The present invention relates generally to memory devices, and particularly to methods and systems for mitigating Back Pattern Dependency (BPD) effects in memory devices.
Several types of memory devices, such as Flash memories, use arrays of analog memory cells for storing data. Each analog memory cell stores a quantity of an analog value, also referred to as a storage value, such as an electrical charge. The storage value represents the information stored in the cell. In Flash memories, for example, each analog memory cell holds a certain amount of electrical charge. The range of possible analog values is typically divided into regions, each region corresponding to one or more data bit values. Data is written to an analog memory cell by writing a nominal analog value that corresponds to the desired bit or bits.
Some memory devices, commonly referred to as Single-Level Cell (SLC) devices, store a single bit of information in each memory cell, i.e., each memory cell can be programmed to assume two possible memory states. Higher-density devices, often referred to as Multi-Level Cell (MLC) devices, store two or more bits per memory cell, i.e., can be programmed to assume more than two possible memory states.
Flash memory devices are described, for example, by Bez et al., in “Introduction to Flash Memory,” Proceedings of the IEEE, volume 91, number 4, April, 2003, pages 489-502, which is incorporated herein by reference. Multi-level Flash cells and devices are described, for example, by Eitan et al., in “Multilevel Flash Cells and their Trade-Offs,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), New York, N.Y., pages 169-172, which is incorporated herein by reference. The paper compares several kinds of multilevel Flash cells, such as common ground, DINOR, AND, NOR and NAND cells.
In some memory device types, memory cells are arranged in cell strings. Each cell string comprises a group of cells that are connected back-to-back in series with one another. Cell strings are typically used, for example, in NAND Flash devices. NAND Flash devices are described, for example, by Jung et al., in “A 117 mm2 3.3 Volts Only 128-Mb Multilevel NAND Flash Memory for Mass Storage Applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, (11:31), November, 1996, pages 1575-1583, and by Takeuchi et al., in “A Double Level VTH Select Gate Array Architecture for Multi-Level NAND Flash Memories,” Digest of Technical Papers, 1995 Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Jun. 8-10, 1995, pages 69-70, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Memory cells that are arranged in cell strings sometimes suffer from Back Pattern Dependency (BPD) distortion. BPD distortion in a given cell is typically caused by changes in the conduction properties of other cells in the string, which cause an artificial shift in the storage value read from the given cell. U.S. Pat. No. 7,310,272, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, describes a memory device that accounts for back pattern effects by applying a first voltage during a verify operation for unselected word lines that have been subjected to a programming operation, and a second voltage for unselected word lines that have not been subjected to a programming operation.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method for operating a memory that includes multiple analog memory cells, the method including:
storing data in the memory by writing first storage values to the cells, so as to cause the cells to hold respective electrical charge levels;
after storing the data, reading second storage values from at least some of the cells, including at least one interfered cell that belongs to a group of cells;
detecting and canceling a Back Pattern Dependency (BPD) distortion caused by the electrical charge levels of one or more interfering cells in the group to at least one of the second storage values read from the at least one interfered cell; and
processing the second storage values, including the at least one of the second storage values in which the BPD distortion was canceled, so as to reconstruct the data.
In some embodiments, the analog memory cells include NAND Flash cells, and the group of cells includes a NAND string. In an embodiment, detecting and canceling the BPD distortion include evaluating a condition indicating that the interfered cell is likely to be subject to the BPD distortion, and canceling the BPD distortion responsively to the evaluated condition. In another embodiment, storing the data includes encoding the data with an error detection code, and evaluating the condition includes decoding the error detection code and identifying a data error using the decoded error detection code. In yet another embodiment, reading the second storage values includes processing the read second storage values so as to identify one or more over-programmed cells among the memory cells in the memory, and evaluating the condition includes determining that the group of cells includes at least one of the over-programmed cells.
In a disclosed embodiment, detecting and canceling the BPD distortion include recursively estimating a part of the BPD distortion in a given cell in the group based on one or more other parts of the BPD distortion in respective one or more cells in the group that were programmed earlier than the given cell, and on the second storage values that were read from the one or more cells. Estimating the part of the BPD distortion may include measuring a total BPD distortion that is caused by the cells in the group, and estimating the part of the BPD distortion based on the total BPD distortion. In some embodiment, the cells in the group are connected in series to one another, and measuring the total BPD distortion includes applying pass voltages to respective gates of the cells in the group and measuring a current flowing through the cells responsively to the applied pass voltages.
In an embodiment, the cells in the group are connected in series to one another, reading the second storage value from the interfered cell includes applying a read voltage to a gate of the interfered cell, applying pass voltages to respective gates of the other cells in the group and measuring a current flowing through the cells responsively to the applied read voltage and pass voltages, and canceling the BPD distortion includes increasing at least one of the pass voltages and reading the second storage value from the interfered cell using the increased pass voltages. Increasing the pass voltages may include increasing the pass voltages of only a subset of the cells in the group that were programmed later than the interfered cell. Increasing the pass voltages may include increasing the pass voltages iteratively until meeting a condition indicating that the BPD distortion is canceled. In an embodiment, increasing the pass voltages includes storing the pass voltages for which the condition was met, and applying the stored pass voltages when performing a subsequent read operation on the group of cells.
In some embodiments, after reading the second storage value from the interfered cell using the increased pass voltages, the data stored in the group is copied to another group of the memory cells. In an embodiment, reading the second storage value from the interfered cell includes reading the second storage value multiple times while applying respective different values of the pass voltages to the gates of the other cells in the group, and canceling the BPD distortion includes selecting one of the read second storage values having a lowest level of the BPD distortion.
In a disclosed embodiment, the cells in the group are connected in series to one another, reading the second storage value from the interfered cell includes applying a read voltage to a gate of the interfered cell, applying pass voltages to respective gates of the other cells in the group and measuring a current flowing through the cells responsively to the applied read voltage and pass voltages, and canceling the BPD distortion includes reducing at least one of the pass voltages while not violating a predefined performance criterion, and reading the second storage value from the interfered cell using the reduced pass voltages.
In another embodiment, reading the second storage values includes processing the read second storage values so as to identify one or more over-programmed cells among the memory cells in the memory and storing information regarding the identified over-programmed cells, and canceling the BPD distortion includes processing the stored information regarding the over-programmed cells with regard to the read second storage values so as to cancel the BPD distortion. Processing the stored information may include estimating the BPD distortion based on the stored information and subtracting the estimated BPD distortion from the second storage value read from the interfered cell. In yet another embodiment, storing the data includes encoding the data with an Error Correction Code (ECC), processing the stored information includes calculating metrics for decoding the ECC based on the stored information, and processing the second storage values so as to reconstruct the data includes decoding the ECC responsively to the metrics.
In some embodiments, detecting the BPD distortion includes measuring shifts in one or more of the second storage values read from a subset of the cells in the group, which occurred after the cells were programmed, and estimating the BPD distortion responsively to the measured shifts. In an embodiment, storing the data includes encoding the data with an Error Correction Code (ECC), canceling the BPD distortion includes computing metrics for decoding the ECC based on the detected BPD distortion, and processing the second storage values so as to reconstruct the data includes decoding the ECC responsively to the metrics.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a data storage apparatus, including:
an interface, which is operative to communicate with a memory that includes multiple analog memory cells; and
a processor, which is coupled to store data in the memory by writing first storage values to the cells so as to cause the cells to hold respective electrical charge levels, to read, after storing the data, second storage values from at least some of the cells, including at least one interfered cell that belongs to a group of cells, to detect and cancel a Back Pattern Dependency (BPD) distortion caused by the electrical charge levels of one or more interfering cells in the group to at least one of the second storage values read from the at least one interfered cell, and to process the second storage values, including the at least one of the second storage values in which the BPD distortion was canceled, so as to reconstruct the data.
There is further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a data storage apparatus, including:
a memory, which includes multiple analog memory cells; and
a processor, which is coupled to store data in the memory by writing first storage values to the cells so as to cause the cells to hold respective electrical charge levels, to read, after storing the data, second storage values from at least some of the cells, including at least one interfered cell that belongs to a group of cells, to detect and cancel a Back Pattern Dependency (BPD) distortion caused by the electrical charge levels of one or more interfering cells in the group to at least one of the second storage values read from the at least one interfered cell, and to process the second storage values, including the at least one of the second storage values in which the BPD distortion was canceled, so as to reconstruct the data.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:
Embodiments of the present invention provide methods and systems for canceling Back Pattern Dependency (BPD) distortion in arrays of analog memory cells. In the embodiments that are described hereinbelow, a Memory Signal Processor (MSP) stores data in a memory that includes multiple analog memory cells by writing respective storage values to the cells, thus causing the cells to hold respective electrical charge levels. In order to read the data, the MSP reads the storage values from at least some of the cells.
The memory may contain at least one interfered memory cell, whose storage value is distorted by BPD. An interfered cell of this sort belongs to a certain group of cells, and the storage value read from the cell is distorted by BPD that is caused by one or more electrical charge levels of other cells in the group. In some embodiments, the memory cells comprise NAND Flash cells, and the group of cells comprises a NAND string. The MSP cancels the BPD distortion in the storage value read from the interfered cell, and processes the read storage values to reconstruct the data.
Several methods for canceling BPD distortion are described in detail hereinbelow. Since in many memory devices BPD distortion is severe in only a relatively small number of cells, the MSP typically invokes these methods only when necessary. For example, the MSP may encode the stored data with an Error Correction Code (ECC), and apply BPD cancellation in response to a failure of the ECC decoding process.
In some cases, as will be explained below, the BPD distortion affecting a cell in a certain row (word line) of the array is caused primarily by cells in higher rows. In some embodiments, the MSP estimates the BPD distortion in a recursive calculation, which calculates the BPD level in each row based on the previously-calculated BPD of the lower rows and on the data read from these rows.
In some embodiments, when a cell that belongs to a given NAND string is read, certain pass voltages are applied to the other word lines associated with the string. In a disclosed method, the MSP increases the pass voltages in order to reduce the BPD level. The MSP typically increases the pass voltages only for NAND strings in which BPD is suspected, so as to minimize undesirable effects that are associated with high pass voltages.
In many cases, BPD is caused primarily by over-programmed memory cells. In another disclosed method, the MSP identifies over-programmed cells, stores information regarding the identified over-programmed cells, and uses the stored information to reduce BPD when reading the interfered cells. BPD may also be caused by shifts in the charge of the interfering cells, which occurred after the interfered cells were programmed. In yet another method, the MSP estimates the threshold voltage shifts and cancels the BPD based on the estimated shifts.
The BPD cancellation methods and systems described herein increase the capacity and the data storage reliability of analog memory cell arrays. The methods and systems described herein also enable reducing the pass voltages used in analog memory cell arrays, thus reducing power dissipation, the severity of program disturbs and/or memory cell wearing.
Memory cells 24 of array 20 are arranged in a grid having multiple rows and columns. The gates of the transistors in each row are connected by word lines 28, and the transistors in each column are connected to bit lines 32. The transistors in a given column are arranged in groups, which are referred to as NAND strings 36. A given NAND string can be selected (i.e., connected to the bit line) by a string select switch 38. In a given string 28, the transistors are connected source-to-drain in series with one another. The first transistor in the string is connected to the bit line via switch 38. The last transistor is connected to ground or to another suitable baseline voltage. Each NAND string typically comprises thirty-two transistors, although any other suitable NAND string size can be used.
Array 20 is typically divided into multiple pages, i.e., groups of memory cells that are programmed and read simultaneously. Pages are sometimes sub-divided into sectors. In some embodiments, each page comprises an entire row of the array. In alternative embodiments, each row (word line) can be divided into two or more pages. For example, in some SLC devices each row is divided into two pages, one comprising the odd-order cells and the other comprising the even-order cells. In a typical implementation, a two-bit-per-cell memory device may have four pages per row, a three-bit-per-cell memory device may have six pages per row, and a four-bit-per-cell memory device may have eight pages per row.
Cells 24 are typically erased in blocks that contain multiple pages. Typically, erasure blocks comprise entire NAND strings, i.e., all cells of a given NAND string are typically erased en-bloc. Array 20 may comprise several thousand erasure blocks. In a typical two-bit-per-cell MLC device, each erasure block is on the order of thirty-two word lines, each comprising several thousand cells. Each word line of such a device is often partitioned into four pages (odd/even order cells, least/most significant bit of the cells). Three-bit-per cell devices having thirty-two word lines per erasure block would have 192 pages per erasure block, and four-bit-per-cell devices would have 256 pages per block. Alternatively, other block sizes and configurations can also be used.
Some memory devices comprise two or more separate memory cell arrays, often referred to as planes. Since each plane has a certain “busy” period between successive write operations, data can be written alternately to the different planes in order to increase programming speed.
System 40 comprises a memory device 42, which stores data in a memory cell array 44. The memory array comprises multiple analog memory cells 46. In the context of the present patent application and in the claims, the term “analog memory cell” is used to describe any memory cell that holds a continuous, analog value of a physical parameter, such as an electrical voltage or charge. In the present example, array 44 comprises a NAND Flash array, whose memory cells are arranged in NAND strings, such as in the configuration of
The charge levels stored in the cells and/or the analog voltages or currents of the cells that result from programming the cells are referred to herein collectively as analog values or storage values. Although the embodiments described herein mainly address threshold voltages, the methods and systems described herein may be used with any other suitable kind of storage values. System 40 stores data in the analog memory cells by programming the cells to assume respective memory states, which are also referred to as programming levels. The memory states are selected from a finite set of possible states, and each state corresponds to a certain nominal storage value. For example, a 2 bit/cell MLC can be programmed to assume one of four possible memory states by writing one of four possible nominal storage values into the cell.
Memory device 42 comprises a reading/writing (R/W) unit 48, which converts data for storage in the memory device to analog storage values and writes them into memory cells 46. In alternative embodiments, the R/W unit does not perform the conversion, but is provided with voltage samples, i.e., with the storage values for storage in the cells. When reading data out of array 44, R/W unit 48 converts the storage values of memory cells 46 into digital samples having a resolution of one or more bits. In order to perform read and write operations, R/W unit 48 applies the appropriate voltages to the word lines and bit lines of array 44, and operates the string-select switches of the array.
The storage and retrieval of data in and out of memory device 28 is performed by a Memory Signal Processor (MSP) 52. MSP 52 communicates with a host 56, for accepting data for storage in the memory device and for outputting data retrieved from the memory device. MSP 52 comprises an interface 60 for communicating with memory device 42, and a signal processing unit 64, which processes the data that is written into and read from device 42. In some embodiments, unit 64 encodes the data for storage using an Error Correction Code (ECC), and decodes the ECC of the data retrieved from the memory.
In some embodiments, unit 64 produces the storage values for storing in the memory cells and provides these values to R/W unit 48. In alternative embodiments, unit 64 provides the data for storage, and the conversion to storage values is carried out by the R/W unit internally to the memory device. MSP 52, and in particular unit 64, may be implemented in hardware. Alternatively, MSP 52 may comprise a microprocessor that runs suitable software, or a combination of hardware and software elements.
The configuration of
In the exemplary system configuration shown in
In order to read data from a particular memory cell, the R/W unit senses the cell's threshold voltage. The threshold voltage of a cell is commonly defined as the lowest voltage that should be applied to the cell's gate in order to cause the current between the cell's source and drain to exceed a certain value. The threshold voltage of a cell depends on the charge accumulated in its floating gate. When the desired cell is part of a NAND string, the threshold voltage of the desired cell (also referred to as the selected cell) is to be sensed, while minimizing the effects of other cells (unselected cells) in the same NAND string. In a typical read operation, the R/W unit applies suitable voltages to the word lines of the cells along the NAND string, and senses the current that flows in the bit line. (Although the description that follows refers to a single NAND string for the sake of clarity, the reading process is usually performed concurrently on multiple NAND strings.)
The R/W unit applies a certain read voltage, which depends on the read reference level, to the word line of the selected cell. The R/W unit applies another voltage, commonly referred to as a pass voltage denoted VPASS, to the other word lines of the string. The pass voltage is typically a high voltage that is intended to cause the unselected cells to conduct, and to have source-drain voltage drops that are independent of their charge levels. In other words, the pass voltage is intended to cause the bit line current to reflect the charge level of the selected cell, and to be insensitive to the charge levels of the unselected cells.
In some embodiments, the R/W unit applies the appropriate word line voltages, pre-charges the bit line, and then connects the NAND string of the cell to the bit line using the appropriate string-select switch, thus causing the bit line to discharge via the NAND string. The R/W unit measures the bit line current or voltage after a certain period of time, and determines the threshold voltage of the selected cell based on the measurement. Alternatively, the R/W unit may use any other method for measuring the threshold voltage of the selected cell by sensing the bit line.
In practice, however, the bit line current is sometimes affected not only by the threshold voltage of the selected cell, but also by the charge levels of other cells in the NAND string. As a result, the bit line current sensed by the R/W unit may be distorted and may not truly reflect the charge level of the selected cell. The distortion caused to the sensed threshold voltage of the selected cell by charge levels of unselected cells in the NAND string is referred to as Back Pattern Dependency (BPD).
BPD may be produced, for example, when the conductivity of an unselected cell is not perfectly independent of its charge level, in spite of the pass voltage applied to its word line. In particular, when a certain cell is over-programmed, i.e., when its charge level is exceedingly high, the cell may not conduct properly even when a high pass voltage is applied to its word line. Thus, over-programmed cells are a major source of BPD.
Analog memory cells are often programmed using an iterative Program and Verify (P&V) process, as is known in the art. In a typical P&V process, an incrementally-increasing sequence of programming pulses is applied to the cells. The cell voltages are read between successive programming iterations and verified against the desired programming levels. When the cells are programmed using a P&V process, the iterative verification process may inherently compensate for some of the BPD distortion.
The P&V process may compensate for BPD caused by unselected cells whose charge levels did not change substantially between the time the selected cell is programmed and the time the selected cell is read. Thus, in some cases, residual BPD is caused primarily by unselected cells that were programmed later than the selected cell. In some memory devices, the cells are programmed in an ascending order of word lines. In these applications, BPD is caused primarily by cells in word lines that are higher than the word line of the selected cell. BPD may also be caused by cells whose charge levels have changed over time, for example because of aging, program disturbs or read disturbs.
Embodiments of the present invention provide methods and systems for estimating and correcting BPD distortion effects. The methods described herein are carried out by MSP 52. In some embodiments, the MSP encodes the stored data with an ECC. Since BPD distortion is usually significant only in a relatively small number of cells in the array, the ECC decoding process of the MSP is often capable of correcting data errors that may be caused by BPD without explicitly detecting and correcting the actual BPD-related distortion. Thus, in some embodiments, the MSP invokes the methods described below only when necessary, e.g., in response to a failure of the ECC decoding process.
The method begins with the R/W unit applying a pass voltage VPASS to all the word lines of the NAND string in question, at a pass voltage application step 70. When VPASS is applied to all the word lines, the MSP measures the total amount of BPD caused by the cells in the NAND string, at a total BPD measurement step 74. The MSP senses the bit line current or voltage under these conditions, and estimates the total BPD level.
The MSP may measure the total BPD level, for example, by pre-charging the bit line that is connected to the string, and measuring the time required for the bit line to discharge through the cells of the string when VPASS is applied to the gates of all the string's cells.
The measured total BPD value, denoted BPDTOTAL, is used as an estimate of the BPD that affects the lowest word line in the string, denoted WL0. (After performing step 70, the MSP can decide which strings suffer from severe BPD and are to undergo BPD cancellation and which strings have tolerable BPD levels.)
The MSP now estimates the BPD contributed by the other word lines, at a BPD estimation step 78. The BPD level distortion in the NAND string cell that belongs to word line WLi can be estimated based on the BPD contributions of the cells in the lower word lines and on the data (programming level) read from the lower word lines by
wherein BPDWLi denotes the BPD distortion caused to the NAND string cell in word line i, LEVELWLj denotes the programming level of the NAND string cell of word line j, and f(x) denotes a function that estimates the expected BPD caused by a cell whose programming level is x. Generally, LEVELWLj may refer to the analog storage value read from the cell at word line j, or to the programming state (programming level) to which this value corresponds.
Thus, the MSP first reads the programming level of the cell in word line WL0, estimates the BPD distortion in the cell of word line WL1 (denoted BPDWL
Although the example above refers to a scenario in which the memory is programmed in ascending order of word lines, the method of
Alternatively, the BPD distortion in the cell of word line i can be estimated by reading the levels of the cells in word lines i+1, i+2, . . . N, wherein N denotes the index of the last word line in the string, and calculating
The estimated BPD distortion levels can be subtracted from the storage values read from the cells. Alternatively, the estimated distortion levels can be taken into account when calculating likelihood metrics of the data stored the cells. Such metrics may subsequently be used for soft decoding of an Error Correction Code (ECC) that encodes the data.
The method begins with system 40 intending to read a certain target memory page, which is stored in a group of memory cells along a certain word line in the memory cell array. The word line belongs to a certain set of NAND strings. The R/W unit applies a default value of the pass voltage VPASS to the unselected word lines of the NAND strings, at a default VPASS application step 80. The MSP then reads the memory page, at a reading step 84.
The MSP checks whether the read page is suspected of suffering from BPD, at a BPD checking step 88. The MSP can evaluate any suitable condition that indicates whether a page is likely to suffer from BPD. For example, the MSP may regard any page whose ECC decoding fails as a suspect. Alternatively, the MSP may encode the data with an error detection code, such as a Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC), and regard read pages whose CRC fails as suspects. In the present context, an ECC is also considered to be a type of error detection code.
Additionally or alternatively, the MSP may maintain information regarding locations of over-programmed cells in the memory array. The MSP may regard a page as a suspect if the unselected word lines belonging to the same NAND strings as the page contain over-programmed cells. In some embodiments, the MSP may consider only over-programmed cells that were programmed later than the page in question (e.g., cells that are located in word lines that are higher than the word line of the read page). Several exemplary techniques for collecting and storing information regarding over-programmed cells are described further below.
If the read operation is successful or if the read page is not suspected of suffering from BPD, the MSP regards the page as successfully-read, at a read success step 92. Otherwise, the MSP initiates an iterative process that gradually increases the pass voltages of some or all of the unselected cells, attempting to reduce the BPD level.
The MSP checks whether a maximum allowed number of iterations has been performed, at an iteration number checking step 96. If the maximum number of iterations has already been performed and the page is still suspected of suffering from BPD, the MSP declares a read failure, at a read failure step 100.
Otherwise, the MSP instructs the R/W unit to increase the pass voltages applied to unselected word lines, at a VPASS increasing step 104. The R/W unit increases the pass voltages, such as by a predetermined step size. For example, the default pass voltage may be set at 6V, and the pass voltage may be increased by 0.5V in each iteration. Alternatively, any other suitable default value and step size can be used. The step size may be fixed or variable. After increasing the pass voltages, the method loops back to reading step 84 above. The MSP re-reads the page with the increased pass voltages, attempting to reduce the BPD level.
In some embodiments, the maximum number of iterations allowed in step 96 is two. In these embodiments, the pass voltage is increased only once and the page is re-read only once.
In some embodiments, the MSP increases only the pass voltages applied to the word lines that were programmed later than the read page, assuming that BPD may only be caused by cells in those word lines. Word lines that were programmed before the page in question are read with the default pass voltage. Alternatively, the MSP may increase the pass voltages of all unselected word lines, or of any desired subset of the unselected word lines. For example, when information regarding the locations of over-programmed cells is available, the MSP may increase only the pass voltages of word lines that contain over-programmed cells.
Increasing pass voltages may sometimes have undesirable effects. For example, higher pass voltages may increase the power dissipation of the memory device, cause higher read disturbs and/or increase the wearing of cells. Since the method of
In some embodiments, the R/W unit and the MSP carry out the method of
In some embodiments, when a certain VPASS value is known to perform well in a given group of cells (e.g., an erasure block), the MSP stores this VPASS value for future use. For example, when the method of
In some embodiments, after reading the page using the increased pass voltages, the MSP copies the data to another page and resets the pass voltages to their default values. Using this technique, the data can be accessed again at a later time if necessary, without the need to use high pass voltages. Alternatively, the MSP may copy the data of the entire erasure block to another block, or re-program the data in the same cells (typically after erasing the block).
The technique of modifying the pass voltages responsively to the BPD level can also be used for reducing the pass voltages, and thus reducing power dissipation, program disturbs and wearing of cells. For example, the MSP may gradually reduce the pass voltages applied to the unselected word lines, as long as the reading performance remains acceptable, i.e., as long as a certain performance-related criterion is not violated. For example, the MSP may reduce VPASS until read errors begin to appear or until the Bit Error Rate (BER) of the read data reaches a certain threshold. Using this method, each group of cells (e.g., each erasure block) can be read using the minimal pass voltage that still ensures tolerable performance.
The method begins with the MSP identifying over-programmed memory cells by reading the threshold voltages of cells in array 44, at an over-programmed cell identification step 110. Detection of over-programmed cells may be performed at any time during the memory device's lifetime. For example, the MSP may detect over-programmed cells immediately after programming, such as by using the last verification iteration of the P&V process that programs the cells. Additionally or alternatively, the MSP may detect over-programmed cells during read operations. Further additionally or alternatively, the MSP may run a background task that identifies over-programmed cells during idle periods of system 40. Identification of over-programmed cells can be performed periodically for all cells, after each memory access operation, in response to a certain event (e.g., failure of an ECC or other error detection code) or using any other suitable logic.
The MSP stores over-programming information regarding the identified over-programmed cells, at an over-programming information storage step 114. The MSP may collect and store any suitable information regarding the over-programmed cells identified at step 110, such as the locations of the over-programmed cells, quantitative measures indicative of the amount or severity of over-programming, information pertaining to groups of cells (e.g., the number of over-programmed cells in a given NAND string or erasure block) and/or any other suitable information.
The information can be stored in any suitable location, such as in some of the memory cells of array 44 or in a different memory. In some embodiments, the MSP compresses the information regarding over-programmed cells before storage, in order to reduce the amount of memory needed for storing the information.
When reading data from the memory cells in the array, the MSP processes the stored over-programming information so as to reduce the BPD-related distortion in the read cells, at a BPD reduction step 118. For example, when reading a set of potentially-interfered cells, the MSP may estimate the BPD distortion caused to the potentially-interfered cells by the over-programmed cells, and subtract the distortion from the threshold voltages read from the potentially-interfered cells.
In some embodiments, the ECC decoding process used by the MSP operates on quality metrics associated with the values read from the cells. In these embodiments, the MSP may calculate the quality metrics of the potentially-interfered cells based on the over-programming information. For example, the ECC decoding process may accept erasures, which indicate values of poor quality. The MSP may identify that some of the potentially-interfered cells have poor reliability because of BPD, and mark the values read from these cells as “erasures” to the ECC decoding process.
As yet another example, the ECC decoding process may operate on soft quality metrics, such as on Log Likelihood Ratios (LLRs). The MSP can estimate statistical characteristics of the BPD distortion, and calculate the soft quality metrics of data values of the potentially-interfered cells based on the BPD statistics. Additionally or alternatively, the MSP may use any other suitable method for reducing the BPD distortion in the potentially-interfered cells using the stored information regarding over-programmed cells. Some aspects of using quality metrics for decoding ECC in memory arrays are described in PCT Application WO 2007/132457, entitled “Combined Distortion Estimation and Error Correction Coding for Memory Devices, filed May 10, 2007, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
In some embodiments, the MSP may search for potentially-interfering cells (which may or may not be over-programmed), read the threshold voltages of the potentially-interfering cells and use the read threshold voltages for reducing or canceling the BPD distortion in potentially-interfered cells. For example, as explained in the description of
The BPD reduction techniques used for implementing step 118 can also be used in conjunction with other BPD identification methods, such as when BPD is estimated using the methods of
The method begins with the MSP estimating the threshold voltage shifts in the memory cells of a given NAND string, at a shift estimation step 120. (Although the method description refers to a certain NAND string, the method is typically carried out during normal read operations performed on the memory, and is performed for multiple NAND strings in parallel.)
The MSP estimates the threshold voltage shifts that occurred since the cells were programmed, e.g., due to aging. For example, the MSP may apply ECC decoding so as to detect the programming level of each cell, and compare the threshold voltage read from the cell to the nominal threshold value associated with the cell's programming level. Alternatively, the MSP can estimate the threshold voltage shifts using any other suitable technique.
The MSP then estimates the BPD distortion that may be caused by the threshold voltage shifts to potentially-interfered cells, at a BPD estimation step 124. Typically, the MSP assumes that the threshold voltage shifts of a cell in word line WLn may cause BPD primarily in the cells that are located in word lines WLn+1, Wn+2, . . . of the same NAND string. The MSP then corrects the estimated BPD distortion in the potentially-interfered cells, at a BPD correction step 128. The MSP may correct the BPD distortion using any of the techniques described above, such as by directly subtracting the BPD errors from the values read from the potentially-interfered cells, or by calculating quality metrics of the potentially-interfered cells based on the estimated BPD error.
Since the methods described herein reduce BPD distortion effects, the MSP may reduce the pass voltages (VPASS) that are applied to the unselected word lines of the NAND string when using any of these methods. Thus, the methods described herein enable reducing the memory device power dissipation, program disturbs and/or cell wearing. Alternatively, the BPD cancellation methods described herein can enable increasing the voltage levels of the cells, allowing a higher voltage window, more reliable operation and/or a higher number of programming levels (i.e., more information bits per cell).
Although the embodiments described herein mainly address reducing BPD error in NAND strings, the methods and systems described herein can also be used for reducing distortion in any other suitable group of memory cells. Although the embodiments described herein mainly address writing and reading data in solid-state memory devices, the principles of the present invention can also be used for programming and reading other types of storage devices, such as Hard Disk Drives (HDD).
It will thus be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and sub-combinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/995,801, filed Jan. 15, 2008, which is a national phase application of PCT Application WO 2007/132453 claiming priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/886,429, filed Jan. 24, 2007, whose disclosures are all incorporated herein by reference. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/891,569, filed Feb. 26, 2007 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/938,192, filed May 16, 2007, whose disclosures are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3668631 | Griffith et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3668632 | Oldham | Jun 1972 | A |
4058851 | Scheuneman | Nov 1977 | A |
4112502 | Scheuneman | Sep 1978 | A |
4394763 | Nagano et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4413339 | Riggle et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4556961 | Iwahashi et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4558431 | Satoh | Dec 1985 | A |
4608687 | Dutton | Aug 1986 | A |
4654847 | Dutton | Mar 1987 | A |
4661929 | Aoki et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4768171 | Tada | Aug 1988 | A |
4811285 | Walker et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4899342 | Potter et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4910706 | Hyatt | Mar 1990 | A |
4993029 | Galbraith et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5056089 | Furuta et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5077722 | Geist et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5126808 | Montalvo et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5163021 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5172338 | Mehrotta et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5182558 | Mayo | Jan 1993 | A |
5182752 | DeRoo et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5191584 | Anderson | Mar 1993 | A |
5200959 | Gross et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5237535 | Mielke et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5272669 | Samachisa et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276649 | Hoshita et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5287469 | Tsuboi | Feb 1994 | A |
5365484 | Cleveland et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5388064 | Khan | Feb 1995 | A |
5416646 | Shirai | May 1995 | A |
5416782 | Wells et al. | May 1995 | A |
5446854 | Khalidi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450424 | Okugaki et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5469444 | Endoh et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473753 | Wells et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479170 | Cauwenberghs et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5508958 | Fazio et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519831 | Holzhammer | May 1996 | A |
5532962 | Auclair et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541886 | Hasbun | Jul 1996 | A |
5600677 | Citta et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5638320 | Wong et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657332 | Auclair et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675540 | Roohparvar | Oct 1997 | A |
5682352 | Wong et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687114 | Khan | Nov 1997 | A |
5696717 | Koh | Dec 1997 | A |
5726649 | Tamaru et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726934 | Tran et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742752 | De Koning | Apr 1998 | A |
5748533 | Dunlap et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748534 | Dunlap et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751637 | Chen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761402 | Kaneda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5798966 | Keeney | Aug 1998 | A |
5799200 | Brant et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801985 | Roohparvar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838832 | Barnsley | Nov 1998 | A |
5860106 | Domen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867114 | Barbir | Feb 1999 | A |
5867428 | Ishii et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867429 | Chen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877986 | Harari et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889937 | Tamagawa | Mar 1999 | A |
5901089 | Korsh et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909449 | So et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912906 | Wu et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930167 | Lee et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937424 | Leak et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942004 | Cappelletti | Aug 1999 | A |
5946716 | Karp et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5969986 | Wong et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982668 | Ishii et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991517 | Harari et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995417 | Chen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009014 | Hollmer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009016 | Ishii et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023425 | Ishii et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034891 | Norman | Mar 2000 | A |
6040993 | Chen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041430 | Yamauchi | Mar 2000 | A |
6073204 | Lakhani et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101614 | Gonzales et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128237 | Shirley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134140 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134143 | Norman | Oct 2000 | A |
6134631 | Jennings | Oct 2000 | A |
6141261 | Patti | Oct 2000 | A |
6151246 | So et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157573 | Ishii et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166962 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169691 | Pasotti et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178466 | Gilbertson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185134 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209113 | Roohparvar | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212654 | Lou et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219276 | Parker | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219447 | Lee et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222762 | Guterman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230233 | Lofgren et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240458 | Gilbertson | May 2001 | B1 |
6259627 | Wong | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275419 | Guterman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278632 | Chevallier | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279069 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288944 | Kawamura | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292394 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301151 | Engh et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304486 | Yano | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307776 | So et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6804805 | Rub | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6317363 | Guterman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317364 | Guterman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345004 | Omura et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360346 | Miyauchi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363008 | Wong | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363454 | Lakhani et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366496 | Torelli et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385092 | Ishii et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392932 | Ishii et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396742 | Korsh et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397364 | Barkan | May 2002 | B1 |
6405323 | Lin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405342 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418060 | Yong et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442585 | Dean et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445602 | Kokudo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452838 | Ishii et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456528 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466476 | Wong et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467062 | Barkan | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469931 | Ban et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490236 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522580 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525952 | Araki et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6532556 | Wong et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538922 | Khalid et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549464 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553510 | Pekny | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558967 | Wong | May 2003 | B1 |
6560152 | Cernea | May 2003 | B1 |
6567311 | Ishii et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6577539 | Iwahashi | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584012 | Banks | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6615307 | Roohparvar | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621739 | Gonzales et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6640326 | Buckingham et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643169 | Rudelic et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6646913 | Micheloni et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6678192 | Gongwer et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683811 | Ishii et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687155 | Nagasue | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6707748 | Lin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708257 | Bao | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714449 | Khalid | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717847 | Chen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731557 | Beretta | May 2004 | B2 |
6738293 | Iwahashi | May 2004 | B1 |
6751766 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757193 | Chen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6774808 | Hibbs et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781877 | Cernea et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6807095 | Chen et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807101 | Ooishi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809964 | Moschopoulos et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6819592 | Noguchi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829167 | Tu et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845052 | Ho et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6851018 | Wyatt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6851081 | Yamamoto | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856546 | Guterman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862218 | Guterman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870767 | Rudelic et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870773 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873552 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879520 | Hosono et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882567 | Wong | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6894926 | Guterman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907497 | Hosono et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925009 | Noguchi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930925 | Guo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934188 | Roohparvar | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937511 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958938 | Noguchi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963505 | Cohen | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972993 | Conley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988175 | Lasser | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992932 | Cohen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999344 | Hosono et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002843 | Guterman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006379 | Noguchi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012835 | Gonzales et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020017 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023735 | Ban et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031210 | Park et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031214 | Tran | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031216 | You | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039846 | Hewitt et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042766 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054193 | Wong | May 2006 | B1 |
7054199 | Lee et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057958 | So et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065147 | Ophir et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068539 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071849 | Zhang | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072222 | Ishii et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079555 | Baydar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088615 | Guterman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099194 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102924 | Chen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113432 | Mokhlesi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7130210 | Bathul et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139192 | Wong | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139198 | Guterman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145805 | Ishii et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151692 | Wu | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170781 | So et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170802 | Cernea et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173859 | Hemink | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177184 | Chen | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177195 | Gonzales et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177199 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177200 | Ronen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184338 | Nagakawa et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187195 | Kim | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7187592 | Guterman et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190614 | Wu | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193898 | Cernea | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193921 | Choi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196644 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7196928 | Chen | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196933 | Shibata | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197594 | Raz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200062 | Kinsely et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210077 | Brandenberger et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221592 | Nazarian | May 2007 | B2 |
7224613 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7231474 | Helms et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7231562 | Ohlhoff et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243275 | Gongwer et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254690 | Rao | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7254763 | Aadsen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257027 | Park | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259987 | Chen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266026 | Gongwer et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7266069 | Chu | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269066 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272757 | Stocken | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274611 | Roohparvar | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277355 | Tanzawa | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7280398 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7280409 | Misumi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7280415 | Hwang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283399 | Ishii et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289344 | Chen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7301807 | Khalid et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301817 | Li et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308525 | Lasser et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310255 | Chan | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310269 | Shibata | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310271 | Lee | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310272 | Mokhlesi et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7310347 | Lasser | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321509 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328384 | Kulkarni et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7342831 | Mokhlesi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343330 | Boesjes et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7345924 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7345928 | Li | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349263 | Kim et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356755 | Fackenthal | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363420 | Lin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365671 | Anderson | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7388781 | Litsyn et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7397697 | So et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405974 | Yaoi et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405979 | Ishii et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408804 | Hemink et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7408810 | Aritome et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7409473 | Conley et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7409623 | Baker et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420847 | Li | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433231 | Aritome | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7433697 | Karaoguz et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7434111 | Sugiura et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437498 | Ronen | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440324 | Mokhlesi | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440331 | Hemink | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441067 | Gorobetz et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447970 | Wu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7450421 | Mokhlesi et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453737 | Ha | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457163 | Hemink | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457897 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7460410 | Nagai et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7460412 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466592 | Mitani et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468907 | Kang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468911 | Lutze et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471581 | Tran et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7483319 | Brown | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487329 | Hepkin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7492641 | Hosono et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508710 | Mokhlesi | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7526711 | Orio | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7539061 | Lee | May 2009 | B2 |
7539062 | Doyle | May 2009 | B2 |
7551492 | Kim | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558109 | Brandman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7558839 | McGovern | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7568135 | Cornwell et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570520 | Kamei et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590002 | Mokhlesi et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593259 | Kim et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594093 | Kancherla | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7596707 | Vemula | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7609787 | Jahan et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613043 | Cornwell et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616498 | Mokhlesi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7619918 | Aritome | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631245 | Lasser | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633798 | Sarin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633802 | Mokhlesi | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639532 | Roohparvar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644347 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656734 | Thorp et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660158 | Aritome | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660183 | Ware et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7661054 | Huffman et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665007 | Yang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680987 | Clark et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7733712 | Walston et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7742351 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761624 | Karamcheti et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7810017 | Radke | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7848149 | Gonzales et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7869273 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885119 | Li | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928497 | Yaegashi | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930515 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945825 | Cohen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7978516 | Olbrich et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8014094 | Jin | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8037380 | Cagno et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8040744 | Gorobets et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20010002172 | Tanaka et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010006479 | Ikehashi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020038440 | Barkan | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020056064 | Kidorf et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020118574 | Gongwer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133684 | Anderson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020166091 | Kidorf et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174295 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196510 | Hietala et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002348 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030103400 | Van Tran | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030161183 | Van Tran | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030189856 | Cho et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040057265 | Mirabel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057285 | Cernea et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083333 | Chang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083334 | Chang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040105311 | Cernea et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114437 | Li | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040160842 | Fukiage | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040223371 | Roohparvar | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050007802 | Gerpheide | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013165 | Ban | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024941 | Lasser et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050024978 | Ronen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030788 | Parkinson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086574 | Fackenthal | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050121436 | Kamitani et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157555 | Ono et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050162913 | Chen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169051 | Khalid et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189649 | Maruyama et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213393 | Lasser | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050224853 | Ohkawa | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240745 | Iyer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243626 | Ronen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004952 | Lasser | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028875 | Avraham et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028877 | Meir | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060101193 | Murin | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106972 | Gorobets et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107136 | Gongwer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129750 | Lee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133141 | Gorobets | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156189 | Tomlin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179334 | Brittain et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190699 | Lee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203546 | Lasser | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218359 | Sanders et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221692 | Chen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060221705 | Hemink et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060221714 | Li et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239077 | Park et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239081 | Roohparvar | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256620 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256626 | Werner et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256891 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271748 | Jain et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285392 | Incarnati et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285396 | Ha | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006013 | Moshayedi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019481 | Park | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033581 | Tomlin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047314 | Goda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047326 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050536 | Kolokowsky | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058446 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061502 | Lasser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067667 | Ikeuchi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074093 | Lasser | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086239 | Litsyn et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086260 | Sinclair | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089034 | Litsyn et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091677 | Lasser et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091694 | Lee et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103978 | Conley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103986 | Chen | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109845 | Chen | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109849 | Chen | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115726 | Cohen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118713 | Guterman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143378 | Gorobets | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143531 | Atri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159889 | Kang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159892 | Kang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159907 | Kwak | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168837 | Murin | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171714 | Wu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183210 | Choi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189073 | Aritome | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195602 | Fong et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206426 | Mokhlesi | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208904 | Hsieh et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226599 | Motwani | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236990 | Aritome | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253249 | Kang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070256620 | Viggiano et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263455 | Cornwell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266232 | Rodgers et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271424 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280000 | Fujiu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291571 | Balasundaram | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297234 | Cernea et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010395 | Mylly et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025121 | Tanzawa | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043535 | Roohparvar | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049504 | Kasahara et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049506 | Guterman | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052446 | Lasser et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055993 | Lee | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080243 | Edahiro et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082730 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089123 | Chae et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104309 | Cheon et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104312 | Lasser | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109590 | Jung et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115017 | Jacobson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123420 | Brandman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126686 | Sokolov et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130341 | Shalvi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148115 | Sokolov et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151618 | Sharon et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151667 | Miu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158958 | Sokolov et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181001 | Shalvi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198650 | Shalvi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198654 | Toda | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209116 | Caulkins | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209304 | Winarski et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215798 | Sharon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219050 | Shalvi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239093 | Easwar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080239812 | Abiko et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253188 | Aritome | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263262 | Sokolov et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263676 | Mo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270730 | Lasser et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282106 | Shalvi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288714 | Salomon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090013233 | Radke | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024905 | Shalvi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034337 | Aritome | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043831 | Antonopoulos et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043951 | Shalvi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049234 | Oh et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090073762 | Lee et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086542 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089484 | Chu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091979 | Shalvi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094930 | Schwoerer | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106485 | Anholt | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112949 | Ergan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132755 | Radke | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144600 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150894 | Huang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157950 | Selinger | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157964 | Kasorla et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158126 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168524 | Golov et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172257 | Prins et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172261 | Prins et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193184 | Yu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199074 | Sommer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204824 | Lin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204872 | Yu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213653 | Perlmutter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213654 | Perlmutter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225595 | Kim | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090265509 | Klein | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300227 | Nochimowski et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323412 | Mokhlesi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327608 | Eschmann | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017650 | Chin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034022 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057976 | Lasser | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061151 | Miwa et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082883 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083247 | Kanevsky et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110580 | Takashima | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131697 | Alrod et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142268 | Aritome | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142277 | Yang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169547 | Ou | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169743 | Vogan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174847 | Paley et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110066793 | Burd | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075482 | Shepard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110107049 | Kwon et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110199823 | Bar-Or et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110302354 | Miller | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0783754 | Jul 1997 | EP |
1434236 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1605509 | Dec 2005 | EP |
9610256 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9828745 | Jul 1998 | WO |
02100112 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03100791 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2007046084 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007132452 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132453 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132456 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132457 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132457 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007132458 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007146010 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008026203 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008053472 | May 2008 | WO |
2008053473 | May 2008 | WO |
2008068747 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008077284 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008083131 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008099958 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008111058 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008124760 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008139441 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009037691 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009037697 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009038961 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009050703 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009053961 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009053962 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009053963 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009063450 | May 2009 | WO |
2009072100 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072101 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072102 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072103 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072104 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072105 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009074978 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009074979 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009078006 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009095902 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2011024015 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080219050 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60891569 | Feb 2007 | US | |
60938192 | May 2007 | US | |
60886429 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11995801 | US | |
Child | 12037487 | US |