1. Technical Field
This invention relates to methods and devices for improved ionization, collection, focusing and transmission of ions, generated at or near atmospheric pressure, of gaseous analytes or analytes on surfaces for introduction into a mass spectrometer and other gas-phase ion analyzers and detectors.
2. Description of Related Art
The generation of ions at or near atmospheric pressure is accomplished using a variety of means, including, electrospray (ES), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), atmospheric pressure matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (AP-MALDI), discharge ionization, 63Ni sources, inductively coupled plasma ionization, and photoionization. A general characteristic of these atmospheric or near atmospheric ionization sources is the dispersive nature of the ions once produced. Needle sources such as electrospray and APCI disperse ions radially from the axis in the high electric fields emanating from needle tips. Aerosol techniques disperse ions in the radial flow of fluid emanating from tubes and nebulizers. Even desorption techniques such as atmospheric pressure MALDI will disperse ions in a solid angle from a surface. The radial cross-section of many dispersive sources can be as large as 5 or 10 centimeters in diameter.
As a consequence of a wide variety of dispersive processes, efficient sampling of ions from atmospheric pressure sources to small cross-sectional targets or through small cross-sectional apertures and tubes (usually less than 1 mm) into a mass spectrometer (MS) or other sensor capable of detecting and identifying ions becomes quite problematic. This problem becomes amplified if the source of ions is removed from the regions directly adjacent to the aperture. Consequently, there is a tremendous loss of ions prior to entry into the sensor for detection and identification, as shown by the following examples.
The simplest approach to sampling dispersive atmospheric sources is to position the source on axis with a sampling aperture or tube. The sampling efficiency of simple plate apertures is generally less than 1 ion in 104. U.S. Pat. No. 4,209,696 (1980) to Fite discloses an electrospray source with a pinhole aperture, while U.S. Pat. No. 5,965,884 (1999) and World patent 99/63576 (1999) both to Laiko et al. discloses an atmospheric pressure MALDI source configured with a pinhole or aperture in a plate. An atmospheric pressure source disclosed in Japanese patent 04215329 (1994) by Kazuaki et al. is also representative of this approach. In general, these methods are severely restricted by the need for precise aperture alignment and source positioning, and characterized by very poor sampling efficiencies.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,534,765 (2003) and World patent 01/33605 (1999) both to Robb et al. discloses a low field photoionization source developed for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) applications. The use of this low field photo-ionization source has lead to some improvement in sampling efficiency from atmospheric pressure sources, but these sources also suffer from a lower concentration of reagent ions when compared to traditional APCI sources.
A wide variety of ion source configurations utilize conical skimmer apertures in order to improve collection efficiency over planar devices. This approach to focusing ions from atmospheric sources is limited by the acceptance angle of the electrostatic fields generated at the cone. Generally, source position relative to the cone is also critical to performance, although somewhat better than planar apertures. Conical apertures are the primary inlet geometry for commercial inductively coupled plasma (ICP/MS) with closely coupled and axially aligned torches. Examples of conical-shaped apertures are prevalent in ES and APCI (U.S. Pat. No. 5,756,994), and ICP (U.S. Pat. No. 4,999,492) inlets. As with planar apertures, source positioning relative to the aperture is critical to performance and collection efficiency is quite low.
Another focusing alternative utilizes a plate lens with a large hole in front of an aperture plate or tube for transferring sample into the vacuum system. The aperture plate is generally held at a high potential difference relative to the plate lens. This approach is referred to as the “Plate-Well” design which is disclosed, with apertures, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,531,056 (1985) to Labowsky et al., 5,412,209 (1995) to Covey et al., and 5,747,799 (1998) to Franzen; and with tubes as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,542,293 (1985) to Fenn et al., 5,559,326 (1996) to Goodley et al., and 6,060,705 (2000) to Whitehouse et al.
This configuration creates a potential well that penetrates into the source region and shows a significant improvement in collection efficiency relative to plate or cone apertures. But it has a clear disadvantage in that the potential well resulting from the field penetration is not independent of ion source position, or potential. Furthermore, high voltage needles can diminish this well and off-axis sources can affect the shape and collection efficiency of the well. Optimal positions are highly dependent upon flow (liquid and, concurrent and counter-current gas flows) and voltages. This type of design is reasonably well suited for small volume sources such as nanospray while larger flow sources are less efficient. Because this geometry is generally preferred over plates and cones, it is seen in most types of atmospheric source designs. Several embodiments of atmospheric pressure sources have incorporated grids in order to control the sampling of gas-phase ions. U.S. Pat. No. 5,436,446 (1995) to Jarrell et al. utilized a grid that reflected lower mass ions into a collection cone and passed large particles through the grid. This modulated system was intended to allow grounded needles and collection cones or apertures, while the grid would float at high alternating potentials. This device had limitations with the duty cycle of ion collection in a modulating field (non-continuous sample introduction) and spatial and positioning restrictions relative to the sampling aperture. U.S. Pat. No. 6,207,954 (2001) to Andrien et al. used grids as counter electrodes for multiple corona discharge sources configured in geometries and at potentials to generate ions of opposite charge and monitor their interactions and reactions. This specialized reaction source was not configured with high field ratios across the grids and was not intended for high transmission and collection, rather for generation of very specific reactant ions. An alternative atmospheric pressure device disclosed in Japanese patent 10088798 (1999) to Yoshiaki utilized on-axis hemispherical grids in the second stage of pressure reduction. Although the approach is similar to the present device in concept, it is severely limited by gas discharge that may occur at these low pressures if higher voltages are applied to the electrodes and the fact that most of the ions (>99%) formed at atmospheric pressure are lost at the cone-aperture from the movement from atmospheric pressure into the first pumping stage.
A presentation by Cody et al. entitled “DART™: Direct Analysis in Real Time for Drugs, Explosives, Chemical Agents and More . . . ” made in 2004 (American Society for Mass Spectrometry Sanibel Conference on Mass Spectrometry in Forensic Science and Counter-terrorism, Clearwater, Fla., Jan. 28-Feb. 1, 2004) and U.S. patent publication 2005/0056775 (2005), U.S. Pat. No. 6,949,741 and foreign patent application WO 04/098743 to Cody et al. has disclosed an ionization source and detection technique that incorporates a gas-discharge atmospheric ionization source configured as a tube or gun with a grided aperture or opening at the exit of the tube leading into a low-field reaction region upstream of the sampling aperture of a mass spectrometer for the purpose of ionizing gas-phase molecules through the means of atmospheric pressure ionization.
Grids are also commonly utilized for sampling ions from atmospheric ion sources utilized in ion mobility spectrometry (IMS). Generally, for IMS analysis, ions are pulsed through grids down a drift tube to a detector as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,239,428 (2001) to Kunz. Great effort is made to create a planar plug of ions in order to maximize resolution of components in the mobility spectrum. These devices generally are not continuous, nor are they operated such that ions are focused into apertures or capillaries at the atmospheric-vacuum interface of mass analyzers.
The conclusion is that a highly efficient sample or analyte ionization source is needed that allows collection and transmission of most sample ions to the inlet of mass spectrometers, ion mobility spectrometers or other sensors. Such a source, lacking positional dependence is presented herein.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is the configuration of an atmospheric pressure remote reagent chemical ionization source (R2CIS), coupled with a field-free transfer region leading to a reaction region to facilitate efficient sample ionization and collection. The novelty of this device is the manner of isolation of the electric fields in the reagent ion generation region from the electric fields of the reaction or sample ionization region and those in the product ion-sampling region. This is accomplished through the utilization of laminated lenses populated with a plurality of openings that efficiently pass ions from one region to another without significant penetration of the electric fields from the adjacent regions. Another novel feature is the electronic control of the R2CIS, enabling production of different reagent ion types and quantities by simple adjustment. An alternative embodiment of this invention is the configuration of a remote ionization source with a low-field reaction region and sampling capillary configured as a portable or benchtop chemical detector.
Hence, one object of the present invention is to increase the collection efficiency of ions and/or charged particles at a collector, or through an aperture or tube into a vacuum system. This is accomplished by creating a very small cross-sectional area beam of ions and/or charged particles from highly dispersed atmospheric pressure ion sources. The present invention has a significant advantage over prior art in that it demonstrates that the counter electrodes for APCI needles do not have to be the plate lens as practiced with most conventional sources. Instead, a High Transmission Element (HTE) separates the reagent ion generation region from the sample ion formation region and provides the needed ion focusing. The HTE can be of laminated construction, and is termed L-HTE and is used for illustrative purposes. This allows precise shaping of fields in both regions, thereby permitting high transmission efficiencies of reagent ions and significant compression of the sample ion stream. The aerosol and plasma can be generated remotely and ions can be allowed to drift toward the L-HTE with a substantial portion of the ions passing through the L-HTE into low-field or field-free regions at atmospheric or lower pressures. Ions can be generated in large ion source regions without losses to walls. Droplets have longer times to evaporate and/or desorb neutrals or ions without loss from the sampling stream. Source temperatures can be lower because rapid evaporation is not required, thereby limiting thermal decomposition of labile compounds.
Another object of the present invention is to have sample ion collection efficiency be independent of reagent ion source position. With the present invention there is no need for precise mechanical needle alignment or positioning relative to collectors, apertures, or tubes. Ions generated at any position in the reaction and sample ion-sampling regions are transmitted to the collector, aperture, or tube with similar efficiency. No existing technology has such positional and potential independence of the source. The precise and constant geometry, and alignment of the focusing well with sampling apertures will not change with needle placement. The electrostatic fields inside the reaction, sample ion-sampling, and deep-well regions (focusing side) will not change, even if the fields generated by the R2CIS are varied.
Another object of the present invention is to allow independence of the source type, thus allowing the device to transmit and collect ions from any atmospheric (or near atmospheric) pressure ionization source, including atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, inductively coupled plasma discharge sources, Ni63 sources, spray ionization sources, induction ionization sources and photoionization sources.
Another object of this invention is to provide a device that can sample ions of a single polarity with extremely high efficiency.
Another object of the present invention is to electronically control the gas discharge in the R2CIS such that positive, negative or a mixture of positive and negative reagent ions is formed continuously.
Another object of the present invention is to efficiently collect and/or divert a flow of ions from more than one source by simultaneously introducing mass calibrants from a separate source and analytes from a different source at a different potential.
Another object of the present invention is to efficiently transmit ions to a plurality of target positions, thus allowing part of the sample to be collected on a surface while another part of the sample is being introduced through an aperture into a mass spectrometer or other analytical device to be analyzed.
Another object of the present invention is to improve the efficiency of multiplexed inlets from both multiple macroscopic sources and microchip arrays, particularly those developed with multiple needle arrays for APCI. The positional independence of this invention makes it compatible with a wide variety of needle array technologies.
Another object of this invention is to remove larger droplets and particles from aerosol sources using a counter-flow of gas to prevent contamination of deep-well lenses, funnel aperture walls, apertures, inlets to tubes, vacuum components, and the like.
A major advantage of the present device is its capability to efficiently deliver reagent ions to samples, which may be gases, liquids, solutions, particulates, or solids.
Another advantage of the present invention is its capability to generate a large excess of reagent ions in a remote region and to then introduce a high percentage of these reagent ions into the reaction region to drive the equilibrium of the reaction between reagent ions and sample far toward completion.
Another advantage of the present invention is the lack of limitations to the reaction volume. The reaction volume may literally be hundreds of cm3 and the sampling losses associated with conventional sources will not be experienced because of the highly efficient use of electric fields to collect and move ions.
Another advantage of this ion source is the capability for neutrals and reagent ions to reside in the reaction region, in the presence of low electrostatic fields, for relatively long durations, even in a large volume, thus allowing reactions with very slow reaction kinetics to proceed well towards completion.
Another advantage of the present device is its capability to utilize the tremendous compression capabilities of funnel-well optics to compress substantially all of the ions generated in the reaction and funnel regions into a small cross-sectional area.
Another advantage of the present invention is its capability to heat a sample on a surface by means of radiant heat from a light source, such as an infrared light, or a laser, inducing volatilization the sample, forming gas-phase molecules, and then reacting these gas-phase molecules with reagent ions to form gas-phase sample ions which are then delivered into a gas-phase ion analyzer, such as a mass spectrometer or ion mobility analyzer.
Another advantage of the present invention is its capability to deposit reagent ions on a surface thereby charging-up sample chemical species on the surface and thereafter using the electric potentials of the device to collect those charged sample ions into a low-field region, and to subsequently move those gas-phase sample ions into a gas-phase ion analyzer through an aperture or capillary tube while controlling the various operations by use of a computer to thereby optimize the timing of each event, and synchronizing all events.
One of the most important advantages of the R2CIS when compared to conventional APCI sources is its relative lack of recombination losses in the reaction region.
a to 10f are cross-sectional illustrations of a number of alternative embodiments of R2CISs for the generation of reagent ions and the field-free transfer of ions in which:
a shows an axial needle electrode and a disk-shaped counter-electrode with a disk-shaped field-shielding element downstream from the discharge region and held at a potential between the needle and counter electrodes to create a field-free transfer region downstream from the discharge region;
b shows an axial needle electrode and a disk-shaped counter-electrode with a disk-shaped field-shielding element downstream with an annular opening held at a potential between the needle and counter electrodes to create a field-free transfer region downstream from the discharge region;
c shows an axial hollow needle electrode and a disk-shaped counter-electrode with a disk-shaped field-shielding element downstream with an annular opening held at a potential between the needle and counter electrodes to create a field-free transfer region downstream from the discharge region;
d shows two off-axis discharge electrodes with a disk-shaped field-shielding element downstream held at a potential between the two discharge electrodes to create a field-free transfer region downstream from the discharge region
e shows two off-axis discharge electrodes positioned outside of an insulated transfer tube with a disk-shaped field-shielding element downstream held at a potential between the two discharge electrodes to create a field-free transfer region downstream from the discharge region
f shows multiple R2CISs oriented in a coplanar array;
The invention will be described with reference to the drawing Figures in which
Referring now to
Sample from a source 10 is delivered to a nebulizer 14 by a sample delivery means 12 through an ion source entrance wall 36. This embodiment contains a heated nebulizer for nebulization and evaporation of sample streams emanating from liquid chromatographs and other liquid sample introduction devices. The liquid sample is heated, nebulized, and vaporized by the input of nebulization gas from a nebulization gas source 20 and by heat from heating coils 23 generated by a nebulizer heat source 30. The nebulizer produces a sample aerosol flow 34 with the sample being vaporized into the gas-phase and proceeding into a reaction or sample ionization region 52.
Direct current potentials are applied to the nebulizer heat source 30, electrodes 42, 43, inner-HT electrode 64, outer-HT electrode 66, and to the reagent source wall 37. The sample may be heated as well by passing or directing a heated gas over the sample or by illuminating the sample with infra-red light or a laser, thereby vaporizing the sample and forming gas-phase molecules which migrate into the reaction or sample ionization region 52 where reagent ions interact with the these gas-phase molecules forming gas-phase ions. The sample may be also heated by passing a heated gas over the sample. This heated gas may be the same gas present in the ionization region or added to the reaction region from an auxiliary source. Both the electric potentials and means for heating the sample may be controlled manually by an operator of the device or may be initiated by an operator but the process of ion generation, sample heating, and sampling of gas-phase ions will ordinarily be controlled by a computer.
Under the influences of the applied DC potentials on the elements, walls, and lenses, essentially all of the gas-phase ions in the sample ion-sampling or funnel region 50, including reagent and sample ions, take on a series of sample ion trajectories 56, move through equipotential lines 54, and are focused through the funnel aperture 58 in the funnel aperture wall 78, into a deep-well region 70 through an exit aperture 76 in the deep-well lens 72 into the sample ion collection region 80. The deep-well lens 72 is isolated from the funnel aperture wall 78 by an insulator ring 74.
Exit aperture 76 has a diameter that is sized to restrict the flow of gas into the sample ion collection region 80. In the case of vacuum detection, such as mass spectrometry in the sample ion collection region 80, typical aperture diameters are 100 to 1000 micrometers. The sample ion collection region 80 in this embodiment is intended to be the vacuum system of a mass spectrometer (interface stages, optics, analyzer, detector) or other low-pressure, intermediate pressure or atmospheric pressure ion and particle detectors. Excess sample and reagent gases in the sample ion-sampling or funnel region 50 are exhausted through an exhaust outlet 60 and delivered to an exhaust destination 62. Pressure regulation can also be provided between exhaust outlet 60 and exhaust destination 62.
The circuit diagram of
The use of a resistor or resistors connected at one end to ground and at the other to the power supply and gas discharge anode, and of a resister or resistors connected at one end to ground and at the other to the power supply and gas discharge cathode, enables the production of positive, negative or both positive and negative ions (
The ratio of R1 to R2 determines the ion output. Current and power are varied by connecting resistors directly between the power supply anode and the gas discharge anode and/or between the power supply cathode and the gas discharge cathode. These resistors (
By altering the values of resistors R1 to R4, a wide variety of currents and powers across the gas discharge device are obtained under conditions where both elements of the gas discharge device are positive or negative, or one element is positive and the other is negative.
As shown in
By introducing resistors R1A and R2A, as shown in
a to 10f are cross-sectional illustrations of a number of alternative configurations of the R2CIS ion sources for field-free transfer of ions.
b shows an axial needle electrode and a disk-shaped counter-electrode with a disk-shaped field-shielding element 47 downstream with a circular opening held at a potential between the needle and counter electrodes to create a field-free transfer region downstream from the discharge region. Additionally, high velocity gas introduced through concentric gas flow path 45 in the direction of the arrows facilitates the transfer of reactant species from the discharge plasma through the aperture in the field-shielding element 47. The concentric gas flow path 45 may comprise of a single concentric opening or a series of discrete tubes oriented radially around the axis of the needle electrode in order to maximize the linear velocity through the annulus while reducing the gas flow requirements. This produces the same linear velocity, but at a lower flow. Alternative path configurations are also possible to match the flow pathway with transfer element and electrode geometries.
c shows an axial hollow needle first electrode 42 and a disk-shaped second electrode 43 with a disk-shaped field-shielding element 47 downstream with a circular opening held at a potential between the needle and counter electrodes to create a field-free transfer region 40 downstream from the discharge region. Reagent gases or liquids can be introduced through the tube and additional reagent or transfer gases can be added concentrically. An important operational advantage of this configuration is the addition of liquid into the needle. This allows the operation in electrospray mode, pneumatically assisted electrospray mode, or other variations of liquid introduction such as simple spraying or corona assisted electrospray. In the configuration where liquid is introduced, liquid can be derived from a variety of liquid sources, including solvent pumps, liquid chromatographs, flow streams, capillary electrophoresis and related techniques, natural liquid sources, process streams, and other liquid flow sources. The liquid source 49 can provide chemical species that contribute to the production of reagent species in the reagent ion source region 44 or they can be sample components to be analyzed downstream. Alternatively, region 44 can serve as a sample ion source. For the liquid introduction from liquid sample streams the R2CIS is also serving as a sample reaction region. In essence, regions 44 and 52 are combined. Gaseous sample introduction at or near the dregion 44 results in sample product ions being delivered through the field-shielding element into the field-free transfer region as is shown in
d shows two off-axis discharge electrodes 42, 43 with a disk-shaped field-shielding element 47 downstream held at a potential between the two discharge electrodes to create a field-free transfer region downstream from the discharge region. Reagent and transfer gases, or combinations thereof, and liquids can be introduced through an insulating tube 38 on axis with the field-shielding element.
e shows two off-axis discharge electrodes 42, 43 positioned outside of an insulated transfer tube with a disk-shaped field-shielding element 47 downstream held at a potential between the two discharge electrodes to create a field-free transfer region downstream from the discharge region. Reagent and transfer gases, or combinations thereof, and/or liquids can be introduced through the insulated tube on axis with the field-shielding element. This configuration allows the discharge to be contained within the insulating tube 38, allowing reagent gas to be in a more controlled plasma, not being exposed directly to the electrode surfaces.
f shows a plurality of R2CIS sources oriented in a coplanar array. While four sources are illustrated, a lesser or greater number of R2CIS sources may be employed. Such arrays are geometric combinations of reagent sources that can be patterned to optimize transmission of ions through any number of field-free region geometries to deliver the reagent cross-section to the reaction region or through a differential mobility spectrometer (DMS) 87 (
Multiple R2CIS sources oriented around a single sample reaction region constitute another preferred embodiment of our invention, and that embodiment is illustrated in
Another embodiment of this invention is shown in
An alternative approach to the use of this invention is illustrated in
Other reagent gases from reagent gas source 48b may also be added to reaction or sample ionization region 52 to produce labeled, tagged, or selectively reacted sample related product ions. In general, all of the various embodiments of this invention operate in the same fashion, and all utilize a plasma or gas discharge to create energetic species. A gas or mixture of gases is passed through the plasma or discharge, producing ions and energetic species such as positive and negative ions, excited state neutral species, metastable neutral species, excited state ions, electrons, radicals, proton donors, proton acceptors, electron donors, electron acceptors, adduct donors, adduct acceptors, and other primary and secondary products of discharge processes. Control of the species and amounts of species leaving the discharge region is achieved electronically by using the circuitry shown in
Once through the barrier, the energetic species encounter a region through which is passed a gas or mixture of gases that react with the said ions, energetic species, or combination thereof, producing charged gas-phase ions such as protonated species, electron attached species, deprotonated species, electron detached species, adducted species, including reagent ions such as O2− and (H2O)nH+. These reagent ions can be moved by aerodynamic means, by electronic means, and by a combination of both means. The ions can be focused or accelerated by such means. These reagent ions can be moved to contact and interact with samples, which can contain one substance or comprise a mixture of several substances. Further, the samples can be neutral gas-phase sample species such as eluents from gas chromatograms, eluents from sprayers emitted from liquid chromatographs, neutral species evaporated from sample surfaces at or near the sample reaction region, neutral species on sample surfaces at or near the sample reaction region, sample streams carried from sample locations by carrier gases that are located remotely from reaction region, and process gas, liquid or solid streams (
The interaction of the reactant ions with sample can produce, among others, protonated species, electron attached species, deprotonated species, electron detached species, adducted species, sample charged fragment species, reaction products of labeled or tagged species, reaction products of polymerization reactions, multicharged species, and radical species, in addition to ions from the sample materials.
The sample-derived ions can be used to determine the presence or absence of sample materials. Sample material ions can be detected or collected using gas-phase ion detectors such as mass spectrometry, ion mobility spectrometry, and differential mobility spectrometry, fluorescence, luminescence, and spectroscopy or spectrometry of any kind alone or in combination. Further, any method that can detect sample ions derived directly from the sample can be used to detect and identify the sample immediately.
A gas with a low breakdown potential can be used in the gas discharge device to produce energetic species that will ionize atoms or molecules outside of the discharge region. For example, energetic helium species obtained in the gas discharge can be used to ionize molecules in air or other gases or mixture of gases outside the discharge region. The ions so produced, are termed reagent ions, and include, for example, O2− and (H2O)nH+. Those ions are sufficiently energetic and reactive to ionize many samples, analytes, or chemicals of military and commercial interest to produce sample ions for subsequent detection. In this case, there is an energy flow that begins with the production of various species of ionized and metastable gas atoms or molecules in the discharge. These species then can transfer energy to different reagent ions, that in turn cause ionization of sample chemicals. The sample chemicals can be introduced into a device containing the R2CIS. Alternatively, by projecting the stream of reagent ions in space, chemicals in vapor, liquid and solid phases can be ionized and subsequently captured, detected and identified.
A gas discharge produces reagent ions that can subsequently and directly ionize a wide variety of chemicals in vapor, liquid or solid form. Of particular interest is the direct ionization of solid explosives including EGDN, DNT, TNT, Tetryl, RDX and HMX. These explosives have having vapor pressures varying over seven orders of magnitude. In these cases, the ionization process does not result in extensive fragmentation of the molecules. Instead, this soft ionization process produces only a few ion types from each molecule, thereby maximizing the sensitivity obtained upon subsequent detection and identification of the ions.
Controlling the gas discharge and the ions subsequently produced is important in controlling the operation of and expanding the capabilities of this ionization system. Important parameters for controlling the energy in a gas discharge are the geometry between the two elements of the discharge device, the shape and materials of the elements and the voltage and current applied to the device to produce a gas discharge between the elements. Through variations of these parameters and others, pulsed and continuous discharges can be been produced, as can glow discharges, coronas, and arcing. Depending upon gas discharge conditions, different ions and metastable species can be produced, either as products in their own right or as energetic species that can subsequently produce other ions as end products. Controlling this latter process using simple means is important because the discharge device can serve as a simple, inexpensive, field-free source of positive or negative ions or of positive and negative ions simultaneously, depending upon the operating conditions selected.
The description of the invention that is set out above should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. Other variations and modifications will be apparent to one skilled in this art as, for example the sample can be introduced off-axis or orthogonal to the funnel region; gases and gas mixtures such as helium and nitrogen and reactive gases can be added to the ionization region to form specified reagent ions; the laminated high-transmission element can have other shapes, such as spherical, conical shaped, or other geometries; the number of laminates of the laminated high-transmission elements can vary depending on the source of ions, the type of ion-collection region or a combination of both; the device may be self-contained including an ion source, power supplies, computer, gases, and ion analyzer and may be small enough to be placed on a small table or workbench or mounted on wall in a building or the device may be packaged as a probe that includes an ion source, power connections, inlets for gases and the like designed to be added to existing mass spectrometers and ion mobility analyzers, and similar analytical devices.
Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims rather than be limited to the exemplary embodiments presented.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/724,399 that was filed on Oct. 7, 2005. This patent also relates to the following commonly owned patents and patent applications: U.S. Pat. No. 6,888,132, granted May 3, 2005 and continuation Ser. No. 11/120,363, filed May 2, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,095,019. This application is also related to application Ser. No. 08/946,290, filed Oct. 7, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,147,345, granted Nov. 14, 2000; application Ser. No. 09/877,167, filed Jun. 8, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,744,041, granted Jun. 1, 2004; application Ser. No. 10/449,147, filed May 31, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,889, granted Nov. 16, 2004; application Ser. No. 10/785,441, filed Feb. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,878,930, granted Apr. 12, 2005; application Ser. No. 10/661,842, filed Sep. 12, 2003, application Ser. No. 10/688,021, filed Oct. 17, 2003, application Ser. No. 10/863,130, filed Jun. 7, 2004, now patent application publication No. 2004/0245458, published Dec. 9, 2004; application Ser. No. 10/862,304, filed Jun. 7, 2004, now patent application publication No. 2005/0056776, published Mar. 27, 2005 and application Ser. No. 11/122,459, notice of allowance: Jul. 14, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4000918 | Reker | Jan 1977 | A |
4159423 | Kambara | Jun 1979 | A |
4209696 | Fite | Jun 1980 | A |
4271357 | Bradshaw et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4300004 | Wissner et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4318028 | Perel et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4468468 | Benninghoven et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4531056 | Labowsky et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4542293 | Fenn et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4546253 | Tsuchiya et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4789783 | Cook | Dec 1988 | A |
4855595 | Blanchard | Aug 1989 | A |
4948962 | Mitsui et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4974648 | Propst | Dec 1990 | A |
4976920 | Jacob | Dec 1990 | A |
4977320 | Chowdhury et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4999492 | Nakagawa | Mar 1991 | A |
5141532 | Sacks et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142143 | Fite et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5164704 | Steen et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168068 | Yanagisawa et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171525 | Jacob | Dec 1992 | A |
5192865 | Zhu | Mar 1993 | A |
5280175 | Karl | Jan 1994 | A |
5304797 | Irie et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305015 | Schantz et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306910 | Jarrell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5338931 | Spangler et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5412208 | Covey et al. | May 1995 | A |
5412209 | Otaka et al. | May 1995 | A |
5436446 | Jarrell et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5485016 | Irie et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5541519 | Stearns et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5559326 | Goodley et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581081 | Kato et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587581 | Stroosnyder | Dec 1996 | A |
5625184 | Vestal et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5684300 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5736740 | Franzen | Apr 1998 | A |
5747799 | Franzen | May 1998 | A |
5750988 | Apffel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753910 | Gourley et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756994 | Bajic | May 1998 | A |
5798146 | Murokh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5828062 | Jarrell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838002 | Sheehan | Nov 1998 | A |
5873523 | Gomez et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5892364 | Monagle | Apr 1999 | A |
5945678 | Yanagisawa | Aug 1999 | A |
5965884 | Laiko et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986259 | Hirabayashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6040575 | Whitehouse et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6060705 | Whitehouse et al. | May 2000 | A |
6107628 | Smith et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124675 | Bertrand et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6147345 | Willoughby | Nov 2000 | A |
6204500 | Whitehouse et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207954 | Andrien, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223584 | Mustacich et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6225623 | Turner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239428 | Kunz | May 2001 | B1 |
6278111 | Sheehan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6359275 | Bertsch et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6455846 | Prior et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462338 | Inatsugu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465776 | Moini et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486469 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495823 | Miller et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512224 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534765 | Robb et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537817 | Papen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6583407 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583408 | Smith et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6600155 | Andrien, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610986 | Hartley | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6649907 | Ebeling et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6683301 | Whitehouse et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690004 | Miller et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6727496 | Miller et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6744041 | Sheehan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750449 | Marcus | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6784424 | Willoughby et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6815668 | Miller et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818889 | Sheehan et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822225 | Xu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852969 | Marcus et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852970 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867415 | Hughey et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878930 | Willoughby et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888132 | Sheehan et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6914243 | Sheehan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943347 | Willoughby et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949740 | Sheehan et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949741 | Cody et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6972407 | Miller et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6998605 | Frazer et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7005634 | Shiokawa et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7041966 | Frazer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053367 | Tobita et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060976 | Sheehan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064320 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078068 | Book | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083112 | Ivri | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087898 | Willoughby et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091493 | Hiraoka | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095019 | Sheehan et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7112785 | Laramee et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112786 | Russ, IV et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138626 | Karpetsky | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7253406 | Sheehan et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7259368 | Frazer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274015 | Miller et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7429731 | Karpetsky | Sep 2008 | B1 |
20020011560 | Sheehan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020175278 | Whitehouse | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020185593 | Doring | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020185595 | Smith et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030034452 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038236 | Russ, IV et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030197121 | Turecek et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040161856 | Handly | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040245458 | Sheehan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050056775 | Cody et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050196871 | Cody et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060249671 | Karpetsky | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070084999 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114389 | Karpetsky et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080296493 | Willoughby et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2127212 | Apr 1984 | GB |
2288061 | Oct 1995 | GB |
04215329 | Aug 1992 | JP |
05203637 | Aug 1993 | JP |
10088798 | Apr 1998 | JP |
WO 9314515 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9807505 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9963576 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0008455 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0008456 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0008457 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0133604 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0133605 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 03010794 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 04098743 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 04110583 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 06011171 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 06122121 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 08054393 | May 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60724399 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11120363 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 11544252 | US |