The present invention relates to Schottky diodes and in particular to SiC Schottky diodes.
Although the main intrinsic parameters in Silicon Carbide material have not been exhaustively studied, several experimental and theoretical studies have been performed in recent years in order to better describe the current transport in ohmic and rectifying contact on SiC.
It has been known that in Schottky diodes the metal semiconductor interface (MST) between the Schottky barrier metal and the semiconductor plays a crucial role in the electrical performance of electronic devices. Many factors can worsen the performance of the MSI in a Schottky diode. For example, the quality of the semiconductor surface prior to the deposition of the Schottky barrier metal can cause the device to exhibit characteristics that are different from the ideal characteristics.
Current-voltage (I-V) and capacitance-voltage (C-V) characterizations are useful methods for determining the Schottky barrier height from which the MSI uniformity can be obtained. It has been known that the barrier height determined from C-V measurements often exceeds the value extracted from forward I-V measurements. The discrepancy is also seen to be greater for Schottky contacts with high ideality factor, i.e. poor Schottky MSI quality. Sullivan et al., J. Appl. Physics, 70, No. 12, (1991), 7403-7424, have explained that such a discrepancy is due to barrier height inhomogeneities, and have demonstrated that if the barrier height is assumed to follow some statistical distribution, the barrier height value extracted from C-V measurements is the arithmetic mean of the barrier height distribution (the capacitance of the Schottky contact comes from the modulation of the total space-charge as a function of bias). On the other hand, the value from I-V characterization is well below the value extracted from capacitance analysis, and is dominated by the current that flows through regions of lower barrier height. Also, the inhomogeneity of the barrier height is believed to be a primary reason for the observation of large ideality factors (n>1.1). For intimate contact and uniform MSI, the barrier height values extracted from C-V and I-V characterization are expected to be in close correlation, and ideality factors very close to unity.
A semiconductor device according to the present invention is a SiC Schottky diode which includes a SiC substrate of one conductivity, a silicon face SiC epitaxial body of the one conductivity formed on a first surface of a the SiC substrate, a Schottky metal barrier formed on the silicon face of the SiC epitaxial body, a back power electrode on a second surface of the SiC substrate opposite said first surface of the SiC substrate.
In one embodiment of the present invention the Schottky metal barrier is formed of Titanium, and the silicon face epitaxial SiC is 4H—SiC. It has been found that this combination results in a very uniform MSI, which allows for accurate electrical characterization of the device.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention which refers to the accompanying drawings.
A power semiconductor device according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention is a discrete Schottky diode that includes SiC substrate 10 (preferably 4H—SiC bulk SiC) of N-type conductivity, silicon face 4H—SiC epitaxial body 12 of N-type conductivity formed on one surface of substrate 10, Schottky metal body (Schottky barrier) 14 formed over and in Schottky contact with epitaxial body 12, and a back power electrode 16 formed on another opposite surface of substrate 10. A region of P-type conductivity 18 serving as a guard ring is diffused into epitaxial body 12, is in contact with Schottky body 14, and defines the other boundary of the active region (i.e. region defined by the Schottky contact between Schottky body 14 and epitaxial body 12) of the device. A device according to the preferred embodiment further includes a field insulation body 20 disposed on epitaxial body 12 and surrounding the active region of the device. Note that field insulation body 20 includes sidewalls 22 that taper toward the active region of the device, and that Schottky body 14 extends over sidewalls 22 and a portion of the top surface of field insulation body 20. A device according to the preferred embodiment further includes a metallic front power electrode 24 which is disposed over at least Schottky body 14.
In the preferred embodiment, Schottky body 14 is composed of titanium (which has been observed to make a uniform MSI with silicon face 4H—SiC), front power electrode 24 is composed of aluminum, back power electrode 16 is composed of a trimetal stack of titanium (in ohmic contact with substrate 10), nickel (formed on the titanium layer), and silver (formed on the nickel layer). Field insulation body 20 is preferably composed of silicon dioxide.
The behavior of the electrical parameters of a Schottky barrier diode (SBD) fabricated on the Si face of a 4H—SiC epitaxial layer according to the present invention was studied. The study revealed that the devices according to the present invention exhibit an electrical behavior in accordance to thermoionic emission and a good MSI uniformity confirmed by C-V measurements. I-V measurements (I-V) were also performed in a large temperature range which led to an evaluation of the Richardson constant.
Details of the Study
Schottky barrier diodes were fabricated on 3″ 4H—SiC wafers, production grade, produced by Cree Inc. Epitaxial body 12 and substrate 10 of wafers were n-doped (Nd=1016 cm−3, thickness 7 μm and Nd=1018 cm−3, thickness 380 μm, respectively). The junction extermination extension on fabricated devices was formed by a guard ring 18 obtained by P+ type implantation and a mesa structure with an additional ring of silicon oxide 20. Schottky barrier 14 was made by thermal evaporation of Titanium and a successive Aluminum layer 24. Ohmic contact 16 formation was made on the back-side of the wafer by a triple evaporation of Titanium, Nickel and Silver.
Fabricated devices were then packaged in a standard TO-220 commercial package.
All step processes were optimized in previous work, leading to obtain a percentage of working diodes with a reverse current<50 μA@600 V of reverse voltage up to 85%.
Electrical measurements were performed by an SMU237 Keithley Source Measure Unit and an SMU238 Keithley Source Measure Unit. Doping concentration was controlled by C-V measurements at the standard frequency of 1 MHz (HP 4192A LF).
Electrical characterization versus temperature was performed by using an Oxford cryostat. The measurements were performed on selected devices which passed reliability tests working 1000 hours in stress conditions.
Results
In order to avoid any problems related to fabrication process and surface preparation, devices were selected with behavior close to ideal.
A first electrical characterization was done by standard I-V and C-V measurements fitting data according to thermoionic emission theory (TET) in order to obtain ideality factor, barrier height, doping concentration and reverse current at 600 V. The mean values were 1.02, 1.21 eV, 81015 cm−3 and 30 μA. Break down voltage was higher than 1100 V, close to the ideal value. Twenty selected devices were tested further by voltage measurement versus time up to 1000 hour. The results demonstrated an optimal stability with unchanged characteristic.
Electrical measurements were performed in the range 77-300 K with a temperature step of 20 K by means of forward and reverse current voltage analysis.
Table 1 reports barrier height and ideality factor versus temperature extracted from experimental data, according to TET and by using the classical value of 146 A K−2 cm−2. It is worth noting that the ideality factor is close to 1.1 up to 77 K, and in the range 200-300 K is almost constant. This leads to the conclusion that the barrier/metal interface is very homogeneous which is confirmed also by the Schottky height barrier value obtained by C-V measurements (1.2 eV).
In order to obtain additional information, for the determination of the effective barrier height and of the AA product, saturation current density was extracted from experimental data in the range 200-300 K and reported in a Richardson's plot (
From the slope of the linear fit and from the intercept, one can obtain an effective value of barrier height of 1.16±0.1 eV and an effective Richardson's constant A=17±8 A K−2 cm−2. The Richardson's constant is different from the classical theoretical value. Many have tried to explain and model the Schottky contacts on SiC, in order to fit experimental data to the theoretical value. In theory, the value of the effective Richardson constant A* should be calculated for a semiconductor with indirect energy gap and a number MC of equivalent ellipsoidal constant energy surface in the first Brillouin zone, by considering diagonal components of the effective mass tensor. Such a theoretical calculation leads to Richardson constant values that are dependent on the particular crystallographic direction considered in Thermionic emission. The commonly reported value for the 4H—SiC Richardson constant was firstly calculated by loth et al., ISPSD '95 (1995) 101-106. It can be shown that such a value was obtained by simply averaging the effective mass value in Gotz et al., J. Appl. Phys., 73, No. 7, (1993) 3332-2228. neglecting any crystallographic anisotropy, and considering a number of equivalent conduction band minima equal to 6 (derived from the conduction band minimum location along the M-K edge of the first Brillouin zone reported in Tairov et al., “Electroluminescence”, J. I. Parkov, Ed., Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Springer-Verlag (1977). The location of the equivalent conduction band minima has been more recently demonstrated to be exactly at the M-point of the first Brillouin zone, and symmetry considerations lead to a number of equivalent minima MC equal to 3 (the constant energy surfaces are 6 semi-ellipsoids). Such a value for MC should be employed in the calculation of the effective Richardson constant of 4H—SiC.
Moreover, a modified Richardson constant A** should be derived from A* taking into account quantum mechanical tunneling and reflections at the Schottky interface and interactions of the emitted electrons with optical phonons, as suggested in Crowell et al., Solid-State Electron., 9 (1966) 1035-1048.
Such a complete model has never been applied to hexagonal materials, and to 4H—SiC in particular. Thus, the commonly accepted value of 146 A/cm2V2 was employed because it was estimated that an error of 30% in A* would affect the value of Schottky barrier height φB extracted from thermionic emission saturation current measurements of about 1%.
Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of co-pending, commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/581,536, filed on Oct. 16, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,368,165 by Giovanni Richieri, and titled “Silicon carbide schottky diode,” which claims the benefit of and priority to the provisional patent application, Ser. No. 60/728,728, filed on Oct. 20, 2005, by Giovanni Richieri, and titled “Silicon carbide schottky diode,” each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4036672 | Kobayashi | Jul 1977 | A |
4206540 | Gould | Jun 1980 | A |
4648175 | Metz, Jr. et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4672738 | Stengl et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4796084 | Kamasaki et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4862244 | Yamagishi | Aug 1989 | A |
4903189 | Ngo et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4990994 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5003372 | Kim et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5047833 | Gould | Sep 1991 | A |
5113237 | Stengl | May 1992 | A |
5233215 | Baliga | Aug 1993 | A |
5323040 | Baliga | Jun 1994 | A |
5362975 | von Windheim et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5384470 | Tachibana et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5436174 | Baliga et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5527745 | Dixit et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5689128 | Hshieh et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5712502 | Mitlehner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5747831 | Loose et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753938 | Thapar et al. | May 1998 | A |
5789311 | Ueno et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801836 | Bakowski et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5914500 | Bakowski et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915179 | Etou et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5932894 | Bakowski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5977605 | Bakowski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6040237 | Bakowski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040600 | Uenishi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040617 | Patel | Mar 2000 | A |
6100572 | Kinzer | Aug 2000 | A |
6150246 | Parsons | Nov 2000 | A |
6177712 | Miyasaka | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6207591 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229194 | Lizotte | May 2001 | B1 |
6303986 | Shook | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320205 | Pfirsch et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330967 | Milewski et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353252 | Yasuhara et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362495 | Schoen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373076 | Alok | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6410958 | Usui et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6432750 | Jeon et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6441455 | Dutta | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6498368 | Sakamoto et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509240 | Ren et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514782 | Wierer, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6562647 | Zandman et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573534 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6573537 | Steigerwald et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6586801 | Onishi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605862 | Van Dalen et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621122 | Qu | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622380 | Grigg | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624522 | Standing et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6630698 | Deboy et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635944 | Stoisiek | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6673662 | Singh | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6674126 | Iwamoto et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683347 | Fujihira | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6700141 | Iwamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713813 | Marchant | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6740931 | Kouzuki et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6762455 | Oppermann et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764906 | Darwish | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768170 | Zhou | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6791167 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812282 | Chang et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828609 | Deboy et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6844571 | Krames et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849900 | Aida et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6897133 | Collard | May 2005 | B2 |
6936850 | Friedrichs et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6949454 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960829 | Hogerl | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979862 | Henson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6992340 | Tanaka | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7034376 | Okada et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7073890 | Cabal et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7166890 | Sridevan | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173284 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7262434 | Okamura | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265045 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7265388 | Fukuda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7299538 | Tactic-Lucic | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315081 | Standing | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7394158 | Carta et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411218 | Seng et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7492003 | Kinzer | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507650 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7649213 | Hatakeyama et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7687907 | Okuda et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7718470 | Hsu | May 2010 | B2 |
7777292 | Ota et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812441 | Carta et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7834376 | Carta et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8368165 | Richieri | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8368211 | Standing et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8368223 | Standing | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20010043172 | McGrath et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052601 | Onishi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020063281 | Tihanyl | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064930 | Ishikawa | May 2002 | A1 |
20020076851 | Eden et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020109211 | Shinohara | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020171087 | Krames et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179909 | Uchida et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006425 | Bol et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030042538 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030075783 | Yoshihara et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030119300 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127747 | Kajiwara et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030162355 | Sankin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030168734 | Fang | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176031 | Onishi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183895 | Okamura et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040012930 | Grigg | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040051118 | Bruhns et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063240 | Madrid et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070060 | Mamitsu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040104489 | Larking | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040110330 | Collard | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113264 | Akerling et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135178 | Onose et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145380 | Babcock et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150040 | Nitta et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169262 | Oliver et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207092 | Burrell et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212011 | Ryu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212093 | Chopra et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040245570 | Ninomiya | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262685 | Zingg | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012143 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023680 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050029557 | Hatakeyama et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050034888 | Hoffmann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050067630 | Zhao | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072984 | Kwak et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050077615 | Yu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082570 | Sridevan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082611 | Peake et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091988 | Stewart et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116344 | Humpston | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136635 | Savastiouk et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139947 | Okada et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050200011 | Standing et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230715 | Hoshino et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050253168 | Wu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060003514 | Richieri | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060065899 | Hatakeyama et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060086939 | Carta et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060145283 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060145319 | Sun et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060214242 | Carta et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220027 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060226504 | Hatakeyama et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060255423 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070222025 | Husain et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228505 | Mazzola et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080237608 | Richieri | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080286968 | Carta et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090067630 | Daemen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104738 | Ring et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100068855 | Saxler et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110248284 | Carta et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110278591 | Carta et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19840032 | Nov 1999 | DE |
10002362 | Aug 2001 | DE |
0604194 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0681326 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0958923 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1349202 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1739753 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2579023 | Sep 1986 | FR |
1187698 | Jul 1989 | JP |
7302896 | Nov 1995 | JP |
09-036393 | Feb 1997 | JP |
11-087690 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11348355 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-022178 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2001313391 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-118268 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002158363 | May 2002 | JP |
2002261295 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003074951 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003258271 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003273127 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004079988 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-111759 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004099898 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-221513 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005079339 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-286197 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005-311347 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006-100593 | Apr 2006 | JP |
9727626 | Jul 1997 | WO |
0038242 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0143172 | Jun 2001 | WO |
03038906 | May 2003 | WO |
2005091988 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005093840 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006047382 | May 2006 | WO |
2006074382 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US05/38118 dated Feb. 6, 2007. (reference povided in the parent U.S. Pat. No. 8,368,165 per 37 C.F.R. 1.98(d).). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140042459 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60728728 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11581536 | Oct 2006 | US |
Child | 13759872 | US |