The present application claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2008 012 306.4, filed on Mar. 3, 2008, and German Patent Application No. 10 2008 017 289.8, filed on Apr. 4, 2008, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a measuring device with adaptable operation and a method for adapting the operation of a measuring device.
Discussion of the Background
In computer technology, dialog editors are widely available. Within very narrow limits, a retrospective modification of dialog functionalities of adaptable menu options, for example, in standard text-processing software, is known. However, in this context, only a selection from a few rigidly preset, placeable buttons is provided. The provision of a dialog structure is not possible.
The German Patent Application No. DE 102 02 501 A1 describes a dialog system, which can be adapted retrospectively. However, this dialog system is not related to a measuring device. Moreover, here also, adaptation is possible only separately from the use of the dialog system. In this context, the software must first be re-compiled after the adaptation, in order to be used again.
Embodiments of the present invention advantageously provide a method for adapting the operation of a measuring device and a measuring device, which can be adapted in its operation, which are characterized by great flexibility while guaranteeing a logical overview.
The measuring device according to the invention provides a display device. The operation of the measuring device can be adapted. In this context, the operation consists of the input and output of parameters in dialogs and the switching between dialogs. The display device displays the dialogs. The display device can display several dialogs simultaneously. The input of given values into given dialogs effects the opening and/or closing of at least one respectively associated further dialog. The content and/or the position and/or the form and/or the linking of the dialogs are adapted. The operation of the measuring device is functional during the adaptation. Exclusively the currently-displayed dialogs are adaptable. Accordingly, a simple, intuitive adaptation of the operation of the measuring device is guaranteed. As a result of the functionality of operation during the adaptation, different operating conditions can be included and adapted in a targeted manner.
The dialog is preferably a combination of input fields and/or output fields in an enclosed region of the display device. A dialog can preferably contain at least one further subordinate dialog. This guarantees a flexible design of the user surface and a simple and intuitive operation.
The display device preferably displays text and/or graphics by means of output fields. The user enters numerical values and/or texts and/or selects preferably preset entries preferably by means of input fields. Accordingly, a flexible operation and an adaptation of the measuring device and a high information content of the dialogs are provided.
The measuring device advantageously also provides a processing device and a databank. By preference, the processing device stores the parameters and dialogs in a databank. This guarantees the latest update status of the parameters and the dialogs during operation and adaptation.
Furthermore, the measuring device preferably provides a processing device. Upon the input of a parameter in a dialog, the processing device advantageously automatically updates the displayed dialogs and preferably automatically opens and/or closes associated dialogs. This guarantees simple operation, so that manual updating is not necessary.
The values of the parameters, which are entered in a dialog, are preferably available in all further dialogs, in which the parameters are displayed. Consistency of the parameters and accordingly a high level of accuracy in operation is therefore attainable.
The display device preferably displays several dialogs side-by-side and/or one above the other and/or superimposed. This guarantees a high information content of the display.
The display device preferably displays the dialogs with an adjustable degree of transparency. Accordingly, for example, graphics can be built up from several superimposed graphics components. This provides an increase in flexibility while reducing complexity.
By way of example, the invention is described below with reference to drawings, which illustrate an advantageous exemplary embodiment of the invention. The drawings are as follows:
Initially, the functioning of dialogs according to embodiments of the invention and of the measuring device according to the invention will be explained with reference to
The subordinate dialog 3 contains five input fields 13, 15, 18, 19 of different types and one subordinate dialog 14. The input field 13 is a drop-down menu like the input fields 10, 11. The signal type of the trigger signal can be selected via this input field. The input field 15 is checkbox like the input field 12. By activating this input field 15, an additional, subordinate dialog is opened, by means of which trigger logic can be added. The input fields 18, 19 are text input fields. In this context, the text is limited to numerical values. These numerical values can additionally be restricted to given numerical ranges. In this case, the levels, for example, voltages, of the trigger levels and the hysteresis are entered.
The input field 21 consists of three selection buttons. By selecting one of the buttons, the corresponding slope of the trigger signal is selected. The output fields 16, 17 are used to explain the function of the associated input fields 18, 19. The subordinate dialog 14 displays the selected signal type for the trigger signal in a graphic output field. Dependent upon the selected setting of the input field 13, a different graphic is displayed here.
The subordinate dialog 4 provides further input fields 20 for controlling the measuring device. The respective function will not be described in greater detail here.
In this context, the individual dialogs and their form are stored in a databank 103. System parameters, such as the trigger type just selected, are stored there. If a system parameter is modified, the modification is stored in the databank 103.
The subordinate dialog 50 contains four input fields 51, 52, 54, 55 and a subordinate dialog 53. In this context, the input field 51, like the input field 21 from
The subordinate dialog 53 contains only one graphic element, which explains the meaning of the input fields 54 and 55. Alternatively, two superimposed subordinate dialogs 53, which are displayed in a partially transparent manner and each contain part of the graphic element, are displayed at this position of the subordinate dialog 50. Detailed reference to this alternative is provided in the context of
In a selection menu 60, it is possible to choose, for example, input fields and output fields and further dialogs from a list 65 of possible dialog elements stored in the databank 103. The list 65 is sorted according to categories via the buttons 67. Settings for the respective element can be determined in a configuration menu 61. For example, the display type of the trigger-type selection is determined via a drop-down menu 63. The currently-selected element and its display, in the present context, the trigger type in a further drop-down menu 64, are displayed directly at this position in a preview display. Following this, the respective element is positioned in the corresponding dialog.
During positioning, the final view of the element is already displayed at the respective position. In this context, only the directly-activated dialog can be modified in each case. The active dialog can be set by selecting the respective dialog from the dialogs displayed. It is not possible to modify dialogs, which are not displayed. In order to adapt dialogs, which are not displayed, it is necessary first to display them. Since the functionality of the dialogs is also provided in any case with the dialog editor open, the dialogs displayed can simply be switched. This is particularly advantageous, because it guarantees considerable intuitiveness in the adaptation. Adaptations always relate to currently-set dialogs. Accidental adaptation of the incorrect dialog is therefore prevented. Accordingly, the amendment of system parameters, such as the trigger type from “edge” to “glitch”, automatically leads to the display of the setting dialog for the “glitch” trigger, as illustrated in
The invention is not restricted to the exemplary embodiment presented. As already mentioned, the invention can be realised by means of different measuring devices, such as oscilloscopes or network analysers. An expansion of the adjustable dialog options beyond those shown here is also conceivable. All of the features described above or illustrated in the drawings can be combined with one another as required within the framework of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 012 306 | Mar 2008 | DE | national |
10 2008 017 289 | Apr 2008 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5155836 | Jordan | Oct 1992 | A |
5371851 | Pieper | Dec 1994 | A |
5517105 | Holzwarth | May 1996 | A |
5742276 | Taraki | Apr 1998 | A |
5841959 | Guiremand | Nov 1998 | A |
5861882 | Sprenger | Jan 1999 | A |
5953009 | Alexander | Sep 1999 | A |
6229536 | Alexander | May 2001 | B1 |
6239796 | Alexander | May 2001 | B1 |
6320577 | Alexander | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327544 | Samuels | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6518744 | Tallman | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522345 | Alexander | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525525 | Azinger | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6564368 | Beckett | May 2003 | B1 |
6567760 | Kikuchi | May 2003 | B1 |
6570592 | Sajdak | May 2003 | B1 |
6639607 | Ferguson | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6690398 | Beck | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697754 | Alexander | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707474 | Beck | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714883 | Samuels | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6937237 | McCarthy | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6965383 | Ritter | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7013430 | Jaffe | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7079140 | Boehler | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7210117 | Kudukoli | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7373263 | Cohn | May 2008 | B2 |
7403560 | Gamper | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7533347 | Santori | May 2009 | B2 |
7624375 | Santori | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650589 | Cifra | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7725874 | Kornerup et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7853339 | Miller | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7929461 | Ramesh | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7953767 | Shaburov | May 2011 | B2 |
8195413 | Freidhof | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8201077 | Reddy | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8271943 | Hudson, III | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8365086 | Grace | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8387002 | Dellas | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8676357 | Boercsoek | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8825183 | Hammack | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20010019338 | Roth | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020055834 | Andrade | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075267 | Cake | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020171682 | Frank et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030037322 | Kodosky et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030058280 | Molinari | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030107595 | Ciolfi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040204886 | Rieger | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040246001 | Sontag et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255269 | Santori | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050039162 | Cifra | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050062461 | Srikrishna et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066285 | Santori et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050228608 | Wells | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060053408 | Kornerup et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070132779 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090125130 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132996 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090210826 | Sierer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090327942 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100222902 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102 02 501 | Jul 2003 | DE |
1 359 426 | Nov 2003 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090222771 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |