Single-arm robotic device with compact joint design and related systems and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11950867
  • Patent Number
    11,950,867
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 4, 2022
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 9, 2024
    24 days ago
Abstract
Disclosed herein are various robotic surgical devices and systems that include first and second elongate bodies, first and second driveshafts disposed through the second elongate body, and an in-line shoulder joint with a robotic arm coupled thereto. In certain implementations, the in-line shoulder joint has a differential yoke and a dual shaft disposed within the yoke lumen.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The various embodiments herein relate to various medical devices and related components, including robotic and/or in vivo surgical devices and related components, such as arms and end effectors. More specifically, disclosed herein are robotic surgical devices and systems for use in minimally invasive surgical procedures.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Advancements in minimally-invasive surgical (M.I.S.) techniques continue to combat the major drawbacks of open surgery, which include lengthy recovery times, increased chance of postoperative infection, distinct cosmetic remnants, and other such disadvantages. Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery is one type of M.I.S. technique and consists of the insertion of thin profiled tools and accessories into a gas-inflated abdominal region, eliminating the need for a large incision. However, these procedures also have limitations, including increased duration of surgery, reduction in visibility of the surgical site, and greater dexterity requirements of the surgeon. Accordingly, robotic platform integration has been introduced to the surgical field of medicine and looks to challenge these limitations.


A more recent minimally-invasive laparoscopic surgical technique is Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) (also commonly referred to as Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS)), which allows for access through a single incision into the abdomen. In order to operate, the surgeon must cross the tools through the port, causing a loss of triangulation, referred to as the “chopsticks effect.” This process has also included, in some instances, a shift in the type of passageway or access point into the peritoneal cavity from the traditional trocar to a single-port entry device.


While single-port entry systems for use in LESS/SILS procedures are currently insubstantial, one device that has gained popularity is the GelPort® (hereafter referred to as “GelPort”) system, which has been adapted to work as a passageway for trocars and robotic platforms.


By comparison, a traditional trocar is a relatively simple device that includes two known components: an outer sleeve (or “cannula”) and an obturator. The tube-like cannula acts as the actual passageway into the abdomen, while the obturator is the component with the generally sharp distal end that is positioned through the cannula and creates the passageway into the peritoneal cavity via the skin of the patient.


The industry standard in externally-actuated surgical robotic platforms is the Da Vinci® Surgical System (hereafter referred to as “Da Vinci”), which consists of a master-slave configuration in which the surgeon(s) operates from a remote console. Da Vinci is also capable of performing single-site surgery. Disadvantages of Da Vinci include cost (the system costs millions of dollars, making it unaffordable for smaller less funded hospitals), having a large base that takes up a good portion of the area surrounding the operating bed (as well as various additional consoles scattered throughout the operating room), and being a highly complex system that requires extensive training and experience before a surgeon can operate on a human.


There is a need in the art for an improved robotic surgical system.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Discussed herein are various single-armed robotic device embodiments with in-line shoulder joints.


In Example 1, a robotic device comprises a first elongate device body comprising first and second motors, a second elongate device body coupled to a distal end of the first elongate device body, a first driveshaft disposed through the second elongate device body and operably coupled to the first motor, a second driveshaft disposed through the second elongate device body and operably coupled to the second motor, the second driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a first bevel gear, a shoulder joint, and an arm operably coupled to the output body. The shoulder joint comprises a differential yoke rotationally coupled to the first driveshaft, a dual shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, and an output body rotatably disposed over the extension shaft. The differential yoke comprises a yoke body and a yoke lumen defined in the differential yoke, wherein the lumen has a longitudinal axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the body. In addition, the dual shaft comprises a rotational shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the rotational shaft rotationally coupled to the first bevel gear, and an extension shaft extending from the rotational shaft such that a longitudinal axis of the extension shaft is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft.


Example 2 relates to the robotic device according to Example 1, wherein the first driveshaft is rotatably disposed within and being radially concentric with the second driveshaft.


Example 3 relates to the robotic device according to Example 1, further comprising a third driveshaft operably coupled to a third motor, the third driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a second bevel gear, wherein the second bevel gear is operably coupled to the output body.


Example 4 relates to the robotic device according to Example 3, wherein the first driveshaft is rotatably disposed within and being radially concentric with the third driveshaft, and wherein the third driveshaft is rotatably disposed within and being radially concentric with the second driveshaft.


Example 5 relates to the robotic device according to Example 1, wherein the device has no second arm.


Example 6 relates to the robotic device according to Example 1, wherein the shoulder joint is a unitary shoulder joint.


Example 7 relates to the robotic device according to Example 1, wherein the second elongate device body has a cross-sectional diameter that is less than a cross-sectional diameter of the first elongate device body.


Example 8 relates to the robotic device according to Example 1, wherein the second elongate device body is sized and structured to be positionable through a standard trocar port.


Example 9 relates to the robotic device according to Example 1, wherein the shoulder joint is an in-line joint that is collinear with the second elongate device body.


In Example 10, a robotic device comprises a first elongate device body comprising first, second, and third motors disposed within the first elongate device body, a second elongate device body coupled to a distal end of the first elongate device body, a first driveshaft disposed through the second elongate device body and operably coupled to the first motor, a second driveshaft disposed through the second elongate device body and operably coupled to the second motor, the second driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a first bevel gear, a third driveshaft disposed through the second elongate device body and operably coupled to the third motor, the third driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a second bevel gear, a shoulder joint, and an arm operably coupled to the output body. The shoulder joint comprises a differential yoke rotationally coupled to the first driveshaft, a T shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, and an output body rotatably disposed over the extension shaft, the output body rotationally coupled to the first bevel gear. The differential yoke comprises a yoke body and a yoke lumen defined in the differential yoke, wherein the yoke lumen has a longitudinal axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the body. The T shaft comprises a rotational shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the rotational shaft rotationally coupled to the second bevel gear, and an extension shaft extending from the rotational shaft.


Example 11 relates to the robotic device according to Example 10, wherein the first driveshaft is rotatably disposed within and radially concentric with the second driveshaft, and wherein the second driveshaft is rotatably disposed within and radially concentric with the third driveshaft.


Example 12 relates to the robotic device according to Example 10, wherein the yoke lumen is defined by opposing first and second yoke lumen walls, the first yoke lumen wall comprising a first slot and the second yoke lumen wall comprising a second slot.


Example 13 relates to the robotic device according to Example 12, wherein the extension shaft is disposable within the first and second slots.


Example 14 relates to the robotic device according to Example 10, wherein a longitudinal axis of the extension shaft is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft.


Example 15 relates to the robotic device according to Example 10, wherein the first elongate device body has a cross-sectional diameter that is greater than a cross-sectional diameter of the second elongate device body.


Example 16 relates to the robotic device according to Example 10, wherein the arm comprises an upper arm body; a forearm body; an elbow joint coupling the forearm body to the upper arm body; an end effector; and a wrist joint coupling the end effector to the forearm body, wherein the upper arm body is operably coupled to the output body.


In Example 17, a robotic device comprises a first elongate device body comprising first, second, and third motors disposed within the first elongate device body, a second elongate device body coupled to a distal end of the first elongate device body, a first driveshaft disposed through the second elongate device body and operably coupled to the first motor, a second driveshaft disposed through the second elongate device body and operably coupled to the second motor, a third driveshaft disposed through the second elongate device body and operably coupled to the third motor, a shoulder joint, and an arm operably coupled to the output body. The second driveshaft is operably coupled at a distal end to a first bevel gear, wherein the first driveshaft is rotatably disposed within and radially concentric with the second driveshaft. The third driveshaft is operably coupled at a distal end to a second bevel gear, wherein the second driveshaft is rotatably disposed within and radially concentric with the third driveshaft. The shoulder joint comprises a differential yoke rotationally coupled to the first driveshaft, a T shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, and an output body rotatably disposed over the extension shaft, the output body rotationally coupled to the first bevel gear. The differential yoke comprises a yoke body and a yoke lumen defined in the differential yoke by opposing first and second curved shells, wherein the first curved shell comprises a first slot and the second curved shell comprises a second slot, and wherein the yoke lumen has a longitudinal axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the body. The T shaft comprises a rotational shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the rotational shaft rotationally coupled to the second bevel gear, and an extension shaft extending from the rotational shaft.


Example 18 relates to the robotic device according to Example 17, wherein the extension shaft is disposable within the first and second slots.


Example 19 relates to the robotic device according to Example 17, wherein the first elongate device body has a cross-sectional diameter that is greater than a cross-sectional diameter of the second elongate device body.


Example 20 relates to the robotic device according to Example 17, wherein the shoulder joint has a cross-sectional diameter that is less than or substantially similar to a cross-sectional diameter of the second elongate body.


While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various obvious aspects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a perspective view of a single-armed robotic device disposed through a trocar port, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 1B is a side view of the robotic device of FIG. 1A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 1C is a top view of the robotic device of FIG. 1A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2A is a side view of the first and second elongate bodies of a robotic device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2B is a cross-sectional cutaway side view of a portion of the first and second elongate bodies of the robotic device of FIG. 2A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2C is a cross-sectional, partial cutaway perspective view of an expanded portion of the first and second elongate bodies of the robotic device of FIG. 2A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2D is a cross-sectional, partial cutaway perspective view of an expanded portion of the second elongate body and shoulder joint of the robotic device of FIG. 2A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2E is a cross-sectional cutaway bottom view of the shoulder joint of the robotic device of FIG. 2A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2F is a exploded perspective view of the shoulder joint of the robotic device of FIG. 2A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional cutaway top view of a shoulder joint of a robotic device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a robotic arm and a portion of a second elongate body of a single-armed robotic device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 5A is a side view of an upper arm of a robotic arm of a robotic device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 5B is a cross-sectional cutaway side view of the elbow joint of the robotic arm of FIG. 5A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 6A is a perspective view of a forearm of a robotic arm, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 6B is a cross-sectional, partial cutaway perspective view of an expanded portion of the forearm of FIG. 6A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 6C is another cross-sectional, partial cutaway perspective view of an expanded portion of the forearm of FIG. 6A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 7A is a side view of the forearm of FIG. 6A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 7B is a cross-sectional cutaway side view of a portion of the forearm and the wrist joint of the forearm of FIG. 6A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 8A is a perspective view of a laparoscopic trocar, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 8B is a side view of the laparoscopic trocar of FIG. 8A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 9A is a perspective exterior view of a one-armed robotic device positioned within a target cavity of a patient, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 9B is a schematic view of the calculated workspace of the one-armed robotic device of FIG. 9A, according to one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The various robotic surgical device and system embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein include a robotic device having an elongate body having a minimal cross-sectional profile and a single robotic arm attached thereto via an in-line shoulder joint.


It is understood that the various implementations of robotic devices and related methods and systems disclosed herein can be incorporated into or used with any other known medical devices, systems, and methods. For example, the various implementations disclosed herein may be incorporated into or used with any of the medical devices and systems disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,492,116 (filed on Oct. 31, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,796 (filed on Apr. 3, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,073 (issued May 15, 2011, and entitled “Robotic Devices with Agent Delivery Components and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,171 (issued Jan. 1, 2013 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,679,096 (issued Mar. 25, 2014 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,828,024 (issued on Sep. 9, 2014 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,488 (issued Sep. 16, 2014 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Surgical Robotic Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,894,633 (issued Nov. 25, 2014 and entitled “Modular and Cooperative Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,267 (issued Mar. 3, 2015 and entitled “Methods and Systems for Handling or Delivering Materials for Natural Orifice Surgery”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,332 (issued Mar. 3, 2015 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Robotic Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,440 (issued Mar. 10, 2015 and entitled “Modular and Cooperative Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,010,214 (Apr. 21, 2015 and entitled “Local Control Robotic Surgical Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,060,781 (issued Jun. 23, 2015 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Surgical End Effectors”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,089,353 (issued Jul. 28, 2015 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,981 (issued on Nov. 10, 2015 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,498,292 (issued Nov. 22, 2016 and entitled “Single Site Robotic Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,579,088 (issued Feb. 28, 2017 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Visualization and Device Manipulation”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,743,987 (Aug. 29, 2017 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Robotic Surgical Devices, End Effectors, and Controllers”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,770,305 (issued Sep. 26, 2017 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), and U.S. Pat. No. 9,888,966 (issued Feb. 13, 2018 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Force Control Surgical Systems), all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.


Further, the various implementations disclosed herein may be incorporated into or used with any of the medical devices and systems disclosed in copending U.S. Published Applications 2014/0046340 (filed Mar. 15, 2013 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), 2014/0058205 (filed Jan. 10, 2013 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Access and Insertion”), 2014/0303434 (filed Mar. 14, 2014 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), 2015/0051446 (filed Jul. 17, 2014 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), 2016/0074120 (filed Sep. 14, 2015, and entitled “Quick-Release End Effectors and Related Systems and Methods”), 2016/0135898 (filed Nov. 11, 2015 entitled “Robotic Device with Compact Joint Design and Related Systems and Methods”), 2016/0157709 (filed Feb. 8, 2016 and entitled “Medical Inflation, Attachment, and Delivery Devices and Related Methods”), 2017/0035526 (filed Aug. 3, 2016 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), 2017/0354470 (filed May 18, 2017 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), 2018/0055584 (filed Aug. 30, 2017 and entitled “Robotic Device with Compact Joint Design and an Additional Degree of Freedom and Related Systems and Methods”), 2018/0056527 (filed Aug. 25, 2017 and entitled “Quick-Release End Effector Tool Interface”), 2018/0140377 (filed Nov. 22, 2017 and entitled “Gross Positioning Device and Related Systems and Methods”), 2018/0147019 (filed Nov. 29, 2017 and entitled “User Controller with User Presence Detection and Related Systems and Methods”), and 2018/0161122 (filed Dec. 14, 2017 and entitled “Releasable Attachment Device for Coupling to Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. In addition, the various implementations disclosed herein may be incorporated into or used with any of the medical devices and systems disclosed in copending U.S. application Ser. No. 16/144,807 (filed Sep. 27, 2018), which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Certain device and system implementations disclosed in the patents and/or applications listed above can be positioned within a body cavity of a patient in combination with a support component similar to those disclosed herein and/or in certain of the patents and/or applications incorporated by reference above. An “in vivo device” as used herein means any device that can be positioned, operated, or controlled at least in part by a user while being positioned within a body cavity of a patient, including any device that is disposed through an opening or orifice of the body cavity and is coupled to a support component such as a rod or other such component, also including any device positioned substantially against or adjacent to a wall of a body cavity of a patient, further including any such device that is internally actuated (having no external source of motive force), and additionally including any device that may be used laparoscopically or endoscopically during a surgical procedure. As used herein, the terms “robot,” and “robotic device” shall refer to any device that can perform a task either automatically or in response to a command.


Certain implementations provide for insertion of the present invention into the cavity while maintaining sufficient insufflation of the cavity. Further implementations minimize the physical contact of the surgeon or surgical users with the present invention during the insertion process. Other implementations enhance the safety of the insertion process for the patient and the present invention. For example, some implementations provide visualization of the present invention as it is being inserted into the patient's cavity to ensure that no damaging contact occurs between the system/device and the patient. In addition, certain implementations allow for minimization of the incision size/length. Further implementations reduce the complexity of the access/insertion procedure and/or the steps required for the procedure. Other implementations relate to devices that have minimal profiles, minimal size, or are generally minimal in function and appearance to enhance ease of handling and use.


As in manual laparoscopic procedures, a known insufflation system can be used to pump sterile carbon dioxide (or other gas) into the patient's abdominal cavity. This lifts the abdominal wall from the organs and creates space for the robot. In certain implementations, the system has no direct interface with the insufflation system. Alternatively, the system can have a direct interface to the insufflation system.


According to various embodiments, the insertion port is a traditional trocar or a modified trocar as described elsewhere herein. In such implementations, the device embodiments herein—or a portion thereof—are disposed through the cannula of the trocar in a fashion described in more detail below. Alternatively, in certain implementations, the insertion port is single-port entry device that is a known, commercially-available flexible membrane placed transabdominally to seal and protect the abdominal incision. One example of such a single-port entry device is the GelPort® discussed above. This off-the-shelf component is the same device used in the same way for Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS). The only difference is that the working arms of the robot are inserted into the abdominal cavity through the insertion port rather than the surgeon's hand. The robot body seals against the insertion port, thereby maintaining insufflation pressure. The port is single-use and disposable. In a further alternative, any known port can be used.


Certain implementations disclosed herein relate to “combination” or “modular” medical devices that can be assembled in a variety of configurations. For purposes of this application, both “combination device” and “modular device” shall mean any medical device having modular or interchangeable components that can be arranged in a variety of different configurations, and the related systems. The modular components and combination devices disclosed herein also include segmented triangular or quadrangular-shaped combination devices. These devices, which are made up of modular components (also referred to herein as “segments”) that are connected to create the triangular or quadrangular configuration, can provide leverage and/or stability during use while also providing for substantial payload space within the device that can be used for larger components or more operational components. As with the various combination devices disclosed and discussed above, according to one implementation these triangular or quadrangular devices can be positioned inside the body cavity of a patient in the same fashion as those devices discussed and disclosed above.


The various system implementations described herein are used to perform robotic surgery. Further, the various implementations disclosed herein can be used in a minimally invasive approach to a variety of procedures that are typically performed “open” by known technologies, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes and health care costs, including, for example, general surgery applications in the abdominal cavity, such as, for example, colon resection and other known procedures. Further, the various implementations disclosed herein can be used in place of the known mainframe-like laparoscopic surgical robots that reach into the body from outside the patient. That is, the less-invasive robotic systems, methods, and devices according to the implementations disclosed herein feature small, self-contained surgical devices that are inserted in their entireties through a single incision in the patient's abdomen. Designed to utilize existing tools and techniques familiar to surgeons, the devices disclosed herein will not require a dedicated operating room or specialized infrastructure, and, because of their much smaller size, are expected to be significantly less expensive than existing robotic alternatives for laparoscopic surgery. Due to these technological advances, the various implementations herein could enable a minimally invasive approach to procedures performed in open surgery today. In certain implementations, the various systems described herein are based on and/or utilize techniques used in manual laparoscopic surgery including insufflation of the abdominal cavity and the use of ports to insert tools into the abdominal cavity.


As will be described in additional detail below, components of the various system implementations disclosed or contemplated herein can include a control console and a robot having a minimal cross-sectional profile and a single robotic arm as described herein. The robot implementations are constructed and arranged to be inserted into the insufflated abdominal cavity as described in further detail herein.


While the various embodiments herein are described as having motors, it is understood that any type of known actuators can be used in place of the motors. Further, while the transmission components that transmit the force from the motors within the device are described as shafts that are coupled via gears, it is understood that any type of transmission components or mechanisms can be incorporated herein in place of such shafts and gears, including hydraulic or pneumatic components or other mechanical components such as cables and pulleys or similar components.


The various implementations are disclosed in additional detail in the attached figures and the related discussion thereof, as set forth herein.



FIGS. 1A-1C depict one embodiment of the single manipulator device (also referred to herein as the “unitary manipulator,” “single arm,” “unitary arm,” “in-line joint,” “in-line shoulder joint,” and “robotic surgical” device) 10 according to one embodiment. In this implementation, the device 10 has a first body (also referred to herein as an “external body” or “first support beam”) 12, a second body (also referred to herein as an “internal body” or “second support beam”) 14, a first arm component (also referred to herein as an “upper arm”) 16, a second arm component (also referred to herein as a “forearm”) 18, and an operational component (also referred to herein as an “end effector”) 20. In this embodiment as depicted and various other implementations herein, the internal body 14 has a smaller cross-sectional diameter than the external body 12 such that the internal body 14 can be inserted through a smaller port than would be possible for the external body 12, including, for example, a trocar port such as the port 28 depicted in FIG. 1A. Note in FIG. 1A that the internal body 14 is disposed through and positioned within the trocar port 28 such that the distal end of the internal body 14 extends out of the distal end of the trocar cannula 30. As such, the distal end of the internal body 14 and the shoulder joint 22 are disposed within the internal target cavity of the patient. The second body 14 is coupled to the first body 12. In certain embodiments, the first and second bodies 12, 14 are removably coupled. Alternatively, the first and second bodies 12, 14 are fixedly coupled or are integral with each other as a single, unitary component. In a further alternative, the first and second bodies 12, 14 are moveably coupled to each other in a jointed or other non-rigid fashion.


The first arm component 16 is rotatably coupled to the second body 14 via a first joint (also referred to herein as a “shoulder joint”) 22, while the second arm component 18 is rotatably coupled to the first arm component 16 via a third joint (also referred to herein as an “elbow joint”) 24, and the operational component 20 is rotataby coupled to the second arm component 18 via a fourth joint (also referred to herein as a “wrist joint”) 26. Each of these components will be discussed in further detail below, according to various embodiments of the robotic surgical device.


It is understood that the compact in-line (or “coaxial”) shoulder joint as described in additional detail with respect to the various embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein presents a less-invasive approach to the insertable portion of the robot in comparison to devices having shoulder joints that are not in-line, including those devices having two shoulder joints. That is, the in-line shoulder joint implementations herein have a smaller cross-sectional diameter in comparison to the known non-in-line or double shoulder joints.


One embodiment of a single-armed device 40, and more specifically the external body 42, the internal body 44, and shoulder joint 46 thereof, is depicted in further detail in FIGS. 2A-2F. Like every other implementation disclosed or contemplated herein, this specific device 40 embodiment has a shoulder joint 46 with 3 degrees of freedom (“DOF”) and a minimal cross-sectional diameter for ease of insertion through trocars and other insertion devices. The minimal diameter is accomplished via the specific design of the various components within the internal body 44 and the joint 46, as described in further detail below.



FIG. 2A depicts a side view of the device 40, including the external body 42, the internal body 44, and the shoulder joint 46. More specifically, the figure shows the external casing or housing 48 of the external body 42 and the external casing or housing 50 of the internal body 44.



FIG. 2B depicts a cross-sectional front view of the external body 42, the internal body 44, and the shoulder joint 46 in which certain internal components of those components are visible, according to one exemplary embodiment. In this implementation and other embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein, the external body 42 contains the actuators (which, in this specific embodiment are motors) 70A, 70B, 70C that actuate the shoulder joint 46 via the transmission shafts (also referred to herein as “nested driveshafts”) 52 disposed within the internal body 44. This configuration (with the motors 70A, 70B, 70C disposed within the external body 42 and the nested driveshafts 52 disposed in a nested configuration within the internal body 44 makes it possible for the internal body 44 to have a smaller cross-sectional diameter than the external body 42, as discussed above with respect to device 10. The set of nested driveshafts 52 are rotatably disposed within the internal body 44. As set forth herein, the word “nested” is intended to describe components that are concentric such that at least one of the components is positioned inside another of those components and each of the components have a common axis of rotation.


With respect to FIG. 2B, the set of nested driveshafts 52 is made up of a first or outer driveshaft 52A, a second or middle driveshaft 52B, and a third or inner driveshaft 52C. The set of nested driveshafts 52 extend from the external body 42 into and through the internal body 44 as shown. The inner driveshaft 52C is rotatably disposed within the middle driveshaft 52B as shown, and has a driven gear 54C fixedly or integrally attached at its proximal end. At its distal end, the inner driveshaft 52C is coupled to or integral with a differential yoke (also referred to herein as a “shoulder housing” or “conversion body”) 56C. The middle driveshaft 52B is rotatably disposed within the outer driveshaft 52A as shown, and has a driven gear 54B fixedly or integrally attached at its proximal end. At its distal end, the middle driveshaft 52B is coupled to a second or inner drive bevel gear 56B. The outer driveshaft 52A is rotatably disposed within the internal body 44 and has a driven gear 54A fixedly or integrally attached at its proximal end. At its distal end, the outer driveshaft 52A is coupled to a first or outer drive bevel gear 56A.


Various internal components at the proximal end of the internal body 44 and distal end of the external body 42 are best depicted in FIGS. 2B and 2C, including the proximal end of the driveshafts 52A, 52B, 52C and related gears and motors that drive those driveshafts 52A, 52B, 52C, according to one embodiment. As best shown in FIG. 2B, the proximal end of the inner driveshaft 52C is rotatably supported in the external body 42 via a first shaft bearing 60 and a second shaft bearing 62. Further, the proximal end of the middle driveshaft 52B, including the driven gear 54B, is rotatably supported in the external body 42 via the second shaft bearing 62 and a third shaft bearing 64. In addition, the proximal end of the outer driveshaft 52A, including driven gear 54A, is rotatably supported in the external body 42 via the third shaft bearing 64.


As best shown in FIGS. 2B and 2C, the set of nested driveshafts 52 has three motors operably coupled thereto (although only two of the three motors are visible), wherein the three motors are disposed within the external body 42 as discussed above. More specifically, motor 70A has a motor drive gear 72A that is coupled to the driven gear 54A (which is coupled to the outer driveshaft 52A). Further, motor 70C has a motor drive gear 72C that is coupled to the driven gear 54C (which is coupled to the inner driveshaft 52C). In addition, a third motor (logically identified as 70B but not visible in the figures due to the perspective thereof) has a third motor drive gear (logically identified as 72B but also not visible) that is coupled to the driven gear 54B (which is coupled to the middle driveshaft 52B). The positioning and functionality of the third motor and third motor drive gear are understood by one of ordinary skill in the art based on the description herein.


In one embodiment, the motors 70A, 70B, 70C are 12 volt Faulhaber 1226 series brushless DC motors coupled to Faulhaber 256:1 planetary gearboxes with an efficiency rating of 0.60. Alternatively, any known motors can be used in the external body 42.


Thus, in operation, the motor 70A can be actuated to drive rotation of the outer driveshaft 52A by driving rotation of motor drive gear 72A, which drives rotation of the driven gear 54A. Similarly, the motor 70B (not visible in the figures) can be actuated to drive rotation of the middle driveshaft 52B by driving rotation of motor drive gear 72B (also not visible), which drives rotation of the driven gear 54B. In a similar fashion, the motor 70C can be actuated to drive rotation of the inner driveshaft 52C by driving rotation of motor drive gear 72C, which drives rotation of the driven gear 54C.



FIGS. 2B, 2D, 2E, and 2F depict the shoulder joint 46 and its various components, according to one implementation. More specifically, FIG. 2D depicts a cross-sectional perspective view of the internal components of the joint 46, while FIG. 2E depicts a cross-sectional top view of the joint 46, and FIG. 2F depicts an exploded view of the internal components of the joint 46. As discussed above, and as shown in FIGS. 2B, 2D, and 2F, the outer driveshaft 52A is coupled (or rotationally constrained) to the outer drive bevel gear 56A, while the middle driveshaft 52B is coupled to the inner drive bevel gear 56B, and the inner driveshaft 52C is coupled to the differential yoke 56C. As best shown in FIG. 2B, at the distal end, the outer driveshaft 52A and outer drive bevel gear 56A are supported by the first shoulder bearing 80. In addition, the middle driveshaft 52B and the inner drive bevel gear 56B are supported by the first shoulder bearing 80 and the second shoulder bearing 82.


As best shown in FIGS. 2D and 2F, the differential yoke 56C has a cylindrical body 90 and a yoke opening or partial lumen 93 defined at the distal end of the body 90. In one implementation as shown, the lumen 93 is defined by two opposing curved shells (or “curved walls”) 92A, 92B that extend from the body 90 and define the yoke lumen 93 between the two shells 92A, 92B. In one embodiment, each of the two shells 92A, 92B is a set of two prongs, such that the first shell 92A is a first set of two curved prongs 92A and the second shell 92B is a second set of two curved prongs 92B. In addition, shaft slots 94A, 94B are defined in the two shells 92A, 92B. Thus, in those embodiments in which the shells 92A, 92B are prong pairs 92A, 92B, the shaft slots 94A, 94B are defined between each of two prongs of each set of prongs 92A, 92B. The cylindrical body 90 is disposed in the joint 46 such that its longitudinal axis is parallel to and concentric with the longitudinal axis of the internal body 44. In contrast, the yoke lumen 93 defined by the two shells 92A, 92B has a longitudinal axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the cylindrical body 90.


Further, the joint 46 has a dual shaft (also referred to herein as a “t-bar” or “T shaft”) 96 rotatably disposed within the yoke opening 93. The dual shaft 96 has a rotational shaft (also referred to as the “main shaft” or “pitch shaft”) 96A and an extension shaft (also referred to as the “roll shaft”) 96B. The extension shaft 96B has a longitudinal axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft 96A. The pitch shaft 96A is rotatably supported within the yoke opening 93 by the third 84 and fourth 86 shoulder bearings (as best shown in FIG. 2B)—along with the fifth 88 and sixth 89 shoulder bearings (also best shown in FIG. 2B)—such that the pitch shaft 96A rotates around a longitudinal axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the internal body 44 (and thus also the longitudinal axes of the set of nested driveshafts 52). Further, the pitch shaft 96A is coupled or rotationally constrained to the first shoulder bevel gear 100 such that rotation of the first shoulder gear 100 causes rotation of the rotational shaft 96A. The first shoulder gear 100 is rotatably coupled to the outer drive bevel gear 56A such that rotation of the outer drive bevel gear 56A causes rotation of the first shoulder gear 100. The bevel gear 100, the pitch shaft 96A, and the bearings 84, 86, 88, 89 are coupled together and “preloaded” by the screw 102 that is coupled to the pitch shaft 96A. Alternatively, any known attachment component can be used to couple together and preload these components. As such, rotation of the motor 70A causes rotation of the rotational shaft 96A and thus causes movement of the extension shaft 96B around the longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft 96A as described in additional detail below.


Continuing with FIGS. 2B, 2D, and 2F, the extension shaft 96B is coupled to or integral with the rotational shaft 96A and extends radially from the rotational shaft 96A such that the longitudinal axis of the extension shaft 96B is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft 96A, thereby resulting in the T-shaped configuration of the T shaft 96. When the pitch shaft 96A is rotatably disposed within the yoke opening 93 as described above, the extension shaft 96B extends from the rotational shaft 96A as best shown in FIG. 2F such that the extension shaft 96B is disposed in either of the shaft slots 94A, 94B between the prong sets 92A, 92B depending on the rotational position of the rotational shaft 96A. That is, as the rotational shaft 96A rotates, the extension shaft 96B rotates around the longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft 96A along a path that includes the two shaft slots 94A, 94B such that the extension shaft 96B can rotate at least 180° around the rotational shaft 96A.


Continuing with FIG. 2F, the shoulder joint 46 also has a second shoulder bevel gear 104 rotatably disposed on the end of the rotational shaft 96A opposite the first shoulder bevel gear 100 such that the second shoulder gear 104 can rotate in relation to the rotational shaft 96A. The second shoulder bevel gear 104 is rotatably coupled to the inner drive bevel gear 56B such that rotation of the inner drive bevel gear 56B causes rotation of the second shoulder bevel gear 104. Further, the second shoulder bevel gear 104 is also rotatably coupled to the output body (also referred to as the “roll body”) bevel gear 108 such that rotation of the second shoulder gear 104 causes rotation of the output body bevel gear 108. As such, rotation of the inner drive bevel gear 56B causes rotation of the output body 106, as described in additional detail below.


The output body 106 with the output body bevel gear 108 is rotatably disposed on the extension shaft 96B such that the output gear 108 and body 106 can rotate in relation to the extension shaft 96B. Thus, rotation of the output body bevel gear 108 around the extension shaft 96B caused by rotation of the second shoulder bevel gear 104 also causes rotation of the output body 106. Further, rotation of the extension shaft 96B around the rotational axis of the rotational shaft 96A causes both the extension shaft 96B and the output body 106 disposed thereon to also rotate around the rotational axis of the shaft 96A, thereby resulting in the pitch motion of the arm attached thereto (such as arm 130 or upper arm 150, for example).


In use, the outer drive bevel gear 56A is rotatably coupled to the first shoulder bevel gear 100 as discussed above such that rotation of the outer drive bevel gear 56A causes rotation of the first shoulder bevel gear 100. This rotation of the first shoulder bevel gear 100 causes rotation of the rotational shaft 96A, which causes the movement of the extension shaft 96B—and the output body 106 coupled thereto—radially around the longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft 96A, which results in pitch.


Further, the inner drive bevel gear 56B is rotatably coupled to the second shoulder bevel gear 104 as discussed above such that the rotation of the inner drive bevel gear 56B causes rotation of the second shoulder bevel gear 104. This rotation of the second shoulder bevel gear 104 causes rotation of the output body bevel gear 108, which causes rotation of the output body 106 around the extension shaft 96B, which results in roll.


In addition, the inner driveshaft 52C is coupled to—or integral with—the differential yoke 56C as discussed above such that rotation of the inner driveshaft 52C causes rotation of the differential yoke 56C, which results in yaw.


Thus, the shoulder joint 46 provides three degrees of freedom. The shoulder joint 46 configuration provides those three degrees of freedom while minimizing the cross-sectional size thereof. FIG. 2E depicts the greatest cross-sectional diameter of the shoulder joint 46, which is also the largest cross-sectional diameter of the internal components of the device 40 and any other device embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein. As such, according to certain implementations, the cross-sectional diameter of the second or internal body (such as internal body 44) is no greater (or not substantially greater) than the cross-sectional diameter of the shoulder joint (such as shoulder joint 46), as best shown by example in FIG. 2B. In one implementation, the shoulder joint 46 has a maximum diameter of about 15 mm, which means that the internal body 44, the shoulder joint 46, and the robotic arm (not shown) coupled thereto can be inserted through any trocar or other insertion device having a minimum internal diameter of about 15 mm.



FIG. 3 depicts yet another embodiment of a shoulder joint 120 with a similar configuration to the joint 46 discussed above and a maximum diameter of about 13.5 mm, meaning that any device embodiment having such a joint 120 can have an internal body, shoulder joint 120, and coupled robotic arm that can be inserted through any trocar or other insertion device having a minimum internal diameter of 13.5 mm.


Alternatively, any shoulder joint (such as joint 46 or 120) according to any embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein can have a maximum diameter ranging from about 13.5 mm to any desirable greater diameter. In a further embodiment, the maximum diameter of any such shoulder joint can be about 18 mm.


In the specific embodiments of FIGS. 1A-3 and the various other implementations disclosed or contemplated herein, one advantage of the in-line, three degree-of-freedom (“3 DOF”) shoulder joint is the resulting reduced cross-sectional profile. That is, the entire device (such as device 40 or other such embodiments herein) has a smaller cross-sectional diameter (transverse to the longitudinal axes of the body and the single arm) in comparison to known devices having motors (and other such actuators) in the body thereof, including such known devices with two arms. The known two-armed devices have two arms attached to a single body such that the arms have mirrored, symmetric functionality. This known two-armed mirrored configuration results in a device with a larger cross-sectional profile. In contrast, the single-armed device embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein have smaller cross-sectional profiles and thus can be incorporated into a system of two or more such devices that allow for positioning the two or more devices in various locations into a patient's abdomen through various incisions at different locations therein. Given the variation in human anatomy across patients, the positioning of procedural tools and accessories can vary significantly by patient such that the use of separate single-armed devices can provide an advantage. Further, the use of two or more separate single-armed devices provides spatial and operational independence between the two or more robotic arms, thereby enabling independent gross positioning capabilities. As such, the device (such as device 40 or any other embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein) can be inserted through a smaller opening (such as a trocar port, other known port, or incision, for example) for use in a medical procedure, or two or more such devices can be inserted through two or more openings, thereby resulting in a less invasive procedure than the known devices.


Further, as discussed above, the in-line, 3 DOF shoulder joint embodiments herein (such as, for example, joints 46 or 120) have a maximum diameter that is smaller than most separate shoulder joints in the known two-armed devices. This reduced cross-sectional diameter results from the in-line shoulder joint configuration that consists of the combination of the differential yoke (such as yoke 16C) and the dual shaft (such as dual shaft 96) and how those two components are positioned with the various gears within the shoulder to result in a minimal diameter. Using the shoulder joint 46 as an example, the disposition of the rotatable dual shaft 96 within the differential yoke 16C in combination with (1) the rotatable coupling of the inner drive shaft 52C and the differential yoke 56C, and (2) the rotatable coupling of the outer drive bevel gear 56A with the first shoulder bevel gear 100 and thus with the rotational shaft 96A of the dual shaft 96 results in minimized profile of the shoulder joint 46. That is, unlike most known shoulder joints, the radially outermost component of the shoulder joint 46 is the first shoulder bevel gear 100. Put another way, the component driven by the first shoulder bevel gear 100 is disposed in an interior radial position in relation to the gear 100, rather than a position that is radially outside the gear 100 in relation to the cross-sectional midpoint of the shoulder 46. In contrast, in most known/prior shoulder joints, such an outer bevel gear would be coupled to a component disposed on the radially outer side of the bevel gear, thus resulting in a great cross-section diameter in comparison to the shoulder joints disclosed and contemplated herein.


The “in-line” or collinear feature of the 3 DOF shoulder joint 46 results from the differential yoke 56C—with the dual shaft 96 rotatably disposed therein—being rotationally coupled to the inner drive shaft 52C. Thus, when the dual shaft 96 is disposed such that the rotational shaft 96A extends away from the internal body 44 and is parallel and concentric with the longitudinal axis of the internal body 44 (such that an upper arm of a robotic arm (not shown) coupled thereto is also parallel and concentric with the longitudinal axis of the internal body 44), the rotation of the inner drive shaft 52C causes the directly corresponding rotation of the differential yoke 56C (and thus directly corresponding rotation of the upper arm attached thereto).


In certain embodiments, as best shown in FIG. 4, a single-arm device 130 similar to the embodiments above has an external body (not shown), an internal body 132, a shoulder joint 134, and a single robotic arm 136 coupled to the single shoulder joint 134. Further, in accordance with some implementations, the arm 136 has two components: a first arm component (also referred to herein as an “upper arm”) 136A and a second arm component (also referred to herein as a “forearm”) 136B. Further, some embodiments have an operational component (also referred to herein as an “end effector”) 138 coupled to the arm 136.



FIGS. 5A and 5B depict one embodiment of an upper arm 150, according to one embodiment. This upper arm 150 embodiment can be fixedly coupled to the output body (such as output body 106 discussed above) of the joint (such as joint 46) such that the roll of the output body causes the upper arm 150 to rotate around its longitudinal axis. More specifically, the arm 150 has an opening 152 defined in its proximal end into which the output body (such as output body 106) can be disposed and thereby attached to the arm 150. Alternatively, any coupling mechanism, feature, or method can be used to couple the upper arm 150 to the output body.


The upper arm 150 also has an arm joint (also referred to herein as a “elbow joint”) 154 at its distal end that allows for a jointed coupling to a forearm (such as forearm 180 as discussed below). The elbow joint 154 has two opposing supports (or “projections”) 156A, 156B extending from or at the distal end of the upper arm 150 that define a space therebetween in which a coupling body 158 is rotatably disposed. Each of the supports 156A, 156B has a bearing 160A, 160B disposed on an inner wall thereof. The coupling body 158 has two rotational projections 162A, 162B, a coupling component 164, and a body bevel gear 166. The two rotational projections 162A, 162B, according to one implementation, are disposed within and rotatably coupled to the two bearings 160A, 160B, respectively, as best shown in FIG. 5B, such that the coupling body 158 can rotate in relation to the supports 156A, 156B. In this embodiment, the coupling component 164 is an opening 164 defined in the coupling body 158 that is configured to receive a portion of a forearm (such as forearm 180) such that the forearm portion is disposed within the opening 164 and the forearm is thereby coupled to the coupling body 158. Alternatively, the coupling component 164 can be any coupling mechanism, feature, or method can be used to couple the upper arm 150 to the forearm.


Further, the joint 154 includes an elbow joint bevel gear 168 that is coupled or rotationally constrained to an upper arm motor 170 such that actuation of the motor 170 causes rotation of the elbow joint bevel gear 168. The elbow joint bevel gear 168 is rotatably coupled to the body bevel gear 166 such that rotation of the elbow joint bevel gear 168 causes rotation of the body bevel gear 166, which thereby causes the coupling body 158 to rotate in relation to the supports 156A, 156B, thereby causing the forearm (such as forearm 180) coupled thereto to rotate in relation to the upper arm 150. Thus, actuation of the upper arm motor 170 can cause the forearm (such as forearm 180) to rotate in relation to the upper arm 150 at the elbow joint 154.


In one implementation, the upper arm 150 has additional space within the arm 150 (beyond the space occupied by the upper arm motor 170) to house additional components as necessary. For example, in one embodiment, one or more controllers (not shown) for controlling various components—including motors—of the arm or the robotic device can be disposed within the upper arm 150.



FIGS. 6A-6C depict one embodiment of an forearm 180, according to one embodiment. This forearm 180 embodiment can be fixedly coupled to the coupling component 164 of the coupling body 158 at the coupling projection 188 at the proximal end of the forearm 180. It is understood that any coupling mechanism or method can be used for this attachment.


The forearm 180 in this implementation has a wrist joint 182 at the distal end thereof, with an operational component (“end effector”) 184 coupled to the wrist joint 182. In this specific embodiment, the end effector 184 is a grasper 184, but it is understood that the end effector 184 is removable and thus various known, interchangeable end effectors 184 can be used herewith. Further, as best shown in FIGS. 6B and 6C, the forearm 180 in this embodiment has three motors disposed within the body 190 of the forearm 180: the first motor 186A, the second motor 186B, and the third motor 186C.


One embodiment of the wrist joint 182 is depicted in additional detail in FIGS. 7A and 7B. More specifically, FIG. 7B depicts a cross-sectional front view of the distal portion of the forearm body 190 and the wrist joint 182 in which certain internal components are visible, according to one exemplary embodiment. The forearm body 190 has a set of nested driveshafts 192 rotatably disposed within the body 190 that extend into the wrist joint 182. The set of nested driveshafts 192 is made up of a first or outer driveshaft 192A, a second or middle driveshaft 192B, and a third or inner driveshaft 192C. The set of nested driveshafts 192 extend from the forearm body 190 into the wrist joint 182 as shown. The inner driveshaft 192C is rotatably disposed within the middle driveshaft 192B as shown, and has a driven gear 194C fixedly or integrally attached at its proximal end. At its distal end, the inner driveshaft 192C is rotatably coupled to a first or inner drive bevel gear 196C. The middle driveshaft 192B is rotatably disposed within the outer driveshaft 192A as shown, and has a driven gear 194B fixedly or integrally attached at its proximal end. At its distal end, the middle driveshaft 192B is coupled to a second or middle drive bevel gear 196B. The outer driveshaft 192A is rotatably disposed within the forearm body 190 and wrist 182 and has a driven gear 194A fixedly or integrally attached at its proximal end. At its distal end, the outer driveshaft 192A is coupled to a first or outer drive bevel gear 196A.


Continuing with FIG. 7B, the proximal end of the inner driveshaft 192C is rotatably supported in the forearm body 190 via a first shaft bearing 198 and a second shaft bearing 200. Further, the proximal end of the middle driveshaft 192B, including the driven gear 194B, is rotatably supported via the second shaft bearing 200 and a third shaft bearing 202. In addition, the proximal end of the outer driveshaft 192A, including driven gear 194A, is rotatably supported via the third shaft bearing 202.


The set of nested driveshafts 192 has three motors operably coupled thereto. More specifically, motor 186B (of FIG. 6C) has an motor drive gear 204A (shown in FIG. 7A, but not visible in FIG. 7B) that is coupled to the driven gear 194A (which is coupled to the outer driveshaft 192A). Further, motor 186A (of FIG. 6C) has a motor drive gear 204C that is coupled to the driven gear 194C (which is coupled to the inner driveshaft 192C). In addition, motor 186C (of FIG. 6C) has a motor drive gear 204B (also not visible in the figures) that is coupled to the driven gear 194B (which is coupled to the middle driveshaft 192B).


Thus, in operation, the motor 186B can be actuated to drive rotation of the outer driveshaft 192A by driving rotation of motor drive gear 204A, which drives rotation of the driven gear 194A. Similarly, the motor 186C can be actuated to drive rotation of the middle driveshaft 192B by driving rotation of motor drive gear 204B (also not visible), which drives rotation of the driven gear 194B. In a similar fashion, the motor 186A can be actuated to drive rotation of the inner driveshaft 192C by driving rotation of motor drive gear 204C, which drives rotation of the driven gear 194C.


At the distal end, the outer driveshaft 192A and outer drive bevel gear 196A are supported by the first wrist bearing 210. In addition, the middle driveshaft 192B and the middle drive bevel gear 196B are supported by the first wrist bearing 210 and the second wrist bearing 212.


The inner drive bevel gear 196C is rotatably coupled to a differential yoke 220 having two rotational projections 222A, 222B, an extension shaft 224 that extends into the end effector body 244, and a yoke bevel gear 226. The differential yoke 220 is similar to the differential yoke 56C of the shoulder joint 46 discussed above and thus conveys the same or similar in-line benefits to those of the yoke 56C, including the minimal cross-sectional profile and the in-line configuration as discussed in detail above. The inner drive bevel gear 196C rotatably couples to the yoke bevel gear 226. As such, rotation of the inner drive bevel gear 196C causes the rotation of the differential yoke 220 around the rotational projections 222A, 222B such that the extension shaft 224 is caused to rotate around the longitudinal axis of the yoke 220 that extends from the first rotational projection 222A to the second 222B.


The middle drive bevel gear 196B is rotatably coupled to a first wrist bevel gear 230, which is rotatably disposed over the first inner rotational projection 222A. In addition, the first wrist bevel gear 230 is also rotatably disposed over the first outer rotational projection 246A extending from the first wrist support bracket 246. The first wrist support bracket 246 extends from the distal end of the forearm body 190. As such, the first wrist bevel gear 230 is rotatably supported by the first inner rotational projection 222A and the first outer rotational projection 246A. Further, the first wrist bevel gear 230 is rotatably coupled to the end effector output bevel gear 232, which is coupled to or integral with the end effector output body 234. Thus, rotation of the middle drive bevel gear 196B causes rotation of the first wrist bevel gear 230, which causes rotation of the end effector output bevel gear 232, which causes rotation of the end effector output body 234. In certain embodiments, the output body 234 is operably coupled to the end effector to actuate the end effector in some fashion, depending on the type of end effector.


The outer drive bevel gear 196A is rotatably coupled to the second wrist bevel gear 240, which is rotatably disposed over the second inner rotational projection 222B. In addition, the second wrist bevel gear 240 is also rotatably disposed over the second outer rotational projection 248A extending from the second wrist support bracket 248. The second wrist support bracket 248 extends from the distal end of the forearm body 190 in a fashion similar to the first wrist support bracket 246. As such, the second wrist bevel gear 240 is rotatably supported by the second inner rotational projection 222B and the second outer rotational projection 248A. Further, the second wrist bevel gear 240 is rotatably coupled to the end effector rotation bevel gear 242, which is coupled to or integral with the end effector body 244. Thus, rotation of the outer drive bevel gear 196A causes rotation of the second wrist bevel gear 240, which causes rotation of the end effector rotation bevel gear 242, which causes rotation of the end effector body 244, thereby causing rotation of the end effector around its longitudinal axis.


The wrist joint embodiment 182 discussed above is a compact dexterous wrist joint. Given the unpredictable nature of a patient's anatomy, the criticality of a robotic device providing as much control as possible to a surgeon for the purpose of completing a surgical task, and the importance of tool dexterity in surgical procedures, the dexterity of the wrist joint in a robotic arm is important. There are known devices that provide a wrist joint with seven degrees of freedom, but those devices have arm and end effector actuation via actuators (which are typically motors) disposed outside the patient's body, such as, for example, the EndoWrist® of the Da Vinci® system. The use of mechanical (cables, etc.), pneumatic, hydraulic, or other such force transmission systems make it possible for the EndoWrist and other such devices to maintain a smaller profile while having great dexterity. In contrast, to date, known devices having actuators (such as motors) disposed within the patient's body or the opening through which the device is positioned have not been able to approach that number of degrees of freedom or the corresponding amount of dexterity. However, the wrist embodiments (such as wrist joint 182) provide additional dexterity in comparison to other known devices with internal actuators. That is, the wrist joint 182 provides three degrees of freedom while minimizing its cross-sectional profile due to the joint 182 configuration. More specifically, as mentioned above, the configuration of the wrist joint 182 with the differential yoke 220 that is similar to the differential yoke 56C of the shoulder joint 46 results in similar features and functionality, including the minimal cross-sectional diameter and the in-line configuration.



FIGS. 8A and 8B depict one example of a trocar 250 according to one embodiment that is sized and configured to allow for receiving therethrough the various robotic device embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein. The trocar 250 has a port (or “seal”) 252 and a cannula 254 extending from the port 252. The port 252 and cannula 254 define an inner lumen 256 having a diameter that is large enough to receive any arm and internal body of any device implementation disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, the cannula 254 has a length such that the shoulder joint of the robotic device positioned therethrough extends through and is positioned distally out of the distal end 258 of the cannula 254, thereby allowing the arm coupled to the shoulder joint to move in any direction as desired without being hindered or obstructed by the cannula 254. As also discussed elsewhere herein, in addition to this trocar 250 and any other known laparoscopic trocar, it is understood that any insertion device of the appropriate size (including any type of port) or any incision of the appropriate size can be used with the various device embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein.


Trocar ports such as the trocar 250 described above and other known trocars can have certain advantages over known single-site entry ports. For example, insertion of certain known robotic devices through the single-site entry port can cause structural damage to the robotic device as a result of the physical contact between the port and the device. In addition, such known single-site entry ports require a larger incision in the patient than standard trocars require.


In use, one embodiment of a single-arm robotic device 270 is depicted in FIGS. 9A and 9B in a surgical environment. More specifically, FIG. 9A provides an external view of the device 270 positioned in a patient 272 through a trocar 274 such that the device 270 is in its operational configuration. That is, the device 270 is positioned into the target cavity (not shown) of the patient 272 such that the robotic arm (not shown) can be used to perform the desired procedure therein. In this embodiment, the device 270 is stabilized and/or maintained in the desired operational position via a known external support 276 that is coupled to the external body 278 of the device 270.


Further, FIG. 9B is a schematic view of the device 270 and the visual representation of the workspace 280 in which the device 270 can operate. More specifically, the workspace 280 is the visual representation of the full area that the end effector 284 coupled to the single arm 282 can reach. As such, the device 270 can be positioned within a target cavity in a patient such as the patient 272 in FIG. 9B such that the interior body 286 extends into the target cavity, resulting in the robotic arm 282 being disposed therein. In this specific embodiment, the device 270, which has components and functionality similar to the various other device embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein, can manipulate or otherwise position the arm 282 such that the end effector 284 can extend to all of the areas defined by the workspace 280. Thus, the end effector 284 can be used to perform a procedure at any location within that workspace 280.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A robotic device comprising: (a) an elongate device body comprising: (i) a proximal section comprising a proximal section diameter;(ii) a distal section comprising a distal section diameter, wherein the distal section diameter is less than the proximal section diameter; and(iii) first and second motors disposed within the device body;(b) a first driveshaft operably coupled to the first motor;(c) a second driveshaft operably coupled to the second motor, the second driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a first bevel gear;(d) a shoulder joint comprising: (i) a differential yoke rotationally coupled to the first driveshaft, the differential yoke comprising a yoke body and a yoke lumen defined in the differential yoke, wherein the lumen has a longitudinal axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the yoke body, and wherein the differential yoke rotates around a first rotational axis; and(ii) a dual shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the dual shaft comprising: (A) a rotational shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the rotational shaft rotationally coupled to the first bevel gear, wherein the rotational shaft rotates around a second rotational axis; and(B) an extension shaft extending from the rotational shaft such that a longitudinal axis of the extension shaft is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft; and(iii) an output body rotatably disposed around the extension shaft such that the extension shaft is rotatably disposed within a lumen of the output body, and wherein the output body rotates around a third rotational axis,wherein the first, second, and third rotational axes intersect at a single point; and(e) an arm operably coupled to the output body.
  • 2. The robotic device of claim 1, wherein the extension shaft is fixedly attached to the rotational shaft.
  • 3. The robotic device of claim 1, further comprising a third driveshaft operably coupled to a third motor, the third driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a second bevel gear, wherein the second bevel gear is operably coupled to the output body.
  • 4. The robotic device of claim 1, wherein the shoulder joint is a unitary shoulder joint.
  • 5. The robotic device of claim 1, wherein the distal section is sized and structured to be positionable through a trocar port.
  • 6. A robotic device of comprising: (a) an elongate device body comprising: (i) a proximal section comprising a proximal section diameter;(ii) a distal section comprising a distal section diameter, wherein the distal section diameter is less than the proximal section diameter; and(iii) first and second motors disposed within the device body;(b) a first driveshaft operably coupled to the first motor;(c) a second driveshaft operably coupled to the second motor, the second driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a first bevel gear;(d) a shoulder joint comprising: (i) a differential yoke rotationally coupled to the first driveshaft, the differential yoke comprising a yoke body and a yoke lumen defined in the differential yoke, wherein the lumen has a longitudinal axis that is transverse to the longitudinal axis of the yoke body; and(ii) a dual shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the dual shaft comprising: (A) a rotational shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the rotational shaft rotationally coupled to the first bevel gear; and(B) an extension shaft extending from the rotational shaft such that a longitudinal axis of the extension shaft is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft; and(iii) an output body rotatably disposed around the extension shaft such that the extension shaft is rotatably disposed within a lumen of the output body,wherein the shoulder joint is an in-line joint that is collinear with the distal section; and(e) an arm operably coupled to the output body.
  • 7. A robotic device comprising: (a) an elongate device body comprising first, second, and third motors disposed within the elongate device body;(b) a first driveshaft disposed through the elongate device body and operably coupled to the first motor;(c) a second driveshaft disposed through the elongate device body and operably coupled to the second motor, the second driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a first shoulder gear;(d) a third driveshaft disposed through the elongate device body and operably coupled to the third motor, the third driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a second shoulder gear;(e) a shoulder joint comprising: (i) a differential yoke rotationally coupled to the first driveshaft, the differential yoke comprising a yoke lumen defined in the differential yoke; and(ii) a T shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the T shaft comprising: (A) a rotational shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the rotational shaft rotationally coupled to the first shoulder gear; and(B) an extension shaft extending from the rotational shaft;(iii) an output body rotatably disposed over the extension shaft, the output body rotationally coupled to the second shoulder gear,wherein the first shoulder gear defines a radial outer limit of the shoulder joint; and(f) an arm operably coupled to the output body.
  • 8. The robotic device of claim 7, wherein the yoke lumen is defined by opposing first and second yoke lumen walls, the first yoke lumen wall comprising a first slot and the second yoke lumen wall comprising a second slot.
  • 9. The robotic device of claim 8, wherein the extension shaft is positionable within the first and second slots.
  • 10. The robotic device of claim 7, wherein a longitudinal axis of the extension shaft is transverse to a longitudinal axis of the rotational shaft.
  • 11. The robotic device of claim 7, wherein the elongate device body comprises a proximal section and a distal section, wherein the proximal section has a cross-sectional diameter that is greater than a cross-sectional diameter of the distal section.
  • 12. The robotic device of claim 7, wherein the arm comprises an upper arm body; a forearm body; an elbow joint coupling the forearm body to the upper arm body; an end effector; and a wrist joint coupling the end effector to the forearm body, wherein the upper arm body is operably coupled to the output body.
  • 13. The robotic device of claim 7, wherein the first driveshaft is disposed within the third driveshaft, and wherein the third driveshaft is disposed within the second driveshaft.
  • 14. A robotic device comprising: (a) an elongate device body comprising first and second motors disposed therein;(b) a first driveshaft disposed through the device body and operably coupled to the first motor;(c) a second driveshaft disposed through the device body and operably coupled to the second motor, the second driveshaft operably coupled at a distal end to a first bevel gear;(d) a shoulder joint comprising: (i) a differential yoke fixedly attached to the first driveshaft, the differential yoke comprising a yoke lumen defined in the differential yoke; and(ii) a dual shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the dual shaft comprising: (A) a rotational shaft rotatably disposed within the yoke lumen, the rotational shaft rotationally coupled to the first bevel gear; and(B) an extension shaft extending from the rotational shaft; and(iii) an output body rotatably disposed around the extension shaft such that the extension shaft is rotatably disposed within a lumen of the output body; and(e) an arm operably coupled to the output body.
  • 15. The robotic device of claim 14, wherein the extension shaft is positionable within first and second slots of the differential yoke.
  • 16. The robotic device of claim 14, wherein the elongate device body comprises a proximal section and a distal section, wherein the proximal section has a cross-sectional diameter that is greater than a cross-sectional diameter of the distal section.
  • 17. The robotic device of claim 16, wherein the shoulder joint has a cross-sectional diameter that is less than or substantially similar to a cross-sectional diameter of the distal section.
  • 18. The robotic device of claim 16, wherein the shoulder joint is an in-line joint that is collinear with the proximal and distal sections.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application claims priority as a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/236,489, filed Apr. 21, 2021 and entitled “Single-Manipulator Robotic Device with Compact Joint Design and Related Systems and Methods,” which claims priority as a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/241,263, filed Jan. 7, 2019 and entitled “Single-Manipulator Robotic Device with Compact Joint Design and Related Systems and Methods,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,013,564 on May 25, 2021, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 62/614,127, filed Jan. 5, 2018 and entitled “Single-Manipulator Robotic Device With Compact Joint Design,” which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under Grant No. W81XWH-08-02-0043, awarded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command; and Grant No. W81XWH-09-2-0185, awarded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. The government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (676)
Number Name Date Kind
2858947 Chapman, Jr. Nov 1958 A
3817403 Glachet et al. Jun 1974 A
3870264 Robinson Mar 1975 A
3922930 Fletcher et al. Dec 1975 A
3971266 Inakura Jul 1976 A
3989952 Hohmann Nov 1976 A
4246661 Pinson Jan 1981 A
4258716 Sutherland Mar 1981 A
4278077 Mizumoto Jul 1981 A
4353677 Susnjara et al. Oct 1982 A
4538594 Boebel et al. Sep 1985 A
4568311 Miyake Feb 1986 A
4576545 Maeda Mar 1986 A
4623183 Aomori Nov 1986 A
4636138 Gorman Jan 1987 A
4645409 Gorman Feb 1987 A
4684313 Minematsu et al. Aug 1987 A
4736645 Zimmer Apr 1988 A
4762455 Coughlan et al. Aug 1988 A
4771652 Zimmer Sep 1988 A
4852391 Ruch et al. Aug 1989 A
4854808 Bisiach Aug 1989 A
4896015 Taboada et al. Jan 1990 A
4897014 Tietze Jan 1990 A
4922755 Oshiro et al. May 1990 A
4922782 Kawai May 1990 A
4984959 Kato Jan 1991 A
4990050 Tsuge et al. Feb 1991 A
5019968 Wang et al. May 1991 A
5036724 Rosheim Aug 1991 A
5108140 Bartholet Apr 1992 A
5172639 Wiesman et al. Dec 1992 A
5176649 Wakabayashi Jan 1993 A
5178032 Zona et al. Jan 1993 A
5187032 Sasaki et al. Feb 1993 A
5187796 Wang et al. Feb 1993 A
5195388 Zona et al. Mar 1993 A
5201325 Mcewen et al. Apr 1993 A
5217003 Wilk Jun 1993 A
5263382 Brooks et al. Nov 1993 A
5271384 Mcewen et al. Dec 1993 A
5284096 Pelrine et al. Feb 1994 A
5297443 Wentz Mar 1994 A
5297536 Wilk Mar 1994 A
5304899 Sasaki et al. Apr 1994 A
5305653 Ohtani et al. Apr 1994 A
5307447 Asano et al. Apr 1994 A
5353807 Demarco Oct 1994 A
5363935 Schempf et al. Nov 1994 A
5372147 Lathrop, Jr. et al. Dec 1994 A
5382885 Salcudean et al. Jan 1995 A
5388528 Pelrine et al. Feb 1995 A
5397323 Taylor et al. Mar 1995 A
5436542 Petelin et al. Jul 1995 A
5441494 Ortiz Aug 1995 A
5456673 Ziegler et al. Oct 1995 A
5458131 Wilk Oct 1995 A
5458583 Mcneely et al. Oct 1995 A
5458598 Feinberg et al. Oct 1995 A
5471515 Fossum et al. Nov 1995 A
5515478 Wang May 1996 A
5524180 Wang et al. Jun 1996 A
5553198 Wang et al. Sep 1996 A
5562448 Mushabac Oct 1996 A
5588442 Scovil et al. Dec 1996 A
5620417 Jang et al. Apr 1997 A
5623582 Rosenberg Apr 1997 A
5624380 Kaneko et al. Apr 1997 A
5624398 Smith et al. Apr 1997 A
5632761 Smith et al. May 1997 A
5645520 Nakamura et al. Jul 1997 A
5657429 Wang et al. Aug 1997 A
5657584 Hamlin Aug 1997 A
5667354 Nakazawa Sep 1997 A
5672168 De La Torre et al. Sep 1997 A
5674030 Sigel Oct 1997 A
5728599 Rostoker et al. Mar 1998 A
5736821 Suyama Apr 1998 A
5754741 Wang et al. May 1998 A
5762458 Wang et al. Jun 1998 A
5769640 Jacobus et al. Jun 1998 A
5791231 Cohn et al. Aug 1998 A
5792135 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5797538 Heaton et al. Aug 1998 A
5797900 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5807377 Madhani et al. Sep 1998 A
5808665 Green Sep 1998 A
5815640 Wang et al. Sep 1998 A
5825982 Wright et al. Oct 1998 A
5833656 Smith et al. Nov 1998 A
5841950 Wang et al. Nov 1998 A
5845646 Lemelson Dec 1998 A
5855583 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5876325 Mizuno et al. Mar 1999 A
5878193 Wang et al. Mar 1999 A
5878783 Smart Mar 1999 A
5895377 Smith et al. Apr 1999 A
5895417 Pomeranz et al. Apr 1999 A
5906591 Dario et al. May 1999 A
5907664 Wang et al. May 1999 A
5910129 Koblish et al. Jun 1999 A
5911036 Wright et al. Jun 1999 A
5954692 Smith et al. Sep 1999 A
5971976 Wang et al. Oct 1999 A
5993467 Yoon Nov 1999 A
6001108 Wang et al. Dec 1999 A
6007550 Wang et al. Dec 1999 A
6030365 Laufer Feb 2000 A
6031371 Smart Feb 2000 A
6058323 Lemelson May 2000 A
6063095 Wang et al. May 2000 A
6066090 Yoon May 2000 A
6086529 Arndt Jul 2000 A
6102850 Wang et al. Aug 2000 A
6106521 Blewett et al. Aug 2000 A
6107795 Smart Aug 2000 A
6132368 Cooper Oct 2000 A
6132441 Grace Oct 2000 A
6139563 Cosgrove et al. Oct 2000 A
6156006 Brosens et al. Dec 2000 A
6159146 El Gazayerli Dec 2000 A
6162171 Ng et al. Dec 2000 A
D438617 Cooper et al. Mar 2001 S
6206903 Ramans Mar 2001 B1
D441076 Cooper et al. Apr 2001 S
6223100 Green Apr 2001 B1
D441862 Cooper et al. May 2001 S
6238415 Sepetka et al. May 2001 B1
6240312 Alfano et al. May 2001 B1
6241730 Alby Jun 2001 B1
6244809 Wang et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246200 Blumenkranz et al. Jun 2001 B1
D444555 Cooper et al. Jul 2001 S
6286514 Lemelson Sep 2001 B1
6292678 Hall et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293282 Lemelson Sep 2001 B1
6296635 Smith et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309397 Julian et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309403 Minor et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312435 Wallace et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321106 Lemelson Nov 2001 B1
6327492 Lemelson Dec 2001 B1
6331181 Tierney et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346072 Cooper Feb 2002 B1
6352503 Matsui et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364888 Niemeyer et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371952 Madhani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394998 Wallace et al. May 2002 B1
6398726 Ramans et al. Jun 2002 B1
6400980 Lemelson Jun 2002 B1
6408224 Okamoto et al. Jun 2002 B1
6424885 Niemeyer et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432112 Brock et al. Aug 2002 B2
6436107 Wang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441577 Blumenkranz et al. Aug 2002 B2
6450104 Grant et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450992 Cassidy Sep 2002 B1
6451027 Cooper et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454758 Thompson et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459926 Nowlin et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463361 Wang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468203 Belson Oct 2002 B2
6468265 Evans et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470236 Ohtsuki Oct 2002 B2
6491691 Morley et al. Dec 2002 B1
6491701 Tierney et al. Dec 2002 B2
6493608 Niemeyer Dec 2002 B1
6496099 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B2
6497651 Kan et al. Dec 2002 B1
6508413 Bauer et al. Jan 2003 B2
6512345 Borenstein et al. Jan 2003 B2
6522906 Salisbury et al. Feb 2003 B1
6544276 Azizi Apr 2003 B1
6548982 Papanikolopoulos et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554790 Moll Apr 2003 B1
6565554 Niemeyer May 2003 B1
6574355 Green Jun 2003 B2
6587750 Gerbi et al. Jul 2003 B2
6591239 Mccall et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594552 Nowlin et al. Jul 2003 B1
6610007 Belson et al. Aug 2003 B2
6620173 Gerbi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6642836 Wang et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645196 Nixon et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646541 Wang et al. Nov 2003 B1
6648814 Kim et al. Nov 2003 B2
6659939 Moll et al. Dec 2003 B2
6661571 Shioda et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671581 Niemeyer et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676684 Morley et al. Jan 2004 B1
6684129 Salisbury et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685648 Flaherty et al. Feb 2004 B2
6685698 Morley et al. Feb 2004 B2
6687571 Byrne et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692485 Brock et al. Feb 2004 B1
6699177 Wang et al. Mar 2004 B1
6699235 Wallace et al. Mar 2004 B2
6702734 Kim et al. Mar 2004 B2
6702805 Stuart Mar 2004 B1
6714839 Salisbury et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714841 Wright et al. Mar 2004 B1
6719684 Kim et al. Apr 2004 B2
6720988 Gere et al. Apr 2004 B1
6726699 Wright et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728599 Wang et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730021 Vassiliades et al. May 2004 B2
6731988 Green May 2004 B1
6746443 Morley et al. Jun 2004 B1
6764441 Chiel et al. Jul 2004 B2
6764445 Ramans et al. Jul 2004 B2
6766204 Niemeyer et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770081 Cooper et al. Aug 2004 B1
6774597 Borenstein Aug 2004 B1
6776165 Jin Aug 2004 B2
6780184 Tanrisever Aug 2004 B2
6783524 Anderson et al. Aug 2004 B2
6785593 Wang et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788018 Blumenkranz Sep 2004 B1
6792663 Krzyzanowski Sep 2004 B2
6793653 Sanchez et al. Sep 2004 B2
6799065 Niemeyer Sep 2004 B1
6799088 Wang et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801325 Farr et al. Oct 2004 B2
6804581 Wang et al. Oct 2004 B2
6810281 Brock et al. Oct 2004 B2
6817972 Snow Nov 2004 B2
6817974 Cooper et al. Nov 2004 B2
6817975 Farr et al. Nov 2004 B1
6820653 Schempf et al. Nov 2004 B1
6824508 Kim et al. Nov 2004 B2
6824510 Kim et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826977 Grover et al. Dec 2004 B2
6832988 Sproul Dec 2004 B2
6832996 Woloszko et al. Dec 2004 B2
6836703 Wang et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837846 Jaffe et al. Jan 2005 B2
6837883 Moll et al. Jan 2005 B2
6839612 Sanchez et al. Jan 2005 B2
6840938 Morley et al. Jan 2005 B1
6843793 Brock et al. Jan 2005 B2
6852107 Wang et al. Feb 2005 B2
6853879 Sunaoshi Feb 2005 B2
6858003 Evans et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860346 Burt et al. Mar 2005 B2
6860877 Sanchez et al. Mar 2005 B1
6866671 Tierney et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870343 Borenstein et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871117 Wang et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871563 Choset et al. Mar 2005 B2
6879880 Nowlin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6892112 Wang et al. May 2005 B2
6899705 Niemeyer May 2005 B2
6902560 Morley et al. Jun 2005 B1
6905460 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B2
6905491 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B1
6911916 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B1
6917176 Schempf et al. Jul 2005 B2
6933695 Blumenkranz Aug 2005 B2
6936001 Snow Aug 2005 B1
6936003 Iddan Aug 2005 B2
6936042 Wallace et al. Aug 2005 B2
6943663 Wang et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949096 Davison et al. Sep 2005 B2
6951535 Ghodoussi et al. Oct 2005 B2
6963792 Green Nov 2005 B1
6965812 Wang et al. Nov 2005 B2
6974411 Belson Dec 2005 B2
6974449 Niemeyer Dec 2005 B2
6979423 Moll Dec 2005 B2
6984203 Tartaglia et al. Jan 2006 B2
6984205 Gazdzinski Jan 2006 B2
6991627 Madhani et al. Jan 2006 B2
6993413 Sunaoshi Jan 2006 B2
6994703 Wang et al. Feb 2006 B2
6994708 Manzo Feb 2006 B2
6997908 Carrillo, Jr. et al. Feb 2006 B2
6999852 Green Feb 2006 B2
7025064 Wang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7027892 Wang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7033344 Imran Apr 2006 B2
7039453 Mullick et al. May 2006 B2
7042184 Oleynikov et al. May 2006 B2
7048745 Tierney et al. May 2006 B2
7053752 Wang et al. May 2006 B2
7063682 Whayne et al. Jun 2006 B1
7066879 Fowler et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066926 Wallace et al. Jun 2006 B2
7074179 Wang et al. Jul 2006 B2
7077446 Kameda et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083571 Wang et al. Aug 2006 B2
7083615 Peterson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087049 Nowlin et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090683 Brock et al. Aug 2006 B2
7097640 Wang et al. Aug 2006 B2
7105000 Mcbrayer Sep 2006 B2
7107090 Salisbury, Jr. et al. Sep 2006 B2
7109678 Kraus et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118582 Wang et al. Oct 2006 B1
7121781 Sanchez Oct 2006 B2
7125403 Julian et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126303 Farritor et al. Oct 2006 B2
7147650 Lee Dec 2006 B2
7155315 Niemeyer et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155316 Sutherland et al. Dec 2006 B2
7163525 Franer Jan 2007 B2
7169141 Brock et al. Jan 2007 B2
7182025 Ghorbel et al. Feb 2007 B2
7182089 Ries Feb 2007 B2
7199545 Oleynikov et al. Apr 2007 B2
7206626 Quaid, III Apr 2007 B2
7206627 Abovitz et al. Apr 2007 B2
7210364 Ghorbel et al. May 2007 B2
7214230 Brock et al. May 2007 B2
7217240 Snow May 2007 B2
7239940 Wang et al. Jul 2007 B2
7250028 Julian et al. Jul 2007 B2
7259652 Wang et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273488 Nakamura et al. Sep 2007 B2
7311107 Harel et al. Dec 2007 B2
7339341 Oleynikov et al. Mar 2008 B2
7372229 Farritor et al. May 2008 B2
7403836 Aoyama Jul 2008 B2
7438702 Hart et al. Oct 2008 B2
7447537 Funda et al. Nov 2008 B1
7492116 Oleynikov et al. Feb 2009 B2
7566300 Devierre et al. Jul 2009 B2
7574250 Niemeyer Aug 2009 B2
7637905 Saadat et al. Dec 2009 B2
7645230 Mikkaichi et al. Jan 2010 B2
7655004 Long Feb 2010 B2
7670329 Flaherty et al. Mar 2010 B2
7678043 Gilad Mar 2010 B2
7731727 Sauer Jun 2010 B2
7734375 Buehler et al. Jun 2010 B2
7762825 Burbank et al. Jul 2010 B2
7772796 Farritor et al. Aug 2010 B2
7785251 Wilk Aug 2010 B2
7785294 Hueil et al. Aug 2010 B2
7785333 Miyamoto et al. Aug 2010 B2
7789825 Nobis et al. Sep 2010 B2
7789861 Franer Sep 2010 B2
7794494 Sahatjian et al. Sep 2010 B2
7865266 Moll et al. Jan 2011 B2
7960935 Farritor et al. Jun 2011 B2
7979157 Anvari Jul 2011 B2
8021358 Doyle et al. Sep 2011 B2
8179073 Farritor et al. May 2012 B2
8231610 Jo et al. Jul 2012 B2
8343171 Farritor et al. Jan 2013 B2
8353897 Doyle et al. Jan 2013 B2
8377045 Schena Feb 2013 B2
8430851 Mcginley et al. Apr 2013 B2
8604742 Farritor et al. Dec 2013 B2
8636686 Minnelli et al. Jan 2014 B2
8679096 Farritor et al. Mar 2014 B2
8827337 Murata et al. Sep 2014 B2
8828024 Farritor et al. Sep 2014 B2
8834488 Farritor et al. Sep 2014 B2
8864652 Diolaiti et al. Oct 2014 B2
8888687 Ostrovsky et al. Nov 2014 B2
8968332 Farritor et al. Mar 2015 B2
8974440 Farritor et al. Mar 2015 B2
8986196 Larkin et al. Mar 2015 B2
9010214 Markvicka et al. Apr 2015 B2
9060781 Farritor et al. Jun 2015 B2
9089256 Tognaccini et al. Jul 2015 B2
9089353 Farritor et al. Jul 2015 B2
9138129 Diolaiti Sep 2015 B2
9198728 Wang et al. Dec 2015 B2
9516996 Diolaiti et al. Dec 2016 B2
9579088 Farritor et al. Feb 2017 B2
9649020 Finlay May 2017 B2
9717563 Tognaccini et al. Aug 2017 B2
9743987 Farritor et al. Aug 2017 B2
9757187 Farritor et al. Sep 2017 B2
9770305 Farritor et al. Sep 2017 B2
9789608 Itkowitz et al. Oct 2017 B2
9814640 Khaligh Nov 2017 B1
9816641 Bock-Aronson Nov 2017 B2
9849586 Rosheim Dec 2017 B2
9857786 Cristiano Jan 2018 B2
9888966 Farritor et al. Feb 2018 B2
9956043 Farritor et al. May 2018 B2
10008017 Itkowitz et al. Jun 2018 B2
10111711 Farritor et al. Oct 2018 B2
10137575 Itkowitz et al. Nov 2018 B2
10159533 Moll et al. Dec 2018 B2
10220522 Rockrohr Mar 2019 B2
10258425 Mustufa et al. Apr 2019 B2
10307199 Farritor et al. Jun 2019 B2
10342561 Farritor et al. Jul 2019 B2
10368952 Tognaccini et al. Aug 2019 B2
10398516 Jackson et al. Sep 2019 B2
10470828 Markvicka et al. Nov 2019 B2
10507066 Dimaio et al. Dec 2019 B2
10555775 Hoffman et al. Feb 2020 B2
10582973 Wilson et al. Mar 2020 B2
10695137 Farritor et al. Jun 2020 B2
10729503 Cameron Aug 2020 B2
10737394 Itkowitz et al. Aug 2020 B2
10751136 Farritor et al. Aug 2020 B2
10751883 Nahum Aug 2020 B2
10806538 Farritor et al. Oct 2020 B2
10966700 Farritor et al. Apr 2021 B2
11032125 Farritor et al. Jun 2021 B2
11298195 Ye et al. Apr 2022 B2
11382702 Tognaccini et al. Jul 2022 B2
11529201 Mondry et al. Dec 2022 B2
11595242 Farritor et al. Feb 2023 B2
20010018591 Brock et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010049497 Kalloo et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020003173 Bauer et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013601 Nobles et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020026186 Woloszko et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020038077 De La Torre et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020065507 Zadno-Azizi May 2002 A1
20020091374 Cooper Jul 2002 A1
20020103417 Gazdzinski Aug 2002 A1
20020111535 Kim et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120254 Julian et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128552 Nowlin et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140392 Borenstein et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147487 Sundquist et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020151906 Demarais et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156347 Kim et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020171385 Kim et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173700 Kim et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020190682 Schempf et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030020810 Takizawa et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030045888 Brock et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065250 Chiel et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030089267 Ghorbel et al. May 2003 A1
20030092964 Kim et al. May 2003 A1
20030097129 Davison et al. May 2003 A1
20030100817 Wang et al. May 2003 A1
20030109780 Coste-Maniere et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030114731 Cadeddu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135203 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139742 Wampler et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144656 Ocel et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030159535 Grover et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167000 Mullick et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030172871 Scherer Sep 2003 A1
20030179308 Zamorano et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030181788 Yokoi et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030225479 Waled Dec 2003 A1
20030229268 Uchiyama et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229338 Irion et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030230372 Schmidt Dec 2003 A1
20040024311 Quaid, III Feb 2004 A1
20040034282 Quaid, III Feb 2004 A1
20040034283 Quaid, III Feb 2004 A1
20040034302 Abovitz et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040050394 Jin Mar 2004 A1
20040070822 Takayama et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040099175 Perrot et al. May 2004 A1
20040102772 Baxter et al. May 2004 A1
20040106916 Quaid et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111113 Nakamura et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117032 Roth Jun 2004 A1
20040138525 Saadat et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138552 Harel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040140786 Borenstein Jul 2004 A1
20040153057 Davison Aug 2004 A1
20040173116 Ghorbel et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176664 Iddan Sep 2004 A1
20040215331 Chew et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225229 Viola Nov 2004 A1
20040254680 Sunaoshi Dec 2004 A1
20040267326 Ocel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050014994 Fowler et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021069 Feuer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050029978 Oleynikov et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043583 Killmann et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049462 Kanazawa Mar 2005 A1
20050054901 Yoshino Mar 2005 A1
20050054902 Konno Mar 2005 A1
20050064378 Toly Mar 2005 A1
20050065400 Banik et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070850 Albrecht Mar 2005 A1
20050083460 Hattori et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050095650 Julius et al. May 2005 A1
20050096502 Khalili May 2005 A1
20050143644 Gilad et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154376 Riviere et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165449 Cadeddu et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050177026 Hoeg et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050234294 Saadat et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234435 Layer Oct 2005 A1
20050272977 Saadat et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283137 Doyle et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288555 Binmoeller Dec 2005 A1
20050288665 Woloszko Dec 2005 A1
20060020272 Gildenberg Jan 2006 A1
20060046226 Bergler et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060079889 Scott Apr 2006 A1
20060100501 Berkelman et al. May 2006 A1
20060119304 Farritor et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149135 Paz Jul 2006 A1
20060152591 Lin Jul 2006 A1
20060155263 Lipow Jul 2006 A1
20060189845 Maahs et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195015 Mullick et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060196301 Oleynikov et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060198619 Oleynikov et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060241570 Wilk Oct 2006 A1
20060241732 Denker et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060253109 Chu Nov 2006 A1
20060258938 Hoffman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060258954 Timberlake et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060261770 Kishi et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070032701 Fowler et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043397 Ocel et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070055342 Wu et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070080658 Farritor et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088277 Mcginley et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088340 Brock et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106113 Ravo May 2007 A1
20070106317 Shelton et al. May 2007 A1
20070123748 Meglan May 2007 A1
20070135803 Belson Jun 2007 A1
20070142725 Hardin et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156019 Larkin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156211 Wood et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167955 Arnault De La Menardiere et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070225633 Wood et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225634 Wood et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070241714 Okeynikov et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244520 Ferren et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250064 Darois et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255273 Fernandez et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070287884 Schena Dec 2007 A1
20080004634 Farritor et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015565 Davison Jan 2008 A1
20080015566 Livneh Jan 2008 A1
20080021440 Solomon Jan 2008 A1
20080033569 Ferren et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045803 Williams et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058835 Farritor et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080058989 Oleynikov et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071289 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071290 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080103440 Ferren et al. May 2008 A1
20080109014 De La Pena May 2008 A1
20080111513 Farritor et al. May 2008 A1
20080119870 Williams May 2008 A1
20080132890 Woloszko et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161804 Rioux et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080164079 Jacobsen Jul 2008 A1
20080168639 Otake et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183033 Bern et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080221591 Farritor et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080269557 Marescaux et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269562 Marescaux et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090002414 Shibata et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090012532 Blackwell et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090020724 Paffrath Jan 2009 A1
20090024142 Ruiz Morales Jan 2009 A1
20090048612 Farritor et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090054909 Farritor et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090069821 Farritor et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076536 Rentschler et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090137952 Ramamurthy et al. May 2009 A1
20090143787 De La Pena Jun 2009 A9
20090163929 Yeung et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090171373 Farritor et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192524 Itkowitz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090234369 Bax et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090236400 Cole et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090240246 Deville et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090247821 Rogers Oct 2009 A1
20090248038 Blumenkranz et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090281377 Acosta et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090299143 Conlon et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090305210 Guru et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326322 Diolaiti Dec 2009 A1
20100010294 Conlon et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016659 Weitzner Jan 2010 A1
20100016853 Burbank Jan 2010 A1
20100042097 Newton et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100056863 Dejima et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069710 Yamatani et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069940 Miller et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100081875 Fowler et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100101346 Johnson et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100130986 Mailloux et al. May 2010 A1
20100139436 Kawashima et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100185212 Sholev Jul 2010 A1
20100198231 Scott Aug 2010 A1
20100204713 Ruiz Morales Aug 2010 A1
20100245549 Allen et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250000 Blumenkranz et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100026347 Bannasch et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262162 Omori Oct 2010 A1
20100263470 Bannasch et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274079 Kim et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100292691 Brogna Nov 2010 A1
20100301095 Shelton, IV et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318059 Farritor et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331856 Carlson et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110015569 Kirschenman et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110020779 Hannaford et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110071347 Rogers et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071544 Steger et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110075693 Kuramochi et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110077478 Freeman et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082365 Mcgrogan et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098529 Ostrovsky et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110107866 Oka et al. May 2011 A1
20110152615 Schostek et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110224605 Farritor et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230894 Simaan et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110237890 Farritor et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238079 Hannaford et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238080 Ranjit et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110264078 Lipow et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270443 Kamiya et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276046 Heimbecher et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120016175 Roberts et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029727 Malik Feb 2012 A1
20120035582 Nelson et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059392 Diolaiti Mar 2012 A1
20120078053 Phee et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120109150 Blackwell et al. May 2012 A1
20120116362 Kieturakis May 2012 A1
20120179168 Farritor et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120221147 Goldberg et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120253515 Coste-Maniere et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130001970 Suyama et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130041360 Farritor et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130055560 Nakasugi et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130125696 Long May 2013 A1
20130131695 Scarfogliero et al. May 2013 A1
20130178867 Farritor et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130282023 Burbank et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130304084 Beira et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325030 Hourtash et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325181 Moore Dec 2013 A1
20130345717 Markvicka et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130345718 Crawford et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140039515 Mondry et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140046340 Wilson et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140055489 Itkowitz et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058205 Frederick et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140100587 Farritor et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140137687 Nogami et al. May 2014 A1
20140221749 Grant et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140232824 Dimaio et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140276944 Farritor et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140303434 Farritor et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140371762 Farritor et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150051446 Farritor et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150057537 Dillon et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150157191 Phee et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150223896 Farritor et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150297299 Yeung et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160066999 Forgione et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160135898 Frederick et al. May 2016 A1
20160291571 Cristiano Oct 2016 A1
20160303745 Rockrohr Oct 2016 A1
20170014197 McCrea et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170035526 Farritor et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170078583 Haggerty et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170252096 Felder et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170354470 Farritor et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180132956 Cameron May 2018 A1
20180153578 Cooper et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180338777 Bonadio et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190059983 Germain et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190090965 Farritor et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190209262 Mustufa et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190327394 Ramirez Luna et al. Oct 2019 A1
20200138534 Garcia Kilroy et al. May 2020 A1
20200214775 Farritor et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200330175 Cameron Oct 2020 A1
20200368915 Itkowitz et al. Nov 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (92)
Number Date Country
2918531 Jan 2015 CA
102499759 Jun 2012 CN
102821918 Dec 2012 CN
104523309 Apr 2015 CN
104582600 Apr 2015 CN
104622528 May 2015 CN
204337044 May 2015 CN
105025826 Nov 2015 CN
102010040405 Mar 2012 DE
105656 Apr 1984 EP
279591 Aug 1988 EP
1354670 Oct 2003 EP
2286756 Feb 2011 EP
2329787 Jun 2011 EP
2563261 Mar 2013 EP
2684528 Jan 2014 EP
2123225 Dec 2014 EP
2815705 Dec 2014 EP
2881046 Jun 2015 EP
2937047 Oct 2015 EP
S59059371 Apr 1984 JP
S61165061 Jul 1986 JP
S62068293 Mar 1987 JP
H04144533 May 1992 JP
H05115425 May 1993 JP
H06507809 Sep 1994 JP
H06508049 Sep 1994 JP
H07016235 Jan 1995 JP
H07136173 May 1995 JP
H07306155 Nov 1995 JP
H08224248 Sep 1996 JP
2001505810 May 2001 JP
2002000524 Jan 2002 JP
2003220065 Aug 2003 JP
2004180781 Jul 2004 JP
2004283940 Oct 2004 JP
2004322310 Nov 2004 JP
2004329292 Nov 2004 JP
2009106606 May 2009 JP
2009297809 Dec 2009 JP
2010533045 Oct 2010 JP
2010536436 Dec 2010 JP
2011504794 Feb 2011 JP
2011045500 Mar 2011 JP
2011115591 Jun 2011 JP
2012504017 Feb 2012 JP
2012176489 Sep 2012 JP
5418704 Feb 2014 JP
2015526171 Sep 2015 JP
6959371 Aug 2016 JP
2016213937 Dec 2016 JP
2017113837 Jun 2017 JP
9221291 Dec 1992 WO
0189405 Nov 2001 WO
02082979 Oct 2002 WO
02100256 Dec 2002 WO
2005009211 Feb 2005 WO
2005044095 May 2005 WO
2006005075 Jan 2006 WO
2006052927 May 2006 WO
2006079108 Jul 2006 WO
2007011654 Jan 2007 WO
2007111571 Oct 2007 WO
2007149559 Dec 2007 WO
2009014917 Jan 2009 WO
2009023851 Feb 2009 WO
2009144729 Dec 2009 WO
2009158164 Dec 2009 WO
2010039394 Apr 2010 WO
2010042611 Apr 2010 WO
2010046823 Apr 2010 WO
2010050771 May 2010 WO
2010083480 Jul 2010 WO
2011075693 Jun 2011 WO
2011118646 Sep 2011 WO
2011135503 Nov 2011 WO
2011163520 Dec 2011 WO
2013009887 Jan 2013 WO
2013052137 Apr 2013 WO
2013106569 Jul 2013 WO
2014011238 Jan 2014 WO
2014025399 Feb 2014 WO
2014144220 Sep 2014 WO
2014146090 Sep 2014 WO
2015009949 Jan 2015 WO
2015031777 Mar 2015 WO
2015088655 Jun 2015 WO
2016077478 May 2016 WO
2017024081 Feb 2017 WO
2017064303 Apr 2017 WO
2017201310 Nov 2017 WO
2018045036 Mar 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (158)
Entry
Lou Cubrich, “A Four-DOF Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site Platform for Rapidly-Developing Next-Generation Surgical Robotics”, Journal of Medical Robotics Research, vol. 1, No. 4, 2016, 165006-1-165006-15.
Abbou et al., “Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot,” The Journal of Urology, Jun. 2001; 165: 1964-1966.
Abbott et al., “Design of an Endoluminal NOTES Robotic System,” Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robot Systems, San Diego, CA, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007: 410-416.
Albers et al., Design and development process of a humanoid robot upper body through experimentation, 2004, IEEE, p. 77-92 (Year: 2004).
Allendorf et al., “Postoperative Immune Function Varies Inversely with the Degree of Surgical Trauma in a Murine Model,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1997; 11: 427-430.
Ang, “Active Tremor Compensation in Handheld Instrument for Microsurgery,” Doctoral dissertation, tech report CMU-RI-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, May 2004, 150 pp.
Atmel 80C5X2 Core, http://www.atmel.com, 2006, 186 pp.
Bailey et al., “Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Quality Medical Publishers, Inc., 1995; 25 pp.
Ballantyne, “Robotic Surgery, Telerobotic Surgery, Telepresence, and Telementoring,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2002; 16: 1389-1402.
Bauer et al., “Case Report: Remote Percutaneous Renal Access Using a New Automated Telesurgical Robotic System,” Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2001; (4): 341-347.
Begos et al., “Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: From Gimmick to Gold Standard,” J Clin Gastroenterol, 1994; 19(4): 325-330.
Berg et al., “Surgery with Cooperative Robots,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007; 1 pg.
Breda et al., “Future developments and perspectives in laparoscopy,” Eur. Urology 2001: 40(1): 84-91.
Breedveld et al., “Design of Steerable Endoscopes to Improve the Visual Perception of Depth During Laparoscopic Surgery,” ASME, Jan. 2004; 126: 1-5.
Breedveld et al., “Locomotion through the Intestine by means of Rolling Stents,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2004.
Calafiore et al., “Multiple Arterial Conduits Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Early Angiographic Results,” Ann Thorac Surg, 1999; 67: 450-456.
Camarillo et al., “Robotic Technology in Surgery: Past, Present, and Future,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2004; 188: 2S-15.
Cavusoglu et al., “Telesurgery and Surgical Simulation: Haptic Interfaces to Real and Virtual Surgical Environments,” In McLaughlin, M. L., Hespanha, J. P., and Sukhatme, G., editors. Touch in virtual environments, IMSC Series in Multimedia 2001; 28 pp.
Cavusoglu et al., “Robotics for Telesurgery: Second Generation BerkeleyIUCSF Laparoscopic Telesurgical Workstation and Looking Towards the Future Applications,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2003; 30(1): 22-29.
Chanthasopeephan et al. (2003), “Measuring Forces in Liver Cutting: New Equipment and Experimental Results,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31: 1372-1382.
Choi et al., “Flexure-based Manipulator for Active Handheld Microsurgical Instrument,” Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), Sep. 2005.
Cleary et al., “State of the Art in Surgical Robotics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges”, “Computer Aided Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 312-328, vol. 6.
Crystal Eyes, http://www.reald.com, 2007 (Stereo 3D visualization for CAVEs, theaters and immersive environments), 1 pg.
Cuschieri, “Technology for Minimal Access Surgery,” BMJ, 1999; 319: 1-6.
Dakin et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems,” Surg Endosc., 2003; 17: 574-579.
Definition of Individually. Dictionary.com, retrieved on Aug. 9, 2016; Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/individually>, 1 page.
Dumpert et al., “Improving In Vivo Robot Vision Quality,” in the Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Long Beach, CA, Jan. 26-29, 2005.
Dumpert et al., “Stereoscopic In Vivo Surgical Robots,” IEEE Sensors Special Issue on In Vivo Sensors for Medicine, Jan. 2007, 10 pp.
Falcone et al., “Robotic Surgery,” Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003; 46(1): 37-43.
Faraz et al., “Engineering Approaches to Mechanical and Robotic Design for Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS),” Kluwer Academic Publishers (Boston), 2000, 13 pp.
Fearing et al., “Wing Transmission for a Micromechanical Flying Insect,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Apr. 2000: 1509-1516.
Fireman et al., “Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's disease with wireless capsule endoscopy,” Gut 2003; 52:390-392.
Flynn et al., “Tomorrow's Surgery; Micro-motors and Microrobots for Minimally Invasive Procedures,” Minimally Invasive Surgery & Allied Technologies, 1998, 7(4): pp. 343-352.
Franklin et al., “Prospective Comparison of Open vs. Laparoscopic Colon Surgery for Carcinoma: Five-Year Results,” Dis Colon Rectum, 1996; 39: S35-S46.
Franzino, “The Laprotek Surgical System and the Next Generation of Robotics,” Surg. Clin. North Am, 2003; 83(6): 1317-1320.
Fraulob et al., “Miniature assistance module for robot-assisted heart surgery,” Biomed. Tech. 2002; 47 Suppl. 1, Pt. 1: 12-5.
Fukuda et al., “Mechanism and Swimming Experiment of Micro Mobile Robot in Water,” Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994; 814-819.
Fukuda et al., “Micro Active Catheter System with Multi Degrees of Freedom,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1994: 2290-2295.
Fuller et al., “Laparoscopic Trocar Injuries: A Report from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical Products (STAMP) Committee,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, available at http://www.fda.gov, Finalized: Nov. 7, 2003; Updated: Jun. 24, 2005, 11 pp.
Glukhovsky et al., “The development and application of wireless capsule endoscopy,” Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surgery, 2004; 1(1): 114-123.
Gong et al., “Wireless endoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 51 (6): 725-729.
Gopura et al., Mechanical designs of active upper-limb exoskeleton robots: State-of-the-art and design difficulties, 2009, IEEE, p. 178-187 (Year: 2009).
Gopura et al., A brief review on upper extremity robotic exoskeleton systems, 2011, IEEE, p. 346-351 (Year: 2011).
Grady, “Doctors Try New Surgery for Gallbladder Removal,” The New York Times, Apr. 20, 2007; 3pp.
Green, “Telepresence Surgery”, Jan. 1, 1995, Publisher: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.
Guber et al., “Miniaturized Instrument Systems for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Therapy,” Biomedizinische Technic, 2002; Band 47, Erganmngsband 1: 198-201.
Guo et al., “Micro Active Guide Wire Catheter System—Characteristic Evaluation, Electrical Model* and Operability Evaluation of Micro Active Catheter,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1996; 2226-2231.
Guo et al., “Fish-like Underwater Microrobot with 3 DOF,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002; 738-743.
Hanly et al., “Robotic Abdominal Surgery,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2004; 188 (Suppl. to Oct. 1994); 19S-26S.
Hanly et al., “Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2004; 19(4): 477-483.
Heikkinen et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication two years after operation: A prospective randomized trial,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14:1019-1023.
Rentschler et al., “Toward In Vivo Mobility,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Long Beach, CA, 2005a, III: 397-403.
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Robots Can Assist in Abdominal Exploration,” from the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005b.
Rentschler et al., “Modeling, Analysis, and Experimental Study of In Vivo Wheeled Robotic Mobility,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22 (2): 308-321, 2005c.
Rentschler et al., “Miniature in vivo robots for remote and harsh environments,” IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Jan. 2006; 12(1): pp. 66-75.
Rentschler et al., “Mechanical Design of Robotic In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006a; pp. 1-11, Accepted.
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Sole Visual Feedback for Abdominal Exploration and Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 20-1: 135-138, 2006b.
Rentschler et al., “Natural Orifice Surgery with an Endoluminal Mobile Robot,” The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Dallas, TX, Apr. 2006d.
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Biopsy and Camera Robot,” Studies in Health and Infonnatics Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, vol. 119: 449-454, IOS Press, Long Beach, CA, 2006e.
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Biopsy Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida, May 2006; 4155-4160.
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Robotics during the NEEMO 9 Mission,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007; 1 pg.
Rentschler et al., “An In Vivo Mobile Robot for Surgical Vision and Task Assistance,” Journal of Medical Devices, Mar. 2007; vol. 1: 23-29.
Riviere et al., “Toward Active Tremor Canceling in Handheld Microsurgical Instruments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Oct. 2003, 19(5): 793-800.
Rosen et al., “Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic, Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery-Experimental Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, Oct. 1999; 46(10): 1212-1221.
Rosen et al., “Task Decomposition of Laparoscopic Surgery for Objective Evaluation of Surgical Residents' Learning Curve Using Hidden Markov Model,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 7, pp. 49-61, 2002.
Rosen et al., “The Blue DRAGON—A System of Measuring the Kinematics and the Dynamics of Minimally Invasive Surgical Tools In-Vivo,” Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 1876-1881, May 2002.
Rosen et al., Objective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills Based on Haptic Information and Tool/Tissue Interactions, Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 7, Issue 1, pp. 49-61, Jul. 2002.
Rosen et al., “Spherical Mechanism Analysis of a Surgical Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Analytical and Experimental Approaches,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics-Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 442-448, Jan. 2005.
Ruurda et al., “Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):41-45.
Ruurda et al, “Robot-Assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery,” Ann R. Coll Surg Engl. 2002; 84: 223-226.
Sackier et al., “Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1994; 8:63-6.
Salky, “What is the Penetration of Endoscopic Techniques into Surgical Practice?” Digestive Surgery 2000; 17:422-426.
Satava, “Surgical Robotics: The Early Chronicles,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):6-16.
Schippers et al. (1996), “Requirements and Possibilities of Computer-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery,” In: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, pp. 561-565.
Schurr et al., “Robotics and Telemanipulation Technologies for Endoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14:375-381.
Schwartz, “In the Lab: Robots that Slink and Squirm,” The New York Times, Mar. 27, 2007, 4 pp.
Sharp LL-151-3D, http://www.sharp3d.com, 2006, 2 pp.
Slatkin et al., “The Development of a Robotic Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 162-171, 1995.
Smart Pill “Fastastic Voyage: Smart Pill to Expand Testing,” http://www.smartpilldiagnostics.com, Apr. 13, 2005, 1 pg.
Sodeyama et al., A shoulder structure of muscle-driven humanoid with shoulder blades, 2005, IEEE, p. 1-6 (Year: 2005).
Southern Surgeons Club (1991), “A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies,” N. Eng. 1 Med. 324 (16): 1073-1078.
Stefanini et al., “Modeling and Experiments on a Legged Microrobot Locomoting in a Tubular Compliant and Slippery Environment,” Int. Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 25, No. 5-6, pp. 551-560, May-Jun. 2006.
Stiff et al., “Long-term Pain: Less Common After Laparoscopic than Open Cholecystectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, 1994; 81: 1368-1370.
Stoianovici et al., “Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 1-17.
Strong et al., “Efficacy of Novel Robotic Camera vs. a Standard Laproscopic Camera,” Surgical Innovation vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. 2005, Westminster Publications, Inc., pp. 315-318.
Suzumori et al., “Development of Flexible Microactuator and its Applications to Robotics Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991: 1622-1627.
Taylor et al., “A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE Eng Med Biol, 1995; 279-87.
Tendick et al. (1993), “Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation,” Presence 2(1): 66-81.
Tendick et al., “Applications of Micromechatronics in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1998; 3(1): 34-42.
Thomann et al., “The Design of a new type of Micro Robot for the Intestinal Inspection,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002: 1385-1390.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/180,960 filed Feb. 2000.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/956,032, filed Aug. 15, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/983,445, filed Oct. 29, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,062, filed Nov. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,076, filed Nov. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,086, filed Nov. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,106, filed Nov. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,470, filed Nov. 27, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/025,346, filed Feb. 1, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,588, filed Feb. 22, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,617, filed Feb. 22, 2008.
Hissink, “Olympus Medical develops capsule camera technology,” Dec. 2004, accessed Aug. 29, 2007, http://www.letsgodigital.org, 3 pp.
Horgan et al., “Technical Report: Robots in Laparoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2001; 11(6): 415-419.
Ishiyama et al., “Spiral-type Micro-machine for Medical Applications,” 2000 International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, 2000; 65-69.
Jagannath et al., “Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61 (3): 449-453.
Kalloo et al., “Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004; 60(1): 114-117.
Kang et al., “Robotic Assistants Aid Surgeons During Minimally Invasive Procedures,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jan.-Feb. 2001: 94-104.
Kantsevoy et al., “Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2006; 20: 522-525.
Kantsevoy et al., “Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 62(2): 287-292.
Kazemier et al. (1998), “Vascular Injuries During Laparoscopy,” J. Am. Coli. Surg. 186(5): 604-5.
Keller et al., Design of the pediatric arm rehabilitation robot ChARMin, 2014, IEEE, p. 530-535 (Year: 2014).
Kim, “Early Experience with Telemanipulative Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using da Vinci,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1): 33-40.
Ko et al., “Per-Oral transgastric abdominal surgery,” Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2006; 7: 67-70.
Lafullarde et al., “Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Five-year Results and Beyond,” Arch/Surg, Feb. 2001; 136: 180-184.
Leggett et al. (2002), “Aortic injury during laparoscopic Fundoplication,” Surg. Endoscopy 16(2): 362.
Li et al. (2000), “Microvascular Anastomoses Performed in Rats Using a Microsurgical Telemanipulator,” Comp. Aid. Surg., 5: 326-332.
Liem et al., “Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-hernia Repair,” New England Journal of Medicine, 1997; 336 (22):1541-1547.
Macfarlane et al., “Force-Feedback Grasper Helps Restore the Sense of Touch in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1999; 3: 278-285.
Mack et al., “Present Role of Thoracoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of the Chest,” Ann Thorac Surgery, 1992; 54: 403-409.
Mack, “Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery,” JAMA, Feb. 2001; 285(5): 568-572.
Mei et al., “Wireless Drive and Control of a Swimming Microrobot,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 1131-1136.
Menciassi et al., “Robotic Solutions and Mechanisms for a Semi-Autonomous Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002; 1379-1384.
Melvin et al., “Computer-Enhanced vs. Standard Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery,” J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 11-16.
Menciassi et al., “Locomotion of a Leffed Capsule in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Theoretical Study and Preliminary Technological Results,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, San Francisco, CA, pp. 2767-2770, Sep. 2004.
Menciassi et al., “Shape memory alloy clamping devices of a capsule for monitoring tasks in the gastrointestinal tract,” J. Micromech. Microeng, 2005; 15: 2045-2055.
Meron, “The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 52 6: 817-819.
Micron, http://www.micron.com, 2006, 1/4-inch VGA NTSC/PAL CMOS Digital Image Sensor, 98 pp.
Midday Jeff et al., “Material Handling System for Robotic natural Orifice Surgery,”, Proceedings of the 2011 Design of medical Devices Conference, Apr. 12-14, 2011, Minneapolis, MN 4 pages.
Miller, Ph.D., et al., “In-Vivo Stereoscopic Imaging System with 5 Degrees-of-Freedom for Minimal Access Surgery,” Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, 7 pp., 2004.
Munro (2002), “Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques,” Curro Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 14 (4): 365-74.
Nio et al., “Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks,” Surg Endosc, 2002; 16: 412-415.
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Improved Vision for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), Chicago, IL, Jun. 23-26, 2004b.
Oleynikov et al., “Miniature Robots Can Assist in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 19-4: 473-476, 2005.
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Robotic Laparoscopy,” Surgical Innovation, Jun. 2005, 12(2): 177-181.
O'Neill, “Surgeon takes new route to gallbladder,” The Oregonian, Jun. 2007; 2 pp.
Orlando et al. (2003), “Needle and Trocar Injuries in Diagnostic Laparoscopy under Local Anesthesia: What Is the True Incidence of These Complications?” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 13(3): 181-184.
Palm. William. “Rapid Prototyping Primer” May 1998 (revised Jul. 30, 2002) (http://www.me.psu.edu/lamancusa/rapidpro/primer/chapter2.htm), 12 pages.
Park et al., “Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61 (4): 601-606.
Park et al., “Trocar-less Instrumentation for Laparoscopy: Magnetic Positioning of Intra-abdominal Camera and Retractor,” Ann Surg, Mar. 2007; 245(3): 379-384.
Patronik et al., “Crawling on the Heart: A Mobile Robotic Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Interventions,” MICCAI, 2004, pp. 9-16.
Patronik et al., “Development of a Tethered Epicardial Crawler for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Therapies,” IEEE, pp. 239-240, 2004.
Patronik et al., “Preliminary evaluation of a mobile robotic device for navigation and intervention on the beating heart,” Computer Aided Surgery, 10(4): 225-232, Jul. 2005.
Peirs et al., “A miniature manipulator for integration in a self-propelling endoscope,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2001, 92: 343-349.
Peters, “Minimally Invasive Colectomy: Are the Potential Benefits Realized?” Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 751-756.
Phee et al., “Development of Microrobotic Devices for Locomotion in the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CI RAS 2001), Nov. 28-30, (2001), Singapore, 6 pages.
Phee et al., “Analysis and Development of Locomotion Devices for the Gastrointestinal Tract,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 6, Jun. 2002: 613-616.
Platt et al., “In Vivo Robotic Cameras can Enhance Imaging Capability During Laparoscopic Surgery,” from the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005; 1 pg.
Qian Huan et al., “Multi-joint Single-wound Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery Robot Design,” Mechanical Design and Manufacturing, May 8, 2014, pp. 134-137.
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Mobile Surgical Robotic Task Assistance,” 1 pg.
Rentschler et al., “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 28th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004; pp. 1-9.
Rentschler et al., “In Vivo Robots for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Newport Beach, CA, 2004a, 98: 316-322.
Worn et al., “Espirit Project No. 33915: Miniaturised Robot for Micro Manipulation (MINIMAN),” Nov. 1998, http://www.ipr.ira.ujka.de/-microbot/miniman.
Way et al., editors, “Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1995; 14 pp.
Wolfe et al. (1991), Endoscopic Cholecystectomy: An analysis of Complications, Arch. Surg. 1991; 126: 1192-1196.
Xu et al., “System Design of an Insertable Robotic Effector Platform for Single Access (SPA) Surgery”, The 2009 IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 11-15, 2009, St. Louis MO USA pp. 5546-5552.
Lehman et al., Dexterous miniature in vivo robot for NOTES, 2009, IEEE, p. 244-249.
Mihelj et al., ARMin II—7 DoF rehabilitation robot: mechanics and kinematics, 2007, IEEE, p. 4120-4125.
Zhang et al., Cooperative robotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery: CoBRASurge, 2009, IEEE, p. 5540-5545.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230083757 A1 Mar 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62614127 Jan 2018 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 17236489 Apr 2021 US
Child 17980665 US
Parent 16241263 Jan 2019 US
Child 17236489 US