Pulsed laser sampling for mass spectrometer system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6734423
  • Patent Number
    6,734,423
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 8, 2002
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 11, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A mass spectrometer system comprising a laser and a mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer has a vacuum interface that provides entrance of a gaseous sample into an extraction region of the mass spectrometer. The laser is positioned to provide laser light incident on a sample non-gaseous substance positioned adjacent the vacuum interface. The laser light provides vaporization of the sample, which provides a high concentration of gaseous molecules from the sample substance at the vacuum interface.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates to mass spectrometry, mass spectrometers and applications thereof.




2. Description of the Related Art




Mass spectrometers provide a fundamental tool of experimental chemistry and have proven useful and reliable in identification of chemical and biological samples. Mass spectrometry is a technique used to determine the masses of molecules and specific fragmentation products formed following vaporization and ionization. Detailed analysis of the mass distribution of the molecule and its fragments leads to molecular identification. The combination of specific molecular identification and extreme sensitivity makes molecular spectroscopy one of the most powerful analytical tools available.




However, the typical mass spectrometer is confined to the laboratory or other fixed sites due to its relatively large size and weight, as well as its high power and cooling requirements. Thus, mass spectrometer technology has not been used as a field portable detection system. Other impediments to field use include large storage reservoirs of samples that are typically required for reliable identification, whereas field samples are often much smaller and detection of such small samples is often essential (for example, in the case of detection of a chemical or biological agent that is lethal at small doses).




Thus, there is typically an abundant sample available for analysis in mass spectrometers located in a laboratory or in a commercial setting. Thus, a highly resolved spectrum may be achieved by repeated ionization and detection of the analyte. By contrast, in the field, only a small and diffuse sample maybe available for collection from the environment. In addition, samples collected in the field (for example, a soil sample that only contains trace amounts of an explosive) may not be adequate for identification of a chemical or biological agent contained therein even if transported to a laboratory grade mass spectrometer.




A significant related problem arises in chemical vapor detection of certain substances using mass spectroscopy. For example, chemical vapor detection of certain important substances that require detection, such as drugs and explosive compounds, is hindered by their extremely low vapor pressures. For example, the equilibrium vapor pressure of trinitrotoluene (TNT) is 10


−9


atm and RDX it is 10


−9


atm. For these types of vapor concentrations, it is difficult for even the highly sensitive detection performed by a mass spectrometer to accurately measure concentrations.




For these compounds, a different detection technique relies on the principle that vapor pressure of a substance increases exponentially with increasing temperature. Hence, for certain applications such as batch sampling of suspected packages, the detection community has implemented a technology based on collection of particulate matter from contaminated surfaces by wiping or vacuuming onto a filter media. The sample is then heated to a point where it develops sufficient vapor pressure to enable vapor phase detection. This approach, however, is extremely slow, inefficient and, considering the bulk thermal treatment of the sample media, very power hungry.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Among other things, it is thus an object of the invention to provide a system and method that provides an efficient collection of particulate samples for analysis by a mass spectrometer. It is a further objective of the invention to provide a system and method that efficiently vaporizes a substance of interest (i.e., a particular chemical or biological agent) that is then provided in a highly concentrated amount to an extraction stage of a mass spectrometer. Finally, it is an objective to implement both of the aforementioned objectives in a field portable mass spectrometer.




In accordance with these objectives, the invention provides a mass spectrometer system comprising a laser and a mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer has a vacuum interface that provides entrance of a gaseous sample into an extraction region of the mass spectrometer. The laser is positioned to provide laser light incident on a sample nongaseous substance positioned adjacent the vacuum interface. The laser light provides vaporization of the sample, which provides a high concentration of gaseous molecules from the sample substance at the vacuum interface.




The invention also provides a method of analyzing a non-gaseous sample for a compound of interest. The method includes generating laser light having at least one parameter adjusted to provide enhanced vaporization of the compound of interest from the sample. The laser light is directed so that it is incident on the sample for at least one time interval, thereby vaporizing at least part of the sample. A collection of at least a portion of the vapor is synchronized with the at least one time interval. A chemical vapor analysis of the portion of the vapor collected is performed, the chemical vapor analysis including determining whether the substance of interest is present in the sample.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic representation of a mass spectrometer system in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 2

is an alternative embodiment of a mass spectrometer system in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a representational cross-section of components of the mass spectrometer system as shown in

FIG. 2

; and





FIG. 3



a


is a graph of voltage versus distance for a component shown in FIG.


3


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring to

FIG. 1

, the principle components of an embodiment of the mass spectrometry system


10


of the present invention are shown. The mass spectrometer system of the embodiment of

FIG. 1

is a stationary system, for example, one that generally remains in a fixed location, such as a laboratory, commercial operation, airport security office, etc. The mass spectrometer


12


of the system may be any type of mass spectrometer, which are well known in the art. For example, mass spectrometer


12


may be a time-of-flight mass spectrometer.




Laser


14


shown in

FIG. 1

may be a pulsed infrared (IR) laser. Laser light


14


′ emitted from laser


14


is focused via focusing optics


16


(which may comprise lenses and collimators) and reflected by reflecting surface


18


(such as a mirror) onto a top surface of table


20


. A continuous wave laser with an associated shutter system may be substituted for the pulsed laser. (For convenience, the specification will principally refer to a “pulsed laser”, which will be understood to mean other configurations, including the continuous wave laser with a shutter system.) A sample


22


is positioned on the surface of table


20


at the surface area where the laser light


14


′ is incident. Thus, as shown, when laser light


14


′ is emitted from laser


14


, it is incident on sample


22


.




As shown, mass spectrometer


12


is adjacent to table


20


. A pulsed valve


24


and associated gas intake


26


are part of an extension portion


12




a


of mass spectrometer


12


. When pulsed valve


24


is pulsed open, the vacuum of the mass spectrometer draws air or other gas into the mass spectrometer through the gas intake


26


. The air intake


26


is, for example, a conical funnel. The gas intake


26


structure is optional; the intake portion of the pulsed valve


24


itself may provide the gas intake.




A controller


30


(which may be any digital control device, including a processor, microprocessor, PC, computer, microcomputer, etc.) provides control signals to laser


14


and mass spectrometer


12


via signal conduits (for example, electrical wires)


31




a


,


31




b


. The signal sent from controller


30


to laser


14


initiates a pulse of laser light


14


′ from laser


14


and, as described above, is incident on the sample


22


. At or about the same time the signal is sent from the controller


30


to laser


14


, a control signal is sent from controller


30


to mass spectrometer


12


to open pulsed valve


24


.




The pulse of laser light


14


′ arriving at the sample


22


serves to vaporize a portion of the sample


22


, which creates a vapor plume at the gas intake


26


. As noted, the pulsed valve


24


is briefly pulsed open at about the same time by the signal sent from the controller


30


to the mass spectrometer


12


. When open, the vacuum of the mass spectrometer


12


serves to draw vapor (molecules) from the sample


22


into the gas intake


16


, through the valve, and into an adjacent extraction region of the mass spectrometer


12


. For vapor matter that is not ionized by laser light


14


′ prior to entering the mass spectrometer


12


, the ionizing mechanism of the extraction region of the mass spectrometer


12


provides ionization, followed by acceleration due to a voltage applied across a portion of the extraction region. If some matter is previously ionized by the laser light


14


′, it will be accelerated by the potential difference even if there is no further ionization in the mass spectrometer


12


.




The controller


30


provides user input, shown in

FIG. 1

as GUI


32


. Other input mechanisms may be substituted for the GUI. The GUI


32


may allow the user to initiate pulsing of the laser


14


and the corresponding pulsing of the pulsed valve


24


by the controller


30


. It may also provide for multiple pulsings such that multiple vapor samples are created and collected for analysis by the mass spectrometer


12


. It may also provide multiple pulsings of the laser


14


to ensure vaporization of the sample


22


, which is then collected by a single pulsing of the pulsed valve


24


. In addition, the GUI may provide a menu to a user of chemicals or biological compounds. The user may select a particular chemical and or biological compound suspected of being present in the sample


22


. Controller


30


may have an associated database that correlates the selected compound with associated lasing parameters. The lasing parameters may comprise, for example, the optimum wavelength, power, pulse frequency and/or pulse-width of laser light to provide a degree of specificity for the compound of interest.




For example, the stored parameter regarding optimum power for a compound may be the threshold power that is just sufficient to vaporize the compound of interest. Such power, when directed at a sample, will thus vaporize the compound of interest while other less volatile compounds will remain in the solid phase and not contribute to a background reading in the mass spectral analysis. The optimum wavelength stored for a compound, for example, may be a wavelength near a common vibrational transition of the compound. Such a wavelength would provide a resonant heating effect of the compound that further enhances the signal to environmental noise ratio in the mass spectral analysis.




Such optimizing parameters for the database of compounds associated with the controller


30


may be determined through empirical testing. For example, samples of a known compound may be placed in the system


10


shown in

FIG. 1

, and a lasing parameter may be varied and the mass spectral readings may be recorded and compared. The optimum setting of the lasing parameter may be determined by comparing the mass spectral readings. Other lasing parameters and other known compounds may be analyzed in like manner, thus creating the database of optimum lasing parameters for a range of compounds.




For example, experimental measurements for the compound 1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane (RDX), indicate that for a CO


2


pulsed laser, a set of preferred vaporizing parameters comprises a wavelength of 10.6 mm, a 100 ns pulse width and a pulse energy of 10 mJ/pulse.




Controller


30


transmits the appropriate control signals to laser


14


so that the parameters of the laser light are in accordance with the associated wavelengths stored in the database which are associated with the compound of interest selected by the user. Thus, for example, if there is an associated optimum power associated with the selected compound, then the controller


30


sends a signal to the laser


14


so that laser light is emitted at the optimum power. As noted above, such a power setting serves to vaporize the compound of interest if it is present in sample


22


, while other less volatile compounds that might be present in sample


22


will remain in the solid phase. Thus, the vapor drawn into mass spectrometer


22


via the pulsed valve


24


will have a large heart cut of the compound of interest (if present), since the less volatile compounds that are not of interest will not be vaporized and will thus not contribute to a background reading in the mass spectral analysis.




As noted, pulsing of pulsed valve


24


and pulsing of the laser


14


occurs at or about the same time, as initiated by control signals from controller


30


. Because the laser light


14


′ is effectively transmitted to the sample


22


instantaneously, thermalization of the sample


22


occurs simultaneously with the pulsed opening of the pulsed valve


24


. As also noted, the vapor drawn into the mass spectrometer through the pulsed valve


24


thus has a large heart cut of the sample vapor. Alternatively, the controller


30


may slightly delay pulsing of the pulsed valve


24


, so that it occurs slightly after pulsing of the laser


14


. The laser pulse may vaporize certain substances present in the sample


22


, for example, water, before the compound of interest. Thus, the leading edge of the vapor plume created at the sample


22


may be water (or other) vapor, followed by the vapor from the substance of interest. By slightly delaying opening of the pulsed valve


24


, the leading edge of the plume will have passed, and the vapor in the vicinity of the valve


24


will have its highest concentration of the substance of interest. Thus, a better heart cut of the substance of interest will enter the mass spectrometer


12


. A delay on the order of 0.1 ms for a sample


22


positioned approximately 1 cm from the pulsed valve


24


provides the requisite delay.




As noted, the vapor particles drawn into the mass spectrometer


12


via the pulsed valve


24


enters the extraction region of the mass spectrometer, where they are ionized and accelerated. Ionization may take place in any number of conventional ways, such as using an electron beam or an ionizing laser. Acceleration is generally provided by a potential difference between two plates or grids, one at a high voltage and a second at ground. The corresponding mass spectrum output by the mass spectrometer


12


is analyzed to determine if the compound of interest is present. The mass spectrum may be analyzed in a traditional manner, for example, by an expert analyst viewing an oscilloscope (not shown) connected to the detector (not shown) of the mass spectrometer


12


. Alternatively, the controller


30


may contain software that automatically identifies the threat by receiving the mass spectral data from the detector of mass spectrometer


12


. Certain identification processing by a controller associated with a mass spectrometer is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/207,907, filed May 30, 2000 entitled “Mass Spectrometer Threat Identification System” for Hayek, et al., the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.




For a mass spectrometer system


10


that has an abundant power supply, such as one in a fixed location as shown in

FIG. 1

(for example, in an airport, lab or other setting), the pulsed valve


24


may be replaced with a small opening that comprises a small, controlled leak in the vacuum portion of the mass spectrometer


24


adjacent the extraction region. The leak may be, for example, 1×10


4


Torr liters/sec [vol/time]. For such a leak, the vacuum pumps of typical laboratory and commercial mass spectrometers may readily maintain the required vacuum in the system. In this configuration the mass spectrometer


12


will be continually pulling in air and other particulate matter from the environment. Thus, the controller


30


may be programmed to switch the output from the detector of the mass spectrometer


12


on when there is laser pulsing of the sample


22


and to switch the detector output off when there is no pulsing. The mass spectral output of the detector will thus correspond to those times when laser light


14


′ is incident on the sample


22


, and the attendant vapor from the sample


22


is drawn into the mass spectrometer


12


.




A system that includes a mass spectrometer having a controlled leak may comprise, for example, an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS), which is commonly used for detection of explosives and drugs. In particular, a Photo-Chem 110 with a Model SF-12 air sampler (available from the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory) and a CO


2


pulsed laser provide good results. In the trials, the pulsed valve used was the Iota One valve (Model Number 99-46-900) from General Valve Corporation driven by the Iota One valve controller.





FIG. 2

depicts a second embodiment of the invention, wherein the mass spectrometer system


100


is portable. The mass spectrometer system


100


has many analogous components to that depicted in FIG.


1


and described above, and generally operates using the same principles. Thus, housing


112


houses a portable mass spectrometer, which may be, for example, a TOF mass spectrometer. (The principle components of an embodiment of a TOF mass spectrometer included within housing


112


is described further below with respect to

FIG. 3.

) Housing includes a user interface


132


, comprising a display


134


and keypad


136


for user input. The display


134


and keypad


136


of the interface


132


interfaces with a processor (not shown in

FIG. 2

) located within housing


112


, which generally controls the operation of the mass spectrometer system


100


.




At an end of the housing


112


is a pulsed valve


124


and a pulsed UV laser


114


. When pulsed open, the pulsed valve


124


provides an entrance for a sample compound from the environment outside of the housing


112


and into the vacuum of the mass spectrometer contained within the housing. Pulsed valve


124


is located adjacent the extraction region (i.e., the ionizing and acceleration region) of the mass spectrometer. Thus, when a sample compound enters the mass spectrometer via pulsed valve


124


, it is ionized, accelerated and provides a mass spectral output in accordance with the operation of the particular mass spectrometer used.




In general, the system


100


may be held directly adjacent a surface


122


that is suspected of including particles of a compound of interest. Pulsed laser


114


(which may be, for example, a CO


2


pulsed UV laser) emits one or more laser pulses


114


′ that are directed immediately in front of the opening of the pulsed valve


124


which, as shown, is incident on surface


122


. As in the first embodiment, the parameters of laser pulses


114


′ are optimized for the compound of interested, thus heating and providing a vapor plume that will include a high concentration of molecules of the compound of interest (if present) adjacent the pulsed valve


124


. The pulsed valve


124


is opened simultaneously with the pulsing of the laser


114


(or momentarily thereafter, as described above for the first embodiment), thus drawing the highly concentrated vapor into the vacuum of the mass spectrometer.




The user selects a substance of interest through the interface


132


, for example, by scrolling through a menu of compounds on the display


134


using the keypad


136


, and then selecting a compound of interest using the keypad


136


. The selection is transmitted to the processor, which consults an associated database that comprises optimized lasing parameters for the substances contained therein. The processor uses the optimized parameters of the selected substance of interest to adjust the parameters of laser


114


, analogous to the manner described above for the first embodiment. Collection of the sample (i.e., pulsing of the laser


114


and valve


124


) may be initiated through keypad


136


.




As described above, the laser pulse


114


′ will vaporize compounds located on surface


122


and, if the compound of interest is present on surface, then a relatively high concentration of the compound will be drawn into the mass spectrometer with the corresponding pulsing of pulsed valve


124


. As noted, the particles are accelerated by mass spectrometer and the detector of the mass spectrometer provides a mass spectral output for the particles. The mass spectral output may be analyzed by software in the processor, which may also provide an output to the user via display


134


of whether the compound of interest is present. The detection of other compounds may also be displayed.




The processor may include software that analyzes the compound in accordance with the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/207,907. Alternatively, the mass spectral output itself may be displayed to the user, who may be a mass spectral analyst trained to determine the presence or absence of compounds based on spectral lines.




In addition, portions or the majority of the processing provided for the system


100


may be provided by a separate processing device that interfaces (via a wire, air, fiber optic or other interface) with the system


100


as shown. For example, a PC having an input/output cable may interface with a cable port on the housing


112


. The PC may provide a GUI wherein the user selects the compound of interest and the associated optimum lasing parameters are selected from a database in the PC and attendant control signals are sent to the laser


114


to adjust the laser to the optimum parameters. Once a mass spectrum is generated by the mass spectrometer, it may be transmitted via the cable to the PC, where it is processed to determine if the compound of interest is present.




The above-described PC may provide all processing control of the mass spectrometer system


100


, or portions thereof. For example, once the optimizing parameters are transmitted to the mass spectrometer system


100


and the parameters are adjusted to the compound of interest, the system


100


may be disengaged, transported to a remote site, where the system


100


is used to collect compounds from various surfaces and generate the corresponding mass spectra. (In this case, the mass spectrometer system


100


would have to have a limited amount of processing and storage, to generate and store the mass spectra. It would also have to store the processing required to pulse the laser


114


and valve


124


when activated by the user (for example, via a switch). It may also have to store and process one or more of the downloaded optimizing parameters themselves, such as the pulse-width of the laser for the compound of interest.) Once the samples are collected and the mass spectra are generated, the system


100


may be re-engaged with the PC, wherein the mass spectra are downloaded and processed to determine whether the compound of interest is present.





FIG. 3

is a representative depiction of the interior of housing


112


for a particular type of mass spectrometer, namely a nonlinear reflectron time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer. Various components attendant to the mass spectrometer that are well-known, such as the vacuum pumps, chambers, valves, etc., are omitted for convenience. As shown in

FIG. 3

, molecules


148


in vapor form from a sample enter the vacuum chamber via pulsed valve


124


as described above. The molecules


148


are bombarded by electrons of an ionizing electron beam, represented by component


150


, thus transforming the molecules into ionized particles (which are also referred to with the same reference number


148


). The ionized particles


148


pass through an opening of high voltage electrode


152


(having voltage V) and into an acceleration region


154


defined by high voltage electrode


152


and ground electrode


156


. (The extraction region


157


shown is thus comprised of the ionization region of the electron beam


150


and the acceleration region


154


.) The particles


150


are thus accelerated between electrodes


152


and


156


and pass through an opening in ground electrode


156


with energy approximately equal to eV (presuming the particles have a single ionized charge).




The ionized particles travel through a drift region


158


and into a reflector or reflectron region


160


at the end of the drift region


158


, which applies a voltage that increases according to the equation of a circle with distance that the ion penetrates the reflectron region


160


. The voltage applied by the reflectron


160


is as shown in

FIG. 2



a


. The reflector or reflectron generally comprises a series of equally spaced conducting rings


162


that form a retarding/reflecting field in which the ions penetrate, slow down gradually, and reverse direction, thereby reflecting the ion's trajectory back along the incoming path, as shown in FIG.


2


. (The distance traveled by the ions in the Y direction as shown in

FIG. 2

are exaggerated for convenience.)




Ions of a given mass pass into the reflector and are turned around at the same nominal depth within the retarding field. As shown in

FIG. 3

, however, the energy spread ∀ U


o


for ions of the same mass having a nominal energy eV results in ions having the same mass penetrating the reflector slightly more or less than the nominal depth of an ion of energy eV. Because ions having a higher energy (and velocity) penetrate deeper into the opposing field, they spend more time in the reflectron and will lag slower ions having the same mass upon exiting the reflectron. However, the lagging ions exit the reflectron at a higher velocity and thus catch up with the slower ions. Thus, instead of continuing to disperse through the drift region (as in the linear TOF mass spectrometer), the reflectron imparts a focusing effect on the ions traveling in the drift region.




For the reflectron configuration of

FIG. 3

, the time of flight is given by:








t


=(


m/


2


eV


)exp(−1/2)[


L




1




+L




2


+4


d]








The voltage placed on the last lens element V


r


is generally slightly larger than the accelerating voltage V, so that the average penetration depth d will be slightly shorter than the reflectron depth. A first-order kinetic energy focusing at detector


164


positioned as shown for ions having the same mass is achieved when L


1


+L


2


=4d. In addition, for the reflectron having the voltage distribution as shown in

FIG. 2



a


, such focusing occurs over the entire mass range for a detector located at one position in the focal region. Further details of such a nonlinear reflectron TOF mass spectrometer is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,985 to Cornish et al., entitled “Non-linear Field Reflectron”, issued Nov. 7, 1995, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.




As noted above, a processor


166


receives the output of the detector


164


, thus providing the mass spectral data. As noted above, processor


166


may process the mass spectral data to determine whether a selected compound of interest is present, or it may provide the mass spectral data to a separate processing device (such as a PC) for such processing. In addition, processor


166


may provide the optimal lasing parameters to laser


114


and also provides the timed pulsing signals to the laser


114


and pulsed valve


124


, as described above. (Thus, processor


166


has an electrical or other interface with laser


114


and valve


124


, which is not shown in

FIG. 3

for convenience.)




Alternatively, the mass spectrometer within the housing


112


of

FIG. 2

may be the Photo-Chem 110 with a Model SF-12 air sampler and a CO


2


pulsed laser, as described above with the pulsed valve being the Iota One valve (Model Number 99-46-900) from General Valve Corporation driven by the Iota One valve controller. Other types of mass spectrometers may also be used in the system.




In addition, the user may input other parameters that may be used to optimize the lasing parameters. For example, the user may input what type of substrate the compound of interest is located on or within. The substrate may be, for example, dirt, a porous surface, a non-porous surface, etc. The optimum lasing parameters for substances stored in the database may be further defined as function of substrate. The optimum lasing parameters based on substance may be determined empirically and stored in the database associated with the mass spectrometer system processor. For example, the optimum lasing wavelength, pulse-width, power, etc. may be greater for detecting RDX if it is in a soil sample where the laser must penetrate further in order to vaporize a sufficient sample than if it is in a dust form lying on a Formica table. Thus, when the user inputs the type of substrate (via the GUI, display, or other input device), the laser parameters used to vaporize the sample will take into account the substrate in which the suspected compound of interest resides.




In addition, the vaporization provided by the laser and the associated intake of the sample provided by the pulsed valve may be readily adapted to other vapor detectors, including optical spectrometers, ion mobility spectrometers and gas chromatographs.




Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, but rather it is intended that the scope of the invention is as defined by the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A mass spectrometer system comprising a pulsed laser and a mass spectrometer, the mass spectrometer having a vacuum interface comprising a pulsed valve that provides entrance of a gaseous sample into an extraction region of the mass spectrometer, the laser positioned to provide laser light incident on a sample non-gaseous substance positioned adjacent the pulsed valve, wherein the laser light provides vaporization of the sample, that provides a high concentration of gaseous molecules from the sample substance at the pulsed valve the opening of the pulsed valve being synchronized with a pulse of laser light from the laser.
  • 2. The mass spectrometer system as in claim 1, wherein the synchronized opening of the pulsed valve is provided by a controller.
  • 3. The mass spectrometer system as in claim 1, wherein at least one parameter of the laser light emitted by the laser is adjusted to provide enhanced vaporization of a compound of interest suspected of being included in the sample.
  • 4. The mass spectrometer system as in claim 3, wherein the at least one parameter is one of the wavelength, power, pulse-width and pulse frequency.
  • 5. The mass spectrometer system as in claim 3, wherein the compound of interest is selected by a user via an associated user interface.
  • 6. The mass spectrometer system as in claim 5, wherein the system further includes an associated database of compounds and one or more associated parameters that provide enhanced vaporization of the respective compound, and an associated controller that receives the compound of interest selected by the user and initiates adjustment of the laser light in accordance with the one or more associated parameters as stored in the database for the selected compound.
  • 7. The mass spectrometer system of claim 1, wherein the system is a field portable mass spectrometer system.
  • 8. A method of analyzing a non-gaseous sample for a compound of interest, the method comprising the steps of:a) generating laser light having at least one parameter adjusted to provide enhanced vaporization of the compound of interest from the sample; b) directing the laser light so that it is incident on the sample for at least one time interval, thereby vaporizing at least part of the sample; c) synchronizing a collection of at least a portion of the vapor with the at least one time interval including opening a pulsed valve at a time determined in relation to the at least one time interval; and d) performing a chemical vapor analysis of the portion of the vapor collected, the chemical vapor analysis including determining whether the substance of interest is present in the sample.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the chemical vapor analysis is one of mass spectroscopy, optical spectroscopy, ion mobility spectroscopy and gas chromatography.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the at least one parameter is one of wavelength, power, pulse-width and pulse frequency.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 60/208,089, filed May 31, 2000, entitled “Pulsed Infrared Laser Sampling Methodology for Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer Detection of Particulate Contraband Materials” of Wayne A. Bryden. The contents of the aforesaid U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/208,089 are hereby incorporated by reference.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US01/16694 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO01/93305 12/6/2001 WO A
US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
4209697 Renner et al. Jun 1980 A
4740692 Yamamoto et al. Apr 1988 A
4855594 Kimock et al. Aug 1989 A
4889987 Gruen et al. Dec 1989 A
5210412 Levis et al. May 1993 A
5308979 Villa-Aleman May 1994 A
5580733 Levis et al. Dec 1996 A
5663561 Franzen et al. Sep 1997 A
5728584 Sausa et al. Mar 1998 A
6281493 Vestal et al. Aug 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
222 730 May 1985 DE
0 860 859 Aug 1998 EP
2 797 956 Mar 2001 FR
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
K.P.Aicher et al.: “multiphoton Ionization of molecules: a comparison between femtosecond and nanosecond laser pulse ionization efficiency” Journal American Society for Mass Spectrometry, vol. 6, 1995, pp. 1059-1068, XP002200284, p. 1060; figure 2.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 2000, No. 03, Mar. 30, 2000 & JP 11 352105 A (NKK Corp), Dec. 24, 1999 abstract.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/208089 May 2000 US