The present invention relates to semiconductor memory technology. More specifically, the invention relates to a semiconductor device utilizing an electrically floating body transistor and its usage within a memory compiler.
Semiconductor memory devices are used extensively to store data. Memory devices can be characterized according to two general types: volatile and non-volatile. Volatile memory devices such as static random access memory (SRAM) and dynamic random access memory (DRAM) lose data that is stored therein when power is not continuously supplied thereto.
A DRAM cell without a capacitor has been investigated previously. Such memory eliminates the capacitor used in the conventional 1T/1C memory cell, and thus is easier to scale to smaller feature size. In addition, such memory allows for a smaller cell size compared to the conventional 1T/1C memory cell. Chatterjee et al. have proposed a Taper Isolated DRAM cell concept in “Taper Isolated Dynamic Gain RAM Cell”, P. K. Chatterjee et al., pp. 698-699, International Electron Devices Meeting, 1978 (“Chatterjee-1”), “Circuit Optimization of the Taper Isolated Dynamic Gain RAM Cell for VLSI Memories”, P. K. Chatterjee et al., pp. 22-23, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, February 1979 (“Chatterjee-2”), and “dRAM Design Using the Taper-Isolated Dynamic RAM Cell”, J. E. Leiss et al., pp. 337-344, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-17, no. 2, April 1982 (“Leiss”), each of which are hereby incorporated herein, in their entireties, by reference thereto. The holes are stored in a local potential minimum, which looks like a bowling alley, where a potential barrier for stored holes is provided. The channel region of the Taper Isolated DRAM cell contains a deep n-type implant and a shallow p-type implant. As shown in “A Survey of High-Density Dynamic RAM Cell Concepts”, P. K. Chatterjee et al., pp. 827-839, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-26, no. 6, June 1979 (“Chatterjee-3”), which is hereby incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference thereto, the deep n-type implant isolates the shallow p-type implant and connects the n-type source and drain regions.
Terada et al. have proposed a Capacitance Coupling (CC) cell in “A New VLSI Memory Cell Using Capacitance Coupling (CC) Cell”, K. Terada et al., pp. 1319-1324, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-31, no. 9, September 1984 (“Terada”), while Erb has proposed Stratified Charge Memory in “Stratified Charge Memory”, D. M. Erb, pp. 24-25, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, February 1978 (“Erb”), both of which are hereby incorporated herein, in their entireties, by reference thereto.
DRAM based on the electrically floating body effect has been proposed both in silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate (see for example “The Multistable Charge-Controlled Memory Effect in SOI Transistors at Low Temperatures”, Tack et al., pp. 1373-1382, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 37, May 1990 (“Tack”), “A Capacitor-less 1T-DRAM Cell”, S. Okhonin et al., pp. 85-87, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, no. 2, February 2002 and “Memory Design Using One-Transistor Gain Cell on SOI”, T. Ohsawa et al., pp. 152-153, Tech. Digest, 2002 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, February 2002, all of which are hereby incorporated herein, in their entireties, by reference thereto) and in bulk silicon (see for example “A one transistor cell on bulk substrate (1T-Bulk) for low-cost and high density eDRAM”, R. Ranica et al., pp. 128-129, Digest of Technical Papers, 2004 Symposium on VLSI Technology, June 2004 (“Ranica-1”), “Scaled 1T-Bulk Devices Built with CMOS 90 nm Technology for Low-Cost eDRAM Applications”, R. Ranica et al., 2005 Symposium on VLSI Technology, Digest of Technical Papers (“Ranica-2”), “Further Insight Into the Physics and Modeling of Floating-Body Capacitorless DRAMs”, A. Villaret et al, pp. 2447-2454, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 52, no. 11, November 2005 (“Villaret”), “Simulation of intrinsic bipolar transistor mechanisms for future capacitor-less eDRAM on bulk substrate”, R. Pulicani et al., pp. 966-969, 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS) (“Pulicani”), all of which are hereby incorporated herein, in their entireties, by reference thereto).
Widjaja and Or-Bach describes a bi-stable SRAM cell incorporating a floating body transistor, where more than one stable state exists for each memory cell (for example as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/00246284 to Widjaja et al., titled “Semiconductor Memory Having Floating Body Transistor and Method of Operating” (“Widjaja-1”) and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0034041, “Method of Operating Semiconductor Memory Device with Floating Body Transistor Using Silicon Controlled Rectifier Principle” (“Widjaja-2”), which are both hereby incorporated herein, in their entireties, by reference thereto). This is bi-stability is achieved due to the applied back bias which causes impact ionization and generates holes to compensate for the charge leakage current and recombination.
For memory cells to be used in a compiler, the memory cell itself must be a repeatable and robust design which can be made modular and easily scalable to allow the compiler the flexibility to freely adjust the memory array size without complicated scenarios appearing which require complicated solutions to implement.
In one aspect of the present invention, a floating body SRAM cell that is readily scalable for selection by a memory compiler for making memory arrays is provided, the cell comprising: a floating body memory cell comprising: a floating body region configured to be charged to a level indicative of a state of the memory cell, said floating body region having a first conductivity type selected from p-type and n-type conductivity types; a first region in electrical contact with the floating body region; the first region having a second conductivity type selected from the p-type and n-type conductivity types, the second conductivity type being different from the first conductivity type; a second region in electrical contact with the floating body region and spaced apart from the first region, the second region having the first conductivity type; a second transistor connected to the second region of the floating body memory cell; and a third transistor connected to the second transistor.
In at least one embodiment, the floating body memory cell further includes a third region in electrical contact with the floating body region and spaced apart from the first and second regions, the third region having the first conductivity type.
In at least one embodiment, the second region has multiple contacts electrically connected thereto.
In at least one embodiment, the floating body memory cell further includes a gate positioned between the first and second regions.
In at least one embodiment, the floating body SRAM cell further includes a first gate positioned between the first and second regions and a second gate positioned between the first and third regions.
In at least one embodiment, the second transistor functions as a pull down device and the second transistor is gated by the third transistor.
In at least one embodiment, the floating body memory cell further includes: a third region in electrical contact with the floating body region and spaced apart from the first and second regions, the third region having the first conductivity type; and a fourth transistor electrically connected to the third region.
In at least one embodiment, the floating body SRAM cell further includes a fourth transistor electrically connected to the third region.
In at least one embodiment, the second transistor functions as a pull down device and the second transistor is gated by the third transistor; and a write access transistor is connected to the third region.
In at least one embodiment, the first region is grounded.
In at least one embodiment, the cell is used as a dual port cell.
In another aspect of the present invention, a floating body SRAM cell that is readily scalable for selection by a memory compiler for making memory arrays is provided, the cell including: a floating body memory cell comprising: a floating body region configured to be charged to a level indicative of a state of the memory cell, the floating body region having a first conductivity type selected from p-type and n-type conductivity types; a first region in electrical contact with the floating body region; the first region having a second conductivity type selected from the p-type and n-type conductivity types, the second conductivity type being different from the first conductivity type; and a second region in electrical contact with the floating body region and spaced apart from the first region, the second region having the first conductivity type; a pull down device having a gate electrically connected to the second region; and a select device electrically connected to the pull down device, the select device being configured to be connected to a read bit line.
In at least one embodiment, the select device is connected to the read bit line and the read bit line is pre-charged such that a state of the floating body region can be read according to whether the read bit line is pulled down when the select device is enabled; wherein if the state of the floating body region is “1”, the pull down device is turned on and when the select device is enabled, the read bit line is pulled down.
In at least one embodiment, the first region is electrically connected to a write bit line, and the floating body memory cell includes a gate positioned between the first and second regions; wherein a write operation to the floating body region is performable through the write bit line in conjunction with a predetermined bias on the gate.
In at least one embodiment, the read bit line has an output of either zero volts or a pre-charged voltage level, depending upon whether the floating body region is in state “1” or state “0”.
In at least one embodiment, the first region is grounded and the SRAM cell further includes a write device connecting a write word line to the second region, wherein pure logic levels are used to read from and write to the floating body region, and enablement of the write device overpowers the floating body region to write to the floating body region.
In at least one embodiment, the floating body SRAM cell further includes: a write bit line electrically connected to the write device; the write bit line being separate and independently operable of the read bit line to allow for dual port functionality.
In at least one embodiment, the floating body SRAM cell further includes a write access transistor connected between a write bit line and the first region.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method of selecting a floating body SRAM cell by a memory compiler for use in array design is provided, the method including: a user inputting preferred design criteria to at least one processor of the memory compiler; the memory compiler evaluating the preferred design criteria by executing at least one algorithm configured to select a preferred floating body SRAM cell based on the design criteria inputs received; determining whether a preferred floating body SRAM cell can be identified based upon the preferred design criteria inputted and the at least one algorithm executed; and selecting the preferred floating body SRAM cell when identifiable, providing the user with an array design requested by the user, wherein the array design employs the preferred floating body SRAM cells; and when a preferred floating body SRAM cell cannot be clearly identified, proving the user with a report identifying floating body SRAM cell types that were eliminated base on the preferred design criteria, proving remaining SRAM cell type choices that were not eliminated and indicating which are preferable for selection; and requesting the user to adjust the preferred design criteria or provide an override so as to manually select a preferred floating body SRAM cell type.
In at least one embodiment, the floating body SRAM cell types from which the preferred floating body SRAM cell type is selected include: one-transistor floating body SRAM cell, two-transistor floating body SRAM cell, three-transistor floating body SRAM cell, four-transistor floating body SRAM cell, dual-port floating body SRAM cell and pseudo dual port floating body SRAM cell.
According to an aspect of the present invention a floating body memory cell designed for use in conjunction with a memory compiler is described. Also described are methods, criteria and algorithms to utilize floating body memory cells within a memory compiler.
These and other features of the invention will become apparent to those persons skilled in the art upon reading the details of the memory cells, arrays, methods and compilers as more fully described below.
Before the present memory cells, arrays, compiler and methods are described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular embodiments described, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.
Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limits of that range is also specifically disclosed. Each smaller range between any stated value or intervening value in a stated range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the invention. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included or excluded in the range, and each range where either, neither or both limits are included in the smaller ranges is also encompassed within the invention, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the invention.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are now described. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited.
It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a cell” includes a plurality of such cells and reference to “the array” includes reference to one or more arrays and/or sub-arrays and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.
The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication, as the dates of publication provided may be different from the actual publication dates which may need to be independently confirmed.
Definitions
The term “threshold voltage” or “Vt”, as used herein, refers to the minimum voltage level required to be applied to the gate of a floating body memory cell in order to turn on the floating body memory cell to allow conduction between the source and drain of the floating body memory cell.
The term “compiler” “memory compiler”, as used herein, refers to a program (and/or computer that executes the program) that takes a source code or set of constraints and creates a memory array design and physical layout comprising a plurality of memory cells based on the source code or constraints. These generated memory arrays can then be used in various application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC) designs and/or full custom designs as seen fit by the user. Memory compilers can be written to utilize a variety of memory technologies such as metal programmable read-only memory (ROM), anti-fuse ROM, static random-access memory (SRAM), erasable, programmable read-only memory (EPROM), Flash memory, etc. Some memory compilers have the ability to freely switch between multiple memory technologies based on the criteria provided.
“Pure logic levels” are voltage levels which are consistent with the supply voltages used within the logic gates and circuits throughout the rest of the device or macro. Typical examples of these voltages would be supplies like Vdd and Gnd. These voltages may be supplied by the end user or generated by some other circuit like a voltage regulator.
Detailed Description
A memory compiler receives criteria or source code inputted to it and executes one or more algorithms to generate a variety of outputs such as, but not limited to, memory array circuit design, memory array layout, memory array timing model, memory array functional model, timing specifications, and memory array symbol.
The array outputs generated by memory compilers are typically customizable to an extent. The memory array sizes, including page/word size, are usually available as customizable criteria. Timing/performance is also usually a customizable parameter/criterion, which will directly affect layout size depending on the required performance Tradeoffs between array periphery size and performance are made based on the criteria provided from the user.
For memory cells to be used in a memory compiler, the memory cell itself must be a repeatable and robust design which can be made modular and easily scalable to allow the memory compiler the flexibility to freely adjust the memory array size without complicated scenarios appearing which require complicated solutions to implement.
The present invention provides scalable memory cells based on the use of floating body mechanics. The scalable floating body memories behave similarly to SRAM and are statically stable with two stable states (state 0 and state 1). Also provided are criteria which a compiler can utilize to optimize and select a preferred or ideal floating body technology to be used in a memory design.
A buried layer 22 of the second conductivity type is also provided in the substrate 12, buried in the substrate 12, as shown. Buried layer 22 may also be formed by an ion implantation process on the material of substrate 12. Alternatively, buried layer 22 can be grown epitaxially. A floating body region 24 of the substrate 12 having a first conductivity type, such as a p-type conductivity type, is bounded by surface, first and second regions 16, 18, insulating layers 26 and buried layer 22. Insulating layers 26 (e.g., shallow trench isolation (STI)), may be made of silicon oxide, for example. Insulating layers 26 insulate cell 101 from neighboring cells 101 when multiple cells 101 are joined in an array. A gate 60 is positioned in between the regions 16 and 18, and above the surface 14. The gate 60 is insulated from surface 14 by an insulating layer 62. Insulating layer 62 may be made of silicon oxide and/or other dielectric materials, including high-K dielectric materials, such as, but not limited to, tantalum peroxide, titanium oxide, zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, and/or aluminum oxide. The gate 60 may be made of polysilicon material or metal gate electrode, such as tungsten, tantalum, titanium and their nitrides.
In another embodiment, the memory cell 101 may be provided with p-type conductivity type as the first conductivity type and n-type conductivity type as the second conductivity type.
Operation of floating body memory cell (FBMC) 101 of
The FBMC 101′ shown in
In
To write to the FBMC 101, 101′ the write bit line 114 and the write word line 111 are used. Multiple techniques can be utilized to implement a write 1 or write 0 operations such as Gate Induced Drain Leakage (GIDL) or Gate coupling. GIDL can be used to move the cell 101, 101′ to state 1 by driving the write bit line 114 to a positive voltage such as 1.8V, while moving the write word line 111 to a negative voltage such as −1.8V. These conditions will induce a GIDL condition between the high drain/source voltage and the negative gate voltage. Holes will then be injected into the floating body 24 causing the energy barrier between State 0 and State 1 to be overcome in the FBMC operation. Care must be taken in selecting voltages to avoid disturbing cells 101, 101′ along the write word line 111 and the write bit line 114. A write 0 can be implemented by driving write bit line 114 to a slightly negative voltage such as −0.3 V and then driving the write word line 111 to a high voltage such as 0.6V. The positive voltage on the write word line 111 will cause the floating body 24 to couple high through the gate 60 of device 101, 101′. As the voltage of the FB 24 of cell 101, 101′ goes higher, holes are then evacuated due to the forward biased PN junction.
The above method has a drawback of requiring two distinctly separate operations to implement a write 0 and a write 1 and thus require a two-step write operation. Alternatively floating body 24 coupling may be used to write both a state 1 and a state 0 which would avoid the need for a two-step write process. To implement this alternative, write word line 111 is taken from low to high (e.g., about 0V to about 1.8V) during the write operation. The write bit line 114 is used to select which state will be written to FBMC 101, 101′. Write bit line 114 is taken high to a voltage such as 1.8V in order to move the FBMC 101, 101′ to State 1. A high voltage on the write bit line 114 causes electrical isolation of the floating body 24 of FBMC 101, 101′. Thus when the write word line 111 moves from 0V to 1.8V, the floating body 24 couples up with the gate 60 causing a transition from State 0 to State 1. Alternatively to write a state 0, the write bit line 114 can be held at a slightly negative voltage such as −0.3V. When the write word line 111 transitions from 0V to 1.8V, the floating body 24 will attempt to couple with the write word line 111. However, due to the negative voltage on write bit line 114, the PN junction between the floating body 24 and the write bit line 114 will forward bias and evacuate holes from the floating body 24. In addition as the write word line 111 transitions from 0V to 1.8V, a channel will develop as the FBMC 101, 101′ turns on. Once the channel develops it will pass the bit line 114 voltage from source to drain. Since the write bit line 114 is being held at a slightly negative voltage, this acts as a shield reducing the coupling ratio between the gate 60 of cell 101, 101′ to the floating body 24 of cell 101, 101′.
Due to the completely independent nature of the read and write access, the embodiment in
Operation of the embodiment of
The write access transistor 204 is used to write to the FBMC 201, 201′. The desired state voltage is driven to the bit line 215. A low voltage such as 0V may be used to set the FBMC 201, 201′ to State 0, while a high voltage such as 1.8V may be used to set the FBMC 201, 201′ to State 1. To write to the FBMC 201, 201′, the write access transistor 204 is turned on by driving the write word line 210 from low to high. This passes the contents of the bit line 215 to the P+ terminal 18 of the FBMC 201, 201′. This has the effect of directly forcing the floating body 24 of the FBMC 201, 201′ to either a high or low state. After the FBMC 201, 201′ has been written to, the write access transistor 204 may be turned off by transitioning the write word line 210 from high to low.
The ground voltage on the source 16 of the FBMC 201, 201′ biases the FBMC 201, 201′ to ensure the bistable nature of the FBMC 201, 201′. Note that the gate 60 of the FBMC 201, 201′ is not required for the read and write operation of this memory cell 201, 201′ and can be held at a voltage such as ground via line 212. However, it is also possible to use the gate 60 of the FBMC 201, 201′ to assist with read and write operations by allowing for some additional coupling during read and write operations. During a read operation it is possible to slightly boost the floating body 24 voltage to improve the conductivity of sense device 202. During a write operation the gate 60 voltage coupling could be used to help improve the efficiency and speed of the write operation.
Alternate memory cell structures 201 and 201′ as shown respectively in
Operation of the embodiment in
The embodiments listed are not limited to a one-transistor (1T) floating body memory cell. Rather, the embodiments described above can also be used in conjunction with other floating body memory cells such as two-transistor (2T) or dual port floating body memory cells, for example, such as described by Widjaja in International Application No. PCT/US13/26466, titled “Memory Cell Comprising First and Second Transistors and Methods of Operating” and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0120752, titled “Dual-Port Semiconductor Memory and First-In First-Out (FIFO) Memory Having Electrically Floating Body Transistor”, which are both hereby incorporated herein, in their entireties, by reference thereto. Read and write access and sense devices will have to be incremented accordingly to allow for the true dual port access.
Beyond the implementation of scalable floating body memory cells to be used in compilers, specific criteria can be used to properly select the ideal floating body memory technology to be used within a memory design. Speed/performance, density, standby power, port access, memory size, reliability, byte size, page size and erase block size are all examples of criteria which can be used to select the preferred floating body memory cells to be used with a memory array design. Examples of the floating body memory cells available for selection may include, but are not limited to: 1T cell, 2T cell, 3T cell, 4T cell, dual port cell, and pseudo dual port cell (where logic circuitry can be used to separate the read and write operations and thus make a memory cell to appear as a dual port memory cell). Individual criteria alone can be used to select a preferred memory cell to be used within a memory compiler, or a combination of criteria can be used to select the preferred memory cell technology for use in making a floating body memory array. For example, in the above exemplary conditions speed/performance may be used to exclude the use of 1T cells for high speed and high performance cells, since the 1T cells require multiple pass write operations, as data must be read and the cell erased prior to writing new data to a 1T array. Further criteria can be used to further eliminate the options for a preferred floating body memory cell array design. However in the case where high density is the desired selected criteria, then the 1T cell may be immediately identified as the ideal choice.
A desired priority of parameters may also be used to select the optimal floating body memory cell for use in making an array. A ranking system can be used to prioritize the importance of the various parameters by rank. For example, the parameter that is most important for the design would have the highest rank, with the second-most important parameter being second ranked, and so forth.
Another example of a selection criterion can be standby power. Different selections of cell size and configuration may be considered based on the standby power requirements.
An example of how the previously mentioned criteria can be used to select a preferred floating body memory cell for use in an array design is provided hereafter. Speed/performance: 2T, 3T and 4T would be available options. 1T would be ruled out since it is the slowest due to the need for it to erase an entire row/page and then re-write the new data.
Density: 1T cell would be the primary option. Rankings would be based on the smaller cells having priority (e.g. 2T, then 3T, then 4T):
Standby power: 2T or 4T would be preferred since these two cells completely isolate the FBMC to avoid potential leakage paths between cells;
Port access: Options here could be single port, dual port or pseudo dual port. This criterion could actually be used as an option to add to any of the current cells as the use of the dual port FBMC may be considered for all memory cells. Pseudo dual port memory cells could be listed as an option which would prioritize the 3T and 4T cells;
Memory size: Larger arrays would probably lean toward the 1T cell for the high density advantage they provide. An argument can also be given for the 4T cell since it is so robust and can easily scale to large bit line and word line dimensions since it has the simplest reading and writing mechanics;
Reliability: 4T cell may be desirable due to the simplicity of the read and write mechanics;
Erase block size/single bit selectivity: This criterion may be used to rule out the 1T cell choice, since it requires a row/page to be erased before being written. This most likely will require a read prior to writing, then an erase, then a re-writing of data. Bit selectivity would suggest the 2T, 3T or 4T cells since all of those options are bit selectable for write operations.
An example of a memory compiler utilizing a selection process for a floating body memory cell is provided in
Referring back to event 506, if it is determined that an override option has not been submitted by the user, then the compiler evaluates the other user input at event 514 to attempt to determine the best choice of floating body memory cell to select for making the array, based upon the user's inputs. The evaluation process may include processing the input data to find a selected type of floating body memory cell by process of elimination, selecting the cell type that has the greatest number of features selecting those inputted by the user, and/or by other analysis techniques, including, but not limited to average weighting of ranked features for each cell type and then selecting the cell type with the highest weighted average.
At event 516, the compiler determines whether the evaluation process of event 514 has provided a clear solution as to which type of floating body memory cell is to be selected. If the evaluation process did provide a clear solution, then the compiler at event 518 outputs a report to the user which provides the details upon which the selected memory cell type was selected. Optionally, the process may provide the user an opportunity to review the detailed report to determine whether the cell type that has been selected is acceptable. This is indicated by optional event 520 in
If optional event 520 is carried out and the cell selection is not acceptable, the user at event 520 can then input a cell override option, and processing returns to event 506, where it is determined that there is a cell override option, and processing goes to event 508, which was described above.
Referring back to event 516, if it is determined that the evaluation process of event 516 did not provide a clear solution, for example when the provided criteria provides multiple potential solutions or possibly even no available solution, then the compiler at event 522 outputs a report to the user that explains which cell type choices were eliminated and upon which user criteria those choices were eliminated. Additionally, the report details which cell types are the best options (those which have not yet been eliminated) and shows the details of the user input that apply to each cell type remaining.
At event 524, the compiler processing prompts the user to adjust the criteria of the original user input or provide an override and rerun the processing. This returns the processing to event 502 where the user adjusts the user input to restart the process.
Thus, if the compiler, upon evaluation of criteria provided by the user, determines a clear solution as to the specific type of floating body memory cell to select for use in making an array, a report is generated explaining why the specific floating body was selected and which criteria influenced the decision.
On the other hand, if there is no clear single solution, a report can be provided to the user explaining why the compiler had trouble selecting a floating body memory cell to use. It can explain which cells were eliminated from the process and which cells were final candidates and what criteria influenced the decision. The user can then either choose to select a specific floating body memory cell to use with the compiler or again adjust the criteria to influence the decision of the generator.
CPU 702 is also coupled to an interface 710 that includes one or more input/output devices such as video monitors, track balls, mice, keyboards, microphones, touch-sensitive displays, transducer card readers, magnetic or paper tape readers, tablets, styluses, voice or handwriting recognizers, or other well-known input devices such as, of course, other computers, any of which may be provided to a user of the compiler for providing inputs and receiving outputs in the process described with regard to
The hardware elements described above may implement the instructions of multiple software modules for performing the operations of this invention. For example, instructions/algorithms for use in selecting an optimum choice of floating body memory cell for use in building a memory array may be stored on mass storage device 708 or 714 and executed on CPU 702 in conjunction with primary memory 706. Likewise, algorithms and instructions for design and building of a memory array, based upon a specific type of floating body memory cell and other user inputs may be stored on mass storage device 708 or 714 and executed on CPU 702 in conjunction with primary memory 706.
The embodiments described above use a P+ tap cell. The present invention provides floating body memory cells that are ideal for memory compiler uses in array design, as they are easily scalable and robust in nature with robust operating conditions. Alternatively, an N+ tap cell can be used for a cell having an n-type floating body region 24. In each case, the tap cell is of the same conductivity type as the floating body region, but is more heavily doped.
The embodiment of
Read bit line 115 can be pre-charged and then contents can be read depending on if read bit line 115 is pulled down once select transistor 103 is enabled. If the data stored in floating body region 24 is high (i.e., state “1”), the pull down transistor 102 will be turned on. If select gate (device 103) is enabled, bit line 115 will be pulled low.
Region 16 is connected to a write bit line 114. Write operations can be performed to floating body region 24 through the write bit line 114 in conjunction with the gate bias on gate 60. Advantageously with regard to the read path, the output of the read bit line 115 will be either pre-charged voltage or 0V, depending upon the current state of the floating body region 24. Scalability is based on performance here. For larger columns of memory cells, the memory compiler can adjust to either reduce the read speed, or adjust to use a larger cell with a stronger pull down and pass gate.
The embodiment of
The embodiment of
The embodiment of
The embodiment of
While the present invention has been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter, process, process step or steps, to the objective, spirit and scope of the present invention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims appended hereto.
This application is a division of co-pending application Ser. No. 16/676,744, filed Nov. 7, 2019, which is a division of application Ser. No. 15/820,869, filed on Nov. 22, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,504,585, which is a division of application Ser. No. 15/002,207, filed on Dec. 20, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,865,332, which is a division of application Ser. No. 14/250,370, filed on Apr. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,275,723, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/810,433 filed Apr. 10, 2013, which applications and patents are hereby incorporated herein, in their entireties, by reference thereto and to which applications we claim priority, under 35 U.S.C. Section 120 and 35 U.S.C. Section 119, respectively.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4300212 | Simko | Nov 1981 | A |
4385308 | Uchida | May 1983 | A |
4959812 | Momodoni et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5519831 | Holzhammer | May 1996 | A |
5581504 | Chang et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5748538 | Lee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5767549 | Chen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5999444 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005818 | Ferrant et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6064100 | Wen | May 2000 | A |
6141248 | Forbes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6163048 | Hirose et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166407 | Ohta | Dec 2000 | A |
6243293 | Van Houdt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6341087 | Kunikiyo et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356485 | Proebsting et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6376876 | Shin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6542411 | Tanikawa et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6614684 | Shukuri et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625057 | Iwata | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6724657 | Shukuri et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6791882 | Seki et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801452 | Miwa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6845042 | Ichige et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6870751 | van Brocklin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885581 | Nemati et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912150 | Portman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925006 | Fazan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6954377 | Choi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969662 | Fazan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7085156 | Ferrant et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118986 | Steigerwalt et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7170807 | Fazan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7209384 | Kim | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7224019 | Hieda et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7259420 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259992 | Shirota | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280399 | Fazan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285820 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7301803 | Okhonin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301838 | Waller et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7329580 | Cho et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7440333 | Hsia et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447068 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7450423 | Lai et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473611 | Cho et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7498630 | Ichige et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504302 | Matthew et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7542345 | Okhonin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7579241 | Hieda et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7609551 | Shino et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7622761 | Park et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7701763 | Roohparvar | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733693 | Ferrant et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7759715 | Bhattacharyya | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7760548 | Widjaja | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7847338 | Widjaja | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7933139 | Lung | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933140 | Wang et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8014200 | Widjaja | Sep 2011 | B2 |
3036033 | Widjaja | Oct 2011 | A1 |
8059459 | Widjaja | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8077536 | Widjaja | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8130547 | Widjaja et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8130548 | Widjaja et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8159868 | Widjaja | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8159878 | Widjaja | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8174886 | Widjaja et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8194451 | Widjaja | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208302 | Widjaja | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8243499 | Widjaja | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8264875 | Widjaja et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8294193 | Widjaja | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8391066 | Widjaja | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8472249 | Widjaja | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8514622 | Widjaja | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514623 | Widjaja et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8531881 | Widjaja | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8559257 | Widjaja | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570803 | Widjaja | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8582359 | Widjaja | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8654583 | Widjaja | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8711622 | Widjaja | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8767458 | Widjaja | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787085 | Widjaja | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8817548 | Widjaja et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8837247 | Widjaja | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8923052 | Widjaja | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8934296 | Widjaja | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8937834 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8957458 | Widjaja | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8995186 | Widjaja | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9001581 | Widjaja | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025358 | Widjaja | May 2015 | B2 |
9029922 | Han et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9030872 | Widjaja et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9087580 | Widjaja | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9153309 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9153333 | Widjaja | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9208840 | Widjaja et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9208880 | Louie et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9209188 | Widjaja | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230651 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9230965 | Widjaja | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9236382 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9257179 | Widjaja | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9275723 | Louie et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9391079 | Widjaja | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9401206 | Widjaja | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9431401 | Han et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9455262 | Widjaja | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9460790 | Widjaja | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9484082 | Widjaja | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9490012 | Widjaja | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9514803 | Widjaja | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9524970 | Widjaja | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9576962 | Widjaja et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9589963 | Widjaja | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9601493 | Widjaja | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9614080 | Widjaja | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9646693 | Widjaja | May 2017 | B2 |
9653467 | Widjaja et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9666275 | Widjaja | May 2017 | B2 |
9679648 | Widjaja | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9704870 | Widjaja | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9715932 | Widjaja | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9747983 | Widjaja | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9761311 | Widjaja | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9761589 | Widjaja | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9793277 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9812203 | Widjaja | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9812456 | Widjaja | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9831247 | Han et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9847131 | Widjaja | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9865332 | Louie et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9893067 | Widjaja et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9905564 | Widjaja et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9922711 | Widjaja | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9922981 | Widjaja | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9928910 | Widjaja | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9960166 | Widjaja | May 2018 | B2 |
9978450 | Widjaja | May 2018 | B2 |
10008266 | Widjaja | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10026479 | Louie et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10032514 | Widjaja | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10032776 | Widjaja et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10056387 | Widjaja | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10074653 | Widjaja | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10079236 | Widjaja | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10103149 | Han et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109349 | Widjaja | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10141315 | Widjaja et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10163907 | Widjaja et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10181471 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10192872 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10204684 | Widjaja | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10204908 | Widjaja | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10210934 | Widjaja | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10211209 | Widjaja | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10242739 | Widjaja | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10249368 | Widjaja | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10340006 | Widjaja | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10340276 | Widjaja et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10347636 | Widjaja | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10373685 | Louie et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10388378 | Widjaja | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10403361 | Widjaja | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10453847 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10461083 | Han et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10461084 | Widjaja | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10468102 | Widjaja | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10497443 | Widjaja | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10504585 | Louie et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10515968 | Widjaja | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10529424 | Widjaja | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10553281 | Widjaja | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10593675 | Widjaja et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10615163 | Widjaja | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10622069 | Widjaja | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10629599 | Widjaja et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10644001 | Widjaja et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10644002 | Widjaja | May 2020 | B2 |
10707209 | Widjaja | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10734076 | Widjaja | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10748904 | Widjaja et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10797055 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10804276 | Widjaja | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10818354 | Widjaja | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10825520 | Widjaja | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10839905 | Louie et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10861548 | Widjaja | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10867676 | Widjaja | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10978455 | Widjaja et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991698 | Widjaja | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11004512 | Widjaja | May 2021 | B2 |
11011232 | Widjaja | May 2021 | B2 |
11018136 | Widjaja et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11031401 | Han et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11037929 | Widjaja | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11063048 | Widjaja | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11100994 | Louie et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11133313 | Widjaja | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11183498 | Widjaja et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11211125 | Widjaja | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11217300 | Louie et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
20020018366 | von Schwerin et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020048193 | Tanikawa et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20050003612 | Hackler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024968 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032313 | Forbes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050124120 | Du et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060018164 | Wu | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060044915 | Park et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060125010 | Bhattacharyya | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060157679 | Scheuerlein | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060227601 | Bhattacharyya | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237770 | Huang et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060278915 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070004149 | Tews | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070090443 | Choi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070164352 | Padilla | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070210338 | Orlowski | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215954 | Mouli | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242513 | Chang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263466 | Morishita et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284648 | Park et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080048239 | Huo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080248 | Lue et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111154 | Voldman | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123418 | Widjaja | May 2008 | A1 |
20080224202 | Young et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080265305 | He et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080303079 | Cho et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090034320 | Ueda | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090065853 | Hanafi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081835 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085089 | Chang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108322 | Widjaja | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108351 | Yang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109750 | Widjaja | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090173985 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190402 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090251966 | Widjaja | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090316492 | Widjaja | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008139 | Bae | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034041 | Widjaja | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046287 | Widjaja | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100157664 | Chung | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100246277 | Widjaja | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246284 | Widjaja | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290271 | Lung | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110012202 | Chang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032756 | Widjaja | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110042736 | Widjaja | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044110 | Widjaja | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110145777 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170329 | Kang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110228591 | Widjaja | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228617 | Wang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110305085 | Widjaja | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120012915 | Widjaja | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014180 | Widjaja | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014188 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120069652 | Widjaja | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081976 | Widjaja et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106234 | Widjaja | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113712 | Widjaja | May 2012 | A1 |
20120217549 | Widjaja | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230123 | Widjaja et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120241708 | Widjaja | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120281475 | Oh et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130015517 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130058169 | Lee et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130094280 | Widjaja | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130229857 | Kajigaya | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250685 | Widjaja | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130264656 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140036577 | Widjaja | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140159156 | Widjaja | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140160868 | Widjaja et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140198551 | Louie et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140307501 | Louie et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140332899 | Widjaja | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340972 | Widjaja et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140355343 | Widjaja | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150023105 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150092486 | Widjaja | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150109860 | Widjaja | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150155284 | Widjaja | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170743 | Widjaja | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150187776 | Widjaja | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213892 | Widjaja | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150221650 | Widjaja et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150221653 | Han et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150310917 | Widjaja | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150371707 | Widjaja | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160005741 | Widjaja | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005750 | Widjaja | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160078921 | Widjaja et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086655 | Widjaja | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086954 | Widjaja et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160111158 | Widjaja | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160148675 | Louie et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160300613 | Widjaja | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160300841 | Widjaja | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160336326 | Han et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160365444 | Widjaja | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170025534 | Widjaja | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032842 | Widjaja | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170040326 | Widjaja | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170053919 | Widjaja et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170092359 | Louie et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092648 | Widjaja | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170125421 | Widjaja et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170133091 | Widjaja | May 2017 | A1 |
20170133382 | Widjaja | May 2017 | A1 |
20170154888 | Widjaja | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170169887 | Widjaja | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170213593 | Widjaja | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170221900 | Widjaja et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170229178 | Widjaja | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170229466 | Widjaja et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170271339 | Widjaja | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170294230 | Widjaja | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170365340 | Widjaja | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170365607 | Widjaja | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180012893 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025780 | Widjaja | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180047731 | Widjaja | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180069008 | Han et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180075907 | Widjaja | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180096721 | Louie et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180158825 | Widjaja et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180166446 | Widjaja | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180174654 | Widjaja | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182458 | Widjaja | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182460 | Widjaja | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180219013 | Widjaja | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233199 | Widjaja | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180301191 | Widjaja | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180301192 | Louie et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180308848 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180330790 | Widjaja | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331109 | Widjaja | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180358360 | Han et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180374854 | Widjaja | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190006367 | Widjaja | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190027220 | Widjaja | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190027476 | Louie et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190067289 | Widjaja et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190096889 | Widjaja et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190131305 | Widjaja et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190139962 | Widjaja | May 2019 | A1 |
20190148381 | Widjaja et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190156889 | Widjaja | May 2019 | A1 |
20190156890 | Widjaja | May 2019 | A1 |
20190164974 | Widjaja | May 2019 | A1 |
20190180820 | Widjaja | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189212 | Widjaja | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190259763 | Widjaja et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190267089 | Widjaja | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190267382 | Widjaja | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190295646 | Widjaja | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190311769 | Louie et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190355419 | Widjaja | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200013780 | Widjaja | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013781 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035682 | Han et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200051633 | Widjaja | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200075091 | Louie et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200091155 | Widjaja | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200118627 | Widjaja | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200118628 | Widjaja | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200168609 | Widjaja et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200203346 | Widjaja | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200227415 | Widjaja et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200243529 | Widjaja et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200243530 | Widjaja | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200312855 | Widjaja | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200335503 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200342939 | Widjaja | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200411521 | Widjaja et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210005608 | Widjaja | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210050059 | Widjaja | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210057027 | Louie et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210074358 | Widjaja | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210225844 | Widjaja et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210249078 | Widjaja | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210257025 | Widjaja | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210257365 | Widjaja | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210288051 | Han et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210327880 | Widjaja | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210358547 | Louie et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210398981 | Widjaja | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Pulcani et al., “Simulation of intrinsic bipolar transistor mechanisms for future capacitor-less eDRAM on bulk substrate”, Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS), 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on.., IEEE, 2010, pp. 966-969. |
Rodriguez et al., “A-RAM memory cell: concept and operation”, Electron Device Letters, IEEE, vol. 31, No. 9 (2010), pp. 972-974. |
Rodriguez et al., “A-RAM Novel capacitor-less DRAM memory”, Intl SOI Conference, 2009 IEEE International.., pp. 1-2, IEEE, 2009. |
Zhang et al., “Total ionizing Dose Effects on FinFET-Based Capacitor-less 1T-DRAMs”, Nuclear Science, IEEE Trnasactions on . . . , vol. 57, No. 6, 2010, pp. 3298-3304. |
Villaret et al., “Mechanisms of charge modulation in the floating body of triple-well nMOSFET capacitor-less DRAMs”, Microelectronic Engineering 72 (2004) 434-439. |
Almeida et al., “Comparison between low and high read bias in FB-RAM on UTBOX FDSOI devices”, IEEE, 1978-1-4673-0192-3/12, 2012, pp. 61-64. |
Andrade et al., “The impact of Back Bias on the Floating Body Effect in UTBOX SOI Devices for 1T-FBRAM Memory Applications”, 2012 8th International Caribbean Conferences on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICCDCS), IEEE, 2012,, 978-1-4577-1117-6/12/$26.00. |
Aoulaiche et al., “Hot Hole Induced Damage in 1T-FBRAM on Bulk FinFET”, 978-1-4244-911-7/11/$26.00. IEEE, 2011, pp. 2D.3.1-2D.3.6. |
Aoulaiche et al., “Junction Field Effect on the Retention Time for One-Transistor Floating-Body RAM”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 59, No. 8, Aug. 2012, pp. 2167-2172. |
Avci et al., “Floating-Body Diode—A Novel DRAM Device”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 2, Feb. 2012, pp. 161-163. |
Cao et al., “A Novel 1T-DRAM Cell for Embedded Application”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 59, No. 5, May 2012, pp. 1304-1310. |
Cho et al., “Variation-Aware Study of BJT-based Capacitorless DRAM Cell Scaling Limit”, Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (SNW), 2012 IEEE; 978-1-4673-0996-7. |
Cho et al., “Variation Study and Implications for BJT-BasedThin-Body Capacitorless DRAM”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 3, Mar. 2012, pp. 312-314. |
Chun et al., “A 667 MHz Logic-Compatible Embedded DRAM Featuring an Asymmetric 2T Gain Cell for High Speed on-Die Caches”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 2, Feb. 2012, pp. 547-559. |
Collaert et al., “Substrate bias dependency of sense margin and retention in bulk FinFET 1T-DRAM cells”, Solid-State Electronics 65-66 (2011) 205-210. |
Galeti et al., “BJT effect analysis in p- and n-SOI MuGFETs with high-k gate dielectrics and TiN metal gate electrode for a 1T-DRAM application”, 978-1-61284-760-3/11/$26.00 © 2011 IEEE. |
Gamiz et al., “3D Trigate 1T-DRAM memory cell for 2x nm nodes”, 978-1-4673-1081-9/12/$31.00 © 2012 IEEE. |
Gamiz et al., “A 20nm Low-Power Triple-Gate Multibody 1T-DRAM cell”, 978-14577-2084-0/12/$26.00 © 2012 IEEE. |
Hwang et al., “Offset Buried Metal Gate Vertical Floating Body Memory Technology with Excellent Retention Time for DRAM Application”, 2011 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 172-173. |
Kim et al., “Optical Charge-Pumping: A Universal Trap Characterization Technique for Nanoscale Floating Body Devices”, 2011 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 190-191. |
Lee et al., “A Novel Capacitorless 1T DRAM Cell for Data Retention Time Improvement”, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, vol. 10, No. 3, May 2011; pp. 462-466. |
Liu et al., “A three-dimensional DRAM using floating body cell in FDSOI devices”, 978-1-4673-1188-5/12/$31.00 © 2012 IEEE. |
Lu et al., “A Floating-Body/Gate DRAM Cell Upgraded for Long Retention Time”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 2011, pp. 731-733. |
Mahatme et al., “Total Ionizing Dose Effects on Ultra Thin Buried Oxide Floating Body Memories”, 978-1-4577-1680-5/12/$26.00 © 2012 IEEE; pp. MY.3.1-MY.3.5. |
Moon et al., “Multi-Functional Universal Device using a Band-Engineered Vertical Structure”, 978-1-4577-0505-2/11/$26.00 © 2011 IEEE, pp. 24.6.1-24.6.4. |
Nicoletti et al., “The Dependence of Retention Time on Gate Length in UTBOX FBRAM With Different Source/Drain Junction Engineering”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 7, Jul. 2012, pp. 940-942. |
Rodriguez et al., “Novel Capacitorless 1T-DRAM Cell for22-nm Node Compatible With Bulk and SOI Substrates”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 58, No. 8, Aug. 2011, pp. 2371-2377. |
Romanjek et al., “Compact (Wg/Lg)=80/85 nm FDSOI 1T-DRAM programmed by Meta Stable Dip”, 978-1-4673-0192-3/12/$31.00 © 2012 IEEE, pp. 199-202. |
Rothemund et al., “The importance of being modular”, 584 | NATURE | vol. 485 | May 31, 2012, pp. 584-585. |
Shim et al., “A BJT-Based Heterostructure 1T-DRAM for Low-Voltage Operation”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 14-16. |
Shin et al., “A Novel Double HBT-Based Capacitorless 1T Dram Cell With Si/SiGe Heterojunctions”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 32, No. 7, Jul. 2011, pp. 850-852. |
Shin et al., “Vertical-Gate Si/SiGe Double-HBT-Based Capacitorless 1T DRAM Cell for Extended Retention Time at Low Latch Voltage”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 2, Feb. 2012, pp. 134-136. |
Ventrice et al., “Analytical model of deeply-scaled thyristors for memory applications”, Microelectronics and Electron Devices (WMED), 2012 IEEE Workshop on, 978-1-4577-1735-2, pp. 1-4. |
Wu et al., “Experimental Demonstration of the High-Performance Floating-Body/Gate DRAM Cell for Embedded Mlemories”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 6, Jun. 2012, pp. 743-745. |
Pelizzer et al., “A 90nm Phase Change Memory Technology for Stand-Alone Non-Volatile Memory Applications”, 2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 1-4244-0005-8/06/$20.00 (c) 2006 IEEE. |
Chatterjee, et al. “Taper isolated dynamic gain RAM cell.” Electron Devices Meeting, 1978 International. vol. 24. IEEE, 1978, pp. 698-699. |
Chatterjee, et al. Circuit Optimization of the Paper Isolated Dynamic Gain RAM Cell for VLSI Memories, pp. 22-23, 1979. |
Chatterjee, et al. “a survey of high-density dynamic RAM cell concepts.” Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on 26.6 (1979): 827-839. |
Erb, D. “Stratified charge memory.” Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers. 1978 IEEE International. vol. 21. IEEE, 1978, pp. 24-25. |
Lanyon et al., “Bandgap Narrowing in Moderately to Heavily Doped Silicon”, pp. 1014-1018, No. 7, vol. ED-26, 1979 IEEE. |
Leiss, et al., “dRAM Design Using the Taper-Isolated Dynamic RAM Cell.” Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of 17.2 (1982): 337-344. |
Lin et al., “A new 1T DRAM Cell with enhanced Floating Body Effect”, pp. 1-5, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Workshop on Memory Technology. |
Ohsawa et al., “Autonomous refresh of floating body cell (FBC)”, Electron Devices Meeting, 2008. IEDM 2008. IEEE International. IEEE 2008, pp. 801-804. |
Oh et al., “A 4-Bit Double SONOS memory (DSM) with 4 Storage Nodes Per Cell for Ultimate Multi-Bit Operation”, pp. 1-2, 2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers. |
Ranica, et al. “A one transistor cell on bulk substrate (1T-Bulk) for low-cost and high density eDRAM.” VLSI Technology, 2004. Digest of Technical Papers. 2004 Symposium on. IEEE, 2004, pp. 128-129. |
Ranica, et al. “Scaled IT-Bulk devices built with CMOS 90nm technology for low-cost eDRAM applications.” VLSI Technology, 2005. Digest of Technical Papers. 2005 Symposium on. IEEE, 2005, pp. 38-39. |
Reisch, “On bistable behavior and open-base breakdown of bipolar transistors in the avalanche regime-modeling and applications.” Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on 39.6 (1992): 1398-1409. |
Sakui et al., “A new static memory cell based on reverse bias current (RBC) effect of bipolar transistor”, Electron Devices Meeting, 1988. IEDM'88. Technical Digest, International IEEE, 1988, pp. 44-47. |
Sakui et al., “A new static memory cell based on the reverse bias current effect of bipolar transistors”, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on 36.6 (1989): 1215-1217. |
Sze et al., “Physics of Semiconductor Devices”, Wiley-Interscience, 2007, p. 104. |
Terada et al., “A new VLSI memory cell using capacitance coupling (CC) cell”, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on 31.9 (1984); pp. 1319-1324. |
Villaret et al., “Further insight into the physics and modeling of floating-body capacitorless DRAMs”, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on 52.11 (2005); pp. 2447-2454. |
Ohsawa et al., “Autonomous refresh of floating-body cell due to Current Anomaly of Impact Ionization”, vol. 56, No. 10, pp. 2301-2311, 2009. |
Ban et al., “A Scaled Floating Body Cell (FBC) memory with High-k+Metal Gate on Thin-Silicon and Thin-BOX fro 16-nm Technology Node and Beyond”, Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2008, pp. 92-93. |
Campardo et al., VLSI Design of Non-Volatile Memories, Springer-Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2005, pp. 94-95. |
Han et al., “Programming/Erasing Characteristics of 45 nm NOR-Type Flash Memory Based on SOI Fin FET Structure”, J. Korean Physical Society, vol. 47, Nov. 2005, pp. S564-S567. |
Headland, Hot electron injection, Feb. 19, 2004. |
Pellizer et al., “A 90 nm Phase Change Memory Technology for Stand-Alone Non-Volatile Memory Applications”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, 2006, pp. 1-2. |
Pierret, Semiconductor Device Fundamentals, ISBN: 0-201-54393-1, 1996, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., PNPN Devices 463-476. |
Tack et al., “The Multistable Charge-Controlled Memory Effect in SOI Transistors at Low Temperatures”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 37, May 1990, pp. 1373-1382. |
Okhonin et al., “A SOI Capacitor-less 1T DRAM Concept”, 2001 IEEE International SOI Conference, pp. 153-154. |
Ohsawa et al., “An 18.5ns 128Mb SOI DRAM with a Floating Body Cell”, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2005, pp. 458-459 and 609. |
Okhonin et al., “Principles of Transient Charge Pumping on Partially Depleted SOI MOSFETs”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 279-281. |
Okhonin et al., “A Capacitor-less 1T DRAM Cell”, IEEE Electron device Letters, vol. 23, No. 2, Feb. 2002, pp. 85-87. |
Ohsawa et al., “Memory Design using One-Transistor Gain Cell on SOI”, Tech. Digest, IEEE Intemataional Solid-State Circuits, vol. 37, No. 11, 2002, pp. 1510-1522. |
Yoshida et al., “A Design of a Capacitorless 1T-DRAM Cell Using Gate-Induced Drain Leakage (GIDL) Current for Low-power and High-speed Embedded Memory”, International Electron Devices Meeting, 2003, pp. 1-4. |
Bawedin et al., “Floating-Body SOI Memory: Concepts, Physics and Challenges”, ECS Transactions 19.4 (2009) pp. 243-256. |
Ban et al., “Integration of Back-Gate doping for 15-nm node floating body cell (FBC) memory”, VLSI Technology (VLSIT), 2010 Symposium on IEEE, 2010, pp. 159-160. |
Chiu et al., “Characteristics of a new trench-oxide thin film transistor and its 1T-DRAM applications”, Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT), 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2010, pp. 1106-1108. |
Chiu et al., “A simple process ot thin-film transistor using the trench-oxide layer for improving 1T-DRAM performance”, Next Generation Electronics (ISNE), 2010 International Symposium on IEEE, 2010, pp. 254-257. |
Chun et al., “A 1.1 V, 667 MHz random cycle, asymmetric 2T gain cell embedded DRAM with a 99.9 percentile retention time of 110 microsec”, VLSI Circuits (VLSIC), 2010 IEEE Symposium on, IEEE, 2010, pp. 191-192. |
Collaert et al., “A low voltage biasing scheme for aggressively scaled bulk FinFET 1T-DRAM featuring 10s retention at 85 C”, VLSI Technology (VLSIT), 2010 Symposium on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 161-162. |
Giusi et al., “Bipolar mode operation and scalability of double-gate capacitorless 1T-DRAM cells”, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, No. 8 (2010), pp. 1743-1750. |
Gupta et al., “32nm high-density, high-speed T-RAM embedded memory technology”, Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2010 IEEE International, IEEE, 2010, pp. 12.1.1-12.1.4. |
Han et al., “Bistable resistor (biristor)-gateless silicon nanowire memory”, VLSI Technology (VLSIT), 2010 Symposium on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 171-172. |
Han et al., “Biristor-bistable resistor based on a silicon nanowire”, Electron Device Letters, IEEE 31.8 (2010), pp. 797-799. |
Hubert et al., “Experimental comparison of programming mechanisms in 1T-DRAM cells with variable channel length”, Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC), 2010 Proceedings of the European., pp. 150-153, Sep. 14-16, 2010. |
Kim et al., “Vertical double gate Z-RAM technology with remarkable low voltage operation for DRAM application”, VLSI Technology (VLSIT), 2010 Symposium on . . , 2010, pp. 163-164. |
Kim et al., “Silicon on replacement insulator (SRI) floating body cell (FBC) memory”, VLSI Technology (VLSIT), 2010 Symposium on . . , IEEE, 2010, pp. 165-166. |
Kim et al., “Investigation of 1T DRAM cell with non-overlap structure and recessed channel”, Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (SNW), 2010, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1-2. |
Lu et al., “A simplified superior floating-body/gate DRAM cell”, IEEE Elec. Dev. Letters, vol. 30, No. 3, Mar. 2009, pp. 282-284. |
Moon et al., “fin-width dependance of BJT-based 1T-DRAM implemented on FinFET”, Electron Device Letters, vol. 31, No. 9 (2010), pp. 909-911. |
Moon et al., “An optically assisted program method for capacitorless 1T-DRAM”, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on . . . . , vol. 57, No. 7, 2010, pp. 1714-1718. |
Moon et al., “Ultimately scaled 20nm unified-RAM”, Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2010 IEEE International, IEEE, 2010, pp. 12.2.1-12.2.4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220115061 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61810433 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16676744 | Nov 2019 | US |
Child | 17548188 | US | |
Parent | 15820869 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 16676744 | US | |
Parent | 15002207 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 15820869 | US | |
Parent | 14250370 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 15002207 | US |