As the storage capacity of magnetic data storage devices increases, the magnetic bit size in the storage media becomes smaller. A smaller bit size requires a reduction in physical dimensions of the recording head.
Magnetic recording heads typically include a reader portion having a sensor for retrieving magnetically encoded information stored on a magnetic disc. Magnetic flux from the surface of the disc causes rotation of the magnetization vector of a sensing layer or layers of the sensor, which in turn causes a change in the electrical properties of the sensor. The sensing layers are often called free layers, since the magnetization vectors of the sensing layers are free to rotate in response to external magnetic flux. The change in the electrical properties of the sensor may be detected by passing a current through the sensor and measuring a voltage across the sensor. Depending on the geometry of the device, the sense current may be passed in the plane (CIP) of the layers of the device or perpendicular to the plane (CPP) of the layers of the device. External circuitry then converts the voltage information into an appropriate format and manipulates that information as necessary to recover information encoded on the disc.
The magnetoresistive (MR) sensor (reader) may be located between high permeability shields to screen the sensor from external magnetic fields, such as stray fields from media. With increasing recording density, the shield-to-shield spacing of the reader becomes narrower to meet higher linear density requirements and to screen external flux.
A narrow shield-to-shield spacing of the reader requires that layers in the reader stack become thinner, which makes the sensor more sensitive to materials around it. A thinner reader stack cap could make the free layer more susceptible to magnetic domain changes in the shields and introduce unwanted instability. Furthermore, the shield topography may also introduce additional domain movement in the shield, which could influence the free layer response and add noise to the read signal.
In order to ensure the stability of the reader when it is subjected to external fields and to minimize noise from any magnetic domain movement inside the shields, it would be desirable to provide improved control of the magnetic properties of the shields.
In a first aspect, the disclosure provides apparatus including a sensor stack, first and second shields positioned on opposite sides of the sensor stack, and a first shield stabilization structure adjacent to the first shield and applying a bias magnetic field to the first shield.
These and other features and advantages which characterize the various embodiments of the present disclosure can be understood in view of the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
In one aspect, this disclosure provides an apparatus including a read sensor between magnetic shields, wherein the shields are stabilized with an applied magnetic bias. This configuration can reduce magnetic disturbances on read sensor stack.
A writer portion of magnetic read/write head includes first pole 36, write gap layer 38, second pole 40, conductive coil 42, and insulator layer 44. Write gap 46 is defined on air bearing surface ABS by write gap layer 38 between terminating ends of the poles. Electrically conductive coil 42 is provided to generate magnetic fields across the write gap 46 and is positioned in insulator layer 44 between first pole and the write gap layer. While
A reader portion of read/write head 30 includes a first shield 48, a second shield 50, and read element 52 positioned between terminating ends of the shields 48 and 50. The reader can be separated from the writer by an insulating layer 54. Alternatively, shield 36 could serve as the top shield of the reader assembly.
The reader shields may be constructed of high permeability materials that function to protect the sensor element from stray magnetic fields originating from adjacent magnetic bits on the medium. With decreasing sensor size, the shield-to-shield spacing of the MR sensor should be made smaller to adequately screen the flux from adjacent bits.
Contemporary read heads typically include a thin film multilayer structure containing ferromagnetic material that exhibits some type of magnetoresistance (MR). A typical MR sensor configuration includes a multilayered structure formed of a nonmagnetic layer positioned between a synthetic antiferromagnet (SAF) and a ferromagnetic free layer, or between two ferromagnetic free layers. The resistance of the MR sensor depends on the relative orientations of the magnetization of the magnetic layers. The read sensing element can be a layered stack having, for example, a CIP or CPP configuration.
For known recording heads, the reader shields have a thickness that ranges from about 0.2 μm to about 2 μm. Non-magnetic reader stack seed and cap layers separate the shields from reader stack to minimize the magnetic coupling effect. Normally, the magnetic direction of the shields is set to be parallel to the air bearing surface (ABS) of the recording head without any external magnetic field. When an external magnetic field (such as a stray field) is introduced, the magnetic direction of the shields responds to the external field and rotates to protect the reader sensor from disturbance. If the shields near the reader stack area cannot return to the original magnetic state when the external field is removed, uncertainty will be added to the reader response and noise will be added to the reader signal. Furthermore, different annealing temperatures and directions in the recording head build process may also add uncertainty to the magnetic properties of the shields when responding to an external field. Therefore, it is desirable that the shields, or at least a portion of the shields near reader sensor, return to the same magnetic state after any external magnetic disturbance.
In one aspect of the disclosure, to stabilize the shield and reduce unwanted instability, an anti-ferromagnetic (AFM) bias structure is employed to minimize uncertainty of the direction of magnetization in the shield.
The thickness of the first layer 104 can range from about 10 nm to about 100 nm and thickness of the AFM layer 106 can range from about 5 nm to about 15 nm depending on desired bias strength. For some materials in layer 104 (such as NiFeX, for example, but not limited to, NiFe, NiFeNb, NiFeTa, NiFeRh or NiFeW), a thin magnetic layer 108 (such as CoFe) can be added to improve the AFM bias. A non-magnetic layer 110, having a thickness of, for example, several nanometers, can be included on top of AFM layer to eliminate exchange coupling between shield 96 and AFM layer. Another non-magnetic layer 112 is included between layer 104 and PM/reader to reduce exchange coupling between permanent magnets and layer 104. The combination of shield 96, AFM stack 102 and non-magnetic layer 110 forms a composite shield 114.
Using a low temperature anneal (e.g., lower than the reader stack anneal) after shield stabilization layers are formed, the magnetization of the AFM layer can be set to a desired direction as long as the annealing temperature is higher than the AFM blocking temperature. Thus in one aspect, this disclosure provides method including: providing a sensor structure including a sensor stack, first and second shields positioned on opposite sides of the sensor stack, and a first shield stabilization structure adjacent to the first shield and applying a bias magnetic field to the first shield; and annealing the structure at a first temperature lower than an anneal temperature of the sensor stack, to set a direction of magnetization of the first shield stabilization structure. When the first shield stabilization structure includes a first antiferromagnetic layer adjacent to a first magnetic layer, and the first temperature is higher than an antiferromagnetic blocking temperature of the first antiferromagnetic layer.
In the assembly of
The magnetic flux from the AFM bias configuration of
An AFM shield stabilization structure 132 is positioned between the sensor stack and the top shield. Similar to AFM bias structure of
The annealing direction of magnetization of structure 132 can be adjusted to get a desired magnetic direction in the SAF structure. As indicated in
In the embodiments described above, the shield stabilization structure is located between the reader sensor/PM stack and the top shield. Smooth interfacial structures, which are desirable to obtain a high coupling field, can be obtained if the reader sensor and the PM have smooth top surfaces.
In another embodiment, AFM bias with or without a SAF configuration can be included in both shields. Shield stabilization with an AFM bias and with or without SAF configurations can also be applied between the reader sensor and bottom shield to improve the stabilization of the pinned layer and the reference layer.
Another AFM stack 186 is positioned between reader sensor 162 and bottom shield 164. The AFM stack includes a first layer 188 of a magnetic material, which can be a material with high permeability, for example, NiFe, high magnetic moment, for example, CoFeX, or a multilayer structure, for example, CoFeX/NiFe, and an AFM layer 190 that provides a bias to the adjacent magnetic layer 188. The thickness of the first layer 188 can range from about 10 nm to about 100 nm and thickness of the AFM layer can range from about 5 nm to about 15 nm depending on desired bias strength. For some materials in layer 188 (such as NiFeX), a thin magnetic layer 192 (such as CoFe) can be added to improve the AFM bias. A non-magnetic layer 194, having a thickness of for example several nanometers, is included below AFM layer to eliminate exchange coupling between shield 164 and AFM layer. The combination of shield 164, AFM stack 186 and non-magnetic layer 194 forms a composite shield 196.
An AFM shield stabilization structure 212 is positioned between the sensor stack and the top shield. Similar to AFM bias structure of
Another AFM shield stabilization structure 234 is positioned between the sensor stack and the bottom shield. Non-magnetic layer 236 is included to magnetically separate the shield 204 and the shield stabilization structure 234. Layers 238 and 240 are magnetic materials (such as, for example, NiFeX or CoFeX alloy) and are separated by non-magnetic spacer layer 242 (such as, for example, Ru) to introduce SAF coupling. Thin magnetic layers 244 and 246 (such as CoFe) can be inserted at both sides of spacer layer 242 to increase SAF coupling for some materials (such as NiFe) in layers 238 and 240. An AFM layer 248 is positioned adjacent to layer 240. A thin magnetic layer 250 (such as CoFe) may be needed to get sufficient AFM bias if layer 240 is a NiFe based alloy. The thickness of both layers 238 and 240 can be optimized to get balanced antiparallel magnetic moments between layers 238 and 240, as illustrated by the arrows in layers 238 and 240. A balanced SAF structure results in closed flux between layers 238 and 240 and does not give any undesirable torque to the other layers of the reader sensor. The combination of shield 204, AFM shield stabilization structure 234 and non-magnetic layer 236 forms a composite shield 252.
The annealing direction of magnetization of structure 212 can be adjusted to get a desired magnetic direction in the SAF structure. As indicated in
In the embodiments of both
The magnetic moment in the SAF structure inside the reader sensor is not allowed to rotate under magnetic fields coming from the magnetic media. Therefore, a disturbance from an unstable top shield may have a bigger effect on the reader sensor instability than a disturbance from the bottom shield, as the top shield is much closer to the free layer in reader stack.
There might be a concern that adding thick non-magnetic layers, such as the AFM layer, between the reader sensor and the shields may affect the reader shield-to-shield spacing. By selecting an optimized thickness of the magnetic layer adjacent to the reader sensor in the AFM with or without SAF configurations, the shield-to-shield spacing of the reader sensor will not be affected by the non-magnetic layers.
The shield area adjacent to reader sensor has the most sensitive effect on screening an external field from reader signal. Therefore, stabilizing the shield area right above or below reader sensor area has a direct impact on minimizing the shield influence and reducing noise from shields. Furthermore, depositing layers with good AFM biasing and SAF coupling for the whole shield area uniformly is challenging due to the topography of shield, defect formation and limitations in the deposition process.
In one embodiment, the size of shield stabilization configuration can be reduced to cover areas close to reader sensor.
Different shapes and aspect ratios can also be applied to the shield stabilization configurations to improve shield stability.
In another aspect, the disclosure provides an apparatus including a data storage medium, a recording head including a sensor stack, first and second shields positioned on opposite sides of the sensor stack, and a first shield stabilization structure adjacent to the first shield and applying a bias magnetic field to the first shield, and an arm for positioning the recording head adjacent to the data storage medium. The first shield stabilization structure can include a first antiferromagnetic layer adjacent to a first magnetic layer. The apparatus can further include a second magnetic layer separated from the first magnetic layer by a first non-magnetic layer to form a first synthetic antiferromagnetic structure. The magnetic moment between the first and second magnetic layers can be balanced. The apparatus can further include a second shield stabilization structure adjacent to the second shield and applying a bias magnetic field to the second shield. The second shield stabilization structure can include a first antiferromagnetic layer adjacent to a first magnetic layer and a second magnetic layer separated from the first magnetic layer by a first non-magnetic layer to form a first synthetic antiferromagnetic structure. The first shield stabilization structure can be positioned adjacent to a portion of the first shield. The width and depth of the first stabilization structure can be greater than or equal to a width and depth of the sensor stack. The width of the first stabilization structure can be greater than the depth of the first stabilization structure.
It is to be understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of various embodiments of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of various embodiments of the invention, this detailed description is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of structure and arrangements of parts within the principles of the present invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed. For example, the particular elements may vary depending on the particular application without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/167,142 filed on Jun. 23, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6597545 | Macken et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6710982 | Mack et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6930865 | Ghaly et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7615996 | Machita et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7782574 | Benakli et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
20030189802 | Morinaga et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040100737 | Nakamoto et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050088789 | Hou et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050157431 | Hatatani et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070195467 | Gill | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090135529 | Shimazawa et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090174968 | Singleton et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190272 | Machita et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090279213 | Wu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100027168 | Chou et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039734 | Hara et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100067148 | Tsuchiya et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079917 | Miyauchi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103562 | Machita et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100188775 | Macken et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100214698 | Macken et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110051291 | Miyauchi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069417 | Kawamori et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091744 | Kawamori et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110279923 | Miyauchi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120087045 | Yanagisawa et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120087046 | Yanagisawa et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120147504 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120250189 | Degawa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004-334921 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006-309842 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2010-086648 | Apr 2010 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140104729 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13167142 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 14109184 | US |