Patent Grant
9678440
The disclosure relates to a projection exposure method for exposing a radiation-sensitive substrate, arranged in the region of an image surface of a projection objective, with at least one image of a pattern of a mask arranged in the region of an object surface of the projection objective. The disclosure further relates to a projection exposure system suitable for carrying out the method, and to a projection objective suitable to be used in such a projection exposure system.
Microlithographic projection exposure methods and systems are currently used to fabricate semiconductor components and other finely patterned components. A microlithographic exposure process involves using a mask (reticle) that carries or forms a pattern of a structure to be imaged. The pattern is positioned in a projection exposure system between an illumination system and a projection objective in a region of the object surface of the projection objective. Primary radiation is provided by a primary radiation source and transformed by optical components of the illumination system to produce illumination radiation directed at the pattern of the mask in an illuminated field. The radiation modified by the mask and the pattern passes through the projection objective, which forms an image of the pattern in the image surface of the projection objective, where a substrate to be exposed is arranged. The substrate normally carries a radiation-sensitive layer (photoresist).
When a microlithographic projection exposure system is used in the manufacture of integrated circuits, the mask (reticle) may contain a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the integrated circuit. This pattern can be imaged onto an exposure area on a semiconductor wafer which serves as a substrate. The exposure area is sometimes referred to as a die. A die in the context of integrated circuits is a small block of semiconducting material, on which a given functional circuit is fabricated. A single wafer typically contains a large number of adjacent dies which are successively exposed to an image of the pattern.
In one class of microlithographic projection exposure systems each die is irradiated by exposing the entire pattern of the reticle onto the die at once. Such apparatuses are commonly referred to as wafer steppers.
In alternative exposure systems commonly referred to as step-and-scan apparatus or wafer scanner, each exposure area is irradiated progressively in a scanning operation by moving the mask relative to an illumination beam in an effective object field of the projection objective, and simultaneously moving the substrate relative to the projection beam in the conjugate effective image field of the projection objective in respective scanning directions. The mask is typically held in place by a mask holder, which is movable parallel to the object surface of the projection objective in a scanning apparatus. The substrate is typically held by a substrate holder, which is movable parallel to the image surface in a scanning apparatus. The scanning directions may be parallel to each other or anti-parallel to each other, for example. During the scanning operation, the speed of movement of the mask and the speed of movement of the substrate are interrelated via the magnification ratio β of the projection objective, which is smaller than 1 for reduction projection objectives.
Forming a faithful image of a pattern on the substrate with sufficient contrast typically involves the substrate surface should lying in the focal region of the projection objective during exposure. More specifically, the substrate surface should be arranged in the region of the depth of focus (DOF) of the projection objective, which is proportional to the Rayleigh unit RU defined as RU=λ/NA2, where λ is the operating wavelength of the projection exposure system and NA is the image-side numerical aperture of the projection objective. Deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography λ=193 nm, for example, typically involves a projection objective with a numerical aperture of 0.75 or higher to achieve 0.2 μm or smaller features. In this NA-region, the depth of focus is typically some tenth of a micrometer. In general, the depth of focus tends to decrease as the resolving power of the projection system is increased.
It has long been recognized that systems having relatively narrow depth of focus may involve special technical measures to ensure that the exposure area on the substrate is in focus during exposure.
Imaging errors may also be introduced as a result of gravity falses causing a mask shape to deviate from a planar shape. This effect is frequently referred to as “reticle bending”.
In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a step-and-scan projection exposure method which allows for high quality imaging on substrates having an uneven substrate surface.
In certain embodiments, the disclosure provides a step-and-scan projection exposure method which allows high quality imaging in cases where a pattern to be imaged is formed on an uneven mask surface.
In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a projection exposure method that includes exposing an exposure area of a radiation-sensitive substrate arranged in an image surface of a projection objective with at least one image of a pattern of a mask arranged in an object surface of the projection objective in a scanning operation. The scanning operation includes moving the mask relative to an effective object field of the projection objective and simultaneously moving the substrate relative to an effective image field of the projection objective in respective scanning directions. The projection exposure method also includes changing imaging properties of the projection objective actively during the scanning operation according to a given time profile to change dynamically at least one aberration of the projection objective between a beginning and an end of the scanning operation. Changing at least one imaging property of the projection objective includes changing in a spatially resolving manner an optical effect caused by at least one field element of the projection objective. The field element includes at least one optical surface arranged in a projection beam path optically close to a field surface of the projection objective. At least one field element is a mirror having a reflective surface arranged in the projection beam path optically close to a field surface. Changing at least one imaging property of the projection objective includes changing optical properties of the mirror by changing a surface profile of the reflective surface of the mirror in an optically used area.
The inventors have recognized that conventional methods to ensure a focused imaging of fine structures onto a substrate may not be sufficient in all cases to ensure a high yield of properly exposed substrates and thereby to reduce the reject rate. Specifically, it has been recognized that the reject rate may significantly be influenced by a local unevenness (unflatness) of the substrate surface within the exposure area. If the relative position of the substrate surface within the exposure area varies across the exposure area in a magnitude beyond an acceptable range, parts of the pattern to be imaged within the exposure are may not be sufficiently defined in the structured component, thereby increasing the probability of component failure during the lifetime of the component.
The potential problem may be exemplified when considering, for example, that the depth of focus of projection systems typically designed to print images at the 45 nm node will typically have a depth of focus in the range between about 100 nm and about 150 nm. Specifications published in the INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ROAD MAP FOR SEMICONDUCTORS: 2006 Update, Table 67a indicate that typical desired properties for the site flatness SFQR of wafer substrates within a 26 mm×8 mm exposure area of a scanner system may correspond to the associated DRAM ½ pitch value in direct random access memories (DRAM). For example, those specifications allow using wafers having a site flatness of up to 45 nm within the exposure area of a scanner when printing structures characterized by a DRAM ½ pitch of 45 nm. It is contemplated that conventional measures for accurately placing a substrate surface within the focus region of the projection objective may not be sufficient to account for those values of allowable unevenness of the substrate surfaces within the exposure area in future scanning systems.
In some projection exposure methods, an active manipulation of the imaging properties of the projection objective is performed during the scanning operation, i.e. during the time interval between the beginning of one single scan and the end of one single scan, in which the substrate is moved relative to the effective image field of the projection objective to successively print parts of the pattern of the mask onto the substrate. The active manipulation causes at least one aberration property of the projection objective to be varied dynamically in a targeted fashion according to a given time profile during the scan. The manipulation may be effected by activating at least one manipulation device operatively connected to an optical element of the projection objective to actively change the optical effect of that manipulated optical element and, as a result, also to actively change the imaging properties of the entire projection objective.
Embodiments may be characterized by the fact that a field curvature of the projection objective is dynamically varied according to a given time profile during the scanning operation. A very efficient way to adapt the imaging properties of the projection objective to a time-dependent variation of the substrate surface shape and/or substrate surface position within the exposure area is thereby possible. Alternatively, or in addition, a dynamic variation of field curvature of the projection objective during scanning may also be employed to adapt the imaging properties to a variation of the surface shape and/or surface position of the pattern on the object side of the projection objective. Effects of mask bending caused e.g. by the influence of gravity and/or by forces and moments applied to a mask in a mask holder may thereby be compensated at least partly.
In systems subject to gradual drift of optical properties with time an optical property, such as the focus position, may vary slowly (with a small time constant) in one direction such that the optical property varies little, and in only one direction, during a single scanning operation. In contrast, in embodiments with highly dynamic compensation at least one aberration of the projection objective is changed successively in two opposite directions between a beginning and an end of the scanning operation. In other words, the direction of change may change one or more times during a single scanning operation. In doing so, negative effects of dome-like or valley-like surface unevenness with typical size in the order of the size of an exposure area may be compensated for.
In general, it may be difficult to vary one imaging aberration in an isolated fashion without influencing other imaging aberrations. Therefore, other aberrations, specifically other field aberrations such as distortion, coma, the field profile of defocus, astigmatism and superpositions thereof may be varied synchronously as the field curvature is varied.
In some embodiments, the step of changing at least one imaging property of the projection objective includes changing in a spatially resolving manner the optical effect caused by at least one field element of the projection objective. The term “field element” as used here relates to an optical element which includes at least one optical surface arranged in a projection beam path optically close to a field surface of the projection objective. Actively changing the optical effect caused by a field element allows to exert relatively large corrective effects on field aberrations, such as a field curvature and distortion, while at the same time the influence of the change on wavefront aberrations, such as astigmatism, coma, spherical aberration and higher order aberrations may be kept small. Manipulating a field element may therefore be used to change in a targeted manner field aberrations substantially without inducing parasitic pupil aberrations at the same time.
There are various ways to characterize a position “optically close to a field surface”. In general, it may be useful to define the axial position of optical surface, such as surfaces of lenses or mirrors, by the paraxial sub-aperture ratio SAR which is defined here as:
SAR=(sign CRH)*(MRH/(|MRH|+|CRH|)).
In this definition, parameter MRH denotes the paraxial marginal ray height and parameter CRH denotes the paraxial chief ray height of the imaging process. For the purpose of this application, the term “chief ray” (also known as principle ray) denotes a ray running from an outermost field point (farthest away from the optical axis) of an effectively used object field to the center of the entrance pupil. In rotational symmetric systems the chief ray may be chosen from an equivalent field point in the meridional plane. In projection objectives being essentially telecentric on the object side, the chief ray emanates from the object surface parallel or at a very small angle with respect to the optical axis. The imaging process is further characterized by the trajectory of marginal rays. A “marginal ray” as used herein is a ray running from an axial object field point (field point on the optical axis) to the edge of an aperture stop. That marginal ray may not contribute to image formation due to vignetting when an off-axis effective objective field is used. Both chief ray and marginal ray are used here in the paraxial approximation. The radial distances between such selected rays and the optical axis at a given axial position are denoted as “chief ray height” (CRH) and “marginal ray height” (MRH), respectively. A ray height ratio RHR=CRH/MRH may be used to characterize proximity to or distance from field surfaces or pupil surfaces.
A definition of the paraxial marginal ray and the paraxial chief ray may be found, for example, in: “Fundamental Optical Design” by Michael J. Kidger, SPIE PRESS, Bellingham, Wash., USA (Chapter 2), which document is incorporated herein by reference.
The paraxial sub-aperture ratio as defined here is a signed quantity providing a measure describing the relative proximity of a position along an optical path to a field plane or a pupil plane, respectively. In the definition given above, the paraxial sub-aperture ratio is normalized to values between −1 and 1, where the condition SAR=0 holds for a field plane and a point of discontinuity with a jump from SAR=−1 to SAR=+1 or from SAR=+1 to SAR=−1 corresponds to a pupil plane. Therefore, optical surfaces being positioned optically close to a field plane (such as the object surface or the image surface) are characterized by values of the paraxial sub-aperture ratio close to 0, whereas axial positions optically close to a pupil surface are characterized by absolute values for the paraxial sub-aperture ratio close to 1. The sign of the paraxial sub-aperture ratio indicates the position of the plane optically upstream or downstream of a plane. For example, the paraxial sub-aperture ratio a small distance upstream of a pupil surface and a small distance downstream of a pupil surface may have the same absolute value, but opposite signs due to the fact that the chief ray height changes its sign upon transiting a pupil surface.
Bearing these definitions in mind, a field element may be defined as an optical element having at least one optical surface arranged optically nearer to a field surface than to a pupil surface. Positions optically close to a field surface may be characterized by an absolute value of the ray height ratio RHR=CRH/MRH>1. In other words, typical optical surfaces “optically close to a field surface” are in positions where the absolute value of the chief ray height CRH exceeds the absolute value of the marginal ray height MRH.
In another description the surface “optically close to a field surface” may be characterized by values of the paraxial sub-aperture ratio SAR close to zero. For example, the paraxial sub-aperture SAR may be in the range between 0 and about 0.4 or between 0 and 0.2 at an optical surface of a field element.
In some embodiments, a field element is arranged immediately adjacent to the next field surface such that there is no optical element arranged between the field element and the closest field surface.
The field element may be an optical element of the projection objective. It is also possible that a field element is arranged between the object surface of the projection objective and the object-side entry surface of the projection objective or between the image-side exit surface of the projection objective and the image surface.
The field element provided for aberration manipulation may be a transparent optical element in the projection beam path. In this case, the optical effect of the transparent optical element may be varied or changed in a spatially resolving manner (depending on the location within the optically used area) by changing a spatial distribution of refractive power in the optically used area. For this purpose the two-dimensional distribution of refractive index of a transparent material of the transparent optical element may be changed in a targeted manner. This can be caused, for example, by a targeted local heating of the transparent material. Potentially suitable constructions are disclosed, for example, in WO 2008/034636 A2, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Alternatively, or in addition, the local distribution of refractive power may be changed by changing a spatial distribution of local surface curvature of an optical surface of the transparent optical element. This can be caused by targeted deformation of the optical element, for example. Examples of manipulators are shown e.g. in US 2003/0234918 A1. A combination of changing the refractive index and changing the local distribution of surface curvature may be used. Further, manipulation may be effected by relative displacement of aspheric surfaces having complementary shape, such as shown, e.g. in EP 0 851 304 B1. Electro-optical manipulators may also be utilized. The construction and operation of conventional manipulators may have to be modified to allow sufficient dynamics.
Although the transparent optical field element may be designed as a lens having a substantial refractive power in each of its configurations, the transparent optical field element may also be shaped as a plane parallel plate having substantially no overall optical power. Such plate-like field element may be arranged very close to a field surface in many types of projection objectives, for example close to the object surface or—in projection objectives forming at least one real intermediate image—close to an intermediate image,
In some embodiments, at least one field element is a mirror having a reflective surface arranged in the projection beam path optically close to a field surface. Changing the optical properties of the mirror may include changing a surface profile of the reflective surface in an optically used area. A mirror manipulator may be operatively connected to the field mirror and may be configured in such a way allowing to vary the shape of the reflective surface of the field mirror in one or two dimensions.
The number of degrees of freedom for dynamically changing imaging properties of the projection objective may be increased by providing at least two field elements, which may be manipulated in a prescribed coordinated manner independently of each other. For example, the projection objective may include two reflective field elements (field mirrors), each optically close to the field surface. Each of the field mirrors may be assigned a mirror manipulator configured to vary the shape of the reflective surface of the field mirror in a target fashion.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,385,756 by the applicant discloses catadioptric in-line projection objectives having two intermediate images and two concave mirrors, each arranged near an intermediate, i.e. relatively close to a field surface. Both concave mirrors may be employed as manipulators. The disclosure of this document is incorporated herein by reference.
At least one field element may be arranged close to the object surface. In some embodiments, a transparent field element forms a first element of the projection objective immediately following the object surface such that an entry surface of the field element forms the entry surface of the projection objective. A strong influence on field aberrations may thereby be obtained substantially without influencing pupil aberrations to a significant degree. In projection objectives creating at least one real intermediate image between object surface and intermediate image surface a field element may be arranged optically close to the intermediate image. In some embodiments, the projection objective has at least two or exactly two intermediate images. A field element may be arranged optically close to each of the intermediate image surfaces, which are field surfaces of the projection objective.
Regarding the dynamics of typical manipulations it may be considered that modern scanning systems may operate with scanning speeds between about 0.2 m/s and about 2 m/s, for example. The scanning speed may be in the order of 700 mm/s to 800 mm/s. Typical scanning path lengths may be in the order of several 10 mm (e.g. 30 mm-40 mm). This allows for exposure times in the order of some 10 ms (milliseconds) per exposure area (die). Considering a typical value of about 50 ms scanning time per die the dynamics of manipulation may be in the order of 20 Hz or more in typical cases, such as 40 Hz or more, or 60 Hz or more, or 80 Hz or more, or 100 Hz or more, or 120 Hz or more.
Regarding the amplitude of manipulations it is considered that a local change in field curvature peak-to-valley in the order of ±45 nm may be sufficient in many high NA systems to achieve a reasonable degree of compensation. Such high NA systems may have maximum usable NA in the order of NA=0.8 or higher (e.g. NA≧0.9, NA≧1, NA≧1.2, NA≧1.35).
In relative terms, it is presently considered that a rate of change in the order of 10% of the depth of focus (DOF) within 10 ms (milliseconds) may be sufficient in many cases to achieve sufficient compensation. In some embodiments, the field curvature is changed with a rate of change between about 0.5% and about 50% of the depth of focus (DOF) of the projection objective within a 1 ms time interval
In embodiments configured to effectively compensate for negative effects of substrate unevenness the method may further include: generating substrate surface data representing a surface profile of the substrate in the exposure area; generating manipulator control signals based on the substrate surface data; and driving at least one manipulation device of the projection objective in response to the manipulator control signals to dynamically adapt the imaging properties of the projection objective to reduce imaging aberrations caused by the surface profile in the exposure area.
The substrate surface data may be generated by measuring a topography of the substrate surface in a measuring area including the exposure area. Alternatively, the substrate surface data may be derived from data contained in a look-up-table representing a topography of the substrate surface in a measuring area including the exposure area. Data of the look-up-table may be gathered in advance experimentally or from ab initio calculations. For example, a correction of field curvature may be performed based on a preceding measurement of substrate surface topography, while compensation concepts may be based on data contained in a look-up table.
Imaging aberrations induced by the unevenness of a wafer surface, for example, may thereby be compensated for in a very efficient way. Measurement may be performed by a conventional method. Wafer unevenness may be introduced, for example, by a substrate transfer process, as described for example in: H. W. van Zeijl, J. Su, J. Slabbekoorn, F. G. C. Bijnen, “Lithographic Alignment Offset Compensation for Substrate Transfer Process”, Proc. STW/SAFE, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, 2005, pp 121-126.
In embodiments configured to effectively compensate for negative effects of unevenness of the mask, e.g. caused by gravity induced reticle bending, the method may further include: generating mask surface data representing a surface profile of the mask in an mask area corresponding to the exposure area; generating manipulator control signals based on the mask surface data; and driving at least one manipulation device of the projection objective in response to the manipulator control signals to dynamically adapt the imaging properties of the projection objective to reduce imaging aberrations caused by the surface profile in the mask area.
The mask surface data may be generated by measuring a topography of the mask surface in a measuring area including the mask area corresponding to the exposure area. Alternatively, the mask surface data may be derived from data contained in a look-up-table representing a topography of the mask surface in a measuring area including the mask area corresponding to the exposure area. Data of the look-up-table may be gathered in advance, e.g. experimentally or from ab initio calculations.
Imaging aberrations induced by the unevenness of a mask surface, for example, may thereby be compensated for in a very efficient way.
The previous and other properties can be seen not only in the claims but also in the description and the drawings, wherein individual characteristics may be used either alone or in sub-combinations as an exemplary embodiment of the disclosure and in other areas and may individually represent advantageous and patentable embodiments.
In the following description, the term “optical axis” refers to a straight line or a sequence of a straight-line segments passing through the centers of curvature of optical elements. The optical axis can be folded by folding mirrors (deflecting mirrors) such that angles are included between subsequent straight-line segments of the optical axis. In the examples presented below, the object is a mask (reticle) bearing the pattern of a layer of an integrated circuit or some other pattern, for example, a grating pattern. The image of the object is projected onto a wafer serving as a substrate that is coated with a layer of photoresist, although other types of substrates, such as components of liquid-crystal displays or substrates for optical gratings, are also feasible.
Where tables are provided to disclose the specification of a design shown in a figure, the table or tables are designated by the same numbers as the respective figures. Corresponding features in the figures are designated with like or identical reference identifications to facilitate understanding. Where lenses are designated, an identification L3-2 denotes the second lens in the third objective part (when viewed in the radiation propagation direction).
Arranged downstream of the illumination system is a device RS for holding and manipulating a mask M in such a way that a pattern formed on the mask lies in the exit surface ES of the illumination system, which coincides with the object surface OS of the projection objective PO. The device RS—usually referred to as “reticle stage”—for holding and manipulating the mask contains a mask holder and a scanner drive enabling the mask to be moved parallel to the object surface OS of the projection objective or perpendicular to the optical axis of projection objective and illumination system in a scanning direction (y-direction) during a scanning operation.
The reduction projection objective PO is designed to image an image of a pattern provided by the mask with a reduced scale of 4:1 onto a wafer W coated with a photoresist layer (magnification |β|=0.25). Other reduction scales, e.g. 5:1 or 8:1 are possible. The wafer W serving as a light-sensitive substrate is arranged in such a way that the macroscopically planar substrate surface SS with the photoresist layer essentially coincides with the planar image surface IS of the projection objective. The wafer is held by a device WST (wafer stage) including a scanner drive in order to move the wafer synchronously with the mask M in parallel with the latter. The wafer stage includes a z-manipulator mechanism to lift or lower the substrate parallel to the optical axis OA and a tilting manipulator mechanism to tilt the substrate about two axes perpendicular to the optical axis.
The device WST provided for holding the wafer W (wafer stage) is constructed for use in immersion lithography. It includes a receptacle device RD, which can be moved by a scanner drive and the bottom of which has a flat recess for receiving the wafer W. A peripheral edge forms a flat, upwardly open, liquid tight receptacle for a liquid immersion medium IM, which can be introduced into the receptacle and discharged from the latter by devices that are not shown. The height of the edge is dimensioned in such a way that the immersion medium that has been filled in can completely cover the surface SS of the wafer W and the exit-side end region of the projection objective PO can dip into the immersion liquid given a correctly set operating distance between objective exit and wafer surface.
The projection objective PO has a planoconvex lens as the last optical element nearest to the image surface IS. The planar exit surface of the planoconvex lens is the last optical surface of the projection objective PO. During operation of the projection exposure system, the exit surface of the last optical element is completely immersed in the immersion liquid IM and is wetted by the latter.
In other exemplary embodiments the exit surface is arranged at a working distance of a few millimetres above the substrate surface SS of the wafer in such a way that there is a gas-filled gap situated between the exit surface of the projection objective and the substrate surface (dry system).
As shown schematically in the inset figure of
The projection objective PO may include a plurality of schematically indicated lenses (typical numbers of lenses are often more than 10 or more than 15 lenses) and, if appropriate, other transparent optical components. The projection objective may be purely dioptric (lenses only). The projection objective may include at least one powered mirror, such as at least one concave mirror, in addition to lenses (catadioptric projection objective).
For many applications in the field of microlithograpy the image-side numerical aperture of the projection objective is NA>0.6, and in many exemplary embodiments NA is between approximately NA=0.65 and NA=0.95, which can be achieved by dry objectives. Using an immersion system allows obtaining NA values NA≧1, such as NA≧1.1 or NA≧1.2 or NA≧1.3 or NA≧1.4 or NA≧1.5 or NA≧1.6 NA≧1.7 or above. Typical resolutions down to about 150 nm, or 130 nm, or 100 nm, or 90 nm or less are also possible basically depending on the combination of image-side NA and the wavelength of the radiation source.
The projection objective PO is an optical imaging system designed to form an image of an object arranged in the object surface OS in the image surface, which is optically conjugate to the object surface. The imaging may be obtained without forming an intermediate image, or via one or more intermediate images, for example two intermediate images.
Every optical system has associated with it a sort of basic field curvature, which is conventionally called the Petzval curvature, which is now explained in more detail with reference to
For example, he condition RP<0 holds for a positive lens, corresponding to an inward curvature of the Petzval surface. Therefore, the image of a planar object will be concave towards the radiation direction, which condition is typically referred to as “undercorrection” of field curvature. In contrast, the condition RP>0 holds for a concave mirror, corresponding to overcorrection of the field curvature. A flat image of a flat object is obtained by an imaging system with RP=0. These conditions are shown schematically for projection objective PO in
The Petzval surface and the paraxial image surface coincide on the optical axis. The curvature of the Petzval surface may result in a situation where the Petzval surface departs from the ideal image surface for field points further away from the optical axis. The fact that the Petzval surface is curved transforms to a longitudinal departure p of the Petzval surface from the ideal image surface (which is usually flat) at a field point at the outer edge of the image field (at maximum image field height y′), measured parallel to the optical axis in the image space. The term “image field curvature” is conventionally used to refer to such longitudinal departure (or sag) at maximum image field height y′, and may not be confused with the “curvature of the image field”, which is the reciprocal of the radius of curvature of the image field.
Note that
Conditions on the image-side of the objective are now explained in connection with
In general, not all field points within the design image field IFD are used for a lithographic process. Instead, exposure is only performed using field points lying within an effective image field IF, which should be sufficiently large in size to allow reasonably sized substrates to be exposed in a lithographic process. The effective image field desirably fits into the design image field IFD in order to include only field points for which the objective is sufficiently corrected and for which no vignetting occurs. There are various ways to fit an effective image field into a design image field depending on the design of an objective.
In projection exposure systems designed for a scanning operation, a slit-shaped effective image field IF is used.
State-of-the-art scanning projection exposure systems may be equipped with a wafer stage allowing to move the subtrate table parallel to the optical axis (zmanipulation) and also to tilt the wafer table about two mutually perpendicular axes perpendicular to the optical axis (x-tilt and y-tilt). The system may be operated to shift and/or tilt the wafer table between exposure steps in order to adjust the position of the substrate surface with respect to the focal region of the projection objective based on previous measurements of the substrate surface (see e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,674,510 B1).
However, those systems are not fully capable of accounting for local unevenness of the substrate surface within an exposure region. Instead, a compromise position of the substrate surface with respect to the focal region of the projection objective will typically be obtained. The inventors have recognized, however, that an uneven surface profile within an exposure area may cause deterioration of the quality of the imaging process, thereby leading to increased reject rates in the manufacturing of microstuctured semiconductor devices, for example.
In the following the unevenness of the substrate surface will be treated as a disturbance for the lithographic imaging process. For illustration purposes,
In the following, the wavefront aberrations caused by the projection system and/or induced by external conditions are expressed as a linear combination of polynomials. In the optics field, several types of polynomials are available for describing aberrations, for example Seidel polynomials or Zernike polynomials. Zernike polynomials are employed in the following to characterize aberrations.
The technique of employing Zernike terms to describe wavefront aberrations originating from optical surfaces deviating from being perfectly spherical is a state-of-the art technique. It is also well established that the different Zernike terms signify different aberration phenomena including defocus, astigmatism, coma and spherical aberration up to higher aberrations. An aberration may be expressed as a linear combination of a selected number of Zernike polynomials. Zernike polynomials are a set of complete orthogonal polynomials defined on a unit circle. Polar coordinates are used, for example with ρ being the normalized radius and θ being the azimuth angle. A wavefront aberration W(ρ, θ) may be expanded in Zernike polynomials as a sum of products of Zernike terms and respective weighting factors (see e.g. Handbook of Optical Systems: Vol. 2, Physical Image Formation, ed. By H Gross, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Chapter 20.2, (2005)). In a Zernike representation, the Zernike polynomials Z1, Z2, Z3 etc. have certain meanings identifying respective contributions to an overall aberration. For example, Z1=1 corresponds to a constant term (or piston term), Z2=ρ cos θ corresponds to a distortion in x direction (or a wavefront tilt in x direction), Z3=ρ sin θ corresponds to distortion in y direction (or a wavefront tilt in y direction), Z4=2ρ2−1 corresponds to a defocus (parabolic part), Z5=ρ2 cos 2θ corresponds to astigmatism third order, etc.
Zernike polynomials may also be used to characterize deviations of an optical surface, such as a lens surface or a mirror surface, from a nominal surface, e.g. a spherical surface.
The following example shows how imaging aberrations induced by uneven substrate surface within an exposure area of the scanning lithography apparatus may be significantly reduced. Schematic
The dashed line in each case represents the Petzval surface PS of the projection objective, which is adapted to conform to the surface topography of the substrate within the effective image field to allow reducing the imaging aberrations caused by the uneven substrate surface. In the example, the projection objective is slightly undercorrected with respect to field curvature at the moment t1 and the correction status is dynamically changed to a slightly overcorrected condition at moment t2. This significant variation of image field curvature of the imaging system is effective dynamically within fractions of a second adapted to the scanning speed. The variation is effective based on surface topography measurements performed prior to the scanning operation, as explained in more detail below.
Considering a typical value of about 50 ms scanning time per die the dynamics of manipulation may be in the order of 20 Hz or more, for example.
In relative terms, it is presently considered that a rate of change in the order of 10% of the depth of focus (DOF) within 10 ms (milliseconds) may be sufficient in many cases to achieve sufficient compensation. In some exemplary embodiments, the defocus is changed with a rate of change between about 0.5% and about 50% of the depth of focus (DOF) of the projection objective within a 1 ms time interval.
The rate of change of imaging aberrations, such as field curvature and/or distortion, brought about by active manipulation of one ore more optical elements of the projection objective may be orders of magnitude faster than time-dependent changes which may occur during the use of the projection system caused by environmental changes, such as changes of environmental pressure and/or temperature, and/or changes induced by heating of the system.
The effects of targeted manipulation of one or more optical elements of projection objectives situated relatively close to a respective field surface (field elements) will now be described in more detail using working examples of catadioptric projection objectives adapted to immersion lithography at an NA>1. The respective exposure systems may be equipped with state-of-the-art manipulators for moving the mask and/or the reticle parallel to the optical axis and for tilting the mask and/or the wafer about one or more tilt axis perpendicular to the optical axis. In addition, the exposure systems may be equipped with wavelength manipulators to shift the center wavelength λ, of the system within a manipulation range Δλ adapted to the status of chromatic correction of the respective projection objectives.
In each case, one or more additional manipulators are specificially provided to account for effects of substrate surface unevenness and/or unevenness of the reticle, as explained more detailed below.
Projection objective 700 is designed to project an image of a pattern on a reticle arranged in the planar object surface OS (object plane) into the planar image surface IS (image plane) on a reduced scale, for example, 4:1, while creating exactly two real intermediate images IMI1, IMI2. The rectangular effective object field OF and image field IF are off-axis, i.e. entirely outside the optical axis OA. A first refractive objective part OP1 is designed for imaging the pattern provided in the object surface into the first intermediate image IMI1. A second, catoptric (purely reflective) objective part OP2 images the first intermediate image IMI1 into the second intermediate image IMI2 at a magnification close to 1:(−1). A third, refractive objective part OP3 images the second intermediate image IMI2 onto the image surface IS with a strong reduction ratio.
Projection objective 700 is an example of a “concatenated” projection objective having a plurality of cascaded objective parts which are each configured as imaging systems and are linked via intermediate images, the image (intermediate image) generated by a preceding imaging system in the radiation path serving as object for the succeeding imaging system in the radiation path. The succeeding imaging system can generate a further intermediate image (as in the case of the second objective part OP2) or forms the last imaging system of the projection objective, which generates the “final” image field in the image plane of the projection objective (like the third objective part OP3).
The path of the chief ray CR of an outer field point of the off-axis object field OF is indicated in
Three mutually conjugated pupil surfaces P1, P2 and P3 are formed at positions where the chief ray CR intersects the optical axis. A first pupil surface P1 is formed in the first objective part between object surface and first intermediate image, a second pupil surface P2 is formed in the second objective part between first and second intermediate image, and a third pupil surface P3 is formed in the third objective part between second intermediate image and the image surface IS.
The second objective part OP2 includes a first concave mirror CM1 having the concave mirror surface facing the object side, and a second concave mirror CM2 having the concave mirror surface facing the image side. The used parts of the mirror surfaces, i.e. those areas of the mirror surfaces which are illuminated during operation, are both continuous or unbroken, i.e. the mirrors do not have a hole or bore in the illuminated region. The mirror surfaces facing each other define a catadioptric cavity, which is also denoted intermirror space, enclosed by the curved surfaces defined by the concave mirrors. The intermediate images IMI1, IMI2 are both situated inside the catadioptric cavity well apart from the mirror surfaces.
The objective 700 is rotational symmetric and has one straight optical axis OA common to all refractive and reflective optical components (“In-line system”). There are no folding mirrors. An even number of reflections occurs. Object surface and image surface are parallel. The concave mirrors have small diameters allowing to arrange them close together and rather close to the intermediate images lying in between. The concave mirrors are both constructed and illuminated as off-axis sections of axial symmetric surfaces. The light beam passes by the edges of the concave mirrors facing the optical axis without vignetting. Both concave mirrors are positioned optically remote from a pupil surface rather close to the next intermediate image. The objective has an unobscured circular pupil centered around the optical axis thus allowing use as projection objectives for microlithography.
Both concave mirrors CM1, CM2 are arranged optically close to a field surface formed by the next intermediate image, as indicated by the following table A giving the data for marginal ray height MRH, chief ray height CRH, ray height ratio RHR and sub-aperture ratio SAR:
A position optically close to a field surface may also be characterized by the shape of the projection beam at the respective surface. Where an optical surface is optically close to a field surface, the cross sectional shape of the projection beam deviates significantly from the circular shape typically found in a pupil surface or in proximity thereto. In this context, the term “projection beam” describes the bundle of all rays running from the effective object field in the object surface towards the effective image field in the image surface. Surface positions optically close to a field surface may be defined as positions where the beam diameters of the projection beam in two mutually perpendicular directions orthogonal to the propagation direction of the beam may deviate by more than 50% or more than 100% or more from each other. Typically, an illuminated area on an optical surface optically close to a field surface will have a shape strongly deviating from a circle end resembling a high aspect ratio rectangle corresponding to a desirable field shape in scanning lithographic projection apparatus. It can be seen from
A primary function of the two concave mirrors CM1 and CM2 is to correct the Petzval sum by providing an overcorrecting contribution to Petzval sum counteracting the undercorrecting influence of positive refractive power of lenses. The contribution of the concave mirrors to field curvature may be varied dynamically by varying the surface curvature of the reflective surfaces according to a defined spatial and time profile. For this purpose, each of the first and second concave mirrors is associated with a mirror manipulator MM1, MM2, respectively, both configured for a two-dimensional deformation (deformation with spatial resolution in two dimensions) of the associated concave mirror during a scanning operation. The mirror manipulators may be identical or different in construction.
In the example, each of the concave mirrors has a highly reflective (HR) coating on a flexible portion of a mirror substrate. A number of actuators (represented by arrows) of a mirror manipulator MM1 or MM2 are operatively coupled to the back side of the flexible portion. The actuators are controlled by a mirror control unit MCU, which may be an integral part of central control unit of the projection exposure apparatus. The manipulator control unit is connected to receive signals representing a desired deformation of the mirror surface. The mirror manipulator and corresponding control unit may be designed essentially as disclosed in applicants patent applications US 2002/0048096 A1 or US 2005 0280910 A1 (corresponding to WO 03/98350 A2), for example. The corresponding disclosures are incorporated into this application by reference.
Any suitable construction of the pupil mirror manipulator may be used instead, for example manipulators using electromechanical actuators, such as piezoelectrical elements, actuators responding to fluid pressure changes, electric and/or magnetic actuators. These actuators may be used to deform a continuous (unbroken) mirror surface as described. The mirror manipulator may also include one or more heating elements and/or cooling elements effecting local temperature changes of the mirror leading to a desired deformation of the mirror surface. Resistance heaters or Peltier elements may be used for that purpose.
The effect of two-dimensional deformation of both the first and the second concave mirror CM1, CM2 during a scanning operation was simulated for a wafer substrate having an uneven substrate surface with a concave parabolic profile in cross-scan direction (x-direction) with 45 nm difference between maximum height and minimum height (45 nm peak-to-valley), substantially as schematically shown in
In a first scenario SC1 the substrate unevenness has been corrected by active manipulation of the wafer z-position and wafer tilt status, basically as explained in connection with
In a third scenario SC3 the surface shapes of both the first and the second concave mirror CM1, CM2 have been two-dimensionally deformed in a time-dependent manner during the scanning operation to reduce aberrations caused by the unevenness of the substrate surface.
These values indicate that the dynamic deformation of field elements reduces significantly the contribution of substrate surface unevenness to the focus budget, where it is presently amongst the dominating contributions. A significant improvement of process latitude in the lithographic process is thereby obtained. At the same time, the desired properties related to focus errors can be relaxed with regard to other contributing effects, such as lens heating or the like.
The compensation mechanism can be implemented in a projection exposure apparatus including a projection objective which has one or more manipulators associated with one or more optical elements of the projection objective by integrating the manipulator(s) into a control system configured to change imaging properties of the projection objective actively during the scanning operation according to a given profile to change dynamically at least aberration of the projection objective between a beginning and an end of the scanning operation. The manipulator associates with an optical element may be connected to a control unit generating manipulator control signals which initiate respective changes of the optical effect of the manipulated optical element. The manipulator control signals may be generated in different ways. In some exemplary embodiments, a measuring system is provided which allows measuring the surface topography of a substrate surface in a measuring area including the exposure area. Alternatively, the substrate surface data may also be derived from data contained in a look-up-table representing a measured or calculated topography of the substrate surface in an area including the exposure area.
Where the system is configured to allow compensation of distortion of other aberrations caused by non-ideal surface shape of the mask, corresponding measures can be implemented to account for non-even surface shape of the reticle. Corresponding mask surface data representing a surface profile of the mask in a mask area corresponding to the exposure area may be generated either based on a measurement or based on data from a look-up-table, for example. Mask surface data may be processed by the control unit to generate manipulator control signals which are then used to control at least one manipulation device within the projection objective to dynamically adapt the imaging properties of the projection objective in a compensating way to reduce imaging aberrations caused by the surface profile in the mask area.
Projection objective 1000 is designed to project an image of a pattern on a reticle arranged in the planar object surface OS (object plane) into the planar image surface IS (image plane) on a reduced scale, for example, 4:1, while creating exactly two real intermediate images IMI1, IMI2. The rectangular effective object field OF and image field IF are off-axis, i.e. entirely outside the optical axis OA. A first refractive objective part OP1 is designed for imaging the pattern provided in the object surface into the first intermediate image IMI1. A second, catadioptric (refractive/reflective) objective part OP2 images the first intermediate image IMI1 into the second intermediate image IMI2 at a magnification close to 1:(−1). A third, refractive objective part OP3 images the second intermediate image IMI2 onto the image surface IS with a strong reduction ratio.
Projection objective 1000 is another example of a “concatenated” projection objective having a plurality of cascaded objective parts which are each configured as imaging systems and are linked via intermediate images, the image (intermediate image) generated by a preceding imaging system in the radiation path serving as object for the succeeding imaging system in the radiation path. The sequence is refractive-catadioptric-refractive (R-C-R).
The path of the chief ray CR of an outer field point of the off-axis object field OF is drawn bold in
Three mutually conjugated pupil surfaces P1, P2 and P3 are formed at positions where the chief ray CR intersects the optical axis. A first pupil surface P1 is formed in the first objective part between object surface and first intermediate image, a second pupil surface P2 is formed in the second objective part between first and second intermediate image, and a third pupil surface P3 is formed in the third objective part between second intermediate image and the image surface IS.
The second objective part OP2 includes a single concave mirror CM situated at the second pupil surface P2. A first planar folding mirror FM1 is arranged optically close to the first intermediate image IMI1 at an angle of 45° to the optical axis OA such that it reflects the radiation coming from the object surface in the direction of the concave mirror CM. A second folding mirror FM2, having a planar mirror surface aligned at right angles to the planar mirror surface of the first folding mirror, reflects the radiation coming from the concave mirror CM in the direction of the image surface, which is parallel to the object surface. The folding mirrors FM1, FM2 are each located in the optical vicinity of, but at a small distance from the closest intermediate image. Therefore, the folding mirrors are field mirrors. A double pass region where the radiation passes twice in opposite directions is thereby formed geometrically between the deflecting mirrors FM1, FM2 and the concave mirror CM. A negative group NG having two negative lenses is arranged in a region with large marginal ray height near the concave mirror and coaxial with the concave mirror such that the radiation passes twice in opposite directions through the negative group. No optical element is arranged between the negative group and the concave mirror.
The first optical element immediately adjacent to the object surface OS is a transparent plane-parallel plate PP arranged very close to the object field. Following Table B gives the data for marginal ray height MRH, chief ray height CRH, ray height ratio RHR and sub-aperture ratio SAR of the entry surface 1 and the exit surface 2 of the plate PP:
The plate is associated with the manipulation device MAN allowing to vary the two-dimensional distribution of refractive index of the plate material in response to electrical signals on a short time scale with high spatial resolution. The construction of the manipulator may be based on the wire grid manipulator system disclosed in WO 2008/034636 A2, which is incorporated herein by reference. A cooling system for actively cooling the transparent manipulator element may be provided to increase the dynamics and allow for rapid changes of temperature.
Further, manipulation may be effected by relative displacement of aspheric surfaces having complementary shape, such as shown, e.g. in EP 0 851 304 B1. A pair of aspheres may be arranged immediately adjacent to the object surface as a field element. Electro-optical manipulators may also be utilized. Further, a manipulator may be constructed to include cylinder lens elements rotatable relative to each other (see e.g. EP 0 660 169 B1), and placed near a field surface, such as the object surface.
As in the first exemplary embodiment, three correction scenarios SC1, SC2 and SC3 have been simulated for comparison. In the first scenario SC1 the substrate unevenness has been corrected by active manipulation of the wafer z-position and wafer tilt status, basically as explained in connection with
In a third scenario SC3 time-dependent lateral refractive index inhomogeneities within the plane plate PP have been applied to optimize the field curvature and other field aberrations of the projection objective dynamically during the scanrung operation. The two-dimensional (spatial) distribution of refractive index may be described Zernike coefficients Z2 to Z49, for example.
These values indicate that the dynamic modifications of refractive power distribution in the field plate PP reduces significantly the contribution of substrate surface unevenness to the focus budget, where it is presently amongst the dominating contributions. A significant improvement of process latitude in the lithographic process is thereby obtained. At the same time, the desired properties related to focus errors can be relaxed with regard to other contributing effects, such as lens heating or the like.
The exemplary embodiments show that a dynamic change of imaging properties, such as field curvature of the projection objective during a scanning operation may significantly improve the aberration level for the entire exposure process in cases where the surface of the substrate to be exposed is not perfectly flat in the exposure area. However, this is only one of many problems which may be solved or induced by providing a projection exposure system with a manipulation mechanism allowing a targeted change of the imaging properties of the projection objective during a single scanning operation. Another problem which may be addressed by the improved structure and functionality is the problem commonly referred to as “reticle bending”.
In general, the projection objective is aligned with its optical axis in the direction of gravity in typical exposure systems. The mask bearing the pattern is then typically oriented in a horizontal plane, perpendicular to the optical axis. As a consequence the reticle (mask) may sag owing to the force of gravity, the sagging basically being a function of the type of the reticle and of the mounting technique securing the reticle in a reticle holder. In general, the two-dimensional deviation from a planar alignment of the pattern may not be known a priori and may be difficult to determine. As a consequence of the sagging, individual locations on the reticle which are to be imaged may be displaced from their desired position (given at a perfectly planar reticle) in a way that cannot be completely predicted a priori, the direction and length of this displacement generally being a function of the location on the reticle. A further cause for possible sagging of the reticle is the direct influence of the mounting technique on the shape of the mounted reticle. In general, forces and moments caused by bearings and/or clamps acting on the reticle may contribute to a complex deformation status of the reticle during the exposure. These influences may not be fully known a priori and can differ from reticle to reticle, but they can also be identical for classes of reticles.
Problems resulting from reticle bending have been frequently addressed in various ways, such as demonstrated for example in WO 2006/01300 A2 by the applicant or in US 2003/0133087 A1.
The problems of aberrations caused by reticle bending may be addressed in a dynamic fashion with exemplary embodiments of the exposure apparatus configured to dynamically change the imaging properties of the projection objective during a scanning operation.
A similar study has been performed for the second exemplary embodiment employing a transparent field PP element coupled with a manipulator allowing for a change in the two-dimensional distribution of refractive index within the plate.
In this exemplary embodiment, the portions of the substrates of the folding mirrors carrying the reflective mirror coating are flexible to a limited extent such that the reflective surface area can be bend in response to external forces to a certain extent. A number of actuators (represented by arrows) of a first mirror manipulator MM1 associated with the first folding mirror FM1 and a second mirror manipulator MM2 associated with the second folding mirror FM2 are operatively coupled to the backside of the flexible portion of the respective mirrors. The actuators are controlled by a mirror control unit MCU, which may be an integral part of a central control unit of the projection exposure apparatus. The mirror control unit is connected to receive signals representing a desired deformation, or an absence of deformation, of the respective mirror surfaces. Each mirror manipulator is configured to bend the associated reflective surface either in one dimension only (for example cylindrical shape of the mirror surface) or in two dimensions (for example substantially concave or convex spherical or aspherical mirror surface shape).
The bending manipulation of one or both folding mirrors ina an inward and/or an outward direction allows a variety of degrees of freedom to manipulate the optical performance of the projection objective particularly with respect to field aberrations. The mirror surfaces can be deformed in a time-dependent manner during a scanning operation to reduce undesired aberrations, such as aberrations caused by an unevenness of the substrate surface. Since there are two manipulators which may be operated independent of each other, different aberrations may be corrected independently from each other. Further, an additional manipulation range may be obtained in cases where manipulation of a single mirror would not be sufficient to provide the range of manipulation involved to compensate certain aberrations. The effects obtainable by manipulating the folding mirrors may be similar to those obtainable by manipulating concave mirrors arranged close to intermediate images such as described in connection with
It has been shown with various exemplary embodiments that a real-time correction of field aberrations, such as field curvature, during a scanning operation in a scanning projection exposure apparatus may significantly reduce imaging aberrations which may be induced by deviations of the substrate surface and/or of the surface of the pattern from the ideal planar shape. Specifically, negative effects of wafer surface unevenness and/or reticle bending in scanning exposure systems may be significantly reduced.
The above description of exemplary embodiments has been given by way of example. From the disclosure given, those skilled in the art will not only understand the present disclosure and its attendant advantages, but will also find apparent various changes and modifications to the structures and methods disclosed. It is sought, therefore, to cover all changes and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the disclosure, as defined by the appended claims, and equivalents thereof
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09001938 | Feb 2009 | EP | regional |
This applications is a continuation of, and claims priority under 35 USC 120 to, U.S. application Ser. No. 14/683,377, filed Apr. 10, 2015, which is a continuation of, and claims priority under 35 USC 120 to, U.S. application Ser. No. 14/496,933, filed Sep. 25, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,036,129, which is a continuation of, and claims priority under 35 USC 120 to, U.S. application Ser. No. 12/699,529, filed Feb. 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,873,022, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to European Patent Application EP 09001938.1, filed Feb. 12, 2009. The contents of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4226507 | Fuschetto | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4647164 | Sawicki et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 6338823 | Furukawa | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6674510 | Jasper et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6813001 | Fujisawa et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6844994 | Melzer et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 7184124 | Harned et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7196772 | Bleeker | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7385756 | Shafer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7593091 | Geyl | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7826035 | Bleeker | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 8294991 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8873022 | Juergens | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9036129 | Juergens | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9063439 | Goehnermeier et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 20020011573 | Van Dijsseldonk et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020048096 | Melzer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20030090640 | Fujisawa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030133087 | Shima | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030234918 | Watson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040036940 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20050118528 | Bleeker | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050237505 | Harned et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280910 | Fehr et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060023179 | Tschischgale et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060092393 | Harmed et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060232866 | Sai et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256314 | Nolscher et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070165203 | Bleeker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080055740 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080088811 | Geyl | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080106711 | Beierl et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080174858 | Feldmann et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316447 | Yabu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090042115 | Inoue et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042139 | Shiraishi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090090640 | Jang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090103065 | Yoshihara | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20100027143 | Angel | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100079739 | Goehnermeier et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100079741 | Kraehmer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177294 | Wang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100201962 | Juergens | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20150049320 | Juergens | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150227052 | Juergens | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20160320707 | Juergens | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1910494 | Feb 2007 | CN |
| 10 2006 024 810 | Nov 2007 | DE |
| 0 961 149 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 0 660 169 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 1 376 192 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 0 851 304 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 11-045846 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 11-354410 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 2002-037545 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002-189193 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2003-142373 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2004-056125 | Feb 2004 | JP |
| 2005-150714 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2006-054453 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2006-128699 | May 2006 | JP |
| 2008-518454 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2008-233932 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2008-263193 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2008-292801 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2010-187002 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| 2014-239240 | Dec 2014 | JP |
| WO 9932940 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 0237545 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 03098350 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2006013100 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006053751 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2008034636 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008126925 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008126926 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008145296 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008146933 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009013230 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009018911 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Kidger, “Fundamental Optical Design”, SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington, USA (Chapter 2). |
| van Zeijl et al., “Lithographic Alignment Offset Compensation for Substrate Transfer Process,” Proc. STW/SAFE, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, 2005, pp. 121-126. |
| Handbook of Optical Systems: vol. 2, Physical Image Formation, ed. By H Gross, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, Chapter 20.2, (2005). |
| International Technology Road Map for Semiconductors: 2006 Update, Table 67a (43 pages). |
| Japanese Office Action, with English translation, for corresponding JP Appl. No. 2010-047084, dated Mar. 23, 2012. |
| European Search Report for corresponding for the corresponding EP Application No. 09001938.1, dated Jul. 14, 2009. |
| Japanese Office Action, with translation thereof, for corresponding JP Appl No. 2010-047084, dated May 30, 2013. |
| Taiwanese Office Action, with translation thereof, for TW Appl No. 099104346, dated Dec. 15, 2014. |
| Japanese Office Action, with English translation thereof, for JP Application No. 2014-147060. 6 pages, dated Jun. 25, 2015. |
| Japanese office action, with English translation thereof, for corresponding JP Appl No. 2016-082705, dated Feb. 20, 2017. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160320707 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14683377 | Apr 2015 | US |
| Child | 15155613 | US | |
| Parent | 14496933 | Sep 2014 | US |
| Child | 14683377 | US | |
| Parent | 12699529 | Feb 2010 | US |
| Child | 14496933 | US |
