The present invention relates in general to fabricating semiconductor devices, and particularly to controlling oxide formation during reoxidation.
Advancing technology continues to pressure manufacturers to produce complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) devices with both greater capacities and smaller profiles. To counteract the resulting parasitic effects caused by resistance/capacitance delays in gate electrodes in such down-scaled devices, there is a continual quest for new combinations of materials from which to fabricate gate structures. For example, in W/WNx/Poly-Si Gate Technology for Future High Speed Deep Submicron CMOS LSls, 497-500 IEDM 1994, K. Kasai et al. describe a structure comprising tungsten, tungsten nitride and polysilicon (W/WNx/PolySi). This structure has a greatly reduced sheet resistance and enables improved performance of the CMOS device. The structure proposed by Kasai et al. is, however, limited because the structure is only able to withstand temperatures up to 900° C. for 30 seconds or less during rapid thermal annealing. Proper source/drain reoxidation requires temperatures at or above 900° C. for at least fifteen minutes. To date, where the W/WNx/PolySi structure is used, after source/drain reoxidation the wordline profile exhibits a considerable protuberance on the exposed tungsten silicide (WSix). This complicates subsequent etches, and the undesirable “spacer” implants from the gate edge decrease device performance.
In conventional processing, a conductive gate electrode is patterned into fine features by photo/etch processing. This electrode is subsequently subjected to reoxidation to repair physical damage caused by the etch process in one of two ways: either directly or through a deposited silicon dioxide spacer. For a tungsten silicide feature, this reoxidation results in SiO2 growth on the polysilicon and silicide. Other choices for metal shunt layers of polysilicon include materials such as tungsten, titanium silicide and molybdenum. As described by Robert Beyers in Thermodynamic considerations in refractory metal silicon-oxygen systems, 147-52 Journal of Applied Physics 56(1), (July, 1984), these metals, when oxidized, result in unstable metal oxides. This is because, unlike tungsten silicide, there is little or no silicon available for oxidation into SiO2.
As a result, there remains a need to be able to tap the potential of devices manufactured from materials such as tungsten and minire the detrimental effects resulting from the formation of oxide.
The primary object of the present invention is to eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art.
This invention proposes a method for forming an encapsulating spacer for protecting a refractory metal or polycide from fomiing metal oxide formation during gate stack reoxidation. According to one embodiment an encapsulating spacer is formed prior to gate stack reoxidation to prevent undesirable formation of metal oxides during this oxidation process. In another embodiment either a thin silicon nitride or amorphous silicon film is selectively deposited after gate stack patterning over a gate stack without any deposition on the active areas. This selective deposition will result in a thin film of insulating material over the gate stack which will prevent metal oxide formation during polycide (source/drain) reoxidation.
The present invention describes an improvement in the one-spacer approach because it allows source/drain reoxidation after patterning. Conventional processes using tungsten or tungsten nitride experience a “rabbit ear” problem of tungsten reoxidation after any thermal cycle more intensive than rapid thermal annealing performed at temperatures higher than 900° C.
The present invention also describes an improvement in the two-spacer approach, simplifying the double spacer deposition/etch sequence into a sequence comprising two depositions and one etch. Yet another embodiment of the present invention encapsulates refractory metal from uncontrollable oxidation during source/drain reoxidation after gate patterning.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
In conventional processing, reoxidizing a device results in silicon dioxide growth on both polysilicon and silicide features. As mentioned above, this creates an unacceptably deformed wordline profile. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the deformation is minimized by selective spacer formation on the sidewalls of tungsten silicide features. The spacer minimizes oxidation and the subsequent degradation of the feature.
Once the spacer is deposited, the device undergoes polycide reoxidation 220. Because the spacer is selectively deposited there is no need for an additional etch step to remove excess spacer material. The oxidation process forms smile 225, and active area 215 and selective spacers 210 are reoxidized 220. As can be seen, the metal portion of electrode 205 is protected by spacers 210 and thus is not subjected to the high temperature oxygen environment. Selective spacer 210 acts as a diffusion barrier preventing oxygen from reaching metal layers of electrode 205. Subsequently, an additional spacer may be deposited to the desired spacer thickness of several hundred angstroms, setting the lateral dimension of the transistor's source/drain diffusion. As shown in
The net result is that the additional step of protecting the feature can be performed though modifying process parameters and without adding any further steps to the overall process. The process described enables devices fabricated from materials such as tungsten to be more fully exploited, minimizing detrimental effects resulting from the formation of oxide, and all without increasing the cost or complexity of the fabrication process. For example, if one spacer is desired source/drain reoxidation may be performed after patterning. In contrast, conventional processes (such as the W/WNx stack described in the paper by Kasai et al.), will show a “rabbit ear” problem of tungsten reoxidation after a thermal cycle.
In a two-spacer approach, the method of the present invention simplifies the double spacer deposition/etch sequence into two deposition and one etch sequence. According to one embodiment, during sourceldrain reoxidation the refractory metal exposed by patterning is encapsulated, protecting the metal from uncontrollable oxidation. In contrast, conventional processing requires a deposition and etch step for each spacer before source/drain oxidation can be performed.
Is it to be recognized that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determiined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4711701 | McLevige | Dec 1987 | A |
4774201 | Woo et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5032530 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5087584 | Wada et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5103272 | Nishiyama | Apr 1992 | A |
5146291 | Watabe et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5175606 | Tsai et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5235204 | Tsai | Aug 1993 | A |
5268330 | Givens et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5272367 | Dennison et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5364804 | Ho et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371026 | Hayden et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382551 | Thakur et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5397722 | Bashir et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5422291 | Clementi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425392 | Thakur et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438016 | Figura et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439838 | Yang | Aug 1995 | A |
5459345 | Okudaira et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5468665 | Lee et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5480830 | Liao et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5526306 | Hikawa et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5538906 | Aoki | Jul 1996 | A |
5545578 | Park et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5583368 | Kenney | Dec 1996 | A |
5597756 | Fazan et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608249 | Gonzalez | Mar 1997 | A |
5624865 | Schuegraf et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5668394 | Lur et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681768 | Smayling et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5707898 | Keller et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5739066 | Pan | Apr 1998 | A |
5796151 | Hsu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804838 | Manning | Sep 1998 | A |
5925918 | Wu et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929494 | Li | Jul 1999 | A |
5998290 | Wu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6075274 | Wu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6350708 | Hurley | Feb 2002 | B1 |