The present application relates to semiconductor devices and circuits, and more particularly, to analog, digital and mixed signal integrated circuits (ICs) that employ Super Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (SCMOS™) devices and thereby exhibit improved device performance due to improvements in power consumption, operating speed, circuit area and device density.
Since the introduction of integrated circuits (ICs), engineers have been trying to increase the density of circuits on ICs, which reduces the cost of manufacturing of said ICs. One approach has been to put more components/functionality onto a chip. A second approach has been to build more chips on a larger wafer to reduce IC costs. For example, silicon wafer sizes have grown from averaging 3 inches in diameter in the 1960s to 12 inches today.
Various attempts were tried in the past to improve IC functionality, performance, and cost figures. Early IC implementations used bipolar junction transistors (BJTs), which have layers of various diffusion regions stacked vertically, and isolated transistor pockets containing the three switching terminals (base, emitter and collector), among other resistive (R) and capacitive (C) circuit elements. However, for the last decade of IC implementations, it was V-I signal and PHY parameter scaling that was used to house more components on a chip.
CMOS technology came after and surpassed BJT technology, which was relatively bulky, provided poor transistor yield, and exhibited high DC power usage. Device complexity has grown to over billions of circuit elements with Complementary MOS (CMOS) constructs. For more than 30 years a reduction in cost and increase in performance of CMOS technology has been achieved by shrinking the physical dimensions of CMOS transistors. These dimensions have shrunken to a size that is only a few molecular layers thick in critical device parameters. However, further shrinking of CMOS is running against limits imposed by the laws of physics. In addition to trying to manufacture tens of billions of these CMOS circuit elements with “molecular” dimensions, these dramatically smaller circuits operate with very low signal (voltage) levels, making their signal integrity susceptible to noise and causing speed degradation, and or power/heat run-off.
In various embodiments, Schottky-CMOS (also referred to herein as “Super CMOS” and SCMOS™) technology is employed to build circuit blocks using Schottky Barrier diodes (SBDs), such as low threshold Schottky Barrier Diodes (LtSBD™s), thereby addressing the above deficiencies and problems associated with an increasing demand for higher semiconductor efficiency and upcoming physical limits on CMOS transistor dimensions.
In some embodiments, an integrated circuit implements a NAND gate system. The integrated circuit includes a first input coupled to a cathode of a first p-type Schottky diode and x additional inputs coupled to x respective cathodes of x additional p-type Schottky diodes. The integrated circuit additionally includes a first n-type transistor including a gate node that is coupled to an anode of the first Schottky diode and x respective anodes of the x additional Schottky diodes. The integrated circuit additionally includes a p-type transistor including a gate node that is coupled to the anode of the first Schottky diode and x respective anodes of the x additional Schottky diodes. The integrated circuit additionally includes a second n-type transistor including a gate node that is coupled to the cathode of the first p-type Schottky diode and x additional n-type transistors including x respective gate nodes that are coupled to the x respective cathodes of the x additional p-type Schottky diodes. An output is coupled to a non-gate node of the first n-type transistor and a non-gate node of the p-type transistor.
In some embodiments, an integrated circuit implements a NOR gate system. The integrated circuit includes a first input coupled to an anode of a first n-type Schottky diode and x additional inputs coupled to x respective anodes of x additional n-type Schottky diodes. The integrated circuit additionally includes a first p-type transistor including a gate node that is coupled to a cathode of the first n-type Schottky diode and a cathode of x additional n-type Schottky diodes. The integrated circuit additionally includes an n-type transistor including a gate node that is coupled to the cathode of the first n-type Schottky diode and the cathodes of the x additional n-type Schottky diodes. The integrated circuit additionally includes a second p-type transistor including a gate node that is coupled to the anode of the first n-type Schottky diode and x additional p-type transistors including x respective gate nodes that are coupled to the x respective anodes of the x additional n-type Schottky diodes. An output is coupled to a non-gate node of the first p-type transistor and a non-gate node of the n-type transistor.
In some embodiments, an integrated circuit implements an x-input logic gate. The integrated circuit includes a plurality of Schottky diodes that includes x Schottky diodes and a plurality of source-follower transistors that includes x source-follower transistors. Each respective source-follower transistor of the plurality of source-follower transistors includes a respective gate node that is coupled to a respective Schottky diode. A first source-follower transistor of the plurality of source-follower transistors is connected serially to a second source-follower transistor of the plurality of source-follower transistors.
Various advantages of the disclosed technology will be apparent in light of the descriptions below.
The aforementioned features and advantages of the disclosure as well as additional features and advantages thereof will be more clearly understood hereinafter as a result of a detailed description of preferred embodiments when taken in conjunction with the drawings.
To illustrate the technical solutions according to the embodiments of the present disclosure more clearly, the accompanying drawings needed for the embodiments are introduced briefly below. The appended drawings, however, merely illustrate the more pertinent features of the present disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting, for the description may admit to other effective features.
Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the subject matter presented herein. But it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the subject matter may be practiced or designed without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments. Trademarks designated herein with the “TM” symbol are the property of Schottky LSI, Inc.
The technical solution of the present disclosure will be clearly and completely described in the following with reference to the accompanying drawings. It is obvious that the embodiments to be described are examples and only a part rather than all of the embodiments of the present disclosure. All other embodiments obtained by persons skilled in the art based on the described embodiments of the present disclosure shall fall within the protection scope of the present disclosure.
The Schottky-CMOS technology described herein implements logic using a Schottky Barrier diode (also referred to herein as “SBD” and “Schottky diode”). In comparison with prior CMOS implementations, various embodiments of the Schottky-CMOS described herein use Schottky diodes in lieu of p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (PMOS) field effect transistors and/or n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) field effect transistors. Particularly as the number of logic inputs to a logic gate increases, replacing PMOS and NMOS transistors with Schottky diodes increases the efficiency of the implemented logic in various ways, including reduced area consumed by the circuit layout, reduced propagation delay, and reduced power required for switching.
The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
In some embodiments, the two-input Schottky-CMOS NAND gate includes feedback logic that receives the output signal as an input at gate nodes of n-type transistor 120 and p-type transistor 122.
Whereas a CMOS implementation of a two-input NAND gate would use a p-type transistor and an n-type transistor coupled to each input of the NAND gate, in some embodiments, the Schottky-CMOS implementation of the two-input NAND gate uses a p-type SBD and an n-type transistor coupled to each input (replacing a p-type transistor of the CMOS implementation with a p-type SBD in the Schottky-CMOS implementation). As the number of inputs in the NAND gate increases, the efficiencies attained by replacing transistors with SBDs increases, e.g., as illustrated by the CMOS and Schottky-CMOS performance comparisons of
Anodes of SBDs 202-216 are coupled to the gates of result transistors 236 and 238. Result transistor 236 is an n-type transistor and result transistor 238 is a p-type transistor. Output 240 is coupled to non-gate nodes of the result transistors 236 and 238. Specifically, output 240 is coupled to the drain node of n-type transistor 236 and output 240 is coupled to the drain node of p-type transistor 238.
In some embodiments, the eight-input Schottky-CMOS NAND gate includes feedback logic that receives the output signal as an input at gate nodes of n-type transistor 242 and p-type transistor 244.
It will be recognized that the scaling illustrated with regard to
For example, a four-input Schottky-CMOS NAND gate includes four inputs A0-A3, four p-type SBDs (e.g., configured as illustrated by SBDs 202-208 of
In some embodiments, a Schottky-CMOS NAND gate includes a number of inputs between two inputs and sixteen inputs, such as twelve inputs.
In some embodiments, the two-input Schottky-CMOS NOR gate includes feedback logic that receives the output signal as an input at gate nodes of n-type transistor 420 and p-type transistor 422.
Whereas a CMOS implementation of a two-input NOR gate would use a p-type transistor and an n-type transistor coupled to each input of the NOR gate, in some embodiments, the Schottky-CMOS implementation of the two-input NOR gate uses a n-type SBD and a p-type transistor coupled to each input (replacing an n-type transistor of the prior CMOS implementation with an n-type SBD in the Schottky-CMOS implementation). As the number of inputs in the NOR gate increases, the efficiencies attained by replacing transistors with SBDs increases.
Cathodes of SBDs 502-516 are coupled to the gates of result transistors 536 and 538. Result transistor 536 is an n-type transistor and result transistor 538 is a p-type transistor. Output 540 is coupled to non-gate nodes of the result transistors 536 and 538. Specifically, output 540 is coupled to the drain node of n-type transistor 536 and output 540 is coupled to the drain node of p-type transistor 538.
In some embodiments, the eight-input Schottky-CMOS NOR gate includes feedback logic that receives the output signal as an input at gate nodes of n-type transistor 542 and p-type transistor 544.
It will be recognized that the scaling illustrated with regard to
For example, a four-input Schottky-CMOS NOR gate includes four inputs A0-A3, four n-type SBDs (e.g., configured as illustrated by SBDs 502-508 of
In some embodiments, a Schottky-CMOS NOR gate includes a number of inputs between two inputs and sixteen inputs, such as twelve inputs.
In some embodiments, the Schottky-CMOS logic described with regard to
In some embodiments, one or more SBDs of the Schottky-CMOS logic described with regard to
As can be seen from
As described above with regard to the CMOS NAND gates of
While particular embodiments are described above, it will be understood it is not intended to limit the disclosure to these particular embodiments. On the contrary, the disclosure includes alternatives, modifications and equivalents that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the subject matter presented herein. But it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the subject matter may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments.
The terminology used in the description of the disclosure herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used in the description of the disclosure and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will also be understood that the term “and/or” as used herein refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. It will be further understood that the terms “includes,” “including,” “comprises,” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
As used herein, the term “if” may be construed to mean “when” or “upon” or “in response to determining” or “in accordance with a determination” or “in response to detecting,” that a stated condition precedent is true, depending on the context. Similarly, the phrase “if it is determined [that a stated condition precedent is true]” or “if [a stated condition precedent is true]” or “when [a stated condition precedent is true]” may be construed to mean “upon determining” or “in response to determining” or “in accordance with a determination” or “upon detecting” or “in response to detecting” that the stated condition precedent is true, depending on the context.
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the disclosure and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/883,753, filed May 26, 2020, entitled “Schottky-CMOS Asynchronous Logic Cells,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/817,026, filed Nov. 17, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,666,260, entitled “Schottky-CMOS Asynchronous Logic Cells,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/484,040, filed Apr. 10, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,853,643, entitled, “Schottky-CMOS Asynchronous Logic Cells,” both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/484,040 is a continuation-in-part of PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/055020, filed Oct. 9, 2015, entitled, “SUPER CMOS (SCMOS™) DEVICES ON A MICROELECTRONIC SYSTEM,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/062,800, filed Oct. 10, 2014, entitled, “SUPER CMOS (SCMOS) DEVICES ON A MICROELECTRONIC SYSTEM,” both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/484,040 is also a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/358,049, filed Nov. 21, 2016, entitled, “SUPER CMOS DEVICES ON A MICROELECTRONICS SYSTEM,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,806,072, issued Oct. 31, 2017, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/358,049 is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/793,690, filed Jul. 7, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,502,379, entitled, “SUPER CMOS DEVICES ON A MICROELECTRONICS SYSTEM,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/062,800, filed Oct. 10, 2014, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/793,690 is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/931,315, filed Jun. 28, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,077,340, entitled, “SUPER CMOS DEVICES ON A MICROELECTRONICS SYSTEM,” which is a divisional application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/343,465, filed Dec. 23, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,476,689 entitled, “SUPER CMOS DEVICES ON A MICROELECTRONICS SYSTEM,” all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3508211 | Wegener | Apr 1970 | A |
3978577 | Bhattacharyya et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4005469 | Chang et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4050058 | Garlic | Sep 1977 | A |
4129790 | Gani et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4300064 | Eden | Nov 1981 | A |
4336601 | Tanaka | Jun 1982 | A |
4400636 | Andrade | Aug 1983 | A |
4405870 | Eden | Sep 1983 | A |
4415817 | Fletcher | Nov 1983 | A |
4507575 | Mori et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4544939 | Kosonocky et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4609903 | Toyokura et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4709166 | Banker et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4931670 | Ting | Jun 1990 | A |
5010377 | Beasom | Apr 1991 | A |
5023482 | Bellavance | Jun 1991 | A |
5313090 | Morikawa | May 1994 | A |
5407851 | Roesner | Apr 1995 | A |
5581503 | Matsubara et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5663584 | Welch | Sep 1997 | A |
5665993 | Keller et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6025840 | Taylor | Feb 2000 | A |
6036101 | Hass et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6184726 | Haeberli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6442633 | Chang | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6590000 | Varadaraj | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6590800 | Chang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6627697 | Barney et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6777277 | Asano et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6852578 | Chang | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7082056 | Chen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7135890 | Chang | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7375547 | Shimura | May 2008 | B2 |
7375548 | Chang | May 2008 | B2 |
7528017 | Subramanian et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7683433 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7932537 | Subramanian et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8212175 | D'Angelo et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8476689 | Chang | Jul 2013 | B2 |
9077340 | Chang | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9806072 | Chang | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10373950 | Chang | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10991686 | Chang | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11342916 | Chang | May 2022 | B2 |
11658178 | Chang | May 2023 | B2 |
20030002321 | Chang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025175 | Asano et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040012053 | Zhang | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040159910 | Fried et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050062071 | Matsuzawa et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050231237 | Chang | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060044018 | Chang | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060113624 | Wu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060279321 | Ruppender | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018692 | Chang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070120201 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070170520 | Chang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080002454 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036503 | Chang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080061824 | Chang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080107974 | Douzaka | May 2008 | A1 |
20090262563 | Park | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100155782 | Chang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100228377 | D'Angelo et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110204381 | Okada et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110292738 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20140152343 | Chang | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2054955 | Feb 1981 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Ashby, L, et al., ASIC Clock Distribution Using a Phase Locked Loop (PLL), Motorola AN1509, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, US, Sep. 1991 (Abstract). |
Chang, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/343,465, dated Mar. 21, 2011, 10 pgs. |
Chang, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/343,465, dated Nov. 28, 2011, 5 pgs. |
Chang, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/343,465, dated Oct. 1, 2012, 10 pgs. |
Chang, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/343,465, dated Mar. 30, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Chang, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/343,465, dated Mar. 4, 2013, 5 pgs. |
Chang, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/793,690, dated Feb. 22, 2016, 6 pgs. |
Chang, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/358,049, dated Mar. 10, 2017, 6 pgs. |
Chang, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/358,049, dated Jun. 29, 2017, 5 pgs. |
Chang, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/484,040, dated Aug. 16, 2017, 9 pgs. |
Chang, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/817,026, dated Nov. 27, 2018, 15 pgs. |
Chang, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/817,026, dated Jul. 11, 2019, 15 pgs. |
Chang, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/799,921, dated Oct. 31, 2018, 7 pgs. |
Chang, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/799,921, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 8 pgs. |
Fuller, “Solar Cell Notes from Sze”, PN Junction Cell, CdS cell, Raynolds Sigle/Poly Si Crystal and Amorphous Thin Film, US, 1954, 17 pgs. |
Gerrits, J., et al., Modeling and Simulation of a Dipole Antenna for UWB Applications Using Equivalent Spice Circuits, Centre Suisse d'Eiectronique et de Microtechnique SA (CSEM), Neuchatei-Switzerland, 2003, 5 pgs. |
Katz, David, et al., Fundamentals of Embedded Audio, Part 1, DSP Design Line, Analog Devices, Sep. 3, 2007, 8 pgs. |
Katz, David, et al., Fundamentals of Embedded Audio, Part 2, DSP Design Line, Analog Devices, Sep. 10, 2007, 12 pgs. |
Katz, David, et al., Fundamentals of Embedded Audio, Part 3, DSP Design Line, Video Imaging Design Line, Sep. 17, 2007, 8 pgs. |
Liu, Yang, et al., IC/Microfluidic Hybrid System for Biology 2005: Review, (Invited Paper) IEEE BCTM10.4, 2005, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, US, 8 pgs. |
Schottky LSI, Inc., International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/055020, dated Jan. 27, 2016, 9 pgs. |
Schottky LSI, Inc., International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2015/055020, dated Apr. 11, 2017, 7 pgs. |
Schottky LSI, Inc., Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162-EP15849239.7, dated Jun. 2, 2017, 2 pgs. |
Schottky LSI, Inc., Extended European Search Report. EP15849239.7, dated May 8, 2018, 13 pgs. |
Yang, Jeffrey, et al., “A-Si Solar Cell White Paper, Amorphous Silicon Based Photovoltaics—From Earth to the Final Frontier”, US, 2003, 10 pgs. |
Yang, Jeffrey, et al., Amorphous Silicon Based Photovoltaics—From Earth to the “Final Frontier”, 78 2003 pp. 597-612, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, US, pp. 23-1 thru 23-24. |
Zhu, Z., et al., Brief Comparison of Different Rectifier Structures for RFID Transponders, Auto-ID Lab at University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia 2004, pp. 1-16. |
Chang, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/532,227, dated Feb. 20, 2020, 6 pgs. |
Chang, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/532,227, dated Sep. 17, 2020, 9 pgs. |
Chang, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/532,227, dated Jan. 27, 2021, 8 pgs. |
Chang, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/242,131, dated Sep. 15, 2022, 7 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220286134 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62062800 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12343465 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 13931315 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16883753 | May 2020 | US |
Child | 17752673 | US | |
Parent | 15817026 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 16883753 | US | |
Parent | 15484040 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 15817026 | US | |
Parent | 14793690 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15358049 | US | |
Parent | 13931315 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 14793690 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15358049 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 15484040 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2015/055020 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15358049 | US |