrication process to form pitch multiplied features in a plurality of layers or vertical levels, which may be vertically contiguous or non-contiguous and vertically separated. In such cases, each of the individual levels to be patterned constitute a substrate 110 and the various layers 120-140 may be formed over the individual level to be patterned. It will also be appreciated that the particular composition and height of the various layers 120-140 discussed above may be varied depending upon a particular application. For example, the thickness of the layer 140 may be varied depending upon the identity of the substrate 110, e.g., the chemical composition of the substrate, whether the substrate comprises single or multiple layers of material, the depth of features to be formed, etc., and the available etch chemistries. In some cases, one or more layers of the layer 120-140 may be omitted or more layers may be added. For example, the layer 140 may be omitted in cases where the hard mask layer 130 is sufficient to adequately transfer a pattern to the substrate 110.
Also, while “processing” through the various mask layers may involve etching an underlying layer in some embodiments, processing through the mask layers may involve subjecting layers underlying the mask layers to any semiconductor fabrication process. For example, processing may involve ion implantation, diffusion doping, depositing, or wet etching, etc. through the mask layers and onto underlying layers. In addition, the mask layers may be used as a stop or barrier for chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) or CMP may be performed on any of the layers to allow for both planarization and etching of the underlying layers, as discussed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006-0216923, published Sep. 28, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
In addition to partially fabricated integrated circuits, embodiments of the invention may be utilized to pattern other substrates. For example, embodiments of the invention may be applied to form gratings, disk drives, storage media or templates or masks for other lithography techniques, including X-ray or imprint lithography.
Consequently, it will be appreciated from the description herein that the invention includes various embodiments. For example, according to some embodiments of the invention, a method for patterning a substrate is provided. The method comprises providing a photoresist layer over an amorphous carbon layer. The photoresist layer is patterned to form photoresist features. A layer of spacer material is blanket deposited over the photoresist features. The spacer material is preferentially etched from horizontal surfaces to define spacers on sidewalls of the photoresist features. The photoresist features are preferentially removed relative to the spacers. A pattern defined by the spacers is transferred to the amorphous carbon layer to define amorphous carbon mask features. Negative photoresist is deposited over and around the amorphous carbon mask features. The negative photoresist is patterned to form a mask pattern defined by the amorphous carbon mask features and the negative resist. The mask pattern is transferred to a substrate.
According to other embodiments the invention, a method for semiconductor fabrication is provided. The method comprises providing features spaced apart by about 50 nm or less, or about 30 nm or less. Negative photoresist is deposited between and above the features. The negative photoresist is patterned using a photolithographic technique to selectively remove at least some of the negative photoresist from between at least some sections of the features. The features have a feature pitch below a minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique.
According to yet other embodiments of the invention, a method for forming a mask for patterning a substrate is provided. The method comprises patterning a photoresist layer to define photoresist mask features. Other mask features are derived from the photoresist mask features without performing photolithography. The other mask features have a pitch less than about half a pitch of the photoresist mask features. Negative photoresist is deposited over and above the other mask features. The negative photoresist is patterned to expose at least some portions of the other mask features. A pattern defined by the other mask features and the patterned negative photoresist is transferred to an underlying substrate.
In addition to the above disclosure, it will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various omissions, additions and modifications may be made to the methods and structures described above without departing from the scope of the invention. All such modifications and changes are intended to fall within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/831,012, filed Jul. 31, 2007. This application is related to and incorporates the following by reference in their entireties: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/931,772 to Abatchev et al., filed Aug. 31, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/932,993 to Abatchev et al., filed Sep. 1, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/931,771 to Tran et al., filed Aug. 31, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/934,317 to Sandhu et al., filed Sep. 2, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/934,778 to Abatchev et al., filed Sep. 2, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/216,477 to Tran et al., filed Aug. 31, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/214,544 to Tran et al., filed Aug. 29, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/134,982 to Abatchev et al., filed May 23, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/217,270 to Wells, filed Sep. 1, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/219,067 to Tran, filed Sep. 1, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/219,604 to Abatchev et al., filed Sep. 1, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/400,603 to Niroomand et al., filed Apr. 7, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/411,401 to Kewley, filed Apr. 25, 2006; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/521,851 to Fischer et al., filed Sep. 14, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234362 | Riseman | Nov 1980 | A |
4419809 | Riseman et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4432132 | Kinsbron et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4502914 | Trumpp et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508579 | Goth et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4648937 | Ogura et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4716131 | Okazawa et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4776922 | Bhattacharyya et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4803181 | Buchmann et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4838991 | Cote et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5013680 | Lowrey et al. | May 1991 | A |
5053105 | Fox, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5117027 | Bernhardt et al. | May 1992 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330879 | Dennison | Jul 1994 | A |
5470661 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5514885 | Myrick | May 1996 | A |
5593813 | Kim | Jan 1997 | A |
5670794 | Manning | Sep 1997 | A |
5753546 | Koh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5789320 | Andricacos et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795830 | Cronin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830332 | Babich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858620 | Ishibashi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5895740 | Chien et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899746 | Mukai | May 1999 | A |
5998256 | Juengling | Dec 1999 | A |
6004862 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010946 | Hisamune et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020255 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042998 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057573 | Kirsch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063688 | Doyle et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071789 | Yang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110837 | Linliu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143476 | Ye et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6207490 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211044 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6288454 | Allman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291334 | Somekh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297554 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335257 | Tseng | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348380 | Weimer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362057 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383907 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395613 | Juengling | May 2002 | B1 |
6423474 | Holscher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455372 | Weimer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6500756 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514884 | Maeda | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522584 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534243 | Templeton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548385 | Lai | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548396 | Naik et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559017 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566280 | Meagley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602779 | Li et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620715 | Blosse et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632741 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638441 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6667237 | Metzler | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673684 | Huang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686245 | Mathew et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689695 | Lui et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706571 | Yu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709807 | Hallock et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6734107 | Lai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744094 | Forbes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762449 | Uchiyama et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773998 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6818141 | Plat et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6835662 | Erhardt et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6867116 | Chung | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875703 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6893972 | Rottstegge et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916594 | Bok | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924191 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955961 | Chung | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962867 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7015124 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7074668 | Park et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7084076 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7183142 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183205 | Hong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183597 | Doyle | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202174 | Jung | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7208379 | Venugopal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7271107 | Marks et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288445 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291560 | Parascandola et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7378727 | Caspary et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7442976 | Juengling | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7537866 | King Liu | May 2009 | B2 |
7651951 | Tran et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7687408 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7851135 | Jung et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20020042198 | Bjarnason et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045308 | Juengling | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063110 | Cantell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068243 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094688 | Mitsuiki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020127810 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030006410 | Doyle | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044722 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030109102 | Kujirai et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119307 | Bekiaris et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127426 | Chang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157436 | Manger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030207207 | Li | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207584 | Sivakumar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215978 | Maimon et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216050 | Golz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030230234 | Nam et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000534 | Lipinski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017989 | So | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018738 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023475 | Bonser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023502 | Tzou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043623 | Liu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053475 | Sharma | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079988 | Harari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106257 | Okamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040235255 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050074949 | Jung et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050112812 | Jang | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112886 | Asakawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142497 | Ryou | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153562 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167394 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186705 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050272259 | Hong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003182 | Lane et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011947 | Juengling | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024940 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024945 | Kim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046161 | Yin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046200 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046201 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046422 | Tran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046484 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083996 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115978 | Specht et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172540 | Marks et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189150 | Jung | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211260 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216923 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231900 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234138 | Fehlhaber et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240361 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060263699 | Abatchev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267075 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273456 | Sant et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026672 | Tang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045712 | Haller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049011 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049030 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049032 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049035 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049040 | Bai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050748 | Juengling | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077524 | Koh et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070148968 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070190762 | Franciscus Van Haren et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205438 | Juengling | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070210449 | Caspary et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215874 | Furukawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215960 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238308 | Niroomand et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249170 | Kewley | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261016 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275309 | Liu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281219 | Sandhu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080054350 | Breitwisch et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080057610 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080057692 | Wells et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070165 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081461 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080292991 | Wallow | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299774 | Sandhu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 36 609 | May 1994 | DE |
0 227 303 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0 491 408 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1 357 433 | Oct 2003 | EP |
57-048237 | Mar 1982 | JP |
64-035916 | Feb 1989 | JP |
05-343370 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H8-55908 | Feb 1996 | JP |
H8-55920 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000-208434 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-357736 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2004-080033 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-152784 | May 2004 | JP |
2005-150333 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-351861 | Jan 2012 | JP |
10-1995-0064748 | Dec 1995 | KR |
10-0122315 | Sep 1997 | KR |
1999-0001440 | Jan 1999 | KR |
1999-027887 | Apr 1999 | KR |
10-2005-0052213 | Jun 2005 | KR |
WO 9415261 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 02099864 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 04001799 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004001799 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004003977 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2005034215 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006026699 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006127586 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bhave et al., “Developer-soluble Gap fill materials for patterning metal trenches in Via-first Dual Damascene process,” preprint of Proceedings of SPIE: Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XXI, vol. 5376, John L. Sturtevant, editor, 2004, 8 pages. |
Cerofolini et al., “Strategies for nanoelectronics”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 81, pp. 405-419. |
Choi et al., “Sublithographic nanofabrication technology for nanocatalysts and DNA chips,” J.Vac. Sci. Technol., pp. 2951-2955 (Nov./Dec. 2003). |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/543,515, filed Oct. 24, 2006.” |
Bergeron, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques for the 90nm Technology Node and Beyond,” Future Fab International, Issue 15, Jul. 11, 2003, 4 pages. |
Bhave et al., “Developer-soluble Gap fill materials for patterning metal trenches in Via-first Dual Damascene process,” preprint of Proceedings of SPIE: Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XXI, vol. 5376, 2004, 8 pages. |
Bruek, S.R.J., “Optical and interferometric lithography—Nanotechnology enablers,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, No. 10, Oct. 2005, pp. 1704-1721. |
Cerofolini et al., “Strategies for nanoelectronics”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 81, pp. 405-419, Apr. 2005. |
Choi et al., “Sublithographic nanofabrication technology for nanocatalysts and DNA chips,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., pp. 2951-2955 (Nov./Dec. 2003). |
Chung et al., “Pattern multiplication method and the uniformity of nanoscale multiple lines*,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol. 1(4), Jul./Aug. 2003, pp. 1491-1495. |
Chung et al., “Nanoscale Multi-Line Patterning Using Sidewall Structure,” Jpn., J. App.. Phys. vol. 41 (2002) Pt. 1, No. 6B, pp. 4410-4414. |
Joubert et al., “Nanometer scale linewidth control during etching of polysilicon gates in high-density plasmas,” Microelectronic Engineering 69 (2003), pp. 350-357. |
Oehrlein et al., “Pattern transfer into low dielectic materials by high-density plasma etching,” Solid State Tech., May 2000, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/543,515, Filed Oct. 24, 2006. |
Ex Parte Cantell, unpublished decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Mar. 4, 2005. |
Park et al., “Mass-productive ultra-low temperature ALD SiO2 process promising for sub-90nm memory and logic devices”, Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM '02 Digest. International pp. 229-232 (2002). |
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 15, 2010 in corresponding Singapore Patent Application No. 200807334-8. |
Sheats et al., “Microlithography: Science and Technology,” Marcel Dekkar, Inc., pp. 104-105 (1998). |
U.S. Office Action issued Jun. 2, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/219,067, filed Sep. 1, 2005. |
U.S. Office Action issued Jun. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/514,117, filed Aug. 30, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action issued Jul. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/367,020, filed Mar. 2, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140045125 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11831012 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 14056367 | US |