Embodiments of the present invention relate to sockets and, more particularly, to microprocessor sockets having an optical interconnect.
Since the introduction of the Personal Computer (PC), the microprocessor has interfaced with the system motherboard through a socket. The role of the socket is to provide electrical connectivity between the microprocessor and the motherboard, while also allowing tool-free installation, removal and interchangeability of the microprocessor without damage.
As microprocessor speeds have continued to increase, socket requirements are becoming more challenging. Power consumption continues to trend upward, driven by the increased leakage current of smaller silicon features, the increased dynamic current required to scale frequency, and the incorporation of multiple cores within a single package. At the same time, the required socket bandwidth to support the necessary high-speed signaling is also increasing rapidly.
Many microprocessor sockets used today are built around the pin grid array (PGA) architecture. Here, pins on the underside of the processor are inserted into the socket, usually with zero insertion force (ZIF). Newer socket designs use a land grid array (LGA) in which the pins are on the socket side instead and come in contact with pads on the processor. Thus, power and electrical signals may pass between the microprocessor and the motherboard via the socket.
Electrical interconnects may have their limitations. For example, currently planned electrical implementations of the common system interface (CSI) protocol links may be limited in the bandwidth distance product even at 6.4 gigabits/second (Gb/s). Among other things, CSI allows microprocessor cores to communicate with one another directly. The limitation imposed by the inadequate bandwidth distance product of electrical channels based on commercially available components and materials is currently solved by reducing the distance of the microprocessors in the multi-processor system or limiting system bandwidth. This is an unsustainable trend, however, and a better solution is desirable.
A low cost optical interconnect, closely packaged with the microprocessor, may alleviate electrical system constraints due to the improved channel bandwidth provided by optical interconnects. A split socket is disclosed that provides at least one cavity created at an outer edge of the microprocessor socket. An optical module may be fitted in the cavity thus providing an optical fiber or waveguide connection directly to the socket.
Referring now to
In this example, an approximately 4.2 mm deep cavity 106 is created at the outer edge of the microprocessor socket 100. This cavity may be formed by precision molding when the socket body 100 is made. The design of the cavity side walls may be used to enable the lateral alignment of the optical module with the LGA microprocessor package.
As shown in
As shown in
The optical module 202 should have a low vertical profile (approx. 1-2 mm inside the microprocessor package shadow). The optical module 202 does not need to be laterally confined to the shadow of the microprocessor package 300. The optical module 202 may “stick out” from under the microprocessor package 300, for example, to make room for electronic/optoelectronic components inside the optical module 202. In that case, a low vertical profile would be maintained inside the microprocessor shadow, but not necessarily outside.
The optical module 202 is not limited in technology by this implementation, allowing for modular upgrade of the optical performance, and cost and performance improvements over time. In one implementation the optical module could be a Silicon Optical Bench with thru-vias and a silicon cap.
Power delivery to the low profile optical module 202 may be accomplished in several ways. Three potential options are offered with reference to
As shown in
As shown in
In an alternate arrangement, as shown in
Referring to
The electronics may be integrated into the module or provided externally, potentially in the packaged microprocessor for instance. The optical components could also be different than those shown. For example, edge emitting lasers or waveguide based modulators may also provide the same functionality.
A low cost optical interconnect such as that described may have great advantages over the current remedies for link length reduction. It may allow those users who require greater performance to purchase the performance with only a small increase in complexity, even choosing to upgrade the performance at a later date by simply changing the socket on the board. The bandwidth distance product increase would allow the creation of novel system architectures because the achievable distance at a given bandwidth may jump dramatically (from approx. 0.5 meters to approx. 30 meters).
Although the proposed implementation is directed to microprocessor sockets, it may be easily used for non-microprocessor integrated circuits (ICs), such as input/output (I/O) hub devices or chip set solutions.
The above description of illustrated embodiments of the invention, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize.
These modifications can be made to the invention in light of the above detailed description. The terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined entirely by the following claims, which are to be construed in accordance with established doctrines of claim interpretation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6325552 | Brillhart | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347946 | Trobough et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6592269 | Brophy et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6637949 | Loch et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6815729 | Brophy et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6887109 | Hofmeister et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6945712 | Conn | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6955481 | Colgan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7008238 | Hofmeister et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7084496 | Benner et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7168863 | Yajima | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7195401 | Moll et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20010000763 | Muramatsu | May 2001 | A1 |
20050058408 | Colgan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064743 | Hofmeister et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050286239 | Trobough | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287837 | Trobough | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060078248 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105607 | Hougham et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060159405 | Yajima | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060182397 | Benner et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060291784 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |