Resistive glass structures used to shape electric fields in analytical instruments

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8084732
  • Patent Number
    8,084,732
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 22, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 27, 2011
    12 years ago
Abstract
A reflectron lens for a time-of-flight mass spectrometer and a method of making same are disclosed. The reflectron lens includes a glass tube having a conductive surface along the length of the tube. The conductive surface has an electrical resistance gradient along its length. The electrical resistance gradient provides an electric field interior to the tube that varies in strength along the length of the tube when an electric potential is applied to opposing ends of the tube. A mass spectrometer incorporating the reflectron lens, a method of making the reflectron lens, and an apparatus for removing lead from the surface of a lead silicate glass tube are also disclosed.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to mass spectrometers, and in particular to a reflectron type time-of-flight mass spectrometer and to a glass reflectron lens for such a spectrometer wherein the lens has a gradient electrical resistance on its surface.


Mass spectrometers are analytical instruments capable of identifying unknown materials in complex mixtures with precision in the parts per billion range. Once used exclusively in research laboratories, mass spectrometers are now in use in a broad range of applications. They are used in screening for pesticides in canned foods, controlling semiconductor manufacturing processes, diagnosing disease, exploring for natural resources, discovering new pharmaceuticals, predicting volcano eruptions, and security systems. Indeed, these instruments have traveled beyond our world aboard the Galileo and Cassini spacecrafts to provide atmospheric analysis of neighboring worlds within our solar system.


Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (TOF-MS) is rapidly becoming the most popular method of mass separation in analytical chemistry. The development of low cost digitizers and extremely fast ion detectors has fueled this popularity. TOF-MS is easily deployed and can produce very high mass resolution. This technique of mass separation can be adapted for many forms of sample introduction and ionization. Unlike quadrupoles and ion traps, time of flight mass analyzers perform well with very high mass molecules of the type frequently found in protean applications. Wiley and McLaren in 1955, followed by Cotter in 1992, and Wollnik in 1993 have described time of flight mass analyzers.


Time-of-flight mass spectrometers are produced in two main types: linear instruments and reflectron instruments.


Linear Time of Flight Mass Spectrometers



FIG. 1 illustrates a linear time of flight mass spectrometer embodied as a matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) instrument 100. In a linear time of flight mass spectrometer, an unknown sample is first converted to ions. The sample is deposited on a plate 102. A light beam from a laser 104 is directed at the sample on plate 102 which causes the sample to ionize. The resultant ions are injected into a flight tube 106 wherein they travel towards the ion detector 108. The detector may be embodied as a microchannel-plate type detector as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,828,729, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.


The motion of the ions within the flight tube can be described by the following equation.

t2=m/z(d2/2Vse)

In Equation 1, m/z is the mass to charge ratio of the ion, d is the distance to the detector, and Vse is the acceleration potential.


The lighter ions (i.e. ions having relatively lower masses) travel toward the detector 108 faster than the higher mass ions. If the flight tube is long enough, the ions will arrive at the detector according to their mass, i.e., lowest to highest.


When the ions arrive at the detector 108, they initiate a cascade of secondary electrons within the detector, which results in the generation of a series of very fast voltage pulses. The voltage pulses precisely signal the arrival of the ions. A high-speed oscilloscope or transient recorder is used to record the arrival times. FIG. 2 illustrates the arrival time spectrum of a sample of Brandykinin analyzed on a linear time of flight mass spectrometer. Knowing the exact arrival times, Equation 1 can be used to solve for the mass-to-charge ratios of the ions.


Reflectron-Type Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer


The second type of time-of-flight mass spectrometer is the reflectron instrument. FIG. 3 illustrates a known arrangement of a reflectron TOF mass spectrometer 300. The reflectron design takes advantage of the fact that the further the ions are allowed to travel, the greater the distance between ions of slightly differing masses. Greater distances between ions with different masses will increase the arrival time differences between the ions and thereby increase the resolution at which ions having similar mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) can be differentiated. In addition, the reflectron design corrects for the energy dispersion of the ions leaving the source.


In the reflectron analyzer 300, the ions are injected into the flight tube 302 in the same manner as in a linear instrument described above. The ions travel down the flight tube and enter the reflectron lens 304. FIG. 4 shows the construction of a known reflectron lens. It consists of a plurality of stacked metal rings that are spaced and insulated from each other. An electrostatic field is created within the reflectron lens 304 by applying different high voltage potentials to each of the metal rings. The electrostatic field has a polarity that causes the ions to decelerate and eventually reverse their direction. The ions exit the lens 304 and are directed to the ion detector 306. The action of the reflectron lens on the ions effectively doubles their length of travel in the flight tube. The additional travel time improves mass resolution without adding additional length to the flight tube.


Most time of flight instruments manufactured today incorporate reflectron lenses. As shown in FIG. 4 a reflectron lens consists of a stack of precision ground metal rings 402 alternating with insulating spacers 404. The rings and spacers are held together with threaded rods 406. The reflectron lens assembly may have hundreds of components which must be carefully assembled and aligned (typically by hand) in a clean, dust free environment. Additionally, a voltage divider must be included in each row or layer in order to produce the electrostatic field gradient necessary to reverse the direction of the ions.


An improved variant of the classical reflectron lens design utilizes a single resistive glass tube to generate the gradient electric field. A resistive glass tube reflectron lens is shown in FIG. 5. The monolithic structure of the resistive glass tube replaces the multi-component assembly of the metal ring type of reflectron lens.


Reflectron lenses fabricated from resistive glass tubes have thus far been produced with a uniform resistance along the inside of the tube. That architecture is useful for many reflectron geometries. However, a significant performance advantage and greater design flexibility could be realized if the electrical resistance varied discretely or continuously along the length of the lens.


Resistive glass reflectron lenses are fabricated from lead silicate glass that has been subjected to a hydrogen reduction process to produce a thin resistive layer on the inside surface of the tube. A resistive glass reflectron lens is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,086, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.


The hydrogen reduction process consists of loading the glass tube into a closed furnace through which pure hydrogen or a controlled mixture of hydrogen and oxygen is purged. The temperature is gradually increased, typically at a rate of 1-3 degrees per minute. Beginning at approximately 250° C., a chemical reaction occurs in the glass in which the lead oxide in the glass converts to a semi-conductive state. This reaction occurs in the first few hundred angstroms of the cross section of the glass. As the glass continues to be heated in the presence of the hydrogen, more of the lead oxide is chemically reduced, thereby providing lower electrical resistance. Temperature, time, gas pressure, and gas flow can be controlled to provide a desired amount of electrical resistance on the surface of the glass.


The electrical resistance is also dependent on the composition of the glass. For example, a glass containing more lead oxide with a modifier such as bismuth can be used to produce lower resistances. The hydrogen reduction process makes all surfaces of the glass tube conductive. Unwanted conductive surfaces can be stripped by chemical or mechanical means.


A known hydrogen reduction process has the following parameters:


3 hour ramp up from RT to 200° C.;


1 hour ramp up from 200 to 300° C.;


12.5 hour ramp up from 300 to 445° C.;


hold at 445° C. for 3 hours in hydrogen at a pressure of 34 psi and a hydrogen flow of 40 l/m.


The reduction temperature is limited on the low end by the minimum temperature needed to sustain the reaction and is limited on the high side by the sag point of the glass.


In some applications, it is desirable to produce a segmented resistive tube in which certain sections of the tube have significantly different values of electrical resistance. In other applications it is desirable to have a continuous resistance gradient in which the resistance along the wall varies continuously along the length of the tube. The variation may be linear or nonlinear. For example, an orthogonal geometry time of flight mass spectrometer utilizes a reflectron tube having a nonlinear resistance characteristic. U.S. Pat. No. 7,081,618, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,086 describe methods to produce a uniform electrical resistance in a lead silicate glass tube by subjecting the tube to a reducing environment within a hydrogen furnace.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a reflectron lens for a time-of-flight mass spectrometer that includes a glass tube having a conductive surface along the length of the tube. The conductive surface has an electrical resistance gradient along its length. The electrical resistance gradient provides an electric field interior to the tube that varies in strength along the length of the tube when an electric potential is applied to opposing ends of the tube.


In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a time-of-flight mass spectrometer that has a reflectron lens. The reflectron lens is formed of a glass tube having a conductive surface along the length of the tube. The conductive surface has an electrical resistance gradient along its length. The time-of-flight mass spectrometer according to this invention also includes a voltage supply electrically connected to opposite ends of the tube. With the foregoing arrangement, the reflectron lens provides an electric field interior thereto that varies in strength along the length of the lens.


In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of preparing a glass tube for use as a reflectron lens. The process includes the steps of providing a glass tube wherein the glass contains a lead compound and immersing a portion of the glass tube in an acidic solution. The portion of the glass tube is held in the acidic solution for a time sufficient to remove lead from the surface of the immersed portion of said glass tube. The surface of the glass tube is then chemically reduced to form an electrically resistive layer on the surface of the glass tube. In this manner, the electrical resistance of the portion held in the acidic solution will be lower than the electrical resistance of another portion of the glass tube.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing description of the background of the invention, as well as the following description of preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood by reference to the drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a linear time-of-flight mass spectrometer;



FIG. 2 is a graph of the response of a linear time-of-flight mass spectrometer for a sample of Brandykinin;



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a reflectron type mass spectrometer;



FIG. 4 is a photograph of a metal-ring reflectron lens;



FIG. 5 is a photograph of a glass reflectron lens;



FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for carrying out selective leaching of lead from a lead silicate glass tube in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing the step of selective immersion of a glass tube in a lead leaching solution;



FIG. 8 is a graph of the electrical resistance per unit area of a glass tube prepared in accordance with the present invention wherein the electrical resistance varies in steps;



FIG. 9 is a graph of the electrical resistance per unit area of a glass tube prepared in accordance with the present invention wherein the electrical resistance varies linearly;



FIG. 10 is a graph of the electrical resistance per unit area of a glass tube prepared in accordance with the present invention wherein the electrical resistance varies nonlinearly; and



FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a reflectron type mass spectrometer utilizing a glass reflectron lens made in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The lead oxide within lead silicate bulk glass is reacted with hydrogen at temperatures ranging from 350-550° C. The chemical reaction occurs on the surface of the work piece, not in the interior of the bulk material. The chemical reaction proceeds as follows:

Pb2O5+H2→Pb2Ox+H2O

The reaction yields a semi-conductive form of lead oxide that is uniformly distributed over all surfaces of the work piece. The electrical resistance along the surface is a function of the process parameters of temperature, time, the pressure and composition of the hydrogen/oxygen cover gas, and the composition of the lead silicate glass at the reduction surface.


In order to obtain an electrical resistance that varies along the length of the work piece, it is necessary to either vary the process parameters locally along the piece or change the base material in some way. The hydrogen reduction process is performed in large furnaces with significant gas flows in order to prevent local process variations. The bulk glass material is fabricated in very large batch melts that weigh up to thousands of pounds. Manufacturers strive for uniformity within the melt, thereby making it nearly impossible to produce chemical differences over small distances in the work piece.


One method to change the composition of the glass structure over small distances would be to preferentially remove lead from the surface of the substrate. Preferentially removing lead from the immediate surface in the desired locations would cause those areas to have higher resistances because less lead would be reduced to the semi-conducting form of the lead oxide during the hydrogen reduction process.


Lead can be preferentially removed from the surface of a lead silicate glass in a leaching process by exposing the workpiece to certain acidic solutions. Either hydrochloric or nitric acid, in a concentration of 10%, has been used to preferentially remove lead in desired areas of a resistive glass work piece. Removing the lead from the surface will increase the electrical resistance in the area(s) exposed to the leaching process. Conversely, preventing exposure to the leachant in specific areas will ensure lower resistances in those areas. Experiments have been performed which indicate that the resistance obtained after the reduction process is inversely proportional to the exposure time to the leachant for a given concentration and temperature of the solution.


In order to control the exposure of the work piece to the leaching solution, it is preferred to have an apparatus for performing the process in a controllable manner. FIG. 6 illustrates such a device. The preferred machine 600 includes an acid tank 602 which holds the acidic solution used for leaching. The work piece 604 is held by a chuck 606 that is attached to a slide mechanism 608. The slide 608 is moved by rotation of a lead screw (not shown). An L-shaped support fixture 610 is attached to the slide 608. The chuck 606 is supported from the fixture 610 with a gimbal 612. The slide mechanism 608 is supported by a mounting bracket 614 that is mounted on a table 616 or other support stand. A shield 618 is provided to protect the slide mechanism 608.


The slide mechanism 608 is connected to a DC stepper motor 620 that is mounted to the table 616. The stepper motor 620 has a drive shaft to which a drive pulley 624 is attached. A second drive pulley 628 mounted on a drive shaft 630 that is connected to the lead screw in the slide mechanism 608. A timing belt 626 connects the first drive pulley 624 to the second drive pulley 628 such that rotation of the stepper motor shaft results in rotation of the drive shaft 630. The drive shaft 630 is coupled to the lead screw with a flexible connector 634 to complete the linkage between the stepper motor 620 and the lead screw. With the arrangement shown in FIG. 6, the glass tube work piece 604 can be precisely moved into and out of the acid tank 602 to permit selective leaching of the lead from the glass.


As shown in FIG. 7, a step-wise resistance gradient is produced by stopping the immersion of the glass tube at a predetermined location along the length of the tube. The tube is held for a time sufficient to achieve a predefined amount of leaching. In this embodiment, the resistance of the portion of the tube immersed in the solution is significantly higher than the portion not exposed to the solution. FIG. 8 illustrates the stepped resistance profile along the length of the glass tube. Please note the y-scale is resistance per unit area, not total end-to-point resistance along the wall of the tube.


In another embodiment of the process, the apparatus shown in FIG. 6 can be used to slowly lower the work piece into the acid solution at a controlled rate of speed. Lowering the piece at a fixed rate creates a linear resistance profile as illustrated in FIG. 9.


In other embodiments of the process, the apparatus shown in FIG. 6 is modulated to perform a process in which a combination of the steps described above is performed. For example, a first portion of the glass tube is exposed for a first time period, while a different section is moved continuously as it is exposed, and a third section is not exposed at all. FIG. 10 illustrates the nonlinear resistance profile produced by such a process. In this manner, an unlimited number of resistance profiles can be produced.


Glass tubes having low resistances in the middle portion of the tube length can be produced either by masking the work piece in the area of desired low resistance or flipping the work piece in the holder. Masking materials can be applied by brushing, spraying, taping, or they can be spun on.


A glass tube made in accordance with the present invention can be used a reflectron lens in a reflectron type mass spectrometer. Such an arrangement is shown in FIG. 11. An ion mass spectrometer 1100 according to the present invention has a flight tube 1102 through which the ions travel. The mass spectrometer 1100 includes a reflectron lens 1104 that is formed from a glass tube having a gradient electrical resistance along the length of its surface. The reflectron lens 1104 is disposed at an end of the flight tube 1102 distal from an ion detector 1108. Preferably, the ion detector 1108 is a microchannel plate-based ion detector. A linear detector may be provided at the reflectron lens end of the flight tube 1102. An ionization section 1110 is provided at the same end of the flight tube 1102 as the ion detector 1108, although spaced therefrom. The ionization section 1110 provides ionized sample material into the flight tube 1102.


It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that changes or modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing from the broad inventive concepts of the invention. It is understood, therefore, that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments which are described, but is intended to cover all modifications and changes within the scope and spirit of the invention as described above and set forth in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A reflectron lens comprising a lead silicate glass tube having a lead oxide semiconductive surface layer formed along the length of said glass tube, said lead oxide semiconductive surface layer having an electrical resistance gradient along said length, whereby said tube provides an electric field interior to the tube that varies in strength along the length of the tube when an electric potential is applied to opposing ends of the tube.
  • 2. The reflectron lens set forth in claim 1 wherein the semiconductive surface layer is formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes linearly along the length of the tube.
  • 3. The reflectron lens set forth in claim 1 wherein the semiconductive surface layer is formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes in steps along the length of the tube.
  • 4. The reflectron lens set forth in claim 1 wherein the semiconductive surface layer is formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes nonlinearly along the length of the tube.
  • 5. A mass spectrometer comprising: a flight tube;a source of ions positioned at a first end of said flight tube;an ion detector positioned at the first end of said flight tube and in spaced relation to said source of ions;a reflectron lens positioned in said flight tube at a second end thereof that is distal from said ion detector; anda voltage supply electrically connected to opposing ends of said reflectron lens;wherein said reflectron lens comprises a lead silicate glass tube having a lead oxide semiconductive surface layer extending along the length of the glass tube and said lead oxide semiconductive surface layer has an electrical resistance gradient along said length, whereby said reflectron lens provides an electric field interior thereto that varies in strength along the length of said lens.
  • 6. The mass spectrometer set forth in claim 5 wherein the semiconductive surface layer is formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes linearly along the length of the glass tube.
  • 7. The mass spectrometer set forth in claim 5 wherein the semiconductive surface layer is formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes in steps along the length of the glass tube.
  • 8. The mass spectrometer set forth in claim 5 wherein the semiconductive surface layer is formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes nonlinearly along the length of the glass tube.
  • 9. A reflectron lens comprising a lead silicate glass tube having a semiconductive surface layer along the length of the surface of said tube, said semiconductive surface layer comprising a plurality of lead oxide semiconducting areas formed in the surface of the glass that provide an electrical resistance gradient along said length, whereby said tube provides an electric field interior to the tube that varies in strength along the length of the tube when an electric potential is applied to opposing ends of the tube.
  • 10. The reflectron lens set forth in claim 9 wherein the plurality of lead oxide semiconducting areas are formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes linearly along the length of the tube.
  • 11. The reflectron lens set forth in claim 9 wherein the plurality of lead oxide semiconducting areas are formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes in steps along the length of the tube.
  • 12. The reflectron lens set forth in claim 9 wherein the plurality of lead oxide semiconducting areas are formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes nonlinearly along the length of the tube.
  • 13. A mass spectrometer comprising: a flight tube;a source of ions positioned at a first end of said flight tube;an ion detector positioned at the first end of said flight tube and in spaced relation to said source of ions;a reflectron lens positioned in said flight tube at a second end thereof that is distal from said ion detector; anda voltage supply electrically connected to opposing ends of said reflectron lens;wherein said reflectron lens comprises a lead silicate glass tube having a semiconductive surface layer extending along the length of the glass tube and said semiconductive surface layer comprises a plurality of lead oxide semiconducting areas formed in the surface of the glass that provide an electrical resistance gradient along said length, whereby said reflectron lens provides an electric field interior thereto that varies in strength along the length of said lens.
  • 14. The mass spectrometer set forth in claim 13 wherein the plurality of lead oxide semiconducting areas are formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes linearly along the length of the glass tube.
  • 15. The mass spectrometer set forth in claim 13 wherein the plurality of lead oxide semiconducting areas are formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes in steps along the length of the glass tube.
  • 16. The mass spectrometer set forth in claim 13 wherein the plurality of lead oxide semiconducting areas are formed such that the electrical resistance gradient changes nonlinearly along the length of the glass tube.
  • 17. A method of preparing a glass tube for use as a reflectron lens comprising the steps of: providing a glass tube wherein the glass contains a lead compound;immersing a portion of said glass tube in a solution that removes lead from the surface of the glass tube;holding said portion of the glass tube in the solution for a time sufficient to remove lead from the surface of the immersed portion of said glass tube; and thenchemically reducing the surface of the glass tube to form an electrically resistive layer on the surface of the glass tube, whereby the electrical resistance of the portion held in the acidic solution is lower than the electrical resistance of the other portion of the glass tube;whereby said glass tube has a conductive surface along the length of said tube, said conductive surface having an electrical resistance gradient along said length, and said tube provides an electric field interior to the tube that varies in strength along the length of the tube when an electric potential is applied to opposing ends of the tube.
  • 18. The method set forth in claim 17 wherein the step of providing the glass tube comprises the step of providing a lead silicate glass tube.
  • 19. The method set forth in claim 17 wherein before said chemically reducing step, performing the further steps of immersing a second portion of said glass tube in the lead-removal solution and holding said second portion in the solution for a time sufficient to remove lead from the surface of the immersed second portion of the glass tube.
  • 20. The method set forth in claim 17 wherein the lead removal solution comprises an acidic solution.
  • 21. The method set forth in claim 17 wherein the step of holding the portion of the glass tube in the lead removal solution comprises the step of moving the glass tube into the solution at a speed selected to provide removal of lead in a linear manner along the length of the glass tube.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 11/683,713, filed Mar. 8, 2007 now abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/781,088, filed Mar. 10, 2006, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (77)
Number Name Date Kind
2680826 O'Neill et al. Jun 1954 A
2841729 Wiley Jul 1958 A
2841879 Wiley Jul 1958 A
3197663 Norman et al. Jul 1965 A
3424909 Rougeot Jan 1969 A
3488509 Goodrich Jan 1970 A
3519870 Jensen Jul 1970 A
3634712 Orthuber Jan 1972 A
3673449 Eschard Jun 1972 A
3675063 Spindt et al. Jul 1972 A
3819941 Carrico Jun 1974 A
3885180 Carts, Jr. May 1975 A
3902089 Beasley et al. Aug 1975 A
3911167 Linder Oct 1975 A
3959038 Gutierrez et al. May 1976 A
3976905 Seidman et al. Aug 1976 A
3996474 Lowther Dec 1976 A
4015159 Zipfel, Jr. Mar 1977 A
4051403 Feingold et al. Sep 1977 A
4073989 Wainer Feb 1978 A
4093562 Kishimoto Jun 1978 A
4095136 Niklas Jun 1978 A
4099079 Knapp Jul 1978 A
4126781 Siegel Nov 1978 A
4217489 Rosier Aug 1980 A
4236073 Martin Nov 1980 A
4267442 Rosier May 1981 A
4352985 Martin Oct 1982 A
4390784 Browning et al. Jun 1983 A
4454422 Persyk Jun 1984 A
4468420 Kawahara et al. Aug 1984 A
RE31847 Luckey Mar 1985 E
4558144 Fay et al. Dec 1985 A
4563250 Becker et al. Jan 1986 A
4577133 Wilson Mar 1986 A
4589952 Behringer et al. May 1986 A
4598037 Felten Jul 1986 A
4624736 Gee et al. Nov 1986 A
4624739 Nixon et al. Nov 1986 A
4659429 Isaacson et al. Apr 1987 A
4693781 Leung et al. Sep 1987 A
4698129 Puretz et al. Oct 1987 A
4707218 Giammarco et al. Nov 1987 A
4714861 Tosswill Dec 1987 A
4725332 Spohr Feb 1988 A
4731559 Eschard Mar 1988 A
4734158 Gillis Mar 1988 A
4740267 Knauer et al. Apr 1988 A
4764245 Grewal Aug 1988 A
4780395 Saito et al. Oct 1988 A
4786361 Sekine et al. Nov 1988 A
4790903 Sugano et al. Dec 1988 A
4794296 Warde et al. Dec 1988 A
4800263 Dillon et al. Jan 1989 A
4802951 Clark et al. Feb 1989 A
4806827 Eschard Feb 1989 A
4825118 Kyushima Apr 1989 A
5086248 Horton et al. Feb 1992 A
5109157 Loen Apr 1992 A
5162649 Burke Nov 1992 A
5205902 Horton et al. Apr 1993 A
5351332 Cook Sep 1994 A
5378960 Tasker et al. Jan 1995 A
5726076 Tasker et al. Mar 1998 A
5834771 Yoon et al. Nov 1998 A
6008491 Smentkowski et al. Dec 1999 A
6369383 Cornish et al. Apr 2002 B1
6607414 Cornish et al. Aug 2003 B2
6717135 Hansen Apr 2004 B2
6825474 Young Nov 2004 B2
7141787 Laprade Nov 2006 B2
7154086 Laprade Dec 2006 B2
20030230726 Van der Veer et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040183028 Laprade Sep 2004 A1
20050109930 Hill et al. May 2005 A1
20080073516 Laprade Mar 2008 A1
20080173809 Wu Jul 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
1121858 Apr 1982 CA
0704879 Apr 1996 EP
2180986 Apr 1987 GB
62119121 May 1987 JP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100090098 A1 Apr 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60781088 Mar 2006 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11683713 Mar 2007 US
Child 12644078 US