This invention relates generally to mass spectrometers, and in particular to a reflectron type time-of-flight mass spectrometer and to a glass reflectron lens for such a spectrometer wherein the lens has a gradient electrical resistance on its surface.
Mass spectrometers are analytical instruments capable of identifying unknown materials in complex mixtures with precision in the parts per billion range. Once used exclusively in research laboratories, mass spectrometers are now in use in a broad range of applications. They are used in screening for pesticides in canned foods, controlling semiconductor manufacturing processes, diagnosing disease, exploring for natural resources, discovering new pharmaceuticals, predicting volcano eruptions, and security systems. Indeed, these instruments have traveled beyond our world aboard the Galileo and Cassini spacecrafts to provide atmospheric analysis of neighboring worlds within our solar system.
Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (TOF-MS) is rapidly becoming the most popular method of mass separation in analytical chemistry. The development of low cost digitizers and extremely fast ion detectors has fueled this popularity. TOF-MS is easily deployed and can produce very high mass resolution. This technique of mass separation can be adapted for many forms of sample introduction and ionization. Unlike quadrupoles and ion traps, time of flight mass analyzers perform well with very high mass molecules of the type frequently found in protean applications. Wiley and McLaren in 1955, followed by Cotter in 1992, and Wollnik in 1993 have described time of flight mass analyzers.
Time-of-flight mass spectrometers are produced in two main types: linear instruments and reflectron instruments.
Linear Time of Flight Mass Spectrometers
The motion of the ions within the flight tube can be described by the following equation.
t2=m/z(d2/2Vse)
In Equation 1, m/z is the mass to charge ratio of the ion, d is the distance to the detector, and Vse is the acceleration potential.
The lighter ions (i.e. ions having relatively lower masses) travel toward the detector 108 faster than the higher mass ions. If the flight tube is long enough, the ions will arrive at the detector according to their mass, i.e., lowest to highest.
When the ions arrive at the detector 108, they initiate a cascade of secondary electrons within the detector, which results in the generation of a series of very fast voltage pulses. The voltage pulses precisely signal the arrival of the ions. A high-speed oscilloscope or transient recorder is used to record the arrival times.
Reflectron-Type Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer
The second type of time-of-flight mass spectrometer is the reflectron instrument.
In the reflectron analyzer 300, the ions are injected into the flight tube 302 in the same manner as in a linear instrument described above. The ions travel down the flight tube and enter the reflectron lens 304.
Most time of flight instruments manufactured today incorporate reflectron lenses. As shown in
An improved variant of the classical reflectron lens design utilizes a single resistive glass tube to generate the gradient electric field. A resistive glass tube reflectron lens is shown in
Reflectron lenses fabricated from resistive glass tubes have thus far been produced with a uniform resistance along the inside of the tube. That architecture is useful for many reflectron geometries. However, a significant performance advantage and greater design flexibility could be realized if the electrical resistance varied discretely or continuously along the length of the lens.
Resistive glass reflectron lenses are fabricated from lead silicate glass that has been subjected to a hydrogen reduction process to produce a thin resistive layer on the inside surface of the tube. A resistive glass reflectron lens is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,086, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The hydrogen reduction process consists of loading the glass tube into a closed furnace through which pure hydrogen or a controlled mixture of hydrogen and oxygen is purged. The temperature is gradually increased, typically at a rate of 1-3 degrees per minute. Beginning at approximately 250° C., a chemical reaction occurs in the glass in which the lead oxide in the glass converts to a semi-conductive state. This reaction occurs in the first few hundred angstroms of the cross section of the glass. As the glass continues to be heated in the presence of the hydrogen, more of the lead oxide is chemically reduced, thereby providing lower electrical resistance. Temperature, time, gas pressure, and gas flow can be controlled to provide a desired amount of electrical resistance on the surface of the glass.
The electrical resistance is also dependent on the composition of the glass. For example, a glass containing more lead oxide with a modifier such as bismuth can be used to produce lower resistances. The hydrogen reduction process makes all surfaces of the glass tube conductive. Unwanted conductive surfaces can be stripped by chemical or mechanical means.
A known hydrogen reduction process has the following parameters:
3 hour ramp up from RT to 200° C.;
1 hour ramp up from 200 to 300° C.;
12.5 hour ramp up from 300 to 445° C.;
hold at 445° C. for 3 hours in hydrogen at a pressure of 34 psi and a hydrogen flow of 40 l/m.
The reduction temperature is limited on the low end by the minimum temperature needed to sustain the reaction and is limited on the high side by the sag point of the glass.
In some applications, it is desirable to produce a segmented resistive tube in which certain sections of the tube have significantly different values of electrical resistance. In other applications it is desirable to have a continuous resistance gradient in which the resistance along the wall varies continuously along the length of the tube. The variation may be linear or nonlinear. For example, an orthogonal geometry time of flight mass spectrometer utilizes a reflectron tube having a nonlinear resistance characteristic. U.S. Pat. No. 7,081,618, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,086 describe methods to produce a uniform electrical resistance in a lead silicate glass tube by subjecting the tube to a reducing environment within a hydrogen furnace.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a reflectron lens for a time-of-flight mass spectrometer that includes a glass tube having a conductive surface along the length of the tube. The conductive surface has an electrical resistance gradient along its length. The electrical resistance gradient provides an electric field interior to the tube that varies in strength along the length of the tube when an electric potential is applied to opposing ends of the tube.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a time-of-flight mass spectrometer that has a reflectron lens. The reflectron lens is formed of a glass tube having a conductive surface along the length of the tube. The conductive surface has an electrical resistance gradient along its length. The time-of-flight mass spectrometer according to this invention also includes a voltage supply electrically connected to opposite ends of the tube. With the foregoing arrangement, the reflectron lens provides an electric field interior thereto that varies in strength along the length of the lens.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of preparing a glass tube for use as a reflectron lens. The process includes the steps of providing a glass tube wherein the glass contains a lead compound and immersing a portion of the glass tube in an acidic solution. The portion of the glass tube is held in the acidic solution for a time sufficient to remove lead from the surface of the immersed portion of said glass tube. The surface of the glass tube is then chemically reduced to form an electrically resistive layer on the surface of the glass tube. In this manner, the electrical resistance of the portion held in the acidic solution will be lower than the electrical resistance of another portion of the glass tube.
The foregoing description of the background of the invention, as well as the following description of preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood by reference to the drawings wherein:
The lead oxide within lead silicate bulk glass is reacted with hydrogen at temperatures ranging from 350-550° C. The chemical reaction occurs on the surface of the work piece, not in the interior of the bulk material. The chemical reaction proceeds as follows:
Pb2O5+H2→Pb2Ox+H2O
The reaction yields a semi-conductive form of lead oxide that is uniformly distributed over all surfaces of the work piece. The electrical resistance along the surface is a function of the process parameters of temperature, time, the pressure and composition of the hydrogen/oxygen cover gas, and the composition of the lead silicate glass at the reduction surface.
In order to obtain an electrical resistance that varies along the length of the work piece, it is necessary to either vary the process parameters locally along the piece or change the base material in some way. The hydrogen reduction process is performed in large furnaces with significant gas flows in order to prevent local process variations. The bulk glass material is fabricated in very large batch melts that weigh up to thousands of pounds. Manufacturers strive for uniformity within the melt, thereby making it nearly impossible to produce chemical differences over small distances in the work piece.
One method to change the composition of the glass structure over small distances would be to preferentially remove lead from the surface of the substrate. Preferentially removing lead from the immediate surface in the desired locations would cause those areas to have higher resistances because less lead would be reduced to the semi-conducting form of the lead oxide during the hydrogen reduction process.
Lead can be preferentially removed from the surface of a lead silicate glass in a leaching process by exposing the workpiece to certain acidic solutions. Either hydrochloric or nitric acid, in a concentration of 10%, has been used to preferentially remove lead in desired areas of a resistive glass work piece. Removing the lead from the surface will increase the electrical resistance in the area(s) exposed to the leaching process. Conversely, preventing exposure to the leachant in specific areas will ensure lower resistances in those areas. Experiments have been performed which indicate that the resistance obtained after the reduction process is inversely proportional to the exposure time to the leachant for a given concentration and temperature of the solution.
In order to control the exposure of the work piece to the leaching solution, it is preferred to have an apparatus for performing the process in a controllable manner.
The slide mechanism 608 is connected to a DC stepper motor 620 that is mounted to the table 616. The stepper motor 620 has a drive shaft to which a drive pulley 624 is attached. A second drive pulley 628 mounted on a drive shaft 630 that is connected to the lead screw in the slide mechanism 608. A timing belt 626 connects the first drive pulley 624 to the second drive pulley 628 such that rotation of the stepper motor shaft results in rotation of the drive shaft 630. The drive shaft 630 is coupled to the lead screw with a flexible connector 634 to complete the linkage between the stepper motor 620 and the lead screw. With the arrangement shown in
As shown in
In another embodiment of the process, the apparatus shown in
In other embodiments of the process, the apparatus shown in
Glass tubes having low resistances in the middle portion of the tube length can be produced either by masking the work piece in the area of desired low resistance or flipping the work piece in the holder. Masking materials can be applied by brushing, spraying, taping, or they can be spun on.
A glass tube made in accordance with the present invention can be used a reflectron lens in a reflectron type mass spectrometer. Such an arrangement is shown in
It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that changes or modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing from the broad inventive concepts of the invention. It is understood, therefore, that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments which are described, but is intended to cover all modifications and changes within the scope and spirit of the invention as described above and set forth in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 11/683,713, filed Mar. 8, 2007 now abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/781,088, filed Mar. 10, 2006, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2680826 | O'Neill et al. | Jun 1954 | A |
2841729 | Wiley | Jul 1958 | A |
2841879 | Wiley | Jul 1958 | A |
3197663 | Norman et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
3424909 | Rougeot | Jan 1969 | A |
3488509 | Goodrich | Jan 1970 | A |
3519870 | Jensen | Jul 1970 | A |
3634712 | Orthuber | Jan 1972 | A |
3673449 | Eschard | Jun 1972 | A |
3675063 | Spindt et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3819941 | Carrico | Jun 1974 | A |
3885180 | Carts, Jr. | May 1975 | A |
3902089 | Beasley et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3911167 | Linder | Oct 1975 | A |
3959038 | Gutierrez et al. | May 1976 | A |
3976905 | Seidman et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3996474 | Lowther | Dec 1976 | A |
4015159 | Zipfel, Jr. | Mar 1977 | A |
4051403 | Feingold et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4073989 | Wainer | Feb 1978 | A |
4093562 | Kishimoto | Jun 1978 | A |
4095136 | Niklas | Jun 1978 | A |
4099079 | Knapp | Jul 1978 | A |
4126781 | Siegel | Nov 1978 | A |
4217489 | Rosier | Aug 1980 | A |
4236073 | Martin | Nov 1980 | A |
4267442 | Rosier | May 1981 | A |
4352985 | Martin | Oct 1982 | A |
4390784 | Browning et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4454422 | Persyk | Jun 1984 | A |
4468420 | Kawahara et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
RE31847 | Luckey | Mar 1985 | E |
4558144 | Fay et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4563250 | Becker et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4577133 | Wilson | Mar 1986 | A |
4589952 | Behringer et al. | May 1986 | A |
4598037 | Felten | Jul 1986 | A |
4624736 | Gee et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4624739 | Nixon et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4659429 | Isaacson et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4693781 | Leung et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4698129 | Puretz et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4707218 | Giammarco et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4714861 | Tosswill | Dec 1987 | A |
4725332 | Spohr | Feb 1988 | A |
4731559 | Eschard | Mar 1988 | A |
4734158 | Gillis | Mar 1988 | A |
4740267 | Knauer et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4764245 | Grewal | Aug 1988 | A |
4780395 | Saito et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4786361 | Sekine et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4790903 | Sugano et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794296 | Warde et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800263 | Dillon et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802951 | Clark et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4806827 | Eschard | Feb 1989 | A |
4825118 | Kyushima | Apr 1989 | A |
5086248 | Horton et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5109157 | Loen | Apr 1992 | A |
5162649 | Burke | Nov 1992 | A |
5205902 | Horton et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5351332 | Cook | Sep 1994 | A |
5378960 | Tasker et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5726076 | Tasker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5834771 | Yoon et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6008491 | Smentkowski et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6369383 | Cornish et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6607414 | Cornish et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6717135 | Hansen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6825474 | Young | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7141787 | Laprade | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7154086 | Laprade | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20030230726 | Van der Veer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040183028 | Laprade | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050109930 | Hill et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20080073516 | Laprade | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080173809 | Wu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1121858 | Apr 1982 | CA |
0704879 | Apr 1996 | EP |
2180986 | Apr 1987 | GB |
62119121 | May 1987 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100090098 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60781088 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11683713 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12644078 | US |