Solar blind ultra violet (UV) detector and fabrication methods of the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9337220
  • Patent Number
    9,337,220
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 6, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 10, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
Described herein is device configured to be a solar-blind UV detector comprising a substrate; a plurality of pixels; a plurality of nanowires in each of the plurality of pixel, wherein the plurality of nanowires extend essentially perpendicularly from the substrate.
Description
BACKGROUND

The ozone layer of the Earth atmosphere strongly absorbs ultra violet (UV) radiations in the 300 nm to 200 nm wavelength region. Therefore, below the ozone layer, which is mainly located in the lower portion of the stratosphere from approximately 13 to 40 kilometres above Earth surface, UV radiations from the sun in the 300 nm to 200 nm wavelength region are essentially absent.


To be able to reject the visible wavelengths and to detect the solar blind UV (SBUV) light, wide band-gap materials such as AlGaN, SiC, ZnO have often been used in SBUV detectors. All of these materials are difficult to grow, not compatible with conventional semiconductor processing, and are difficult for integrate with silicon-based readout electronics.


On the other hand, to increase sensitivity of an SBUV detector, an avalanche multiplication is often implemented by using the avalanche photodiode (APD) structure. For most of direct band-gap compound materials, however, multiplication noise also increases at the same rate as the avalanche gain due to the almost unity ratio of the hole to electron impact ionization coefficients.


An APD is a highly sensitive semiconductor electronic device that exploits the photoelectric effect to convert light to electricity. APDs can be thought of as photodetectors that provide a built-in first stage of gain through avalanche breakdown. By applying a high reverse bias voltage (typically 100-200 V in silicon), APDs show an internal current gain (around 100). Avalanche breakdown is a phenomenon that can occur in both insulating and semiconducting materials. It is a form of electric current multiplication that can allow very large currents to flow within materials which are otherwise good insulators. It is a type of electron avalanche. The avalanche process occurs when the carriers in the transition region are accelerated by the electric field to energies sufficient to free electron-hole pairs via collisions with bond electrons.


SUMMARY

According to an embodiment, a device comprises a substrate; a plurality of pixels; a plurality of nanowires in each of the plurality of pixel, wherein the plurality of nanowires extend essentially perpendicularly from the substrate, wherein the plurality of nanowires extend essentially perpendicularly from the substrate, and the device is configured to be a solar-blind UV detector to detect UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region.


According to an embodiment, the plurality of nanowires are configured to react only to radiations in the solar-blind UV region.


According to an embodiment, each of the plurality of nanowires comprises a core and a cladding surrounding the core, wherein the core has a higher refractive index than the cladding.


According to an embodiment, each of the plurality of the nanowires comprises a coupler disposed on an end of each of the nanowire away from the substrate, the coupler being functional to guide radiation into the nanowires.


According to an embodiment, the nanowires have a diameter from about 5 nm to about 30 nm, a height from about 0.1 μm to about 5 μm; the cladding has a thickness of about 10 nm to about 200 nm. According to an embodiment, the nanowires have a diameter from about 5 nm to about 150 nm.


According to an embodiment, the nanowires have a pitch from about 0.2 μm to about 2 μm.


According to an embodiment, the nanowires detect UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region by converting UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region to an electrical signal.


According to an embodiment, the solar-blind UV detector further comprises electrical components configured to detect the electrical signal.


According to an embodiment, the solar-blind UV detector is functional to detect the electrical signal from the nanowires in different pixels separately.


According to an embodiment, each of the nanowires comprises a photodiode or forms a photodiode with the substrate, wherein the avalanche photodiode is functional to convert at least a portion of UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region impinged on the nanowires. According to an embodiment, the photodiode can be an avalanche photodiode.


According to an embodiment, each of the nanowires comprises a first heavily doped semiconductor layer, a lightly doped semiconductor layer or an intrinsic semiconductor layer, a second heavily doped semiconductor layer, and a metal silicide layer; wherein the first heavily doped semiconductor layer is disposed on the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer; the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer is disposed on the second heavily doped semiconductor layer; the second heavily doped semiconductor layer is disposed on the metal silicide layer; the metal silicide layer is disposed on the substrate; the first heavily doped semiconductor layer is of an opposite type from the second heavily doped semiconductor layer; and wherein the first heavily doped semiconductor layer, the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer, and the second heavily doped semiconductor layer form the photodiode. An intrinsic semiconductor, also called an undoped semiconductor or i-type semiconductor, is a substantially pure semiconductor without any significant dopant species present. A heavily doped semiconductor is a semiconductor with such a high doping level that the semiconductor starts to behave electrically more like a metal than as a semiconductor. A lightly doped semiconductor is a doped semiconductor but not have a doping level as high as a heavily doped semiconductor. In a lightly doped semiconductor, dopant atoms create individual doping levels that can often be considered as localized states that can donate electrons or holes by thermal promotion (or an optical transition) to the conduction or valence bands respectively. At high enough impurity concentrations (i.e. heavily doped) the individual impurity atoms may become close enough neighbors that their doping levels merge into an impurity band and the behavior of such a system ceases to show the typical traits of a semiconductor, e.g. its increase in conductivity with temperature.


According to an embodiment, the solar-blind UV detector further comprises a common electrode disposed on and electrically connected to ends of all the nanowires, wherein the common electrode is substantially transparent to UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region.


According to an embodiment, the common electrode is made of graphene.


According to an embodiment, space between the nanowires is filled with an oxide layer.


According to an embodiment, the solar-blind UV detector further comprises a metal grid on the common electrode, the metal grid configured to provide mechanical support for the common electrode.


According to an embodiment, each of the nanowires comprises a core of lightly doped semiconductor, an intermediate shell of intrinsic semiconductor and an outer shell of doped semiconductor; wherein the intermediate shell is conformally disposed over the core; the outer shell is conformally disposed over the intermediate shell; the outer shell is of an opposite type from the core; and the outer shell, the intermediate shell and the core form the photodiode.


According to an embodiment, each nanowire further comprises a heavily doped semiconductor layer of the same type as the core, and a metal silicide layer; wherein the heavily doped semiconductor layer and a metal silicide layer are sandwiched between the core and the substrate; the intermediate shell and the outer shell do not contact the heavily doped semiconductor layer and the metal silicide layer; and the metal silicide layer is in contact with the substrate and forms electrical contact to the substrate.


According to an embodiment, a solar-blind image sensor comprises the solar-blind UV detector above and electronic circuitry functional to detect electrical signals generated by the nanowires of the solar-blind UV detector.


According to an embodiment, the electronic circuitry comprises a high voltage supply.


According to an embodiment, a method of fabricating an image sensor comprising a substrate, a plurality of pixels, a plurality of nanowires in each of the plurality of pixel, wherein the plurality of nanowires extend essentially perpendicularly from the substrate; the method comprises bonding the plurality of nanowires onto the substrate. The term “image sensor” as used herein means a device that converts an optical image to an electric signal. An image sensor can be used in digital cameras and other imaging devices. Examples of image sensors include a charge-coupled device (CCD) or a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) active pixel sensor.


According to an embodiment, the method further comprises conducting lithography, ion implantation, annealing, evaporation, atomic layer deposition, chemical vapor deposition, dry etch or a combination thereof.


According to an embodiment, the image sensor is a solar-blind UV detector or a color image sensor. The term “color image sensor” as used herein means an image sensor capable of converting an optical image in the visible spectrum (i.e. a color image) to an electric signal.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES


FIG. 1A shows one of the plurality of nanowires on a substrate.



FIG. 1B shows simulated absorptance of the nanowire of FIG. 1A.



FIG. 1C shows optional couplers on the nanowires.



FIG. 2A and 2B show a perspective view and a top view of an image sensor according an embodiment.



FIG. 3 shows an SBUV detector according to one embodiment.



FIG. 4 shows an exemplary fabrication process of an image sensor such as the SBUV detector in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 shows an SBUV detector according to one embodiment.



FIG. 6 shows an exemplary fabrication process of an image sensor such as the SBUV detector in FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 shows an SBUV detector according to one embodiment.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary fabrication process of an image sensor such as the SBUV detector in FIG. 7.



FIG. 9 shows a block diagram of a solar-blind image sensor.



FIG. 10 shows a schematic of the SBUV detector being used as fore optics.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part thereof. In drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless the context dictates otherwise. The illustrate embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here.


This disclosure is drawn to, among other things, methods of use, methods of fabrication, apparatuses, systems, and devices related to an SBUV detector for detecting UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region. The SBUV region is the range of wavelengths in which the earth atmosphere absorbs essentially all UV radiation from the sun to the earth. For example, the wavelength region of 300 nm to 200 nm is within the SBUV region. A device that detects radiation only in the SBUV region and rejects visible and infrared radiation is called an SBUV detector or an SBUV sensor.


Sunlight does not interfere or blind a SBUV detector of the embodiments herein. Therefore, the SBUV detector of the embodiments herein is particularly useful for detecting manmade radiation sources that emit in the SBUV region and enjoys a very low false alarm rate. Such manmade radiation sources can include exhaust plumes of shoulder launched surface to air missiles (SLSAM), fire and flame, or any other UV emitting source including hydrogen flames. An SBUV detector of the embodiments herein can function at all lightning conditions including full daylight, without interference from the solar radiation and with very high signal to background ratio.


According to an embodiment, the SBUV detector comprises a substrate having a plurality of regions defined thereon (hereafter referred to as “pixels”). In each pixel, the SBUV detector comprises a plurality of nanowires extending essentially perpendicularly from the substrate. The term “nanowire” used herein means a structure whose dimension in a direction perpendicular to the substrate (hereafter referred to as the “normal direction”) is substantially greater than dimensions of the structure in any direction perpendicular to the normal direction (hereafter referred to as a “transverse direction”) and the dimensions in the transverse directions are less than 1000 nm. The plurality of nanowires can be equally or unequally spaced from each other, arranged in a regular array or in random. The plurality of nanowires are configured to react only to radiations in the SBUV region and not to react to radiations outside the SBUV region. Here, the term “react” is meant to broadly encompass absorbing, reflecting, coupling to, detecting, interacting with, converting to electrical signals, etc.



FIG. 1A shows one of the plurality of nanowires 100 on an SBUV detector 10. For brevity, only one nanowires is shown but the SBUV detector 10 can comprise a plurality of nanowires 100, such as more than 1000, or more than 1000000. The nanowires 100 extend essentially perpendicularly from a substrate 130. Each of the nanowires 100 preferably comprises a core 110, preferably made of silicon, and a cladding 120 surrounding the core 110. The substrate 130 is preferably a metal. The core 110 preferably has high refractive index than the cladding 120. The term “cladding” as used herein means a layer of substance surrounding the core 110.



FIG. 1B shows simulated absorptance of the SBUV detector 10 of UV light with wavelengths between 100 and 400 nm, incident in the normal direction. FIG. 1B clearly shows that absorptance of the SBUV detector 10 of UV light with wavelengths between 140 and 290 nm is greater than 50% and absorptance of UV light drops quickly to almost zero outside wavelength region of 140-290 nm. FIG. 1B indicate that the SBUV detector 10 indeed only reacts to radiations in the SBUV region. As shown in FIG. 1C, each of the nanowires 100 can further comprise a coupler 140 disposed on an end of the nanowire 100 away from the substrate 130 (hereafter referred to as the “receiving end”). The term “coupler” as used herein means a layer effective to guide light into the nanowires.


According to an embodiment, the nanowires 100 have a diameter of from about 5 nm to about 30 nm, preferably about 20 nm. According to an embodiment, the nanowires 100 have a diameter of from about 5 nm to about 150 nm. The cladding 130 has a thickness of about 10 nm to about 200 nm, preferably about 30 nm. Pitch of the nanowires 100 (i.e. center-to-center distance of one of the plurality of nanowires to a nearest neighbor thereof) is from about 0.2 μm to about 2 μm. Height (i.e. dimension in the normal direction) of the nanowires 100 is from about 0.1 μm to about 5 μm. Each pixel can have one or more nanowires 100.



FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B shows a perspective view and a top view, respectively, of the SBUV detector 10. For brevity, only four pixels (regions enclosed by dotted rectangles) are shown. The nanowires 100 preferably detect UV radiation in the SBUV region by converting it to an electrical signal. For example, each nanowire 100 can comprise a photodiode (such as an avalanche photodiode) or form a photodiode (such as an avalanche photodiode) with the substrate 130. The SBUV detector 10 can further comprise electrical components configured to detect the electrical signal from the nanowires 100, for example, Readout Integrated Circuits (ROIC) in the substrate 130, an electrode 150 disposed between and electrically connected to all the nanowires 110 on each pixel, a common electrode 160 disposed on and electrically connected to the receiving ends of all the nanowires 110 in the entire SBUV detector 10. Preferably, the SBUV detector 10 can detect electrical signals from the nanowires 100 in different pixels separately.



FIG. 3 shows an SBUV detector 20 according to one embodiment. For brevity, two pixels 20a and 20b of a substrate 230 are illustrated. The SBUV detector 20, however, can comprise a plurality of pixels such as more than 100, more than 1000, more than 1000000. The pixels preferably have a pitch of about 0.5 μm micron to 100 μm (more preferably 2 μm). In each of the pixels 20a and 20b, the SBUV detector 20 comprises a plurality of nanowires 200, respectively. Each of the nanowires 200 comprises an APD, the APD being functional to convert at least a portion of UV radiation in the SBUV region impinged the nanowires 200 to an electrical signal. The nanowires 200 do not generate any electrical signal from any radiation outside the SBUV region. Each nanowire 200 comprises a first heavily doped semiconductor layer 222, a lightly doped semiconductor layer or an intrinsic semiconductor layer 221, a second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225, and a metal silicide layer 231. The first heavily doped semiconductor layer 222 is disposed on the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer 221. The lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer 221 is disposed on the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225. The second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225 is disposed on the metal silicide layer 231. The metal silicide layer 231 is disposed on the substrate 230. The first heavily doped semiconductor layer 222 is of an opposite type from the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225. As used herein, one semiconductor having an opposite type from another semiconductor means the former is n type if the latter is p type or, the former is p type if the latter is n type. The first heavily doped semiconductor layer 222, the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer 221, and the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225 form an APD. The metal silicide layer 231 forms electrical contact to any electrical components of the substrate 230. A common electrode 240 is disposed on the receiving ends of and electrically connected to all the nanowires 200. The common electrode 240 is substantially transparent to UV radiation in the SBUV region. For example, the common electrode 240 can be made of graphene. Space between the nanowires 200 is preferably filled with an oxide layer 236. The term “transparent” as used herein means a transmittance of at least 70%.



FIG. 4 shows an exemplary method of fabrication of the SBUV detector 10.


In step 1000, a silicon substrate 224 is provided, wherein the silicon substrate 224 comprises a silicon oxide layer 223 thereon and the first heavily doped semiconductor layer 222 (e.g. heavily doped p type silicon) on the silicon oxide layer 223. A substrate of semiconductor material other than silicon (e.g. III-V or II-VI group compound semiconductor) can also be used.


In step 1001, the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225 (e.g. heavily doped n type silicon) is fabricated on the layer 221 by a method such as ion implantation and subsequent annealing. An exemplary n type dopant suitable for use in the ion implantation is phosphorous, arsenic, antimony, or a combination thereof.


In step 1002, a resist layer 226 (e.g. a photoresist or an e-beam resist) is deposited on the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225, by a suitable method such as spin coating.


In step 1003, a pattern is formed in the resist layer 226 using a lithography technique (e.g. photolithrography or e-beam lithography) by removing portions 227 of the resist layer 226. The second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225 is exposed under the removed portions 227. The pattern corresponds to shapes and positions of the nanowires 200.


In step 1004, two metal layers 228 and 229 are deposited on the resist layer 226 and the exposed portions of the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225, using a suitable technique such as thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering. Exemplary metal suitable for use in the metal layers 228 and 229 are aluminum, gold, chromium, silver, copper, titanium, nickel or a combination thereof.


In step 1005, remainder of the resist layer 226 and portions of the metal layers 228 and 229 thereon are lift-off by a suitable technique such as plasma ashing and dissolution in a suitable solvent.


In step 1006, the nanowires 200 are formed by etching into the layers 225, 221 and 222, the using a suitable technique, such as dry etching with remainder of the metal layer 229 as etch mask, until portions of the silicon oxide layer 223 not directly below the remainder of the metal layer 229 are exposed. The nanowires 200 now comprise remainder of the layers 225, 221 and 222.


In step 1007, remainder of the metal layer 229 is removed by a suitable method such as etching with a suitable metal etchant. The metal layer 228 remains.


In step 1008, a silicide layer 231 is formed from the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 225 and the metal layer 228 thereon by annealing (e.g. at about 850° C. for about 30 minutes). Any remainder of the metal layer 228 is removed by a suitable technique such as etching with a suitable metal etchant.


In step 1009, an oxide layer 232 (e.g. HfO2, SiO2, Al2O3) is deposited isotropically over the nanowires 200 and the exposed portions of the silicon oxide layer 223, using suitable technique such as atomic layer deposition (ALD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The oxide layer 232 is functional to passivate surfaces of nanowires 200. For example, the oxide layer 232 has a thickness of about 30 nm. The terms “passivation” and “passivate” as used herein means a process of eliminating dangling bonds (i.e., unsatisfied valence on immobilized atoms).


In step 1010, portions of the oxide layer 232 above the silicide layer 231 and the exposed portions of the silicon oxide layer 223 are removed by a suitable technique such as anisotropic dry etch. Now the silicide layer 231 is exposed.


In step 1011, a sacrificial layer 233 is deposited by pouring, spin coating or evaporation to fill space between the nanowires 200. The sacrificial layer 233 can be a suitable material such as polydimethylsiloxane, polyimide or oxide.


In step 1012, the substrate 224 is removed using a suitable technique such as etching with potassium hydroxide, until the silicon oxide layer 233 is exposed.


In step 1013, a glass substrate 234 is bonded to the exposed silicon oxide layer 233, using a suitable technique such as using a UV removable glue. The glass substrate 234 can provide mechanical support.


In step 1014, the sacrificial layer 233 is removed by a suitable method such as wet etching. For example, polyimide can be removed by a suitable photoresist developer.


In step 1015, the nanowires 200 are bonded to ROIC in the substrate 230 using a tin-silver alloy layer between the substrate 230 and the silicide layer 231 and annealing at about 220° C.


In step 1016, the glass substrate 234 is released from the silicon oxide layer 233 by illumination with UV light.


In step 1017, the silicon oxide layer 233 is removed by a suitable method such as etching with HF followed by rinsing.


In step 1018, the oxide layer 236 is deposited by spin coating, evaporation or CVD to fill space between the nanowires 200. The insulating material 236 preferably is transparent to UV radiation in the SBUV region. The insulating material 236 can be any suitable material such as silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, and graphene oxide.


In step 1019, the oxide layer 236 is planarized using a suitable technique such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) until the first heavily doped semiconductor 222 of the nanowires 200 is exposed.


In step 1020, an oxide layer 238 and a metal layer 239 are sequentially deposited on a sacrificial silicon substrate 237 using a suitable method such as thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering. The metal layer 239 can be of any suitable material, such as nickel and iron.


In step 1021, a transparent conductive oxide (TCO) layer 240 is deposited on the metal layer 239 by a suitable method such as CVD using C2H4 or C2H2 gas. The TCO layer 240 can be any suitable material such as graphene. The TCO layer 240 is substantially transparent to UV radiation in the SBUV region.


In step 1022, a plastic layer 241 is deposited on the TCO layer 240 by a suitable method such as spin coating. The plastic layer 241 can be any suitable material such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA).


In step 1023, the sacrificial silicon substrate 237, the oxide layer 238 and the metal layer 239 are removed by a suitable method such as wet etching with KOH, HF, metal etchant, respectively.


In step 1024, the TCO layer 240 and the plastic layer 241 are transfer onto the receiving ends of the nanowires 200 under a wet condition, followed by annealing at about 220 ° C. for about 20 minutes to form electrical contact between the TCO layer 240 and the receiving ends of the nanowires 200.


In step 1025, the plastic layer 241 is removed by a suitable method such dry etch or wet etch.


In step 1026, a resist layer 242 (e.g. a photoresist or an e-beam resist) is deposited on the TCO layer 240 (which functions as the common electrode 240), by a suitable method such as spin coating. A pattern is formed in the resist layer 242 using a lithography technique (e.g. photolithrography or e-beam lithography) by removing portions of the resist layer 425 above boundaries of pixels of the substrate 230.


In step 1027, a metal layer 243 is deposited, using a suitable method such as thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering. Exemplary metal suitable for use in the metal layer 243 are aluminum, gold, chromium, silver, copper, titanium, nickel or a combination thereof.


In step 1028, remainder of the resist layer 242 and portions of the metal layer 243 thereon are lift-off by a suitable technique such as plasma ashing and dissolution in a suitable solvent.



FIG. 5 shows an SBUV detector 30 according to one embodiment. For brevity, two pixels 30a and 30b of a substrate 330 are illustrated. The SBUV detector 30, however, can comprise a plurality of pixels such as more than 100, more than 1000, more than 1000000. The pixels preferably have a pitch of about 0.5 μm micron to 100 μm (more preferably 2 μm). In each of the pixels 30a and 30b, the SBUV detector 30 comprises a plurality of nanowires 300, respectively. Each of the nanowires 300 comprises an APD, the APD being functional to convert at least a portion of UV radiation in the SBUV region impinged on the nanowires 300 to an electrical signal. The nanowires 300 do not generate any electrical signal from any radiation outside the SBUV region. Each nanowire 300 comprises a first heavily doped semiconductor layer 322, a lightly doped semiconductor layer or an intrinsic semiconductor layer 321, a second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325, and a metal silicide layer 331. The first heavily doped semiconductor layer 322 is disposed on the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer 321. The lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer 321 is disposed on the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325. The second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325 is disposed on the metal silicide layer 331. The metal silicide layer 331 is disposed on the substrate 330. The first heavily doped semiconductor layer 322 is of an opposite type from the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325. The first heavily doped semiconductor layer 322, the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer 321, and the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325 form an APD. The metal silicide layer 331 forms electrical contact to any electrical components of the substrate 330. A common electrode 340 is disposed on the receiving ends of and electrically connected to all the nanowires 300. The common electrode 340 is substantially transparent to UV radiation in the SBUV region. For example, the common electrode 340 can be made of graphene. Space between the nanowires 300 is preferably not filled. A metal grid on the common electrode 340 can provide mechanical support for the common electrode.



FIG. 6 shows an exemplary method of fabrication of the SBUV detector 30.


In step 2000, a silicon substrate 324 is provided, wherein the silicon substrate 324 comprises an silicon oxide layer 323 thereon and the first heavily doped semiconductor layer 322 (e.g. heavily doped p type silicon) on the silicon oxide layer 323. A substrate of semiconductor material other than silicon (e.g. III-V or II-VI group compound semiconductor) can also be used.


In step 2001, the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325 (e.g. heavily doped n type silicon) is fabricated on the layer 321 by a method such as ion implantation and subsequent annealing. An exemplary n type dopant suitable for use in the ion implantation is phosphorous, arsenic, antimony, or a combination thereof.


In step 2002, a resist layer 326 (e.g. a photoresist or an e-beam resist) is deposited on the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325, by a suitable method such as spin coating.


In step 2003, a pattern is formed in the resist layer 326 using a lithography technique (e.g. photolithrography or e-beam lithography) by removing portions 327 of the resist layer 326. The second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325 is exposed under the removed portions 327. The pattern corresponds to shapes and positions of the nanowires 300.


In step 2004, two metal layers 328 and 329 are deposited on the resist layer 326 and the exposed portions of the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325, using a suitable technique such as thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering. Exemplary metal suitable for use in the metal layers 328 and 329 are aluminum, gold, chromium, silver, copper, titanium, nickel or a combination thereof.


In step 2005, remainder of the resist layer 326 and portions of the metal layers 328 and 329 thereon are lift-off by a suitable technique such as plasma ashing and dissolution in a suitable solvent.


In step 2006, the nanowires 300 are formed by etching into the layers 325, 321 and 322, the using a suitable technique, such as dry etching with remainder of the metal layer 329 as etch mask, until portions of the silicon oxide layer 323 not directly below the remainder of the metal layer 329 are exposed. The nanowires 300 now comprise remainder of the layers 325, 321 and 322.


In step 2007, remainder of the metal layer 329 is removed by a suitable method such as etching with a suitable metal etchant. The metal layer 328 remains.


In step 2008, a silicide layer 331 is formed from the second heavily doped semiconductor layer 325 and the metal layer 328 thereon by annealing (e.g. at about 850° C. for about 30 minutes). Any remainder of the metal layer 328 is removed by a suitable technique such as etching with a suitable metal etchant.


In step 2009, an oxide layer 332 (e.g. HfO2, SiO2, Al2O3) is deposited isotropically over the nanowires 300 and the exposed portions of the silicon oxide layer 323, using suitable technique such as atomic layer deposition (ALD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The oxide layer 332 is functional to passivate surfaces of nanowires 200. For example, the oxide layer 332 has a thickness of about 30 nm.


In step 2010, portions of the oxide layer 332 above the silicide layer 331 and the exposed portions of the silicon oxide layer 323 are removed by a suitable technique such as anisotropic dry etch. Now the silicide layer 331 is exposed.


In step 2011, a sacrificial layer 333 is deposited by pouring, spin coating or evaporation to fill space between the nanowires 300. The sacrificial layer 333 can be a suitable material such as polydimethylsiloxane, polyimide or oxide.


In step 2012, the substrate is removed using a suitable technique such as etching with potassium hydroxide, until the silicon oxide layer 333 is exposed.


In step 2013, a glass substrate 334 is bonded to the exposed silicon oxide layer 333, using a suitable technique such as using a UV removable glue. The glass substrate 334 can provide mechanical support.


In step 2014, the sacrificial layer 333 is removed by a suitable method such as wet etching. For example, polyimide can be removed by a suitable photoresist developer.


In step 2015, the nanowires 300 are bonded to ROIC in the substrate 330 using a tin-silver alloy layer between the substrate 330 and the silicide layer 331 and annealing at about 220° C.


In step 2016, the glass substrate 334 is released from the silicon oxide layer 333 by illumination with UV light.


In step 2017, the silicon oxide layer 333 is removed by a suitable method such as etching with HF followed by rinsing.


In step 2018, an oxide layer 338 and a metal layer 339 are sequentially deposited on a sacrificial silicon substrate 337 using a suitable method such as thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering. The metal layer 339 can be of any suitable material, such as nickel and iron. The metal layer 339 preferably has a thickness at least 100 nm. A transparent conductive oxide (TCO) layer 340 (which functions as the common electrode 340) is then deposited on the metal layer 339 by a suitable method such as CVD using C2H4 or C2H2 gas. The TCO layer 340 can be any suitable material such as graphene. The TCO layer 340 is substantially transparent to UV radiation in the SBUV region. A resist layer 342 (e.g. a photoresist or an e-beam resist) is deposited on the TCO layer 340, by a suitable method such as spin coating.


In step 2019, a pattern is formed in the resist layer 342 using a lithography technique (e.g. photolithrography or e-beam lithography) by removing portions 343 of the resist layer 342. The TCO layer 340 is exposed under the removed portions 342. The removed portions 343 preferable have a width about 30 nm. The pattern can be a grid pattern in which the removed portions 343 separate the resist layer 342 into discrete square regions, which preferably have a width of about 120 nm.


In step 2020, two metal layers 345 and 346 are deposited on the resist layer 342 and the exposed portions of the TCO layer 340, using a suitable technique such as thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering. Exemplary metal suitable for use in the metal layers 345 and 346 are aluminum, gold, chromium, silver, copper, titanium, nickel or a combination thereof.


In step 2021, remainder of the resist layer 342 and portions of the metal layers 345 and 346 thereon are lift-off by a suitable technique such as plasma ashing and dissolution in a suitable solvent.


In step 2022, a plastic layer 341 is deposited on the TCO layer 340 by a suitable method such as spin coating. The plastic layer 341 can be any suitable material such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polydimethylsiloxane.


In step 2023, the sacrificial silicon substrate 337, the oxide layer 338 and the metal layer 339 are removed by a suitable method such as wet etching with KOH, HF, metal etchant, respectively.


In step 2024, the TCO layer 340, and the metal layers 345 and 346 are transfer onto the receiving ends of the nanowires 300 under a wet condition, followed by annealing at about 220° C. for about 20 minutes to form electrical contact between the TCO layer 340 and the receiving ends of the nanowires 300.


In step 2025, the plastic layer 341 is removed by a suitable method such dry etch or wet etch.



FIG. 7 shows a device 40 according to one embodiment. For brevity, two pixels 40a and 40b of a substrate 430 are illustrated. The SBUV detector 40, however, can comprise a plurality of pixels such as more than 100, more than 1000, more than 1000000. The pixels preferably have a pitch of about 0.5 μm micron to 100 μm (more preferably 2 μm). In each of the pixels 40a and 40b, the SBUV detector 40 comprises a plurality of nanowires 400, respectively. Each of the nanowires 400 comprises an APD, the APD being functional to convert at least a portion of UV radiation in the SBUV region impinged on the nanowires 400 to an electrical signal. The nanowires 400 do not generate any electrical signal from any radiation outside the SBUV region. Each nanowire 400 comprises a core 421 of lightly doped semiconductor, an intermediate shell 431 of intrinsic semiconductor and an outer shell 432 of doped semiconductor. The intermediate shell 431 is conformally disposed over the core 421. The outer shell 432 is conformally disposed over the intermediate shell 431. The outer shell 432 is of an opposite type from the core 421. The outer shell 432, the intermediate shell 431 and the core 421 form the APD. Each nanowire 400 can further comprise a heavily doped semiconductor layer 419 of the same type as the core 421, and a metal silicide layer 418 wherein the heavily doped semiconductor layer 419 and a metal silicide layer 418 are sandwiched between the core 421 and the substrate 430. As used herein, one semiconductor having a same type as another semiconductor means the former is n type if the latter is n type or, the former is p type if the latter is p type. The intermediate shell 431 and the outer shell 432 do not contact the heavily doped semiconductor layer 419 and the metal silicide layer 418. The metal silicide layer 418 is in contact with the substrate 430 and forms electrical contact to any electrical components of the substrate 430.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary method of fabrication of the SBUV detector 40.


In step 3000, a silicon substrate 410 is provided, wherein the silicon substrate 410 comprises a lightly doped semiconductor layer 421 (e.g. epitaxial n type silicon), and a silicon oxide layer 423 sandwiched between the silicon substrate 410 and the lightly doped semiconductor layer 421. A substrate of semiconductor material other than silicon (e.g. III-V or II-VI group compound semiconductor) can also be used.


In step 3001, the heavily doped semiconductor layer 419 (e.g. heavily doped n type silicon) is fabricated on the lightly doped semiconductor layer 421 by a method such as ion implantation and subsequent annealing. An exemplary n type dopant suitable for use in the ion implantation is phosphorous, arsenic, antimony, or a combination thereof.


In step 3002, a resist layer 426 (e.g. a photoresist or an e-beam resist) is deposited on the heavily doped semiconductor layer 425, by a suitable method such as spin coating.


In step 3003, a pattern is formed in the resist layer 426 using a lithography technique (e.g. photolithrography or e-beam lithography) by removing portions 427 of the resist layer 426. The heavily doped semiconductor layer 425 is exposed under the removed portions 427. The pattern corresponds to shapes and positions of the nanowires 400.


In step 3004, two metal layers 428 and 429 are deposited on the resist layer 426 and the exposed portions of the heavily doped semiconductor layer 425, using a suitable technique such as thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering. Exemplary metal suitable for use in the metal layers 428 and 429 are aluminum, gold, chromium, silver, copper, titanium, nickel or a combination thereof.


In step 3005, remainder of the resist layer 426 and portions of the metal layers 428 and 429 thereon are lift-off by a suitable technique such as plasma ashing and dissolution in a suitable solvent.


In step 3006, the nanowires 400 are formed by etching into the layers 425 and 421, the using a suitable technique, such as dry etching with remainder of the metal layer 429 as etch mask, until portions of the silicon oxide layer 423 not directly below the remainder of the metal layer 429 are exposed. The nanowires 400 now comprise remainder of the layers 425 and 421.


In step 3007, remainder of the metal layer 429 is removed by a suitable method such as etching with a suitable metal etchant. The metal layer 428 remains.


In step 3008, a silicide layer 418 is formed from the heavily doped semiconductor layer 425 and the metal layer 428 thereon by annealing (e.g. at about 850° C. for about 30 minutes). Any remainder of the metal layer 428 is removed by a suitable technique such as etching with a suitable metal etchant.


In step 3009, a sacrificial layer 433 is deposited by pouring, spin coating or evaporation to fill space between the nanowires 400. The sacrificial layer 433 can be a suitable material such as polydimethylsiloxane, polyimide or oxide.


In step 3010, the substrate 410 is removed using a suitable technique such as etching with potassium hydroxide, until the silicon oxide layer 423 is exposed.


In step 3011, a glass substrate 434 is bonded to the exposed silicon oxide layer 423, using a suitable technique such as using a UV removable glue. The glass substrate 434 can provide mechanical support.


In step 3012, the sacrificial layer 433 is removed by a suitable method such as wet etching. For example, polyimide can be removed by a suitable photoresist developer.


In step 3013, the nanowires 400 are bonded to ROIC in the substrate 330 using a tin-silver alloy layer between the substrate 330 and the silicide layer 418 and annealing at about 220° C.


In step 3014, the glass substrate 434 is released from the silicon oxide layer 423 by illumination with UV light.


In step 3015, the silicon oxide layer 423 is removed by a suitable method such as etching with HF followed by rinsing.


In step 3016, a resist layer 435 is deposited on the lightly doped semiconductor layer 421 by a suitable method such as imprinting.


In step 3017, an oxide layer 436 is deposited on the substrate 430 and the resist layer 435 by a suitable method such as thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering. The oxide layer 436 has a thickness greater than a total thickness of the heavily doped layer 419 and the silicide layer 418.


In step 3018, remainder of the resist layer 435 and portions of the oxide layer 436 thereon are lift-off by a suitable technique such as plasma ashing and dissolution in a suitable solvent.


In step 3019, an intrinsic amorphous silicon (a-Si) layer (is deposited isotropically over the lightly doped semiconductor layer 421 and the oxide layer 436 to form the intermediate shell 431, using a suitable technique such as ALD or CVD. ALD is preferred.


In step 3020, a doped a-Si layer is deposited isotropically over the intermediate shell 431 to form the outer shell 432, using a suitable technique such as ALD or CVD. The SBUV detector 40 is then annealed in a suitable atmosphere (e.g. forming gas) at about 450° C. for about 30 minutes.


In step 3021, an oxide layer 437 (e.g. HfO2, SiO2, Al2O3) is deposited isotropically over the outer shell 432, using suitable technique such as ALD or CVD. The oxide layer 437 is functional to passivate surfaces of the outer shell 432.


According to one embodiment as shown in FIG. 9, the SBUV detector 10, 20, 30 or 40 can be integrated with electronic circuitry into a solar-blind image sensor. The electronic circuitry can include address decoders, a correlated double sampling circuit (CDS), a signal processor, a multiplexor and a high voltage supply (e.g. a DC high voltage supply capable of supplying at least 50 V, 100 V, 200 V or higher) for driving the APDs in the nanowires 100, 200, 300 or 400. The electronic circuitry is functional to detect the electrical signal generated by the nanowires 100, 200, 300 or 400.


The SBUV detector 10, 20, 30 or 40 can also be used as fore optics in a light detector apparatus as shown in the schematic in FIG. 10.


The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes by the use of diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples. Insofar as such diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those within the art that each function and/or operation within such diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof.


Those skilled in the art will recognize that it is common within the art to describe devices and/or processes in the fashion set forth herein, and thereafter use engineering practices to integrate such described devices and/or processes into data processing systems. That is, at least a portion of the devices and/or processes described herein can be integrated into a data processing system via a reasonable amount of experimentation.


The subject matter described herein sometimes illustrates different components contained within, or connected with, other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermediate components.


With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.


All references, including but not limited to patents, patent applications, and non-patent literature are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.


While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A device comprising: a substrate;a plurality of pixels;a plurality of nanowires in each of the plurality of pixel, the nanowires comprising silicon;wherein the plurality of nanowires are configured to detect a UV emitting source without interference from solar radiation.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the plurality of nanowires have an absorptance above 25% for UV light with a wavelength from 0.12 to 0.34 micron.
  • 3. The device of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of nanowires comprises a core and a cladding surrounding the core, wherein the core has a higher refractive index than the cladding.
  • 4. The device of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of the nanowires comprises a coupler disposed on an end of each of the nanowire away from the substrate, the coupler being functional to guide radiation into the nanowires.
  • 5. The device of claim 1, wherein the nanowires have a height from about 0.1 μm to about 5 μm; the cladding has a thickness of about 10 nm to about 200 nm.
  • 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the nanowires have a pitch from about 0.2 μm to about 2 μm.
  • 7. The device of claim 1, wherein the nanowires detect UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region by converting UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region to an electrical signal.
  • 8. The device of claim 7, wherein the device further comprises electrical components configured to detect the electrical signal.
  • 9. The device of claim 7, wherein the device is functional to detect the electrical signal from the nanowires in different pixels separately.
  • 10. The device of claim 1, wherein each of the nanowires comprises a photodiode or forms a photodiode with the substrate, wherein the photodiode is functional to convert at least a portion of UV radiation in the solar-blind UV region impinged on a nanowires.
  • 11. The device of claim 10, wherein each of the nanowires comprises a first heavily doped semiconductor layer,a lightly doped semiconductor layer or an intrinsic semiconductor layer,a second heavily doped semiconductor layer, anda metal silicide layer;wherein the first heavily doped semiconductor layer is disposed on the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer;the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer is disposed on the second heavily doped semiconductor layer;the second heavily doped semiconductor layer is disposed on the metal silicide layer;the metal silicide layer is disposed on the substrate;the first heavily doped semiconductor layer is of an opposite type from the second heavily doped semiconductor layer; andwherein the first heavily doped semiconductor layer, the lightly doped semiconductor layer or the intrinsic semiconductor layer, and the second heavily doped semiconductor layer form the photodiode.
  • 12. The device of claim 11, wherein the device further comprises a common electrode disposed on and electrically connected to ends of all the nanowires, wherein the common electrode is substantially transparent to UV radiation in a solar-blind UV region.
  • 13. The device of claim 12, wherein the common electrode is made of graphene.
  • 14. The device of claim 12, further comprising a metal grid on the common electrode, the metal grid configured to provide mechanical support for the common electrode.
  • 15. The device of claim 10, wherein each of the nanowires comprises a core of lightly doped semiconductor,an intermediate shell of intrinsic semiconductor andan outer shell of doped semiconductor;wherein the intermediate shell is conformally disposed over the core;the outer shell is conformally disposed over the intermediate shell;the outer shell is of an opposite type from the core; andthe outer shell, the intermediate shell and the core form the photodiode.
  • 16. The device of claim 15, wherein each nanowire further comprises a heavily doped semiconductor layer of the same type as the core, and a metal silicide layer;wherein the heavily doped semiconductor layer and a metal silicide layer are sandwiched between the core and the substrate;the intermediate shell and the outer shell do not contact the heavily doped semiconductor layer and the metal silicide layer; andthe metal silicide layer is in contact with the substrate and forms electrical contact to the substrate.
  • 17. The device of claim 10, wherein the photodiode is an avalanche photodiode.
  • 18. The device of claim 1, wherein space between the nanowires is filled with an oxide layer.
  • 19. A solar-blind image sensor, comprising the device of claim 1 and electronic circuitry functional to detect electrical signals generated by the nanowires of the device.
  • 20. The solar-blind image sensor of claim 19, wherein the electronic circuitry comprises a high voltage supply.
  • 21. A method of detecting UV radiation, comprising obtaining the device of claim 1, and detecting UV radiation with the device of claim 1.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein UV radiation in a solar-blind UV region.
  • 23. The device of claim 1, wherein the nanowires have a diameter from about 5 nm to about 30 nm.
  • 24. A method of fabricating the device of claim 1, the method comprising: obtaining the plurality of nanowires and the substrate, andbonding the plurality of nanowires onto the substrate.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, further comprising conducting lithography, ion implantation, annealing, evaporation, atomic layer deposition, chemical vapor deposition, dry etch or a combination thereof.
  • 26. The method of claim 24, wherein the image sensor is a device or a color image sensor.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/487,375 filed Sep. 16, 2014, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 13/048,635 filed Mar. 15, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,835,905 issued on Sep. 16, 2014). This application is related to the disclosures of U.S. patent application Nos. 12/204,686, filed Sep. 4, 2008 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,646,943, issued Jan. 12, 2010), Ser. No. 12/648,942, filed Dec. 29, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,229,255, issued Jul. 24, 2012), Ser. No. 13/556,041, filed Jul. 23, 2012, Ser. No. 12/270,233, filed Nov. 13, 2008 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,274,039, issued Sep. 25, 2012), Ser. No. 13/925,429, filed Jun. 24, 2013, Ser. No. 13/570,027, filed Aug. 8, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,471,190, issued Jun. 25, 2013), Ser. No. 12/472,264, filed May 26, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,269,985, issued Sep. 18, 2012), Ser. No. 13/621,607, filed Sep. 17, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,514,411, issued Aug. 20, 2013), Ser. No. 13/971,523, filed Aug. 20, 2013 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,810,808, issued Aug. 19, 2014), Ser. No. 12/472,271, filed May 26, 2009 (now abandoned), Ser. No. 12/478,598, filed Jun. 4, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,546,742, issued Oct. 1, 2013), Ser. No. 14/021,672, filed Sep. 9, 2013, Ser. No. 12/573,582, filed Oct. 5, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,791,470, issued Jul. 29, 2014), Ser. No. 14/274,448, filed May 9, 2014, Ser. No. 12/575,221, filed Oct. 7, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,384,007, issued Feb. 26, 2013), Ser. No. 12/633,323, filed Dec. 8, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,735,797, issued May 27, 2014), Ser. No. 14/068,864, filed Oct. 31, 2013, Ser. No. 14/281,108, filed May 19, 2014, Ser. No. 13/494,661, filed Jun. 12, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,754,359, issued Jun. 17, 2014), Ser. No. 12/633,318, filed Dec. 8, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,519,379, issued Aug. 27, 2013), Ser. No. 13/975,553, filed Aug. 26, 2013 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,488, issued Apr. 29, 2014), Ser. No. 12/633,313, filed Dec. 8, 2009, Ser. No. 12/633,305, filed Dec. 8, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,299,472, issued Oct. 30, 2012), Ser. No. 13/543,556, filed Jul. 6, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,766,272, issued Jul. 1, 2014), Ser. No. 14/293,164, filed Jun. 2, 2014, Ser. No. 12/621,497, filed Nov. 19, 2009 (now abandoned), Ser. No. 12/633,297, filed Dec. 8, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,889,455, issued Nov. 18, 2014), Ser. No. 12/982,269, filed Dec. 30, 2010, Ser. No. 12/966,573, filed Dec. 13, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,866,065, issued Oct. 21, 2014), Ser. No. 12/967,880, filed Dec. 14, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,748,799, issued Jun. 10, 2014), Ser. No. 14/291,888, filed May 30, 2014 Ser. No. 12/966,514, filed Dec. 13, 2010, Ser. No. 12/974,499, filed Dec. 21, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,507,840, issued Aug. 13, 2013), Ser. No. 12/966,535, filed Dec. 13, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,890,271, issued Nov. 18, 2014), Ser. No. 12/910,664, filed Oct. 22, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,000,353 issued Apr. 7, 2015), Ser. No. 12/945,492, filed Nov. 12, 2010, Ser. No. 13/047,392, filed Mar. 14, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,835,831, issued Sep. 16, 2014), Ser. No. 14/450,812, filed Aug. 4, 2014, Ser. No. 13/106,851, filed May 12, 2011, Ser. No. 13/288,131, filed Nov. 3, 2011, Ser. No. 14/334,848, filed Jul. 18, 2014, Ser. No. 14/032,166, filed Sep. 19, 2013, Ser. No. 13/543,307, filed Jul. 6, 2012, Ser. No. 13/963,847, filed Aug. 9, 2013, Ser. No. 13/693,207, filed Dec. 4, 2012, 61/869,727, filed Aug. 25, 2013, Ser. No. 14/322,503, filed Jul. 2, 2014, and Ser. No. 14/311,954, filed Jun. 23, 2014, Ser. No. 14/459,398, filed Aug. 14, 2014, Ser. No. 14/501,983 filed Sep. 30, 2014, Ser. No. 14/503,598, filed Oct. 1, 2014, Ser. No. 14/516,162, filed Oct. 16, 2014, Ser. No. 14/563,781, filed Dec. 8, 2014 are each hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (500)
Number Name Date Kind
1918848 Land Jul 1933 A
3903427 Pack Sep 1975 A
4017332 James Apr 1977 A
4292512 Miller Sep 1981 A
4316048 Woodall Feb 1982 A
4357415 Hartman Nov 1982 A
4387265 Dalal Jun 1983 A
4394571 Jurisson Jul 1983 A
4400221 Rahilly Aug 1983 A
4443890 Eumurian Apr 1984 A
4513168 Borden Apr 1985 A
4531055 Shepherd, Jr. Jul 1985 A
4620237 Traino Oct 1986 A
4678772 Segal Jul 1987 A
4827335 Saito May 1989 A
4846556 Haneda Jul 1989 A
4857973 Yang Aug 1989 A
4876586 Dyck Oct 1989 A
4880613 Satoh Nov 1989 A
4896941 Hayashi Jan 1990 A
4950625 Nakashima Aug 1990 A
4971928 Fuller Nov 1990 A
4972244 Buffet Nov 1990 A
4990988 Lin Feb 1991 A
5071490 Yokota Dec 1991 A
5081049 Green Jan 1992 A
5096520 Faris Mar 1992 A
5124543 Kawashima Jun 1992 A
5217911 Denda Jun 1993 A
5247349 Olego Sep 1993 A
5272518 Vincent Dec 1993 A
5311047 Chang May 1994 A
5347147 Jones Sep 1994 A
5362972 Yazawa Nov 1994 A
5374841 Goodwin Dec 1994 A
5391896 Wanlass Feb 1995 A
5401968 Cox Mar 1995 A
5449626 Hezel Sep 1995 A
5468652 Gee Nov 1995 A
5602661 Schadt Feb 1997 A
5612780 Rickenbach Mar 1997 A
5671914 Kalkhoran Sep 1997 A
5696863 Kleinerman Dec 1997 A
5723945 Schermerhorn Mar 1998 A
5747796 Heard May 1998 A
5767507 Uenlue Jun 1998 A
5798535 Huang Aug 1998 A
5844290 Furumiya Dec 1998 A
5853446 Carre Dec 1998 A
5857053 Kane Jan 1999 A
5872365 Goh Feb 1999 A
5877492 Fujieda Mar 1999 A
5880495 Chen Mar 1999 A
5885881 Ojha Mar 1999 A
5900623 Tsang May 1999 A
5943463 Unuma Aug 1999 A
5968528 Deckner Oct 1999 A
6013871 Curtin Jan 2000 A
6033582 Lee Mar 2000 A
6037243 Ha Mar 2000 A
6046466 Ishida Apr 2000 A
6074892 Bowers Jun 2000 A
6100551 Lee Aug 2000 A
H1939 Geller Feb 2001 H
6270548 Campbell Aug 2001 B1
6301420 Greenaway Oct 2001 B1
6326649 Chang Dec 2001 B1
6388243 Berezin May 2002 B1
6388648 Clifton May 2002 B1
6407439 Hier Jun 2002 B1
6459034 Muramoto Oct 2002 B2
6463204 Ati Oct 2002 B1
6542231 Garrett Apr 2003 B1
6563995 Keaton May 2003 B2
6566723 Vook May 2003 B1
6680216 Kwasnick Jan 2004 B2
6709929 Zhang Mar 2004 B2
6720594 Rahn Apr 2004 B2
6771314 Bawolek Aug 2004 B1
6805139 Savas Oct 2004 B1
6812473 Amemiya Nov 2004 B1
6904187 Fischer et al. Jun 2005 B2
6927145 Yang Aug 2005 B1
6960526 Shah Nov 2005 B1
6967120 Jang Nov 2005 B2
6969899 Yaung Nov 2005 B2
6987258 Mates Jan 2006 B2
6992298 Nayfeh Jan 2006 B2
6996147 Majumdar Feb 2006 B2
7052927 Fletcher May 2006 B1
7064372 Duan Jun 2006 B2
7105428 Pan Sep 2006 B2
7106938 Baek et al. Sep 2006 B2
7109517 Zaidi Sep 2006 B2
7153720 Augusto Dec 2006 B2
7163659 Stasiak Jan 2007 B2
7192533 Bakkers Mar 2007 B2
7208783 Palsule Apr 2007 B2
7230286 Cohen Jun 2007 B2
7235475 Kamins Jun 2007 B2
7241434 Anthony Jul 2007 B2
7253017 Roscheisen Aug 2007 B1
7254151 Lieber Aug 2007 B2
7262400 Yaung Aug 2007 B2
7265328 Mouli Sep 2007 B2
7272287 Bise Sep 2007 B2
7285812 Tang Oct 2007 B2
7306963 Linden Dec 2007 B2
7307327 Bahl Dec 2007 B2
7311889 Awano Dec 2007 B2
7326915 Kaluzhny Feb 2008 B2
7330404 Peng Feb 2008 B2
7335962 Mouli Feb 2008 B2
7336860 Cyr Feb 2008 B2
7339110 Mulligan et al. Mar 2008 B1
7358583 Reznik Apr 2008 B2
7381966 Starikov Jun 2008 B2
7388147 Mulligan Jun 2008 B2
7416911 Heath Aug 2008 B2
7446025 Cohen Nov 2008 B2
7462774 Roscheisen Dec 2008 B2
7471428 Ohara Dec 2008 B2
7491269 Legagneux Feb 2009 B2
7507293 Li Mar 2009 B2
7521322 Tang Apr 2009 B2
7524694 Adkisson Apr 2009 B2
7582857 Gruev Sep 2009 B2
7598482 Verhulst Oct 2009 B1
7622367 Nuzzo Nov 2009 B1
7626685 Jin Dec 2009 B2
7646138 Williams Jan 2010 B2
7646943 Wober Jan 2010 B1
7647695 MacNutt Jan 2010 B2
7649665 Kempa Jan 2010 B2
7655860 Parsons Feb 2010 B2
7663202 Wang Feb 2010 B2
7692860 Sato Apr 2010 B2
7704806 Chae Apr 2010 B2
7713779 Firon May 2010 B2
7719678 Kamins May 2010 B2
7719688 Kamins May 2010 B2
7732769 Snider Jun 2010 B2
7732839 Sebe Jun 2010 B2
7736954 Hussain Jun 2010 B2
7740824 Godfried Jun 2010 B2
7790495 Assefa Sep 2010 B2
7888155 Chen Feb 2011 B2
7902540 Cohen Mar 2011 B2
7948555 Kwon et al. May 2011 B2
8030729 Quitoriano Oct 2011 B2
8035184 Dutta Oct 2011 B1
8049203 Samuelson Nov 2011 B2
8063450 Wernersson Nov 2011 B2
8067299 Samuelson Nov 2011 B2
8067736 Gruss Nov 2011 B2
8084728 Tsang Dec 2011 B2
8093675 Tsunemi Jan 2012 B2
8118170 Sato Feb 2012 B2
8143658 Samuelson Mar 2012 B2
8154127 Kamins Apr 2012 B1
8193524 Bjoerk Jun 2012 B2
8208776 Tokushima Jun 2012 B2
8212138 Landis Jul 2012 B2
8222705 Ogino Jul 2012 B2
8242353 Karg Aug 2012 B2
8269985 Wober Sep 2012 B2
8274039 Wober Sep 2012 B2
8299472 Yu Oct 2012 B2
8330090 Agarwal Dec 2012 B2
8384007 Yu Feb 2013 B2
8455857 Samuelson Jun 2013 B2
8471190 Wober Jun 2013 B2
8514411 Wober Aug 2013 B2
8546742 Wober Oct 2013 B2
8748799 Wober Jun 2014 B2
8766272 Yu et al. Jul 2014 B2
8791470 Wober Jul 2014 B2
8810808 Wober Aug 2014 B2
8835831 Yu et al. Sep 2014 B2
8866065 Wober Oct 2014 B2
9000353 Seo Apr 2015 B2
20020003201 Yu Jan 2002 A1
20020020846 Pi Feb 2002 A1
20020021879 Lee Feb 2002 A1
20020071468 Sandstrom Jun 2002 A1
20020104821 Bazylenko Aug 2002 A1
20020109082 Nakayama Aug 2002 A1
20020117675 Mascarenhas Aug 2002 A1
20020130311 Lieber Sep 2002 A1
20020172820 Majumdar Nov 2002 A1
20030003300 Korgel Jan 2003 A1
20030006363 Campbell Jan 2003 A1
20030077907 Kao Apr 2003 A1
20030089899 Lieber May 2003 A1
20030103744 Koyama Jun 2003 A1
20030132480 Chau Jul 2003 A1
20030160176 Vispute Aug 2003 A1
20030189202 Li Oct 2003 A1
20030227090 Okabe Dec 2003 A1
20040011975 Nicoli Jan 2004 A1
20040021062 Zaidi Feb 2004 A1
20040026684 Empedocles Feb 2004 A1
20040058058 Shchegolikhin Mar 2004 A1
20040065362 Watabe Apr 2004 A1
20040075464 Samuelson Apr 2004 A1
20040095658 Buretea May 2004 A1
20040109666 Kim Jun 2004 A1
20040114847 Fischer et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040118337 Mizutani Jun 2004 A1
20040118377 Bloms Jun 2004 A1
20040122328 Wang Jun 2004 A1
20040124366 Zeng Jul 2004 A1
20040155247 Benthien Aug 2004 A1
20040156610 Charlton Aug 2004 A1
20040160522 Fossum Aug 2004 A1
20040180461 Yaung Sep 2004 A1
20040213307 Lieber Oct 2004 A1
20040217086 Kawashima Nov 2004 A1
20040223681 Block Nov 2004 A1
20040241965 Merritt Dec 2004 A1
20040252957 Schmidt et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261840 Schmit Dec 2004 A1
20050009224 Yang Jan 2005 A1
20050035381 Holm Feb 2005 A1
20050082676 Andry Apr 2005 A1
20050087601 Gerst Apr 2005 A1
20050095699 Miyauchi May 2005 A1
20050109388 Murakami May 2005 A1
20050116271 Kato Jun 2005 A1
20050133476 Islam Jun 2005 A1
20050161662 Majumdar Jul 2005 A1
20050164514 Rauf Jul 2005 A1
20050190453 Dobashi Sep 2005 A1
20050201704 Ellwood Sep 2005 A1
20050218468 Owen Oct 2005 A1
20050224707 Guedj Oct 2005 A1
20050242409 Yang Nov 2005 A1
20050284517 Shinohara Dec 2005 A1
20060011362 Tao Jan 2006 A1
20060027071 Barnett Feb 2006 A1
20060038990 Habib Feb 2006 A1
20060113622 Adkisson Jun 2006 A1
20060115230 Komoguchi et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060121371 Wu Jun 2006 A1
20060146323 Bratkovski Jul 2006 A1
20060162766 Gee Jul 2006 A1
20060208320 Tsuchiya et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060257071 Bise Nov 2006 A1
20060260674 Tran Nov 2006 A1
20060273262 Sayag Dec 2006 A1
20060273389 Cohen Dec 2006 A1
20060284118 Asmussen Dec 2006 A1
20070012980 Duan Jan 2007 A1
20070012985 Stumbo Jan 2007 A1
20070023799 Boettiger Feb 2007 A1
20070025504 Tumer Feb 2007 A1
20070029545 Striakhilev Feb 2007 A1
20070052050 Dierickx Mar 2007 A1
20070076481 Tennant Apr 2007 A1
20070082255 Sun Apr 2007 A1
20070099292 Miller May 2007 A1
20070104441 Ahn May 2007 A1
20070107773 Fork May 2007 A1
20070108371 Stevens May 2007 A1
20070114622 Adkisson May 2007 A1
20070120254 Hurkx May 2007 A1
20070126037 Ikeda Jun 2007 A1
20070137697 Kempa Jun 2007 A1
20070138376 Naughton Jun 2007 A1
20070138380 Adkisson Jun 2007 A1
20070138459 Wong Jun 2007 A1
20070139740 Igura Jun 2007 A1
20070140638 Yang Jun 2007 A1
20070145512 Rhodes Jun 2007 A1
20070148599 True Jun 2007 A1
20070152248 Choi Jul 2007 A1
20070155025 Zhang Jul 2007 A1
20070164270 Majumdar Jul 2007 A1
20070170418 Bowers Jul 2007 A1
20070172623 Kresse Jul 2007 A1
20070187787 Ackerson Aug 2007 A1
20070196239 Vink Aug 2007 A1
20070200054 Reznik Aug 2007 A1
20070205483 Williams Sep 2007 A1
20070217754 Sasaki Sep 2007 A1
20070228421 Shioya Oct 2007 A1
20070238265 Kurashina Oct 2007 A1
20070238285 Borden Oct 2007 A1
20070241260 Jaeger Oct 2007 A1
20070246689 Ge Oct 2007 A1
20070248958 Jovanovich Oct 2007 A1
20070272828 Xu Nov 2007 A1
20070278476 Black Dec 2007 A1
20070278500 Lin Dec 2007 A1
20070285378 Lankhorst Dec 2007 A1
20070290193 Tucker Dec 2007 A1
20070290265 Augusto Dec 2007 A1
20080001498 Muller Jan 2008 A1
20080006319 Bettge Jan 2008 A1
20080029701 Onozawa Feb 2008 A1
20080036038 Hersee Feb 2008 A1
20080044984 Hsieh Feb 2008 A1
20080047601 Nag Feb 2008 A1
20080047604 Korevaar Feb 2008 A1
20080055451 Kanbe Mar 2008 A1
20080065451 For Mar 2008 A1
20080073742 Adkisson Mar 2008 A1
20080079022 Yamamoto Apr 2008 A1
20080079076 Sheen Apr 2008 A1
20080083963 Hsu Apr 2008 A1
20080088014 Adkisson Apr 2008 A1
20080090401 Bratkovski Apr 2008 A1
20080092938 Majumdar Apr 2008 A1
20080096308 Santori Apr 2008 A1
20080108170 Adkisson May 2008 A1
20080116537 Adkisson May 2008 A1
20080128760 Jun Jun 2008 A1
20080137188 Sato et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080143906 Allemand et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080145965 Reznik Jun 2008 A1
20080149914 Samuelson Jun 2008 A1
20080149944 Samuelson Jun 2008 A1
20080157253 Starikov Jul 2008 A1
20080166883 Liu Jul 2008 A1
20080169017 Korevaar Jul 2008 A1
20080169019 Korevaar Jul 2008 A1
20080173615 Kim Jul 2008 A1
20080178924 Kempa Jul 2008 A1
20080188029 Rhodes Aug 2008 A1
20080191278 Maekawa Aug 2008 A1
20080191298 Lin Aug 2008 A1
20080211945 Hong Sep 2008 A1
20080218740 Williams Sep 2008 A1
20080224115 Bakkers Sep 2008 A1
20080225140 Raynor Sep 2008 A1
20080233280 Blanchet Sep 2008 A1
20080237568 Kobayashi Oct 2008 A1
20080246020 Kawashima Oct 2008 A1
20080246123 Kamins Oct 2008 A1
20080248304 Hanrath Oct 2008 A1
20080251780 Li Oct 2008 A1
20080258747 Kluth Oct 2008 A1
20080260225 Szu Oct 2008 A1
20080264478 Ahn Oct 2008 A1
20080266556 Kamins Oct 2008 A1
20080266572 Kamins Oct 2008 A1
20080271783 Murakami Nov 2008 A1
20080277646 Kim Nov 2008 A1
20080283728 Inoue Nov 2008 A1
20080283883 Shim Nov 2008 A1
20080297281 Ayazi Dec 2008 A1
20080311693 Maxwell Dec 2008 A1
20080311712 Anwar Dec 2008 A1
20090001498 Wang Jan 2009 A1
20090020150 Atwater Jan 2009 A1
20090020687 Lehmann et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032687 Lapstun Feb 2009 A1
20090046362 Guo Feb 2009 A1
20090046749 Mizuuchi Feb 2009 A1
20090050204 Habib Feb 2009 A1
20090052029 Dai et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090057650 Lieber Mar 2009 A1
20090072145 Peczalski Mar 2009 A1
20090104160 Young Apr 2009 A1
20090120498 Yamazaki May 2009 A1
20090121136 Gruss May 2009 A1
20090127442 Lee May 2009 A1
20090146198 Joe Jun 2009 A1
20090151782 Ko Jun 2009 A1
20090152664 Klem Jun 2009 A1
20090153961 Murakami Jun 2009 A1
20090165844 Dutta Jul 2009 A1
20090173976 Augusto Jul 2009 A1
20090179225 Fertig Jul 2009 A1
20090179289 Park Jul 2009 A1
20090188552 Wang Jul 2009 A1
20090189144 Quitoriano Jul 2009 A1
20090189145 Wang Jul 2009 A1
20090194160 Chin Aug 2009 A1
20090199597 Danley Aug 2009 A1
20090201400 Zhang Aug 2009 A1
20090206405 Doyle Aug 2009 A1
20090223558 Sun Sep 2009 A1
20090224245 Umezaki Sep 2009 A1
20090224349 Gambino Sep 2009 A1
20090230039 Hoenig Sep 2009 A1
20090233445 Lee Sep 2009 A1
20090242018 Ahn Oct 2009 A1
20090243016 Kawahara Oct 2009 A1
20090244514 Jin Oct 2009 A1
20090260687 Park Oct 2009 A1
20090261438 Choi Oct 2009 A1
20090266418 Hu Oct 2009 A1
20090266974 Verhulst Oct 2009 A1
20090272423 Niira Nov 2009 A1
20090278998 El-Ghoroury Nov 2009 A1
20090289320 Cohen Nov 2009 A1
20090305454 Cohen Dec 2009 A1
20100006817 Ohlsson Jan 2010 A1
20100019252 Bratkovski Jan 2010 A1
20100019296 Cha Jan 2010 A1
20100019355 Kamins Jan 2010 A1
20100025710 Yamada Feb 2010 A1
20100078055 Vidu Apr 2010 A1
20100090341 Wan Apr 2010 A1
20100101633 Park Apr 2010 A1
20100104494 Meng Apr 2010 A1
20100110433 Nedelcu et al. May 2010 A1
20100116976 Wober May 2010 A1
20100127153 Agarwal May 2010 A1
20100132779 Hong Jun 2010 A1
20100133986 Kim Jun 2010 A1
20100136721 Song Jun 2010 A1
20100148221 Yu Jun 2010 A1
20100163714 Wober Jul 2010 A1
20100163941 Jung Jul 2010 A1
20100178018 Augusto Jul 2010 A1
20100186809 Samuelson Jul 2010 A1
20100187404 Klem Jul 2010 A1
20100200065 Choi Aug 2010 A1
20100207103 Farrow Aug 2010 A1
20100218816 Guha Sep 2010 A1
20100229939 Shen Sep 2010 A1
20100230653 Chen Sep 2010 A1
20100237454 Fujisawa Sep 2010 A1
20100244108 Kohnke Sep 2010 A1
20100244169 Maeda Sep 2010 A1
20100249877 Naughton Sep 2010 A1
20100258184 Laughlin Oct 2010 A1
20100276572 Iwabuchi Nov 2010 A1
20100277607 Choi Nov 2010 A1
20100282314 Coakley Nov 2010 A1
20100295019 Wang Nov 2010 A1
20100302440 Wober Dec 2010 A1
20100304061 Ye Dec 2010 A1
20100308214 Wober Dec 2010 A1
20100313952 Coakley Dec 2010 A1
20100319763 Park Dec 2010 A1
20100320444 Dutta Dec 2010 A1
20110018424 Takada Jan 2011 A1
20110036396 Jayaraman Feb 2011 A1
20110037133 Su Feb 2011 A1
20110049572 Jeon et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110050042 Choi Mar 2011 A1
20110057231 Jeon et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110057234 Jeon et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110057286 Jeon et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110080508 Katsuno Apr 2011 A1
20110084212 Clark Apr 2011 A1
20110127490 Mi Jun 2011 A1
20110133060 Yu Jun 2011 A1
20110133160 Yu Jun 2011 A1
20110135814 Miyauchi Jun 2011 A1
20110139176 Cheung Jun 2011 A1
20110146771 Chuang Jun 2011 A1
20110147870 Ang Jun 2011 A1
20110180894 Samuelson Jul 2011 A1
20110195577 Kushibiki Aug 2011 A1
20110220191 Flood Sep 2011 A1
20110226937 Yu Sep 2011 A1
20110248315 Nam Oct 2011 A1
20110249219 Evans Oct 2011 A1
20110249322 Wang Oct 2011 A1
20110253982 Wang Oct 2011 A1
20110272014 Mathai Nov 2011 A1
20110297214 Kim Dec 2011 A1
20110309237 Seo et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110309240 Yu et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110309331 Yu Dec 2011 A1
20110315988 Yu Dec 2011 A1
20110316106 Kim Dec 2011 A1
20120006390 Huo et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120009714 Mouli Jan 2012 A1
20120014837 Fehr et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029328 Shimizu Feb 2012 A1
20120031454 Fogel Feb 2012 A1
20120060905 Fogel Mar 2012 A1
20120075513 Chipman et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120153124 Yu Jun 2012 A1
20120192939 Tamboli et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120196383 Nitkowski et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120196401 Graham Aug 2012 A1
20120240999 Yoshida Sep 2012 A1
20120258563 Ogino Oct 2012 A1
20120280345 Zhu Nov 2012 A1
20120298843 Yu Nov 2012 A1
20120313078 Fukui Dec 2012 A1
20120318336 Hekmatshoar-Tabari et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120322164 Lal Dec 2012 A1
20130000704 Fogel Jan 2013 A1
20130020620 Wober Jan 2013 A1
20130037100 Platzer Bjorkman et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130112256 Yu May 2013 A1
20130125965 Hazeghi et al. May 2013 A1
20130174904 Yamasaki Jul 2013 A1
20130220406 Day Aug 2013 A1
20130341749 Yu et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140045209 Chou Feb 2014 A1
20140096816 Atwater et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140117401 Herner May 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (65)
Number Date Country
1624925 Jun 2005 CN
1306619 Mar 2007 CN
100350429 Nov 2007 CN
101459185 Jun 2009 CN
100568516 Dec 2009 CN
101675522 Mar 2010 CN
101681941 Mar 2010 CN
103201858 Jul 2013 CN
0809303 Sep 2006 EP
2923651 May 2009 FR
2348399 Apr 2000 GB
359013708 Jan 1984 JP
59198413708 Jan 1984 JP
2000324396 Nov 2000 JP
2002151715 May 2002 JP
2005252210 Sep 2005 JP
2005328135 Nov 2005 JP
2007134562 May 2007 JP
2007152548 Jun 2007 JP
2007184566 Jul 2007 JP
2007520877 Jul 2007 JP
2007201091 Aug 2007 JP
2007317961 Dec 2007 JP
2008288585 Nov 2008 JP
2009506546 Feb 2009 JP
2009236914 Oct 2009 JP
2012543250 Apr 2013 JP
2013513253 Apr 2013 JP
2013513254 Apr 2013 JP
I318418 May 2004 TW
I228782 Mar 2005 TW
200535914 Nov 2005 TW
200536048 Nov 2005 TW
200742115 Apr 2007 TW
200810100 Feb 2008 TW
200814308 Mar 2008 TW
200845402 Nov 2008 TW
200847412 Dec 2008 TW
200915551 Apr 2009 TW
200941716 Oct 2009 TW
201027730 Jul 2010 TW
201034172 Sep 2010 TW
201044610 Dec 2010 TW
201140859 Nov 2011 TW
8603347 Jun 1986 WO
0002379 Jan 2000 WO
02069623 Sep 2002 WO
03107439 Dec 2003 WO
2005064337 Jul 2005 WO
2007000879 Jan 2007 WO
2008069565 Jun 2008 WO
2008079076 Jul 2008 WO
2008079076 Jul 2008 WO
2008131313 Oct 2008 WO
2008135905 Nov 2008 WO
2008135905 Nov 2008 WO
2008135905 Nov 2008 WO
2008143727 Nov 2008 WO
2008131313 Dec 2008 WO
2009099841 Aug 2009 WO
2009116018 Sep 2009 WO
2009137241 Nov 2009 WO
2010019887 Feb 2010 WO
2010039631 Apr 2010 WO
2011074457 Jun 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (200)
Entry
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,812 mailed Jul. 23, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/293,164 mailed Aug. 14, 2015.
Office Action issued Jul. 9, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 102124069.
A. Gu et al., “Design and growth of III—V nanowire solar cell arrays on low cost substrates,” Conf. Record, 35rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Honolulu, Jun. 2010, pp. 20-25.
Office Action issued Jun. 23, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201310284409.6.
Office Action issued Aug. 12, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201180054442.9.
Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2015 in Japanese Application No. 2014-094365.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514 mailed Nov. 2, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,313 mailed Oct. 21, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/963,847 mailed Sep. 1, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,492 mailed Sep. 9, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/459,398 mailed Sep. 16, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,448 mailed Aug. 26, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,131 mailed Oct. 22, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,812 mailed Oct. 28, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,429 mailed Sep. 4, 2015.
Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 100141376.
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 103143553.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 27, 2015 in International Application No. PCT/US2015/038999.
Kosonocky, et al., 160×244 Element PtSi Schottky-Barrier IR-CCD Image Sensor, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. Ed-32, No. 8, Aug. 1985.
Office Action issued May 22, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 099142971.
Office Action mailed May 26, 2015 in Japanese Application No. 2014 138265.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,864 mailed Jun. 15, 2015.
Office Action issued on May 5, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201410264248.9.
CMOS image sensor pixel microlens array optimization using FDTD Solutions, http://www.lumerical—com/fdtd—microlens/cmos—image—sensor—pixel—microlens.php, pp. 1-2, Jun. 25, 2008.
Adler, Nanowire Lawns Make for Sheets of Image Sensors, NewScientist.com, Jul. 28, 2008.
Babinec et al., High-Flux, Low-Power Diamond Nanowire Single-Photon Source Arrays: An Enabling Material for Optical and Quantum Computing and Cryptography, obtained on Jul. 22, 2010 at URL: http://otd.harvard.edu/technologies/tech.php?case=3702.
Baillie et al., ‘Zero-space microlenses for CMOS image sensors: optical modeling and lithographic process development’, Publication Date May 2004, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004SPIE.5377..953B, pp. 1-2.
Barclay et al., Chip-Based Microcavities Coupled to NV Centers in Single Crystal Diamond, Applied Physics Letters, Nov. 12, 2009, vol. 95, Issue 19.
Brouri et al., Photon Antibunching in the Flurescence of Individual Colored Centers in Diamond, Optics Letters, Sep. 1, 2000, vol. 25, Issue 17.
CMOS image sensor pixel optical efficiency and optical crosstalk optimization using FDTD Solutions www.lumerical.com/fdtd—microlens/cmos—image—sensor—pixel—microlens.php, Mar. 19, 2009.
Baomin, et al., Nanotechology 23 (2012) 194003, 7 pages.
Canadian Office Action of Canadian Application No. 3,676,376, dated Oct. 11, 2013.
Catrysse, et al., An Integrated Color Pixel in 0.18pm CMOS Technology, Proceedings IEDM 2001, pp. 559-562.
Choi et al., Optimization of sidewall roughness in silica waveguides to reduce propagation losses, May 2001, Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2001. CLEO '01. Technical Digest. Summaries of papers presented at the Conference on, pp. 175-176.
Office Action issued May 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,448.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,269 mailed May 22, 2015.
Babinec et al., High-Flux, Low-Power Diamond Nanowire Single-Photon Source Arrays: An Enabling Material for Optical and Quantum Computing and Cryptography, obtained on Jul. 22, 2010 at URL:http://otd.harvard.edu/technologies/tech.php?case=3702.
Chung, Sung-Wook et al. Silicon Nanowire Devices. Applied Physics Letters, vol., 76, No. 15 (Apr. 10, 2000), pp. 2068-2070.
CMOS image sensor pixel optical efficiency and optical crosstalk optimization using FDTD Solutions' www.lumerical.com/fdtd—microlens/cmos—image—sensor—pixel—microlens.php, Mar. 19, 2009.
Deptuch et al., Vertically Integrated Circuits at Fermilab, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Aug. 2010, vol. 54, Issue 4, pp. 2178-2186.
Ekroll, On the Nature of Simultaneous Color Contrast, Dissertation, University of Kiel, 2005.
Fan et al., Large-Scale, Heterogeneous Integration of Nanowire Arrays for Image Sensor Circuitry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of the United States of America, Aug. 12, 2008, vol. 105, No. 32.
Fang et al., Fabrication of Slantingly-Aligned Silicon Nanowire Arrays for Solar Cell Applications, Nanotechnology, vol. 19, No. 25. 2008.
Furumiya, et al. ‘High-sensitivity and no-crosstalk pixel technology for embedded CMOS image sensor’; IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 48, No. 10, Oct. 2001.
Gadelrab et al., The Source-Gated Amorphous Silicon Photo-Transistor, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Oct. 1997, vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 1789-1794.
Gambino et al., ‘CMOS Imager with Copper Wiring and Lightpipe,’ Electron Devices Meeting, 2006. IEDM '06, International Publication Date: Dec. 11-13, 2006, pp. 1-4.
Garnett et al., Light Trapping in Silicon Nanowire Solar Cells, Nanoletters, Jan. 28, 2010, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 1082-1087.
Ge et al., Orientation-Controlled Growth of Single-Crystal Silicon-Nanowire Arrays, Advanced Materials, Jan. 18, 2005, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 56-61.
Guillaumee, et al.; Polarization Sensitive Silicon Photodiodes Using Nanostructured Metallic Grids, Applied Physics Letters 94, 2009.
Hanrath et al., Nucleation and Growth of Germanium Nanowires Seeded by Organic Monolayer-Coated Gold Nanocrystals, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Feb. 20, 2002, vol. 124, No. 7, pp. 1424-1429.
Hanrath et al., Supercritical Fluid-Liquid-Solid (SFLS) Synthesis of Si and Ge Nanowires Seeded by Colloidal Metal Nanocrystals, Advanced Materials, Mar. 4, 2003, vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 437-440.
Hochbaum et al., Controlled Growth of Si Nanowire Arrays for Device Integration, Nano Letters, Mar. 2005, vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 457-460.
Holmes et al., Control of Thickness and Orientation of Solution-Grown Silicon Nanowires, Science, Feb. 25, 2000, vol. 287, No. 5457, pp. 1471-1473.
Hsu, et al. ‘Light Guide for Pixel Crosstalk Improvement in Deep Submicron CMOS Image Sensor’; IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 1, Jan. 2004.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/035722, mailed Nov. 3, 2011.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/U62009/055963, mailed Mar. 17, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/035722, mailed Jul. 20, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/035726, mailed Jul. 21, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/055963, mailed Oct. 15, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/063592, mailed Jan. 13, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/035727, mailed Sep. 27, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051435, mailed Dec. 3, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051446, mailed Jan. 3, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/057227, mailed Jan. 26, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059468, mailed Feb. 11, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059491, mailed Feb. 9, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059501, mailed Feb. 15, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059504, mailed Apr. 7, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/060348, mailed Mar. 9, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/064635, mailed Apr. 13, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/066097, mailed Mar. 12, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/067712, mailed May 3, 2012.
Jin-Kon Kim; ‘New Functional Nanomaterials Based on Block Copolymers’ http://www.ziu.edu.cn/adver/subjectizyhd/jz0707061313.html, Jul. 11, 2007.
Juan et al., High Aspect Ratio Polymide Etching Using an Oxygen Plasma Generated by Electron Cyclotron Resonance Source, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, Jan./Feb. 1994, vol. 12, No. 1., pp. 422-426.
Junger, et al., Polarization- and wavelength-sensitive sub-wavelength structures fabricated in the metal layers of deep submicron CMOS processes, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7712, 2010.
Kalkofen et al., Atomic Layer Deposition of Boron Oxide as Dopant Source for Shallow Doping Silicon, Meeting Abstract 943, 217th ECS Meeting MP2010-O1 , Apr. 25-30, 2010 Vancouver Canada, El-Advanced Gate Stack, Source / Drain, and Channel Engineering for Si-Based CMOS 6: New Materials, Processes and Equipment.
Kane, Why Nanowires Make Great Photodetectors, EurekAlert.com article, Apr. 25, 2007.
Kempa, Thomas J. et al. Single and Tandem Axial p—i—n. Nanowire Photovoltaic Devices, Nano Letters, 2008, vol. 8, No. 10, 3456-3460.
Kim et al., Electronic Structure of Vertically Aligned Mn-Doped CoFe2O4 Nanowires and Their Application as Humidity Sensors and Photodetectors, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Apr. 7, 2009.
Law et al., Semiconductor Nanowires and Nanotubes, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2004, vol. 34, pp. 83-122.
Lee et al., Vertical Pillar-Superlattice Array and Graphene Hybrid Light Emitting Diodes, Nano Letters, 2010, vol. 10, pp. 2783-2788.
Lin et al., Fabrication of Nanowire Anisotropic Conductive Film for Ultra-fine Pitch Flip Chip Interconnection, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Jun. 20, 2005, 55th Proceedings, pp. 66-70.
Lin et al., Reducing Dark Current in a High-Speed Si-Based Interdigitated Trench-Electrode MSM Photodetector, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, May 2003, vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 1306-1313.
Loncar et al., Diamond Nanotechnology, SPIE Newsroom, May 18, 2010, obtained at url: http://spie.org/x40194.xml?ArticleID=x40194.
Loose et al., CMOS Detector technology, Scientific Technology, Scientific Detector Workshop, Sicily 2005, Experimental Astronomy, vol. 19, Issue 1-3, pp. 111-134.
Lu et al., Growth of Single Crystal Silicon Nanowires in Supercritical Solution from Tethered Gold Particles on a Silicon Substrate, NanoLetters, Jan. 2003, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 93-99.
Lugstein et al., Ga/Au Alloy Catalyst for Single Crystal Silicon-Nanowire Epitaxy, Applied Physics Letters, Jan. 8, 2007, vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 023109-1-023109-3.
Madou, Properties and Growth of Silicon, Including Crystalline Silicon, Fundamentals of Microfabrication, 2nd Ed., Press, 2002, pp. 125-204. CRC.
Makarova et al., Fabrication of High Density, High-Aspect-Ratio Polyimide Nanofilters, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, Nov./Dec. 2009, vol. 27, No. 6., pp. 2585-2587.
Morales et al., A Laser Ablation Method for the Synthesis of Crystalline Semiconductor Nanowires, Science, Jan. 9, 1998, vol. 279, pp. 208-211.
N. L. Dmitruk, et al.; ‘Modeling and Measurement of Optical Response of 1D Array of Metallic Nanowires for Sensing and Detection Application’; 26th International Conference on Microelectronics (MIEL 2008), NIS, Serbia, May 11-14, 2008.
Nguyen et al., Deep Reactive Ion etching of Polyimide for Microfluidic Applications, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Sep. 2007, vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 984-988.
Ozgur Yavuzcetin, et al.; ‘Index-tuned Anti-reflective Coating using a Nanostructured Metamaterial’; http://www.umass.edu/research/rld/bioportal/vuewtech.php?tid=40, Feb. 28, 2007.
Pain et al., A Back-Illuminated Megapixel CMOS Image Sensor, IEEE Workshop on Charge-Coupled Devices and Advanced Image Sensors, Karuizawa, Japan, Jun. 9-11, 2005, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Pasadena California.
Parraga et al., Color and Luminance Information in Natural Scenes, Journal of Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image, Science and Vision, Jun. 1998, vol. 15, No. 6.
Reynard Corporation; ‘Anti-Reflection Coatings (AR)’, http://www.reynardcorp.com/coating—anti—reflection.php, dowwnloaded Jun. 4, 2009.
Rosfjord et al., Nanowire Single-Photon Detector with an Integrated Optical Cavity and Anti-Reflection Coating, Optics Express: The International Electronic Journal of Optics; Jan. 23, 2006, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 527-534.
Rugani, First All-Nanowire Sensor, Technology Review, Aug. 13, 2008, Published by MIT.
Rutter, Diamond-Based Nanowire Devices Advance Quantum Science, SEAS Communications, Feb. 14, 2010, obtained at url:http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2010/02/digging-deep-into-diamonds/.
Sarkar et al., Integrated polarization-analyzing CMOS image sensor for detecting incoming light ray direction, Sensors Application Symposium (SAS), Mar. 29, 2012, p. 194-199, 1010 IEEE.
Schmidt et al., Realization of a Silicon Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor, Small, Jan. 2006, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 85-88.
Shimizu et al., Homoepitaxial Growth of Vertical Si Nanowires on Si(100) Substrate using Anodic Aluminum Oxide Template, (abstract only), Materials Research Society, Fall 2007.
Shockley, et al., Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p—n Junction Solar Cells, J. of Appl. Physics, vol. 32, No. 3, Mar. 1961, 10 pages.
Song et al., Vertically Standing Ge Nanowires on GaAs(110) Substrates, Nanotechnology 19, Feb. 21, 2008.
Thelander et al., Nanowire-Based One-Dimensional Electronics, Materials Today, Oct. 2006, vol. 9, No. 10, pp. 28-35.
Trentler, Timothy J. et al. Solution-Liquid-Solid Growth of Cyrstalline III-V Semiconductors: An Analogy to Vapor Liquid-Solid Growth. vol. 270(5243), Dec. 15, 1995, pp. 1791-1794.
Tseng, et al. Crosstalk improvement technology applicable to 0.14m CMOS image sensor; IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 13-15, 2004; IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 997-1000.
Verheijen, Marcel A. et al. Growth Kinetics of Heterostructured GaP-GaAs Nanowires. J. Am, Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1353-1359.
Wagner et al., Vapor-Liquid-Solid Mechanism of Single Crystal Growth, Applied Physics Letters, Mar. 1, 1964, vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 89-90.
Wang, Introduction to Nanotechnology—Where Opportunities arise & Great Future Being Built from Small Things, Fall 2008.
Wong et al., Lateral Nanoconcentrator Nanowire Multijunction Photovoltaic Cells, GCEP Progress report, Apr. 20, 2009, pp. 1-18.
Ye et al., Fabrication Techniques of High Aspect Ratio Vertical Lightpipes Using a Dielectric Photo Mask, SPIE, Proceedings, Feb. 2010, vol. 7591.
Zhang et al., Ultrahigh Responsivity Visible and Infrared Detection Using Silicon Nanowire Phototransistors, Nanoletters, May 14, 2010, vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 2117-2120.
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2010/059468, mailed Jun. 21, 2012.
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2010/059491, mailed Jun. 21, 2012.
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2010/059496, mailed Jun. 21, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2011/57325, mailed Jun. 22, 2012.
Jeong, et al., Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2971-2976.
Jeong et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 30(6), Nov./Dec. 2012.
Office Action issued on Mar. 3, 2014 in Chinese Application No. 200980142671.9.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514, mailed Mar. 19, 2013, 50 pages.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,661, mailed Mar. 7, 2013, 10 pages.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,582, dated Jun. 28, 2012.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,661, notification date Nov. 7, 2012.
Geyer et al., Model for the Mass Transport during Metal-Assisted Chemical Etching with Contiguous Metal Films as Catalysts, J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 13446-13451.
Hopkins, Addressing sidewall roughness using dry etching silicon and Si02, Jul. 1, 2004, ElectrolQ, vol. 47, Issue 7.
International Preliminary Search Report on Patentability of PCT/US2011/057325, mailed May 2, 2013 (9 pages).
Mei-Ling Kuo et al. “Realization of a near-perfect antireflection coating for silicon solar energy utilization” (Nov. 1, 2008, vol. 33, No. 21, Optics Letters).
Mukhopadhyay, When PDMS Isn't the Best, American Chemical Society, May 1, 2007.
Seo, et. al., “Multicolored vertical silicon nanowires,” Nano Letters, vol. 11 issue 4, pp. 1851-1856, 2010.
Taiwanese Office Action of Taiwan Patent Application No. 099116881, issued Jul. 18, 2013 (8 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,313, dated Aug. 1, 2013, 20 pages.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514, dated Aug. 15, 2013, 17 pages.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,535, mailed Jun. 14, 2013, 22 pages.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,573, dated Aug. 6, 2013, 13 pages.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/048,635, mailed Jun. 6, 2013, 24 pages.
Office Action issued on Jan. 28, 2014 in Taiwanese Application No. 100146327.
Office Action issued on Mar. 17, 2014 in Korean Application No. 10-2013-7018243.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,664, mailed Feb. 26, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514, mailed Feb. 25, 2014.
Office Action issued on Jun. 19, 2014 in Taiwanese Application No. 099133891.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,492 mailed May 13, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,269 mailed Jun. 11, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,851 mailed May 29, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/556,041 mailed Jun. 12, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/021,672 mailed May 9, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,313 mailed Aug. 1, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/693,207 mailed Oct. 9, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514 mailed Sep. 23, 2014.
Office Action issued on Jun. 24, 2014 in Taiwanese Application No. 098129911.
University of California San Diego, Class ECE 183 Lab 1, 2013.
Office Action issued on Oct. 29, 2014 in Korean Application No. 10-2013-7020107.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,429 mailed Nov. 4, 2014.
Corrected Notice of Allowability issued on Oct. 14, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,535.
Notice of Allowance issued on Dec. 1, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,664.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/543,307 mailed Dec. 24, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,448 mailed Dec. 5, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/056558 mailed Dec. 12, 2014.
Office Action issued on Nov. 11, 2014 in Taiwanese Application No. 098129911.
Notice of Allowance issued Jan. 30, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,375.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/050544 mailed Jan. 9, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,269, mailed Jan. 15, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,492 mailed Jan. 16, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/963,847 mailed Mar. 12, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514 mailed Mar. 10, 2015.
Office Action issued on Jan. 16, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201180054442.9.
Bernstein et al. “Modern Physics”, Chapter 14, Section 6, pp. 420-421, 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc.
Office Action issued Feb. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,429.
Office Action issued on Mar. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/556,041.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,131 mailed Apr. 17, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/281,108 mailed Apr. 6, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,812 mailed Apr. 1, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,313 mailed Apr. 9, 2015.
Office Action issued Jan. 4, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/311,954.
Office Action issued Jan. 5, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/291,888.
Office Action issued Nov. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. 14/503,598.
Office Action issued Jan. 15, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,739.
Office Action issued Jan. 4, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/293,164.
Office Action issued Jan. 7, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/322,503.
Office Action issued Jan. 14, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/459,398.
Office Action issued on Nov. 25, 2015 in Japanese Application No. 2015-005091.
Office Action issued Nov. 17, 2015 in Taiwanese Application 103102171.
Office Action issued Nov. 20, 2015 in Taiwanese Application 104108370.
Office Action issued on Nov. 27, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 100138526.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 8, 2016 in International Application No. PCT/US2015/055728.
Office Action issued Dec. 28, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 102149110.
Office Action issued Dec. 25, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201410264248.9.
Office Action issued Dec. 30, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 104123757.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 27, 2015 in International Application PCT/US2015/038999.
Office Action issued Jan. 15, 2016 in Chinese Application No. 201180066970.6.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Feb. 9, 2016 in International Application PCT/US2014/050544.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Feb. 9, 2016 in International Application PCT/US2015/55710.
Office Action issued Feb. 4, 2016 in U.S. Appl. 14/274,448.
Office Action issued Mar. 7, 2016 in U.S. Appl. 14/450,812.
Office Action issued Feb. 25, 2016 in Chinese Application No. 201180051048.X.
Office Action issued Feb. 1, 2016 in Taiwanese Application 102124069.
Office Action issued Feb. 6, 2016 in Chinese Application No. 201180054442.9.
Office Action mailed Mar. 29, 2016 in Japanese Application No. 2014-138265.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Mar. 22, 2016 in International Application PCT/US2014/056558.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150236059 A1 Aug 2015 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14487375 Sep 2014 US
Child 14705380 US
Parent 13048635 Mar 2011 US
Child 14487375 US