RXR homodimer formation

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The vitamin A metabolite all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) and its natural and synthetic derivatives (retinoids) exert a broad range of biological effects.sup.1,2. Clinically, retinoids are important therapeutics in the treatment of skin diseases and cancers.sup.3-6. Understanding how the multitude of retinoid actions can be mediated at the molecular level has been greatly enhanced by the cloning and characterization of specific nuclear receptors, the retinoic acid receptors (RARs).sup.7-12 and the retinoid X receptors (RXRs).sup.13-17. RARs and RXRs are part of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily.sup.18,19. Both types of receptors are encoded by three distinct genes, .alpha., .beta., and .gamma., from which, in the case of RARs, multiple isoforms can be generated.sup.20-22. Interestingly, while RARs are specific to vertebrates, the RXRs have been well conserved from Drosophila to man.sup.17,23. Despite the considerable advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of retinoid receptor action in recent years, a central question of whether distinct molecular pathways for naturally occurring retinoids exist has not yet been answered. The recent observation that the RA stereoisomer 9-cis-RA binds with high affinity to RXRs.sup.23,24 suggested a retinoid response pathway distinct from that of all-trans-RA. However, it was almost simultaneously discovered by several laboratories that RARs require interaction with auxiliary receptors for effective DNA binding and function and that RXRs are such auxiliary receptors.sup.15,16,26-29. Hence, RARs appear to function effectively only as heterodimeric RAR/RXR complexes, or in combination with comparable auxiliary proteins that still need to be identified. Similarly, RXRs were shown to require RARs, thyroid hormone receptors (TRs), or Vitamin D.sub.3 receptors (VDRs) for effective DNA binding.sup.15,16,26-29. Thus, from these DNA binding studies, RXRs appeared to be able to function predominantly if not exclusively as auxiliary receptors, thereby playing a crucial role in generating a high degree of diversity and specificity of transcriptional controls and mediating the highly pleiotropic effects of different hormones by increasing DNA affinity and specificity for at least 3 different classes of ligand-activated receptors.
Contrary to these findings, the present invention provides that RXRs form homodimers. The invention provides that these homodimers effectively bind to specific response elements in the absence of auxiliary receptors and their DNA binding specificity is distinct from that of the RXR containing heterodimers. The invention demonstrates a novel mechanism for retinoid action by which a ligand induced-homodimer mediates a distinct retinoid response pathway. Additionally, ligands are provided which selectively activate RXR homodimer formation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a method of screening a substance for the ability to affect the formation of a retinoid X receptor homodimer comprising combining the substance and a solution containing retinoid X receptors and determining the presence of homodimer formation. Also provided is a method of screening a substance for an effect on a retinoid X receptor homodimer's ability to bind DNA comprising combining the substance with the homodimer and determining the effect of the compound on the homodimer's ability to bind DNA. A method of inhibiting an activity of a retinoid X receptor heterodimer comprising increasing the formation of a retinoid X receptor homodimer, thereby preventing the retinoid X receptor from forming a heterodimer and preventing the resulting heterodimer activity is also provided. A method of inhibiting an activity of a retinoid X receptor homodimer is also provided. A method of determining an increased probability of a pathology associated with retinoid X receptor homodimer formation and treating such pathology are further provided. In addition, a method of screening a response element for binding with a retinoid X receptor homodimer is provided. Finally, the invention provides methods of activating retinoid X receptor homodimer formation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1a and 1b show that 9-cis-retinoic acid induces RXR homodimer binding on TREpal. (a) In vitro synthesized RXR.alpha. was incubated either with (+) or without (-) indicated hormones (10.sup.-7 M 9-cis-RA; 10.sup.-6 M RA; 10.sup.-6 M T.sub.3) in the presence or absence of in vitro synthesized TR.alpha. or RAR.beta. for 30 min at room temperature. After this preincubation, the reaction mixtures were analyzed by gel retardation assay using .sup.32 P-labeled TREpal as probe. Lane 1 represents the nonspecific binding of unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. Open triangles indicate the nonspecific complex observed with unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. Solid triangles indicate the specific TR.alpha.-RXR.alpha. heterodimer binding. Arrows indicate specific RXR.alpha. homodimer binding. The RXR.alpha./RAR.beta. heterodimer migrates at the same position as the RXR.alpha. homodimer. For comparison, the effect of 9-cis-RA on RAR.beta. binding is shown.
(b) To determine that 9-cis-RA induced DNA binding complex contains RXR.alpha. protein, Flag-RXR.alpha. (F-RXR), an RXR.alpha. derivative that contains an eight-amino-acid epitope (Flag) at its amino terminal end which can be recognized by a specific anti-Flag monoclonal antibody, was constructed. In vitro synthesized F-RXR.alpha. was incubated either with (+) or without (-) 10.sup.-7 M 9-cis-RA in the presence of either specific anti-Flag antibody (.alpha.F) or nonspecific preimmune serum (NI) for 30 min at room temperature. The effect of anti-Flag antibody on F-RXR.alpha. binding in the presence of 9-cis-RA was then analyzed by gel retardation assay using .sup.32 P-labeled TREpal as a probe. Lane 1 represents the nonspecific binding of unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate (open triangles). Arrows indicate the specific F-RXR.alpha. homodimer and RAR-RXR heterodimer binding. Diamonds indicate the anti-Flag antibody up-shifted F-RXR homodimer.
FIGS. 2a through 2c show the characterization of 9-cis-RA induced RXR homodimer on TREpal.
(a) Cooperative binding of 9-cis-RA induced RXR.alpha. homodimer. Formation of RXR-DNA complex at different receptor concentrations in the absence or presence of 10.sup.-7 M 9-cis-RA was analyzed by gel retardation assay using labeled TREpal as probe. Open triangle indicates the nonspecific binding of an unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. Arrows indicate the specific RXR binding complex.
(b) Quantitation of the RXR binding complex at different receptor concentrations in the presence of 9-cis-RA. Gel slices containing RXR binding complex in the presence of 9-cis-RA shown in FIG. 2(a) were excised and counted in a scintillation counter and plotted.
(c) 9-cis-RA concentration-dependent binding of RXR homodimer on TREpal. Equal amounts of in vitro synthesized RXR protein were incubated with indicated concentrations of 9-cis-RA. The reaction mixtures were then analyzed by gel retardation assay using labeled TREpal as a probe. Open triangles indicate the nonspecific binding of unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. Arrows indicate the specific RXR binding complex.
FIGS. 3a and 3b show that 9-cis-RA induces RXR homodimer binding on RXR-specific response elements.
(a) Nuclear receptor binding elements used in this study (SEQ ID NOS: 11, 2 to 7, 9, 8 and 10, respectively. These oligonucleotides were synthesized with appropriate restriction sites at both ends as indicated by the small letters. Sequences that are closely related to the AGG/TTCA motif are indicated by arrows.
(b) The effect of 9-cis-RA on RXR homodimer binding of ApoAI-RARE or CRBPII-RARE was analyzed essentially as described in FIG. 1a. Lane 1 represents the nonspecific binding of unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate, which are indicated by the open triangles. Solid triangles indicate the RAR/RXR heterodimer complex. Arrows indicate the specific RXR binding complex.
FIGS. 4a and 4c show the response element specific binding of RXR homodimer. The effect of 9-cis-RA on RXR binding on RA specific response elements (a), T.sub.3 specific response elements (b), or estrogen specific response element (c) was analyzed by gel retardation assays as described in FIG. 1a. For comparison, the binding of RXR/RAR heterodimer (a), RXR/TR heterodimer (b) or estrogen receptor (c) is shown. Open triangles indicate the nonspecific binding of unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. Solid triangle indicates the RAR/RXR heterodimer complex (a), TR/RXR heterodimer complex (b) or ER complexes (c).
FIG. 5 shows RXR homodimerization occurs in solution. .sup.35 S-labeled in vitro synthesized RXR.alpha. proteins were incubated with partially purified bacterially expressed Flag-RXR (F-RXR) (+) or similarly prepared glutathione transferase control protein (-) either in the presence or absence of response elements or chemical cross-linker DSP as indicated. After incubation, either anti-Flag antibody (F) or nonspecific preimmune serum (NI) was added. 10.sup.-7 M 9-cis-RA was maintained during working process. The immune complexes were washed in the presence of 10.sup.-7 M-cis-RA, boiled in SDS sample buffer and separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE. The .sup.35 S-labeled in vitro synthesized RXR.alpha. protein is shown in the right panel.
FIGS. 6a to 6d show the transcriptional activation of RXR and RAR.alpha.: RXR heterodimers by 9-cis-RA on natural response elements. CV-1 cells were cotransfected with 100 ng of the reporter plasmids (a) TREpal-tk-CAT (b) .beta.RARE-tk-CAT (c) ApoAI-RARE-tk-CAT and (d) CRBPI-RARE-tk-CAT and 5 ng of empty pECE expression vector, pECE-RXR.alpha., pECE RAR.alpha. or combination of both as indicated. Transfected cells were treated with no hormone (open bars), 10.sup.-7 M RA (shadowed bars) or 10.sup.-7 M 9-cis-RA (dark shadowed bars). The results of a representative experiment performed in duplicate are shown.
FIGS. 7a and 7b show the RXR.alpha.-dependent transactivation of reporter constructs (a) TREpal-tk-CAT (10) or (b) CRBPII-tk-CAT (10) by 9-cis-RA or retinoids SR11203, SR11217, SR11234, SR11235, SR11236, and SR11237. Results of a representative experiment carried out four times are shown. In four independent experiments, induction profiles did not vary significantly. CAT activity was normalized for transfection and harvesting efficiency by measuring the enzymatic activity derived from the cotransfected .beta.-galactosidase expression plasmid (pCH110, Pharmacia).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a method of screening a substance for the ability to affect the formation of an RXR homodimer comprising combining the substance and a solution containing RXRs and determining the presence of a homodimer formation. The presence of homodimer formation can, for example, be determined by detecting the activation of transcription by the RXR homodimer or by coprecipitation. The affect can be the induction of homodimer formation, for example, an activity similar to that activated by 9-cis-RA or an activity which selectively activates homodimer formation over heterodimer formation. By "selectively activates" is meant a compound which activates homodimer formation but does not significantly activate heterodimers. The affect can also be the inhibition of homodimer formation. Examples of inhibition include a substance which competes for 9-cis-RA binding to the receptor but itself does not activate or induce dimerization or which binds 9-cis-RA to block its activity. Such screening of substances is routinely carried out given the subject discovery of homodimer formation. In particular assays set forth below can generally be used for screening by merely substituting the substance of interest for 9-cis-RA. A good starting point for screening such "substances" is the activity of 9-cis-RA described herein. The substituents on 9-cis-RA can be varied to make 9-cis-RA analogs and screened in the method to determine any increase or decrease in homodimer formation. However, any substance can be screened in this assay to determine any affect on homodimer formation. Such compounds can then be used to promote homodimer formation and gene transcription in a cell. A cell as used herein includes cells found either in vitro or in vivo. Thus, the compounds can be administered to a human subject to effect RXR homodimer formation and promote transcription of a gene activated by an RXR homodimer. Such compounds are set forth in the Examples.
The data set forth herein utilizes RXR.alpha.. However, given the high homology between RXR.alpha., .beta.and .gamma., each protein should form homodimers and have the activity described for RXR.alpha. homodimers. Relatedly, homodimers can form between different RXRs. For example, homodimers can form between RXR.alpha. and RXR.beta. or between RXR.beta. and RXR.gamma. or between RXR.alpha. and RXR.gamma.. The activity of these homodimers can be confirmed using the methods set forth herein.
The invention also provides a method of screening a substance for an effect on an RXR homodimer's ability to bind DNA comprising combining the substance with the homodimer and determining the effect of the compound on the homodimer's ability to bind DNA. For example, compounds which might bind the homodimer or bind the DNA response element recognized by an RXR homodimer can be screened in this method.
The invention further provides a method of inhibiting an activity of an RXR-containing heterodimer comprising increasing the formation of an RXR homodimer, thereby preventing the RXR from forming a heterodimer and preventing the resulting heterodimer activity. The activity can be any activity but is generally the activation or repression of transcription. The activity can be blocked, for example, by utilizing RXRs to form homodimers which otherwise would be available to form heterodimers. Since the number of heterodimers are decreased, the activity of the heterodimers is decreased. In one example, the RXR heterodimer is comprised of thyroid hormone receptor and RXR. The activity of the RXR/TR heterodimer was decreased. Other heterodimers can be tested using standard methods given the teaching set forth herein.
The invention also provides a method of inhibiting an activity of an RXR receptor homodimer comprising preventing the formation of the RXR homodimer. Such inhibition can be obtained, for example, by inhibiting 9-cis-RA or the transcription or activation by 9-cis-RA. The activity inhibited is generally the activation or repression of transcription.
The invention also provides a method of inhibiting an activity of an RXR homodimer comprising preventing the binding of the RXR homodimer to its response element. For example, the activity of a receptor which competes for the same response element can be promoted.
In general, the activity which is inhibited is the activation or repression of transcription.
The invention still further provides a method of determining an increased probability of a pathology associated with RXR homodimer formation comprising detecting a modulation of RXR homodimer formation in the subject when compared to a normal subject. The modulation can be an increase or a decrease in homodimer formation. Such a modulation can result, for example, from a mutated RXR. The decrease can be detected by an assay for the homodimers in a sample or by detecting mutations known to decrease homodimer formation.
Relatedly, the invention provides a method of treating a pathology associated with RXR homodimer formation in a subject comprising modulating homodimer formation in the subject. The modulation can be an increase or a decrease depending on the pathology. Such an increase can be accomplished, for example, utilizing compounds which promote RXR transcription. The pathology can be associated with the skin, e.g., acne and psoriasis. In addition, the pathology can be a cancer. The exact amount of such compounds required will vary from subject to subject, depending on the species, age, and general condition of the subject, the severity of the disease that is being treated, the particular compound used, its mode of administration, and the like. Thus, it is not possible to specify an exact activity promoting amount. However, an appropriate amount may be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art using only routine experimentation given the teachings herein.
The invention also provides a purified RXR homodimer. By "purified" is meant free of at least some of the cellular components associated with RXR homodimers in a natural environment.
Finally, the invention provides a method of screening a response element for binding with a RXR homodimer comprising combining the response element with the RXR homodimer and detecting the presence of binding. The presence of binding can be determined by a number of standard methods. In one method, binding is detected by the transcriptional activation of a marker which is operably linked to the response element. By "operably linked" is meant the marker can be transcribed in the presence of the transcriptional activator.
The invention grows out of our study of the effects of the natural vitamin A derivative 9-cis-RA on retinoid receptor DNA binding and transcriptional activation. In contrast to all-trans-RA, the 9-cis analog dramatically enhances RXR.alpha. binding at 10.sup.-9 to 10.sup.-8 M concentrations to several RXR-specific RAREs but not to natural TREs or the ERE. The effect is specific to RXR since 9-cis-RA did not induce binding of RAR.alpha., .beta. or .gamma. to response elements (FIG. 1, FIG. 3). Judging from the migration pattern in the gel shift assays, we assume that 9-cis-RA induces homodimer formation, although a larger complex containing an RXR trimer or tetramer can occur (particularly in the case of the CRBPII-RARE). Such trimer or tetramer formation can be tested using the methods set forth herein.
RXR.alpha. homodimers exert response element specificity distinct from heterodimers. The rCRBPI response element did not interact with RXR homodimers, while the CRBPII response element, the only natural RARE identified so far that contains perfect repeats, was a strong binder of 9-cis-RA induced RXR.alpha. homodimers. It has been shown previously that this response element is well activated by RXR.alpha..sup.24,30. Although this response element is also bound effectively by the RXR.alpha. -RAR.alpha. heterodimer (FIG. 3).sup.27,29, the heterodimer appears to have a repressor function.sup.30.
The results obtained with the transcriptional activation studies agree well with the DNA binding studies although CV-1 cells, like all other mammalian tissue culture cells tested, contain endogenous retinoid receptors that can partially obscure effects. Nonetheless, response elements that strongly bind 9-cis-RA-RXR.alpha. homodimers also responded strongly to cotransfected RXR.alpha. in the presence of 9-cis-RA, whereas response elements that did not bind well to RXR.alpha. homodimers, like the rCRBPI-RARE or the MHC-TRE, could not be activated by RXR.alpha. alone.
It is generally believed that the dimerization--homodimerization or heterodimerization--of nuclear hormone receptors is critical for high affinity interaction of the receptors with their cognate response elements. RXRs exist mainly as monomer in solution.sup.16 and require high concentrations or the presence of RARs, TRs or VDR to display effective DNA binding activity .sup.13,15,16, .sup.26-30. The observation of the enhanced cooperative RXR DNA binding activity in the presence of 9-cis-RA demonstrates that 9-cis-RA induced the formation of RXR homodimers which have an increased affinity for DNA. Thus, binding of 9-cis-RA to RXR can induce a conformational change, which allows homodimerization to occur. It is interesting that although 9-cis-RA and RA can bind to RAR,.sup.24,25 they do not induce RAR homodimer formation.
RXR.alpha. homodimer formation can occur in solution in the absence of DNA. Thus, when 9-cis-RA becomes available to cells, the equilibrium between monomeric and dimeric receptors is changed and an additional species, the RXR homodimer can be formed, allowing for novel response pathways. The concept of ligand-induced homodimer binding as observed by in vitro gel shift assay has not been previously observed for nuclear receptors with the exception of a mutated estrogen receptor (ER-val-400).sup.43,44.
For the related TRs, a ligand effect has been reported on homodimer binding, 45,46 however the ligand (T3) reduced homodimer response element interaction. Since the carboxy terminal half of TRs and RARs encodes both ligand as well as dimerization functions.sup.35,45,47, the strong effect of the ligand on dimerization as observed here is not completely surprising. However, the specificity of the effect is quite dramatic since only homodimer but not heterodimer formation appears to be affected. An overall picture emerges where the carboxy terminal region of a receptor through its intermixed domains (that also includes a transcriptional activation region).sup.49 allows for multiple activities of individual receptors that may also include interactions with other regulatory proteins.sup.49.
The data presented in this application clearly demonstrate the central role of the RXRs, having dual functions that allow them to act as auxiliary receptors for three classes of hormone receptors, the RARs, TRs and VDRs through heterodimerization. The two functions of RXR--homodimerization and heterodimerization--represent two distinct transcriptional regulatory controls that can be expected to affect distinct physiological processes. Thus, 9-cis-RA can have therapeutic properties distinct from that of all-trans-RA.
EXAMPLE I
Identification of Homodimer Formation
9-cis-RA induces RXR homodimer binding on the TREpal
Although RXRs have been shown to bind RA response elements (RAREs) when used at high concentrations,.sup.28,30,31 more recent investigations revealed that RXR exists mainly as monomers in solution.sup.10 and that effective DNA interaction requires heterodimer formation with RARs or TRs or VDR.sup.15,16,26-29. Binding of the heterodimers to a variety of response elements was found to be ligand independents.sup.32. The newly discovered natural RA isomer, 9-cis-RA, has been reported to be an effective activator of RXRs in Drosophila Schneider cells that are known to contain neither RAR nor TRs.sup.17,24. If 9-cis-RA is indeed a true ligand for RXRs, one might expect that this ligand modulates RXR response element interaction. We therefore investigated the effect of 9-cis-RA on RXR.alpha. binding to the palindromic TRE (TREpal), an RXR responsive element.sup.14, in the absence and presence of coreceptors (TRs and RARs).
The cloning of the receptor cDNAs for RXR.alpha., RAR.beta., or TR.alpha. into the pBluescript (Stratagene, San Diego, Calif.) have been described previously.sup.26. Flag-RXR.alpha. was constructed as described previously.sup.33 by ligation of a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing an ATG codon and a DNA sequence encoding Flag (Arg-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys) �SEQ ID NO:1! to the N-terminus of RXR.alpha.. The fusion product was then cloned into pBluescript. The synthesis of receptor proteins using in vitro transcription/translation system and gel retardation assays using synthesized receptor proteins and the double-stranded TREpal.sup.34 were as described.sup.33. 9-cis-RA (m.p. 184.degree.-187.degree. C.) was prepared from 9-cis-retinal by a two-step sequence of MnO.sub.2 oxidation in the presence of HOAc-MeOH to give the methyl ester (69%) followed by hydrolysis (80%) in 0.5N KOH in 25% aq. MeOH and crystallization (MeOH); HPLC (Novapak C.sub.18, 32% MeCN, 27% MeCH, 16% I-PrOH, 24% H.sub.2 O, 1% HOAc, 1.9 mL/min, 260 nM) t.sub.R 15.4 min (100%). To analyze the effect of hormones, the receptor proteins were incubated with appropriate concentrations of hormone at room temperature for 30 min before performing the DNA binding assay. When anti-Flag antibody (Immunex, Seattle, Wash.) was used, 1 .mu.l of the antiserum was incubated with receptor protein for another 30 min at room temperature before performing the DNA binding assay.
While in the absence of ligand, RXR alone did not bind effectively to the TREpal and required TR or RAR for response element interaction, binding of RXR was dramatically increased in the presence of 9-cis-RA (FIG. 1a) and did not require TRs or RARs. The RXR-specific band observed in the presence of 9-cis-RA was as prominent as the bands obtained with the heterodimeric TR-RXR and RAR-RXR complexes. The RXR complex migrated more slowly than the TR-RXR complex at a position very similar to that of the RAR-RXR heterodimer-TREpal complex. These data therefore-demonstrate that 9-cis-RA induces RXR homodimer formation. Due to migration of the RAR-RXR complex at the same position as the 9-cis-RA induced RXR homodimer complex, we were unable to determine in this experiment whether both complexes were formed. Remarkably, all-trans-RA when added at a concentration of 10.sup.-6 M, also induced to some degree RXR.alpha. homodimer binding whereas T.sub.3 did not. Although the RA effect could be observed with several freshly prepared RA solutions, it is not clear at this point whether this homodimer formation in the presence of RA is due to 9-cis-RA impurities in the all-trans-RA solutions used here, or is a direct effect of all-trans-RA (see below). Interestingly, although it was reported that 9-cis-RA is capable of binding to RAR.sup.24, unlike its effect on RXR, 9-cis-RA was not found to induce RAR homodimer binding to the TREpal.
To provide further evidence that the observed complex in the presence of 9-cis-RA indeed was an RXR complex, we performed the DNA binding experiment with Flag-RXR, a derivative that carries an 8 amino acid aminoterminal epitope recognized specifically by anti-Flag (.alpha.F) antibody.sup.33. As shown in FIG. 1b, .alpha.F supershifted the 9-cis-RA induced complexes, while a nonspecific antibody did not. This proves that the complex observed with the TREpal in the presence of 9-cis-RA indeed contained RXR protein. To examine how dependent the 9-cis-RA induced homodimer formation is on the concentration of RXR protein, increasing concentrations of in vitro translated RXR protein were mixed with the labeled TREpal in the presence or absence of 9-cis-RA (FIG. 2a). When these mixtures were analyzed by the gel retardation assay, a strong cooperative effect in homodimeric DNA binding was seen, positively dependent on the RXR.alpha. protein concentration (FIG. 2a,b). Although slight binding of RXR can be observed when high concentrations of RXR were used, 9-cis-RA was required for efficient complex formation at all receptor concentrations used. We further determined the concentrations of 9-cis-RA required for homodimer complex formation at all receptor concentrations used. We further determined the concentrations of 9-cis-RA required for homodimer complex formation and observed a significant effect already at 10.sup.-9 M while optimal binding was seen at 10.sup.-8 M (FIG. 2c). Thus, effective RXR homodimer DNA interaction is dependent on RXR protein concentration and can occur at low levels of 9-cis-RA.
9-cis-RA induced homodimeric interaction with specific response elements
RXR containing heterodimers have a highly specific interaction with various natural response elements in that TR-RXR heterodimers only bind strongly to TREs but not to RAREs, whereas the opposite is true for RAR-RXR heterodimers.sup.15,32. We examined the sequence requirement of DNA binding of 9-cis-RA induced RXR homodimer using a number of natural and synthetic response elements (FIG. 3a).
Gel retardation assays using in vitro synthesized receptor protein are described in the FIG. 1 legend. The following oligonucleotides and their complements were used as probes in FIGS. 3 and 4. ApoAI-RARE, a direct repeat response element with 2 bp spacer.sup.31, gatcAGGGCAGGGGTCAAGGGTTCAGTgatc �SEQ ID NO:2!; CRBPII-RARE, a direct repeat RXR-specific response element with 1 bp spacer.sup.30, gatcCAGGTCACAGGTCACAGGTCACAGTTCAAgatc �SEQ ID NO:3!; .beta.RARE, a direct repeat of RA response element present in RAR.beta. promoter.sup.35,36, gatctGTAGGGTTCACCGAAAGTTCACTCagatc �SEQ ID NO:4!; CRBPI-RARE, a direct repeat RA specific response element present in rat CRBPI promoter.sup.37, gatccAGGTCAAAAAGTCAGgatc �SEQ ID NO:5!; MHC-TRE, a direct repeat T.sub.3 specific response element present in rat .alpha.-myosin heavy chain gene.sup.39, gatcCTGGAGGTGACAGGAGGACAGCgatc �SEQ ID NO:6!; ME-TRE, a direct repeat T.sub.3 specific response element present in the rat malic enzyme genes, gatcCAGGACGTTGGGGTTAGGGGAGGACAGTGGgatc �SEQ ID NO:7!; DR-4, an idealized direct repeat T.sub.3 specific response element with 4 bp spacer.sup.38, gatcTCAGGTCATCCTCAGGTCAgatc �SEQ ID NO:8!; DR-5, an idealized direct repeat RA specific response element with 5 bp spacer.sup.38, gatcTCAGGTCATCCTCAGGTCAgatc �SEQ ID NO:9!; ERE, a perfect palindromic ER response element.sup.41, gatcTCAGGTCACTGTGACCTGAgatc �SEQ ID NO:10!. The sequence of TREpal �SEQ ID NO:11! is shown for comparison.
ApoAI-RARE (a direct repeat response element that contains a 2 bp spacer), which has been suggested to be RXR-specific.sup.31, resulted in a strong RXR complex in the presence of 9-cis-RA and to a lesser degree with RA (10.sup.-6 M). The RXR-RAR heterodimer also bound effectively to this response element. Since the heterodimer complex migrated at the same position as RXR homodimers, the effect of 9-cis-RA on RXR-RAR heterodimers cannot be clearly determined. RAR homodimer binding was not induced by 9-cis-RA (FIG. 3b). When we investigated 9-cis-RA induced RXR binding to another RXR responsive element.sup.30, the CRBPII-RARE, we observed a complex that migrated more slowly than the heterodimer (in the absence of ligand), while in the presence of 9-cis-RA and RAR, both homodimer and heterodimer binding appeared to be reduced in their intensity (FIG. 3); a similar effect was seen at high RA concentrations or when both 9-cis-RA and RA were present. 9-cis-RA also induced RXR interaction with the .beta.RARE (FIG. 4a), the RAR response element from the human RAR.beta. promoter.sup.35,36 that contains a 5 bp spacer. However, the RXR homodimer band was considerably weaker than the RAR-RXR heterodimer band at the protein concentrations used. Interestingly, another natural RARE derived from the rat CRBPI promoter.sup.37, that like the ApoAI-RARE contains a 2 bp spacer, did not show any binding of RXR in the presence of 9-cis-RA (FIG. 4a), indicating that the actual sequence of the repeated core motif is critical for RXR homodimer binding. Similarly, the DR-5-RARE, a perfect repeat element derived from the .beta.-RARE.sup.38 did not exhibit interaction with RXR in the presence of 9-cis-RA, while it interacted strongly with RXR when RARE was present (FIG. 4a).
To examine whether RXR homodimer binding is specific to certain RAREs, we also performed gel shift experiments with the T.sub.3 response elements from the rat .alpha.-myosin heavy chain promoter (MHC-TRE).sup.39, the rat malic enzyme (ME-TRE).sup.40 and the perfect repeat DR-4.sup.38. In all three cases, specific binding of RXR in the presence or absence of 9-cis-RA could not be observed, while all three response elements bound effectively TR/RXR heterodimers (FIG. 4b), consistent with the notion that these elements are not induced by retinoids. Similarly, the perfect palindromic ERE.sup.41 also did not interact with RXR homodimers (FIG. 4c).
9-cis-RA induced homodimer formation occurs in the absence of DNA
It was reported the RXR exists mainly as monomer in solution.sup.16. An important question is whether 9-cis-RA induced RXR homodimers, like the RXR containing heterodimers, can form in solution in the absence of DNA. To address this question we took advantage of the Flag-RXR derivative that can be specifically precipitated with anti-Flag antibody while RXR wild type cannot.
Flag-RXR.alpha. was cloned in frame in the expression vector pGex 2T (Pharmacia) and was expressed in bacteria using the procedure provided by the manufacturer. Protein was partially purified on a prepacked glutathione sepharose 48 column (Pharmacia) and tested for its function by gel retardation assays and western blotting using anti-Flag antibody. Immunocoprecipitation assay was performed essentially as described.sup.26. Briefly, 10 .mu.l of .sup.35 S-labeled in vitro synthesized RXR.alpha. protein was incubated with 5 .mu.l (approximately 0.1 .mu.g) of partially purified bacterially expressed Flag-RXR.alpha. fusion protein or similarly prepared glutathione transferase control protein in 100 .mu.l buffer containing 10.sup.-7 M 9-cis-RA, 50 mM KCl and 10% glycerol for 30 min at room temperature. When assayed in the presence of chemical cross-linker or oligonucleotides, we added 2 .mu.l of 100 mM dithiobis succinimidylpropionate (DSP) dissolved in DMSO or 10 ng of oligonucleotide and continued the incubation at room temperature for 15 min. The reaction mixtures were then incubated with 1 .mu.l of anti-Flag antibody or nonspecific preimmune serum for 2 h on ice. Immune complexes were precipitated by adding 50 .mu.l of protein-A-sepharose slurry and mixing continuously in the cold room for 1 h. The immune complexes were washed extensively with cold NET-N buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.5% NP-40) containing 10.sup.-7 M 9-cis-RA, boiled in SDS sample buffer and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The gel was fixed, dried and visualized by autoradiography.
When we mixed Flag-RXR with in vitro labeled .sup.35 S-RXR protein, the labeled RXR could be coprecipitated in the presence of anti-Flag antibody but not in the presence of nonspecific serum (FIG. 5). Coprecipitation efficiency was slightly increased in the presence of the ApoAI-RARE but not in the presence of the MHC-TRE. In addition, incubation with a crosslinker (DSP) further enhanced coprecipitation of the labeled RXR. In all cases, specific coprecipitation was only observed in the presence of 9-cis-RA. These data, therefore, give strong support to the assumption that 9-cis-RA induced RXR homodimer formation occurs in solution and does not require RXR-DNA interaction.
Response element specific transcriptional activation by 9-cis-RA and RXR.alpha.
To investigate whether 9-cis-RA/RXR.alpha. homodimer response element interaction can be correlated with transcriptional activation of such response elements by the 9-cis-RA/RXR complex, we carried out a series of transient transfection assays in CV-1 cells, where we cotransfected receptor expression vectors with CAT reporter constructs that carried various response elements upstream of the tk promoter. CV-1 cells were transiently transfected using a modified calcium phosphate precipitation procedure as described previously.sup.42. CAT activity was normalized for transfection efficiency by measuring the enzymatic activity derived from the cotransfected .beta.-galactosidase expression plasmid (pCH110, Pharmacia). The transfected cells were grown in the absence or presence of 10.sup.-7 M 9-cis-RA or all-trans-RA.
With the TREpal containing reporter, we observed strong activation by RXR.alpha. in the presence of 9-cis-RA and little activation when RA was added. Activation could be further enhanced by cotransfection of RAR.alpha.. In this case, however, RA also functioned as an effective activator although not as efficiently as 9-cis-RA. Overall, activation by 9-cis-RA in the presence of RAR.alpha. and RXR.alpha. was approximately twice as strong as seen with RXR.alpha. alone, consistent with the DNA binding data where binding was observed by both the heterodimer and the homodimer in the presence of 9-cis-RA when both receptors were present (FIG. 6a). When we examined the .beta.RARE (FIG. 6b), we observed that this response element was highly activated by endogenous CV-1 cell receptors consistent with previous observations.sup.36,41, such that further activation by low concentrations of cotransfected receptors could not be observed. Interestingly, however, 9-cis-RA was a more potent activator at 10.sup.-7 M than RA. These data thus indicate that CV-1 cells contain endogenous retinoid receptor activity that is particularly active on the .beta.RARE and is responsive to 9-cis-RA.
The ApoAI element containing reporter was also very effectively activated by RXR.alpha. in the presence of 9-cis-RA (FIG. 6c) while RA did not induce above the level obtained in the absence of RXR.alpha.. Similar to the TREpal, maximal activation was seen when both receptors RXR.alpha. and RAR.alpha. were cotransfected. Under these conditions RA also led to a strong activation. In contrast, the CRBPI element, where we did not observe DNA binding by RXR in the presence of 9-cis-RA, also was not activated by RXR and 9-cis-RA in the transient transfection studies (FIG. 6d) while RAR.alpha. alone led to significant activation that was mostly 9-cis-RA dependent. The heterodimer RAR.alpha.RXR.alpha. allowed maximal activation in the presence of 9-cis-RA. Not unexpectedly, no induction by RXR.alpha. and 9-cis-RA was observed on the MHC-TRE, the ME-TRE or the ERE. These in vivo analyses showed a very significant correlation to the results obtained with the in vitro DNA binding studies, in that strong activation by RXR.alpha. in the presence of 9-cis-RA is only observed on the response elements that strongly interact with the 9-cis-RA induced RXR.alpha. homodimer.
9-cis Retinoic acid inhibits activation by TR/RXR heterodimer
We have observed that a CAT reported gene that is activated by a thyroid hormone receptor/RXR heterodimer in the presence of thyroid hormone (T.sub.3) can be inhibited by adding 9-cis-RA. This type of inhibition is most easily measured by using a transfection assay.
EXAMPLE II
Identification and selection of compounds which induce RXR activity We used the TREpal-tk-reporter gene in a transient transfection assay essentially as described.sup.50 to evaluate compounds for induction of RXR activity. Briefly, CV-1 cells or Hep G2 cells were grown in DME medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Cells were plated at 1.0.times.10.sup.5 per well in a 24-well plate 16-24 h before transfection. In general, 100 ng of reporter plasmid, 150 ng of .beta.-galactosidase expression vector (pCH110, Pharmacia), and variable amounts of receptor expression vector were mixed with carrier DNA (pBluescript) to 1,000 ng of total DNA per well. Chloramphenicol actyl transferase (CAT) activity was normalized for transfection efficiency by the corresponding .beta.-galactosidase activity as previously described.sup.51. As shown in Example I, the TREpal represents a response element that is activated by both RAR/RXR heterodimers and RXR homodimers. When the RXR expression vector is cotransfected with the TREpal-tk-reporter gene into CV-1 cells, all-trans-RA does not efficiently activate the reporter, whereas 9-cis-RA does. Evaluation of a series of retinoids indicated that several showed activity with RXR. The pharmacophoric elements of these structures were then combined and further modified to produce a subset of retinoids whose activation profiles for RXR were similar to that of 9-cis-RA. Induction curves for several retinoids active with RXR are shown in FIG. 7a. Interestingly, while none of the active compounds revealed activity at 10.sup.-8 M, all showed activities similar to 9-cis-RA at 10.sup.-7 M. We next used a reporter gene carrying the RARE.sup.30 of the cytoplasmic retinol binding protein II (CRBPII), a response element that is only activated by RXR homodimers, but not by RAR/RXR heterodimers. The induction profiles obtained with this response element were similar to the TREpal responses (FIG. 7b). Thus, the synthetic retinoids SR11203, SR11217, SR11234, SR11235, SR11236, and SR11237 appeared to be effective activators of RXR.alpha.. The structures of the compounds are as follows: ##STR1##
The activity rankings for this series of retinoids were the same for both the TREpal and CRBPII reporter genes. The ketal SR11237 was the most active, followed by the isopropylidenyl retinoid SR11217, the hemithioketal SR11235 and the thioketal SR11234. The dithiane SR11203 and dioxane SR11236 had the lowest activity. Conformational analysis indicated that these retinoids had spatial orientations of the lipophilic head and carboxyl terminus that were similar to those of 9-cis-RA and that activity could be related to the length and volume of the substituent group (CRR') linking the tetrahydronaphthalene and phenyl ring systems.
Given the showing in Example I that 9-cis-RA specifically activates RXR.alpha. by inducing RXR.alpha. homodimer formation, we investigated the retinoid-induced RXR homodimer binding to the TREpal using a gel retardation assay. Briefly, gel retardation assays were carried out essentially as described previously.sup.33. In vitro translated receptor receptor protein (1 to 5 ml depending on the translation efficiency) was incubated with the .sup.32 P-labeled oligonucleotides in a 20-ml reaction mixture containing 10 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 2.5 mM MgCl, 10% glycerol, and 1 mg of poly(dI-dC) at 25.degree. C. for 20 minutes. The reaction mixture was then loaded on a 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 0.5.times.TBE (1.times.TBE=0.089M Tris-borate, 0.089M boric acid, and 0.002M EDTA).
In the absence of 9-cis-RA, RXR did not bind to this response element. Retinoids SR11217, and SR11237 induced RXR homodimer binding to the response element in a concentration-dependent manner. Retinoid 11203, which behaved as a weak activator in the transient transfection assays, also induced only weak RXR binding. SR11231 which did not activate the RXR homodimer was also not able to induce RXR homodimer binding. Similar results were obtained with the CRBPII-RARE and the ApoAI-RARE. We have thus defined here a class of synthetic retinoids that activate RXR.alpha. by inducing homodimer formation and binding to DNA.
An important question was whether these RXR-active compounds, like 9-cis-RA, would also activate RAR/RXR heterodimers or whether they would be truly RXR selective. To analyze this, we used four different reporter constructs carrying either the i) rat cytoplasmic retinol binding protein I (CRBPI) gene RARE.sup.38 that is only bound and activated by RAR/RXR heterodimers; ii) the RAR.beta.2 gene promoter RARE.sup.35,36, which is most effectively bound by heterodimers but also activated to some degree by RXR homodimers; iii) the CRBPII-RARE, which is activated only by RXR homodimers, and on which RAR represses RXR activity.sup.30 ; iv) the apolipoprotein AI (apoAI) gene RARE.sup.31 that is bound and activated by RAR/RXR heterodimers as well as by RXR homodimers. The four different reporter constructs were cotransfected with RAR.alpha., RAR.beta., RXR.alpha., or with RXR.alpha. and RAR.alpha. together.sup.50. The retinoids were analyzed at a concentration of 5.times.10.sup.-7 M (a dose shown to yield almost full induction (FIG. 7).
CV-1 cells were cotransfected with 100 ng reporter plasmid a) CRBPI-tk-CAT, b) .beta.RARE-tk-CAT, c) CRBPII-tk-CAT, and d) apoAI-tk-CAT. Retinoids were applied at 5.times.10.sup.-7 M. Results of a representative experiment are shown.
The RXR-specific retinoids behaved strikingly different from 9-cis-RA (or RA) in that they only activated RXR homodimers but not RAR/RXR heterodimers. As with 9-cis-RA, both SR11217 and SR11237 were strong activators of the CRBPII-RARE (i.e. the RARE that is significantly activated only by the RXR homodimer). However, in contrast to 9-cis-RA, they did not induce the CRBPI-RARE that is activated only by the RAR/RXR heterodimer. Thus, while SR11217 and SR11237 behaved very similarly to 9-cis-RA on the CRBPII-RARE, they showed no response on the CRBPI-RARE, where 9-cis-RA is the optimal activator. The .beta.RARE was slightly activated by SR11217 and SR11237, consistent with the relatively low affinity of RXR homodimers for this response element. The apoAI-RARE was most effectively activated by RAR/RXR heterodimers in the presence of 9-cis-RA. In addition to the activity found in CV-1 cells, a significant and RXR-specific activation by retinoids SR11217 and SR11237 was also seen in various other cell lines, including Hep G2 cells, where a particular high response was seen. RAR.alpha. and RAR.beta., when cotransfected alone, were not activated significantly by any of the synthetic retinoids on any of the response elements tested. Similar negative results were obtained for RAR.gamma.. RAR.alpha. and .beta. are assumed to form heterodimers with endogenous RXR-like proteins in CV-1 cells, thus these heterodimers are also unresponsive to the synthetic retinoids.
Our data demonstrate that we have identified a novel class of retinoids that specifically induces RXR homodimer formation and that activates RXR homodimers on specific response elements but not RAR/RXR heterodimers. These retinoids allow the specific activation of RXR-selective response pathways, while not inducing RAR-dependent response pathways. These retinoids provide a much more restricted physiological response than RA isomers or other retinoids presently used.
EXAMPLE III ##STR2##
Methyl 4-�(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)carbonyl!benzoate (3):
To a suspension of aluminum chloride (1.13 g, 8.5 mmol) in 1.5 mL of 1,2-dichloroethane at 0.degree. C. under argon was added a solution of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,1,4,4-tetramethylnaphthalene 1 (1.45 g, 7.7 mmol) (Kagechika, H., et al., J. Med. Chem. 31:2182 (1988)) and 4-carbomethoxybenzoyl chloride 2 (1.56 g, 7.9 mmol) (4-carbo-methoxybenzoyl chloride 2 was obtained from mono-methyl terephthalate, which is readily available from Aldrich, in one step (SOCl.sub.2, DMF)) in 6 mL of 1,2-dichloroethane. The resulting solution was brought to room temperature and stirred thereafter for 16 h. The reaction mixture was poured onto ice water and extracted with 40% ethyl acetate/hexane. The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO.sub.3 and brine. The solution was dried over anhydrous MgSO.sub.4, filtered and concentrated to afford an orange solid (4.5 g). Flash chromatography (50% dichloromethane/hexane) yielded the desired product 3 as a pale yellow solid (2.07 g). Recrystallization from dichloromethane/hexane afforded the desired product 3 as a white, crystalline solid (1.96 g, 50%): m.p. 146.degree.-148.degree. C.; R.sub.f 0.14 (50% CH.sub.2 Cl.sub.2 /hexane). The structure of the product was also confirmed using IR, .sup.1 NMR and mass spectroscopy.
EXAMPLE IV
(a.) �2-(5,6,7,8-Tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-2-(4-carbomethoxyphenyl)!-1,3-dioxolane (8): ##STR3##
To a solution of keto-ester 3 (80 mg, 0.228) in 1 mL of benzene was added ethylene glycol (1 mL), 1,2-bis(trimethyl-silyloxy)ethane (2 mL) and a catalytic amount of p-TsOH. The reaction mixture was heated at reflux for 4 h and then cooled to room temperature. The solution was poured into saturated aqueous NaHCO.sub.3 and extracted with 40% ethyl acetate/hexane. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO.sub.4, filtered, and concentrated to afford a solid. Flash chromatography.(50% CH.sub.2 Cl.sub.2 /hexane) yielded the desired ketal 8 as a white solid (0.082 g, 91%): m.p. 14520 -147.degree. C.; R.sub.f 0.16 (50% CH.sub.2 Cl.sub.2 /hexane). The structure of the product was also confirmed using IR, .sup.1 H NMR and mass spectroscopy.
(b.) �2-(5,6,7,8-Tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naph-thalenyl)-2-(4-carboxyphenyl)!-1,3-dioxolane (9):
To a suspension of the ester 8 (50 mg, 0.127 mmol) in 75% aqueous methanol (2 mL) was added one pellet of potassium hydroxide (0.1 g), and the reaction mixture was stirred at 70.degree. C. for 1 h during which time the material dissolved. The solution was cooled to room temperature, acidified with 1N aqueous hydrochloric acid, and then extracted with 80% ethyl acetate/hexane. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO.sub.4, filtered, and concentrated to afford a white solid 9. The structure of the product was also confirmed using IR, .sup.1 H NMR and mass spectroscopy.
EXAMPLE V ##STR4##
(a.) Methyl 4-�1-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-2-methyl-1-propenyl!benzoate (19):
To a suspension of isopropyltriphenylphosphonium iodide (0.35 g, 0.807 mmol) in 3 mL of benzene under argon at room temperature was added a 0.5M solution of potassium hexamethyl-disilazide in toluene (1.8 mL, 0.89 mmol), and the red solution was stirred for 5 min. A solution of keto-ester 3 (0.169 g, 0.481 mmol) in 3 mL of benzene was added, and the red solution was heated to 110.degree. C., while approximately 4 mL of benzene was distilled out. After 1 h, the reaction mixture was diluted with 40% ethyl acetate/hexane and washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO.sub.3 and brine. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO.sub.4, filtered through a plug of silica gel, and concentrated to afford a solid. Flash chromatography (40% dichloro-methane/hexane) yielded the desired product 19 as a white powder (0.128 g, 71%): R.sub.f 0.44 (50% CH.sub.2 Cl.sub.2 /hexane). The structure of the product was also confirmed using IR, .sup.1 H NMR and mass spectroscopy.
(b.) 4-�1-(5,6,7,8-Tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-2-methyl-l-propenyl!benzoic acid (20):
To a suspension of the ester 19 (0.115 g, 0.304 mmol) in 75% aqueous methanol (3 mL) was added one pellet of potassium hydroxide (0.12 g), The mixture was stirred at 75.degree. C. for 1 h during which time the material dissolved. The solution was cooled to room temperature, acidified with 1N aqueous hydrochloric acid, and then extracted with 80% ethyl acetate/hexane. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO.sub.4, filtered, and concentrated to afford the desired acid 20 as a white powder (0.11 g, 99%): m.p. 204.degree.-206.degree. C. The structure of the product was also confirmed using IR, .sup.1 H NMR and mass spectroscopy.
The preceding examples are intended to illustrate but not limit the invention. While they are typical of those that might be used, other procedures known to those skilled in the art may be alternatively employed.
Throughout this application various publications are referenced by numbers. Following is a complete citation to the publications. The disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains.
REFERENCES
1. Lotan, R. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 605, 33-91 (1981).
2. Roberts, A. B., & Sporn, M. B. In: The Retinoids (M. B. Sporn, A. B. Roberts, D. S. Goodman, eds). Academic Press, Florida pp. 209-286 (1984).
3. Knudson, D. D. J. Invest. Dermatol. 62,288 (1974).
4. Weiss, J. S., Ellis, C. N., Headington, J. T., Tincoff, T., Hamilton, T. A., & Voorhees, J. J. JAMA 259, 527-532 (1988).
5. Hong, W. K., Lippman, S. M., Itri, L. M., Karp, D. D., Lee, J. S., Byers, R. M., Schantz, S. P., Kramer, A. M., Lotan, R., Peters, L. J., Dimery, I. W., Brown, B. W., & Goepfert, H. N. Engl. J. Med. 323, 795-804 (1990).
6. Huang, M. E., Ye, Y. C., Chen, S., Chai, J. R., Lu, J. X., Lu, L., Zhoa, L., Gu, L. J., & Wang, Z. Y. Blood 72, 567 (1988).
7. Petkovich, M., Brand, N. J., Krust, A., & Chambon, P. Nature 330, 444-450 (1987).
8. Giguere, V., Ong, E. S., Seigi, P., & Evans, R. M. Nature 330, 624-629 (1987).
9. Benbrook, D., Lernhardt, E., & Pfahl, M. Nature 333, 669-672 (1988).
10. Brand, N., Petkovich, M., Krust, A., de The, H., Marchio, A., Tiollais, P., & Dejean, A. Nature 332, 850-853 (1988).
11. Krust, A., Kastner, P. H., Petkovich, M., Zelent, A., & Chambon, P. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, U.S.A. 86, 5310-5314 (1989).
12. Giguere, V., M. Shago, R. Zirngibl, P., Tate, Rossant, J., & Varmuza, S. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 2335-2340 (1990).
13. Hamada, K., Gleason, S. L., Levi, B-Z., Hirschfeld, S., Appella, E., & Ozato, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 86, 8289-8293 (1989).
14. Mangelsdorf, D. J., Ong, E. S., Dyck, J. A., & Evans, R. M. Nature 345, 224-229 (1990).
15. Yu, V. C., Delsert, C., Andersen, B., Holloway, J. M., Devary, O. V., Naar, A. M., Kim, S. Y., Boutin, J-M., Glass, C. K., & Rosenfeld, M. G. Cell 67, 1251-1266 (1991).
16. Leid, M., Kastner, P., Lyons, R., Nakshatri, H., Saunders, M., Zacharewski, T., Chen, J-Y., Staub, A., Garnier, J-M., Mader, S., & Chambon, P. Cell 68, 377-395 (1992).
17. Mangelsdorf, D. J., Borgmeyer, U., Heyman, R. A., Zhou, J. Y., Ong, E. S., Oro, A. E., Kakizuka, A., & Evans, R. M. Genes & Dev. 6, 329-344 (1992).
18. Evans, R. M. Science 240, 889-895 (1988).
19. Green, S., & Chambon, P. Trends Genet. 4, 309-314 (1988).
20. Lehmann, J. M., Hoffman, B., & Pfahl, M. Nucl. Acids Res. 19, 573-578(1991).
21. Leroy, P., Krust, A., Zelent, A., Mendelsohn, C., Garnier, J-M., Kastner, P., Dierich, A., & Chambon, P. EMBO J. 10, 59-69 (1991).
22. Zelent, A., Mendelsohn, C., Kastner, P., Krust, A., Garnier, J-M,. Ruffenach, F., Leroy, P., & Chambon, P. EMBO J. 10, 71-81 (1991).
23. Oro, A. E., McKeown, M., & Evans, R. M. Nature 347, 298-301 (1990).
24. Heyman, R., Mangelsdorf, D. J., Dyck, J. A., Stein, R. B., Eichele, G., Evans, R. M., & Thaller, C. Cell 68, 397-406 (1992).
25. Levin, A. A., Sturzenbecker, L. J., Kazmer, S., Bosakowski, T., Huselton, C., Allenby, G., Speck, J., Kratzeisen, C., Rosenberger, M., Lovey, A., & Grippo, J. F. Nature 355, 359-361 (1992).
26. Zhang, X-k., Hoffmann, B., Tran, P., Graupner, G., & Pfahl, M. Nature 355, 441-446 (1992).
27. Kliewer, S. A., Umesono, K., Mangelsdorf, D. J., & Evans, R. M. Nature 355, 446-449 (1992).
28. Marks, M. S., Hallenbeck, P. L., Nagata, T., Segars, J. H., Apella, E., Nikodem, V. M., & Ozato, K. EMBO J. 11, 1419-1435 (1992).
29. Bugge, T. H., Pohl, J., Lonnoy, O., & Stunnenberg, H. G. EMBO J. 11, 1409-1418 (1992).
30. Mangelsdorf, D. J., Umesono, K., Kliewer, S. A., Borgmeyer, U., Ong, E. S., & Evans, R. M. Cell 66, 555-561 (1991).
31. Rottman, J. N., Widom, R. L., Nadal-Ginard, B., Mahdavi, V., & Karathanasis, S. K. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 3814-3820 (1991).
32. Hermann, T., Hoffmann, B., Zhang, X-k., Tran, P. & Pfahl, M. Mol. Endrinol. (accepted for publication).
33. Zhang, X-k., Tran, P., & Pfahl, M. Mol. Endocrinol. 5, 1909-1920 (1991b).
34. Glass, C. K., Holloway, J. M., Devary, O. V., & Rosenfeld, M. G. Cell 54, 313-323 (1988).
35. de The, H., Vivanco-Ruiz, M. M., Tiollais, P., Stunnenberg, H., & Dejean, A. Nature 343, 177-180 (1990).
36. Hoffmann, B., Lehmann, J. M., Zhang, X-k., Hermann, T., Graupner, G., & Pfahl, M. Mol. Endocrinol. 4, 1734-1743 (1990).
37. Husmann, M. B., Hoffmann, B., Stump, D. G., Chytil, F., & Pfahl, M. BBRC, in press (1992).
38. Umesono, K., Murakami, K. K., Thompson, C. C., & Evans, R. M. Cell 65, 1255-1266 (1991).
39. Flink, I. L., & Morkin, E. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11233-11237 (1990).
40. Desvergne, B., Petty, K. J., & Nikodem, V. M. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1098-1013 (1991).
41. Klein-Hitpass, L., Schorpp, M., Wagner, U., & Ryffel, G. U. Cell 46, 1053-1061 (1986).
42. Husmann, M., Lehmann, J., Hoffmann, B., Hermann, T., Tzukerman, M., & Pfahl, M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 4097-4103 (1991).
43. Tora, L., White, J., Brou, C., Tasset, D., Webster, N., Scheer, E., & Chambon, P. Cell 59, 477-487 (1989).
44. Tzukerman, M., Zhang, X-k., Wills, K. N., Graupner, G., Hermann, T., & Pfahl, M. New Biol. 2, 613-620 (1990).
45. Zhang, X-k., Wills, K. N., Graupner, G., Tzukerman, M., Hermann, T., & Pfahl, M. New Biol 3, 1-14 (1991a).
46. Yen, P. M., Darling, D. S., Carter, R. L., Forgione, M., Umeda, P. K., & Chin, W. W. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 3565-3568 (1992).
47. Forman, B. M., & Samuels, H. H. Mol. Endocrinol. 4, 1293-1301 (1990).
48. Zenke, M., Munoz, A., Sap, J., Vennstrom, B., & Beug, H. Cell 61, 1035-1049 (1990).
49. Yang-Yen, H-F., Zhang, X-k., Graupner, G., Tzukerman, M., Sakamoto, B., Karin, M., & Pfahl, M. New Biol. 3, 1206-1219 (1991).
50. X-k., Zhang, B. Hoffmann, P. Tran, G. Graupner, M. Pfahl, Nature 355, 441 (1992).
51. Pfahl et al., Methods Enzymol. 153, 256 (1990).
__________________________________________________________________________SEQUENCE LISTING(1) GENERAL INFORMATION:(iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 11(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:1:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 8 amino acids(B) TYPE: amino acid(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:1:ArgTyrLysAspAspAspAspLys15(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 31 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2:GATCAGGGCAGGGGTCAAGGGTTCAGTGATC31(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 37 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3:GATCCAGGTCACAGGTCACAGGTCACAGTTCAAGATC37(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 34 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:4:GATCTGTAGGGTTCACCGAAAGTTCACTCAGATC34(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5:GATCCAGGTCAAAAAGTCAGGATC24(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:6:GATCCTGGAGGTGACAGGAGGACAGCGATC30(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 38 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7:GATCCAGGACGTTGGGGTTAGGGGAGGACAGTGGGATC38(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:8:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 27 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:8:GATCTCAGGTCATCCTCAGGTCAGATC27(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:9:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 27 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:9:GATCTCAGGTCATCCTCAGGTCAGATC27(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:10:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 27 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:10:GATCTCAGGTCACTGTGACCTGAGATC27(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:11:(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:(A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs(B) TYPE: nucleic acid(C) STRANDEDNESS: single(D) TOPOLOGY: linear(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic)(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:11:GATCTCAGGTCATGACCTGAGATC24__________________________________________________________________________

RXR homodimer formation

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

Government Interests

Foreign Referenced Citations (1)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)

Divisions (1)

Continuation in Parts (1)