1. Technical Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to the field of integrated circuit and, more particularly, to fusible link programming in semiconductor integrated circuits.
2. Description of Related Art
In integrated circuits including CMOS integrated circuits, it is often desirable to be able to permanently store information, or to form permanent connections of the integrated circuit after it is manufactured. Fuse or anti-fuse devices forming fusible links are frequently used for this purpose. Fuses and anti-fuses can also be used to program redundant elements to replace identical defective elements such as DRAM, Flash EEPROM, SRAM, or other memories. Further, fuses can be used to store die identification or other such information, or to adjust the speed of a circuit by adjusting the resistance of the current path.
One type of fuse device is “programmed” or “blown” using a laser to open a link after a semiconductor device is processed and passivated. This type of fuse device requires precise alignment of the laser on the fuse device to avoid destroying neighboring devices. This and other similar approaches can result in damage to the device passivation layer, and thus, lead to reliability concerns. For example, the process of programming the fuse can cause a hole in the passivation layer when the fuse material is displaced. Also the method is not in-system, sometimes inconvenient, and thus lead to higher test cost.
Another type of fuse device is the electrical fuse/anti-fuse. Electrical fuse/anti-fuses have been introduced into semiconductor products and are, in many applications, replacing the commonly used laser fuses. The typical electrical fuse/anti-fuse is in-system but is one-time programmable. It is generally a passive element such as resistor or capacitor which is programmed or blown using electrical pulses via a programming (pass gate) transistor. Since significant energy or high programming current is required to pass through these devices to reach the passive element, the size required for the programming (pass gate) transistors can be very large.
For example, a currently used anti-fuse device is structured based on a conventional MOS transistor. Such an anti-fuse is programmed by applying a voltage (generally about 7 Volts) across the gate-oxide of the MOS transistor. The programming process results in a damaged gate-oxide which reduces the electrical resistance across the oxide. A sensing circuit attached to the anti-fuse is used to differentiate between the high resistance of the intact oxide and the lowered resistance of the damaged oxide. For lower resistances and more reliable sensing, even higher programming voltages and programming currents are used.
Because of the significant energy required for programming, damage can result to surrounding structure and/or unreliable sensing can result because of the inconsistent nature of the blow process and the relatively small change typically offered in the programmed resistance. Further, these type of devices may not be viable for use with many of the latest process technologies because of the required programming potentials, i.e. high current flow and high voltage levels over a requisite amount of time. It would be advantageous to lower the programming parameters in order to enable reduction of the size of the associated circuits (e.g. voltage generator, programming transistor, wiring, etc.) and/or improve the sensing reliability.
The present invention achieves technical advantages as an electrically programmable transistor fuse having a source and drain disposed in a semiconductor substrate and further having a double-gate arrangement disposed in a single layer of polysilicon in which one gate is capacitively coupled to the drain region. The transistor further includes a coupling device adapted to increase the capacitive coupling of the one gate and the drain region for enabling reduction in fuse programming voltage, wherein programming of the transistor fuse is effectuated via application of a voltage signal to the drain in which the voltage signal is less than the junction breakdown of the transistor fuse.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with particular reference to the presently preferred exemplary embodiments. However, it should be understood that this class of embodiments provides only a few examples of the many advantageous uses and innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present application do not necessarily delimit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features, but not to others. Throughout the drawings, it is noted that the same reference numerals or letters will be used to designate like or equivalent elements having the same function. Detailed Descriptions of known functions and constructions unnecessarily obscuring the subject matter of the present invention have been omitted for clarity.
Current electrical fuses are passive elements, such as resistors or capacitors, which are programmed by electrical pulses with typical programming currents in the order of milli-amp (mA) or transistor fuses having programming voltage greater than the junction breakdown of the transistor. In accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a single polysilicon 2-transistor EEPROM type transistor advantageously realized in a self-aligned CMOS process is described and used as a fuse element. The programming current required to program a 2-transistor EEPROM type device is in the order of few micro-amp (μA), a three order of magnitude reduction over typical electric type fuses. However, conventional EEPROM devices are not CMOS compatible and have high programming potentials.
Conventional split-gate EEPROM structures are formed using at least two layers of polycrystalline silicon and include a floating gate transistor as shown in
Although this conventional floating gate structure works well for many memory devices, it deviates from the conventional (single poly) CMOS process; thus requiring additional process steps as well as increasing process complicity in deposit and removal of the floating gate poly in a small density area among a large processor chip. Also, the floating gate poly presents added equipment costs to maintain compatibility among logic Fabs, for the conventional logic CMOS Fab is equipped with single poly process.
Referring now to
Referring now to
In operation, biasing of the eFuse is achieved through capacitive coupling. That is, the floating gate 215 is independently biased via capacitive coupling with the drain 211 and isolated well 220. The floating gate 215 is charged using programming known as Channel Hot Electron programming. In particular (as is illustrated in
During the Read mode of operation, with the biasing conditions established as described in the table of
In contrast, when the floating gate 215 has not been programmed, Vref is enough to turn on the isolation transistor 11 and the floating gate 12 transistor and current will flow from the source 210 to the bit line (i.e., drain 211). Current flow detection can then be used to determine the programming state.
To erase or reprogram, a negative programming voltage (in this example −5V) is applied to the control gate 216 and hence electrons are channeled away from the floating gate 215.
In another embodiment, illustrated in
Referring now to
Although a preferred embodiment of the method and system of the present invention has been illustrated in the accompanied drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it is understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth and defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4035820 | Matzen | Jul 1977 | A |
4361847 | Harari | Nov 1982 | A |
4459608 | Giebel et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4845538 | Hazani | Jul 1989 | A |
5029130 | Yeh | Jul 1991 | A |
5247346 | Hazani | Sep 1993 | A |
5436479 | Devin | Jul 1995 | A |
5440159 | Larsen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5633186 | Shum et al. | May 1997 | A |
5835409 | Lambertson | Nov 1998 | A |
5844271 | Sethi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856223 | Wang | Jan 1999 | A |
5872732 | Wong | Feb 1999 | A |
5886378 | Wang | Mar 1999 | A |
5986941 | Pang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6100746 | Wu | Aug 2000 | A |
6177703 | Cunningham | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6313500 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6392468 | Wu | May 2002 | B1 |
6573557 | Watanabe | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6617637 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627947 | Hu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6653183 | Hung et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653682 | Houdt et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6690057 | Frerichs | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6822286 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6842374 | Lee et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20030119258 | Pascucci | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 847 091 | Jun 1998 | EP |
1 096 572 | May 2001 | EP |
2 165 410 | Apr 1986 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050167728 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |