The systems and methods disclosed herein are directed to medical systems and medical procedures, and more particularly, to robotic systems and methods for concomitant endoscopic and percutaneous medical procedures, such as endoscopically-assisted percutaneous medical procedures and laparoscopically-assisted endoscopic procedures.
Medical procedures such as endoscopy and laparoscopy may involve accessing and visualizing the inside of a patient's anatomy for diagnostic and/or therapeutic purposes. For example, ureteroscopy is a medical procedure commonly used for the treatment of kidney stones. During the procedure, a thin, flexible tubular tool or instrument, known as a ureteroscope, may be inserted into the urethra, through the bladder and ureter, and into the kidney. In some instances, percutaneous access to the kidney may also be desired.
In certain medical procedures, surgical robotic systems may be used to control the insertion and/or manipulation of the surgical tools. Surgical robotic systems may include at least one robotic arm or other instrument positioning device including a manipulator assembly used to control the positioning of the surgical tool during the procedures.
The systems, methods and devices of this disclosure each have several innovative aspects, no single one of which is solely responsible for the desirable attributes disclosed herein.
In a first aspect, a method for performing a medical procedure comprises: inserting a first medical instrument comprising an elongated shaft and a first position sensor into a treatment region of a patient through a natural orifice of the patient; determining a first position of the first medical instrument within the treatment region with the first position sensor; defining a target location within the treatment region that is distanced from the determined first position; and percutaneously guiding a second medical instrument through the patient toward the target location.
The method may also include one or more of the following features in any combination: (a) registering an output of the first position sensor with a coordinate frame of a preoperative model, and wherein determining the first position of the instrument within the treatment region with the first position sensor comprises determining the first position with reference to the preoperative model; (b) wherein the preoperative model comprises a three dimensional reconstruction of anatomy; (c) wherein defining the target location within the treatment region comprises determining the target location with reference to the preoperative model; (d) wherein determining the target location with reference to the preoperative model comprises: displaying the preoperative model to a user, and receiving a selection of the target location with reference to the preoperative model; (e) wherein defining the target location comprises determining, with reference to the preoperative model, a difference between the determined first position and the target location; (f) displaying a representation of the target location to the user; (g) wherein defining the target location within the treatment region comprises: capturing one or more intraoperative medical images of the treatment region, and defining the target location with reference to the one or more intraoperative medical images; (h) wherein the one or more intraoperative medical images comprise one or more fluoroscopic images; (i) registering an output of the first position sensor to the one or more intraoperative medical images; (j) wherein defining the target location within the treatment region that is distanced from the determined first position comprises determining the target location along a first axis that extends from a distal end of the elongated shaft of the first medical instrument; (k) wherein percutaneously guiding the second medical instrument through the patient toward the target location comprises: aligning a second axis of the second medical instrument with the target location, and advancing the second medical instrument toward the target location; (l) wherein: the second medical instrument is attached to a robotic arm; and the robotic arm restricts motion of the second medical instrument to motion along the second axis; (m) wherein the first medical instrument comprises an endoscope; (n) wherein the first medical instrument is robotically controlled; (o) wherein the second medical instrument is robotically controlled; (p) wherein the treatment region comprises a kidney, a bladder, a lung, or a gastrointestinal tract; (q) determining patient movement with the first position sensor of the first medical instrument, and wherein percutaneously guiding the second instrument through the patient toward the target location is based in part on the determined patient movement; and/or (r) wherein the patient movement is due to respiration.
In another aspect, a method for performing a medical procedure comprises: inserting a first medical instrument comprising an elongated shaft and a first position sensor into a treatment region of a patient through a natural orifice of the patient; registering an output of the first position sensor with a coordinate frame of a preoperative model; displaying the preoperative model to a user; defining positions for one or more virtual fiducials to create a boundary with reference to the preoperative model, the positions of the one or more virtual fiducials determined based on the registered output of the first position sensor; positioning the first medical instrument such that the first position sensor is distanced from the boundary; and guiding a second instrument to or within the treatment region through a percutaneous opening based on the one or more virtual fiducials.
The method may also include one or more of the following features in any combination: (a) wherein determining the positions for the one or more virtual fiducials comprises, for each of the positions: navigating the first medical instrument to a location within the treatment region at which a virtual fiducial will be placed, and defining the location as the position of a virtual fiducial based on the registered output of the first position sensor; (b) wherein determining the positions for the one or more virtual fiducials comprises, for each of the positions: receiving a user selection of a location at which to place one of the one more virtual fiducials, and determining a virtual fiducial position corresponding to the location with reference to at least a first position determined based on the first position sensor, wherein the virtual fiducial position is distanced from the first position; (c) wherein the boundary defines a resection volume; (d) wherein the first medical instrument comprises an endoscope; (e) wherein the first medical instrument is robotically controlled; (f) wherein the treatment region comprises a kidney, a bladder, a lung, or a gastrointestinal tract; and/or (g) wherein the preoperative model is determined based on a CT scan.
In another aspect, a computer readable medium comprises instructions configured to cause at least one processor to: insert a first medical instrument comprising an elongated shaft and a first position sensor into a treatment region of a patient through a natural orifice of the patient; determine a first position of the first medical instrument within the treatment region with the first position sensor; define a target location within the treatment region that is distanced from the determined first position; and percutaneously guide a second medical instrument through the patient toward the target location.
The computer readable medium may also include one or more of the following features in any combination: (a) wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to register an output of the first position sensor with a coordinate frame of a preoperative model, and wherein determining the first position of the instrument within the treatment region with the first position sensor comprises determining the first position with reference to the preoperative model; (b) wherein the preoperative model comprises a three dimensional reconstruction of anatomy; (c) wherein defining the target location within the treatment region comprises determining the target location with reference to the preoperative model; (d) wherein determining the target location with reference to the preoperative model comprises: displaying the preoperative model to a user, and receiving a selection of the target location with reference to the preoperative mode; (e) wherein defining the target location comprises determining, with reference to the preoperative model, a difference between the determined first position and the target location; (f) wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to display a representation of the target location to the user; (g) defining the target location within the treatment region comprises: capturing one or more intraoperative medical images of the treatment region, and defining the target location with reference to the one or more intraoperative medical images; (h) wherein the one or more intraoperative medical images comprise one or more fluoroscopic images; (i) wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to register an output of the first position sensor to the one or more intraoperative medical images; (j) wherein defining the target location within the treatment region that is distanced from the determined first position comprises determining the target location along a first axis that extends from a distal end of the elongated shaft of the first medical instrument; (k) wherein percutaneously guiding the second medical instrument through the patient toward the target location comprises: aligning a second axis of the second medical instrument with the target location, and advancing the second medical instrument toward the target location; (l) wherein: the second medical instrument is attached to a robotic arm, the robotic arm restricts motion of the second medical instrument to motion along the second axis; (m) wherein the first medical instrument comprises an endoscope; (n) wherein the first medical instrument is robotically controlled; (o) the second medical instrument is robotically controlled; (p) wherein the treatment region comprises a kidney, a bladder, a lung, or a gastrointestinal tract; (q) wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to: determine patient movement with the first position sensor of the first medical instrument, and wherein percutaneously guiding the second instrument through the patient toward the target location is based in part on the determined patient movement; and/or (r) wherein the patient movement is due to respiration.
In another aspect, a medical system comprises: a first medical instrument configured to be inserted into a treatment region of a patient through a natural orifice of the patient, the first medical instrument comprising an elongated shaft and a first position sensor; a second medical instrument configured to be inserted into the treatment region through a percutaneous opening in the patient; at least one computer-readable memory having stored thereon executable instructions; and one or more processors in communication with the at least one computer-readable memory and configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least: determine a first position of the first medical instrument within the treatment region based on an output of first position sensor; define a target location within the treatment region that is distanced from the determined first position; register the target location to the determined first position; and guide the second medical instrument through a percutaneous opening toward the target location.
The system may also include one or more of the following features in any combination: (a) wherein the instructions further cause the system to register an output of the first position sensor with a coordinate frame of a preoperative model, and wherein determining the first position of the instrument within the treatment region with the first position sensor comprises determining the first position with reference to the preoperative model; (b) wherein defining the target location within the treatment region comprises determining the target location with reference to the preoperative model; (c) wherein determining the target location with reference to the preoperative model comprises: displaying the preoperative model to a user, and receiving a selection of the target location with reference to the preoperative model; (d) wherein defining the target location comprises determining, with reference to the preoperative model, a difference between the determined first position and the target location; (e) a display configured for displaying a representation of the target location to the use; (f) wherein defining the target location within the treatment region comprises: capturing one or more intraoperative medical images of the treatment region, and defining the target location with reference to the one or more intraoperative medical images; (g) wherein the one or more intraoperative medical images comprise one or more fluoroscopic images; (h) wherein the instructions further cause the system to register an output of the first position sensor to the one or more intraoperative medical images; (i) wherein defining the target location within the treatment region that is distanced from the determined first position comprises determining the target location along a first axis that extends from a distal end of the elongated shaft of the first medical instrument; (j) wherein guiding the second medical instrument through the patient toward the target location comprises: aligning a second axis of the second medical instrument with the target location, and advancing the second medical instrument toward the target location; (k) a robotic arm, wherein the second medical instrument is attached to the robotic arm, and the robotic arm restricts motion of the second medical instrument to motion along the second axis; (l) wherein the first medical instrument comprises an endoscope; (m) wherein the first medical instrument is robotically controlled; and/or (n) wherein the second medical instrument is robotically controlled.
In another aspect, a computer readable medium comprises instructions configured to cause at least one processor to: insert a first medical instrument comprising an elongated shaft and a first position sensor into a treatment region of a patient through a natural orifice of the patient; register an output of the first position sensor with a coordinate frame of a preoperative model; display the preoperative model to a user; define positions for one or more virtual fiducials to create a boundary with reference to the preoperative model, the positions of the one or more virtual fiducials determined based on the registered output of the first position sensor; position the first medical instrument such that the first position sensor is distanced from the boundary; and guide a second instrument to or within the treatment region through a percutaneous opening based on the one or more virtual fiducials.
The computer readable medium may also include one or more of the following features in any combination: (a) wherein determining the positions for the one or more virtual fiducials comprises, for each of the positions: navigating the first medical instrument to a location within the treatment region at which a virtual fiducial will be placed, and defining the location as the position of a virtual fiducial based on the registered output of the first position sensor; (b) wherein determining the positions for the one or more virtual fiducials comprises, for each of the positions: receiving a user selection of a location at which to place one of the one more virtual fiducials, and determining a virtual fiducial position corresponding to the location with reference to at least a first position determined based on the first position sensor, wherein the virtual fiducial position is distanced from the first position; (c) wherein the boundary defines a resection volume; (d) wherein the first medical instrument comprises an endoscope; (e) wherein the first medical instrument is robotically controlled; (f) wherein the treatment region comprises a kidney, a bladder, a lung, or a gastrointestinal tract; and/or (g) wherein the preoperative model is determined based on a CT scan.
In another aspect, a medical system comprises: a first medical instrument configured to be inserted into a treatment region of a patient through a natural orifice of the patient, the first medical instrument comprising an elongated shaft and a first position sensor; a second medical instrument configured to be inserted into the treatment region through a percutaneous opening in the patient; at least one computer-readable memory having stored thereon executable instructions; and one or more processors in communication with the at least one computer-readable memory and configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least: register an output of the first position sensor with a coordinate frame of a preoperative model; display the preoperative model to a user; define positions for one or more virtual fiducials to create a boundary with reference to the preoperative model, the positions of the one or more virtual fiducials determined based on the registered output of the first position sensor; and guide the second medical instrument to or within the treatment region through a percutaneous opening based on the one or more virtual fiducials.
The system may also include one or more of the following features in any combination: (a) wherein determining the positions for the one or more virtual fiducials comprises, for each of the positions: navigating the first medical instrument to a location within the treatment region at which a virtual fiducial will be placed, and defining the location as the position of a virtual fiducial based on the registered output of the first position sensor; (b) wherein determining the positions for the one or more virtual fiducials comprises, for each of the positions: receiving a user selection of a location at which to place one of the one more virtual fiducials, and determining a virtual fiducial position corresponding to the location with reference to at least a first position determined based on the first position sensor, wherein the virtual fiducial position is distanced from the first position; (c) wherein the boundary defines a resection volume; (d) wherein the first medical instrument comprises an endoscope; (e) wherein the first medical instrument is robotically controlled; (f) wherein the treatment region comprises a kidney, a bladder, a lung, or a gastrointestinal tract; and/or (g) wherein the preoperative model is determined based on a CT scan.
The disclosed aspects will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, provided to illustrate and not to limit the disclosed aspects, wherein like designations denote like elements.
1. Overview.
Aspects of the present disclosure may be integrated into a robotically-enabled medical system capable of performing a variety of medical procedures, including both minimally invasive, such as laparoscopy, and non-invasive, such as endoscopy, procedures. Among endoscopic procedures, the system may be capable of performing bronchoscopy, ureteroscopy, gastroscopy, etc.
In addition to performing the breadth of procedures, the system may provide additional benefits, such as enhanced imaging and guidance to assist the physician. Additionally, the system may provide the physician with the ability to perform the procedure from an ergonomic position without the need for awkward arm motions and positions. Still further, the system may provide the physician with the ability to perform the procedure with improved ease of use such that one or more of the instruments of the system can be controlled by a single user.
Various embodiments will be described below in conjunction with the drawings for purposes of illustration. It should be appreciated that many other implementations of the disclosed concepts are possible, and various advantages can be achieved with the disclosed implementations. Headings are included herein for reference and to aid in locating various sections. These headings are not intended to limit the scope of the concepts described with respect thereto. Such concepts may have applicability throughout the entire specification.
A. Robotic System—Cart.
The robotically-enabled medical system may be configured in a variety of ways depending on the particular procedure.
With continued reference to
The endoscope 13 may be directed down the patient's trachea and lungs after insertion using precise commands from the robotic system until reaching the target destination or operative site. In order to enhance navigation through the patient's lung network and/or reach the desired target, the endoscope 13 may be manipulated to telescopically extend the inner leader portion from the outer sheath portion to obtain enhanced articulation and greater bend radius. The use of separate instrument drivers 28 also allows the leader portion and sheath portion to be driven independently of each other.
For example, the endoscope 13 may be directed to deliver a biopsy needle to a target, such as, for example, a lesion or nodule within the lungs of a patient. The needle may be deployed down a working channel that runs the length of the endoscope to obtain a tissue sample to be analyzed by a pathologist. Depending on the pathology results, additional tools may be deployed down the working channel of the endoscope for additional biopsies. After identifying a nodule to be malignant, the endoscope 13 may endoscopically deliver tools to resect the potentially cancerous tissue. In some instances, diagnostic and therapeutic treatments can be delivered in separate procedures. In those circumstances, the endoscope 13 may also be used to deliver a fiducial to “mark” the location of the target nodule as well. In other instances, diagnostic and therapeutic treatments may be delivered during the same procedure.
The system 10 may also include a movable tower 30, which may be connected via support cables to the cart 11 to provide support for controls, electronics, fluidics, optics, sensors, and/or power to the cart 11. Placing such functionality in the tower 30 allows for a smaller form factor cart 11 that may be more easily adjusted and/or re-positioned by an operating physician and his/her staff. Additionally, the division of functionality between the cart/table and the support tower 30 reduces operating room clutter and facilitates improving clinical workflow. While the cart 11 may be positioned close to the patient, the tower 30 may be stowed in a remote location to stay out of the way during a procedure.
In support of the robotic systems described above, the tower 30 may include component(s) of a computer-based control system that stores computer program instructions, for example, within a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium such as a persistent magnetic storage drive, solid state drive, etc. The execution of those instructions, whether the execution occurs in the tower 30 or the cart 11, may control the entire system or sub-system(s) thereof. For example, when executed by a processor of the computer system, the instructions may cause the components of the robotics system to actuate the relevant carriages and arm mounts, actuate the robotics arms, and control the medical instruments. For example, in response to receiving the control signal, the motors in the joints of the robotics arms may position the arms into a certain posture.
The tower 30 may also include a pump, flow meter, valve control, and/or fluid access in order to provide controlled irrigation and aspiration capabilities to the system that may be deployed through the endoscope 13. These components may also be controlled using the computer system of the tower 30. In some embodiments, irrigation and aspiration capabilities may be delivered directly to the endoscope 13 through separate cable(s).
The tower 30 may include a voltage and surge protector designed to provide filtered and protected electrical power to the cart 11, thereby avoiding placement of a power transformer and other auxiliary power components in the cart 11, resulting in a smaller, more moveable cart 11.
The tower 30 may also include support equipment for the sensors deployed throughout the robotic system 10. For example, the tower 30 may include optoelectronics equipment for detecting, receiving, and processing data received from the optical sensors or cameras throughout the robotic system 10. In combination with the control system, such optoelectronics equipment may be used to generate real-time images for display in any number of consoles deployed throughout the system, including in the tower 30. Similarly, the tower 30 may also include an electronic subsystem for receiving and processing signals received from deployed electromagnetic (EM) sensors. The tower 30 may also be used to house and position an EM field generator for detection by EM sensors in or on the medical instrument.
The tower 30 may also include a console 31 in addition to other consoles available in the rest of the system, e.g., console mounted on top of the cart. The console 31 may include a user interface and a display screen, such as a touchscreen, for the physician operator. Consoles in the system 10 are generally designed to provide both robotic controls as well as preoperative and real-time information of the procedure, such as navigational and localization information of the endoscope 13. When the console 31 is not the only console available to the physician, it may be used by a second operator, such as a nurse, to monitor the health or vitals of the patient and the operation of the system 10, as well as to provide procedure-specific data, such as navigational and localization information. In other embodiments, the console 30 is housed in a body that is separate from the tower 30.
The tower 30 may be coupled to the cart 11 and endoscope 13 through one or more cables or connections (not shown). In some embodiments, the support functionality from the tower 30 may be provided through a single cable to the cart 11, simplifying and de-cluttering the operating room. In other embodiments, specific functionality may be coupled in separate cabling and connections. For example, while power may be provided through a single power cable to the cart 11, the support for controls, optics, fluidics, and/or navigation may be provided through a separate cable.
The carriage interface 19 is connected to the column 14 through slots, such as slot 20, that are positioned on opposite sides of the column 14 to guide the vertical translation of the carriage 17. The slot 20 contains a vertical translation interface to position and hold the carriage 17 at various vertical heights relative to the cart base 15. Vertical translation of the carriage 17 allows the cart 11 to adjust the reach of the robotic arms 12 to meet a variety of table heights, patient sizes, and physician preferences. Similarly, the individually configurable arm mounts on the carriage 17 allow the robotic arm base 21 of the robotic arms 12 to be angled in a variety of configurations.
In some embodiments, the slot 20 may be supplemented with slot covers that are flush and parallel to the slot surface to prevent dirt and fluid ingress into the internal chambers of the column 14 and the vertical translation interface as the carriage 17 vertically translates. The slot covers may be deployed through pairs of spring spools positioned near the vertical top and bottom of the slot 20. The covers are coiled within the spools until deployed to extend and retract from their coiled state as the carriage 17 vertically translates up and down. The spring-loading of the spools provides force to retract the cover into a spool when the carriage 17 translates towards the spool, while also maintaining a tight seal when the carriage 17 translates away from the spool. The covers may be connected to the carriage 17 using, for example, brackets in the carriage interface 19 to ensure proper extension and retraction of the cover as the carriage 17 translates.
The column 14 may internally comprise mechanisms, such as gears and motors, that are designed to use a vertically aligned lead screw to translate the carriage 17 in a mechanized fashion in response to control signals generated in response to user inputs, e.g., inputs from the console 16.
The robotic arms 12 may generally comprise robotic arm bases 21 and end effectors 22, separated by a series of linkages 23 that are connected by a series of joints 24, each joint comprising an independent actuator, each actuator comprising an independently controllable motor. Each independently controllable joint represents an independent degree of freedom available to the robotic arm 12. Each of the robotic arms 12 may have seven joints, and thus provide seven degrees of freedom. A multitude of joints result in a multitude of degrees of freedom, allowing for “redundant” degrees of freedom. Having redundant degrees of freedom allows the robotic arms 12 to position their respective end effectors 22 at a specific position, orientation, and trajectory in space using different linkage positions and joint angles. This allows for the system to position and direct a medical instrument from a desired point in space while allowing the physician to move the arm joints into a clinically advantageous position away from the patient to create greater access, while avoiding arm collisions.
The cart base 15 balances the weight of the column 14, carriage 17, and robotic arms 12 over the floor. Accordingly, the cart base 15 houses heavier components, such as electronics, motors, power supply, as well as components that either enable movement and/or immobilize the cart 11. For example, the cart base 15 includes rollable wheel-shaped casters 25 that allow for the cart 11 to easily move around the room prior to a procedure. After reaching the appropriate position, the casters 25 may be immobilized using wheel locks to hold the cart 11 in place during the procedure.
Positioned at the vertical end of the column 14, the console 16 allows for both a user interface for receiving user input and a display screen (or a dual-purpose device such as, for example, a touchscreen 26) to provide the physician user with both preoperative and intraoperative data. Potential preoperative data on the touchscreen 26 may include preoperative plans, navigation and mapping data derived from preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans, and/or notes from pre-operative patient interviews. Intraoperative data on display may include optical information provided from the tool, sensor and coordinate information from sensors, as well as vital patient statistics, such as respiration, heart rate, and/or pulse. The console 16 may be positioned and tilted to allow a physician to access the console 16 from the side of the column 14 opposite the carriage 17. From this position, the physician may view the console 16, robotic arms 12, and patient while operating the console 16 from behind the cart 11. As shown, the console 16 also includes a handle 27 to assist with maneuvering and stabilizing cart 11.
After insertion into the urethra, using similar control techniques as in bronchoscopy, the ureteroscope 32 may be navigated into the bladder, ureters, and/or kidneys for diagnostic and/or therapeutic applications. For example, the ureteroscope 32 may be directed into the ureter and kidneys to break up kidney stone build up using a laser or ultrasonic lithotripsy device deployed down the working channel of the ureteroscope 32. After lithotripsy is complete, the resulting stone fragments may be removed using baskets deployed down the ureteroscope 32.
B. Robotic System—Table.
Embodiments of the robotically-enabled medical system may also incorporate the patient's table. Incorporation of the table reduces the amount of capital equipment within the operating room by removing the cart, which allows greater access to the patient.
The robotic arms 39 may be mounted on the carriages 43 through a set of arm mounts 45 comprising a series of joints that may individually rotate and/or telescopically extend to provide additional configurability to the robotic arms 39. Additionally, the arm mounts 45 may be positioned on the carriages 43 such that, when the carriages 43 are appropriately rotated, the arm mounts 45 may be positioned on either the same side of the table 38 (as shown in
The column 37 structurally provides support for the table 38, and a path for vertical translation of the carriages 43. Internally, the column 37 may be equipped with lead screws for guiding vertical translation of the carriages, and motors to mechanize the translation of the carriages 43 based the lead screws. The column 37 may also convey power and control signals to the carriages 43 and the robotic arms 39 mounted thereon.
The table base 46 serves a similar function as the cart base 15 in the cart 11 shown in
With continued reference to
In some embodiments, a table base may stow and store the robotic arms when not in use.
In a laparoscopic procedure, through small incision(s) in the patient's abdominal wall, minimally invasive instruments may be inserted into the patient's anatomy. In some embodiments, the minimally invasive instruments comprise an elongated rigid member, such as a shaft, which is used to access anatomy within the patient. After inflation of the patient's abdominal cavity, the instruments may be directed to perform surgical or medical tasks, such as grasping, cutting, ablating, suturing, etc. In some embodiments, the instruments can comprise a scope, such as a laparoscope.
To accommodate laparoscopic procedures, the robotically-enabled table system may also tilt the platform to a desired angle.
For example, pitch adjustments are particularly useful when trying to position the table in a Trendelenburg position, i.e., position the patient's lower abdomen at a higher position from the floor than the patient's upper abdomen, for lower abdominal surgery. The Trendelenburg position causes the patient's internal organs to slide towards his/her upper abdomen through the force of gravity, clearing out the abdominal cavity for minimally invasive tools to enter and perform lower abdominal surgical or medical procedures, such as laparoscopic prostatectomy.
The adjustable arm support 105 can provide several degrees of freedom, including lift, lateral translation, tilt, etc. In the illustrated embodiment of
The surgical robotics system 100 in
The adjustable arm support 105 can be mounted to the column 102. In other embodiments, the arm support 105 can be mounted to the table 101 or base 103. The adjustable arm support 105 can include a carriage 109, a bar or rail connector 111 and a bar or rail 107. In some embodiments, one or more robotic arms mounted to the rail 107 can translate and move relative to one another.
The carriage 109 can be attached to the column 102 by a first joint 113, which allows the carriage 109 to move relative to the column 102 (e.g., such as up and down a first or vertical axis 123). The first joint 113 can provide the first degree of freedom (“Z-lift”) to the adjustable arm support 105. The adjustable arm support 105 can include a second joint 115, which provides the second degree of freedom (tilt) for the adjustable arm support 105. The adjustable arm support 105 can include a third joint 117, which can provide the third degree of freedom (“pivot up”) for the adjustable arm support 105. An additional joint 119 (shown in
In some embodiments, one or more of the robotic arms 142A, 142B comprises an arm with seven or more degrees of freedom. In some embodiments, one or more of the robotic arms 142A, 142B can include eight degrees of freedom, including an insertion axis (1-degree of freedom including insertion), a wrist (3-degrees of freedom including wrist pitch, yaw and roll), an elbow (1-degree of freedom including elbow pitch), a shoulder (2-degrees of freedom including shoulder pitch and yaw), and base 144A, 144B (1-degree of freedom including translation). In some embodiments, the insertion degree of freedom can be provided by the robotic arm 142A, 142B, while in other embodiments, the instrument itself provides insertion via an instrument-based insertion architecture.
C. Instrument Driver & Interface.
The end effectors of the system's robotic arms may comprise (i) an instrument driver (alternatively referred to as “instrument drive mechanism” or “instrument device manipulator”) that incorporates electro-mechanical means for actuating the medical instrument and (ii) a removable or detachable medical instrument, which may be devoid of any electro-mechanical components, such as motors. This dichotomy may be driven by the need to sterilize medical instruments used in medical procedures, and the inability to adequately sterilize expensive capital equipment due to their intricate mechanical assemblies and sensitive electronics. Accordingly, the medical instruments may be designed to be detached, removed, and interchanged from the instrument driver (and thus the system) for individual sterilization or disposal by the physician or the physician's staff. In contrast, the instrument drivers need not be changed or sterilized, and may be draped for protection.
For procedures that require a sterile environment, the robotic system may incorporate a drive interface, such as a sterile adapter connected to a sterile drape, that sits between the instrument driver and the medical instrument. The chief purpose of the sterile adapter is to transfer angular motion from the drive shafts of the instrument driver to the drive inputs of the instrument while maintaining physical separation, and thus sterility, between the drive shafts and drive inputs. Accordingly, an example sterile adapter may comprise a series of rotational inputs and outputs intended to be mated with the drive shafts of the instrument driver and drive inputs on the instrument. Connected to the sterile adapter, the sterile drape, comprised of a thin, flexible material such as transparent or translucent plastic, is designed to cover the capital equipment, such as the instrument driver, robotic arm, and cart (in a cart-based system) or table (in a table-based system). Use of the drape would allow the capital equipment to be positioned proximate to the patient while still being located in an area not requiring sterilization (i.e., non-sterile field). On the other side of the sterile drape, the medical instrument may interface with the patient in an area requiring sterilization (i.e., sterile field).
D. Medical Instrument.
The elongated shaft 71 is designed to be delivered through either an anatomical opening or lumen, e.g., as in endoscopy, or a minimally invasive incision, e.g., as in laparoscopy. The elongated shaft 71 may be either flexible (e.g., having properties similar to an endoscope) or rigid (e.g., having properties similar to a laparoscope) or contain a customized combination of both flexible and rigid portions. When designed for laparoscopy, the distal end of a rigid elongated shaft may be connected to an end effector extending from a jointed wrist formed from a clevis with at least one degree of freedom and a surgical tool or medical instrument, such as, for example, a grasper or scissors, that may be actuated based on force from the tendons as the drive inputs rotate in response to torque received from the drive outputs 74 of the instrument driver 75. When designed for endoscopy, the distal end of a flexible elongated shaft may include a steerable or controllable bending section that may be articulated and bent based on torque received from the drive outputs 74 of the instrument driver 75.
Torque from the instrument driver 75 is transmitted down the elongated shaft 71 using tendons along the elongated shaft 71. These individual tendons, such as pull wires, may be individually anchored to individual drive inputs 73 within the instrument handle 72. From the handle 72, the tendons are directed down one or more pull lumens along the elongated shaft 71 and anchored at the distal portion of the elongated shaft 71, or in the wrist at the distal portion of the elongated shaft. During a surgical procedure, such as a laparoscopic, endoscopic or hybrid procedure, these tendons may be coupled to a distally mounted end effector, such as a wrist, grasper, or scissor. Under such an arrangement, torque exerted on drive inputs 73 would transfer tension to the tendon, thereby causing the end effector to actuate in some way. In some embodiments, during a surgical procedure, the tendon may cause a joint to rotate about an axis, thereby causing the end effector to move in one direction or another. Alternatively, the tendon may be connected to one or more jaws of a grasper at the distal end of the elongated shaft 71, where tension from the tendon causes the grasper to close.
In endoscopy, the tendons may be coupled to a bending or articulating section positioned along the elongated shaft 71 (e.g., at the distal end) via adhesive, control ring, or other mechanical fixation. When fixedly attached to the distal end of a bending section, torque exerted on the drive inputs 73 would be transmitted down the tendons, causing the softer, bending section (sometimes referred to as the articulable section or region) to bend or articulate. Along the non-bending sections, it may be advantageous to spiral or helix the individual pull lumens that direct the individual tendons along (or inside) the walls of the endoscope shaft to balance the radial forces that result from tension in the pull wires. The angle of the spiraling and/or spacing therebetween may be altered or engineered for specific purposes, wherein tighter spiraling exhibits lesser shaft compression under load forces, while lower amounts of spiraling results in greater shaft compression under load forces, but limits bending. On the other end of the spectrum, the pull lumens may be directed parallel to the longitudinal axis of the elongated shaft 71 to allow for controlled articulation in the desired bending or articulable sections.
In endoscopy, the elongated shaft 71 houses a number of components to assist with the robotic procedure. The shaft 71 may comprise a working channel for deploying surgical tools (or medical instruments), irrigation, and/or aspiration to the operative region at the distal end of the shaft 71. The shaft 71 may also accommodate wires and/or optical fibers to transfer signals to/from an optical assembly at the distal tip, which may include an optical camera. The shaft 71 may also accommodate optical fibers to carry light from proximally-located light sources, such as light emitting diodes, to the distal end of the shaft 71.
At the distal end of the instrument 70, the distal tip may also comprise the opening of a working channel for delivering tools for diagnostic and/or therapy, irrigation, and aspiration to an operative site. The distal tip may also include a port for a camera, such as a fiberscope or a digital camera, to capture images of an internal anatomical space. Relatedly, the distal tip may also include ports for light sources for illuminating the anatomical space when using the camera.
In the example of
Like earlier disclosed embodiments, an instrument 86 may comprise an elongated shaft portion 88 and an instrument base 87 (shown with a transparent external skin for discussion purposes) comprising a plurality of drive inputs 89 (such as receptacles, pulleys, and spools) that are configured to receive the drive outputs 81 in the instrument driver 80. Unlike prior disclosed embodiments, the instrument shaft 88 extends from the center of the instrument base 87 with an axis substantially parallel to the axes of the drive inputs 89, rather than orthogonal as in the design of
When coupled to the rotational assembly 83 of the instrument driver 80, the medical instrument 86, comprising instrument base 87 and instrument shaft 88, rotates in combination with the rotational assembly 83 about the instrument driver axis 85. Since the instrument shaft 88 is positioned at the center of instrument base 87, the instrument shaft 88 is coaxial with instrument driver axis 85 when attached. Thus, rotation of the rotational assembly 83 causes the instrument shaft 88 to rotate about its own longitudinal axis. Moreover, as the instrument base 87 rotates with the instrument shaft 88, any tendons connected to the drive inputs 89 in the instrument base 87 are not tangled during rotation. Accordingly, the parallelism of the axes of the drive outputs 81, drive inputs 89, and instrument shaft 88 allows for the shaft rotation without tangling any control tendons.
The instrument handle 170, which may also be referred to as an instrument base, may generally comprise an attachment interface 172 having one or more mechanical inputs 174, e.g., receptacles, pulleys or spools, that are designed to be reciprocally mated with one or more torque couplers on an attachment surface of an instrument driver.
In some embodiments, the instrument 150 comprises a series of pulleys or cables that enable the elongated shaft 152 to translate relative to the handle 170. In other words, the instrument 150 itself comprises an instrument-based insertion architecture that accommodates insertion of the instrument, thereby minimizing the reliance on a robot arm to provide insertion of the instrument 150. In other embodiments, a robotic arm can be largely responsible for instrument insertion.
E. Controller.
Any of the robotic systems described herein can include an input device or controller for manipulating an instrument attached to a robotic arm. In some embodiments, the controller can be coupled (e.g., communicatively, electronically, electrically, wirelessly and/or mechanically) with an instrument such that manipulation of the controller causes a corresponding manipulation of the instrument e.g., via master slave control.
In the illustrated embodiment, the controller 182 is configured to allow manipulation of two medical instruments, and includes two handles 184. Each of the handles 184 is connected to a gimbal 186. Each gimbal 186 is connected to a positioning platform 188.
As shown in
In some embodiments, one or more load cells are positioned in the controller. For example, in some embodiments, a load cell (not shown) is positioned in the body of each of the gimbals 186. By providing a load cell, portions of the controller 182 are capable of operating under admittance control, thereby advantageously reducing the perceived inertia of the controller while in use. In some embodiments, the positioning platform 188 is configured for admittance control, while the gimbal 186 is configured for impedance control. In other embodiments, the gimbal 186 is configured for admittance control, while the positioning platform 188 is configured for impedance control. Accordingly, for some embodiments, the translational or positional degrees of freedom of the positioning platform 188 can rely on admittance control, while the rotational degrees of freedom of the gimbal 186 rely on impedance control.
F. Navigation and Control.
Traditional endoscopy may involve the use of fluoroscopy (e.g., as may be delivered through a C-arm) and other forms of radiation-based imaging modalities to provide endoluminal guidance to an operator physician. In contrast, the robotic systems contemplated by this disclosure can provide for non-radiation-based navigational and localization means to reduce physician exposure to radiation and reduce the amount of equipment within the operating room. As used herein, the term “localization” may refer to determining and/or monitoring the position of objects in a reference coordinate system. Technologies such as preoperative mapping, computer vision, real-time EM tracking, and robot command data may be used individually or in combination to achieve a radiation-free operating environment. In other cases, where radiation-based imaging modalities are still used, the preoperative mapping, computer vision, real-time EM tracking, and robot command data may be used individually or in combination to improve upon the information obtained solely through radiation-based imaging modalities.
As shown in
The various input data 91-94 are now described in greater detail. Preoperative mapping may be accomplished through the use of the collection of low dose CT scans. Preoperative CT scans are reconstructed into three-dimensional images, which are visualized, e.g. as “slices” of a cutaway view of the patient's internal anatomy. When analyzed in the aggregate, image-based models for anatomical cavities, spaces and structures of the patient's anatomy, such as a patient lung network, may be generated. Techniques such as center-line geometry may be determined and approximated from the CT images to develop a three-dimensional volume of the patient's anatomy, referred to as model data 91 (also referred to as “preoperative model data” when generated using only preoperative CT scans). The use of center-line geometry is discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/523,760, the contents of which are herein incorporated in its entirety. Network topological models may also be derived from the CT-images, and are particularly appropriate for bronchoscopy.
In some embodiments, the instrument may be equipped with a camera to provide vision data (or image data) 92. The localization module 95 may process the vision data 92 to enable one or more vision-based (or image-based) location tracking modules or features. For example, the preoperative model data 91 may be used in conjunction with the vision data 92 to enable computer vision-based tracking of the medical instrument (e.g., an endoscope or an instrument advance through a working channel of the endoscope). For example, using the preoperative model data 91, the robotic system may generate a library of expected endoscopic images from the model based on the expected path of travel of the endoscope, each image linked to a location within the model. Intraoperatively, this library may be referenced by the robotic system in order to compare real-time images captured at the camera (e.g., a camera at a distal end of the endoscope) to those in the image library to assist localization.
Other computer vision-based tracking techniques use feature tracking to determine motion of the camera, and thus the endoscope. Some features of the localization module 95 may identify circular geometries in the preoperative model data 91 that correspond to anatomical lumens and track the change of those geometries to determine which anatomical lumen was selected, as well as the relative rotational and/or translational motion of the camera. Use of a topological map may further enhance vision-based algorithms or techniques.
Optical flow, another computer vision-based technique, may analyze the displacement and translation of image pixels in a video sequence in the vision data 92 to infer camera movement. Examples of optical flow techniques may include motion detection, object segmentation calculations, luminance, motion compensated encoding, stereo disparity measurement, etc. Through the comparison of multiple frames over multiple iterations, movement and location of the camera (and thus the endoscope) may be determined.
The localization module 95 may use real-time EM tracking to generate a real-time location of the endoscope in a global coordinate system that may be registered to the patient's anatomy, represented by the preoperative model. In EM tracking, an EM sensor (or tracker) comprising one or more sensor coils embedded in one or more locations and orientations in a medical instrument (e.g., an endoscopic tool) measures the variation in the EM field created by one or more static EM field generators positioned at a known location. The location information detected by the EM sensors is stored as EM data 93. The EM field generator (or transmitter), may be placed close to the patient to create a low intensity magnetic field that the embedded sensor may detect. The magnetic field induces small currents in the sensor coils of the EM sensor, which may be analyzed to determine the distance and angle between the EM sensor and the EM field generator. These distances and orientations may be intraoperatively “registered” to the patient anatomy (e.g., the preoperative model) in order to determine the geometric transformation that aligns a single location in the coordinate system with a position in the preoperative model of the patient's anatomy. Once registered, an embedded EM tracker in one or more positions of the medical instrument (e.g., the distal tip of an endoscope) may provide real-time indications of the progression of the medical instrument through the patient's anatomy.
Robotic command and kinematics data 94 may also be used by the localization module 95 to provide localization data 96 for the robotic system. Device pitch and yaw resulting from articulation commands may be determined during preoperative calibration. Intraoperatively, these calibration measurements may be used in combination with known insertion depth information to estimate the position of the instrument. Alternatively, these calculations may be analyzed in combination with EM, vision, and/or topological modeling to estimate the position of the medical instrument within the network.
As
The localization module 95 may use the input data 91-94 in combination(s). In some cases, such a combination may use a probabilistic approach where the localization module 95 assigns a confidence weight to the location determined from each of the input data 91-94. Thus, where the EM data may not be reliable (as may be the case where there is EM interference) the confidence of the location determined by the EM data 93 can be decrease and the localization module 95 may rely more heavily on the vision data 92 and/or the robotic command and kinematics data 94.
As discussed above, the robotic systems discussed herein may be designed to incorporate a combination of one or more of the technologies above. The robotic system's computer-based control system, based in the tower, bed and/or cart, may store computer program instructions, for example, within a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium such as a persistent magnetic storage drive, solid state drive, or the like, that, upon execution, cause the system to receive and analyze sensor data and user commands, generate control signals throughout the system, and display the navigational and localization data, such as the position of the instrument within the global coordinate system, anatomical map, etc.
2. Robotic Systems and Methods for Concomitant Endoscopic AND Percutaneous Medical Procedures.
Embodiments of the disclosure relate to robotic systems and methods for concomitant endoscopic and percutaneous medical procedures, such as endoscopically-assisted percutaneous (or laparposic) medical procedures and laparoscopically-assisted endoscopic procedures. The systems and methods can be embodied in or employed using robotically-enabled medical systems, such as those described above with reference to
Many medical procedures involve guiding a medical instrument to a target location within a treatment region of a patient. In some instances, these medical procedures can involve percutaneously guiding the medical instrument through an opening (such as a percutaneous access port) to the target region. Because the target location is often internal, it can be difficult to accurately guide the medical instrument to the target location. Commonly, physicians, and in particular, highly trained radiologists, rely on live fluoroscopic images to guide the medical instrument to the target location. Still, such procedures are difficult. The radiologist must derive a three-dimensional path to the target location from two-dimensional fluoroscopic images, often leading to imprecise guidance and placement of the medical instrument. Further, use of fluoroscopy undesirably exposes the patient and medical staff to radiation for a prolonged period of time.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), for example, is a medical procedure that involves gaining percutaneous access to a kidney for removal of kidney stones. Commonly, PCNL is performed in two steps. First, a radiologist percutaneously guides an access sheath into the kidney to gain access to the treatment region. The radiologist relies on two-dimensional fluoroscopic images to guide and place the access sheath. Second, with the access sheath in place, a urologist then accesses the treatment region through the access sheath to remove the kidney stone. The common need for a radiologist to perform the first part of the procedure adds cost, complication, and operation scheduling time delay to a procedure that would ideally need only the urologist and their staff to perform. Further, because the radiologist is not trained in urology, the radiologist often places the access sheath in a suboptimal position. However, the urologist must rely on the radiologist to place the access sheath because the urologist is not trained in radiology and thus cannot guide the access sheath himself. Because the radiologist relies on fluoroscopic imaging techniques, another disadvantage of PCNL is the radiation exposure mentioned above.
The methods and systems for concomitant endoscopic and percutaneous medical procedures described in this application can provide improved guidance and placement of percutaneous and/or endoscopic medical instruments. As will be described in greater detail with reference to the following illustrated examples, the methods and systems can be advantageously employed to define rendezvous points for medical instruments within a treatment region and/or to define boundaries within the treatment region for use during the procedure.
As will be described in further detail below, the endoscopically-assisted PCNL procedure illustrated in
As mentioned above,
In the illustrated example, to accurately place the access sheath, first, the first medical instrument 204 can be guided into the kidney 202. In some embodiments, the first medical instrument 204 is inserted into the patient through a natural orifice. For example, the first medical instrument 204 can be inserted through the urethra, bladder, and ureter into the kidney 202. In some embodiments or in other procedures, other natural patient orifices can be used. In some embodiments, the first medical instrument 204 can be inserted percutaneously.
The first medical instrument 204 can be an endoscope. In some embodiments, the first medical instrument 204 can be robotically controlled. For example, the first medical instrument can by any of the robotically-controllable medical instruments described above with reference to
Also illustrated in
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, the target location 208 can be determined with reference to the position sensor 206 but at a position that is distanced from the position sensor 206. That is, the target location 208 need not be coincident with the position sensor 206 (or any other point on the first medical instrument 204).
For example, in some embodiments, the output of the position sensor 206 can be registered to a preoperative model of the kidney 202. Registration can involve, for example, using the position sensor 206 to map the path of the first medical instrument 204 through the anatomy, and matching the mapped path to the preoperative model. As another example, registration can involve navigating the medical instrument 204 to one or more anatomical landmarks, and using the output of the position sensor 206 at the one or more anatomical landmarks to register the preoperative model to the output of the position sensor 206. Additional detail on registration is provided above with reference to localization system 90 and
In another example, the target location 208 can be determined with reference to intraoperative medical imaging, such as one or more fluoroscopic images. For example, an operator can select a location on a fluoroscopic image as the target location 208. Again, the target location 208 can be distanced from the position sensor 206. In some embodiments, the output of the position sensor can be registered to the fluoroscopic image such that a relationship between the target location 208 and the position sensor 206 can be determined. As an example, the position sensor 206 can be an electromagnetic (EM) sensor. The EM base frame can be registered to a pre-operative CT image by moving the instrument including the EM sensor back and force in a known bronchial branch. This can generate corresponding point pairs in both coordinate frames (i.e., the EM base frame and the fluoroscopic frame). With the corresponding point pairs, algorithms can be used to determine a transform between the coordinate frames. This process is often or generally referred to as registration. Once the transform is determined, the position sensor 206 can be shown in the fluoroscopic image frame, and the relationship between the target location 208 defined in image frame and the sensor can be determined.
In some embodiments, the target location 208 is selected along an axis 216 that extends outwardly from the distal tip of the elongated shaft 205 of the first medical instrument 204 (as shown, for example, in
Selecting a target location 208 that is distanced from the position sensor 206 can advantageously allow the use of target locations 208 that are not directly accessible by the first medical instrument 204. For example, in the illustrated example, the kidney stone 212 is positioned in an entrance of a calyx. In this position, the kidney stone 212 may prevent the medical instrument 204 from navigating into the calyx. Advantageously, the target location 208 can be projected into the calyx, even if the first medical instrument 204 is not physically able to navigate into the calyx. Similarly, the target location 208 can be determined at positions that cannot even be visualized with the first medical instrument 204. In the illustrated example, the kidney stone 212 may even block visual access to the calyx. Regardless, the target location 208 can be advantageously projected into the calyx.
As shown in
In some embodiments, the second medical instrument 214 can be positioned on an instrument positioning device, such as a robotic arm. The instrument positioning device can be robotically controlled to automatically align the second medical instrument 214 with the target location. For example, the second medical instrument 214 can be robotically aligned with the target location 208 based on the position of the instrument positioning device or an output of a position sensor on the second medical instrument 214.
In some embodiments, the second medical instrument 214 can be manually aligned with the target location 208. In such embodiments, the second medical instrument 214 can include one or more position sensors for determining the position and orientation of the second medical instrument 214. An example process for aligning the second medical instrument 214 will be described in greater detail below with reference to
As shown in
Insertion of the second medical instrument 214 can occur in a variety of ways. For example, insertion can be manual or robotic. In some manual embodiments, a physician manually inserts the second medical instrument 214. The physician can guide the second medical instrument 214 toward the target location 208. In some embodiments, an alignment interface can be provided that aids the physician in maintaining alignment of the medical instrument 214 with the target location 208 during insertion. An example alignment interface is shown in
In some embodiments, the insertion of the second medical instrument 214 can be robotic. The second medical instrument 214 can be positioned on an instrument positioning device, such as a robotic arm. In some embodiments, the instrument positioning device maintains alignment during insertion while the physician inserts the second medical instrument 214 by physically handling (e.g., pushing) the second medical instrument 214 (or the instrument positioning device). In these embodiments, alignment can be maintained robotically, while the actual insertion of the second medical instrument 214 is performed manually. For example, the physician can hold a handle on the second medical instrument 214 or the instrument positioning device to push the second medical instrument 214 into the patient. The instrument positioning device can limit or restrict motion of the second medical instrument 214 to motions along the axis of insertion. For example, the instrument positioning device can limit or prevent motions that would cause the second medical instrument 214 to move out of alignment with the target location 208. In some embodiments, motion is limited to only along the insertion axis. In some embodiments, motion is limited to a range around the insertion axis. For example, motion can be limited to within a cone-shaped or cylindrical-shaped boundary around the insertion axis. In some embodiments, the motion is limited by haptic boundaries. Haptic boundaries can physically limit motion outside of the allowed range or provide tactile feedback to the physician that the motion is off track.
In some embodiments, the physician commands insertion using a controller, and both alignment and insertion are performed robotically. As in the previous example, the robotic system can limit or prevent motion such that the second medical instrument 214 remains in alignment with the target location 208.
In some embodiments, during alignment (
In some embodiments, insertion of the second medical instrument 214 stops when the second medical instrument 214 reaches the target location 208 as shown in
As mentioned above,
As shown in
Once the second medical instrument 214 is positioned within the zone 226 (to provide a gross alignment), the physician may then focus on aligning the axis 218 of the second medical instrument 214 with the target location 208. An example of this step is illustrated in
An alignment interface can be used to facilitate alignment of the axis 218 with the target location 208. In some embodiments, the alignment interface is a graphical user interface that provides a visual representation of alignment. An example of such an alignment interface is shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, the alignment interface 230 is representative of a view of alignment looking down the shaft of the second medical instrument 214. For example, as illustrated in
The alignment interface 230 can be displayed to the user, for example, as part of a graphical user interface for the robotic system.
As will be described in further detail below, the endoscopically-assisted resection procedure illustrated in
The first medical instrument 304 can be an endoscope, such as a bronchoscope. In some embodiments, the first medical instrument 304 can be robotically controlled. For example, the first medical instrument 304 can by any of the robotically-controllable medical instruments described above with reference to
As shown in
In some embodiments, virtual fiducials 308 are placed by navigating the first medical instrument 304 to a position within the lung 302 at which it is desired to place a virtual fiducial 308, determining that position using the position sensor 306, and virtual placing the virtual fiducial within the preoperative model at that determined position. The physician can then navigate the first medical instrument 304 to the next position at which it is desired to place a virtual fiducial 308 and repeat the process until all desired virtual fiducials 308 are placed.
In some embodiments, with the preoperative model registered to the patient's anatomy and the output of the position sensor 306, positions for placement of the virtual fiducials 308 can be selected with reference to the preoperative model. For example, in some embodiments, the positions for the virtual fiducials 308 can be determined with reference to the position sensor 306 but at positions that are distanced from the position sensor 306. That is, in some embodiments, the locations of the virtual fiducials 308 need not be coincident with the position sensor 306 (or any other portion of the medical instrument 314). For example, the preoperative model can be displayed to the physician, and the physician can select the placement locations for the virtual fiducials 308 on the displayed preoperative model.
In some embodiments, the positions of the virtual fiducials 308 can be determined preoperatively with reference to the preoperative model. The first medical instrument 304 can then be navigated into the lung 302 to register the preoperative model to the anatomy. In some embodiments, the first medical instrument 304 can be used to verify the placement of the preoperatively selected positions of the virtual fiducials 308, by for example, navigating to locations that correspond to the positions of the virtual fiducials 308. In some embodiments, the physician may then adjust the placement positions of the virtual fiducials 308 intraoperatively, if desired.
In another example, the positions of the virtual fiducials 308 can be determined with reference to intraoperative medical imaging, such as fluoroscopic images. For example, an operator can select the positions of the virtual fiducials 308 on a fluoroscopic image.
The positions of the virtual fiducials 308 may be displayed to the user, for example, on a graphical user interface as shown in
As shown in
The boundary 309 (or the virtual fiducials 308 themselves) can be used to guide one or more second medical instruments 314 during resection. Resection can be performed percutaneously, although this need not be the case in all embodiments. In the illustrated embodiments, two second medical instruments 314 are illustrated. The second medical instruments can be, for example, laparoscopic medical instruments, such as those described above with reference to
In some embodiments, the second medical instruments 314 can be manually controlled. The system can provide an indication of when the second medical instruments 314 are approaching the boundary 309 so that the physician is alerted. The indication can be a visual, audible, or haptic signal.
In some embodiments, during resection with the second medical instruments 314, the first medical instrument 304 remains in the treatment region (e.g., in the lung 302). As described above, the output signal of the position sensor 306 can be used to track patient motion, such as respiration, during the procedure. This motion can be tracked using the position sensor 306. This patient motion can then be compensated for during resection.
In the illustrated example, a first medical instrument 504 is guided through the patient's mouth, esophagus 532, stomach 534, and duodenum 536 to the papilla 538. The papilla 538 can be identified visually, for example, using an optical system on the first medical instrument 504. The first medical instrument 504 includes a position sensor 506 as described above. A target location 508 in the pancreas can be determined relative to the position determined by the position sensor 506. This can be done because the physician knows that the pancreas is located opposite the papilla 538. Thus, the target location 508 can be determined at a position that is distanced from the position sensor 506. The target location 508 can then used as a beacon for aligning and guiding percutaneous insertion of a second medical instrument 514 as described above. For example, an axis 518 of the second medical instrument can be aligned with the target location 508, and then the second medical instrument can be percutaneously inserted through an opening 520 so as to intersect with the target location 508 and take the biopsy. As before, alignment of second medical instrument 514 can be robotically maintained.
Next, the method 600 moves to block 604, at which a first position of the first medical instrument is determined using a first position sensor on the first medical instrument. The first medical instrument can include a first position sensor. The first position sensor can be an EM sensor, shape sensing fiber, or any other type of sensor for determining position. In some embodiments, the output of the first position sensor can be registered to a preoperative model, such that the position of the first position sensor is determined with reference to the preoperative model. The preoperative model can be developed, for example, based on a CT scan or other methods as described above.
The method 600 then moves to block 606, at which a target location that is distanced from the first position is determined within the treatment region. The target location can represent a rendezvous point for a second medical instrument. The target location can be displayed to the user. In some embodiments, defining the target location within the treatment region comprises determining the target location with reference to the preoperative model. For example, determining the target location with reference to the preoperative model can be accomplished by displaying the preoperative model to a user, and receiving a selection of the target location with reference to the preoperative model.
In some embodiments, a distance and direction between the first position, as determined by the first position sensor, and the target location can be determined. The distance and direction can be calculated, for example, from the registered preoperative model.
In some embodiments, defining the target location within the treatment region can include capturing one or more intraoperative medical images of the treatment region, and defining the target location with reference to the one or more intraoperative medical images. the intraoperative medical images can be one or more fluoroscopic images. The one or more medical images can be registered to the output of the position sensor.
Finally, the method moves to block 608, at which a second medical instrument is guided toward the target location. The second medical instrument can be a laparoscope. In some embodiments, the second medical instrument is inserted into the treatment region percutaneously or through a percutaneous opening. The second medical instrument can be an endoscope. In some embodiments, the second medical instrument is inserted into the treatment region through a natural patient orifice. The second medical instrument can be robotically controlled, for example, using the robotically-enabled medical systems described above with reference to
In some embodiment, guiding the second medical instrument toward the target location can include aligning a second axis of the second medical instrument with the target location, and advancing the second medical instrument toward the target location. In some embodiments, the second medical instrument is attached to a robotic arm, or other instrument positioning device. The robotic arm can restrict motion of the second medical instrument to motion along or around the second axis to maintain alignment with the target location. The robotic arm may provide haptic boundaries that maintain alignment of the second medical instrument.
In some embodiments, the method 600 further comprises determining patient movement with the first position sensor of the first medical instrument. For example, during a procedure, the first medical instrument can remain in the treatment region and the first position sensor can monitor patient movement. In some embodiment, guidance of the second instrument can compensate for the measured patient movement. Patient movement that can be compensated for can include, for example, movement due to respiration.
Next, the method 610 moves to block 614, at which the first position sensor is registered to a preoperative model. The first medical instrument can include a first position sensor. The first position sensor can be an EM sensor, shape sensing fiber, or any other type of sensor for determining position. In some embodiments, the output of the first position sensor can be registered to a preoperative model, such that the position of the first position sensor is determined with reference to the preoperative model. The preoperative model can be developed, for example, based on a CT scan or other methods as described above.
The method 610 then moves to block 616, at which positions for one or more virtual fiducials are defined to create a boundary with reference to the preoperative model. In some embodiments, determining the positions for the one or more virtual fiducials includes navigating the first medical instrument to a location within the treatment region at which a virtual fiducial will be placed, and defining the location as the position of a virtual fiducial based on the registered output of the first position sensor. In some embodiments, determining the positions for the one or more virtual fiducials includes receiving a user selection of a location at which to place one of the one more virtual fiducials, and determining a virtual fiducial position corresponding to the location with reference to at least a first position determined based on the first position sensor, wherein the virtual fiducial position is distanced from the first position. In some embodiments, a virtual curve or surface is fit to the virtual fiducials to define the boundary. The boundary and/or virtual fiducials can be displayed to the physician.
Next, the method 610 moves to block 618, at which the first medical instrument is positioned away from the boundary. In some embodiments, in this position, patient movement during the procedure can be monitored with the first position sensor of the first medical instrument, as described above. In some embodiments, block 618 can be omitted, and the first medical instrument can remain at the boundary during the procedure. Whether the first instrument remains at the boundary can depend, for example, on the usage of the boundary and timing. For instance, in
Finally, the method 600 moves to block 620, at which a second medical instrument is guided within the treatment region based on the one or more virtual fiducials. The second medical instrument can be a laparoscope. In some embodiments, the second medical instrument is inserted into the treatment region percutaneously or through a percutaneous opening. The second medical instrument can be an endoscope. In some embodiments, the second medical instrument is inserted into the treatment region through a natural patient orifice. The second medical instrument can be robotically controlled, for example, using the robotically-enabled medical systems described above with reference to
In some embodiments, the methods 600, 610 can be performed, for example, using the robotically-enabled medical systems described above with reference to
The concomitant endoscopic and percutaneous (e.g., laparoscopic) systems and methods described above can provide numerous advantages, including providing improved placement precision for endoscopic or laparoscopic tools and providing well defined or otherwise improved resection boundaries.
The concomitant endoscopic and percutaneous (e.g., laparoscopic) systems and methods described above can also be used during combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS), which can be performed robotically using the systems described above. An example of a procedures that can be advantageously performed using CELS is colonic polyp resection, although other examples also exist. Polyps can be evaluated as to whether they can be removed endoscopically based on their size, type, and location. When polyps cannot be removed endoscopically, they can be removed via segmental colectomy, which is accompanied with a comparatively high complication rate and increased recovery time. During poly resection, CELS can enable extraluminal mobilization of the colon (with laparoscopic instruments) to make the polyp easier to resect intraluminally (with endoscopic instruments).
When performed manually, CELS typically requires at least two physicians (to control the laparoscopic and endoscopic instruments respectively) and two assistants (to hold the laparoscope and colonoscope respectively). While one physician is moving an instrument, the remaining providers may hold their instruments still, which may be physically demanding over extended periods of time. There may be additional staff members in the room to assist with instrument exchange, pass suture or gauze, handle specimens after removal, and control laparoscopic instruments, etc. Further, communication between the two operating physicians can be slow and difficult. For example, it may be difficult to for one physician to communicate the location of the instrument that he or she is controlling to the other physician or vice versa. The systems and methods described above may reduce or eliminate these difficulties that can occur when CELS is performed manually by allowing a single physician to control both instruments and/or providing improved rendezvous between the two instruments.
In addition to the above example of endoscopic diagnosis and surgical resection of a cancerous tumor, other example medical procedures may benefit from the systems and methods described herein, including bronchoscopic localization of lung cancer with simultaneous thoracoscopic resection, endoscopic localization of gastrointestinal cancer with laparoscopic resection, endoscopic localization and resection of gastrointestinal cancer with laparoscopic assistance, endoscopic imaging or visualization for gastrointestinal reconstructive procedures, such as gastrectomy, roux-en-y-gastric bypass, etc., ureteroscopic stone/tumor localization and percutaneous removal/resection. In some embodiments, such procedures can be performed in a single treatment episode. In some embodiments, such procedures can be performed with a minimal number of clinicians, and in some cases, a single physician. Furthermore, in some embodiments, simultaneous procedures can be performed using a single type of console to control the simultaneous procedures.
In some instances, one instrument (e.g., an endoscopically inserted instrument) may be able to provide better visualization of a treatment site (e.g., a lesion) while another instrument (e.g., a laparoscopically inserted instrument) may be better suited to treat (e.g., biopsy or resect) the treatment site. The reverse may also be true. In some cases, the laparoscopically inserted instrument can provide better visualization, while the endoscopically inserted instrument can provide better treatment. The methods and systems described above can advantageously allow each instrument to be used in the manner that is better suited for, while relaying information that can be used to guide the other instrument. This can advantageously allow greater precision and reduce total time for the procedure, providing improved patient outcomes.
3. Implementing Systems and Terminology.
Implementations disclosed herein provide systems, methods and apparatus for endoscopically-assisted percutaneous medical procedures.
It should be noted that the terms “couple,” “coupling,” “coupled” or other variations of the word couple as used herein may indicate either an indirect connection or a direct connection. For example, if a first component is “coupled” to a second component, the first component may be either indirectly connected to the second component via another component or directly connected to the second component.
The phrases referencing specific computer-implemented processes and functions described herein may be stored as one or more instructions on a processor-readable or computer-readable medium. The term “computer-readable medium” refers to any available medium that can be accessed by a computer or processor. By way of example, and not limitation, such a medium may comprise random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory, compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM) or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer. It should be noted that a computer-readable medium may be tangible and non-transitory. As used herein, the term “code” may refer to software, instructions, code or data that is/are executable by a computing device or processor.
The methods disclosed herein comprise one or more steps or actions for achieving the described method. The method steps and/or actions may be interchanged with one another without departing from the scope of the claims. In other words, unless a specific order of steps or actions is required for proper operation of the method that is being described, the order and/or use of specific steps and/or actions may be modified without departing from the scope of the claims.
As used herein, the term “plurality” denotes two or more. For example, a plurality of components indicates two or more components. The term “determining” encompasses a wide variety of actions and, therefore, “determining” can include calculating, computing, processing, deriving, investigating, looking up (e.g., looking up in a table, a database or another data structure), ascertaining and the like. Also, “determining” can include receiving (e.g., receiving information), accessing (e.g., accessing data in a memory) and the like. Also, “determining” can include resolving, selecting, choosing, establishing and the like.
The phrase “based on” does not mean “based only on,” unless expressly specified otherwise. In other words, the phrase “based on” describes both “based only on” and “based at least on.”
The previous description of the disclosed implementations is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these implementations will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other implementations without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, it will be appreciated that one of ordinary skill in the art will be able to employ a number corresponding alternative and equivalent structural details, such as equivalent ways of fastening, mounting, coupling, or engaging tool components, equivalent mechanisms for producing particular actuation motions, and equivalent mechanisms for delivering electrical energy. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the implementations shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/738,706, filed Sep. 28, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference. Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4644237 | Frushour et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4745908 | Wardle | May 1988 | A |
4748969 | Wardle | Jun 1988 | A |
D307263 | Ishida | Apr 1990 | S |
5190557 | Borodulin et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194791 | Cull | Mar 1993 | A |
5199417 | Muller et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5251611 | Zehel et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5273025 | Sakiyam et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5280781 | Oku | Jan 1994 | A |
5408263 | Kikuchi | Apr 1995 | A |
5526812 | Dumoulin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550953 | Seraji | Aug 1996 | A |
5669876 | Schechter et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672877 | Liebig et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart | Jun 1998 | A |
5831614 | Tognazzini et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899851 | Koninckx | May 1999 | A |
5935075 | Casscells | Aug 1999 | A |
6004016 | Spector | Dec 1999 | A |
6038467 | De Bliek et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047080 | Chen | Apr 2000 | A |
6059718 | Taniguchi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063095 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6167292 | Badano | Dec 2000 | A |
6198974 | Webster, Jr. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203493 | Ben-Haim | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246784 | Summers | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246898 | Vesely | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6332089 | Acker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6425865 | Salcudean et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466198 | Feinstein | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490467 | Bucholz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6553251 | Lahdesmaki | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6665554 | Charles | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671538 | Ehnholm et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690963 | Ben-Haim | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690964 | Beiger et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6755797 | Stouffer | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6812842 | Dimmer | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837846 | Jaffe | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6899672 | Chin | May 2005 | B2 |
6926709 | Beiger et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7180976 | Wink | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197354 | Sobe | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206627 | Abovitz | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7233820 | Gilboa | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7386339 | Strommer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7607440 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7756563 | Higgins | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763015 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772541 | Froggatt et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7850642 | Moll et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7901348 | Soper | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7963288 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8021326 | Moll et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8155403 | Tschirren | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190238 | Moll et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8298135 | Ito et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8317746 | Sewell et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8335557 | Maschke | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348931 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8376934 | Takahashi | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394054 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8396595 | Dariush | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8442618 | Strommer et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460236 | Roelle et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469945 | Schena | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8498691 | Moll et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506555 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8554368 | Fielding et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573228 | Kalpin | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8652030 | Matsuura et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8720448 | Reis et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8738181 | Greer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8821376 | Tolkowsky | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8827948 | Romo et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858424 | Hasegawa | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8894610 | MacNamara et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8929631 | Pfister et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945095 | Blumenkranz | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9014851 | Wong et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9023060 | Cooper et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9084623 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9125639 | Mathis | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129417 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138129 | Diolaiti | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9173713 | Hart et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183354 | Baker et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9186046 | Ramamurthy et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9199372 | Henderson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226796 | Bowling | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9256940 | Carelsen et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9259274 | Prisco | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9272416 | Hourtash et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289578 | Walker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9302702 | Schepmann | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9314306 | Yu | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9345456 | Tsonton et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358682 | Ruiz Morales | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9452276 | Duindam et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9459087 | Dunbar | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9504604 | Alvarez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9522034 | Johnson | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9561083 | Yu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9603668 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9622827 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629595 | Walker et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629682 | Wallace et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636184 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9668768 | Piron et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9675422 | Hourtash et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9710921 | Wong et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9713509 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9717563 | Tognaccini | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9726476 | Ramamurthy et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9727963 | Mintz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737371 | Romo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737373 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744335 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9782229 | Crawford | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9788910 | Schuh | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9789608 | Itkowitz et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9839481 | Blumenkranz et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9844353 | Walker et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9844412 | Bogusky et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9867635 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9918681 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9931025 | Graetzel et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9949749 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955986 | Shah | May 2018 | B2 |
9962228 | Schuh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980785 | Schuh | May 2018 | B2 |
9993313 | Schuh et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10016900 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10022192 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10046140 | Kokish et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10080576 | Romo et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10123755 | Walker et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10130345 | Wong et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10136950 | Schoenefeld | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10136959 | Mintz et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10143360 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10143526 | Walker et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10145747 | Lin et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10149720 | Romo | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10159532 | Ummalaneni et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10159533 | Moll et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10169875 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10213264 | Tanner et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10219874 | Yu et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10231793 | Romo | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10231867 | Alvarez et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10244926 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10278778 | State | May 2019 | B2 |
10285574 | Landey et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10299870 | Connolly et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10314463 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10383765 | Alvarez et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10398518 | Yu et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10405939 | Romo et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10405940 | Romo | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10426559 | Graetzel et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10426661 | Kintz | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10434660 | Meyer | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10454347 | Covington et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10492741 | Walker et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10464209 | Ho et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10470830 | Hill | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10482599 | Mintz et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10493241 | Jiang | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10500001 | Yu et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10517692 | Eyre et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10524866 | Srinivasan | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10531864 | Wong et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10539478 | Lin | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10543048 | Noonan et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10548666 | Girotto et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10555778 | Ummalaneni et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10583271 | Bogusky | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10631949 | Schuh et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10639109 | Bovay et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10646291 | Turner | May 2020 | B2 |
11135023 | Larkin et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11172895 | Dickhans et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11602372 | Plewe et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11660147 | Ayvali et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
20010000040 | Adams et al. | Mar 2001 | A1 |
20010021843 | Bosselmann et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010039421 | Heilbrun | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020035330 | Cline | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065455 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077533 | Bieger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082612 | Moll et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120188 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128535 | Kikuchi | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161280 | Chatenever et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173878 | Watanabe | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030045778 | Ohline | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030105603 | Hardesty | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125622 | Schweikard | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181809 | Hall et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182091 | Kukuk | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195664 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040015079 | Berger et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040047044 | Dalton | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072066 | Cho et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040152970 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176751 | Weitzner et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186349 | Ewers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040249267 | Gilboa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257021 | Chang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263535 | Birkenbach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027397 | Niemeyer | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043718 | Madhani | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060006 | Pflueger | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065400 | Banik | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085714 | Foley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107679 | Geiger | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107917 | Smith et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143649 | Minai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143655 | Satoh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182295 | Soper et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193451 | Quistgaard et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222554 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234293 | Yamamoto | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256398 | Hastings | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261551 | Couvillon | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272975 | McWeeney et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004286 | Chang | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015096 | Hauck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025668 | Peterson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041293 | Mehdizadeh | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058617 | Sano et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058643 | Florent | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079745 | Viswanathan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084860 | Geiger | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095066 | Chang | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098851 | Shoham | May 2006 | A1 |
20060149134 | Soper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173290 | Lavallee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178556 | Hasser et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184016 | Glossop | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200026 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200049 | Leo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209019 | Hu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060258935 | Pile-Spellman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258938 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287769 | Yanagita et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013336 | Nowlin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032826 | Schwartz | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043455 | Viswanathan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055128 | Glossop | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055144 | Neustadter | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073136 | Metzger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083193 | Werneth | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123748 | Meglan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135886 | Maschke | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142971 | Schena | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150155 | Kawai | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161857 | Durant et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167743 | Honda | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167801 | Webler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185377 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208252 | Makower | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232856 | Ueno | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070232882 | Glossop et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249911 | Simon | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253599 | White et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269001 | Maschke | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287992 | Diolaiti | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293721 | Gilboa | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299353 | Harlev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080027313 | Shachar | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071140 | Gattani | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079421 | Jensen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103389 | Begelman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108870 | Wiita et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118118 | Berger | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118135 | Averbach | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123921 | Gielen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140087 | Barbagli et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147089 | Loh | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159653 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161681 | Hauck | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183064 | Chandonnet | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183068 | Carls et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183073 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183188 | Carls et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201016 | Finlay | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207997 | Higgins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212082 | Froggatt et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218770 | Moll et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231221 | Ogawa | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243142 | Gildenberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249640 | Vittor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255505 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262297 | Gilboa | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275349 | Halperin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287963 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306490 | Lakin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312501 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312771 | Sugiura | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005768 | Sharareh | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030307 | Govari | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048611 | Funda | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054729 | Mori | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062611 | Toyama | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062813 | Prisco | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076476 | Barbagli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076534 | Shelton | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082782 | Kalpin | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090149867 | Glozman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090184825 | Anderson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198298 | Kaiser et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221908 | Glossop | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090227861 | Ganatra | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228020 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245600 | Hoffman | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248036 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256905 | Tashiro | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259099 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259230 | Khadem | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262109 | Markowitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287354 | Choi | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292166 | Ito | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295797 | Sakaguchi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324161 | Prisco | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326318 | Tognaccini | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008555 | Trumer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030061 | Canfield | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030115 | Fujimoto | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039506 | Sarvestani et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041949 | Tolkowsky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054536 | Huang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069920 | Naylor et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076263 | Tanaka | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076305 | Maier-Hein et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082041 | Prisco | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100045 | Pravongviengkham et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113852 | Sydora | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121138 | Goldenberg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121139 | OuYang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137882 | Quaid, III | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160733 | Gilboa | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161022 | Tolkowsky | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161129 | Costa et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168918 | Zhao | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198170 | Umeda et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204713 | Ruiz | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225209 | Goldberg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228266 | Hourtash | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234856 | Stoianovici et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234857 | Itkowitz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100240989 | Stoianovici | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256812 | Tsusaka et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274087 | Diolaiti et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100290530 | Huang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292565 | Meyer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298641 | Tanaka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298704 | Pelissier et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100328455 | Nam et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009880 | Prisco | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015484 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021926 | Spencer | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054303 | Barrick | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060214 | Makower | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082366 | Scully et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110082462 | Suarez | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092808 | Shachar | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137122 | Kawai | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153252 | Govari | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160570 | Kariv | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184238 | Higgins | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196199 | Donhowe et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218676 | Okazaki | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234780 | Ito | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238082 | Wenderow | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245665 | Nentwick | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110248987 | Mitchell | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249016 | Zhang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257480 | Takahashi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258842 | Dukesherer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270084 | Choi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276179 | Banks et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277775 | Holop et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282188 | Burnside et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110319910 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000427 | Nilsson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046521 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046522 | Naito | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056986 | Popovic | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059249 | Verard et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062714 | Liu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065481 | Hunter | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069167 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071752 | Sewell | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071782 | Patil et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071822 | Romo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071894 | Tanner et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120082351 | Higgins | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120120305 | Takahashi | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123441 | Au | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130217 | Kauphusman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143268 | Burroughs | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165656 | Montag | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191079 | Moll et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209069 | Popovic | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209293 | Carlson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215094 | Rahimian et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120219185 | Hu | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221007 | Batten et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239060 | Orban, III | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253200 | Stolka | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120253276 | Govari et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283745 | Goldberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120283747 | Popovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289777 | Chopra | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289783 | Duindam et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302869 | Koyrakh | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120328077 | Bouvier | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130018306 | Ludwin | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130060146 | Yang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085330 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090530 | Ramamurthy | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102846 | Sjostrom | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130123580 | Peters | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131503 | Schneider et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144116 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165854 | Sandhu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165945 | Roelle | Jun 2013 | A9 |
20130172905 | Iorgulescu | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130197357 | Green | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204124 | Duindam | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130209208 | Bailey | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218005 | Desai | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225942 | Holsing | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130243153 | Sra | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246334 | Ahuja | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130259315 | Angot et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274783 | Wynberg | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303891 | Chopra | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130303892 | Zhao | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325030 | Hourtash et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345718 | Crawford | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001235 | Shelton, IV | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140051049 | Jarc | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058406 | Tsekos | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140107390 | Brown | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114180 | Jain | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140148808 | Inkpen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135985 | Coste-Maniere et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163664 | Goldsmith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180063 | Zhao | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140222207 | Bowling et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140235943 | Paris | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243801 | Fanelli et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243849 | Saglam | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257333 | Blumenkranz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257746 | Dunbar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264081 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275988 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276033 | Brannan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276937 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277333 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296655 | Akhbardeh et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296657 | Izmirli | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296870 | Stern et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309527 | Namati et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309625 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316420 | Ballard et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140343416 | Panescu | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140343569 | Turner | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350391 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140357984 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364739 | Liu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364870 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150025549 | Kilroy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150045675 | Chernomorsky | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051482 | Liu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150054929 | Ito et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057498 | Akimoto | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150073266 | Brannan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150073267 | Brannan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088161 | Hata | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150104284 | Riedel | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119628 | Bharat et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119645 | Baldwin | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150141808 | Elhawary | May 2015 | A1 |
20150141858 | Razavi | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142013 | Tanner et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150150635 | Kilroy | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150150636 | Hagn et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150202015 | Elhawary | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150209056 | Shoham et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223725 | Engel | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223832 | Swaney | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223897 | Kostrzewski et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223902 | Walker et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150255782 | Kim et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265087 | Park | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265359 | Camarillo | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265368 | Chopra | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265807 | Park et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150275986 | Cooper | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150287192 | Sasaki | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150297133 | Jouanique-Dubuis et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150297299 | Yeung | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150305650 | Hunter | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150311838 | Moule | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150313503 | Seibel et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150342695 | He | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150359597 | Gombert et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160000302 | Brown | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160000414 | Brown | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160000495 | Elliott | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160000520 | Lachmanovich | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160001038 | Romo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005168 | Merlet | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005220 | Weingarten | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005576 | Tsukamoto | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160008033 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160016319 | Remirez | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160045269 | Elhawary et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160051221 | Dickhans et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160066794 | Klinder et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160073928 | Soper | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160075030 | Takahashi | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081568 | Kolberg | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160100772 | Ikuma | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160111192 | Suzara | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160128781 | Blohm et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160128992 | Hudson | May 2016 | A1 |
20160166320 | Ciulla | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183841 | Duindam et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199134 | Brown et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160206389 | Miller | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213432 | Flexman | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160228032 | Walker et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160270865 | Landey et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160278865 | Capote | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287053 | Miura | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287111 | Jacobsen | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287279 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287346 | Hyodo et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160314710 | Jarc | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160317225 | Girotto et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160331469 | Hall et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338787 | Popovic | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160346038 | Helgeson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160346924 | Hasegawa | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160354057 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160354152 | Beck | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160360947 | Lida | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160360949 | Hyodo | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160372743 | Cho et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007337 | Dan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170023423 | Jackson | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170055851 | Al-Ali | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170056215 | Nagesh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170065351 | Case et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170068796 | Passerini et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170071456 | Ratnakar | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079725 | Hoffman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079726 | Hoffman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170095299 | Hendrick | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170100197 | Zubiate | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170106904 | Hanson | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170119412 | Noonan | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119481 | Romo et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170135710 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170135718 | Lyons | May 2017 | A1 |
20170135833 | Syed | May 2017 | A1 |
20170143442 | Tesar | May 2017 | A1 |
20170165503 | Hautvast et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170181809 | Panescu | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170209162 | Sperry | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170189118 | Chopra | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170189131 | Weir | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170202627 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170209073 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170215808 | Shimol et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170215969 | Zhai et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170231647 | Saunders | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170238807 | Veritkov et al. | Aug 2017 | A9 |
20170245854 | Zemlok | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170245885 | Lenker | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170251951 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170251988 | Weber et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170258366 | Tupin | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280978 | Yamamoto | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170281049 | Yamamoto | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170290631 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170296032 | Li | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170296202 | Brown | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303889 | Grim | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303941 | Eisner | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170304015 | Tavallaei et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170325715 | Mehendale et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170325896 | Donhowe | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170326337 | Romascanu | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340241 | Yamada | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340396 | Romo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170348067 | Krimsky | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170360508 | Germain et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180025666 | Ho et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180055576 | Koyrakh | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180055582 | Krimsky | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180064498 | Kapadia | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180098690 | Iwaki | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180098817 | Nichogi et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180169671 | Winter | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180193102 | Inoue | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180200015 | Ng et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180214011 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180217734 | Koenig et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221038 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221039 | Shah | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180235709 | Donhowe et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180240237 | Donhowe et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250083 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180250085 | Simi | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180271604 | Grout et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180271616 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180279852 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180280660 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180286108 | Hirakawa | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289394 | Shah | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289431 | Draper et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180308247 | Gupta | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180325499 | Landey et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180325608 | Kang | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180333044 | Jenkins | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180338799 | Hladio et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180360435 | Romo | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180368920 | Ummalaneni | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190000559 | Berman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190000560 | Berman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190000576 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190046814 | Senden et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066314 | Abhari | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190083178 | Mata et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190083183 | Moll et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190086349 | Nelson | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190110839 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190151148 | Alvarez et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190125164 | Roelle et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190167366 | Ummalaneni | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190167367 | Walker et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190175009 | Mintz | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190175062 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190175799 | Hsu | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190183585 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190183587 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190201105 | Shelton, IV | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190209252 | Walker et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216548 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216576 | Eyre | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190223958 | Kohli et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190223974 | Romo | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228525 | Mintz et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190246882 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190262086 | Connolly et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190269468 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190274764 | Romo | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190287673 | Michihata | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290109 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190298160 | Ummalaneni et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190298460 | Al-Jadda | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190298465 | Chin | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190328213 | Landey et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190336238 | Yu | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190365199 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365201 | Noonan et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365209 | Ye et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365479 | Rafii-Tari | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365486 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190374297 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190375383 | Alvarez | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190380787 | Ye | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190380797 | Yu | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200000530 | DeFonzo | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200000533 | Schuh | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200008874 | Barbagli et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200022767 | Hill | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200038123 | Graetzel | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200039086 | Meyer | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200046434 | Graetzel | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200054405 | Schuh | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200054408 | Schuh et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200060516 | Baez | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200078103 | Duindam | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200085516 | DeFonzo | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200093549 | Chin | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200093554 | Schuh | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200100845 | Julian | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200100853 | Ho | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200100855 | Leparmentier et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200101264 | Jiang | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200107894 | Wallace | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200121502 | Kintz | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200146769 | Eyre | May 2020 | A1 |
20200155084 | Walker | May 2020 | A1 |
20200170630 | Wong | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200170720 | Ummalaneni | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200171660 | Ho | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200188043 | Yu | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200197112 | Chin | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200206472 | Ma | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200217733 | Lin | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200222134 | Schuh | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200237458 | DeFonzo | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200246591 | Bogusky | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200261172 | Romo | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200268459 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200268460 | Tse | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200281787 | Ruiz | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200297437 | Schuh | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200305922 | Schuh | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200305983 | Yampolsky | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200305989 | Schuh | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200315717 | Bovay | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200315723 | Hassan | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200323596 | Moll | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200330167 | Romo | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210196312 | Plewe et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210196399 | Ayvali et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1364275 | Aug 2002 | CN |
1511249 | Jul 2004 | CN |
1846181 | Oct 2006 | CN |
1857877 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101147676 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101147676 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101222882 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101325920 | Dec 2008 | CN |
102316817 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102316817 | Jan 2012 | CN |
101325920 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102341057 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102341057 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102458295 | May 2012 | CN |
102711586 | Oct 2012 | CN |
101222882 | Mar 2013 | CN |
102973317 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103565529 | Feb 2014 | CN |
103705307 | Apr 2014 | CN |
103735313 | Apr 2014 | CN |
103767659 | May 2014 | CN |
103813748 | May 2014 | CN |
103930063 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104684502 | Jun 2015 | CN |
104758066 | Jul 2015 | CN |
105030331 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105559850 | May 2016 | CN |
105559886 | May 2016 | CN |
105611881 | May 2016 | CN |
106821498 | Jun 2017 | CN |
107028659 | Aug 2017 | CN |
108348139 | Jul 2018 | CN |
104931059 | Sep 2018 | CN |
109069136 | Dec 2018 | CN |
102013100605 | Jul 2014 | DE |
0 347 098 | Feb 1996 | EP |
1 250 986 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 566 150 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 800 593 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2 158 834 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2 392 435 | Dec 2011 | EP |
3 025 630 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2 615 992 | Jul 2016 | EP |
3367915 | Sep 2018 | EP |
2008-528130 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008538184 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009-509654 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-524530 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2011-088260 | May 2011 | JP |
2012502686 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2013-510662 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2013510662 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2014512876 | May 2014 | JP |
2015527906 | Sep 2015 | JP |
2017094084 | Jun 2017 | JP |
2018524031 | Aug 2018 | JP |
6388686 | Sep 2018 | JP |
2019531809 | Nov 2019 | JP |
10-2014-0009359 | Jan 2014 | KR |
2569699 | Nov 2015 | RU |
0159643 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0156457 | Aug 2001 | WO |
02061371 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 04029782 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004114037 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 05087128 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006079108 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006124388 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 06122061 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007041094 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 09097461 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007114975 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 09120940 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010033306 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010133733 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 10127162 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 11002215 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011058893 | May 2011 | WO |
2011100110 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 11132409 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 12044334 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 12082719 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012109760 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2013039564 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013055707 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013071071 | May 2013 | WO |
2014005139 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014052428 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 14114551 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO 15089013 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 15142957 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016176549 | Nov 2016 | WO |
WO 17036774 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 17048194 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 17053698 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 17066108 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017075574 | May 2017 | WO |
2017118750 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO 17146890 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 17167754 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2018085287 | May 2018 | WO |
WO 18098477 | May 2018 | WO |
2019198061 | Oct 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Blankenstein, Jun. 2008, Dynamic Registration and High Speed Visual Servoing in Robot-Assisted Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. |
Ciuti et al., 2012, Intra-operative monocular 30 reconstruction for image-guided navigation in active locomotion capsule endoscopy. Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob), 4th IEEE Ras & Embs International Conference on IEEE. |
Darwiche, 2015, Operative technique and early experience for robotic assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (RALNU) using da Vinci XI, SpringerPlus, 4:298. |
Fallavollita et al., 2010, Acquiring multiview C-arm images to assist cardiac ablation procedures, EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, vol. 2010, Article ID 871408, pp. 1-10. |
Haigron et al., 2004, Depth-map-based scene analysis for active navigation in virtual angioscopy, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(11):1380-1390. |
Kiraly et al., 2002, Three-dimensional Human Airway Segmentation Methods for Clinical Virtual Bronchoscopy, Acad Radiol, 9:1153-1168. |
Kiraly et al., Sep. 2004, Three-dimensional path planning for virtual bronchoscopy, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(9):1365-1379. |
Konen et al., 1998, The VN-project: endoscopic image processing for neurosurgery, Computer Aided Surgery, 3:1-6. |
Kukuk, Oct. 5, 2001, TBNA-protocols: Guiding TransBronchial Needle Aspirations Without a Computer in the Operating Room, MICCAI 2001, 2208:997-1006. |
Kumar et al., 2014, Stereoscopic visualization of laparoscope image using depth information from 3D model, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 113(3):862-868. |
Lawton et al., 1999, Ribbons and groups: A thin rod theory for catheters and filaments, J. Phys. A., 1999, 32:1709-1735. |
Livatino et al., 2015, Stereoscopic visualization and 3-D technologies in medical endoscopic teleoperation, IEEE. |
Luo et al., 2010, Modified hybrid bronchoscope tracking based on sequential monte carlo sampler: Dynamic phantom validation, Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
Mayo Clinic, Robotic Surgery, https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/robotic-surgery/about/pac-20394974?p=1, downloaded from the internet on Jul. 12, 2018, 2 pp. |
Mourgues et al., 2002, Flexible calibration of actuated stereoscopic endoscope for overlay in robot assisted surgery, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
Nadeem et al., 2016, Depth Reconstruction and Computer-Aided Polyp Detection in Optical Colonoscopy Video Frames, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.01329. |
Point Cloud, Sep. 10, 2010, Wikipedia, 2 pp. |
Racadio et al., Dec. 2007, Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite, AJR, 189:W357-W364. |
Sasaki, 2017, Laparoscopic hemicolectomy for a patient with situs inversus totalis: a case report, Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 41:93-96. |
Sato et al., 2016, Techniques of stapler-based navigational thoracoscopic segmentectomy using virtual assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP), Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8(Suppl 9):S716. |
Shen et al., 2015, Robust camera localisation with depth reconstruction for bronchoscopic navigation. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 10(6):801-813. |
Shi et al., Sep. 14-18, 2014, Simultaneous catheter and environment modeling for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2024-2029. |
Solheim et al., May 14, 2009, Navigated resection of giant intracranial meningiomas based on intraoperative 3D ultrasound, Acta Neurochir, 151:1143-1151. |
Solomon et al., Dec. 2000, Three-dimensional CT- Guided Bronchoscopy With a Real-Time Electromagnetic Position Sensor A Comparison of Two Image Registration Methods, Chest, 118(6):1783-1787. |
Song et al., 2012, Autonomous and stable tracking of endoscope instrument tools with monocular camera, Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2012 IEEE-ASME International Conference on. IEEE. |
Vemuri et al., Dec. 2015, Inter-operative biopsy site relocations in endoluminal surgery, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, <10.1109/TBME.2015.2503981>. < hal-01230752>. |
International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 18, 2019 for PCT/US2019/53600. |
Al-Ahmad et al., dated 2005, Early experience with a computerized robotically controlled catheter system, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 12:199-202. |
Gutierrez et al., Mar. 2008, A practical global distortion correction method for an image intensifier based x-ray fluoroscopy system, Med. Phys, 35(3):997-1007. |
Hansen Medical, Inc. Bibliography, product brochure, 1 p., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/bibliography.aspx on Jul. 14, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
Hansen Medical, Inc. dated 2009, Sensei X Robotic Catheter System, product brochure, 5 pp. |
Hansen Medical, Inc. Technology Advantages, product brochure, 1 p., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/advantages.aspx on Jul. 13, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
Marrouche et al., dated May 6, 2005, AB32-1, Preliminary human experience using a novel robotic catheter remote control, Heart Rhythm, 2(5):S63. |
Oh et al., dated May 2005, P5-75, Novel robotic catheter remote control system: safety and accuracy in delivering RF Lesions in all 4 cardiac chambers, Heart Rhythm, 2(5):S277-S278. |
Reddy et al., May 2005, P1-53. Porcine pulmonary vein ablation using a novel robotic catheter control system and real-time integration of CT imaging with electroanatomical mapping, Hearth Rhythm, 2(5):S121. |
Slepian, dated 2010, Robotic Catheter Intervention: the Hansen Medical Sensei Robot Catheter System, PowerPoint presentation, 28 pp. |
Wilson et al., 2008, a buyer's guide to electromagnetic tracking systems for clinical applications, Proc. of SPCI, 6918:69182B-1 p. 6918B-11. |
Yip et al., 2012, Tissue tracking and registration for image-guided surgery, IEEE transactions on medical imaging 31(11):2169-2182. |
Zhou et al., 2010, Synthesis of stereoscopic views from monocular endoscopic videos, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on IEEE. |
Hansen Medical, Inc. 2005, System Overview, product brochure, 2 pp., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/system.aspx on Jul. 14, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
Hansen Medical, Inc. Bibliography, product brochure, 1 p., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/bibliography.aspx on Jul. 14, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive wav back machine). |
Hansen Medical, Inc. dated 2007, Introducing the Sensei Robotic Catheter System, product brochure, 10 pp. |
Hansen Medical, Inc. dated 2009, Sensei X Robotic Catheter System, product brochure, 5 pgs. |
Hansen Medical, Inc. Technology Advantages, product brochure, dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/advantages.aspx on Jul. 13, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine), 1 page. |
Verdaasdonk et al., Jan. 23, 2012, Effect of microsecond pulse length and tip shape on explosive bubble formation of 2.78 μm Er, Cr; YSGG and 2.94 μm Er:YAG laser, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8221. 12. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700 dated Apr. 5, 2021, 11 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2020/062360, dated Apr. 1, 2021, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/131,117, dated Feb. 1, 2022, 4 pages. |
Search Report for Appl. No. PCT/IB2020/062359, dated Jul. 8, 2021, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion for Appl. No. PCT/IB2020/062359, dated Apr. 1, 2021, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion for PCT/IB2020/062360, dated Apr. 1, 2021, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/131,117, dated Jan. 20, 2022, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700, dated Jul. 8, 2021, 5 pages. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700, dated Oct. 29, 2021, 5 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700, dated Apr. 5, 2021, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/131,117, dated Sep. 15, 2021, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700, dated Sep. 15, 2021, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Appl. No. PCT/IB2020/062359, dated Jul. 5, 2022, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Appl. No. PCT/IB2020/062360, dated Jul. 5, 2022, 4 pages. |
European Search Report for Appl. No. 19867337.8, dated May 27, 2022, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700, dated Feb. 18, 2022, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/131,117, dated May 11, 2022, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700, dated Jun. 16, 2022, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700, dated Jun. 3, 2022, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for Appl. No. 17/111,17, dated Sep. 28, 2022, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/130,700, dated Nov. 3, 2022, 5 pages. |
CN Office Action for Appl. No. 202080091047.7, dated Apr. 17, 2023, 8 pages. |
JP Office Action for Appl. No. 2021-517238, dated Aug. 10, 2023, 15 pages. |
CN Office Action for Appl. No. 202080091047.7, dated Nov. 20, 2023, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/131,117, dated Feb. 8, 2023, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/131,117, dated Jan. 31, 2023, 8 pages. |
Anonymous: “Software User Guide Rev. 1.0 Kolibri cranial/ENT Ver. 2.7”, Jan. 1, 2010 (Jan. 1, 2010), XP055859399, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://manulaslib.com/manual/1863481/Brainlab-Kolibri-Cranial.html [retrieved on Nov. 9, 2021]. |
CN Office Action for Appl. No. 201980063756.1, dated Dec. 13, 2023, 8 pages. |
CN Search Report for Appl. No. 201980063756.1, dated Dec. 1, 2023, 2 pages. |
EP Examination Report for Appl. No. 19867337.8, dated Jan. 31, 2024, 6 pages. |
EP Search Report for Appl. No. 20909386.3, dated Dec. 18, 2023, 8 pages. |
EP Search Report for Appl. No. 20910792.9, dated Dec. 11, 2023, 12 pages. |
JP Office Action for Appl. No. 2021-517238, dated Feb. 14, 2024, 17 pages. |
JP Office Action for Appl. No. 2022-540452, dated Jan. 26, 2024, 4 pages. |
AU Examination Report for Appl. No. 2019347754, dated May 9, 2024, 4 pages. |
CN 2nd Office Action for Appl. No. 201980063756.1, dated May 24, 2024, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200100855 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62738706 | Sep 2018 | US |