Stacking fault and twin blocking barrier for integrating III-V on Si

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8617945
  • Patent Number
    8,617,945
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 3, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 31, 2013
    10 years ago
Abstract
A stacking fault and twin blocking barrier for forming a III-V device layer on a silicon substrate and the method of manufacture is described. Embodiments of the present invention enable III-V InSb device layers with defect densities below 1×108 cm−2 to be formed on silicon substrates. In an embodiment of the present invention, a buffer layer is positioned between a III-V device layer and a silicon substrate to glide dislocations. In an embodiment of the present invention, GaSb buffer layer is selected on the basis of lattice constant, band gap, and melting point to prevent many lattice defects from propagating out of the buffer into the III-V device layer. In a specific embodiment, a III-V InSb device layer is formed directly on the GaSb buffer.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to integrating III-V semiconductor devices upon silicon substrates. More particularly this invention relates to the buffer layer between a III-V semiconductor device and a silicon substrate.


2. Discussion of Related Art


A variety of electronic and optoelectronic devices can be enabled by developing thin film relaxed lattice constant III-V semiconductors on elemental silicon (Si) substrates. Surface layers capable of achieving the performance advantages of III-V materials may host a variety of high performance electronic devices such as CMOS and quantum well (QW) transistors fabricated from extreme high mobility materials such as, but not limited to, indium antimonide (InSb), indium gallium arsenide (InxGa1−xAs) (x>0.53) and indium arsenide (InAs). Optical devices such as lasers, detectors and photovoltaics may also be fabricated from various other direct band gap materials, such as, but not limited to, gallium arsenide (GaAs) and indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs). These devices can be further enhanced by monolithically integrating them with conventional devices of silicon and use of a silicon substrate has the additional advantage of cost reduction.


Despite all these advantages, the growth of III-V materials upon silicon substrates presents many challenges. Crystal defects are generated by lattice mismatch, polar-on-nonpolar mismatch and thermal mismatch between the III-V semiconductor epitaxial layer and the silicon semiconductor substrate. When the lattice mismatch between the epitaxial layer and substrate exceeds a few percent, the strain induced by the mismatch becomes too great and defects are generated in the epitaxial layer when the epitaxial film relaxes. Once the film thickness is greater than the critical thickness (film is strained below this thickness and relaxed above this thickness), the strain is relaxed by creating misfit dislocations at the film and substrate interface as well as in the epitaxial film. The epitaxial crystal defects are typically in the form of threading dislocations, stacking faults and twins (periodicity breaks where one portion of the lattice is a mirror image of another). Many defects, particularly threading dislocations, tend to propagate into the “device layer” where the semiconductor device is fabricated. Generally, the severity of defect generation correlates to the amount of lattice mismatch between the III-V semiconductor and the silicon substrate. For these reasons, the large lattice mismatch (approximately 19.2% between the exemplary indium antimonide (InSb) and silicon (Si) combination) typically results in an epitaxial device layer having a high defect density, on the order of 1×109 cm−2 to 1×1010 cm−2. The high defect density reduces the carrier mobility theoretically possible in bulk InSb, eliminating many of the technical advantages of “InSb-on-silicon” integration. For example, the electron mobility in bulk InSb films is estimated to be approximately 76,000 cm2/Vs. However, to date, the best reported electron mobility of an InSb film formed over a silicon substrate is significantly lower, approximately 40,000-50,000 cm2/Vs.


Similarly, a high defect density is also detrimental to photonic devices formed in or upon III-V semiconductor device layers on silicon substrates. The recombination-generation (R-G) energies of crystal defects are typically mid-gap, detracting from the performance of a semiconductor device layer that has been band gap engineered for a particular optical wavelength.


Various buffer layers have been used in attempts to relieve the strain induced by the lattice mismatch between the silicon substrate and the III-V device layer and thereby reduce the detrimental defect density of the device layer. For example, as shown in apparatus 100 of FIG. 1A, a material forms a buffer layer 170 between a silicon substrate 110 and a III-V device layer 180. A semiconductor device 190 is then fabricated in or upon device layer 180. Various materials have been utilized as the buffer layer 170. For example, an aluminum antimonide (AlSb) buffer layer 170 has been attempted as has a strontium titanate (SrTiO3) buffer layer 170 between a silicon substrate 110 and a III-V device layer 180. In practice however, as depicted in FIG. 1B, these buffer layers are unable to prevent twins 171, threading dislocations 173 and stacking faults 175 from propagating into the III-V device layer 180 as twins 181, threading dislocations 183, and stacking faults 185. Thus, there remains a need for a buffer layer architecture that enables lower defect density III-V semiconductor device layers formed upon silicon substrates.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is an illustration of a cross-sectional view of a conventional group III-V semiconductor device formed upon a silicon substrate.



FIG. 1B is an illustration of a cross-sectional view of a conventional group III-V semiconductor device layer formed upon a silicon substrate.



FIG. 2 is an illustration of a cross-sectional view of a group III-V semiconductor device layer formed upon a silicon substrate in accordance with the present invention.



FIGS. 3A-3D are illustrations of cross-sectional views of a method of fabricating a group III-V semiconductor device layer upon a silicon substrate in accordance with the present invention.



FIGS. 4A-4C are illustrations of cross-sectional views of a method of fabricating a quantum well (QW) transistor in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a method of fabricating a group III-V semiconductor device layer upon a silicon substrate in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

In various embodiments, a stacking fault and twin blocking barrier for integrating III-V semiconductor devices on silicon substrates is described with reference to figures. However, certain embodiments may be practiced without one or more of these specific details, or in combination with other known methods and materials. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth, such as specific materials, dimensions and processes, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In other instances, well-known semiconductor processes and manufacturing techniques have not been described in particular detail in order to not unnecessarily obscure the present invention. Reference throughout this specification to “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrase “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment of the invention. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.


Embodiments of the present invention reduce the dislocations within the III-V device layer formed over a silicon substrate to near bulk-like quality by utilizing a buffer architecture and specific fabrication techniques tailored to the particular III-V device layer desired. As shown in FIG. 2, embodiments of the present invention utilize a III-V semiconductor material buffer layer 240 formed between a silicon substrate 210 and III-V device layer 280 to form a semiconductor stack 200. In embodiments of the present invention, the III-V buffer layer 240 architecture is engineered for a particular III-V device layer material 280 with the materials for the III-V buffer layer 240 selected with consideration of lattice constant, band gap and melting point for the purpose of controlling nucleation and propagation of defects generated by lattice mismatch strain.


In particular embodiments, the III-V buffer layer 240 is formed on a vicinal surface of silicon substrate 210 having regular arrays of double-stepped (100) terraces across the substrate surface. A vicinal surface is a higher order crystal plane of the silicon substrate, such as, but not limited to the (211), (511), (013), (711) planes. A vicinal substrate surface having double-stepped terraces is capable of suppressing anti-phase domains (APD) in the III-V buffer layer 240. An APD is created when a first polar crystal domain of layer 240, having group III atoms attached to the nonpolar silicon substrate surface, meets a second polar crystal domain of layer 240, having group V atoms attached to the silicon substrate. A crystal discontinuity forms in layer 240 at the border between these first and second domains providing recombination-generation centers detrimental to the operation of a semiconductor device. The term “polar” refers to the partially ionic bonding character between the constituents of a III-V compound semiconductor.


Embodiments providing the double atomic step in the silicon substrate 210 provide for a terrace level of sufficient depth to prevent the growth species of buffer layer 240 from bonding to a higher level terrace even after all binding sites in the lowest terrace are occupied. Thus, the double step terrace prevents ad-hoc surface bonding so that the growth of the III-V buffer layer 240 proceeds in a stepwise fashion with each polar group III-V atomic bi-layer sequentially filling the lowest terrace of the nonpolar group IV, silicon substrate. In some embodiments, anti-phase domains are eliminated by growing layer 240 to a thickness greater than approximately 1.5 um. At such thicknesses, anti-phase domains are substantially annihilated and a single domain film can be formed even on first order planes, such as, but not limited to, the (100) silicon substrates commonly used for microelectronic fabrication. In alternative embodiments, a single domain layer 240 is grown such a manner that the formation of anti-phase domains is avoided. In such embodiments layer 240 may not be required to be thick, and may for example, be less than approximately 0.1 um in thickness using offcut Si substrate along with proper growth parameters such as growth rate, growth temperature and starting growth precursors. Additionally, buffer layer 240 grown according to embodiments of this invention may be substantially free of stacking faults and twins. The phrase substantially free of stacking faults and twins as used herein means that stacking fault and twin densities cannot be accurately measured using cross-section TEM or bandwidth TEM because such methods lose resolution below the detectible range of approximately 1×107 cm−2.


In a particular embodiment, the III-V buffer layer 240 has a lattice spacing larger than the silicon substrate 210, and the III-V device layer 280 has a lattice spacing larger than the III-V buffer layer 240. In one such an embodiment, buffer 240 is comprised of a gallium antimonide (GaSb) layer 240 formed between the silicon substrate 210 and an indium antimonide (InSb) device layer 280. The 6.09 Å lattice constant of GaSb layer 240 is approximately 12.2% larger than the 5.43 Å lattice constant of the Silicon substrate 210 upon which layer 240 is formed. The 6.48 Å lattice constant of the InSb layer 280 is approximately 6.2% larger than the GaSb layer 240. Thus, in this particular embodiment, the lattice constant of the buffer 240 incremented the lattice spacing of the silicon substrate 210 to the lattice spacing of the III-V device layer 280, thereby partitioning the total lattice mismatch between two separate material interfaces. In this manner, the InSb device layer 280 need only accommodate the strain of a 6.2% lattice mismatch with GaSb layer 240 rather than the entire 19.2% mismatch with the silicon substrate 210.


It should be appreciated that various III-V device layers, such as, but not limited to, indium arsenide (InAs) device layers may be similarly integrated with silicon substrates using other buffer embodiments. For example, in another embodiment of the present invention, III-V buffer layer 240 is comprised of a gallium arsenide (GaAs) formed between the silicon substrate 210 and indium arsenide (InAs) device layer 280 to graduate the lattice constant in a manner analogous to that just described for the InSb embodiment.


In embodiments of the present invention, the buffer 240 comprises materials which glide dislocations and terminate a significant percentage of the dislocations within the layer. In particular embodiments, the III-V buffer layer 240 is comprised of a relatively narrow band gap III-V semiconductor material. Generally, the extent of dislocation glide is dependent on the hardness of the material, with glide occurring more readily in softer materials. Semiconductor materials of narrower band gap are typically softer, and it has been found more dislocation glide occurs in narrower band gap materials. Furthermore, more of the dislocations are terminated or contained as the thickness of a material capable of dislocation glides is increased. In one particular embodiment, the III-V buffer layer 240 is GaSb having a thickness between approximately 0.3 um and 5.0 um. GaSb readily glides defects because the band gap of GaSb is relatively narrow, approximately 0.7 eV. Dislocation glide occurring within the GaSb changes the direction a defect propagates. This is particularly true for threading dislocations which typically propagate at an approximate sixty degree angle from the substrate surface. Gliding can change the direction of a threading dislocation to an angle more parallel to the surface of the film to terminate or contain the dislocations within the film as the buffer layer is thickened. For this reason, many of the defects induced by the strain of the 12.2% lattice mismatch between the silicon substrate 210 and a III-V buffer layer 240 of GaSb are glided and contained within the GaSb layer 240. Because many such glided dislocations will not propagate into subsequently grown films, it is therefore possible to avoid simply accumulating defects within the subsequent epitaxial layers.


As previously discussed, the 6.09 Å lattice constant of GaSb layer 240 is approximately 12.2% larger than the 5.43 Å lattice constant of the Silicon substrate 210 upon which layer 240 is formed. Because the band gap of GaSb is approximately 0.7 eV, the GaSb layer 240 is relatively soft and able to glide dislocations. In the same vein, it should be apparent that an embodiment utilizing GaSb provides better dislocation glide characteristics than an embodiment utilizing GaAs for the III-V buffer layer 240 because band gap of GaSb is lower than GaAs.


In embodiments of the present invention, the III-V buffer layer 240 has a low melting point temperature which improves the thermal activation of dislocation glide within layer 240 during the subsequent layer growth. Dislocation glide reduces the propagation of threading dislocations, stacking faults and twins into the subsequent layers. In a particular embodiment, for example, a III-V buffer layer 240 of GaSb has a melting point of approximately 712 C. In another particular embodiment, the melting point of a GaAs layer 240 is approximately 1237 C. Generally, the lower the melting point of the material, the better the dislocation glide.


In particular embodiments, buffer 240 allows for subsequent growth of a device layer 280 having an acceptably low final defect density. For such embodiments, the buffer 240 accommodates much of the 19.2% lattice mismatch between InSb device layer 280 and silicon substrate 210 to obtain a device layer having a threading dislocation defect density below 1×108 cm−2.


In embodiments of the present invention, the III-V device layer 280 of FIG. 2 is of the desired material and of a sufficient thickness to achieve low defect density. Because the lattice spacing of the III-V device layer 280 is considered in the design of the buffer 240, the III-V device layer 280 has significantly less lattice mismatch relative to the buffer 240 than to the silicon substrate 210. A substantial portion of the defects in device layer 280 generated by lattice mismatch strain or propagated from the buffer 240 are glided within III-V device layer 280 as the thickness of 280 is increased. In an embodiment of the present invention the device layer 280 is grown to approximately 2.5 um thick to ensure defect density in the device layer 280 is below 1×108 cm−2. In another embodiment the device layer 280 is grown to at least 7.5 um thick. Thus, the present embodiments provide for device-grade InSb on silicon substrates enabling electronic structures such as quantum well transistors to be formed on silicon substrates.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a method to fabricate a III-V device layer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Method 500 of FIG. 5 begins with an offcut silicon substrate at step 501. At step 502, a nucleation layer is formed as the initial step of a two step process to form a buffer layer. At step 503, the buffer layer is thickened with a growth process distinct from that used at step 502. In step 504, a III-V device layer is formed directly on the buffer and a device is fabricated in the III-V device layer at step 505. Each of these steps is discussed in greater detail below in reference to FIGS. 3A-3D.


Fabrication begins with silicon substrate 310. In a particular embodiment, substrate 310 has a vicinal surface, as shown in FIG. 3A. A vicinal surface is prepared by off-cutting the substrate from an ingot. In one such embodiment, the ingot is grown to provide wafer slices having (100) surfaces. The (100) substrate surface is then offcut at an angle between 2 and 12 degrees towards the [110] direction to produce a surface having terraces 312. Terraces 312 include a surface having a (100) crystal plane. The (100) plane surface area of each terrace 312 depends on the specific offcut angle, with a greater angle producing a greater number of terraces, each terrace having lesser (100) surface area. In such embodiments, the offcut produces a vicinal surface having an array of (100) terraces, many of which are separated by a double atomic step. As shown in the expanded view of FIG. 3A, a double step terrace has a height of two silicon atoms 311. In another embodiment, the silicon substrate offcut orientations are (211), (511), (013), (711) and other high index planes. Optionally, silicon substrate 310 is without an offcut (zero degree offcut), such as, but not limited to, common (100) substrates. Such a substrate (not pictured) typically does not have a substantial number of double atomic step terraces.


Next, the III-V buffer layer is formed upon the silicon substrate 310. Commonly known growth techniques may be used to form the III-V buffer layer, such as, but not limited to, metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) or molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). As previously discussed, in particular embodiments, the buffer is formed in a manner that either avoids the formation of anti-phase domains (APD) or annihilates them as the film thickness is increased.


In a particular embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3B and FIG. 3C, the III-V buffer layer 340 is formed using a two step process, wherein the growth conditions of each step are distinct. In the first step, as shown in FIG. 3B, a nucleation layer 320 is formed. The growth of nucleation layer 320, as shown in the expanded view, successively fills the lowest silicon substrate terraces with atomic bi-layers of the III-V semiconductor buffer material. In this embodiment, the mobility of both the group III and group V species of the nucleation layer 320 are sufficiently high that the atomic species introduced to the silicon surface travel about the surface of silicon substrate 310 and either fall into a terrace or completely off the silicon substrate surface. A species which falls down a terrace wall lacks the energy to scale back up the terrace wall, therefore the otherwise substantially random species motion can be effectively funneled in a direction dictated by the substrate terracing. Once the species reaches the lowest terrace, the silicon substrate bonding sites are located by the mobile species until every site is filled. Because of the double atomic step in the silicon substrate 310, a terrace completely filled with species 321 presents a single atomic step which the mobile species is unable to scale, and so excess species travel off the substrate surface without a significant number bonding to sites in the upper terrace levels. Subsequent introduction of the second species of the polar atomic pair is similarly funneled to the lowest terrace to bond with the first atomic species 321 to completely fill the lowest terrace with species 322. The growth process then proceeds in this iterative fashion until all terraces are filled and no nonpolar silicon substrate surface remains, at which point there is no longer risk of forming an APD in the polar buffer materials. Thus, depending on the offcut angle of the substrate, the number of terraces which must be successively filled varies. As the offcut angle increases, the number of terrace levels increases and the thickness of the nucleation layer must be increased to fill every terrace. In particular embodiments, therefore, the nucleation layer 320 is between approximately 50 Å and approximately 500 Å. In some embodiments, the nucleation layer 320 is between approximately 30 Å and approximately 300 Å.


The high mobility required to ensure the terraces are successively filled is provided for by the growth parameters of the nucleation layer 320 and these parameters therefore depend on the particular mobility characteristics of species comprising the material of layer 320. For example, in one embodiment, a nucleation layer 320 is formed using migration enhanced epitaxy (MEE) at a temperature of between 300 C and 600 C. MEE proceeds in a fashion similar to that of atomic layer deposition (ALD). MEE has a relatively slower growth rate, approximately 0.1 um/hr, because once the group V element is introduced to the substrate there is a hold time during which both the group V source and group III source shutters are closed (shuttered). This hold time accommodates the relatively lower mobility of the group V species. No hold time is required for group III species because surface migration of this species relatively higher mobility. In a particular MEE embodiment, the substrate surface is exposed to an antimony (Sb) source for approximately 10 seconds to form a monolayer of Sb on the lowest terrace level. The Sb source and is then shuttered for a hold time of approximately 60 seconds. This relatively long hold time allows for the Sb species to migrate on the surface of the silicon substrate to ensure the bonding sites of the lowest terrace level are filled. Then, the substrate surface is exposed to a gallium (Ga) source for approximately 10 seconds. No hold time is required because of the high surface mobility of Ga. Next, the Sb is reopened for approximately 10 second and then again closed for a hold time. This process is repeated to form a GaSb nucleation layer 320 sufficiently thick to fill all the terraces of the silicon substrate 310, approximately 150 Å in a particular embodiment. In an embodiment, GaSb nucleation temperatures are in between 300 C. and 600 C. In particular GaSb embodiment, the MEE growth temperature is between approximately 400 C. and approximately 510 C. Higher temperature embodiments enable a higher quality film. In other embodiments, MEE can be utilized to form a nucleation layer of an alternate buffer material, such as, but not limited to GaAs.


In yet another embodiment, a nucleation layer 320 is formed on the vicinal silicon substrate 310 utilizing traditional MBE (without migration enhancement). The relatively higher flux of this particular embodiment using traditional MBE provides higher film growth rates and therefore higher throughput than MEE embodiments. In a particular MBE nucleation embodiment, GaSb is formed on the silicon substrate 310 at a temperature between approximately 400 C. and approximately 510 C. The high-flux embodiments are well suited to GaSb because of the relatively low vapor pressure and high sticking coefficient of antimony (Sb) as compared to arsenic (As) of GaAs films.


Next, as shown in FIG. 3C, a second growth step completes the formation of the III-V buffer layer 340. This second growth step, performed at a higher temperature than that used for the nucleation layer 320, forms layer 330 to thicken the III-V buffer layer 340 and glide dislocations. The film quality of layer 330 is superior to that of the nucleation layer 320 because it is formed at a higher growth temperature. Also, during the formation of layer 330, the flux rate can be relatively high because the polar nucleation layer 320 eliminates any danger of APD formation. In an embodiment, a GaSb film 330 is grown upon a GaSb nucleation layer 320 at a growth temperature in the range of 500 C. and 700 C. In a particular embodiment, a GaSb film 330 is grown upon a GaSb nucleation layer 320 at a growth temperature between approximately 510 C. and approximately 570 C. In some embodiments of the present invention, the GaSb film 330 is grown to a thickness between approximately 0.3 um and 5.0 um. In an alternate embodiment, a GaAs film 330 is grown in a similar fashion upon a GaAs nucleation layer 320.


In other embodiments of the present invention, it is preferred to have a thin buffer layer 340. In some embodiments, a thin buffer layer 340 may function as a wetting layer, being only as thick as needed to bridge the non-polar/polar interface between the substrate 310 and buffer layer 340, as well as avoid the formation of anti-phase domains. Because the buffer layer 340 is thin, it is less efficient at transferring strain into a subsequently deposited layer than a thick buffer layer 340 may be. In one particular embodiment, the GaSb film 330 is grown to a maximum thickness of 0.3 um. In yet another embodiment, the GaSb film 330 is grown to a maximum thickness of 0.1 um. In some embodiments it is desirable to have the entire GaSb buffer layer 340, including nucleation layer 320 and layer 330, below approximately 0.1 um.


In still another embodiment, the III-V buffer layer 340 is formed on a traditional silicon substrate 310 having a lower order plane surface, such as, but not limited to (100). The III-V buffer layer 340 is grown without a nucleation step and permitted to form anti-phase domains. In an embodiment, the single-step growth is performed at a temperature between 500 C. and 700 C. Once the film thickness is greater than approximately 1.5 um, the anti-phase domains, along with the stacking faults and twins, are substantially annihilated and the film becomes single-domain. In a particular embodiment, a III-V buffer layer 340 comprising between approximately 1.5 and 2.0 um GaSb is formed on a traditional (100) silicon substrate 310 that has a 0 degree offcut.


Finally, with the completion of the buffer 340, device layer 380 is formed, as shown in FIG. 3D. Device layer 380 is grown at a temperature appropriate for the particular III-V material desired. In a particular embodiment, wherein buffer layer 340 comprises GaSb, an InSb device layer 380 is formed at a growth temperature between approximately 350 C. and approximately 475 C. Depending on the amount of lattice mismatch between the buffer 340 and the III-V device layer 380, as well as the ability for the device layer to glide dislocations, the device layer 380 is grown to a thickness sufficient to give an acceptable defect density. In a particular embodiment, an InSb device layer 380 is grown to a thickness greater than approximately 2 um. In a further embodiment, an InSb device layer 380 is grown to a thickness of approximately 8 um to achieve a defect density of approximately 4×107 cm−2.


In a particular embodiment, the device layer 380 may have a larger lattice constant material than the buffer layer 340. For example, wherein buffer layer 340 comprises GaSb with a lattice constant of approximately 6.09 Å, the device layer 380 may comprise InSb, which has a lattice constant of approximately 6.48 Å. In such an embodiment, the GaSb buffer layer 340 may induce a compressive stress into the larger lattice constant InSb device layer 380. The larger lattice constant InSb device layer 380 will retain the strain up until the device layer 380 reaches its critical thickness. Beyond the critical thickness, a lattice mismatched layer will relax, thus reducing strain. In one embodiment, an InSb device layer 380 grown at less than 410 C. will have a critical thickness of approximately 100 Å.


In another embodiment, the device layer 380 may have a smaller lattice constant than the buffer layer 340. For example, wherein the buffer layer 340 comprises GaSb with a lattice constant of approximately 6.09 Å, the device layer 380 may be comprised of a smaller lattice constant material such as InxGa1-xAs (x˜0.7, ˜5.9 Å), InAs (6.06 Å), or InP (5.87 Å). In such an embodiment, a strained device layer 380 may be detrimental to device performance. For example, a tensilely strained device layer 380 may be prone to cracking, thus introducing detrimental defects. In an embodiment, where the device layer 380 has a smaller lattice constant than the buffer layer 340, the buffer layer 340 may have a maximum thickness of less than approximately 0.3 um in order to reduce the amount of strain being induced in the device layer 380.



FIGS. 4A-4C depict embodiments of methods to fabricate a quantum well transistor in a III-V device layer on a substrate incorporating embodiments of the III-V buffer architecture discussed. FIG. 4A shows device layer 480 comprising a quantum well 483 between an upper barrier layer 485 and a lower barrier layer 481 formed upon the buffer 440 over silicon substrate 410.


Generally, the lower barrier layer 481 is formed of a higher band gap material than the overlying quantum well 483. The lower barrier layer 481 is of sufficient thickness to provide a potential barrier to charge carriers in the transistor channel. In a particular embodiment, the lower barrier layer thickness is between about 100 Å and about 250 Å. In other embodiments, the lower barrier is InAlSb between 2500 Å and 3000 Å thick. In still other embodiments, lower barrier layer 481 is microns thick to further reduce defect density in the quantum well 483. In certain embodiments wherein the buffer 440 is comprised of a GaSb, the lower barrier layer 481 is comprised of aluminum indium antimonide (AlxIn1-xSb). In a particular embodiment, the lower barrier layer 481 is AlxIn1-xSb with 15% aluminum. In certain other embodiments wherein the buffer 440 comprises GaAs, the lower barrier layer 481 is comprised of indium aluminum arsenide (InAlAs).


Then, over the lower barrier layer 481, a quantum well 483 is formed of a material with a smaller band gap than that of the lower barrier. In an embodiment wherein the buffer 440 comprises GaSb, the quantum well 483 is doped or undoped and formed of InSb. In another embodiment wherein the buffer 440 comprises GaAs, the quantum well 483 is doped or undoped and formed of indium gallium arsenide (InxGa1-xAs) or InAs, as two examples. Quantum well 483 is of a sufficient thickness to provide adequate channel conductance. In certain embodiments, the thickness of the quantum well 483 is between about 50 Å and about 300 Å.


Over the quantum well 483 is the upper barrier layer 485. Upper barrier layer 485 has a larger band gap than the quantum well 483, thereby confining a majority of charge carriers within the quantum well 483 for reduced device leakage. The upper barrier layer 485 may be formed of the same or different materials as the lower barrier layer 481. In certain embodiments wherein the buffer 440 comprises GaSb, the upper barrier layer 485 comprises aluminum indium antimonide (AlxIn1-xSb). In a particular embodiment, the upper barrier layer 485 is AlxIn1-xSb with 15% aluminum. In certain other embodiments, wherein the buffer 440 comprises GaAs, the upper barrier layer 485 comprises indium aluminum arsenide (InAlAs). The upper barrier layer 485 may include a delta-doped layer (not shown) to supply carriers for embodiments where the lower quantum well is undoped (optionally the lower barrier 481 may be similarly doped to supply carriers). For an n-type device utilizing an AlxIn1-xSb upper barrier 485, the delta doping may be done using silicon (Si) or tellurium (Te) impurities, as two examples. The upper barrier layer 485 may have various thicknesses and in certain embodiments the upper barrier layer 485 is between about 40 Å and 400 Å thick.


Finally, to complete device layer 480 as shown in FIG. 4A, a highly-doped source drain layer 486 is formed above the upper barrier layer 485. In a particular embodiment, the source drain layer 486 is n+ doped InSb between about 30 Å to about 300 Å thick.


As shown in FIG. 4B, source and drain contact metallizations 487 are then formed by commonly known deposition processes, such as electron beam evaporation or reactive sputtering. In various embodiments, as shown in FIG. 4B, a mask material 489 is used to selectively remove a portion of the semiconductor device stack in preparation for the placement of the gate electrode. Depending on whether a depletion mode or enhancement mode device is desired, selective etches may be used to form a recess having a particular depth. In particular embodiments, source drain layer 486 is removed during the gate recess etch to expose a suitable Schottky surface on the upper barrier layer 485. Commonly known dry or wet etch techniques may be utilized to form the gate recess. The etchant may be selective to the composition of the semiconductor, for example, in an embodiment, an n+ doped indium antimonide (InSb) source drain layer 486 is selectively removed using a wet etch process comprised of citric acid and peroxide. Through application of similar commonly known selective etch techniques, the recess etch depth may be tightly controlled by terminating on a stop layer grown upon the upper barrier layer 485 (not shown).


As shown in FIG. 4C, the gate electrode 488 is formed over the upper barrier layer 485. In some embodiments of the present invention, commonly known techniques are used to form the gate electrode 488 directly on the upper barrier layer 485, thereby creating Schottky junction through which the gate controls the quantum well 483. In other embodiments, commonly known techniques are used to form the gate electrode 488 on a dielectric layer over the upper barrier layer 485, thereby creating a MOS junction. In particular embodiments, the gate electrode 488 is formed using commonly known lift-off methods relying on lithography and highly directional deposition techniques, such as electron beam deposition, to separate the gate electrode 488 from the source drain layer 486.


Then, as shown in FIG. 4C, the quantum well transistor 490 is isolated using commonly known techniques. In particular embodiments, the epitaxial device layer of the quantum well transistor 490 is etched through to form an active device mesa upon the buffer 440 over silicon substrate 410. The isolation etch removes the source drain layer 486, upper barrier 485, quantum well 483 and lower barrier 481 along a perimeter of the active device to form the mesa. This enables device isolation to be achieved with minimal topography. With the quantum well transistor 490 substantially complete, backend processing is performed using commonly known techniques to connect quantum well transistor 490 to the external environment.


Although the present invention has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. The specific features and acts disclosed are instead to be understood as particularly graceful implementations of the claimed invention useful for illustrating the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method of forming a semiconductor structure comprising: depositing a nucleation layer comprising Ga and Sb using migration enhanced epitaxy (MEE) at a first growth temperature and first growth rate of approximately 0.1 um/hr on a surface of a silicon substrate,depositing a buffer layer consisting essentially of GaSb at a second growth temperature and second growth rate on the nucleation layer; andforming a compound semiconductor device layer directly on the buffer layer;wherein the second growth temperature is higher than the first growth temperature.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the surface is a (100) surface of the silicon substrate off-cut at an angle between 2 and 12 degrees towards a [110] direction.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the surface is off-cut from a plane selected from the group consisting of: (211), (511), (711), (013).
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the compound semiconductor device layer upon the buffer layer further comprises depositing InSb at a growth temperature between approximately 300° C. and 500° C.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the surface of the silicon substrate upon which the nucleation layer is deposited is a vicinal surface comprising terraces, and wherein depositing the nucleation layer includes depositing alternating monolayers of Sb and Ga until the nucleation layer is sufficiently thick to fill substantially all the terraces of the vicinal surface.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first growth temperature is between approximately 300° C. and 600° C.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the second growth temperature is approximately 510° C.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein depositing the nucleation layer comprising Ga and Sb using migration enhanced epitaxy (MEE) comprises iterations of the following sequence: exposing the substrate to a Sb source, shuttering the Sb source, applying an approximately 60 second hold time in which both the Sb source and a Ga source are shuttered, exposing the substrate to the Ga source, shuttering the Ga source, and applying no hold time in which both the Sb source and the Ga source are shuttered.
  • 9. A method of forming a compound semiconductor device layer on a silicon substrate comprising: depositing GaSb upon a surface of the silicon substrate using migration enhanced epitaxy (MEE) at a first growth temperature and first growth rate of approximately 0.1 um/hr to form a GaSb nucleation layer, wherein the surface of the silicon substrate is off-cut from a (100) surface at an angle between 2 and 12 degrees toward a [110] direction;depositing GaSb upon the GaSb nucleation layer at a second growth temperature and second growth rate to form a GaSb buffer layer, wherein the second growth temperature is higher than the first growth temperature; anddepositing an InSb device layer directly on the GaSb buffer layer.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein depositing GaSb upon the surface of the silicon substrate using migration enhanced epitaxy (MEE) at the first growth temperature and first growth rate to form the GaSb nucleation layer comprises iterations of the following sequence: exposing the silicon substrate to a Sb source, shuttering the Sb source, applying an approximately 60 second hold time in which both the Sb source and a Ga source are shuttered, exposing the silicon substrate to the Ga source, shuttering the Ga source, and applying no hold time in which both the Sb source and the Ga source are shuttered.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/498,901 filed on Aug. 2, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,143,646 which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (491)
Number Name Date Kind
4231149 Chapman et al. Nov 1980 A
4487652 Almgren Dec 1984 A
4711701 McLevige Dec 1987 A
4751201 Nottenburg et al. Jun 1988 A
4818715 Chao Apr 1989 A
4871692 Lee et al. Oct 1989 A
4872046 Morkoc et al. Oct 1989 A
4905063 Beltram et al. Feb 1990 A
4906589 Chao Mar 1990 A
4907048 Huang Mar 1990 A
4914059 Nissim et al. Apr 1990 A
4994873 Madan Feb 1991 A
4996574 Shirasaki et al. Feb 1991 A
5023203 Choi Jun 1991 A
5120666 Gotou Jun 1992 A
5124777 Lee Jun 1992 A
5141893 Ito et al. Aug 1992 A
5144378 Hikosaka Sep 1992 A
5179037 Seabaugh Jan 1993 A
5216271 Takagi et al. Jun 1993 A
5278102 Horie Jan 1994 A
5308999 Gotou May 1994 A
5328810 Lowrey et al. Jul 1994 A
5338959 Kim et al. Aug 1994 A
5346836 Manning et al. Sep 1994 A
5346839 Sundaresan Sep 1994 A
5357119 Wang et al. Oct 1994 A
5391506 Tada et al. Feb 1995 A
5428237 Yuzurihara et al. Jun 1995 A
5466621 Hisamoto et al. Nov 1995 A
5475869 Gomi et al. Dec 1995 A
5479033 Baca et al. Dec 1995 A
5482877 Rhee Jan 1996 A
5495115 Kudo et al. Feb 1996 A
5514885 Myrick May 1996 A
5521859 Ema et al. May 1996 A
5543351 Hirai et al. Aug 1996 A
5545586 Koh Aug 1996 A
5563077 Ha Oct 1996 A
5576227 Hsu Nov 1996 A
5578513 Maegawa Nov 1996 A
5595919 Pan Jan 1997 A
5595941 Okarnoto et al. Jan 1997 A
5652454 Iwamatsu et al. Jul 1997 A
5658806 Lin et al. Aug 1997 A
5665203 Lee et al. Sep 1997 A
5682048 Shinohara et al. Oct 1997 A
5698869 Yoshimi et al. Dec 1997 A
5701016 Burroughes et al. Dec 1997 A
5716879 Choi et al. Feb 1998 A
5739544 Yuki et al. Apr 1998 A
5760442 Shigyo et al. Jun 1998 A
5770513 Okaniwa Jun 1998 A
5773331 Solomon et al. Jun 1998 A
5776821 Haskell et al. Jul 1998 A
5793088 Choi et al. Aug 1998 A
5804848 Mukai Sep 1998 A
5811324 Yang Sep 1998 A
5814895 Hirayama et al. Sep 1998 A
5821629 Wen et al. Oct 1998 A
5827769 Aminzadeh et al. Oct 1998 A
5838029 Shakuda Nov 1998 A
5844278 Mizuno et al. Dec 1998 A
5856225 Lee et al. Jan 1999 A
5859456 Efland et al. Jan 1999 A
5880015 Hata Mar 1999 A
5883564 Partin Mar 1999 A
5888309 Yu Mar 1999 A
5889304 Watanabe Mar 1999 A
5899710 Mukai May 1999 A
5905285 Gardner et al. May 1999 A
5908313 Chau et al. Jun 1999 A
5952701 Bulucea Sep 1999 A
5965914 Miyamoto Oct 1999 A
5976767 Li Nov 1999 A
5981400 Lo Nov 1999 A
5985726 Yu et al. Nov 1999 A
6013926 Oku et al. Jan 2000 A
6018176 Lim Jan 2000 A
6031249 Yamazaki et al. Feb 2000 A
6051452 Shigyo et al. Apr 2000 A
6054355 Inumiya et al. Apr 2000 A
6063675 Rodder May 2000 A
6063677 Rodder et al. May 2000 A
6066869 Noble et al. May 2000 A
6087208 Krivokapic et al. Jul 2000 A
6093621 Tseng Jul 2000 A
6114201 Wu Sep 2000 A
6114206 Yu Sep 2000 A
6117697 Seaford et al. Sep 2000 A
6117741 Chatterjee et al. Sep 2000 A
6120846 Hintermaier et al. Sep 2000 A
6133593 Boos et al. Oct 2000 A
6144072 Iwamatsu et al. Nov 2000 A
6150222 Gardner et al. Nov 2000 A
6153485 Pey et al. Nov 2000 A
6163053 Kawashima Dec 2000 A
6165880 Yaung et al. Dec 2000 A
6174820 Habermehl et al. Jan 2001 B1
6190975 Kubo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200865 Gardner et al. Mar 2001 B1
6218309 Miller et al. Apr 2001 B1
6251729 Montree et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251763 Inumiya et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252262 Jonker et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259135 Hsu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261921 Yen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262456 Yu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274503 Hsieh Aug 2001 B1
6287924 Chao et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294416 Wu Sep 2001 B1
6307235 Forbes et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310367 Yagishita et al. Oct 2001 B1
6319807 Yeh et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320212 Chow Nov 2001 B1
6335251 Miyano et al. Jan 2002 B2
6358800 Tseng Mar 2002 B1
6359311 Colinge et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362111 Laaksonen et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368923 Huang Apr 2002 B1
6376317 Forbes et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383882 Lee et al. May 2002 B1
6387820 Sanderfer May 2002 B1
6391782 Yu May 2002 B1
6396108 Krivokapic et al. May 2002 B1
6399970 Kubo et al. Jun 2002 B2
6403434 Yu Jun 2002 B1
6403981 Yu Jun 2002 B1
6406795 Hwang et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407442 Inoue et al. Jun 2002 B2
6413802 Hu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6413877 Annapragada Jul 2002 B1
6424015 Ishibashi et al. Jul 2002 B1
6437550 Andoh et al. Aug 2002 B2
6458662 Yu Oct 2002 B1
6459123 Enders et al. Oct 2002 B1
6465290 Suguro et al. Oct 2002 B1
6472258 Adkisson et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475869 Yu Nov 2002 B1
6475890 Yu Nov 2002 B1
6479866 Xiang Nov 2002 B1
6483146 Lee et al. Nov 2002 B2
6483151 Wakabayashi et al. Nov 2002 B2
6483156 Adkisson et al. Nov 2002 B1
6495403 Skotnicki Dec 2002 B1
6498096 Bruce et al. Dec 2002 B2
6500767 Chiou et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501141 Leu Dec 2002 B1
6506692 Andideh Jan 2003 B2
6525403 Inaba et al. Feb 2003 B2
6526996 Chang et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534807 Mandelman et al. Mar 2003 B2
6537862 Song Mar 2003 B2
6537885 Kang et al. Mar 2003 B1
6537901 Cha et al. Mar 2003 B2
6541829 Nishinohara et al. Apr 2003 B2
6555879 Krivokapic et al. Apr 2003 B1
6562665 Yu May 2003 B1
6562687 Deleonibus May 2003 B1
6566734 Sugihara et al. May 2003 B2
6583469 Fried et al. Jun 2003 B1
6605498 Murthy et al. Aug 2003 B1
6607948 Sugiyama Aug 2003 B1
6610576 Nowak Aug 2003 B2
6611029 Ahmed et al. Aug 2003 B1
6630388 Sekigawa et al. Oct 2003 B2
6635909 Clark et al. Oct 2003 B2
6642090 Fried et al. Nov 2003 B1
6642114 Nakamura Nov 2003 B2
6645797 Buynoski et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645826 Yamazaki et al. Nov 2003 B2
6645861 Cabral et al. Nov 2003 B2
6656853 Ito Dec 2003 B2
6657259 Fried et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660598 Hanafi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664160 Park et al. Dec 2003 B2
6680240 Maszara Jan 2004 B1
6686231 Ahmed et al. Feb 2004 B1
6689650 Gambino et al. Feb 2004 B2
6693324 Maegawa et al. Feb 2004 B2
6696366 Morey et al. Feb 2004 B1
6706571 Yu et al. Mar 2004 B1
6709982 Buynoski et al. Mar 2004 B1
6713396 Anthony Mar 2004 B2
6716684 Krivokapic et al. Apr 2004 B1
6716686 Buynoski et al. Apr 2004 B1
6716690 Wang et al. Apr 2004 B1
6730964 Horiuchi May 2004 B2
6744103 Snyder Jun 2004 B2
6756657 Zhang et al. Jun 2004 B1
6762469 Mocuta et al. Jul 2004 B2
6764884 Yu et al. Jul 2004 B1
6770516 Wu et al. Aug 2004 B2
6774390 Sugiyama et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784071 Chen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784076 Gonzalez et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787402 Yu Sep 2004 B1
6787439 Ahmed et al. Sep 2004 B2
6787845 Deleonibus Sep 2004 B2
6787854 Yang et al. Sep 2004 B1
6790733 Natzle et al. Sep 2004 B1
6794313 Chang Sep 2004 B1
6794718 Nowak et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798000 Luyken et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800885 An et al. Oct 2004 B1
6800910 Lin et al. Oct 2004 B2
6803631 Dakshina-Murthy et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812075 Fried et al. Nov 2004 B2
6812111 Cheong et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815277 Fried et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821834 Ando Nov 2004 B2
6825506 Chau et al. Nov 2004 B2
6830998 Pan et al. Dec 2004 B1
6833588 Yu et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835614 Hanafi et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835618 Dakshina-Murthy et al. Dec 2004 B1
6838322 Pham et al. Jan 2005 B2
6844238 Yeo et al. Jan 2005 B2
6849556 Takahashi Feb 2005 B2
6849884 Clark et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852559 Kwak et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855606 Chen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855990 Yeo et al. Feb 2005 B2
6858478 Chau et al. Feb 2005 B2
6864540 Divakaruni et al. Mar 2005 B1
6867433 Yeo et al. Mar 2005 B2
6867460 Anderson et al. Mar 2005 B1
6869868 Chiu et al. Mar 2005 B2
6869898 Inaki et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870226 Maeda et al. Mar 2005 B2
6884154 Mizushima et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885055 Lee Apr 2005 B2
6891234 Connelly et al. May 2005 B1
6897527 Dakshina-Murthy et al. May 2005 B2
6902962 Yeo et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909151 Hareland et al. Jun 2005 B2
6919238 Bohr Jul 2005 B2
6921691 Li et al. Jul 2005 B1
6921702 Ahn et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921963 Krivokapic et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921982 Joshi et al. Jul 2005 B2
6924190 Dennison Aug 2005 B2
6955961 Chung Oct 2005 B1
6960517 Rios et al. Nov 2005 B2
6967351 Fried et al. Nov 2005 B2
6974738 Hareland et al. Dec 2005 B2
6975014 Krivokapic et al. Dec 2005 B1
6977415 Matsuo Dec 2005 B2
6998301 Yu et al. Feb 2006 B1
6998318 Park Feb 2006 B2
7013447 Mathew et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018551 Beintner et al. Mar 2006 B2
7045401 Lee et al. May 2006 B2
7045407 Keating et al. May 2006 B2
7045441 Chang et al. May 2006 B2
7056794 Ku et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060539 Chidambarrao et al. Jun 2006 B2
7061055 Sekigawa et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071064 Doyle et al. Jul 2006 B2
7074623 Lochtefeld et al. Jul 2006 B2
7084018 Ahmed et al. Aug 2006 B1
7105390 Brask et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105891 Visokay Sep 2006 B2
7105894 Yeo et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105934 Anderson et al. Sep 2006 B2
7112478 Grupp et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115945 Lee et al. Oct 2006 B2
7119402 Kinoshita et al. Oct 2006 B2
7122463 Ohuchi Oct 2006 B2
7141856 Lee et al. Nov 2006 B2
7154118 Lindert Dec 2006 B2
7163851 Abadeer et al. Jan 2007 B2
7163898 Mariani et al. Jan 2007 B2
7183137 Lee et al. Feb 2007 B2
7187043 Arai et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202503 Chow et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214991 Yeo et al. May 2007 B2
7235822 Li Jun 2007 B2
7238564 Ko et al. Jul 2007 B2
7241653 Hareland et al. Jul 2007 B2
7247547 Zhu et al. Jul 2007 B2
7250645 Wang et al. Jul 2007 B1
7291886 Doris et al. Nov 2007 B2
7339241 Orlowski et al. Mar 2008 B2
7348284 Doyle et al. Mar 2008 B2
7348642 Nowak Mar 2008 B2
7354817 Watanabe et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358121 Chau et al. Apr 2008 B2
7396730 Li Jul 2008 B2
7452778 Chen et al. Nov 2008 B2
7456471 Anderson et al. Nov 2008 B2
7456476 Hareland et al. Nov 2008 B2
7479421 Kavalieros et al. Jan 2009 B2
7485503 Brask et al. Feb 2009 B2
7573059 Hudait et al. Aug 2009 B2
7585734 Kang et al. Sep 2009 B2
7612416 Takeuchi et al. Nov 2009 B2
7655989 Zhu et al. Feb 2010 B2
7701018 Yamagami et al. Apr 2010 B2
20010019886 Bruce et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010026985 Kim et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010040907 Chakrabarti Nov 2001 A1
20020011612 Hieda Jan 2002 A1
20020036290 Inaba et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020037619 Sugihara et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048918 Grider et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020058374 Kim et al. May 2002 A1
20020074614 Furuta et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020081794 Ito Jun 2002 A1
20020093332 Schroeder et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020096724 Liang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020142529 Matsuda et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020149031 Kim et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020160553 Yamanaka et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020166838 Nagarajan Nov 2002 A1
20020167007 Yamazaki et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177263 Hanafi et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177282 Song Nov 2002 A1
20020185655 Fahimulla et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030036290 Hsieh et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030042542 Maegawa et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030057477 Hergenrother et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030057486 Gambino et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030067017 Ieong et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030080332 Phillips May 2003 A1
20030085194 Hopkins, Jr. May 2003 A1
20030098479 Murthy et al. May 2003 A1
20030098488 O'Keeffe et al. May 2003 A1
20030102497 Fried et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030102518 Fried et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030111686 Nowak Jun 2003 A1
20030122186 Sekigawa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030143791 Cheong et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030151077 Mathew et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030174534 Clark et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030190766 Gonzalez et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030201458 Clark et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030203636 Anthony Oct 2003 A1
20030227036 Sugiyama Dec 2003 A1
20040016968 Coronel et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040029345 Deleonibus et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040029393 Ying et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040031979 Lochtefeld et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040033639 Chinn et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040036118 Abadeer et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040036126 Chau et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040036127 Chau et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038436 Mori et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038533 Liang Feb 2004 A1
20040061178 Lin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040063286 Kim et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040070020 Fujiwara et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075149 Fitzgerald et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040082125 Hou Apr 2004 A1
20040092062 Ahmed et al. May 2004 A1
20040092067 Hanafi et al. May 2004 A1
20040094807 Chau et al. May 2004 A1
20040099903 Yeo et al. May 2004 A1
20040099966 Chau et al. May 2004 A1
20040108523 Chen et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040108558 Kwak et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040110097 Ahmed et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040113181 Wicker Jun 2004 A1
20040119100 Nowak et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040124492 Matsuo Jul 2004 A1
20040126975 Ahmed et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040132236 Doris Jul 2004 A1
20040145000 An et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145019 Dakshina-Murthy et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040166642 Chen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169221 Ko et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040169269 Yeo et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040180491 Arai et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040191980 Rios et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040195624 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040198003 Yeo et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040203254 Conley et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209463 Kim et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040217420 Yeo et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040219722 Pham et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040219780 Ohuchi Nov 2004 A1
20040222473 Risaki Nov 2004 A1
20040227187 Cheng et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040238887 Nihey Dec 2004 A1
20040238915 Chen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040256647 Lee et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262683 Bohr et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262699 Rios et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050019993 Lee et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050020020 Collaert et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050035415 Yeo et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050040429 Uppal Feb 2005 A1
20050040444 Cohen Feb 2005 A1
20050059214 Cheng et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050062082 Bucher et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050073060 Datta et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093028 Chambers May 2005 A1
20050093067 Yeo et al. May 2005 A1
20050093075 Bentum et al. May 2005 A1
20050093154 Kottantharayil et al. May 2005 A1
20050104055 Kwak et al. May 2005 A1
20050110082 Cheng et al. May 2005 A1
20050116289 Boyd et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050118790 Lee et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050127362 Zhang et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050127632 Gehret Jun 2005 A1
20050133829 Kunii et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050133866 Chau et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136584 Boyanov et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050139860 Snyder et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050145894 Chau et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050145941 Bedell et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050145944 Murthy et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050148131 Brask Jul 2005 A1
20050148137 Brask et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050153494 Ku et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156171 Brask et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156202 Rhee et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156227 Jeng Jul 2005 A1
20050161739 Anderson et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050162928 Rosmeulen Jul 2005 A1
20050167766 Yagishita Aug 2005 A1
20050170593 Kang et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050184316 Kim Aug 2005 A1
20050189583 Kim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050199919 Liu Sep 2005 A1
20050202604 Cheng et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050215014 Ahn et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050215022 Adam et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050224797 Ko et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050224800 Lindert et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050227498 Furukawa Oct 2005 A1
20050230763 Huang et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050233156 Senzaki Oct 2005 A1
20050239252 Ahn et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050255642 Liu et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050266645 Park Dec 2005 A1
20050272192 Oh et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277294 Schaeffer et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050280121 Doris et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050287752 Nouri et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060014338 Doris et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060040054 Pearlstein et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060043500 Chen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060046521 Vaartstra et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060063469 Talieh et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068591 Radosavljevic et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071299 Doyle et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060086977 Shah et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060148182 Datta et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060154478 Hsu et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060170066 Mathew et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060172480 Wang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060172497 Hareland et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060180859 Radosavljevic et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060202270 Son et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060204898 Gutsche et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060205164 Ko et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060211184 Boyd et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060220131 Kinoshita et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060227595 Chuang et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240622 Lee et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060244066 Yeo et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060263699 Abatchev et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060281325 Chou et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070001219 Radosavljevic et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070023795 Nagano et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070029624 Nowak Feb 2007 A1
20070045735 Orlowski et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070045748 Booth, Jr. et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070048930 Figura et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070052041 Sorada et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070069302 Jin Mar 2007 A1
20070090416 Doyle Apr 2007 A1
20070093010 Mathew et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070108514 Inoue et al. May 2007 A1
20070187682 Takeuchi et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070241414 Narihiro Oct 2007 A1
20070262389 Chau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080017890 Yuan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080017934 Kim et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080032478 Hudait et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080111163 Russ et al. May 2008 A1
20080116515 Gossner et al. May 2008 A1
20080128797 Dyer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080212392 Bauer Sep 2008 A1
20080237655 Nakabayashi et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080258207 Radosavljevic et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090061572 Hareland et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090099181 Wurster et al. Apr 2009 A1
20100200923 Chen et al. Aug 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
10203998 Aug 2003 DE
0 265 314 Apr 1988 EP
0 469 604 Feb 1992 EP
0 474 952 Mar 1992 EP
0510667 Oct 1992 EP
0623963 Nov 1994 EP
1091413 Apr 2001 EP
1202335 May 2002 EP
1566844 Aug 2005 EP
2156149 Oct 1985 GB
56073454 Jun 1981 JP
59145538 Aug 1984 JP
2303048 Dec 1990 JP
05 090252 Apr 1993 JP
06005856 Jan 1994 JP
06 132521 May 1994 JP
6151387 May 1994 JP
406177089 Jun 1994 JP
06224440 Aug 1994 JP
9162301 Jun 1997 JP
20037842 Feb 2000 JP
2000037842 Feb 2000 JP
2001-189453 Jul 2001 JP
2001338987 Dec 2001 JP
20022298051 Oct 2002 JP
2003298051 Oct 2003 JP
2005085916 Mar 2005 JP
200414538 Aug 1992 TW
200518310 Nov 1992 TW
516232 Jan 2003 TW
561530 Jan 2003 TW
548799 Aug 2003 TW
200402872 Feb 2004 TW
200405408 Apr 2004 TW
200417034 Sep 2004 TW
WO 9106976 May 1991 WO
WO0243151 May 2002 WO
WO02095814 Nov 2002 WO
WO03003442 Jan 2003 WO
WO2004059726 Jul 2004 WO
WO2005036651 Apr 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (93)
Entry
Yano et al., “Time-resolved reflection high energy electron diffraction analysis for atomic layer depositions of GaSb by molecular beam epitaxy”, Journal of Crystal Growth 146 (1995) pp. 349-353.
A. Wan et al., Characterization of GaAs grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy on Vicinal Ge (100) Substrates. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22(4) Jul./Aug. 2004, pp. 1893-1897.
Akaha et al., JP2005-85916, Mar. 31, 2005, Machine translation in English, 11 pages.
Ashley, et al., “Novel InSb-based Quantum Well Transistors for Ultra-High Speed, Low Power Logic Applications,” Solid-State and Integrated Circuits Technology, 7th International Conference on, Beijing 2004, IEEE vol. 3, 4 Pages.
Balakrishnan et al., “Room-temperature optically-pumped GaSb quantum well based VCSEL monolithically grown on Si (100) substrate,” Electronic Letters, vol. 42, No. 6, Mar. 16, 2006, 2 pages.
Intel Corporation Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,901 mailed Nov. 23, 2011.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,901 mailed Jun. 23, 2011.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,901 mailed Sep. 1, 2010.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,901 mailed Mar. 26, 2010.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,901 mailed Dec. 17, 2009.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,901 mailed Jun. 8, 2009.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,901 mailed Nov. 17, 2008.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,901 mailed Aug. 1, 2008.
Intel Corporation Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/915,557 mailed Jun. 9, 2011.
Intel Corporation Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,685 mailed Aug. 6, 2010.
Intel Corporation Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,253 mailed Apr. 7, 2009.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,685 mailed Nov. 24, 2009.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/498,685 mailed May 26, 2010.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,253 mailed Dec. 12, 2008.
Intel Corporation Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,253 mailed May 14, 2008.
M. Doczy et al., US Patent Application, Extreme High Mobility CMOS Logic, U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,452, Dec. 15, 2005.
M. Mori et al. Heteroepitaxial growth of InSb films on a Si(001) substrate via AlSb buffer layer, Applied Surface Science 216 (2003) ppp. 569-574.
Nguyen et al., “Growth of heteroepitaxial GaSb thn films on Si (100) substrates,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 19, No. 8, Aug. 2004, pp. 2315-2321.
R.M. Sieg et al., Toward device-quality GaAs Growth by Molecular Beam Epitaxy on Offcut Ge/SiGe/Si substrates, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 16(3) May/Jun. 1998, pp. 1471-1474.
S. Scholz et al., MOVPE Growth of GaAs on Ge Substrates by Inserting a Thin Low Temperature Buffer Layer, Cryst. Res. Technol. 41, No. 2 (2006), pp. 111-116.
Uchida et al., “Reduction of dislocation density by thermal annealing for GaAs/GaSb/Si heterostructure,” Journal of Crystal Growth, 150, 1995, pp. 681-684.
T. Ashley et al., “High-Speed, Low-Pressure InSb Transistors”, 1997 IEEE, IEDM 97-751, pp. 30.4.1-30.4.4.
Ashley et al. “InSb-Based Quantum Well Transistors for High Speed, Low Power Applications”, QinetiQ, Malvern Technology Center and Intel (2004), 2 pages.
Bednyi et al. “Electronic State of the Surface of INP Modified by Treatment in Sulfur Vapor” Soviet Physics Semiconductors, Am. Inst. of Physics, New York, vol. 26, No. 8, Aug. 1, 1992.
V.N. Bessolov et al., “Chalcogenide Passivation of III-V Semiconductor Surfaces”, 1998 American Institute of Physics, Semiconductors 32 (11), Nov. 1998.
Buchanan, D.A. “Fabrication of Midgap Metal Gates Compatible with Ultrathin Dielectrics”, Applied Physics Letters 73.12 (1998), pp. 1676-1678.
Chau, R., “Advanced Metal Gate/High-K Dielectric Stacks for High-Performance CMOS Transistors”, Proceedings of AVS 5th International Conference of Microelectronics and Interfaces, Mar. 2004, (3 pgs.).
Claflin, B. “Interface Studies of Tungsten Nitride and Titanium Nitride Composite Metal Gate Electrodes with Thin Dielectric Layers”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, A 16.3 (1998), pp. 1757-1761.
Datta et al. “85mm Gate Length Enhancement and Depletion Mode InSb Quantum Well Transistors for Ultra High Speed and Very Low Power Digital Logic Applications” IEEE Dec. 5, 2005, pp. 763-766.
Datta, et al., U.S. Patent Application “Extreme High Mobility CMOS Logic” U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,452, filed Dec. 15, 2005.
Frank et al., HfO2 and Al2O3 Dielectrics GaAs Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, Issue 15, id. 152904, 2005, 1 page.
C. Gonzalez et al., “Selenium Passivation of GaAs(001): A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study”, Institute of Physics Publishing, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 (2004), pp. 2187-2206.
Hwang, Jeong-Mo, “Novel Polysilicon/TiN Stacked Gate Structure for Fully Depleted SOI/CMOS”, International Electronic Devices Meeting Technical Digest (1992), pp. 345-348.
H.W. Jang et al. “Incorporation of Oxygen Donors in AlGaN”, J. Electronchem Soc. 152, pp. G536-G540, (2004).
Jin, B. et al., “Mobility Enhancement in Compressively Strained SIGE Surface Channel PMOS Transistors with HF02/TIN Gate Stack”, Proceedings of the First Joint International Symposium, 206th Meeting of Electrochemical Society, Oct. 2004, pp. 111-122.
B.A. Kuruvilla et al., “Passivation of GaAs (100) using Selenium Sulfide”, 1993 American Institute of Physics, J. Appl. Phys. 73 (9), May 1, 1993, pp. 4384-4387.
D. Mistele et al., “Incorporation of Dielectric Layers into the Processing of 111-Nitride-Based Heterostructure Field-Effect Transistors”, Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 32, No. 5, 2003, pp. 355-363.
Nowak, Edward J. et al., “Turning Silicon on Its Edge,” IEEE Circuits & Devices Magazine, vol. 1, (Jan./Feb. 2004), pp. 20-31.
K.Y. Park et al., “Device Charateristics of AlGaN/GaN MIS-HFET Using Al2O3-HfO2 Laminated High-k Dielectric”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 43, No. 11A, 2004, pp. L1433-L1435.
Passlack et al., “Self-Aligned GaAs p-Channel Enhancement Mode MOS Heterostructure Field-Effect Transistor”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, No. 9, Sep. 2002, pp. 508-510.
PCT Search Report PCT/US2006/044601, Mar. 19, 2007, 7 pages.
T. Sugizaki et al., “Novel Multi-bit SONOS Type Flash Memory Using a High-k Charge Trapping Layer” 2003 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 27-28.
Kuo, Charles , et al., A Capacitorless Double-Gate DRAM Cell Design for High Density Applications, IEEE, 2002, 4 pgs.
Kuo, Charles , et al., “A Capacitorless Double Gate DRAM Technology for Sub-100-nm Embedded and Stand-Alone Memory Applications”, IEEE 50(12):, (2003), 2408-2416.
Ludwig, et al., FinFET Technology for Future Microprocessors, IEEE Int'l. SOI Conference, New Port Beach, CA, Sep. 29-Oct. 2, 2003, 2 pgs.
Martel, Richard , et al., “Carbon Nanotube Field Effect Transistors for Logic Applications”, IEEE 2001, 4 pgs.
Mayer, T. M., et al., “Chemical Vapor Deposition of Flouroalkylsilane Monolayer Films for Adhesion Control in Microelectromechanical Systems”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 18(5), 2000, 8 pgs.
Nackaerts, et al., “A 0.314um2 6T-SRAM Cell build with Tall Triple-Gate Devices for 45nm node applications using 0.75NA 193nm lithography”, IEEE, 2004, 4 pgs.
Nowak, E. J., et al., “A Functional FinFET-DGCMOS SRAM Cell”, Int'l Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA Dec. 8-11, 2002, 4 pgs.
Nowak, E. J., et al., “Scaling Beyond the 65 nm Node with FinFET-DGCMOS”, IEEE CICC, San Jose, CA Sep. 21-24, 2003, 4 pgs.
Ohsawa, Takashi , et al., “Memory Design Using a One-Transistor Gain Cell on SOI”, IEEE 37(11), Nov. 2002, 13 pgs.
Park, Donggun , et al., 3-dimensional nano-CMOS Transistors to Overcome Scaling Limits, IEEE 2004ISBN 0-7803-8511-X, 6 pgs.
Park, Jae-Hyoun , et al., Quantum-Wired MOSFET Photodetector Fabricated by Conventional Photolighography on SOI Substrate, Nanotechnology, 4th IEEE Conference on Munich Germany, Aug. 16-19, 2004, Piscataway, NJ, 3 pgs.
Park, T. , et al., “Fabrication of Body-Tied FinFETs (Omega MOSFETS) Using Bulk Si Wafers”, 2003 Symposia on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, (Jun. 2003), pp. 135-136.
Park, Jong-Tae , et al., “Pi-Gate SOI MOSFET”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 8, Aug. 2001, 2 pgs.
Park, T. , et al., “PMOS Body-Tied FinFET (Omega MOSFET) Characteristics”, IEEE Device Research Conference, Piscataway, NJ, Jun. 23-25, 2003, 2 pgs.
Seevinck, Evert , et al., Static-Noise Margin Analysis of MOS SRAM Cells, IEEE, (SC-22)5, Oct. 1987, 7 pgs.
Stadele, M. , et al., A Comprehensive Study of Corner Effects in Tri-gate Transistors, IEEE 2004, 4 pgs.
Stolk, Peter A., et al., Device Modeling Statistical Dopant Fluctuations in MOS Transistors, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, (45)9, 1997, 4 pgs.
Subramanian, V. , “A Bulk-Si-Compatible Ultrathin-body SOI Technology for Sub-100m MOSFETS”, Proceeding of the 57th Annual Device Research Conference, (1999), pp. 28-29.
Tanaka, T. , et al., Scalability Study on a Capacitorless IT-DRAM: From Single-gate PD-SOI to Double-gate FinDRAM, IEEE, 2004, 4 pgs.
Tang, Stephen H., et al., FinFET—A Quasi-Planar Double-Gate MOSFET, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 6, 2001, 3 pgs.
Tokoro, Kenji , et al., Anisotropic Etching Properties of Silicon in KOH and TMAH Solutions, International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, IEEE, 1998, 6 pgs.
Wang, X. , et al., “Band alignments in sidewall strained Si/strained SiGe heterostructures”, (May 28, 2002), 1-5.
Wolf, Stanley , et al., Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 1: Process Technology, Lattice Press, Sep. 1986, 3 pgs.
Xiong, Weize , et al., Improvement of FinFET Electrical Characteristics by Hydrogen Annealing, IEEE Electron Device Letters, 25(8), Aug. 2004, 3 pgs.
Xiong, W. , et al., Corner Effect in Multiple-Gate SOI MOSFETs, IEEE, 2003, 3 pgs.
Yang, Fu-Liang , et al., 5nm-Gage Nanowire FinFET, IEEE, 2004, 2 pgs.
Auth, Christopher P., et al., Vertical, Fully-Depleted, Surrounding Gate MOSFETs on sub-0.1 um Thick Silicon Pillars, 54th Annual Device Research Conference Digest, 1996, 2 pgs.
Bandyopadhyay, Krisanu , et al., “Self-Assembled Monolayers of Small Aromatic Disulfide and Diselenide Molecules on Polycrystalline Gold Films:”, Department of Chemistry & Regional Sophisticated Instrumentation Centre, India Institute of Technology, (Apr. 30, 1999).
Burenkov, A. , et al., Corner Effect in Double and Triple Gate FinFETs, European Solid-State Device Research 2003, 33rd Conference on ESSDERC, 4pgs.
Chang, L. , et al., CMOS Circuit Performance Enhancement by Surface Orientation Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 51, No. 10, Oct. 2004, 7 pgs.
Chang, S. T., et al., 3-D Simulation of Strained Si/SiGe Heterojunction FinFets, Semiconductor Device Research Symposium, Dec. 2003, 2 pgs.
Choi, Yang-Kyu , et al., A Spacer Patterning Technology for Nanoscale CMOS, IEEE, (49)3, XP-001102694, Mar. 2002, 6 pgs.
Choi, Yang-Kyu , et al., Sub-20nm CMOS FinFET Technologies, IEEE, IEDM, 2001, 4pgs.
Collaert, N. , et al., A Functional 41-stage ring oscillator using scaled FinFET devices with 25-nm gate lengths and 10-nm fin widths applicable for the 45-nm CMOS node, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 2004, 3 pgs.
Fried, David M., et al., Improved Independent Gate N-Type FinFET Fabrication and Characterization, IEEE 24(9), Sep. 2003, 3 pgs.
Fried, David M., et al., High-Performance P-Type Independent-Gate FinFETs, IEEE 25(4), 2004, 3 pgs.
Guo, Jing , et al., Performance Projections for Ballistic Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors, Applied Physics Letters 80(17), Apr. 29, 2002, 3 pgs.
Hisamoto, Digh , et al., A Fully Depleted Lean-Channel Transistor (Delta)-A Novel Vertical Ultrathin SOI MOSFET, IEEE Electron Device Letters, V. 11 (1), Jan. 1990, 4 pgs.
Hisamoto, Digh , et al., A Folded-Channel MOSFET for Deepsub-tenth Micron Era, 1998 IEEE International Electron Device Meeting Technical Digest, 3 pgs.
Hisamoto, Digh , et al., FinFET-A Self-Aligned Double-Gate MOSFET Scalable to 20 nm, IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 12, Dec. 2000, 6 pgs.
Huang, Xuejue , et al., “Sub 50 nm FinFET: PMOS”, 1999 IEEE International Electron Device Meeting Technical Digest, (1999), pp. 67-70.
Ieong, M. , et al., Three Dimensional CMOS Devices and Integrated Circuits, IEEE CICC San Jose CA Sep. 21-24, 2003, 8 pgs.
Javey, Ali , et al., High-k dielectrics for advanced carbon-nanotube transistors and logic gates, www.nature.com/naturematerials.com, 2002, 6 pgs.
Javey, Ali , et al., Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect transistors, Nature, vol. 424, Aug. 7, 2003, 4 pgs.
Jones, E. C., et al., Doping Challenges in Exploratory Devices for High Performance Logic, 14th Int'l Conference, Piscataway, NJ, Sep. 22-27, 2002, 6 pgs.
Kim, Sung M., et al., A Novel Multi-channel Field Effect Transistor (McFET) on Bulk Si for High Performance Sub-80nm Application, IEEE, 2004, 4 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120142166 A1 Jun 2012 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11498901 Aug 2006 US
Child 13366143 US