SEM inspection and analysis of patterned photoresist features

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6774365
  • Patent Number
    6,774,365
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 28, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 10, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A process for improving the accuracy of critical dimension measurements of features patterned on a photoresist layer using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) is disclosed herein. The process includes providing an electron beam to the photoresist layer and transforming the surface of the photoresist layer before the SEM inspection. The surface of the photoresist layer is transformed to trap the outgassing volatile species and dissipates built up charge in the photoresist layer, resulting in SEM images without poor image contrast.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to integrated circuits (ICs). More particularly, the present application relates to a method and apparatus for improved scanning electron microscope (SEM) inspection and analysis of patterned photoresist features utilized to fabricate ICs.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




During integrated circuit (IC) fabrication, various surfaces involved therein are inspected and analyzed for a variety of reasons. For example, the dimensions of features provided on a given surface may be measured and/or their alignment with respect to other features may be analyzed. Features provided on a given surface may be inspected for uniformity, integrity and/or defects. A semiconductor substrate, photoresist feature, or a layer above the semiconductor substrate can be inspected.




The semiconductor substrate or a layer above the semiconductor substrate, collectively, a semiconductor wafer, may be inspected to determine whether further processing should continue, whether the wafer should be discarded, or whether an appropriate corrective measure should be taken before further processing of the wafer continues. In this manner, the likelihood of defects occurring during the IC fabrication process can be decreased or eliminated.




Various techniques can be utilized to inspect and analyze the wafer. Optical microscopes, scanning electron microscopes (SEMs), or laser-based systems may be utilized for inspection and measurement tasks. Some of the tasks require human involvement and others are fully automated so that human involvement is unnecessary.




Layers or surfaces which are present on the wafer only during the IC fabrication process (i.e., layers or surfaces which do not comprise the end product IC) are also commonly inspected. For example, layers of photoresist material can be inspected following development (after-develop-inspection or “ADI”) to ensure that the pattern transfer process has been performed correctly and/or that the pattern is within specified tolerances. From such inspection, mistakes or unacceptable process variations associated with the layer of photoresist material can be identified and corrected since the layer of photoresist material has not yet been utilized to produce any physical changes to the wafer itself, such as, by doping, etching, etc. Defective layers of photoresist material can be corrected by stripping and reapplying a new layer of photoresist material on the wafer.




Critical dimensions of patterned features on a layer of photoresist material are commonly measured using an SEM inspection and analysis tool. This measurement task involves obtaining SEM images of the patterned features. The SEM inspection and analysis tool obtains SEM images of a given sample using an inspection electron beam, the inspection electron beam characterized by a low beam current (on the order of pA) and an accelerating voltage of approximately 300-1500 V. The sample is rapidly scanned by the inspection electron beam so as to obtain imaging data but not long enough to intentionally affect the sample.




The SEM inspection and analysis tool includes an electron gun, one or more lens assemblies, and photomultiplier detectors, all within a vacuum environment at approximately 10


−7


Torr. Electrons emitted from the electron gun, i.e., the inspection electron beam, are focused by the lens assemblies to form primary electrons that impinge on a sample to be imaged (e.g., the patterned layer of photoresist material). The interaction of the impinging primary electrons with the surface of the sample causes secondary electrons to be emitted from the sample. The secondary electrons are generated from the top portion of the sample, within a depth of approximately 50-60 Å from the top surface. These secondary electrons are collected by the photomultiplier detectors and comprise the imaging data from which SEM images are generated.




However, when the photoresist material is an organic-based photoresist material, SEM images of features patterned thereon are susceptible to poor image contrast, and this in turn may lead to erroneous critical dimension measurements. SEM images with degraded image contrast are caused by undesirable interaction of the primary electrons with the sample (e.g., the organic-based photoresist material). Instead of merely causing secondary electrons to be emitted from the organic-based photoresist material, the primary electrons may also cause volatile organic species to be emitted or outgassed from the organic-based photoresist material (i.e., the outgassing problem). These volatile organic species interact with and scatter the secondary electrons such that the secondary electrons that are collected by the photomultiplier detectors are distorted imaging data representative of the patterned features on the photoresist material. Consequently SEM images generated therefrom are less than ideal, such as, suffering from degraded image contrast.




Additionally, organic-based photoresist materials have a tendency to build up charge and/or heat from the impinging primary electrons (i.e., the charging and heating problems). Organic-based photoresist materials exhibit insulative properties and can build up charge and/or beat from the beam current of the primary electrons. Because the constituents comprising the organic-based photoresist material have varying insulative properties with respect to each other, charge and/or heat dissipation is also non-uniform and/or insignificant. When excessive charge and/or heat builds up within the material, structural or physical changes can occur such that patterned features may become permanently distorted and damaged. Hence, not only are the SEM images inaccurate but subsequent pattern transfer to underlying layers of the wafer is also adversely impacted. As features are lithographically patterned at ever decreasing dimensions, the outgassing, charging, and/or heating problems associated with SEM imaging of organic-based photoresist surfaces are becoming progressively worse.




Thus, there is a need for improved SEM inspection and analysis of patterned features on a layer of photoresist material. There is a further need for a process for reducing charging and/or heating problems associated with SEM imaging of organic-based photoresist materials. There is still a further need for a process for reducing undesirable outgassing problems associated with SEM imaging of organic-based photoresist materials.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




One exemplary embodiment relates to a method of inspecting a surface associated with manufacture of an integrated circuit. The method includes providing an electron beam to the surface, and transforming at least a portion of the surface. The method further includes inspecting the surface using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The transforming step occurs before the inspecting step.




Another exemplary embodiment relates to a patterned photoresist layer. The layer is configured to facilitate accurate critical dimension measurements of features thereon using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The layer includes a treated region and an untreated region. The treated region comprises a top surface and side surfaces surrounding the untreated region. The treated region has at least one of a different electrical and material property relative to the untreated region.




Still another exemplary embodiment relates to a process for reducing the build up of at least one of charge, heat, and volatile species in a photoresist layer during scanning electron microscope (SEM) inspection. The process includes exposing the photoresist layer to a flood electron beam, and forming a shell in the photoresist layer in response to the flood electron beam. The photoresist layer includes at least one patterned feature having a top surface, side surfaces, and an untreated portion. The shell is comprised of the top surface and the side surfaces. The shell reduces the build up of at least one of charge, heat, and volatile species associated with at least one feature during SEM inspection.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The exemplary embodiments will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, in which:





FIG. 1

is a flow diagram showing a process for obtaining accurate critical dimension measurements in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;





FIG. 2

is a general schematic block diagram of a lithographic system for patterning a wafer in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view of the wafer illustrated in

FIG. 2

, showing a developing step;





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of the wafer illustrated in

FIG. 3

, showing an electron beam exposure step; and





FIG. 5

is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis and inspection tool in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS




In one embodiment of the present invention, an advantageous process for obtaining accurate critical dimension (CD) measurements of features patterned on a photoresist layer during an integrated circuit (IC) fabrication is provided. An exemplary embodiment of the present invention will be described with respect to a flow diagram shown in FIG.


1


. The flow diagram includes a patterning step


40


, a developing step


42


, an electron beam exposure step


44


, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis and inspection step


46


, and a critical dimension measurements step


48


.




Patterning step


40


is carried out using a lithography system


10


, as shown in FIG.


2


. Lithographic system


10


includes a chamber


12


, a light source


14


, a condenser lens assembly


16


, a mask or a reticle


18


, an objective lens assembly


20


, and a stage


22


. Lithographic system


10


is configured to transfer a pattern or image provided on mask or reticle


18


to a wafer


24


positioned in lithography system


10


. Lithographic system


10


may be a lithographic camera or stepper unit. For example, lithographic system


10


may be a PAS 5500/900 series machine manufactured by ASML, a microscan DUV system manufactured by Silicon Valley Group, or an XLS family microlithography system manufactured by Integrated Solutions, Inc. of Korea.




Wafer


24


includes a substrate


26


, a layer


28


, and a photoresist layer


30


. Photoresist layer


30


is disposed over layer


28


, and layer


28


is disposed over substrate


26


. Wafer


24


can be an entire integrated circuit (IC) wafer or a part of an IC wafer. Wafer


24


can be a part of an IC, such as, a memory, a processing unit, an input/output device, etc. Substrate


26


can be a semiconductor substrate, such as, silicon, gallium arsenide, germanium, or other substrate material. Substrate


26


can include one or more layers of material and/or features, such as lines, interconnects, vias, doped regions, etc., and can further include devices, such as, transistors, microactuators, microsensors, capacitors, resistors, diodes, etc.




Layer


28


can be an insulative layer, a conductive layer, a barrier layer, or other layer of material to be etched, doped, or layered. In one embodiment, layer


28


can comprise one or more layers of materials, such as, a polysilicon stack comprised of a plurality of alternating layers of titanium silicide, tungsten silicide, cobalt silicide materials, etc. In another embodiment, layer


28


is a hard mask layer, such as, a silicon nitride layer or a metal layer. The hard mask layer can serve as a patterned layer for processing substrate


26


or for processing a layer upon substrate


26


. In yet another embodiment, layer


28


is an anti-reflective coating (ARC). Substrate


26


and layer


28


are not described in a limiting fashion, and can each comprise a conductive, semiconductive, or insulative material.




Photoresist layer


30


can comprise a variety of photoresist chemicals suitable for lithographic applications. Photoresist layer


30


is selected to have photochemical reactions in response to electromagnetic radiation emitted from light source


14


. Materials comprising photoresist layer


30


can include, among others, a matrix material or resin, a sensitizer or inhibitor, and a solvent. Photoresist layer


30


is preferably a chemically amplified, positive or negative tone, organic-based photoresist. Photoresist layer


30


may be, but is not limited to, an acrylate-based polymer, an alicyclic-based polymer, or a phenolic-based polymer. For example, photoresist layer


30


may comprise PAR700 photoresist manufactured by Sumitomo Chemical Company. Photoresist layer


30


is deposited, for example, by spin-coating over layer


28


. Photoresist layer


30


is provided at a thickness of less than 1.0 μm.




Chamber


12


of lithographic system


10


can be a vacuum or low pressure chamber for use in ultraviolet (UV), vacuum ultraviolet (VUV), deep ultraviolet (DUV), extreme ultraviolet (EUV), x-ray, or other types of lithography. Chamber


12


can contain any of numerous types of atmospheres, such as, nitrogen, etc. Alternatively, chamber


12


can be configured to provide a variety of other patterning scheme.




Light source


14


provides light or electromagnetic radiation through condenser lens assembly


16


, mask or reticle


18


, and objective lens assembly


20


to photoresist layer


30


. Light source


14


is an excimer laser, in one embodiment, having a wavelength of 365 nm, 248 nm, 193 nm, 157 nm, or 126 nm, or a soft x-ray source having a wavelength at 13.4 nm. Alternatively, light source


14


may be a variety of other light sources capable of emitting radiation having a wavelength in the ultraviolet (UV), vacuum ultraviolet (VUV), deep ultraviolet (DUV), extreme ultraviolet (EUV), x-ray or other wavelength range.




Assemblies


16


and


20


include lenses, mirrors, collimators, beam splitters, and/or other optical components to suitably focus and direct a pattern of radiation (i.e., radiation from light source


14


as modified by a pattern or image provided on mask or reticle


18


) onto photoresist layer


30


. Stage


22


supports wafer


24


and can move wafer


24


relative to assembly


20


.




Mask or reticle


18


is a binary mask in one embodiment. Mask or reticle


18


includes a translucent substrate


32


(e.g., glass or quartz) and an opaque or absorbing layer


34


(e.g., chromium or chromium oxide) thereof. Absorbing layer


34


provides a pattern or image associated with a desired circuit pattern, features, or devices to be projected onto photoresist layer


30


. Alternatively, mask or reticle


18


may be an attenuating phase shift mask, an alternating phase shift mask, or other type of mask or reticle.




Utilizing lithographic system


10


, the pattern or image on mask or reticle


18


is projected onto and patterned on photoresist layer


30


of wafer


24


. Next, in developing step


42


, wafer


24


is exposed to a developer, as is well-known in the art, to develop the pattern on photoresist layer


30


. Referring to

FIG. 3

, a cross-sectional view of a portion of wafer


24


after developing step


42


is shown. The developed pattern includes features


50


and


51


.




After photoresist layer


30


has been developed but before features thereon are transferred onto any of the underlying layers, such as layer


28


, electron beam exposure step


44


is performed. Wafer


24


may be removed from chamber


12


and placed within a different chamber and/or a different environment which provides electron beam tools. Alternatively, chamber


12


may be configured to include additional chambers and/or tools suitable to perform step


44


.




In

FIG. 4

, there is shown wafer


24


undergoing electron beam exposure step


44


. A flood electron beam


52


impinges on the exposed surfaces of wafer


24


and chemically transforms or modifies such exposed surfaces to a certain depth. For feature


50


, a top surface or region


54


and sidewalls or side regions


56


are transformed into a shell


58


. Similarly, for feature


51


, a top surface or region


60


and sidewalls or side regions


62


are transformed into a shell


64


. Hence, upon completion of step


44


, feature


50


will comprise an untreated region


66


and shell


58


, untreated region


66


being encapsulated from underneath by layer


28


and on all other sides or faces by shell


58


. Similarly, feature


51


will comprise an untreated region


68


and shell


64


, untreated region


68


being encapsulated from underneath by layer


28


and on all other sides or faces by shell


64


.




Electron beam


52


is preferably emitted from an extended area electron source (not shown) and is a uniform collimated beam that is flood exposed over the entire wafer


24


at a normal angle of incidence. The extended area electron source is of the cold cathode type and generates electron beam


52


from the energetic impact of ions against a suitable metal. An example of an extended area electron source suitable to generate electron beam


52


is manufactured by Electron Vision Corporation.




The electron beam flood exposure conditions (e.g., beam current, dose, and accelerating voltage) are selected such that layer


30


will not melt and flow, which will cause distortions in features


50


,


51


. Instead, conditions are selected to cause molecules of layer


30


which interact with electron beam


52


to undergo a chemical change, i.e., cross-linking, to the extent that the functional groups of the polymer material comprising such molecules will become decomposed. Shells


58


and


64


are representative of the decomposed regions of layer


30


. The portions of features


50


,


51


that electron beam


52


are unable to penetrate or bombard, i.e., untreated regions


66


,


68


, remain unaffected (i.e., the polymer functional groups of untreated regions


66


,


68


are not cross-linked to the point of complete decomposition).




The degree of decomposition that the functional groups of the polymer material comprising layer


30


will undergo is a function of the dose of electron beam


52


. In one embodiment, electron beam


52


is provided at a beam current in the order of approximately 3 mA, a dose in the range of approximately 500 to 4000 μC/cm


2


, and preferably, at approximately 2000 μC/cm


2


, and an accelerating voltage of approximately 3-5 keV. The conditions are selected to form shells


58


,


64


configured to suitably address the charging and outgassing problems associated with SEM analysis and inspection. Alternatively, when layer


30


comprises other types of materials, the beam current and dosage of electron beam


52


may be selected to cause desirable chemical changes such that the changed portions of layer


30


will facilitate obtaining accurate CD measurements, as will be described in greater detail below.




The penetration depth of electron beam


52


into layer


30


is a function of the energy of electron beam


52


. The penetration depth also determines the depth or thickness of each of shells


58


,


64


. In one embodiment, the depth of shells


58


,


64


can be selected as a function of the accelerating voltage of electron beam


52


and this relationship can be approximately expressed as:







R
g

=


0.046


V
a
1.75


d











where R


g


is the penetration depth in microns, V


a


is the accelerating voltage or energy in keV, and d is the density of the target material (e.g., layer


30


) in g/cm


3


. Preferably, the accelerating voltage of electron beam


52


is provided at up to approximately 10 keV. More preferably, the accelerating voltage is in the range of approximately 3-5 keV.




In any case, the depth of shells


58


,


64


is selected in accordance with the performance or conditions associated with the SEM analysis and inspection carried out in step


46


. In one embodiment, the depth of shells


58


,


64


is in the range of approximately 30 to 200 Å, and more preferably, is up to 50 to 60 Å thick.




In step


46


, SEM images of the patterned features on layer


30


are generated using an SEM analysis and inspection tool


100


(FIG.


5


), to obtain CD measurements of such patterned features (e.g., to measure the lateral dimensions of features


50


and


51


) before they are transferred onto underlying layers (e.g., layer


28


) of wafer


24


.




Tool


100


includes a chamber


102


, an electron gun


104


, an optical assembly


106


, detectors


108


, a computer or analyzer


110


, and a stage


112


. Although not shown, tool


100


may further include other components, such as, filters, analog-to-digital (A/D) converters, amplifiers, input/output devices, controllers, storage devices, etc.




In one embodiment, chamber


102


is maintained under vacuum at a pressure of approximately 10


−7


Torr. Electrons are emitted from electron gun


104


and configured into primary electrons


114


by optical assembly


106


. Optical assembly


106


may be one or more lens assemblies, and may include lenses, filters, beam splitters, mirrors, etc., which generate a focused and collimated primary electrons


114


. Primary electrons


114


impinge on wafer


24


, and in particular, on layer


30


. Tool


100


preferably images a portion of wafer


24


at any given time and as such, wafer


24


may be provided over stage


112


for translation. Alternatively, wafer


24


may be stationary and tool


100


may move during step


46


.




The interaction of primary electrons


114


with layer


30


causes secondary electrons (not shown) to be emitted from layer


30


. The secondary electrons are collected by detectors


108


and electrical signals representative thereto are communicated to computer


110


for processing and analysis. Although two detectors


108


are shown in

FIG. 5

, detectors


108


may comprise one or more detectors that are suitably positioned relative to wafer


24


to receive the secondary electrons. Detectors


108


can be photomultiplier detectors. Computer


110


utilizes the electrical signals from detectors


108


to generate SEM images of the surface of wafer


24


, i.e., the patterned features on layer


30


. Such SEM images are then inspected, either by a human operator or through an automated process, to obtain CD measurements associated with the patterned features on layer


30


(e.g., the lateral dimensions of features


50


and


51


) (step


48


).




Ideally, primary electrons


114


should penetrate layer


30


up to a certain depth and only secondary electrons should be emitted from layer


30


. Otherwise, primary electrons


114


should have no other interaction with or impact on wafer


24


. In reality, SEM imaging causes, among others, a charge to build up in layer


30


and/or outgassing of volatile species from layer


30


, resulting in SEM images with degraded image contrast and this, in turn, leading to erroneous CD measurements. Moreover, the heating and charging occurring in layer


30


, if severe enough, can cause the patterned features to become permanently distorted. The electron beam treatment of step


44


advantageously minimizes or eliminates such problems.




The cross-linked regions (e.g., shells


58


,


64


) of layer


30


have different structural or material properties relative to the non-cross-linked regions (e.g., untreated regions


66


,


68


) of layer


30


. Among others, the cross-linked regions are more dense, less porous, and are harder or stiffer than the none cross-linked regions. When the depth of shells


58


,


64


is selected to be equal to or greater than the penetration depth of primary electrons


114


, the secondary electrons emitted from features


50


,


51


are predominantly from shells


58


,


64


(as opposed to untreated regions


66


,


68


). Because of the specific properties of shells


58


,


64


, they will not outgas volatile organic species upon interaction with primary electrons


114


. Moreover, since primary electrons


114


will have little or no interaction with untreated regions


66


,


68


, outgassing of volatile organic species from untreated regions


66


,


68


is also minimized or eliminated.




When the depth of shells


58


,


64


is selected to be less than the penetration depth of primary electrons


114


, the secondary electrons are emitted from both shells


58


,


64


and untreated regions


66


,


68


for features


50


,


51


, respectively. Advantageously, volatile organic species which would otherwise be outgassed from untreated regions


66


,


68


into chamber


102


are trapped within layer


30


by shells


58


,


64


. Hence, shells


58


,


64


are configured with respect to the operating conditions of tool


100


and the characteristics of the material comprising layer


30


(e.g., an organic-based photoresist material) such that outgassing of volatile organic species from layer


30


into chamber


102


is prevented by the trapping or barrier capability of shells


58


,


64


. If Volatile organic species were to escape layer


30


, they would interact with and scatter primary electrons


114


, resulting in SEM images with poor contrast and poor CD measurement accuracy. Examples of volatile organic species include isobutene, benzylic photoacid generator fragments, etc.




Shells


58


,


64


also have different optical and electrical properties relative to untreated regions


66


,


68


. The constituent material elements comprising untreated regions


66


,


68


(e.g., residual solvent, photoresist additives, etc.) have different electrical properties relative to each other which can impede smooth dissipation of the beam current associated with SEM imaging, leading to a charge build up in features


50


,


51


. In contrast, the electrical and optical properties of shells


58


,


64


are more uniform than those of untreated regions


66


,


68


. Hence, not only are shells


58


,


64


less likely to build up a charge, their uniform or homogeneous electrical properties also promote smooth dissipation of any built-up charge. This results in SEM images without degraded image contrast and also reduces distortions or damage to features


50


,


51


, which may occur with significant charging and/or heating problems.




It should be understood that SEM tool


100


as shown in FIG.


5


and described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not meant to be limiting. SEM tool


100


may be configured in a variety of other ways to perform a desired inspection of features patterned on layer


30


after development but before pattern transfer to underlying layers.




Once SEM imaging data have been obtained via detectors


108


, such data are analyzed and processed, as is well-known in the art, by computer


110


in step


48


to generate CD measurements that actually represent the lateral dimensions of features on layer


30


.




In this manner, charging, heating, and/or outgassing problems associated with SEM inspection of features patterned on a photoresist layer during IC fabrication can be significantly reduced or even eliminated. An electron beam treatment of the photoresist layer to modify its outer surfaces to a certain depth leads to the formation of a shell or barrier for each feature patterned on the photoresist layer. These shells prevent the outgassing of species which may scatter and interact with the SEM's electron beam and provide a region for smoothly dissipating built-up charge or heat from the SEM's electron beam. The resulting SEM images no longer suffer from image contrast problems and ultimately the CD measurements obtained therefrom will be highly accurate. The patterned features are also less likely to become permanently distorted or damaged as a consequence of undergoing SEM inspection. In one embodiment, charging, heating, and/or outgassing problems typically associated with SEM inspection of organic-based photoresist layer may be reduced by 95% or better.




It is understood that although the detailed drawings, specific examples, and particular values describe the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, they are for purposes of illustration only. The exemplary embodiments of the invention are not limited to the precise details and descriptions described herein. For example, although particular materials or chemistries are describes, other materials or chemistries can be utilized. Various modifications may be made if the details disclosed without departing from the spirit of the invention as defined in the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of inspecting a surface associated with manufacture of an integrated circuit, the method comprising the steps of:providing an electron beam to the surface; transforming at least a portion of the surface; and inspecting the surface using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), wherein the transforming step occurs before the inspecting step, wherein the surface includes at least one patterned feature having a top portion, side portions, and a bottom portion, and the transforming step includes chemically changing the top portion and the side portions to form a shell that encapsulates the bottom portion.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the electron beam is a flood electron beam.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the shell has a depth in the range of approximately 30 to 200 Å.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the surface is an organic-based photoresist layer.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the transforming step includes decomposing polymer functional groups included in the top and the side portions.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the inspecting step includes at least one of preventing volatile species from leaving the surface and substantially dissipating a charge built up in the surface.
  • 7. A patterned photoresist layer configured to facilitate accurate critical dimension measurements of features thereon using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), the layer comprising:a treated region; and an untreated region, wherein the treated region comprises a top surface and side surfaces surrounding the untreated region, and the treated region having at least one of a different electrical and material property relative to the untreated region.
  • 8. The layer of claim 7, wherein the material comprising the patterned photoresist layer is an organic-based polymer.
  • 9. The layer of claim 7, wherein the treated region is formed by flood exposing the patterned photoresist layer to an electron beam.
  • 10. The layer of claim 9, wherein the electron beam has a beam current of approximately 3 mA, a dose in the range of approximately 500-4000 μC/cm2, and an accelerating voltage up to approximately 10 keV.
  • 11. The layer of claim 9, wherein the electron beam has a dose of approximately 2000 μC/cm2 and an accelerating voltage in the range of approximately 3-5 keV.
  • 12. The layer of claim 9, wherein the electron beam cross-links and decomposes polymer functional groups included in the material comprising the treated region.
  • 13. The layer of claim 7, wherein the treated region has a thickness of approximately 30 to 200 Å.
  • 14. The layer of claim 7, wherein the treated region is configured to prevent outgassing species generated by the untreated region from coming into contact with the SEM.
  • 15. The layer of claim 7, wherein the treated region is configured to dissipate a charge generated in the patterned photoresist layer in association with the use of the SEM.
  • 16. A process for reducing the build up of at least one of charge, heat, and volatile species in a photoresist layer during scanning electron microscope (SEM) inspection, the process comprising:exposing the photoresist layer to a flood electron beam, the photoresist layer including at least one patterned feature having a top surface, side surfaces, and an untreated portion; and forming a shell in the photoresist layer in response to the flood electron beam, wherein the shell is comprised of the top surface and the side surfaces, and the shell reduces the build up of at least one of charge, heat, and volatile species associated with the at least one feature during SEM inspection.
  • 17. The process of claim 16, wherein the exposing step includes exposing the flood electron beam having operating conditions of approximately 3 mA, 500-4000 μC/cm2, and up to 10 keV.
  • 18. The process of claim 16, wherein the shell surrounds the untreated portion and a thickness of the shell is approximately 30-200 Å.
  • 19. The process of claim 16, wherein the forming step includes cross-linking the top surface and the side surfaces to form the shell.
  • 20. The process of claim 16, wherein the forming step includes decomposing the functional groups included in the top surface and the side surfaces to form the shell.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 09/819,342 by Shields et al., entitled “Process for Forming Sub-Lithographic Photoresist Features by Modification of the Photoresist Surface;” U.S. application Ser. No. 09/819,692 by Okoroanyanwu et al., entitled “Process for Preventing Deformation of Patterned Photoresist Features by Electron Beam Stabilization;” U.S. application Ser. No. 09/819,344 by Okoroanyanwu et al., entitled “Process for Reducing the Critical Dimensions of Integrated Circuit Device Features;” U.S. application Ser. No. 09/819,343 by Gabriel et al., entitled “Selective Photoresist Hardening to Facilitate Lateral Trimming;” and U.S. application Ser. No. 09/819,552 by Gabriel et al., entitled “Process for Improving the Etch Stability of Ultra-Thin Photoresist,” all filed on an even date herewith and assigned to the Assignee of the present application.

US Referenced Citations (30)
Number Name Date Kind
3997367 Yau Dec 1976 A
4394211 Uchiyama et al. Jul 1983 A
4446222 Kress May 1984 A
5003178 Livesay Mar 1991 A
5242864 Fassberg et al. Sep 1993 A
5468595 Livesay Nov 1995 A
5510215 Prince et al. Apr 1996 A
5747803 Doong May 1998 A
5783366 Chen et al. Jul 1998 A
5876903 Ng et al. Mar 1999 A
5928821 Garrity et al. Jul 1999 A
5962195 Yen et al. Oct 1999 A
5965461 Yang et al. Oct 1999 A
5994225 Liu et al. Nov 1999 A
6103457 Gabriel Aug 2000 A
6107172 Yang et al. Aug 2000 A
6110837 Linliu et al. Aug 2000 A
6121130 Chua et al. Sep 2000 A
6143666 Lin et al. Nov 2000 A
6174818 Tao et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197687 Buynoski Mar 2001 B1
6200903 Oh et al. Mar 2001 B1
6232048 Buynoski et al. May 2001 B1
6319655 Wong et al. Nov 2001 B1
6358670 Wong et al. Mar 2002 B1
6395447 Ishii et al. May 2002 B1
6420097 Pike et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420702 Tripsas et al. Jul 2002 B1
6444381 Singh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6589709 Okoroanyanwu et al. Jul 2003 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Chiong K.G. et al. “Resist Contrast Enhancement in High Resolution Electron Beam Lithography”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology: Part B, American Institute of Physics, New York, US, vol. 7, No. 6.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 1999, No. 09, Jul. 30, 1999 & JP 11 097328 A (Toshiba Corp), Apr. 9, 1999 abstract.
Livesay, W. R., “Large-area electron-beam source,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol. 11, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1993, pp. 2304-2308, American Vacuum Society.
Yang, J. J, et al., “Electron Beam Processing for Spin-on Polymers and its Applications to Back-End-of-Line (BEOL) Integration,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 511, 1998, pp. 49-55, Materials Research Society.
Ross et al, “Plasma Etch Characteristics of Electron Beam Processed Photoresist,” The Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, vol. 2438, 1995, pp. 803-816, SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering.
Grün, Von A. E., “Lumineszenz-photometrische Messungen der Energieabsorption im Strahtungsteid von Elektronenquellen Eindimensionaler Fall in Luft,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 12a, 1957, pp. 89-95, Publisher: Zeitschrift für Naturforschung: full English Translation attached (11 pgs.).
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/819,342, Shields et al., filed Mar. 28, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/819,343, Gabriel et al., filed Mar. 28, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/819,344, Okoroanyanwu et al., filed Mar. 28, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/819,552, Gabriel et al., filed Mar. 28, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/819,692, Okoroanyanwu et al., filed Mar. 28, 2001.