A—Polishing bath according to the state of the art:
Result:
The surfaces were shiny, and the edges had been deburred.
Working range up to a concentration of 20 g/l of dissolved iron, at higher concentration there was a sharp increase in consumption of hydrogen peroxide. Beyond 30 g/l the bath was no longer serviceable and had to be regenerated by partial replacement. Starting at 25 g/l iron in solution there was increasing precipitation of sparingly soluble deposits (salt coatings).
It was possible to increase the activity by increasing the concentration of ammonium hydrogen difluoride up to an activity of 80 mg/(dm2 min). At higher activity the surfaces became matt and rough.
Result:
Smooth, shiny surfaces, edges deburred.
It was possible to increase the activity by increasing the concentration of HF and stabilizer up to 600 mg/(dm2 min) without any loss of quality. Moreover, no precipitates were found in the bath. The consumption of hydrogen peroxide did not increase. The bath was serviceable up to an iron concentration of 60 g/l.
The activity of bath (B) relative to bath (A) was up to 8 times higher, with correspondingly shorter times of action and 3 times longer service life. Furthermore, the costs for the chemicals were far lower for bath (B) than for bath (A).
Result:
Good shine, edges deburred. Starting from a content of 10 g/l copper, increasing consumption of hydrogen peroxide. Above a copper content of 20 g/l there was a marked decline in quality of the surfaces and sharply increasing consumption of hydrogen peroxide.
Result
Shiny surfaces up to a copper content of 50 g/l. Up to a copper content of 30 g/l in the solution, the consumption of hydrogen peroxide remains constant. At higher concentration there is a slight increase in consumption per hour of operation. This corresponds to a 2.5- to 3-fold service life of the bath according to the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 043 880.9 | Sep 2006 | DE | national |