Patent Grant
11490782
The systems and methods disclosed herein are directed to endoluminal procedures, and, more particularly, to endoluminal navigation.
Bronchoscopy is a medical procedure that allows a physician to examine the inside conditions of a patient's lung airways, such as bronchi and bronchioles. During the medical procedure, a thin, flexible tubular tool, known as a bronchoscope, may be inserted into the patient's mouth and passed down the patient's throat into his/her lung airways towards a tissue site identified for subsequent diagnosis and treatment. The bronchoscope can have an interior lumen (a “working channel”) providing a pathway to the tissue site, and catheters and various medical tools can be inserted through the working channel to the tissue site.
Pulmonologists can prevent intra-operative trauma by basing their decisions and actions on the respiratory cycle of the patient. One example of such an action is insertion of a biopsy tool to collect tissue samples, for example via bronchoscopy. At or near the periphery of the lung the airways may be narrow, and the circumference of the airways changes depending on the respiratory phase of the lung. The diameter of an airway expands as a patient inhales in the inspiration phase of the respiratory cycles and constricts as the patient exhales during the expiration phase of the cycle. During a procedure, a pulmonologist can observe the patient to determine whether they are in the inspiration phase or the expiration phase in order to decide whether a particular tool or endoscope of fixed diameter can enter the airway. An airway can close around a tool during expiration without causing trauma, however forcing a tool through a constricted airway during the expiration phase can cause critical trauma, for example by puncturing a blood vessel.
The aforementioned problems, among others, are addressed in some embodiment by the luminal network navigation systems and techniques described herein. Some embodiments of the disclosed luminal network navigation systems and techniques relate to incorporating respiratory frequency and/or magnitude into a navigation framework to implement patient safety measures (e.g., instrument control techniques, user interface alerts, notifications, and the like). As an example of an instrument control technique, a robotic system as described herein can automatically implement respiratory gating to prevent the user (a physician) from inadvertently causing trauma to patient airways. As used herein, “respiratory gating” can refer to the synchronization of an operation of an instrument in the airways of a patient with patient respiration. In some examples, this instrument control technique includes identifying regions (“caution zones”) of patient airways in which instrument insertion during expiration is likely to cause trauma, for example smaller airways near the lung periphery where airway diameter during inhalation may approximate the instrument diameter. The robotic system can implement respiratory gating to control an instrument when the instrument is determined to be located within one of the identified regions. As an example of user interface alerts, the robotic system can present visual and/or auditory indicators of inspiration, expiration, and/or instrument positioning within an identified caution zone during a bronchoscopy procedure. A user can base instrument control on the user interface alerts, for example by manually performing respiratory gating or controlling the robotic system to perform respiratory gating.
Some embodiments of the disclosed bronchoscopy navigation systems and techniques relate to identifying, and compensating for, motion caused by patient respiration in order to provide a more accurate identification of the position of an instrument within patient airways. For example, an instrument positioned within patient airways can be provided with an electromagnetic (EM sensor). The navigation system can filter instrument position information from the EM sensor to remove signal noise due to cyclic motion of the respiratory passages caused by respiration. A frequency of the cyclic respiratory motion can be obtained from data from one or more additional sensors. In some implementations, inspiration and expiration cycles can be determined based on data from additional EM sensor(s), accelerometer(s), and/or acoustic respiratory sensor(s) placed on the body of the patient in one example. In some implementations, the frequency can be obtained from other types of sensors or systems, for example respiratory cycle information from a ventilator used to control patient breathing, or respiratory cycle information extracted from automated analysis of images received from an optical sensor positioned to observe the patient.
Accordingly, one aspect relates to a system configured to navigate a luminal network of a patient, the system comprising a field generator configured to generate an electromagnetic (EM) field; a set of one or more EM sensors at a distal end of a steerable instrument; a set of one or more respiration sensors; at least one computer-readable memory having stored thereon executable instructions; and one or more processors in communication with the at least one computer-readable memory and configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least access a preoperative model representative of the luminal network; access a mapping between a coordinate frame of the EM field and a coordinate frame of the preoperative model; calculate at least one position of the set of EM sensors within the EM field based on a data signal from the set of EM sensors; calculate a frequency of respiration of the patient based on a data signal from the set of respiration sensors; and determine a position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model based on the registration mapping, the frequency of the respiration, and the at least one position of the set of EM sensors within the EM field.
In some implementations, each EM sensor of the set of EM sensors is configured to produce a signal indicative of a distance and angle between the EM sensor and the field generator, the electrical signal usable to determine one or both of a position and orientation of the EM sensor within the EM field.
In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least transform one or more data signals from the set of respiration sensors into a frequency domain representation of the one or more data signals; and identify the frequency of respiration from the frequency domain representation of the one or more data signals. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least apply a filter to one or more data signals from the set of EM sensors, the filter configured to attenuate a portion of the one or more data signals with the identified frequency; and determine the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model based on the filtered one or more data signals from the set of EM sensors.
In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least calculate at least one magnitude of displacement of the set of respiration sensors between inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration of the patient. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to at least determine at least one position of the set of EM sensors relative to the set of respiration sensors; calculate at least one positional displacement of the set of EM sensors between the inspiration and the expiration phases based on (i) the determined at least one position of the set of EM sensors relative to the set of respiration sensors and (ii) the at least one magnitude of displacement of the set of respiration sensors between inspiration and expiration phases; and determine the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model based on the calculated at least one positional displacement of the set of EM sensors between the inspiration and the expiration phases. In some implementations, the set of respiration sensors comprises a first additional EM sensor positioned, in use, at a first position on the body surface and a second additional EM sensor positioned, in use, at a second position of the body surface, wherein the second position is spaced apart from the first position such that a first magnitude of displacement of the first additional EM sensor is greater than a second magnitude of displacement of the second additional EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least determine a relative positioning of the set of EM sensors with respect to the first and second additional EM sensors; and interpolate between the first and second magnitudes of displacement based on the determined relative positioning of the set of EM sensors, wherein the calculation of the positional displacement of the set of EM sensors between the inspiration and the expiration phases is based on the interpolated magnitude. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions cause the system to at least estimate a movement vector for at least a portion of the preoperative model based on the calculated at least one magnitude of displacement; translate the preoperative model within the coordinate frame of the EM field based on the estimated movement vector; and determine the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument based on the translated preoperative model. In some implementations, to translate the preoperative model within the coordinate frame of the EM field, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions cause the system to at least move a first portion of the model to first new coordinates based on the first magnitude of displacement; and move a second portion of the model to second new coordinates based on the second magnitude of displacement.
Some implementations further comprise a robotic system having instrument drivers configured to effect movement of the steerable instrument. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least identify a next movement of the steerable instrument based on the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model; and direct actuation of the instrument drivers to effect the next movement. Some implementations further comprise a display, wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least generate a graphical representation of the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model; and render the generated graphical representation on the display. In some implementations, the robotic system comprises an input device configured to control movement of the steerable instrument based on user manipulation of the input device.
In some implementations, the preoperative model comprises a three-dimensional computed tomography model of the luminal network of the patient.
Another aspect relates to an apparatus configured to determine navigation of a luminal network of a patient, the apparatus comprising at least one computer-readable memory having stored thereon executable instructions; and one or more processors in communication with the at least one computer-readable memory and configured to execute the instructions to cause the apparatus to at least access a model representative of the luminal network; access a mapping between a coordinate frame of the model and a coordinate frame of an electromagnetic (EM) field generated around the luminal network; receive data from an EM sensor on a distal end of a steerable instrument inserted, in use, into the luminal network; calculate, based on data from the EM sensor, a position of the EM sensor within the EM field based on data from the EM sensor; receive data from at least one additional sensor configured to detect movement of the luminal network; calculate, based on data from the at least one additional sensor, a frequency of cyclic movement of the luminal network; and determine a position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the model based on the mapping, the frequency, and the position of the EM sensor within the EM field.
In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises one or more EM sensors.
In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises an accelerometer.
In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises an acoustic respiratory sensor, and the acoustic respiratory sensor detects the cyclic movement during patient respiration.
In some implementations, the luminal network comprises respiratory airways, wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the apparatus to guide the steerable instrument through the luminal network.
In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least transform one or more data signals from the at least one additional sensor into a frequency domain representation of the one or more data signals; and identify the frequency of cyclic movement from the frequency domain representation of the one or more data signals. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least apply a filter to one or more data signals from the EM sensor, the filter configured to attenuate a portion of the one or more data signals with the identified frequency; and determine the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the model based on the filtered one or more data signals from the EM sensor.
In some implementations, the luminal network comprises respiratory airways, and the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least calculate at least one magnitude of displacement of the at least one additional sensor between inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration of the patient. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to at least determine a position of the EM sensor relative to the at least one additional sensor; calculate a positional displacement of the EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases based on (i) the determined position of the EM sensor relative to the at least one additional sensor and (ii) the at least one magnitude of displacement of the at least one additional sensor between inspiration and expiration phases; and determine the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model based on the calculated positional displacement of EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases. In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises a first additional EM sensor positioned, in use, at a first position on the body surface and a second additional EM sensor positioned, in use, at a second position of the body surface, wherein the second position is spaced apart from the first position such that a first magnitude of displacement of the first additional EM sensor is greater than a second magnitude of displacement of the second additional EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least determine a position of the EM sensor relative to the first and second additional EM sensors; and interpolate between the first and second magnitudes of displacement based on the determined position of the EM sensor relative to the first and second additional EM sensors, wherein the calculation of the positional displacement of the EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases is based on the interpolated magnitude. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions cause the system to at least estimate a movement vector for at least a portion of the model based on the calculated at least one magnitude of displacement; translate the model within the coordinate frame of the EM field based on the estimated movement vector; and determine the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument based on the translated model. In some implementations, to translate the preoperative model within the coordinate frame of the EM field, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions cause the system to at least move a first portion of the model to first new coordinates based on the first magnitude of displacement; and move a second portion of the model to second new coordinates based on the second magnitude of displacement.
Another aspect relates to a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions that, when executed, cause at least one computing device to at least receive first data from an electromagnetic (EM) sensor on an instrument inserted, in use, in a tissue site of a patient and second data from at least one additional sensor configured to detect movement of the tissue site; calculate, based on the first data, a position of the EM sensor within an EM field disposed around the tissue site; calculate, based on second data, a frequency of cyclic movement of the tissue site; and determine a position of the instrument relative to the tissue site based on (i) the frequency of cyclic movement of the tissue site and (ii) the position of the EM sensor within the field.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one computing device to transform the second data into a frequency domain representation; and identify the frequency of the cyclic movement from the frequency domain representation. In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one computing device to apply a filter to the first data, the filter configured to attenuate a portion of the first data with the identified frequency; and determine the position of the instrument based on the filtered first data.
In some implementations, the tissue site comprises respiratory airways, and the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one computing device to calculate at least one magnitude of displacement of the at least one additional sensor between inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration of the patient. In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one computing device to determine a position of the EM sensor relative to the at least one additional sensor; calculate a positional displacement of the EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases based on (i) the determined position of the EM sensor relative to the at least one additional sensor and (ii) the at least one magnitude of displacement of the at least one additional sensor between inspiration and expiration phases; and determine the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model based on the calculated positional displacement of EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases. In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises a first additional EM sensor positioned, in use, at a first position on the patient and a second additional EM sensor positioned, in use, at a second position of the patient, wherein the second position is spaced apart from the first position such that a first magnitude of displacement of the first additional EM sensor is greater than a second magnitude of displacement of the second additional EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases, and the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one computing device to determine a position of the EM sensor relative to the first and second additional EM sensors; and interpolate between the first and second magnitudes of displacement based on the determined position of the EM sensor relative to the first and second additional EM sensors, wherein the calculation of the positional displacement of the EM sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases is based on the interpolated magnitude.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one computing device to access data representing a model representing a topography of the tissue site; and a mapping between coordinate frames of the field and the model, wherein determining the position of the instrument is based on the mapping, the frequency, and the position of the EM sensor within the field. In some implementations, the tissue site comprises respiratory airways, and the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one computing device to calculate at least one magnitude of displacement of the at least one additional sensor between inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration of the patient; estimate a movement vector for at least a portion of the model based on the calculated at least one magnitude of displacement; translate the model within a coordinate frame based on the estimated movement vector; and determine the position of the instrument based on the translated model. In some implementations, to translate the model within the coordinate frame, the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one computing device to move a first portion of the model to first new coordinates based on the first magnitude of displacement; and move a second portion of the model to second new coordinates based on the second magnitude of displacement.
Another aspect relates to a method, comprising receiving first data from a first sensor on an instrument inserted, in use, in a tissue site of a patient and second data from at least one additional sensor configured to detect movement of the tissue site; calculating, based on the first data, a position of the first sensor within a volume around the tissue site; calculating, based on second data, a frequency of cyclic movement of the tissue site; determining a position of the instrument relative to the tissue site based on the frequency and the position of the first sensor within the volume.
Some implementations can be performed by one or more hardware processors.
Some implementations further comprise transforming the second data into a frequency domain representation; and identifying the frequency of the cyclic movement from the frequency domain representation.
Some implementations further comprise applying a filter to the first data, the filter configured to attenuate a portion of the first data with the identified frequency; and determining the position of the instrument based on the filtered first data.
In some implementations, the tissue site comprises respiratory airways, and the method further comprises calculating at least one magnitude of displacement of the at least one additional sensor between inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration of the patient. Some implementations further comprise determining a position of the first sensor relative to the at least one additional sensor; calculating a positional displacement of the first sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases based on (i) the determined position of the first sensor relative to the at least one additional sensor and (ii) the at least one magnitude of displacement of the at least one additional sensor between inspiration and expiration phases; and determining the position of the instrument relative based on the calculated positional displacement of first sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases. In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises a first additional sensor positioned, in use, at a first position on the patient and a second additional sensor positioned, in use, at a second position of the patient, wherein the second position is spaced apart from the first position such that a first magnitude of displacement of the first additional sensor is greater than a second magnitude of displacement of the second additional sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases, and the method further comprises determining a position of the first sensor relative to the first and second additional sensors; and interpolating between the first and second magnitudes of displacement based on the determined position of the first sensor relative to the first and second additional sensors, wherein the calculation of the positional displacement of the first sensor between the inspiration and the expiration phases is based on the interpolated magnitude. Some implementations further comprise accessing data representing a model representing a topography of the tissue site, and a mapping between coordinate frames of the field and the model; determining the position of the instrument is based on the mapping, the frequency, and the position of the EM sensor within the field. In some implementations, the tissue site comprises respiratory airways, and the method further comprises calculating at least one magnitude of displacement of the at least one additional sensor between inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration of the patient; estimating a movement vector for at least a portion of the model based on the calculated at least one magnitude of displacement; translating the model within a coordinate frame based on the estimated movement vector; and determining the position of the instrument based on the translated model. Some implementations further comprise translating the model within the coordinate frame based on moving a first portion of the model to first new coordinates based on the first magnitude of displacement; and moving a second portion of the model to second new coordinates based on the second magnitude of displacement.
Another aspect relates to a system configured to navigate a luminal network of a patient, the system comprising a field generator configured to generate an electromagnetic (EM) field; a set of one or more EM sensors including at a distal end of a steerable instrument; at least one respiration sensor; at least one computer-readable memory having stored thereon executable instructions; and one or more processors in communication with the at least one computer-readable memory and configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least access a preoperative model representative of the luminal network; access a mapping between a coordinate frame of the EM field and a coordinate frame of the preoperative model; calculate a position of the set of EM sensors within the EM field based on a data signal from the set of EM sensors; determine a position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model based on the mapping and the position of the set of EM sensors within the EM field; determine, based on data from the at least one respiration sensor, whether a respiration phase of the patient during acquisition of the data signal from the set of EM sensors corresponds to an inspiration phase or an expiration phase; and determine whether to activate a safety mode for a next movement of the steerable instrument based on the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the model and the respiration phase.
In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to activate the safety mode and, in the safety mode, implement one or more safety features to guide synchronization of the next movement with the respiration phase.
In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to access information regarding a navigation path through the luminal network to a target tissue site; identify, based on the navigation path and the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model, that the distal end of the steerable instrument is positioned, in use, within a predefined safety zone of the luminal network; and activate the safety mode based on determining that the distal end of the steerable instrument is positioned within the predefined safety zone. In some implementations, the navigation path includes a plurality of zones, and the safety zone is located in a portion of the luminal network where a difference between a respiratory passage diameter and a diameter of the distal end of the steerable instrument falls below a predetermined value.
In some implementations, in the safety mode, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to output information representative of the respiration phase to a user.
Some implementations further comprise a robotic system comprising a display; an input device configured to generate signals to control movement of the steerable instrument responsive to user manipulation of the input device; and instrument drivers configured to effect movement of the steerable instrument based on the signals from the input device. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to, in response to activating the safety mode, prevent actuation of the instrument drivers during expiration phases of the respiration of the patient. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to prevent the actuation of the instrument drivers by overriding attempted actuation of the instrument drivers based on user manipulation of the input device. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to output a graphical representation of inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration, the graphical representation displayable on the display.
In some implementations, the preoperative model comprises a three-dimensional computed tomography model of the luminal network of the patient.
Another aspect relates to an apparatus configured to guide navigation of a luminal network of a patient, the apparatus comprising at least one computer-readable memory having stored thereon executable instructions; and one or more processors in communication with the at least one computer-readable memory and configured to execute the instructions to cause the apparatus to at least access data corresponding to a model representative of the luminal network, a mapping between a coordinate frame of the model and a coordinate frame of an electromagnetic (EM) field generated around the luminal network, a signal from an EM sensor on a distal end of a steerable instrument inserted, in use, into the luminal network, and a signal from at least one additional sensor configured to detect movement of the luminal network; calculate a position of the EM sensor within the EM field based on the data corresponding to the signal from the EM sensor; calculate a next movement of the steerable instrument based on the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the model; determine, based on the data corresponding to the signal from the at least one additional sensor, whether a respiration phase of the patient during acquisition of the signal from the first sensor corresponds to an inspiration phase or an expiration phase; and determine whether to activate a safety mode for the next movement of the steerable instrument based on the respiration phase.
In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises one or more EM sensors.
In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises an accelerometer.
In some implementations, the at least one additional sensor comprises an acoustic respiratory sensor configured to detect the cyclic movement during patient respiration.
In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to activate the safety mode and, in the safety mode, implement one or more safety features to guide synchronization of the next movement with the respiration phase.
In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to access information regarding a navigation path through the luminal network to a target tissue site; identify, based on the navigation path and the position of the distal end of the steerable instrument relative to the preoperative model, that the distal end of the steerable instrument is positioned, in use, within a predefined safety zone of the luminal network; and activate the safety mode based on determining that the distal end of the steerable instrument is positioned within the predefined safety zone. In some implementations, the navigation path includes a plurality of zones, and the safety zone is located in a portion of the luminal network where a difference between a respiratory passage diameter and a diameter of the distal end of the steerable instrument falls below a predetermined value. In some implementations, in the safety mode, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to output information representative of the respiration phase to a user.
Some implementations further comprise a robotic system comprising a display; an input device configured to generate signals to control movement of the steerable instrument responsive to user manipulation of the input device; and instrument drivers configured to effect movement of the steerable instrument based on the signals from the input device. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to, in response to activating the safety mode, prevent actuation of the instrument drivers during one or more expiration phases of the respiration of the patient In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to prevent the actuation of the instrument drivers by overriding attempted actuation of the instrument drivers based on user manipulation of the input device. In some implementations, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to output a graphical representation of inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration, the graphical representation displayable on the display.
Another aspect relates to a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions that, when executed, cause a processor of a device to at least receive first data from a first sensor on an instrument inserted, in use, in a luminal network of a patient and second data from at least one additional sensor configured to detect movement of the luminal network; calculate a position of the first sensor within a field disposed around the tissue site based on the first data; determine, based on the second data, whether a respiration phase of the patient during acquisition of the first data from the first sensor corresponds to an inspiration phase or an expiration phase; determine a position of the instrument based on the mapping and the position of the first sensor within the field; and determine whether to activate a safety mode based on the position of the instrument and the respiration phase.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to at least receive image data from the at least one additional sensor and, based on the image data, determine whether the respiration phase corresponds to the inspiration phase or the expiration phase.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to at least receive accelerometer data from the at least one additional sensor and, based a direction of movement indicated by the accelerometer data, determine whether the respiration phase corresponds to the inspiration phase or the expiration phase.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to at least access data corresponding to (i) a model representing topography of the luminal network, and (ii) a mapping between coordinate frames of the field and the model; wherein determining the position of the instrument comprises determining a position of the instrument relative to the model based on the mapping and the position of the first sensor within the field.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to at least activate the safety mode and, in the safety mode, implement one or more safety features to guide synchronization of a next movement with the respiration phase.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to at least access information regarding a navigation path through the luminal network to a target tissue site; identify, based on the navigation path and the position of the instrument, that the instrument is positioned, in use, within a predefined safety zone of the luminal network; and activate the safety mode based on determining that the instrument is positioned within the predefined safety zone. In some implementations, the navigation path includes a plurality of zones, and the safety zone is located in a portion of the luminal network where a difference between a respiratory passage diameter and a diameter of the distal end of the steerable instrument falls below a predetermined value.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to at least, in response to determining to activate the safety mode, output information representative of the respiration phase to a user.
In some implementations, the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to at least, in response to determining to activate the safety mode, prevent actuation of robotic instrument drivers during expiration phases of the respiration of the patient, the robotic instrument drivers configured to effect movement of the instrument through the luminal network.
Another aspect relates to a method comprising receiving first data from a first sensor on an instrument inserted, in use, in a luminal network of a patient and second data from at least one additional sensor configured to detect movement of the luminal network; calculating a position of the first sensor within a field disposed around the tissue site based on the first data; determining, based on the second data, whether a respiration phase of the patient during acquisition of the first data from the first sensor corresponds to an inspiration phase or an expiration phase; determining a position of the instrument based on the position of the first sensor within the field; determining a next movement of the instrument based on the position; and determining whether to activate a safety mode for the next movement based on the respiration phase.
Some implementations can be performed by one or more hardware processors.
Some implementations further comprise activating the safety mode; and in the safety mode, implementing one or more safety features to guide synchronization of the next movement with the respiration phase.
Some implementations further comprise accessing data corresponding to (i) a model representing topography of the luminal network, and (ii) a mapping between coordinate frames of the field and the model; wherein determining the position of the instrument comprises determining a position of the instrument relative to the model based on the mapping and the position of the first sensor within the field.
Some implementations further comprise accessing information regarding a navigation path through the luminal network to a target tissue site; identifying, based on the navigation path and the position of the instrument, that the instrument is positioned, in use, within a predefined safety zone of the luminal network; and activating the safety mode based on determining that the instrument is positioned within the predefined safety zone.
Some implementations further comprise, in response to determining to activate the safety mode, outputting information representative of the respiration phase to a user.
Some implementations further comprise, in response to determining to activate the safety mode, preventing actuation of robotic instrument drivers during expiration phases of the respiration of the patient, the robotic instrument drivers configured to effect movement of the instrument through the luminal network. In some implementations, preventing the actuation of the robotic instrument drivers comprises overriding a user input to perform the next movement during the expiration phase or a subsequent expiration phase.
The disclosed aspects will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings and appendices, provided to illustrate and not to limit the disclosed aspects, wherein like designations denote like elements.
Introduction
Embodiments of the disclosure relate to systems and techniques that facilitate navigation through luminal networks, for example lung airways, by analyzing multiple navigation-related data sources to increase accuracy in estimation of location and orientation of a medical instrument within the luminal network, by filtering instrument position data to remove noise from cyclic movement of the luminal network, and/or by activating respiratory gating and other types of safety features that modify navigation control based on the cyclic movement.
A bronchoscope can include a light source and a small camera that allows a physician to inspect a patient's windpipe and airways. Patient trauma can occur if the precise location of the bronchoscope within the patient airways is not known. To ascertain the location of the bronchoscope, image-based bronchoscopy guidance systems can use data from the bronchoscope camera to perform local registrations (e.g., registrations at a particular location within a luminal network) at bifurcations of patient airways and so beneficially can be less susceptible to position errors due to patient breathing motion. However, as image-based guidance methods rely on the bronchoscope video, they can be affected by artifacts in bronchoscope video caused by patient coughing or mucous obstruction, etc.
Electromagnetic navigation-guided bronchoscopy (EMN bronchoscopy) is a type of bronchosopic procedure that implements electromagnetic (EM) technology to localize and guide endoscopic tools or catheters through the bronchial pathways of the lung. EMN bronchoscopy systems can use an EM field generator that emits a low-intensity, varying EM field and establishes the position of the tracking volume around the luminal network of the patient. The EM field is a physical field produced by electrically charged objects that affects the behavior of charged objects in the vicinity of the field. EM sensors attached to objects positioned within the generated field can be used to track locations and orientations of these objects within the EM field. Small currents are induced in the EM sensors by the varying electromagnetic field. The characteristics of these electrical signals are dependent on the distance and angle between a sensor and the EM field generator. Accordingly, an EMN bronchoscopy system can include an EM field generator, a steerable channel having an EM sensor at or near its distal tip, and a guidance computing system. The EM field generator generates an EM field around the luminal network of the patient to be navigated, for example airways, gastrointestinal tract, or a circulatory pathway. The steerable channel is inserted through the working channel of the bronchoscope and tracked in the EM field via the EM sensor.
Prior to the start of an EMN bronchoscopy procedure, a virtual, three-dimensional (3D) bronchial map can be obtained for the patient's specific airway structure, for example from a preoperative computed tomography (CT) chest scan. Using the map and an EMN bronchoscopy system, physicians can navigate to a desired location within the lung to biopsy lesions, stage lymph nodes, insert markers to guide radiotherapy or guide brachytherapy catheters. For example, a registration can be performed at the beginning of a procedure to generate a mapping between the coordinate system of the EM field and the model coordinate system. Thus, as the steerable channel is tracked during bronchoscopy, the steerable channel's position in the model coordinate system becomes nominally known based on position data from the EM sensor. However, the patient's breathing causes chest movement that can lead to errors in correlating the position of the steerable instrument and/or model with the coordinate frame of the EM field. These errors can be magnified in the peripheral airways, as the airway branches become smaller and experience greater movement due to patient respiration.
As used herein, a coordinate frame is the frame of reference of a particular sensing modality. For example, for EM data the EM coordinate frame is the frame of reference defined by the source of the EM field (e.g., the field generator). For CT images and for a segmented 3D model, this frame of reference is based on the frame defined by the scanner. The present navigation systems address the problem of navigation of representing (register) these different sources of data (which are in their own frames of reference) to the 3D model (i.e. the CT frame), for example in order to display the location of the instrument inside the model.
Accordingly, as described in more detail below, the disclosed luminal network navigation systems and techniques can combine input from both image-based navigation systems, robotic systems, and EM navigation systems, as well as input from other patient sensors, in order to mitigate navigational problems and enable more effective endoscopy procedures. For example, a navigation fusion framework can analyze image information received from an instrument camera, position information from an EM sensor on the instrument tip, and robotic position information from a robotic system guiding movement of the instrument. Based on the analysis, the navigation fusion framework can base instrument position estimates and/or navigation decisions on one or more of these types of navigation data. Some implementations of the navigation fusion framework can further determine instrument position relative to a 3D model of the luminal network. In some embodiments, the instrument position information from the EM sensor can be filtered to remove signal noise due to cyclic motion of the luminal network, for example due to respiration in airway navigation or due to pulsatile blood flow in circulatory system navigation. A frequency of the cyclic motion can be obtained from data from one or more additional sensors. For example, inspiration and expiration cycles can be determined based on data from additional EM sensor(s), accelerometer(s), and/or acoustic respiratory sensor(s) placed on the body of the patient and/or optical sensors positioned with a field of view to observe the movement of the patient. Some embodiments can implement navigation safety features based on one or both of instrument position and cyclic motion of the luminal network. For example, in a bronchoscopy implementation, the safety features can include display of respiration cycle information and/or limitations imposed on instrument insertion during expiration.
The disclosed systems and techniques can provide advantages for bronchoscopy guidance systems and other applications, including other types of endoscopic procedures for navigation of luminal networks. In anatomy, a “lumen” may refer to the inner open space or cavity of a tubular organ, as of an airway, a blood vessel, or an intestine. As used herein, a “luminal network” refers to an anatomical structure having at least one lumen leading towards a target tissue site, for example the airways of the lungs, the circulatory system, and the gastrointestinal system. Thus, although the present disclosure provides examples of navigation systems relating to bronchoscopy, it will be appreciated that the disclosed safety and data filtering aspects are applicable to other medical systems for navigation of a dynamic luminal network of a patient.
Various embodiments will be described below in conjunction with the drawings for purposes of illustration. It should be appreciated that many other implementations of the disclosed concepts are possible, and various advantages can be achieved with the disclosed implementations. Headings are included herein for reference and to aid in locating various sections. These headings are not intended to limit the scope of the concepts described with respect thereto. Such concepts may have applicability throughout the entire specification.
Overview of Example Navigation Systems
The surgical robotic system 110 can include one or more robotic arms for positioning and guiding movement of endoscope 115 through the luminal network 140 of the patient 101. Command center 105 can be communicatively coupled to the surgical robotic system 110 for receiving position data and/or providing control signals from a user. As used herein, “communicatively coupled” refers to any wired and/or wireless data transfer mediums, including but not limited to a wireless wide area network (WWAN) (e.g., one or more cellular networks), a wireless local area network (WLAN) (e.g., configured for one or more standards, such as the IEEE 802.11 (Wi-Fi)), Bluetooth, data transfer cables, and/or the like. The surgical robotic system 110 is discussed in more detail with respect to
The endoscope 115 may be a tubular and flexible surgical instrument that is inserted into the anatomy of a patient to capture images of the anatomy (e.g., body tissue) and provide a working channel for insertion of other medical instruments to a target tissue site. In some implementations, the endoscope 115 can be a bronchoscope. The endoscope 115 can include one or more imaging devices (e.g., cameras or other types of optical sensors) at its distal end. The imaging devices may include one or more optical components such as an optical fiber, fiber array, photosensitive substrate, and/or lens(es). The optical components move along with the tip of the endoscope 115 such that movement of the tip of the endoscope 115 results in corresponding changes to the field of view of the images captured by the imaging devices. The distal end of the endoscope 115 can be provided with one or more EM sensors 125 for tracking the position of the distal end within an EM field generated around the luminal network 140. The distal end of the endoscope 115 is further described with reference to
EM controller 135 can control EM field generator 120 to produce a varying EM field. The EM field can be time-varying and/or spatially varying, depending upon the embodiment. The EM field generator 120 can be an EM field generating board in some embodiments. Some embodiments of the disclosed patient navigation systems can use an EM field generator board positioned between the patient and the platform 102 supporting the patient, and the EM field generator board can incorporate a thin barrier that minimizes any tracking distortions caused by conductive or magnetic materials located below it. In other embodiments, an EM field generator board can be mounted on a robotic arm, for example similar to those shown in surgical robotic system 110, which can offer flexible setup options around the patient.
An EM spatial measurement system incorporated into the command center 105, surgical robotic system 110, and/or EM controller 135 can determine the location of objects within the EM field that are embedded or provided with EM sensor coils, for example EM sensors 125, 130. When an EM sensor is placed inside a controlled, varying EM field as described herein, voltages are induced in the sensor coils. These induced voltages can be used by the EM spatial measurement system to calculate the position and orientation of the EM sensor and thus the object having the EM sensor. As the magnetic fields are of a low field strength and can safely pass through human tissue, location measurement of an object is possible without the line-of-sight constraints of an optical spatial measurement system.
EM sensor 125 can be coupled to a distal end of the endoscope 115 in order to track its location within the EM field. The EM field is stationary relative to the EM field generator, and a coordinate frame of a 3D model of the luminal network can be mapped to a coordinate frame of the EM field. However, the patient's airways and thus the distal end of the endoscope 115 positioned within the airways can exhibit movement relative to the EM field generator 120 due to the respiratory cycles of the patient, leading to potential errors in determining the position of the distal end of the endoscope 115 relative to the model.
Accordingly, a number of additional EM sensors 130 can be provided on the body surface of the patient (e.g., in the region of the luminal network 140) in order to track displacement caused by respiration. A number of different EM sensors 130 can be spaced apart on the body surface in order to track the different displacements at these locations. For example, the periphery of the lungs may exhibit greater motion due to respiration than the central airways, and providing a number of EM sensors 130 as shown can enable more precise analysis of these motion effects. To illustrate, the distal end of the endoscope 115 travels through different regions of the luminal network 140 and thus experiences varying levels of displacement due to patient respiration as it travels through these different regions. The disclosed position filtering techniques can correlate the approximate position of the distal end of the endoscope 115 with one or more of the additional EM sensors 130, and can use identified displacement magnitudes of these specific additional EM sensors to correct for noise or artifacts in the endoscope position signal due to airway movement, for example, via filtering/removal of respiratory motion artifact component(s) of the endoscope position signal.
In other embodiments, other types of sensors configured to detect movement of the luminal network of the patient can be used instead of or in addition to the additional EM sensors 130. For example, one or more inertial sensors (e.g., accelerometer(s), gyroscope(s), etc.) can be positioned on the body surface of the patient to help estimate displacement of the chest surface during respiration. In another example, an acoustic respiratory sensor may be placed on the body surface of the patient in the region of the airways (e.g., luminal network region 140) and used to measure the inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration cycle. In another example, an optical sensor (e.g., an imaging device) can capture a stream of images of the patient's body and these images can be analyzed to identify respiration phase and/or displacement. In some implementations, the patient 101 may be breathing with assistance from a ventilator during the procedure, and the ventilator (and/or a device communicatively coupled to the ventilator) may provide data representing inspiration and expiration phases of the respiration cycle.
In some embodiments, a 2D display of a 3D luminal network model as described herein, or a cross-section of a 3D model, can resemble
The robotic arm 175 may be coupled to an instrument device manipulator (IDM) 190 using a mechanism changer interface (MCI) 160. The IDM 190 can be removed and replaced with a different type of IDM, for example, a first type of IDM configured to manipulate an endoscope or a second type of IDM configured to manipulate a laparoscope. The MCI 160 includes connectors to transfer pneumatic pressure, electrical power, electrical signals, and optical signals from the robotic arm 175 to the IDM 190. The MCI 160 can be a set screw or base plate connector. The IDM 190 manipulates surgical instruments, for example the endoscope 115 using techniques including direct drive, harmonic drive, geared drives, belts and pulleys, magnetic drives, and the like. The MCI 160 is interchangeable based on the type of IDM 190 and can be customized for a certain type of surgical procedure. The robotic 175 arm can include a joint level torque sensing and a wrist at a distal end.
Robotic arm 175 of the surgical robotic system 110 can manipulate the endoscope 115 using elongate movement members. The elongate movement members may include pull wires, also referred to as pull or push wires, cables, fibers, or flexible shafts. For example, the robotic arm 175 can actuate multiple pull wires coupled to the endoscope 115 to deflect the tip of the endoscope 115. The pull wires may include both metallic and non-metallic materials, for example stainless steel, Kevlar, tungsten, carbon fiber, and the like. The endoscope 115 may exhibit nonlinear behavior in response to forces applied by the elongate movement members. The nonlinear behavior may be based on stiffness and compressibility of the endoscope 115, as well as variability in slack or stiffness between different elongate movement members.
The base 180 can be positioned such that the robotic arm 175 has access to perform or assist with a surgical procedure on a patient, while a user such as a physician may control the surgical robotic system 110 from the comfort of the command console. In some embodiments, the base 180 may be coupled to a surgical operating table or bed for supporting the patient. The base 180 can be communicatively coupled to the command console 105 shown in
The base 180 can include a source of power 182, pneumatic pressure 186, and control and sensor electronics 184—including components such as a central processing unit, data bus, control circuitry, and memory—and related actuators such as motors to move the robotic arm 175. The electronics 184 can implement the navigation control techniques, safety modes, and/or data filtering techniques described herein. The electronics 184 in the base 180 may also process and transmit control signals communicated from the command console. In some embodiments, the base 180 includes wheels 188 to transport the surgical robotic system 110 and wheel locks/brakes (not shown) for the wheels 188. Mobility of the surgical robotic system 110 helps accommodate space constraints in a surgical operating room as well as facilitate appropriate positioning and movement of surgical equipment. Further, the mobility allows the robotic arm 175 to be configured such that the robotic arm 175 does not interfere with the patient, physician, anesthesiologist, or any other equipment. During procedures, a user may control the robotic arm 175 using control devices, for example the command console.
The console base 201 may include a central processing unit, a memory unit, a data bus, and associated data communication ports that are responsible for interpreting and processing signals such as camera imagery and tracking sensor data, e.g., from the endoscope 115 shown in
The user 205 can control a surgical instrument such as the endoscope 115 using the command console 200 in a velocity mode or position control mode. In velocity mode, the user 205 directly controls pitch and yaw motion of a distal end of the endoscope 115 based on direct manual control using the control modules. For example, movement on the joystick 204 may be mapped to yaw and pitch movement in the distal end of the endoscope 115. The joystick 204 can provide haptic feedback to the user 205. For example, the joystick 204 may vibrate to indicate that the endoscope 115 cannot further translate or rotate in a certain direction. The command console 200 can also provide visual feedback (e.g., pop-up messages) and/or audio feedback (e.g., beeping) to indicate that the endoscope 115 has reached maximum translation or rotation. The haptic and/or visual feedback can also be provided due to the system operating in a safety mode during patient expiration as described in more detail below.
In position control mode, the command console 200 uses a three-dimensional (3D) map of a patient luminal network and input from navigational sensors as described herein to control a surgical instrument, e.g., the endoscope 115. The command console 200 provides control signals to robotic arms 175 of the surgical robotic system 110 to manipulate the endoscope 115 to a target location. Due to the reliance on the 3D map, position control mode may require accurate mapping of the anatomy of the patient.
In some embodiments, users 205 can manually manipulate robotic arms 175 of the surgical robotic system 110 without using the command console 200. During setup in a surgical operating room, the users 205 may move the robotic arms 175, endoscope 115 (or endoscopes), and other surgical equipment to access a patient. The surgical robotic system 110 may rely on force feedback and inertia control from the users 205 to determine appropriate configuration of the robotic arms 175 and equipment.
The displays 202 may include electronic monitors (e.g., LCD displays, LED displays, touch-sensitive displays), virtual reality viewing devices, e.g., goggles or glasses, and/or other display devices. In some embodiments, the display modules 202 are integrated with the control modules, for example, as a tablet device with a touchscreen. In some embodiments, one of the displays 202 can display a 3D model of the patient's luminal network and virtual navigation information (e.g., a virtual representation of the end of the endoscope within the model based on EM sensor position) while the other of the displays 202 can display image information received from the camera or another sensing device at the end of the endoscope 115. In some implementations, the user 205 can both view data and input commands to the surgical robotic system 110 using the integrated displays 202 and control modules. The displays 202 can display 2D renderings of 3D images and/or 3D images using a stereoscopic device, e.g., a visor or goggles. The 3D images provide an “endo view” (i.e., endoscopic view), which is a computer 3D model illustrating the anatomy of a patient. The “endo view” provides a virtual environment of the patient's interior and an expected location of an endoscope 115 inside the patient. A user 205 compares the “endo view” model to actual images captured by a camera to help mentally orient and confirm that the endoscope 115 is in the correct—or approximately correct—location within the patient. The “endo view” provides information about anatomical structures, e.g., the shape of airways, circulatory vessels, or an intestine or colon of the patient, around the distal end of the endoscope 115. The display modules 202 can simultaneously display the 3D model and CT scans of the anatomy the around distal end of the endoscope 115. Further, the display modules 202 may overlay the already determined navigation paths of the endoscope 115 on the 3D model and CT scans.
In some embodiments, a model of the endoscope 115 is displayed with the 3D models to help indicate a status of a surgical procedure. For example, the CT scans identify a lesion in the anatomy where a biopsy may be necessary. During operation, the display modules 202 may show a reference image captured by the endoscope 115 corresponding to the current location of the endoscope 115. The display modules 202 may automatically display different views of the model of the endoscope 115 depending on user settings and a particular surgical procedure. For example, the display modules 202 show an overhead fluoroscopic view of the endoscope 115 during a navigation step as the endoscope 115 approaches an operative region of a patient.
The illumination sources 310 provide light to illuminate a portion of an anatomical space. The illumination sources can each be one or more light-emitting devices configured to emit light at a selected wavelength or range of wavelengths. The wavelengths can be any suitable wavelength, for example visible spectrum light, infrared light, x-ray (e.g., for fluoroscopy), to name a few examples. In some embodiments, illumination sources 310 can include light-emitting diodes (LEDs) located at the distal end 300. In some embodiments, illumination sources 310 can include one or more fiber optic fibers extending through a length of the endoscope to transmit light through the distal end 300 from a remote light source, for example an x-ray generator. Where the distal end 300 includes multiple illumination sources 310 these can each be configured to emit the same or different wavelengths of light as one another.
The imaging device 315 can include any photosensitive substrate or structure configured to convert energy representing received light into electric signals, for example a charge-coupled device (CCD) or complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor. Some examples of imaging device 315 can include one or more optical fibers, for example a fiber optic bundle, configured to transmit an image from the distal end 300 of the endoscope to an eyepiece and/or image sensor at the proximal end of the endoscope. Imaging device 315 can additionally include one or more lenses and/or wavelength pass or cutoff filters as required for various optical designs. The light emitted from the illumination sources 310 allows the imaging device 315 to capture images of the interior of a patient's luminal network. These images can then be transmitted as individual frames or series of successive frames (e.g., a video) to a computer system such as command console 200 for processing as described herein.
Electromagnetic coils 305 located on the distal end 300 may be used with an electromagnetic tracking system to detect the position and orientation of the distal end 300 of the endoscope while it is disposed within an anatomical system. In some embodiments, the coils 305 may be angled to provide sensitivity to electromagnetic fields along different axes, giving the disclosed navigational systems the ability to measure a full 6 degrees of freedom: three positional and three angular. In other embodiments, only a single coil may be disposed on or within the distal end 300 with its axis oriented along the endoscope shaft of the endoscope. Due to the rotational symmetry of such a system, it is insensitive to roll about its axis, so only 5 degrees of freedom may be detected in such an implementation.
Respiration sensor data repository 405 is a data storage device that stores data derived from a respiration sensor. As described above, the respiratory sensor can comprise EM sensor(s) 130, an acoustic respiratory sensor, an image sensor having a field of view positioned to capture images of the luminal network, and ventilator inflation/deflation information. In some embodiments, the respiratory sensor can comprise a number of EM sensors 130 and the data in the respiration sensor data repository 405 can include, for each sensor, time-dependent position data representing the positions of the sensor in the EM field over time. For example, data for each sensor can be stored as a tuple in the form of (x, y, z, tn) where x, y, and z represent the coordinates of the sensor in the EM field at time tn. The respiration sensor data repository 405 can store a number of such tuples for each sensor corresponding to a number of different times.
The respiration frequency and/or phase identifier 410 is a module configured to receive data from the respiration sensor data repository 405 and analyze such data to calculate the frequency and/or phase of respiration. Frequency relates to the time interval between successive phases, for example between successive cycles of inspiration and expiration. As understood to one of ordinary skill in the art, the respiration frequency refers to the number of cycles of inspiration and expiration over a given length of time (e.g., cycles per second, cycles per minute, etc.). Phase refers to whether the respiration cycle is an inspiration phase (e.g., while the patient is inhaling) or an expiration phase (e.g., while the patient is exhaling). Some embodiments can use a Fourier transform to extract the frequency of respiration from the respiration sensor data, using data from one or all of the sensors in various embodiments.
The endoscope EM sensor data repository 415 is a data storage device that stores data derived from an EM sensor at the distal end of an endoscope. As described above, such a sensor could include EM sensor 125, and EM sensor coils 305 and the resulting data can be used to identify position and orientation of the sensor within the EM field. Similar to the data from EM respiration sensors, data for an endoscope EM sensor can be stored as a tuple in the form of (x, y, z, tn) where x, y, and z represent the coordinates of the sensor in the EM field at time tn. Some embodiments may further include roll, pitch, and yaw of the instrument in the EM sensor tuple. The endoscope EM sensor data repository 415 can store a number of such tuples for each endoscope-based sensor corresponding to a number of different times.
The endoscope position estimator 420 is a module that receives data from the endoscope EM sensor data repository 415 and additionally from the respiration frequency and/or phase identifier 410 in some embodiments, and to use such data to reduce “noise” in the signal received from the endoscope EM sensor due to cyclic movement of the luminal network of the patient. For example, in one implementation endoscope position estimator 420 can generate a filter based on the determined respiration frequency and apply the filter to the data from the endoscope EM sensor. In another implementation, endoscope position estimator 420 can identify a magnitude of displacement of one or more of the respiration sensors during respiration and can apply the displacement value as a bias to the position indicated by the endoscope EM sensor data. This can be performed dynamically, for example by identifying respiration sensor displacement at time tn and applying that as a bias to the endoscope position at time tn, by identifying a next respiration sensor displacement at time tn+1, and applying that as a bias to the endoscope position at time tn+1, and so on.
The model data repository 425 is a data storage device that stores data representing a model of the luminal network of the patient. As an example, a preoperative procedure can be performed to take CT scans of a patient's lungs, and a computing system can use data from these scans to build a 3D model of the lungs of the patient. Such a model can provide 3D information about the structure and connectivity of the luminal network, including the topography and/or diameters of patient airways in some examples. Some CT scans are performed at breath-hold so that the patient's airways are expanded to their full diameter.
The registration calculator 465 is a module that can identify a registration or mapping between the coordinate frame of the 3D model (e.g., a coordinate frame of the CT scanner used to generate the model) and the coordinate frame of the EM field (e.g., of the EM field generator 120). In order to track a sensor through the patient's anatomy, the navigation fusion system 400 may require a process known as “registration,” by which the registration calculator 465 finds the geometric transformation that aligns a single object between different coordinate systems. For instance, a specific anatomical site on a patient may have a representation in the 3D model coordinates and also in the EM sensor coordinates. In order to calculate an initial registration, one implementation of the registration calculator 465 can perform registration as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 15/268,238, filed Sep. 17, 2016, titled “Navigation of Tubular Networks,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. As an example of one possible registration technique, the registration calculator 465 can receive data from the endoscope imaging data repository 480 and the EM sensor data repository 415 at a number of different points as the endoscope is inserted into the airways of the patient, for example as the endoscope reaches various bifurcations. The image data can be used to identify when the distal end of the endoscope has reached a bifurcation, for example via automated feature analysis. The registration calculator 465 can receive data from the endoscope EM sensor data repository 415 and identify a location of the EM sensor at the distal end of the endoscope as the endoscope is positioned at the bifurcation. Some examples can use not only bifurcations but other points in the patient's airway, and may map such points to corresponding points in a “skeleton” model of the airway. The registration calculator 465 can can use data linking at least three of EM positions to points in the model in order to identify the geometric transformation between the EM field and the model. Another embodiment can involve manual registration, for example by taking at least 3 from a first bifurcation of the patient's airway and from two more bifurcations in the left and right lungs, and can use the corresponding points to calculate the registration. This data to perform the geometric transformation (also referred to as registration data) can be stored in the registration data repository 475 as registration data.
After the initial registration is determined, the registration calculator 465 may update its estimate of the registration transform based on received data so as to increase transform accuracy as well as to compensate for changes to the navigation system, e.g., changes due to movement of the patient. In some aspects, the registration calculator 465 may update the estimate of the registration transform continually, at defined intervals, and/or based on the position of the endoscope (or component(s) thereof) in the luminal network.
Registration data repository 475 is a data storage device that stores the registration data that, as just discussed, is usable to perform a geometric transformation from the coordinate frame of the EM field to the coordinate frame of the model. Also discussed above, the registration data may be generated by the registration calculator 465 and may be updated continually or periodically in some implementations.
The location calculator 430 is a module that receives data from the model data repository 425, registration data repository 475, and the scope position estimator 420 to translate EM sensor coordinates into 3D model coordinates. The scope position estimator 420 calculates an initial position of the EM sensor relative to the position of the EM field generator, as described above. This position also corresponds to a location within the 3D model. In order to translate the initial position of the EM sensor from the EM coordinate frame into the model coordinate frame, the location calculator 430 can access the mapping between the EM coordinate frame and the model coordinate frame (e.g., registration data) as stored in the registration data repository 475. In order to translate the scope position into the 3D model coordinate frame, the location calculator 430 receives, as input, data representing the topography of the 3D model from the model data repository 425, data representing the registration between the EM field and the coordinate frame of the 3D model from the registration data repository 475, and the position of the scope in the EM field from the scope position estimator 420. Some embodiments can also receive prior estimated state data from the state estimator 440. Based on the received data, the location calculator 430 may perform, e.g., on-the-fly transformation of the EM sensor position data to a position in the 3D model. This can represent a preliminary estimate of the position of the distal end of the scope within the topography of the 3D model and can be provided as one input to the state estimator 440 for generating a final estimate of the scope position, as described in more detail below.
The endoscope imaging data repository 480 is a data storage device that stores image data received from a camera of the endoscope, for example the imaging device 315. The image data can be discrete images or series of image frames in a video sequence in various embodiments.
The image analyzer 435 is a module that receives data from the endoscope imaging data repository 480 and model data repository 425 and can compare this data to determine endoscope positioning. For example, the image analyzer 435 can access volume-rendered or surface-rendered endoluminal images of the airway tree from the model scans and can compare the rendered images with the real-time image or video frames from the imaging device 315. For example, the images can be registered (e.g., using Powell's optimization, simplex or gradient methods, gradient descent algorithms with normalized cross correlation or mutual information as costs), and then weighted normalized sum of square difference errors and normalized mutual information can be used for comparing the registered images obtained from the two sources. Similarity between a 2D image from the scan and a 2D image received from the endoscope can indicate that the endoscope is positioned near the location of the image from the scan. Such image-based navigation can perform local registrations at bifurcations of patient airways and so can be less susceptible to noise due to patient breathing motion than EM tracking systems. However, as the image analyzer 435 relies on the endoscope video, the analysis can be affected by artifacts in the images caused by patient coughing or mucous obstruction.
The image analyzer 435 can implement object recognition techniques in some embodiments, by which the image analyzer 435 can detect objects present in the field of view of the image data, such as branch openings, lesions, or particles. Using object recognition, the image analyzer can output object data indicating information about what objects were identified, as well as positions, orientations, and/or sizes of objects represented as probabilities. As one example, object recognition can be used to detect objects that may indicate branch points in a luminal network and then determine their position, size, and/or orientation. In one embodiment, in a given image within a luminal network, each branch will typically appear as a dark, approximately elliptical region, and these regions may be detected automatically by a processor, using region-detection algorithms such as maximally stable extremal regions (MSER) as objects. The image analyzer 435 can use light reflective intensity combined with other techniques to identify airways. Further, image analyzer 435 can further track detected objects across a set of sequential image frames to detect which branch has been entered from among a set of possible branches in the luminal network.
The robotic position data repository 470 is a data storage device that stores robotic position data received from surgical robotic system 110, for example data related to physical movement of the medical instrument or part of the medical instrument (e.g., the instrument tip or distal end) by the surgical robotic system 110 within the luminal network. Example robotic position data may include, e.g., command data instructing the instrument tip to reach a specific anatomical site and/or change its orientation (e.g., with a specific pitch, roll, yaw, insertion, and retraction for one or both of a leader and a sheath of an endoscopic instrument) within the luminal network, insertion data representing insertion movement of the part of the medical instrument (e.g., the instrument tip or sheath), IDM data, and mechanical data representing mechanical movement of an elongate member of the medical instrument, such as, for example, motion of one or more pull wires, tendons or shafts of the endoscope that drive the actual movement of the endoscope within the luminal network.
The navigation path data repository 445 is a data storage device that stores data representing a pre-planned navigation path through the luminal network to a target tissue site. Navigating to a particular point in a luminal network of a patient's body may require certain steps to be taken pre-operatively in order to generate the information needed to create the 3D model of the tubular network and to determine a navigation path within it. As described above, a 3D model may be generated of the topography and structure of the specific patient's airways. A target can be selected, for example a lesion to biopsy or a portion of organ tissue to repair surgically. In one embodiment, the user is capable of selecting the location of the target by interfacing with a computer display that can show the 3D model, such as by clicking with a mouse or touching a touchscreen. In some embodiments, the navigation path may be identified programmatically by analysis of the model and an identified lesion site to derive a shortest navigation path to the lesion. In some embodiments the path may be identified by a physician, or an automatically-identified path may be modified by a physician. The navigation path can identify a sequence of branches within the luminal network to travel through so as to reach the identified target.
The state estimator 440 is a module that receives inputs and performs analysis of the inputs to determine a state of the medical instrument. For example, the state estimator 440 can receive, as inputs, data from the respiration frequency and/or phase identifier 410, scope position estimator 420, location calculator 430, image analyzer 435, navigation path data repository 445, and robotic position data repository 470. The state estimator 440 can implement a probabilistic analysis to determine a state and corresponding probability of the medical instrument within the luminal network given the provided inputs. Estimated state can refer to one or more of (1) the x,y,z position of the instrument relative to a coordinate frame of a model of the luminal network, (2) whether the instrument is located in a certain region of the model, for example a particular airway branch or pre-identified safety zone, (3) pitch, roll, yaw, insertion, and/or retraction of the instrument, and (4) distance to target. The state estimator 440 can provide the estimated state of the instrument (or the distal tip of the instrument) as a function of time.
In some embodiments, the state estimator 440 can implement a Bayesian framework to determine the state and corresponding probability. Bayesian statistical analysis starts with a belief, called a prior, and then update that belief with observed data. The prior represents an estimate of what the Bayesian model parameters might be and can be represented as a parameterized distribution. The observed data can be gathered to obtain evidence about actual values of the parameters. The outcome of Bayesian analysis is called a posterior, and represents a probabilistic distribution expressing events in terms of confidence. If further data is obtained the posterior can be treated as the prior and updated with the new data. This process employs the Bayes rule, which indicates a conditional probability, for example how likely is event A if event B happens.
With respect to the disclosed navigation fusion system 400, the state estimator 440 can use previously estimated state data as the prior and can use the inputs from the respiration frequency and/or phase identifier 410, scope position estimator 420, location calculator 430, image analyzer 435, navigation path data repository 445, and/or robotic position data repository 470 as observed data. At the outset of a procedure, a vision-based initialization technique can be used to estimate the initial depth and roll in the trachea, and this estimate can be used as the prior. The state estimator 440 can perform Bayesian statistical analysis of the prior and observed data to generate a posterior distribution representing a probability and confidence value of each of a number of possible states.
The “probability” of the “probability distribution”, as used herein, refers to a likelihood of an estimation of a possible location and/or orientation of the medical instrument being correct. For example, different probabilities may be calculated by one of the algorithm modules indicating the relative likelihood that the medical instrument is in one of several different possible branches within the luminal network. In one embodiment, the type of probability distribution (e.g., discrete distribution or continuous distribution) is chosen to match features of an estimated state (e.g., type of the estimated state, for example continuous position information vs. discrete branch choice). As one example, estimated states for identifying which segment the medical instrument is in for a trifurcation may be represented by a discrete probability distribution, and may include three discrete values of 20%, 30% and 50% representing chance as being in the location inside each of the three branches as determined by one of the algorithm modules. As another example, the estimated state may include a roll angle of the medical instrument of 40±5 degrees and a segment depth of the instrument tip within a branch may be is 4±1 mm, each represented by a Gaussian distribution which is a type of continuous probability distribution.
In contrast, the “confidence value,” as used herein, reflects a measure of confidence in the estimation of the state provided by one of the modules of
For example one factor may be that a particular algorithm has differing levels of accuracy at different depths in a patient's lungs, such that relatively close to the airway opening, a particular algorithm may have a high confidence in its estimations of medical instrument location and orientation, but the further into the bottom of the lung the medical instrument travels that confidence value may drop. Generally, the confidence value is based on one or more systemic factors relating to the process by which a result is determined, whereas probability is a relative measure that arises when trying to determine the correct result from multiple possibilities with a single algorithm based on underlying data.
As one example, a mathematical equation for calculating results of an estimated state represented by a discrete probability distribution (e.g., branch/segment identification for a trifurcation with three values of an estimated state involved) can be as follows:
S1=CEM*P1,EM+CImage*P1,Image+CRobot*P1,Robot;
S2=CEM*P2,EM+CImage*P2,Image+CRobot*P2,Robot;
S3=CEM*P3,EM+CImage*P3,Image+CRobot*P3,Robot.
In the example mathematical equation above, Si(i=1, 2, 3) represents possible example values of an estimated state in a case where 3 possible segments are identified or present in the 3D model, CEM, CImage, and CRobot represents confidence value corresponding to EM-based algorithm, image-based algorithm, and robot-based algorithm and Pi,EM, Pi,Image, and Pi,Robot represent the probabilities for segment i. Because of the probabilistic nature of such a fusion algorithm, respiration can be tracked over time and even predicted to overcome latency and outlier disturbances.
In some embodiments, confidence values for data from the scope position estimator 420, registration calculator, and image analyzer 435 can be adaptively determined based on the respiration phase from the respiration frequency and/or phase identifier 410. For example, robotic position data and image data can be affected differently than EM sensor data by respiration motion. In some embodiments, vision data obtained from the endoscope imaging data repository 430 can be used to detect certain kinds of respiratory motion that are not detectable via sensors external to the luminal network, for example movement of an airway in a cranial-caudal (backward-forward) motion that can be detected through vision processing.
The safety zone data repository 455 is a data storage device that stores data representing areas and/or conditions for which particular caution should be exercised during instrument insertion. For example, as described above the 3D model can include information relating to airway diameter. Branches of the luminal network having diameters less than or equal to the diameter of the endoscope, or within a predetermined threshold (e.g., 1-2 mm, around 4 mm, or any other threshold distance) of the endoscope diameter, can be designated as safety zones. Such designation can be made programmatically by a processor in some embodiments via comparison of the diameters. As another example, certain phases of the patient respiration cycle can be designated as a safety “zone,” such as the expiration phase of patient respiration, or such as a transition phase beginning in expiration and ending partway into inspiration during which the patient's airways are expected to be constricted. In some embodiments the threshold can be configurable based on factors including dimensions of the instrument, control tolerances of the controlled movement, user configurable preferences, etc. The safety zone data repository 455 can store instructions regarding robotic system operation and/or limitations in various safety zones in some embodiments.
The safety mode controller 450 is a module that receives a number of inputs and determine whether to activate a safety mode. For example, the safety mode controller 450 can receive, as inputs, data from the safety zone data repository 455, respiration phase data from the respiration frequency and/or phase identifier 410, and an estimated state output from the state estimator 440. The safety mode controller 450 can compare the respiration phase and estimated state to the data from the safety zone repository to determine whether to activate a safety mode.
The navigation controller 460 is a module that receives data from the safety mode controller 450 and uses this data to guide further operation of the surgical robotic system 110. For example, when a safety mode is activated, the navigation controller 460 can receive data from the safety mode controller 450 regarding specific display instructions and/or IDM operation instructions. When a safety mode is not activated, the navigation controller 460 can receive data from the safety mode controller 450 regarding the estimated state and any next movement identified in the navigation path data.
Overview of Example Navigation Techniques
In accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure,
At block 505, location calculator 430 can access a model of a patient's luminal network, for example, from model data repository 425. For example, the model can be a segmented map of a patient's airways generated from CT scans in some implementations. The model can be any two or three dimensional representation of the actual luminal network (or a portion of the luminal network) of the patient.
At block 510, the endoscope position estimator 420 can receive data from instrument sensor(s) and the respiration frequency/phase identifier 410 can receive data respiration sensor(s), for example from respiration sensor data repository 405 and endoscope EM sensor data repository 410, respectively. As described above, the endoscope sensor data can be derived from an EM sensor on an endoscope and can provide location and/or orientation of a distal end of the endoscope within an EM field generated around the luminal network, and the respiration sensor data can be generated by a sensor positioned to detect movement of the luminal network.
At block 515, the location calculator 430 can estimate a position of the instrument relative to the model. For example, a coordinate frame of the model may be mapped to a coordinate frame of the EM field at the outset of the medical procedure during registration (see above discussion on registration calculator 465 and registration data repository 475). The location calculator 430 can use this mapping (via the registration data) together with coordinates of the sensor position within the field to generate an initial estimate a location of the instrument sensor within the model. However, as described above, due to motion of patient airways during respiration, the initial registration of the model to the EM field coordinate frame may not accurately reflect the actual, dynamic position of the patient's airways within the EM field. Because the instrument is located within one of the dynamically moving airways, when the airway location within the EM field varies from the mapped location of that same airway in the model, the position estimated at block 515 may be inaccurate, e.g., to the respiratory motion artifact/component of the estimated position of the instrument.
At block 520, the respiration frequency and/or phase identifier 410 can extract the frequency of the respiration from the data from the respiration sensor(s), for example by using a Fourier transform to extract the frequency of the respiration. The Fourier transform can be applied to data from one or more sensors in embodiments having multiple respiration sensors.
At block 525, the location calculator 430 and/or endoscope position estimator 420 can implement a filtering stage 535 to adjust one or both of the instrument and model positions based on the identified frequency of the respiration in order to compensate for the cyclic movement of the luminal network. Various implementations of the filtering stage 535 are described in more detail with respect to
At block 530, the state estimator 440 can output an indication of the instrument position. The output can be provided to a navigation system, for example the surgical robotic system 110, to a user interface, for example display 202, or both. In some embodiments, the indication can be output to the state estimator 440 for use in determining a probable state of the instrument.
Turning to
At block 610, the endoscope position estimator 420 can apply the filter designed at block 605 to the data from the instrument EM sensor to filter out portions of the data. By doing so, the process 600A can filter out portions of the EM sensor signal that are typically considered “noise” and that lead to inaccurate registrations with the 3D model. Because the EM sensor position is registered to a static 3D model, filtering out portions of the signal that occur during respiration conditions that vary from the respiration conditions during which the model was generated can increase the accuracy of the registration.
Turning to
At block 620, the endoscope position estimator 420 can identify a relative position of the instrument sensor relative to the respiration sensors. For example, x and y coordinates (representing the length and width locations in the EM field) can be compared to determine a closest respiration sensor and/or a relative distance between the instrument sensor and each respiration sensor.
At block 625, the process endoscope position estimator 420 can interpolate a displacement of the instrument sensor based on the displacements of the respiration sensors and the relative positioning of the instrument sensor and respiration sensors.
At block 630, the endoscope position estimator 420 can adjust the estimated instrument position calculated at block 515 by the interpolated displacement. As such, the adjusted position can represent a more accurate location of the instrument within the model by compensating for the displacement of the airway relative to the model coordinate frame.
Turning to
At block 635, the location calculator 430 can access a mapping of the 3D model to respiration sensor positions. For example, each respiration sensor can be mapped to an x and y coordinate within the model.
At block 640, the location calculator 430 can translate the model to new coordinates within the EM field coordinate frame based on this mapping and the displacement magnitudes. For example, at each (x,y) coordinate to which a sensor was mapped, the process 600C can adjust the z-value of the (x,y,z) model coordinates based on the magnitude of displacement of the mapped sensor. For (x,y) coordinates between mapped sensors the z-value can be adjusted based on a magnitude interpolated based on the magnitudes and distances from adjacent sensors. As such, the position of the model within the EM field coordinate frame can be dynamically adjusted to reflect movement of the patient's airways.
At block 645, the location calculator 430 can register the instrument position to the translated model. For example, the location calculator 430 can access the (x,y,z) coordinate data of the instrument sensor within the EM field and identify a corresponding location within the translated model.
Some embodiments of the process 500 can use one or more of the processes 600A, 600B, 600C to calculate the instrument position relative to the model in the filtering stage 535.
In accordance with one or more aspects of the present disclosure,
At block 705, the state estimator 440 can access a 3D model of a patient's luminal network, for example from model data repository 425.
At block 710, the state estimator 440 can receive data from one or both of instrument sensor(s) and respiration sensor(s), for example from respiration sensor data repository 405 and endoscope EM sensor data repository 415, or can receive analyses of such data from modules 410, 420, and/or 430. As described above, the endoscope sensor data can provide location and/or orientation of a distal end of the endoscope within an EM field generated around the luminal network, and the respiration sensor data can be generated by a sensor positioned to detect movement of the luminal network. After block 710, the process 700 may split into two sub-processes that can be performed individually or together in order to determine whether to activate a safety mode. These sub-processes, if performed together, can be performed in parallel or in series.
If the state estimator 440 receives instrument sensor position data at block 710, then the process 700 can transition to block 715. At block 715, the state estimator 440 can estimate the position of the instrument relative to the model. This estimate can be performed by any of processes 600A-600C described above in some embodiments in order to compensate for cyclic motion.
At decision block 720, the safety mode controller 450 determines whether the position of the instrument falls within a predefined safety zone of the 3D model. As described above, safety zones can be predefined based on airway and instrument diameter comparisons. If the position of the instrument does not fall within a safety zone, the process 700 loops back to block 710 to receive new data from the sensors. In other embodiments, the process 700 can transition to block 725.
If the position of the instrument does fall within a safety zone, the process 700 transitions to block 735 and safety mode controller 450 activates a safety mode for further navigation (e.g., a next movement of the instrument or subsequent movement(s) of the instrument).
Turning to block 725, if the process 700 receives respiration sensor position data at block 710, then the process 700 can transition to block 725. At block 725 the respiration frequency and/or phase identifier 410 can identify the respiration phase as either inspiration or expiration.
At decision block 730, the safety mode controller 450 determines whether the phase of the respiration corresponds with predefined safety conditions. In some embodiments, all expiration phases can be identified as safety conditions. In some embodiments, expiration when in certain branches of the airways can correspond to the safety conditions. In some embodiments, the safety mode controller 450 can analyze historical respiration frequency data to predict whether the next movements of the instrument will fall within a respiration phase correlated with safety conditions. If the phase (or predicted phase) of the respiration does not correspond with predefined safety conditions, the process 700 loops back to block 710 to receive new data from the sensors. In other embodiments, the process 700 can transition to block 715.
If the phase (or predicted phase) of the respiration does correspond with predefined safety conditions, the process 700 transitions to block 735 and the safety mode controller 450 activates a safety mode for further navigation (e.g., a next movement of the instrument or all subsequent movement of the instrument).
If the process 700 transitions to block 735 because the position of the instrument has entered a safety zone, in some embodiments safety mode may be activated for all further insertion as airways tend to decrease in diameter further toward the lung periphery and navigation paths tend to travel from the central airways outward toward the periphery. If the process 700 transitions to block 735 because the phase of respiration (e.g., expiration) causes the process to activate safety mode, the safety mode may be activated for the duration of a predicted expiration cycle or until a next detected inspiration cycle.
In a safety mode, some embodiments of the process 700 may implement the navigation controller 460 to place limitations on instrument movement. For example, in safety mode the navigation controller 460 may prevent the surgical robotic system 110 from actuating instrument drivers. In such embodiments, navigation controller 460 can override a user input into a robotic system to guide insertion of the instrument while the safety mode is activated, for example during patient expiration.
In some embodiments, the safety mode controller 450 may determine that the airway diameter of airways positioned down the navigation path from the calculated instrument location are smaller than the diameter of the instrument. Thus, in the safety mode navigation controller 460 may prevent further insertion and the user may be prompted to insert a smaller, steerable channel through the working channel of the endoscope for any further navigation.
In a safety mode, some embodiments of the process 700 may not place limitations on instrument movement but instead may provide output to the user to indicate that caution should be exercised during instrument movement. Such outputs include graphical (e.g., on display), audible, or tactile (e.g., haptic feedback through an input device 204) warnings.
Overview of Example Navigation User Interfaces
The virtual navigation section 810 includes a visualization of the patient airways 812 and a visualization of the navigation path 814 through the airways. As described above, this can be based on a 3D model in some embodiments. In some embodiments the virtual navigation section 810 can alternatively or additionally display images received from the endoscope camera.
The respiration tracking section 820 includes a waveform 822 of patient respiration and a marker 824 indicating the current point in the respiration cycle. In the waveform 822, portions of the waveform having positive slopes may represent inspiration and portions having negative slopes may represent expiration. Some embodiments may additionally display a predicted waveform of future respiration based, for example, on frequency analysis of previous respiration cycles and/or ventilator cycle data. As illustrated, the current point in the respiration cycle corresponds to an expiration phase.
The warning 805 alerts the operator of the system to pause navigation during expiration. In some embodiments, the warning 805 can be accompanied by an additional warning 816 overlaid onto the virtual navigation section 810. In other embodiments the color of the display may change, an alarm may sound, an input joystick may vibrate, or other visual, audible, or tactile indications can be presented to alert the user that the device is operating in safety mode. In some embodiments user control of the robotic system 110 can be overridden in this state in order to mitigate trauma to patient airways.
Turning to
As described above, the virtual navigation section 810 includes a visualization of the patient airways 812 and a visualization of the navigation path 814 through the airways.
The model display section 830 includes a graphical representation of the 3D model with a current position marker 832 and safety zone marker 834. As illustrated, the current position 832 is within the safety zone 834. As such, the warning 805 alerts the operator of the system that they are navigating through a caution zone. Further alerts can be provided to assist the user with pausing navigation during expiration in the zone.
Alternative Filter Techniques
As mentioned above, some embodiments may utilize an approach that: (a) receives raw sensor data for a given time period, (b) applies a function (e.g., Fourier Transform) to determine the respiration rate on the raw sensor data to determine the respiration rate for the given time period, and (c) applies a filter on the raw sensor data to remove the components of the raw sensor data attributable to the determined respiration rate. However, these approaches may introduce undesirable delay from (a)-(c). To lessen the delay from (a)-(c), some embodiments may utilize predictive techniques for predicting the respiration rate for a future time period. One predictive approach may involve using a non-linear Kalman filter (such as, an extended Kalman filter (EKF), unscented Kalman filter (UKF) or other suitable approaches that apply a Kalman filter to non-linear function) to predict respiration motion in near or substantially real-time. As used herein, “real-time” refers to processing applied immediately following acquisition of sensor data, for example processing on sensor data that is completed within a sufficiently short window of time such that the processed data is able to be used for navigation of the instrument. An EKF or multiple EKFs (one for patch, one for scope) can identify in real time the amplitude, direction and phase of respiration. Embodiments may remove the respiration motion detected by the EKF or EKFs from the raw EM sensor data generated by the EM sensors, or any other location sensor. The EKF may process historical raw sensor data to predict the respiration motion for a current time period. The predicted respiration motion is then used to filter out the respiration component in the raw sensor data. An EKF or multiple EKFs (one for patch, one for scope) can identify in real time the amplitude, direction and phase of respiration. Other example embodiments may use other predictive techniques, such as alpha-beta filtering, Bayesian filtering, particle filtering, or the like.
Compensation for Robotic Commands
In some embodiments, movement of the instrument may exhibit motions similar to respiration. To compensate for these motions, embodiment for detecting and compensation for respiration rate (or any other physiological induced motion) may use the commanded motion data used to control (e.g., insert, retract, articulate) the instrument to avoid detecting that motion as the respiration rate. For example, if the instrument's movement is at a given rate (as determinable by the commanded data), embodiments described above may apply a filter to the sensor data to remove data attributable to that movement.
Alternative Sensor Types
As described above, aside from using EM sensors to determine the location of the instrument, other embodiments may use other suitable sensor types. Such location sensors may include shape sensing fibers, accelerometers, vision detection algorithms, gyroscopes, or any other suitable sensor that can detect properties of motion.
Compensation for Other Physiological Noise
Although much of the embodiments described herein are detect and compensate for noise create from a patient's respiration rate, other embodiments may detect and compensate for noise created by other physiological properties of the patient, such as heart rate or any other detectable property. In such cases, where the heart rate may create noise in the EM data, these embodiments may detect the frequency of the heart rate and use the techniques discussed above to remove the noise created by the heart rate. Other noise artifacts may also be detected, as may occur if the patient experiences a periodic tremor or physical movement.
Implementing Systems and Terminology
Implementations disclosed herein provide systems, methods and apparatus for improved navigation of luminal networks.
It should be noted that the terms “couple,” “coupling,” “coupled” or other variations of the word couple as used herein may indicate either an indirect connection or a direct connection. For example, if a first component is “coupled” to a second component, the first component may be either indirectly connected to the second component via another component or directly connected to the second component.
The robotic motion actuation functions described herein may be stored as one or more instructions on a processor-readable or computer-readable medium. The term “computer-readable medium” refers to any available medium that can be accessed by a computer or processor. By way of example, and not limitation, such a medium may comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer. It should be noted that a computer-readable medium may be tangible and non-transitory. As used herein, the term “code” may refer to software, instructions, code or data that is/are executable by a computing device or processor.
The methods disclosed herein comprise one or more steps or actions for achieving the described method. The method steps and/or actions may be interchanged with one another without departing from the scope of the claims. In other words, unless a specific order of steps or actions is required for proper operation of the method that is being described, the order and/or use of specific steps and/or actions may be modified without departing from the scope of the claims.
As used herein, the term “plurality” denotes two or more. For example, a plurality of components indicates two or more components. The term “determining” encompasses a wide variety of actions and, therefore, “determining” can include calculating, computing, processing, deriving, investigating, looking up (e.g., looking up in a table, a database or another data structure), ascertaining and the like. Also, “determining” can include receiving (e.g., receiving information), accessing (e.g., accessing data in a memory) and the like. Also, “determining” can include resolving, selecting, choosing, establishing and the like.
The phrase “based on” does not mean “based only on,” unless expressly specified otherwise. In other words, the phrase “based on” describes both “based only on” and “based at least on.”
The previous description of the disclosed implementations is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these implementations will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other implementations without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, it will be appreciated that one of ordinary skill in the art will be able to employ a number corresponding alternative and equivalent structural details, such as equivalent ways of fastening, mounting, coupling, or engaging tool components, equivalent mechanisms for producing particular actuation motions, and equivalent mechanisms for delivering electrical energy. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the implementations shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/480,257, filed on Mar. 31, 2017, entitled “ROBOTIC SYSTEMS FOR NAVIGATION OF LUMINAL NETWORKS THAT COMPENSATE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL NOISE,” the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1063914 | Dehlin | Jun 1913 | A |
| 4745908 | Wardle | May 1988 | A |
| 5273025 | Sakiyam et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5526812 | Dumoulin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5550953 | Seraji | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5831614 | Tognazzini et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5935075 | Casscells | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6038467 | De Bliek et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047080 | Chen | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059718 | Taniguchi et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6063095 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6167292 | Badano | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6203493 | Ben-Haim | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6246784 | Summers | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246898 | Vesely | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6290571 | Dilger et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6332089 | Acker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6425865 | Salcudean et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6454776 | Tajima et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466198 | Feinstein | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6490467 | Bucholz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6553251 | Lahdesmaki | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6665554 | Charles | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6690963 | Ben-Haim | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6690964 | Beiger et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6755797 | Stouffer | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6812842 | Dimmer | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6899672 | Chin | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6926709 | Beiger et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7180976 | Wink | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7206627 | Abovitz | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7233820 | Gilboa | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7386339 | Strommer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7697972 | Verard et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7756563 | Higgins | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7850642 | Moll et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7901348 | Soper | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8155403 | Tschirren | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8190238 | Moll et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8298135 | Ito et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8317746 | Sewell et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8394054 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8460236 | Roelle et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8821376 | Tolkowsky | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8858424 | Hasegawa | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8929631 | Pfister et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9014851 | Wong et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9084623 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9125639 | Mathis | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9138129 | Diolaiti | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9183354 | Baker et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9186046 | Ramamurthy et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9272416 | Hourtash et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9289578 | Walker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9459087 | Dunbar | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9504604 | Alvarez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9561083 | Yu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9603668 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9622827 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9629682 | Wallace et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9636184 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9710921 | Wong et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9713509 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9717563 | Tognaccini | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9727963 | Mintz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9737371 | Romo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9737373 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9744335 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9788910 | Schuh | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9818681 | Machida | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9844412 | Bogusky et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9867635 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9918681 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9931025 | Graetzel et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| 9949749 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9955986 | Shah | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9962228 | Schuh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9980785 | Schuh | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9993313 | Schuh et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10016900 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
| 10022192 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2018 | B1 |
| 10046140 | Kokish et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10080576 | Romo et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10123755 | Walker et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10130345 | Wong et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10136950 | Schoenefeld | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10136959 | Mintz et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10143360 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10143526 | Walker et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10145747 | Lin et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
| 10149720 | Romo | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10159532 | Ummalaneni et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
| 10159533 | Moll et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10169875 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10219874 | Yu et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10231793 | Romo | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10231867 | Alvarez et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10244926 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10278778 | State | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10285574 | Landey et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10299870 | Connolly et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10524866 | Srinivasan | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10639114 | Schuh | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10667875 | DeFonzo | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10743751 | Landey et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10751140 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10765487 | Ho | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10779898 | Hill et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10814101 | Jiang | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10820947 | Julian | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10820954 | Marsot et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10827913 | Ummalaneni et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10828118 | Schuh et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10973422 | Pantelopoulos et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 20010021843 | Bosselmann et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039421 | Heilbrun | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020065455 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077533 | Bieger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120188 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030105603 | Hardesty | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125622 | Schweikard | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181809 | Hall et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195664 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040047044 | Dalton | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040072066 | Cho et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097806 | Hunter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186349 | Ewers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249267 | Gilboa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263535 | Birkenbach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050027397 | Niemeyer | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060006 | Pflueger | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085714 | Foley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107679 | Geiger | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143649 | Minai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143655 | Satoh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182295 | Soper | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182319 | Glossop | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193451 | Quistgaard et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197557 | Strommer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256398 | Hastings | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272975 | McWeeney et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004286 | Chang | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015096 | Hauck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025668 | Peterson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058643 | Florent | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084860 | Geiger | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095066 | Chang | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098851 | Shoham | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149134 | Soper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173290 | Lavallee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184016 | Glossop | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209019 | Hu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258935 | Pile-Spellman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258938 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070032826 | Schwartz | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055128 | Glossop | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055144 | Neustadter | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073136 | Metzger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083193 | Werneth | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123748 | Meglan | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135886 | Maschke | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161857 | Durant et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167743 | Honda | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167801 | Webler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208252 | Makower | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253599 | White et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269001 | Maschke | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070293721 | Gilboa | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299353 | Harlev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080071140 | Gattani | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080079421 | Jensen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103389 | Begelman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118118 | Berger | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118135 | Averbach | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123921 | Gielen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147089 | Loh | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161681 | Hauck | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183064 | Chandonnet | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183068 | Carls et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183073 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183188 | Carls et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201016 | Finlay | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207997 | Higgins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080212082 | Froggatt et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080218770 | Moll et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243142 | Gildenberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262297 | Gilboa | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080275349 | Halperin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080287963 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300478 | Zuhars et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080306490 | Lakin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312501 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090030307 | Govari | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054729 | Mori | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076476 | Barbagli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149867 | Glozman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209817 | Averbuch | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090227861 | Ganatra | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228020 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248036 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259230 | Khadem | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262109 | Markowitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292166 | Ito | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090295797 | Sakaguchi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100008555 | Trumer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030061 | Canfield et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100039506 | Sarvestani et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100041949 | Tolkowsky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100054536 | Huang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100080415 | Qureshi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113852 | Sydora | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121139 | OuYang | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100160733 | Gilboa | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161022 | Tolkowsky | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161129 | Costa et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174178 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100225209 | Goldberg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100240989 | Stoianovici | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100290530 | Huang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100292565 | Meyer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298641 | Tanaka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100328455 | Nam et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110019878 | Soubelet et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054303 | Barrick | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110092808 | Shachar | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184238 | Higgins | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110234780 | Ito | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238082 | Wenderow | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245665 | Nentwick | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110248987 | Mitchell | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110249016 | Zhang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110257480 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276179 | Banks et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319910 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120046521 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120056986 | Popovic | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120059248 | Holsing et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120062714 | Liu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065481 | Hunter | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120069167 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120071782 | Patil et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120082351 | Higgins | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120120305 | Takahashi | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120165656 | Montag | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172712 | Bar-tal | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120191079 | Moll et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209069 | Popovic | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120215094 | Rahimian et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120219185 | Hu | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120289777 | Chopra | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120289783 | Duindam et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302869 | Koyrakh | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130060146 | Yang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130144116 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165945 | Roelle | Jun 2013 | A9 |
| 20130204124 | Duindam | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130225942 | Holsing | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243153 | Sra | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130246334 | Ahuja | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130259315 | Angot et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130303892 | Zhao | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130345718 | Crawford | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140058406 | Tsekos | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140107390 | Brown | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140114180 | Jain | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148808 | Inkpen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180063 | Zhao | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140235943 | Paris | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140243849 | Saglam | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257746 | Dunbar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140264081 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275988 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276033 | Brannan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276937 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296655 | Akhbardeh | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296657 | Izmirli et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309527 | Namati et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309649 | Alvarez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140343416 | Panescu | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140350391 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140357953 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140357984 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140364739 | Liu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140364870 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379000 | Romo et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150051482 | Liu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051592 | Kintz | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150054929 | Ito et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150057498 | Akimoto | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150073266 | Brannan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150101442 | Romo | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150119638 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150141808 | Elhawary | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150141858 | Razavi et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142013 | Tanner et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150164594 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150164596 | Romo | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223725 | Engel | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223897 | Kostrzewski et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223902 | Walker et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150255782 | Kim et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150265087 | Park | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150265368 | Chopra et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150275986 | Cooper | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150287192 | Sasaki | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150297133 | Jouanique-Dubuis | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305650 | Hunter | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150313503 | Seibel et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150335480 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160000302 | Brown | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160000414 | Brown | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160000520 | Lachmanovich | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160001038 | Romo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160008033 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160111192 | Suzara | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160128992 | Hudson | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160183841 | Duindam et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160184032 | Romo et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160199134 | Brown et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206389 | Miller | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160213432 | Flexman | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160228032 | Walker et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160270865 | Landey et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287279 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287346 | Hyodo et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160296294 | Moll et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160314710 | Jarc | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160331469 | Hall et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160360947 | Iida | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160372743 | Cho et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160374541 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170007337 | Dan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170023423 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170055851 | Al-Ali | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170065364 | Schuh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170065365 | Schuh | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170079725 | Hoffman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170079726 | Hoffman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170100199 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170119411 | Shah | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170119412 | Noonan et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170119413 | Romo | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170119481 | Romo et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170165011 | Bovay et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170172673 | Yu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170189118 | Chopra | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170202627 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170209073 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170215808 | Shimol | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170215969 | Zhai et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170238807 | Veritkov et al. | Aug 2017 | A9 |
| 20170258366 | Tupin, Jr. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170290631 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296032 | Li | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296202 | Brown | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170303941 | Eisner | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170325896 | Donhowe | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170333679 | Jiang | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170340241 | Yamada | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170340396 | Romo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170348067 | Krimsky | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170360418 | Wong et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170360508 | Germain et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170365055 | Mintz et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170367782 | Schuh et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180025666 | Ho et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180055576 | Koyrakh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180055582 | Krimsky | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180055583 | Schuh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180098690 | Iwaki | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180177383 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180177556 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180214011 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180217734 | Koenig et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180221038 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180221039 | Shah | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180240237 | Donhowe et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180250083 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180271616 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180279852 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180280660 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180286108 | Hirakawa | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180289243 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180289431 | Draper et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180308247 | Gupta | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180325499 | Landey et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180333044 | Jenkins | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180360435 | Romo | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180368920 | Ummalaneni | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190000559 | Berman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190000560 | Berman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190000566 | Graetzel et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190000568 | Connolly et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190000576 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190046814 | Senden et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190066314 | Abhari | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190083183 | Moll et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190086349 | Nelson | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190105776 | Ho et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190105785 | Meyer | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190107454 | Lin | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190110839 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190110843 | Ummalaneni et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190117176 | Walker et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190117203 | Wong et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190151148 | Alvarez et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190125164 | Roelle et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190167366 | Ummalaneni | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190175009 | Mintz | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190175062 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190175287 | Hill | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190175799 | Hsu | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190183585 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190183587 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216548 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216550 | Eyre | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216576 | Eyre | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190223974 | Romo | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190228525 | Mintz et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190228528 | Mintz et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190246882 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190262086 | Connolly et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190269468 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190274764 | Romo | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190287673 | Michihata | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190290109 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190298160 | Ummalaneni et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190298460 | Al-Jadda | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190298465 | Chin | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190328213 | Landey et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190336238 | Yu | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190365201 | Noonan et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190365209 | Ye et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190365479 | Rafii-Tari | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190365486 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190374297 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190375383 | Alvarez | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190380787 | Ye | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190380797 | Yu | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200000530 | DeFonzo | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200000533 | Schuh | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200022767 | Hill | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200038123 | Graetzel et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200039086 | Meyer | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200046434 | Graetzel | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200054405 | Schuh | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200054408 | Schuh et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200055084 | Tian et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200060516 | Baez | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200078103 | Duindam | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200085516 | DeFonzo et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200093549 | Chin | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200093554 | Schuh | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200100845 | Julian | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200100853 | Ho | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200100855 | Leparmentier | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200101264 | Jiang | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200107894 | Wallace | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200121502 | Kintz | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200146769 | Eyre | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200155084 | Walker | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200170630 | Wong | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200170720 | Ummalaneni | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200171660 | Ho et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200188043 | Yu | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200197112 | Chin | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200206472 | Ma | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200217733 | Lin | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200222134 | Schuh | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200237458 | DeFonzo | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200261172 | Romo | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200268459 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200268460 | Tse | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200281787 | Ruiz | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200297437 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200297444 | Camarillo et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200305983 | Yampolsky et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200305989 | Schuh et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200305992 | Schuh et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200315717 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200315723 | Hassan et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200323596 | Moll et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200330167 | Romo et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200345216 | Jenkins | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200352420 | Graetzel et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200360183 | Mvarez et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200367726 | Landey et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200367981 | Ho et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200375678 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101147676 | Mar 2008 | CN |
| 101222882 | Jul 2008 | CN |
| 102316817 | Jan 2012 | CN |
| 102458295 | May 2012 | CN |
| 102946801 | Feb 2013 | CN |
| 102973317 | Mar 2013 | CN |
| 103705307 | Apr 2014 | CN |
| 103735313 | Apr 2014 | CN |
| 103813748 | May 2014 | CN |
| 104758066 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 105559850 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105559886 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105611881 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105611881 | May 2016 | CN |
| 106455908 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106821498 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 104931059 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 3 025 630 | Jun 2016 | EP |
| 2001000448 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2016529062 | Sep 2016 | JP |
| 10-2014-0009359 | Jan 2014 | KR |
| 2569699 | Nov 2015 | RU |
| WO 05087128 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2006051523 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 09097461 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 15089013 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2016077419 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2017036774 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 17048194 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 17066108 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| 2017081821 | May 2017 | WO |
| 2017146890 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 17167754 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ciuti et al., 2012, Intra-operative monocular 30 reconstruction for image-guided navigation in active locomotion capsule endoscopy. Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob), 4th IEEE Ras & Embs International Conference on IEEE. |
| Fallavollita et al., 2010, Acquiring multiview C-arm images to assist cardiac ablation procedures, EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, vol. 2010, Article ID 871408, pp. 1-10. |
| Kumar et al., 2014, Stereoscopic visualization of laparoscope image using depth information from 3D model, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 113(3):862-868. |
| Livatino et al., 2015, Stereoscopic visualization and 3-D technologies in medical endoscopic teleoperation, IEEE. |
| Luo et al., 2010, Modified hybrid bronchoscope tracking based on sequential monte carlo sampler: Dynamic phantom validation, Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
| Mourgues et al., 2002, Flexible calibration of actuated stereoscopic endoscope for overlay inrobot assisted surgery, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
| Nadeem et al., 2016, Depth Reconstruction and Computer-Aided Polyp Detection in Optical Colonoscopy Video Frames, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.01329. |
| Point Cloud, Sep. 10, 2010, Wikipedia, 2 pp. |
| Racadio et al., Dec. 2007, Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite, AJR, 189:W357-W364. |
| Sato et al., 2016, Techniques of stapler-based navigational thoracoscopic segmentectomy using virtual assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP), Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8(Suppl 9):S716. |
| Shen et al., 2015, Robust camera localisation with depth reconstruction for bronchoscopic navigation. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 10(6):801-813. |
| Solheim et al., May 14, 2009, Navigated resection of giant intracranial meningiomas based on intraoperative 3D ultrasound, Acta Neurochir, 151:1143-1151. |
| Song et al., 2012, Autonomous and stable tracking of endoscope instrument tools with monocular camera, Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2012 IEEE-ASME International Conference on. IEEE. |
| Verdaasdonk et al., Jan. 23, 2013, Effect of microsecond pulse length and tip shape on explosive bubble formation of 2.78 μm Er,Cr;YSGG and 2.94 μm Er:YAG laser, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8221, 12. |
| Yip et al., 2012, Tissue tracking and registration for image-guided surgery, IEEE transactions on medical imaging 31(11):2169-2182. |
| Zhou et al., 2010, Synthesis of stereoscopic views from monocular endoscopic videos, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on IEEE. |
| Haigron et al., 2004, Depth-map-based scene analysis for active navigation in virtual angioscopy, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(11):1380-1390. |
| Mayo Clinic, Robotic Surgery, https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/robotic-surgery/about/pac-20394974?p=1, downloaded from the internet on Jul. 12, 2018, 2 pp. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2018 in application No. PCT/US18/25218. |
| Wilson et al., 2008, a buyer's guide to electromagnetic tracking systems for clinical applications, Proc. of SPCI, 6918:69182B-1 p. 6918B-11. |
| Konen et al., 1998, The VN-project: endoscopic image processing for neurosurgery, Computer Aided Surgery, 3:1-6. |
| Shi et al., Sep. 14-18, 2014, Simultaneous catheter and environment modeling for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2024-2029. |
| Vemuri et al., Dec. 2015, Inter-operative biopsy site relocations in endoluminal surgery, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, <10.1109/TBME.2015.2503981>. <hal-01230752>. |
| Kiraly et al, 2002, Three-dimensional Human Airway Segmentation Methods for Clinical Virtual Bronchoscopy, Acad Radiol, 9:1153-1168. |
| Kiraly et al., Sep. 2004, Three-dimensional path planning for virtual bronchoscopy, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(9):1365-1379. |
| Solomon et al., Dec. 2000, Three-dimensional CT-Guided Bronchoscopy With a Real-Time Electromagnetic Position Sensor A Comparison of Two Image Registration Methods, Chest, 118(6):1783-1787. |
| Al-Ahmad et al., dated 2005, Early experience with a computerized robotically controlled catheter system, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 12:199-202. |
| Gutierrez et al., Mar. 2008, A practical global distortion correction method for an image intensifier based x-ray fluoroscopy system, Med. Phys, 35(3):997-1007. |
| Hansen Medical, Inc. 2005, System Overview, product brochure, 2 pp., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/system.aspx on Jul. 14, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
| Hansen Medical, Inc. Bibliography, product brochure, 1 p., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/bibliography.aspx on Jul. 14, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
| Hansen Medical, Inc. dated 2007, Introducing the Sensei Robotic Catheter System, product brochure, 10 pp. |
| Hansen Medical, Inc. dated 2009, Sensei X Robotic Catheter System, product brochure, 5 pp. |
| Hansen Medical, Inc. Technology Advantages, product brochure, 1 p., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/advantages.aspx on Jul. 13, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
| Marrouche et al., dated May 6, 2005, AB32-1, Preliminary human experience using a novel robotic catheter remote control, Heart Rhythm, 2(5):S63. |
| Oh et al., dated May 2005, P5-75, Novel robotic catheter remote control system: safety and accuracy in delivering RF Lesions in all 4 cardiac chambers, Heart Rhythm, 2(5):S277-S278. |
| Reddy et al., May 2005, P1-53. Porcine pulmonary vein ablation using a novel robotic catheter control system and real-time integration of CT imaging with electroanatomical mapping, Hearth Rhythm, 2(5):S121. |
| Slepian, dated 2010, Robotic Catheter Intervention: the Hansen Medical Sensei Robot Catheter System, PowerPoint presentation, 28 pp. |
| CN Office action for appl No. 201880001545, dated Oct. 20, 2020, 30 pages. |
| CN office action for appl No. 201880001545, dated Jul. 20, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Anant et al., Dec. 2015, Inter-operative biopsy site relocations in endoluminal surgery, IEEETransactions on Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,<10.1109/TBME.2015 2503981>, 12 pages. |
| Mourgues et al., 2002, Flexible calibration of actuated stereoscopic endoscope for overlay in robot assisted surgery, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Sorinqer, Berlin, Heidelberq, 10 pages. |
| Advisory action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,069, dated Oct. 30, 2020, 3 pages. |
| Bell et al., 2014, Six DOF motion estimation for teleoperated flexible endoscopes using optical flow: a comparative study, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 8 pages. |
| International search report and written opinion dated Aug. 8, 2019 for PCT/US2019/034304, 14 pages. |
| Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,069, dated Apr. 14, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,069, dated Jul. 28, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,069, dated Jan. 7, 2020, 32 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,069, dated Jul. 28, 2020, 24 pages. |
| Ren et al., 2011, Multisensor data fusion in an integrated tracking system for endoscopic surgery, IEEE Transactions an Information Technology in Biomedicine, 16(1):106-111. |
| Wilson et al., 2008, a buyer's guide to electromagnetic tracking systems for clinical applications, Proc. of SPCI, 6918:691828-1 p. 69188-11, 12 pages. |
| EP Search report for appl No. 18778077, dated Jan. 20, 2021,3 page. |
| EP written opinion for appl No. 18778077, dated Jan. 20, 2021, 4 page. |
| EP Search Report for appl No. 19810872.2, dated Feb. 4, 2022, 12 pages. |
| JP Search Report for Appl. No. 2019553011, dated Jan. 13, 2022, 14 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,069, dated Mar. 7, 2022, 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,069, dated Nov. 17, 2021, 5 pages. |
| JP Office Action for appl. No. 2019553011, dated Apr. 11, 2022, 4 pages. |
| KR Office Action for appl. No. 1020187028219, dated Mar. 31, 2022, 1 page. |
| Office Action for KR Appl. No. 1020187028219, dated Sep. 19, 2022, 2 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Refusal for JP Appl. No. 2019-553011, dated Aug. 29, 2022, 3 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180279852 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62480257 | Mar 2017 | US |
