This application is a 35 U.S.C. §371 national phase application of PCT/CN2012/071854, filed on Mar. 2, 2012, which claims priority to a Chinese Patent Application No. 201110050705, filed on Mar. 3, 2011, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The invention relates to the general field of magnetic field detection by MTJ or GMR devices with particular reference to methods for integrating magnetic sensors into push-pull bridges using standard semiconductor packaging techniques.
Magnetic sensors are widely used in modern systems to measure or detect physical parameters including but not limited to magnetic field strength, current, position, motion, orientation, and so forth. There are many different types of sensors in the prior art for measuring magnetic field and other parameters. However, they all suffer from various limitations well known in the art, for example, excessive size, inadequate sensitivity and/or dynamic range, cost, reliability and other factors. Accordingly a need exists for improved magnetic sensors, especially sensors that can be easily integrated with semiconductor devices and integrated circuits and manufacturing methods thereof.
Magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) sensors have the advantages of high sensitivity, small size, low cost, and low power consumption. Although MTJ devices are compatible with standard semiconductor fabrication processes, methods for building high sensitivity devices with sufficient yield for low cost mass production have not been adequately developed. In particular, yield issues due to offset in the magnetoresistive response of MTJ sensors, and difficulty in matching the magnetoresistive response of MTJ elements when combined to form bridge sensors have proven difficult.
In order to overcome the above-mentioned problems in the prior art, the present invention describes a magneto-resistive sensor using MTJ or GMR sensors in a multi-chip configuration to form push-pull bridge sensors.
A first possible implementation of the present invention is a push-pull half-bridge magnetic field sensor. The sensor includes one or more pairs of MTJ or GMR magnetoresistive sensor chips, wherein one of the sensor chips in each pair is rotated 180 degrees with respect to the other, and the sensor chips are adhered to a standard semiconductor package lead frame. Each sensor chip contains one or more MTJ or GMR sensor elements interconnected as a single magnetoresistive element or a plurality of MTJ or GMR magnetoresistive elements. The MTJ or GMR elements have a resistance that is linearly proportional to an applied magnetic field over some portion of their magnetoresistive transfer curve. Each of the magnetoresistive sensor chips have substantially the same RH and RL values. Note here and other places in this article the terms “substantially equal” or “of roughly equal size”, refers to the difference is very small, generally within 5%. The bond pads of the sensor chip are designed such that more than one wire bond may be attached to each side of the string of magnetoresistive elements.
The sensor chips are designed such that the intrinsic saturation field of each magnetoresistive sensor chip minus the offset field of the sensor chip's transfer curve is greater than the desired maximum magnetic field the sensor bridge is intended to measure.
Furthermore, sensor chips are tested and sorted before assembly in order to better match their transfer curve characteristics.
Moreover, the two half bridges maybe are oriented at 90 degrees with respect to each other in order to produce a two-axis magnetic field sensor.
Finally, the lead frame and sensor chips are encapsulated in plastic to form a standard semiconductor package.
Another possible implementation of the present invention is a full bridge push-pull magnetic field sensor, comprised of one or more pairs of identical MTJ or GMR magnetoresistive sensor chips, wherein one of the sensor chips in each pair is rotated 180 degrees with respect to the other, and the sensor chips are adhered to a standard semiconductor package lead frame. Each sensor chip is configured as a pair of magnetoresistive elements, and each of the magnetoresistive elements in the pair is composed of a string of one or more GMR or MTJ magnetoresistive sensor elements. The MTJ or GMR elements have a resistance that is linearly proportional to an applied magnetic field over some portion of their magnetoresistive transfer curve. Each of the magnetoresistive sensor chips have substantially the same RH and RL values. The bond pads of each sensor chip are designed such that more than one wire bond may be attached to each side of each string of magnetoresistive elements. Each magnetoresistive sensor chip has a crossover in the top and bottom conductors, such that the bond pads on one side of the sensor chip are swapped in position with respect to the magnetoresistive elements, in order to permit wirebonding of the two identical chips in order to form a push-pull full-bridge sensor without crossing the bond wires. The input and output connections of the bridge composed of the magnetoresistive sensor chips are wire bonded to the lead frame.
Furthermore, the sensor chips are designed such that the intrinsic saturation field of each magnetoresistive sensor chip minus the offset field of the sensor chip's transfer curve is greater than the desired maximum magnetic field the sensor bridge is intended to measure. The sensor chips may be tested and sorted before assembly in order to better match their transfer curve characteristics. Finally, the lead frame and sensor chips are encapsulated in plastic to form a standard semiconductor package.
A two-axis version of the second implementation may be fabricated within a single package sensor wherein two full bridges as described in claim 6 are oriented at 90 degrees with respect to each other. Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages; it provides a push-pull bridge easily manufactured in a standard semiconductor package, comprising at least one pair of MTJ sensor chip, wherein a chip relative to the other chip is rotated 180 degrees. In this arrangement, the non-ideal offset in magnetoresistive response that occurs during manufacturing of the sensors cancels, thus providing linear sensor with nearly ideal response.
FIG. 1—Schematic drawing of the magnetoresistive response of a spin-valve sensing element with the reference layer magnetization pointing in the negative H direction.
FIG. 2—Schematic drawing of the magnetoresistive response of a spin-valve sensing element with the reference layer magnetization pointing in the positive H direction.
FIG. 3—Schematic drawing of a half-bridge composed of magnetoresistive sensors.
FIG. 4.—Output of a push-pull half-bridge in which R+ is connected to Vbias and R− is connected to ground.
FIG. 5—Output of a push-pull half-bridge in which R− is connected to Vbias and R+ is connected to ground.
FIG. 6—A drawing showing how two magnetoresistive sensor chips may be oriented with respect to each other and interconnected in order to form a half-bridge sensor.
FIG. 7—A drawing showing how two magnetoresistive sensor chips may be placed within a standard semiconductor package in order to form a push-pull half-bridge.
FIG. 8—A drawing of a completed half-bridge sensor in a standard semiconductor package.
FIG. 9—Schematic drawing of a full-bridge sensor composed of magnetoresistive elements.
FIG. 10—Field dependence of the output of a push-pull full-bridge magnetoresistive sensor.
FIG. 11—A schematic drawing showing how two magnetoresistive chips may be located with respect to each other and interconnected in order to form a push-pull full bridge.
FIG. 12—A drawing showing how two magnetoresistive sensor chips may be placed within a standard semiconductor package in order to form a push-pull full-bridge.
FIG. 13—A drawing of a completed full-bridge sensor in a standard semiconductor package.
The combination of the preferred embodiments of the invention are described in detail, in order to make the advantages and features of the invention more clear to those skilled in the art and also to define the scope of protection of the invention.
The general form of the magnetoresistive transfer curve of a GMR or MTJ magnetic sensor element suitable for linear magnetic field measurement is shown schematically in
The transfer curves in
Assuming these magnetoresistive elements 23 and 24 are connected in series in a half-bridge configuration as shown in
And in the case where Vbias and GND are swapped, it may further be written as
The different half-bridge transfer curves 30 and 40 are illustrated in
The equations can be expressed in terms of magnetoresistance. Assuming the magnetoresistance is expressed as MR=(RH−RL)/RL, then
These equations hold in the linear region 35, 45. Note the response is unipolar in voltage response, offset from zero voltage by an amount Vbias/2 indicated at points 36, 46. Equations 5 and 6 predict the sensitivity will increase as MR increases, and decrease as Hs increases.
The extent of the linear region in the half bridge is reduced from 2Hs to
HLinear=2(Hs−Ho) (7)
The device will therefore function as a linear sensor provided Ho is less than Hs, but the linear field range is reduced. This behavior is common to all push-pull bridges if the offset in the and R− sensor elements is in the opposite direction.
In order to guarantee the bridge is linear over the desired field range a linear sensor should thus be designed with the Hs of each magnetoresistive elements in the bridge greater than the maximum field that the sensor bridge is intended to measure and given by
Hs=Hmax+Ho, (8)
Where Hmax is the maximum field the bridge sensor is intended to measure.
A full bridge push-pull sensor is shown schematically in
For the full bridge, the output is given as
V(H)=VA(H)−VB(H) (9)
This response 80 is plotted in
Unlike the half-bridge response 30 and 40, the full-bridge response V(H) 80 is bipolar in voltage response and the response to magnetic field H is twice as strong. It may be expressed in terms of magnetoresistance as
Like the half-bridge sensors, the full bridge sensitivity increases as MR is increased, and the sensitivity decreases as Hs increases. For MR>>(Hs+Ho)/(2Hs) the response does not increase much. The point of no return is about MR>500%.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications can be made to the proposed invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Further, it is intended that the present invention cover modifications and variations of the present invention provided that such modifications and variations come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalence.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011 1 0050705 | Mar 2011 | CN | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2012/071854 | 3/2/2012 | WO | 00 | 9/2/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/116657 | 9/7/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7960970 | Kasajima et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20110025321 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140203384 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |