Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a selection assisting technique for a grip of a golf club.
Description of the Related Art
Golfers are more and more increasing the tendency to obtain golf clubs more suitable for themselves. Therefore, methods of recommending components of golf clubs suitable for individual golfers have been proposed (for example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2002-119621, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-511045, U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,579,731, 8,057,327, and 4,272,077, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2014/378238, and U.S. Pat. No. 8,926,454).
Of the components of a golf club, a grip is generally selected based on the size of the hand of a golfer. However, the characteristics of the grip sometimes have influence on a golfer's swing.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a mechanism capable of recommending a grip suitable for a golfer's swing.
According the present invention, there is provided a selection assisting method comprising: a first selection step of selecting a recommended grip from a plurality of types of grips based on information on a hand size of a testing golfer; a measurement step of measuring by using a measurement device a swing characteristic of the testing golfer in a shot by using a golf club to which the recommended grip selected in the first selection step is attached; and a second selection step of selecting a recommended grip from the plurality of types of grips based on a measurement result in the measurement step.
Further features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments (with reference to the attached drawings).
<First Embodiment>
A selection assisting method according to an embodiment of the present invention will be explained below. This embodiment includes steps of preparing a plurality of testing clubs, and selecting a recommended grip based on the test shot results of the testing clubs. First, the testing clubs will be explained with reference to
In this embodiment, a recommended grip is selected from the seven types of grips G1 to G7. However, the types of grips are not limited to seven types, and may also be eight or more types, or six or less types.
Grips G1 to G5 are mainly different in grip thickness. Grip G1 is the thinnest grip, and grip G5 is the thickest grip. Grips G6 and G7 are mainly different in shape. This embodiment shows a taper as an example of the grip shape. A taper means the degree of a change in grip diameter from rearmost position 0 to frontmost position 10. A grip having a large difference between the diameters of the rearmost and frontmost ends is called a grip having a strong taper, and a grip having a small difference is called a grip having a weak taper. Grip G6 is a grip having a relatively weak taper, and has a taper weaker than that of grips G1 to G5. Grip G7 is a grip having a relatively strong taper, and has a taper stronger than that of grips G1 to G5. From the viewpoint of thickness, grips G6 and G7 are so designed as to have a thickness close to that of grip G3. Examples of elements characterizing a grip type are the weight, the hardness, and the presence/absence of a backline, in addition to the thickness and shape.
The selection assisting method of this embodiment will be explained with reference to
Note that the information on the hand size of the testing golfer may also be a measured value of the hand size of the testing golfer, instead of the glove size.
Referring to
The recommended grip selected in step S2 is a grip having a thickness fitting the hand size of the testing golfer. Depending on the swing characteristic of the testing golfer, however, a grip different from this grip may be more suitable for the testing golfer. In step S3, therefore, the testing golfer actually strikes a golf ball by using a golf club to which the recommended grip selected in step S2 is attached, and the swing characteristic of the testing golfer is measured. For example, if the recommended grip selected in step S2 is grip G2, the testing golfer makes a test shot by using golf club #2 shown in
As a measurement device, it is possible to use a device which measures the motion of a golf club being swung (for example, the motion of the head 1), or a device which measures the motion of a struck ball.
The measurement device shown in
The measurement device shown in
In this embodiment, the swing characteristic measured in step S3 is the direction of a face (an impact face angle) at impact.
Referring to
If the face 1a opens at impact, a struck ball slices. On the other hand, a golf club having a thin grip facilitates face rotation, so the face 1a readily closes at impact. Accordingly, as the face 1a is more open, a grip to be selected becomes thinner. In the example shown in
If the face 1a closes at impact, a struck bail hooks. On the other hand, a golf club having a thick grip suppresses face rotation, thereby suppressing closing of the face 1a at impact. Therefore, as the face 1a is more closed, a grip to be selected becomes thicker. In the example shown in
In the example shown in
The threshold values +a and −b shown in
The threshold values are two, that is, +a and −b in this embodiment, but they may also be three or more. In this case, as the absolute value of the angle θfa increases, it is possible to increase the change in grade of thickness with respect to the recommended grip selected in step S2. For example, as the angle θfa increases, a grip thinner by two or three grades can be selected as a recommended grip. Likewise, as the angle θfa decreases, a grip thicker by two or three grades can be selected as a recommended grip.
Depending on the swing characteristic of the testing golfer, grip G6 or G7 is sometimes more suitable than grips G1 to G5. In step S5, therefore, the testing golfer practically strikes a golf ball by using a golf club to which the recommended grip selected in step S4 is attached, thereby remeasuring the swing characteristic of the testing golfer. For example, if the recommended club selected in step S4 is grip G3, the testing golfer makes a test shot again by using golf club #3 shown in
In this embodiment, the swing characteristic measured in step S5 differs from that measured in step S3. In step S5 of this embodiment, the degree of the change in direction of the face (a face change rate) with respect to the moving direction of the head is measured in the moving range (impact zone) of the head from the impact position to a position at a predetermined distance before the impact position.
As shown in
A direction D of the face 1a with respect to the moving direction d of the head 1 is represented by D=θfa−θh. When the direction D is calculated at a plurality of positions in the impact zone and plotted on a coordinate plane in which the position of the head 1 in the Y-axis direction and the direction D are the coordinate axes as shown in
Referring to
A golf club which facilitates face rotation is suitable for a testing golfer having a large face rotation. A Golf club to which a grip having a strong taper is attached increases the playability and facilitates face rotation. Accordingly, as the degree of the change in direction of the face increases, a grip having a stronger taper is recommended. In the example shown in
A golf club which hardly changes the direction of the face 1a is suitable for a testing golfer having a small face rotation. A golf club to which a grip having a weak taper is attached decreases the playability and hardly causes face rotation. Therefore, as the degree of the change in direction of the face decreases, a grip having a weaker taper is recommended. In the example shown in
In the example shown in
The threshold values −c and −d shown in
Thus, the grip selected in step S6 is a final recommended grip. This makes it possible to recommend a grip fitting the hand size of a golfer and suited to the swing of the golfer.
<Second Embodiment>
In the first embodiment, a final recommended grip is selected by three stages (steps S2, S4, and S6) based on the glove size (step S1), swing characteristic (step S3), and swing characteristic (step S5). However, a final recommended grip may also be selected by two stages. For example, the recommended grip selected in step S4 may also be selected as a final recommended grip by omitting steps S5 and S6. It is also possible to select a final recommended grip by two stages by omitting, for example, steps S3 and S4. More specifically, it is possible to perform a test shot and measurement as in step S5 by using a golf club to which the recommended grip selected in step S2 is attached, and select, as a final recommended grip, a grip selected by the same method as in step S6,
<Third Embodiment>
In the first embodiment, a recommended grip is selected based on the impact face angle in step S4. However, it is also possible to measure the side-spin amount of a struck ball in step S3, and select a recommended grip based on the side-spin amount of the struck ball in step S4. When selecting a recommended grip based on the side-spin amount, it is possible to select a thinner grip if a sliced side-spin amount is equal to or larger than a first threshold value, and select a thicker grip if a hooked side-spin amount is equal to or larger than a second threshold value. The first and second threshold values can be the same value or different values.
Furthermore, in the first embodiment, a recommended grip is selected based on the face change rate in step S6. However, it is also possible to measure the angular velocity around the shaft 2 in the impact zone in step S5, and select a recommended grip based on the angular velocity around the shaft 2 in step S6. In this case, a grip having a stronger taper can be selected if the angular velocity is equal to or higher than a first threshold value, and a grip having a weaker taper can be selected if the angular velocity is equal to or lower than a second threshold value. The first and second threshold values can be the same value or different values.
<Fourth Embodiment>
In the first embodiment, a recommended grip is selected based on one type of swing characteristic in step S4. However, a recommended grip may also be selected based on a plurality of types of swing characteristics. Similarly, a recommended grip is selected based on one type of swing characteristic in step S6, but a recommended grip may also be selected based on a plurality of types of swing characteristics. Examples of the swing characteristic are the head speed and the head orbit in the impact zone, in addition to the above-described swing characteristics.
<Fifth Embodiment>
An example of a selection assisting apparatus which performs at least some steps of the above-described selection assisting method will be explained below.
An input device 14, measurement device (not shown), display device 15, and the like are connected to the selection assisting apparatus 10 via the interface 13. The input device 14 includes a keyboard, mouse, and the like, and inputs information on the hand size of a testing golfer, for example, the glove size. The CPU 11 can receive this information, and perform automatic recommended grip selection in step 82 based on the selection information 12a. The CPU 11 can also receive information on the swing characteristic from the measurement device (not shown), and perform automatic recommended grip selection in step S4 or S6 based on the selection information 12a. As the measurement device, the same device as that shown in
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-103996, filed May 21, 2015, which is hereby incorporated, by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2015-103996 | May 2015 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4272077 | Spivey | Jun 1981 | A |
8057327 | Todd | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8579731 | Gadiyar | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8926454 | Solheim | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9403059 | Johannesen | Aug 2016 | B1 |
20030008731 | Anderson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20060287118 | Wright | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090088276 | Solheim | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131189 | Swartz | May 2009 | A1 |
20140378238 | Voges et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001-511045 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-119621 | Apr 2002 | JP |
9834684 | Aug 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160339313 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |