Silicon carbide schottky diode

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9627553
  • Patent Number
    9,627,553
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 5, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 18, 2017
    7 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 257 676000
    • 257 155000
    • 257 260000
    • 257 267000
    • 257 280-284
    • 257 449-457
    • 257 471-474
    • 257 077000
    • 257 478000
    • 257 253000
    • CPC
    • H01L29/872
    • H01L29/20
    • H01L29/47
    • H01L29/66
    • H01L29/1608
    • H01L21/02529
    • H01L21/02378
    • H01L29/1602
    • H01L29/0619
    • H01L21/8213
    • H01L21/02376
    • H01L21/02527
    • H01L21/02444
    • H01L2924/10272
  • International Classifications
    • H01L29/47
    • H01L29/872
    • H01L29/16
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
Abstract
A SiC Schottky diode which includes a Schottky barrier formed on a silicon face 4H—SiC body.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to Schottky diodes and in particular to SiC Schottky diodes.


BACKGROUND ART

Although the main intrinsic parameters in Silicon Carbide material have not been exhaustively studied, several experimental and theoretical studies have been performed in recent years in order to better describe the current transport in ohmic and rectifying contact on SiC.


It has been known that in Schottky diodes the metal semiconductor interface (MST) between the Schottky barrier metal and the semiconductor plays a crucial role in the electrical performance of electronic devices. Many factors can worsen the performance of the MSI in a Schottky diode. For example, the quality of the semiconductor surface prior to the deposition of the Schottky barrier metal can cause the device to exhibit characteristics that are different from the ideal characteristics.


Current-voltage (I-V) and capacitance-voltage (C-V) characterizations are useful methods for determining the Schottky barrier height from which the MSI uniformity can be obtained. It has been known that the barrier height determined from C-V measurements often exceeds the value extracted from forward I-V measurements. The discrepancy is also seen to be greater for Schottky contacts with high ideality factor, i.e. poor Schottky MSI quality. Sullivan et al., J. Appl. Physics, 70, No. 12, (1991), 7403-7424, have explained that such a discrepancy is due to barrier height inhomogeneities, and have demonstrated that if the barrier height is assumed to follow some statistical distribution, the barrier height value extracted from C-V measurements is the arithmetic mean of the barrier height distribution (the capacitance of the Schottky contact comes from the modulation of the total space-charge as a function of bias). On the other hand, the value from I-V characterization is well below the value extracted from capacitance analysis, and is dominated by the current that flows through regions of lower barrier height. Also, the inhomogeneity of the barrier height is believed to be a primary reason for the observation of large ideality factors (n>1.1). For intimate contact and uniform MSI, the barrier height values extracted from C-V and I-V characterization are expected to be in close correlation, and ideality factors very close to unity.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A semiconductor device according to the present invention is a SiC Schottky diode which includes a SiC substrate of one conductivity, a silicon face SiC epitaxial body of the one conductivity formed on a first surface of a the SiC substrate, a Schottky metal barrier formed on the silicon face of the SiC epitaxial body, a back power electrode on a second surface of the SiC substrate opposite said first surface of the SiC substrate.


In one embodiment of the present invention the Schottky metal barrier is formed of Titanium, and the silicon face epitaxial SiC is 4H—SiC. It has been found that this combination results in a very uniform MSI, which allows for accurate electrical characterization of the device.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention which refers to the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a portion of a SiC semiconductor device according to the present invention.



FIG. 2 graphically illustrates the I-V characteristics of a device according to the present invention as a function of temperature.



FIG. 3 illustrates a Richardson's plot of In(Js/T**2) versus 1/kT, experimental data and linear fit.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

A power semiconductor device according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention is a discrete Schottky diode that includes SiC substrate 10 (preferably 4H—SiC bulk SiC) of N-type conductivity, silicon face 4H—SiC epitaxial body 12 of N-type conductivity formed on one surface of substrate 10, Schottky metal body (Schottky barrier) 14 formed over and in Schottky contact with epitaxial body 12, and a back power electrode 16 formed on another opposite surface of substrate 10. A region of P-type conductivity 18 serving as a guard ring is diffused into epitaxial body 12, is in contact with Schottky body 14, and defines the other boundary of the active region (i.e. region defined by the Schottky contact between Schottky body 14 and epitaxial body 12) of the device. A device according to the preferred embodiment further includes a field insulation body 20 disposed on epitaxial body 12 and surrounding the active region of the device. Note that field insulation body 20 includes sidewalls 22 that taper toward the active region of the device, and that Schottky body 14 extends over sidewalls 22 and a portion of the top surface of field insulation body 20. A device according to the preferred embodiment further includes a metallic front power electrode 24 which is disposed over at least Schottky body 14.


In the preferred embodiment, Schottky body 14 is composed of titanium (which has been observed to make a uniform MSI with silicon face 4H—SiC), front power electrode 24 is composed of aluminum, back power electrode 16 is composed of a trimetal stack of titanium (in ohmic contact with substrate 10), nickel (formed on the titanium layer), and silver (formed on the nickel layer). Field insulation body 20 is preferably composed of silicon dioxide.


The behavior of the electrical parameters of a Schottky barrier diode (SBD) fabricated on the Si face of a 4H—SiC epitaxial layer according to the present invention was studied. The study revealed that the devices according to the present invention exhibit an electrical behavior in accordance to thermoionic emission and a good MSI uniformity confirmed by C-V measurements. I-V measurements (I-V) were also performed in a large temperature range which led to an evaluation of the Richardson constant.


Details of the Study


Schottky barrier diodes were fabricated on 3″ 4H—SiC wafers, production grade, produced by Cree Inc. Epitaxial body 12 and substrate 10 of wafers were n-doped (Nd=1016 cm−3, thickness 7 μm and Nd=1018 cm−3, thickness 380 μm, respectively). The junction extermination extension on fabricated devices was formed by a guard ring 18 obtained by P+ type implantation and a mesa structure with an additional ring of silicon oxide 20. Schottky barrier 14 was made by thermal evaporation of Titanium and a successive Aluminum layer 24. Ohmic contact 16 formation was made on the back-side of the wafer by a triple evaporation of Titanium, Nickel and Silver.


Fabricated devices were then packaged in a standard TO-220 commercial package.


All step processes were optimized in previous work, leading to obtain a percentage of working diodes with a reverse current<50 μA@600 V of reverse voltage up to 85%.


Electrical measurements were performed by an SMU237 Keithley Source Measure Unit and an SMU238 Keithley Source Measure Unit. Doping concentration was controlled by C-V measurements at the standard frequency of 1 MHz (HP 4192A LF).


Electrical characterization versus temperature was performed by using an Oxford cryostat. The measurements were performed on selected devices which passed reliability tests working 1000 hours in stress conditions.


Results


In order to avoid any problems related to fabrication process and surface preparation, devices were selected with behavior close to ideal.


A first electrical characterization was done by standard I-V and C-V measurements fitting data according to thermoionic emission theory (TET) in order to obtain ideality factor, barrier height, doping concentration and reverse current at 600 V. The mean values were 1.02, 1.21 eV, 81015 cm−3 and 30 μA. Break down voltage was higher than 1100 V, close to the ideal value. Twenty selected devices were tested further by voltage measurement versus time up to 1000 hour. The results demonstrated an optimal stability with unchanged characteristic.


Electrical measurements were performed in the range 77-300 K with a temperature step of 20 K by means of forward and reverse current voltage analysis. FIG. 2 reports the semi logarithmic plot of the I-V curves of SBD, showing a linear behavior over seven orders of magnitude.


Table 1 reports barrier height and ideality factor versus temperature extracted from experimental data, according to TET and by using the classical value of 146 A K−2 cm−2. It is worth noting that the ideality factor is close to 1.1 up to 77 K, and in the range 200-300 K is almost constant. This leads to the conclusion that the barrier/metal interface is very homogeneous which is confirmed also by the Schottky height barrier value obtained by C-V measurements (1.2 eV).









TABLE 1







EXPERIMENTAL VALUES OF SCHOTTKY BARRIER


HEIGHT AND IDEALITY FACTOR.









TEMP
BARRIER HEIGHT



(K)
(eV)
IDEALITY FACTOR












77
1.11 ± 0.2
1.13 ± 0.2


100
1.14 ± 0.2
 1.1 ± 0.2


120
1.15 ± 0.2
1.09 ± 0.2


140
1.17 ± 0.1
1.07 ± 0.1


160
1.17 ± 0.1
1.07 ± 0.1


180
1.19 ± 0.1
1.05 ± 0.1


200
1.20 ± 0.1
1.04 ± 0.1


220
1.20 ± 0.1
1.04 ± 0.1


240
1.21 ± 0.1
1.03 ± 0.1


260
1.21 ± 0.1
1.03 ± 0.1


280
1.21 ± 0.1
1.03 ± 0.1


300
1.21 ± 0.1
1.03 ± 0.1









In order to obtain additional information, for the determination of the effective barrier height and of the AA product, saturation current density was extracted from experimental data in the range 200-300 K and reported in a Richardson's plot (FIG. 3).


From the slope of the linear fit and from the intercept, one can obtain an effective value of barrier height of 1.16±0.1 eV and an effective Richardson's constant A=17±8 A K−2 cm−2. The Richardson's constant is different from the classical theoretical value. Many have tried to explain and model the Schottky contacts on SiC, in order to fit experimental data to the theoretical value. In theory, the value of the effective Richardson constant A* should be calculated for a semiconductor with indirect energy gap and a number MC of equivalent ellipsoidal constant energy surface in the first Brillouin zone, by considering diagonal components of the effective mass tensor. Such a theoretical calculation leads to Richardson constant values that are dependent on the particular crystallographic direction considered in Thermionic emission. The commonly reported value for the 4H—SiC Richardson constant was firstly calculated by loth et al., ISPSD '95 (1995) 101-106. It can be shown that such a value was obtained by simply averaging the effective mass value in Gotz et al., J. Appl. Phys., 73, No. 7, (1993) 3332-2228. neglecting any crystallographic anisotropy, and considering a number of equivalent conduction band minima equal to 6 (derived from the conduction band minimum location along the M-K edge of the first Brillouin zone reported in Tairov et al., “Electroluminescence”, J. I. Parkov, Ed., Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Springer-Verlag (1977). The location of the equivalent conduction band minima has been more recently demonstrated to be exactly at the M-point of the first Brillouin zone, and symmetry considerations lead to a number of equivalent minima MC equal to 3 (the constant energy surfaces are 6 semi-ellipsoids). Such a value for MC should be employed in the calculation of the effective Richardson constant of 4H—SiC.


Moreover, a modified Richardson constant A** should be derived from A* taking into account quantum mechanical tunneling and reflections at the Schottky interface and interactions of the emitted electrons with optical phonons, as suggested in Crowell et al., Solid-State Electron., 9 (1966) 1035-1048.


Such a complete model has never been applied to hexagonal materials, and to 4H—SiC in particular. Thus, the commonly accepted value of 146 A/cm2V2 was employed because it was estimated that an error of 30% in A* would affect the value of Schottky barrier height φB extracted from thermionic emission saturation current measurements of about 1%.


Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor device, comprising: a SiC substrate;a silicon face SiC epitaxial body formed on a first surface of a said SiC substrate;a Schottky metal barrier formed on said silicon face of said SiC epitaxial body; anda back power electrode on a second surface of said SiC substrate wherein said Schottky metal barrier is configured to exhibit a voltage characterization of the barrier that reflects uniformity between said Schottky metal barrier and said silicon.
  • 2. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein said Schottky metal barrier is comprised of Titanium.
  • 3. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein said back electrode is comprised of a stack of Titanium, Nickel, and Silver.
  • 4. The semiconductor device of claim 1, a region of another conductivity diffused into said SiC epitaxial body defining an outer boundary of an active region of said device.
  • 5. The semiconductor device of claim 1, further comprising a field insulation body formed on said SiC epitaxial body, wherein said Schottky metal barrier extends over said field insulation body.
  • 6. The semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein said field insulation body is comprised of silicon dioxide.
  • 7. The semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein said field insulation body includes tapered sidewalls tapering toward said SiC epitaxial body.
  • 8. The semiconductor device of claim 1, further comprising a front power electrode formed on said Schottky metal body.
  • 9. The semiconductor device of claim 8, wherein said front power electrode is comprised of aluminum.
  • 10. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein said SiC epitaxial body is comprised of 4H—SiC.
  • 11. The semiconductor device of claim 10, wherein said SiC is comprised of 4H—SiC.
  • 12. A Schottky diode comprising: a silicon face SiC epitaxial body; anda Schottky metal barrier formed on said silicon face of said SiC epitaxial body,wherein said Schottky metal barrier is configured to exhibit a voltage characterization of the barrier that reflects uniformity between said Schottky metal barrier and said silicon.
  • 13. The Schottky diode of claim 12 further comprising: a back electrode comprising Titanium, Nickel, and Silver.
  • 14. The Schottky diode of claim 12 further comprising: a region of another conductivity diffused into said SiC epitaxial body defining an outer boundary of an active region of said Schottky diode.
  • 15. The Schottky diode of claim 14 wherein said region of another conductivity forms a guard ring around said active region.
  • 16. The Schottky diode of claim 12 wherein said SiC comprises 4H SiC.
  • 17. The Schottky diode of claim 12 further comprising a ring of silicon oxide disposed between a portion of said Schottky metal and said SiC epitaxial body.
  • 18. The Schottky diode of claim 12 characterized as having an ideality factor of less than 1.1 for temperatures above 140 K.
  • 19. The Schottky diode of claim 12 characterized as having an ideality factor of less than or equal to 1.05 for temperatures above 200 K.
  • 20. The Schottky diode of claim 12 characterized as having a breakdown voltage of greater than 1100 volts.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of co-pending, commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/581,536, filed on Oct. 16, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,368,165 by Giovanni Richieri, and titled “Silicon carbide schottky diode,” which claims the benefit of and priority to the provisional patent application, Ser. No. 60/728,728, filed on Oct. 20, 2005, by Giovanni Richieri, and titled “Silicon carbide schottky diode,” each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (166)
Number Name Date Kind
4036672 Kobayashi Jul 1977 A
4206540 Gould Jun 1980 A
4648175 Metz, Jr. et al. Mar 1987 A
4672738 Stengl et al. Jun 1987 A
4796084 Kamasaki et al. Jan 1989 A
4862244 Yamagishi Aug 1989 A
4903189 Ngo et al. Feb 1990 A
4990994 Furukawa et al. Feb 1991 A
5003372 Kim et al. Mar 1991 A
5047833 Gould Sep 1991 A
5113237 Stengl May 1992 A
5233215 Baliga Aug 1993 A
5323040 Baliga Jun 1994 A
5362975 von Windheim et al. Nov 1994 A
5384470 Tachibana et al. Jan 1995 A
5436174 Baliga et al. Jul 1995 A
5527745 Dixit et al. Jun 1996 A
5689128 Hshieh et al. Nov 1997 A
5712502 Mitlehner et al. Jan 1998 A
5747831 Loose et al. May 1998 A
5753938 Thapar et al. May 1998 A
5789311 Ueno et al. Aug 1998 A
5801836 Bakowski et al. Sep 1998 A
5914500 Bakowski et al. Jun 1999 A
5915179 Etou et al. Jun 1999 A
5932894 Bakowski et al. Aug 1999 A
5977605 Bakowski et al. Nov 1999 A
6040237 Bakowski et al. Mar 2000 A
6040600 Uenishi et al. Mar 2000 A
6040617 Patel Mar 2000 A
6100572 Kinzer Aug 2000 A
6150246 Parsons Nov 2000 A
6177712 Miyasaka Jan 2001 B1
6207591 Aoki et al. Mar 2001 B1
6229194 Lizotte May 2001 B1
6303986 Shook Oct 2001 B1
6320205 Pfirsch et al. Nov 2001 B1
6330967 Milewski et al. Dec 2001 B1
6353252 Yasuhara et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362495 Schoen et al. Mar 2002 B1
6373076 Alok Apr 2002 B1
6410958 Usui et al. Jun 2002 B1
6432750 Jeon et al. Aug 2002 B2
6441455 Dutta Aug 2002 B1
6498368 Sakamoto et al. Dec 2002 B2
6509240 Ren et al. Jan 2003 B2
6514782 Wierer, Jr. et al. Feb 2003 B1
6562647 Zandman et al. May 2003 B2
6573534 Kumar et al. Jun 2003 B1
6573537 Steigerwald et al. Jun 2003 B1
6586801 Onishi et al. Jul 2003 B2
6605862 Van Dalen et al. Aug 2003 B2
6621122 Qu Sep 2003 B2
6622380 Grigg Sep 2003 B1
6624522 Standing et al. Sep 2003 B2
6630698 Deboy et al. Oct 2003 B1
6635944 Stoisiek Oct 2003 B2
6673662 Singh Jan 2004 B2
6674126 Iwamoto et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683347 Fujihira Jan 2004 B1
6700141 Iwamoto et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713813 Marchant Mar 2004 B2
6740931 Kouzuki et al. May 2004 B2
6762455 Oppermann et al. Jul 2004 B2
6764906 Darwish Jul 2004 B2
6768170 Zhou Jul 2004 B2
6791167 Hayashi et al. Sep 2004 B2
6812282 Chang et al. Nov 2004 B2
6828609 Deboy et al. Dec 2004 B2
6844571 Krames et al. Jan 2005 B2
6849900 Aida et al. Feb 2005 B2
6897133 Collard May 2005 B2
6936850 Friedrichs et al. Aug 2005 B2
6949454 Swanson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6960829 Hogerl Nov 2005 B2
6979862 Henson Dec 2005 B2
6992340 Tanaka Jan 2006 B2
7034376 Okada et al. Apr 2006 B2
7073890 Cabal et al. Jul 2006 B2
7166890 Sridevan Jan 2007 B2
7173284 Kumar et al. Feb 2007 B2
7262434 Okamura Aug 2007 B2
7265045 Lee et al. Sep 2007 B2
7265388 Fukuda et al. Sep 2007 B2
7299538 Tactic-Lucic Nov 2007 B2
7315081 Standing Jan 2008 B2
7394158 Carta et al. Jul 2008 B2
7411218 Seng et al. Aug 2008 B2
7492003 Kinzer Feb 2009 B2
7507650 Nakamura et al. Mar 2009 B2
7649213 Hatakeyama et al. Jan 2010 B2
7687907 Okuda et al. Mar 2010 B2
7718470 Hsu May 2010 B2
7777292 Ota et al. Aug 2010 B2
7812441 Carta et al. Oct 2010 B2
7834376 Carta et al. Nov 2010 B2
8368165 Richieri Feb 2013 B2
8368211 Standing et al. Feb 2013 B2
8368223 Standing Feb 2013 B2
20010043172 McGrath et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010052601 Onishi et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020063281 Tihanyl May 2002 A1
20020064930 Ishikawa May 2002 A1
20020076851 Eden et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020109211 Shinohara Aug 2002 A1
20020171087 Krames et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020179909 Uchida et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030006425 Bol et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030042538 Kumar et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030075783 Yoshihara et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030119300 Chiu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030127747 Kajiwara et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030162355 Sankin et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030168734 Fang Sep 2003 A1
20030176031 Onishi et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030183895 Okamura et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040012930 Grigg Jan 2004 A1
20040051118 Bruhns et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040063240 Madrid et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040070060 Mamitsu et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040104489 Larking Jun 2004 A1
20040110330 Collard Jun 2004 A1
20040113264 Akerling et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040135178 Onose et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145380 Babcock et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040150040 Nitta et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169262 Oliver et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040207092 Burrell et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040212011 Ryu Oct 2004 A1
20040212093 Chopra et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040245570 Ninomiya Dec 2004 A1
20040262685 Zingg Dec 2004 A1
20050012143 Tanaka et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050023680 Wang et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050029557 Hatakeyama et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050034888 Hoffmann et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050067630 Zhao Mar 2005 A1
20050072984 Kwak et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050077615 Yu et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050082570 Sridevan Apr 2005 A1
20050082611 Peake et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091988 Stewart et al. May 2005 A1
20050116344 Humpston Jun 2005 A1
20050136635 Savastiouk et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050139947 Okada et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050200011 Standing et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050230715 Hoshino et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050253168 Wu et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060003514 Richieri Jan 2006 A1
20060065899 Hatakeyama et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060086939 Carta et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060145283 Zhu et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060145319 Sun et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060214242 Carta et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060220027 Takahashi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060226504 Hatakeyama et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060255423 Ryu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070222025 Husain et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070228505 Mazzola et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080237608 Richieri Oct 2008 A1
20080286968 Carta et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090067630 Daemen et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090104738 Ring et al. Apr 2009 A1
20100068855 Saxler et al. Mar 2010 A1
20110248284 Carta et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110278591 Carta et al. Nov 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
19840032 Nov 1999 DE
10002362 Aug 2001 DE
0604194 Jun 1994 EP
0681326 Nov 1995 EP
0958923 Nov 1999 EP
1349202 Jan 2003 EP
1739753 Mar 2007 EP
2579023 Sep 1986 FR
1187698 Jul 1989 JP
7302896 Nov 1995 JP
09-036393 Feb 1997 JP
11-087690 Mar 1999 JP
11348355 Dec 1999 JP
2000-022178 Jan 2000 JP
2001313391 Nov 2001 JP
2002-118268 Apr 2002 JP
2002158363 May 2002 JP
2002261295 Sep 2002 JP
2003074951 Mar 2003 JP
2003258271 Sep 2003 JP
2003273127 Sep 2003 JP
2004079988 Mar 2004 JP
2004-111759 Apr 2004 JP
2004099898 Apr 2004 JP
2004-221513 Aug 2004 JP
2005079339 Mar 2005 JP
2005-286197 Oct 2005 JP
2005-311347 Nov 2005 JP
2006-100593 Apr 2006 JP
9727626 Jul 1997 WO
0038242 Jun 2000 WO
0143172 Jun 2001 WO
03038906 May 2003 WO
2005091988 Oct 2005 WO
2005093840 Oct 2005 WO
2006047382 May 2006 WO
2006074382 Jul 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
International Search Report for PCT/US05/38118 dated Feb. 6, 2007. (reference povided in the parent U.S. Pat. No. 8,368,165 per 37 C.F.R. 1.98(d).).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140042459 A1 Feb 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60728728 Oct 2005 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11581536 Oct 2006 US
Child 13759872 US