The present invention relates generally to semiconductor devices, particularly to strained MOS transistors, and more particularly to strained MOS transistors with a strained layer formed over source/drain and gate regions, where carrier mobility is enhanced in a channel region.
While the scaling down of the device dimensions in a semiconductor integrated circuit continues, maintaining high drive current at scaled voltages and smaller gate dimensions becomes more important. Device drive current is closely related to gate length, gate capacitance, and carrier mobility. Different technology innovations have been made to address this issue. For example, strained silicon technology is demonstrated to boost carrier mobility in a MOS transistor without narrowing channel length. High-K (dielectric constant) gate dielectric is adopted to increase gate capacitance. A metal-gate electrode is used to increase gate capacitance and, therefore, increase the device drive current. A nonplanar device structure such as a FinFET transistor is developed to enable steeper channel-length scaling. Among these efforts, strained silicon technology has been demonstrated to significantly increase carrier mobility without adding much complexity into the existing manufacturing process.
With strained silicon technology, a silicon atom in a MOS transistor is displaced in its lattice. The displacement significantly reconfigures the energy band structure in the silicon to accelerate the flow of electrons and holes, thus increasing device drive current. Strain can be applied to a MOS transistor in different ways. One way to develop strain in a MOS transistor is by selectively forming an epitaxial layer of SiGe (silicon germanium) at the source/drain regions of a conventional MOS transistor. Because the lattice constant of the SiGe is larger than that of Si, the channel region between the two SiGe source/drain is placed under compressive stress. This device configuration enhances hole mobility in the channel region, thus increasing the drive current of a PMOS device. Conversely, a layer of silicon can be formed atop a relaxed SiGe layer. MOS transistors are then formed on the silicon layer. Due to the lattice constant mismatch between Si and SiGe, the Si layer is under constant biaxial, in-plane tensile strain. This device configuration has a benefit of enhancing the electron mobility in an NMOS device.
Strain can also be applied by forming a strained layer on a MOS transistor. The strained layer is also generally referred to as a strain-induced layer, stress layer, contact etching stop (CES) layer, or CES trained layer. In forming a CES layer, a silicon nitride film is deposited over a completed MOS transistor covering the source/drain regions, gate electrode and spacers. Because of the lattice spacing mismatch between the CES layer and underlying layer, an in-plane stress develops to match the spacing. A CES layer thus formed may exhibit different film stress over a broad range, from tensile to compressive, by controlling the N—H, Si—H and Si—N bond ratios in the CES layer and optimizing deposition conditions such as power, temperature and pressure in the processing chamber. It has been revealed that in-plane tensile stress in the channel region enhances electron mobility, thus increasing drive current in an NMOS device, and compressive stress parallel to channel length direction can enhance hole mobility, thus improving PMOS device performance.
In view of these and other problems in the prior CES strain efforts to enhance carrier mobility and improve device performance, there is a need for a method of obtaining an optimized drive current increase with desired uniformity by fine tuning CES layer parameters in advanced MOS transistors.
These and other problems are generally solved or circumvented, and technical advantages are generally achieved, by preferred embodiments of the present invention which provide a CES strained NMOS and PMOS devices having CES layer dimensions in a specific range, which can lead to an optimized drive current increase and improved drive current uniformity in an NMOS and PMOS device, and method of forming.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of the present invention, a semiconductor device formed in a substrate comprises an OD region, a gate region overlying the OD region having an gate electrode on top, a source and drain region formed on the opposite side of the gate region, substantially aligned with an edge of the gate region and the edges of the OD region, a compressive-stress layer having a first and second edge substantially conformally over the gate electrode and the OD region, wherein the space between a gate electrode edge and the first edge is greater than 0.4 um, wherein the space between an OD edge and the second edge is in the range of between about 60 nm to about 400 nm.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a semiconductor device formed in a semiconductor substrate comprises a first PMOS transistor formed in a P-type OD region with a first and second edge, having a first poly gate electrode overlying the P-type OD region, parallel to the first edge, an first NMOS transistor formed in an N-type OD region, having a second poly gate electrode overlying said N-type OD region, a first compressive-stress layer having a first and second edge substantially conformally over the first gate electrode and the P-type OD region, wherein the space between an edge of the first gate electrode and the first edge of the compressive-stress layer is greater than 0.4 um, wherein the space between the second P-type OD edge and the second edge of the compressive-stress layer is in the range of between about 60 nm to about 400 nm.
In accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a PMOS transistor formed in a P-type active region (OD) in a semiconductor substrate comprises a gate region overlying the OD region having a poly gate electrode on the top, a source and drain region formed on the opposite side of the gate region, substantially aligned with an edge of the gate region and the edges of the OD region, a compressive-stress layer substantially conformally over the gate electrode and the OD region having a first and second edge, wherein the space between an edge of the gate electrode and the first edge of the compressive-stress layer is in the range of one to two times either P or G, whichever is larger, where P is the minimum design rule gate poly to P-type OD dimension, and G is the minimum design rule poly-to-poly spacing on an P-type OD region, wherein the space between an P-type OD edge and the second edge of the compressive-stress layer is in the range of between about one-third to about two-thirds of the sum of L and H, where L is the minimum P-type OD to N-well boundary dimension and H is the minimum spacing between an N-type OD and an N-well boundary.
An advantage of the preferred embodiments of the present invention is that it provides an optimized drive current increase in a CES strained PMOS device without adding complex processing steps. CES strained MOS transistors also exhibit improved drive current uniformity.
A further advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is that the added process steps can be readily integrated into a known CMOS process flow. Moreover, the creation of the photo masks defining the tensile and compressive CES layers does not require rework on an existed design database, and no extra design rules are imposed on the design and layout engineers.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The making and using of the presently preferred embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will be described with respect to preferred embodiments in a specific context, namely CES strained NMOS and PMOS devices with an optimized drive current and method of forming. MOS devices thus formed also exhibit an improved uniformity among drive currents. The intermediate stages of manufacturing a preferred embodiment of the present invention are illustrated. The variations of the preferred embodiments are discussed. Throughout the various views and illustrative embodiments, like reference numbers are used to designate like elements.
A gate dielectric 4 is deposited on the surface of the silicon substrate 1. The gate dielectric 4 may preferably be SiO2 formed by any of the known methods, such as thermal oxidation, local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), etc. Silicon nitride can also be used since it is an effective barrier to impurity diffusion. The silicon nitride film is preferably formed by thermal nitridation of silicon. It can also be prepared by plasma anodic nitridation using nitrogen-hydrogen. The silicon nitride film may also be formed by thermal nitridation of SiO2. The gate dielectric may also be oxy-nitride, oxygen-containing dielectric, nitrogen-containing dielectric, high-k materials or any combinations thereof.
A gate electrode 6 is formed on gate dielectric 4. The gate electrode 6 is preferably polysilicon (referred to hereafter as “poly”), although it may be formed of metal, or a compound structure comprising a metal, semiconductor, metal oxide and/or silicide. The preferred method of formation is CVD. Other embodiments may use amorphous silicon, elemental metals that are conductive, alloys of elemental metals that are conductive, silicides or nitrides of elemental metals that are conductive, or any combination thereof. Typically, the gate electrode 6 and gate dielectric 4 are deposited as layers and then patterned to form a gate. A pair of spacers 8 is formed along the sidewalls of the gate dielectric 4 and gate electrode 6. As known in the art, spacers 8 are preferably formed by blanket depositing a dielectric layer over an entire region, then, anisotropically etching to remove the dielectric layer from horizontal surfaces, thus leaving spacers 8.
In the preferred embodiment, the source/drain regions 12 are formed by implanting P-type impurities, such as boron, into the N-well 2. The spacers 8 are used as a mask so that edges of the source/drain regions 12 are substantially aligned with the spacers 8. Gate electrode 6 is preferably also implanted to reduce sheet resistance. In other embodiments, the source/drain regions 12 are formed by recessing the source/drain regions 12 followed by epitaxially growing silicon, SiGe, or SiC in the recesses with a desired dopant. This structure provides a compressive stress to the channel of the PMOS device and enhances hole mobility. In yet other embodiments, source/drain regions 12 are formed by expitaxially growing silicon, SiGe, or SiC with desired dopant on the top surface of the silicon substrate 1. Preferably, a SiO2 film is formed in regions where no source and drain is to be formed. The subsequently deposited epitaxial film on the SiO2 film can be removed. In the source/drain regions (i.e., where substrate surface is exposed), epitaxial film is grown.
To reduce the resistance of the gate electrode 6 and source/drain regions 12, an optionally silicide layer (not shown) may be formed on the top of gate electrode 6 and source/drain regions 12 by a silicide process. The silicide is preferably NiSi2, CoSi2, TiSi2, or the like. To form a silicide layer, a thin layer of metal such as cobalt, nickel, titanium, or the like, is sputtered over the device. The device is then annealed to form a silicide between the deposited metal and the underlying exposed silicon regions. Un-reacted metal is removed by an etch process.
Next, as shown in
In
Strain can also be adjusted by the type and concentration of impurities in the underlying material, which includes forming an epitaxial layer (not shown) in the source/drain regions 12. In one preferred embodiment, an epitaxial layer of silicon germanium is formed in the silicon source/drain regions 12, which typically increases the material's lattice constant (because germanium has a larger lattice constant). This structure provides a compressive stress to the channel of the PMOS device and enhances hole mobility. In another embodiment, a silicon carbon epitaxial layer is formed in the silicon source/drain regions of an NMOS transistor, which typically decreases the material's lattice constant (because carbon has a smaller lattice constant). This structure provides a tensile stress to the channel of the NMOS device and enhances electron mobility.
In a preferred embodiment, a CES layer 14 comprises a dielectric material. In alternative embodiments, a CES layer 14 comprises semiconductors, metals, and combinations thereof. The CES layer 14 may also be in the form of a single layer or composite layers. An advantageous feature of such material, as explained herein, is that these materials have an inherent stress when deposited, which induces a strain in the underlying material. In preferred embodiments, the CES layer 14 has a thickness from about 5 nm to about 500 nm.
In preferred embodiments, the values of an optimized range of ENx and ENy corresponding to a technology generation are obtained through a wafer acceptance test (WAT) on a plurality of CES strained core transistors, such as that shown in
In obtaining the optimized range of ENx and ENy of a certain technology generation, a plurality of CES strained PMOS core transistors are formed on a silicon wafer scribe line. These transistors have a minimum channel length allowable by the specific technology generation (sometimes referred to as transistors with “on-rule” channel length) and channel width of various values. In one embodiment, a plurality of CES strained PMOS core transistors are provided, having a channel length of 65 nm and channel width (W) of 1 μm, 0.6 μm, and 0.14 μm. These transistors also have a fixed ENy of about 70 nm and ENx of various dimensions. Drive current (Idsat) is measured on each transistor, aiming to obtain an ENx corresponding to a maximum Idsat improvement.
A similar test is carried out to obtain the optimized range of ENy. In one embodiment, PMOS transistors used for obtaining the optimized range of ENy have a fixed ENx of about 0.5 μm and ENy of various dimensions.
Similar wafer acceptance test (WAT) has been conducted on CES strained NMOS core transistors. A CES layer is formed over a plurality of NMOS transistors of various configurations to create in-plane tensile strain in the channel region. Although a similar trend is observed where ENx and ENy within a range as described above can lead to improved drive current enhancement and improved drive current uniformity, the effect is less significant than that of a CES strained PMOS device.
According to STEP 11 in
At a STEP 12 in
Further, as described in STEP 13 of
In STEP 14 of
After the formation of the patterned compressive CES layer 14 on PMOS devices and patterned tensile CES layer 16 on NMOS devices, a blanket deposition of SiO2 through CVD is conducted to form a first inter-layer dielectric layer (ILD), although other known materials and methods of forming an ILD layer are not excluded. A planarization process, such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process may then be applied to create a flat substrate surface, as shown in
It can be recognized that, after the current processing step, the CES layers formed on substrate 2 surface may have the following lateral configuration. Between MOS transistors of same conductivity type, the adjacent CES layers may be in a tensile-ILD-tensile or compressive-ILD-compressive configuration. Between MOS transistors of opposite conductivity type, the adjacent CES layers have a tensile-ILD-compressive configuration.
In other embodiments, after the formation of the patterned compressive CES layer 14 on PMOS devices and patterned tensile CES layer 16 on NMOS devices, a tensile film 14′ or a compressive film 16′ may be formed filling the lateral space between adjacent CES layers on substrate 2 surface in order to balance the stresses in the CES layers 14 and 16, thus reaching a desired drive current balance between adjacent NMOS and PMOS devices.
In an additional embodiment, a plurality of PMOS and a plurality of NMOS transistors are formed on a semiconductor substrate through the processes described above. Each of the PMOS and NMOS transistors is covered by a compressive CES layer and a tensile CES layer, respectively, with desired ENx and ENy. In the current embodiment, the CES layer configurations between adjacent MOS devices may include tensile-compressive-tensile, compressive-tensile-compressive, tensile-tensile-tensile, compressive-compressive-compressive, tensile-compressive-compressive, and compressive-tensile-tensile. Various CES layer configurations between adjacent MOS devices are shown in
In a further embodiment, a PILD photo mask is first developed by a logical operation process described above to pattern compressive CES layer 14 for optimized PMOS performance. The NILD photo mask is then developed as the reverse of the PILD mask, thus eliminating the cost of creating a dedicated NILP mask. After the processing steps shown in
In an even further embodiment, a single photo mask PILD is developed by a logical operation process to pattern compressive CES layer 14 for optimized PMOS performance. The same mask layer is applied a second time on negative photoresist to pattern tensile CES layer 16. An NILD photo mask is not necessary, thus further reducing the cost of mask development.
As can be recognized by those skilled in the art, the preferred embodiments improve device performance without adding complex processing steps. Moreover, the added process steps can be readily integrated into a known CMOS process flow. Furthermore, the creation of NILD and PILD photo masks does not require additional works or changes on an existed design database. Optimized ENx and ENy corresponding to a certain technology node apply to all design projects developed using the same technology. No extra design rules are imposed on design and layout engineers.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. As an additional example shown in
Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/880,563, filed on Jan. 16, 2007, entitled “Dual Contact Etching Stop Layer Scheme for Advanced Device Control,” which application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4069094 | Shaw et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4314269 | Fujiki | Feb 1982 | A |
4497683 | Celler et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4631803 | Hunter et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4892614 | Chapman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4946799 | Blake et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4952993 | Okumura | Aug 1990 | A |
5130773 | Tsukada | Jul 1992 | A |
5155571 | Wang et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5273915 | Hwang et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5338960 | Beasom | Aug 1994 | A |
5378919 | Ochiai | Jan 1995 | A |
5447884 | Fahey et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5461250 | Burghartz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5479033 | Baca et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5525828 | Bassous et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534713 | Ismail et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5596529 | Noda et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5629544 | Voldman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5656524 | Eklund et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5708288 | Quigley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714777 | Ismail et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5763315 | Benedict et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783850 | Liau et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5789807 | Correale, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811857 | Assaderaghi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5936276 | Maurelli et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955766 | Ibi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965917 | Maszara et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972722 | Visokay et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6008095 | Gardner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015993 | Voldman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027988 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046487 | Benedict et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059895 | Chu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6096591 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100153 | Nowak et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100204 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103599 | Henley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107125 | Jaso et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111267 | Fischer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6190996 | Mouli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222234 | Imai | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232163 | Voldman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256239 | Akita et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258664 | Reinberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281059 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6291321 | Fitzgerald | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294834 | Yeh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303479 | Snyder | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339232 | Takagi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358791 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387739 | Smith, III | May 2002 | B1 |
6396137 | Klughart | May 2002 | B1 |
6396506 | Hoshino et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6407406 | Tezuka | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413802 | Hu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6414355 | An et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420218 | Yu | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420264 | Talwar et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429061 | Rim | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433382 | Orlowski et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448114 | An et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448613 | Yu | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475838 | Bryant et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6475869 | Yu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489215 | Mouli et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6489664 | Re et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6489684 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495900 | Mouli et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498359 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6518610 | Yang et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521952 | Ker et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524905 | Yamamichi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525403 | Inaba et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6541343 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555839 | Fitzgerald | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558998 | Belleville et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573172 | En et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6576526 | Kai et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586311 | Wu | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600170 | Xiang | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6617643 | Goodwin-Johansson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621131 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633070 | Miura et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6646322 | Fitzgerald | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653700 | Chau et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657259 | Fried et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6657276 | Karlsson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674100 | Kubo et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686247 | Bohr | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690082 | Lakshmikumar | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6720619 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724019 | Oda et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734527 | Xiang | May 2004 | B1 |
6737710 | Cheng et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740535 | Singh et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6759717 | Sagarwala et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762448 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6784101 | Yu et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6794764 | Kamal et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797556 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798021 | Ipposhi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803641 | Papa Rao et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812103 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815288 | Kim | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821840 | Wieczorek et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830962 | Guarini et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6861318 | Murthy et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867101 | Yu | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867433 | Yeo et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872610 | Mansoori et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6882025 | Yeo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885084 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891192 | Chen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900502 | Ge et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6924181 | Huang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936506 | Buller et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936881 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939814 | Chan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6940705 | Yeo et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6969618 | Mouli | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6982433 | Hoffman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998311 | Forbes et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7029994 | Ge et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7052964 | Yeo et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071052 | Yeo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081395 | Chi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7101742 | Ko et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112495 | Ko et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7164163 | Chen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7193269 | Toda et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7220630 | Cheng et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7268024 | Yeo et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7303955 | Kim | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7354843 | Yeo et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7442967 | Ko et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7528028 | Liang et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
20010028089 | Adan | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020008289 | Murota et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031890 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045318 | Chen et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020074598 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020076899 | Skotnicki et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020125471 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140031 | Rim | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153549 | Laibowitz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163036 | Miura et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190284 | Murthy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001219 | Chau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030091 | Bulsara et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030080361 | Murthy et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080386 | Ker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080388 | Disney et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098479 | Murthy et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030136985 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030162348 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181005 | Hachimine et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183880 | Goto et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227013 | Currie et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016972 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018668 | Maszara | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040026765 | Currie et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029323 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040063300 | Chi | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070035 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087098 | Ng et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104405 | Huang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040108598 | Cabral, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040129982 | Oda et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140506 | Singh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040173815 | Yeo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179391 | Bhattacharyya | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217448 | Kumagai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040262683 | Bohr et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266116 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012087 | Sheu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029601 | Chen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035369 | Lin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035410 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082522 | Huang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093078 | Chan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136584 | Boyanov et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050186722 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050224986 | Tseng et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050224988 | Tuominen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236694 | Wu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266632 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050269650 | Pidin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001073 | Chen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060121727 | Metz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070040225 | Yang | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070267680 | Uchino et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080296695 | Yang | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090230439 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100078725 | Hou et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 683 522 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 828 296 | Mar 1998 | EP |
WO-03017336 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“1-D and 2-D Geometry Effects in Uniaxially-Strained Dual Etch Stop Layer Stressor Integrations” by Grudowski et al. 2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 01-4244-0005-8/06/$20.00 (c) 2006 IEEE. |
“Future Gate Stack,” SEMATECH Inc., 2001 Annual Report, 2 pages. |
Bednar, T. R., et al., “Issues and Strategies for the Physical Design of System-on-a-Chip ASICs,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 46, No. 6, Nov. 2002, pp. 661-674. |
Bianchi, R. A., et al., “Accurate Modeling of Trench Isolation Induced Mechanical Stress Effects on MOSFET Electrical Performance,” IEDM, 2002, pp. 117-120. |
Blaauw, D., et al., “Gate Oxide and Subthreshold Leakage Characterization, Analysis and Optimization,” date unknown, 2 pages. |
Cavassilas, N., et al., “Capacitance-Voltage Characteristics of Metal-Oxide-Strained Semiconductor Si/SiGe Heterostructures,” Nanotech 2002, vol. 1, pp. 600-603. |
Celik, M., et al., “A 45 nm Gate Length High Performance SOI Transistor for 100nm CMOS Technology Applications,” 2002 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, pp. 166-167. |
Chang, L., et al., “Direct-Tunneling Gate Leakage Current in Double-Gate and Ultrathin Body MOSFETs,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 12, Dec. 2002, pp. 2288-2295. |
Chang, L., et al., “Reduction of Direct-Tunneling Gate Leakage Current in Double-Gate and Ultra-Thin Body MOSFETs,” IEEE, 2001, 4 pages. |
Chau, R., et al., “A 50nm Depleted-Substrate CMOS Transistor (DST),” IEDM, 2001, pp. 621-624. |
Chen, W., et al., “Suppression of the SOI Floating-Body Effects by Linked-Body Device Structure,” 1996 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, pp. 92-93. |
Fung, S. K. H. et al., “Gate Length Scaling Accelerated to 30nm Regime Using Ultra-Thin Film PD-SOI Technology,” IEDM, 2001, pp. 629-632. |
Gámiz, F., et al., “Electron Transport in Strained Si Inversion Layers Grown on SiGe-on-Insulator Substrates,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, No. 1, Jul. 1, 2002, pp. 288-295. |
Gámiz, F. et al., “Strained-Si/SiGe-on-Insulator Inversion Layers: The Role of Strained-Si Layer Thickness on Electron Mobility,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 22, Jun. 3, 2002, pp. 4160-4162. |
Ge, C.-H., et al., “Process-Strained Si (PSS) CMOS Technology Featuring 3D Strain Engineering,” IEDM, 2003, pp. 73-76. |
Geppert, L., “The Amazing Vanishing Transistor Act,” IEEE Spectrum, Oct. 2002, pp. 28-33. |
Ghani, T., et al., “A 90nm High Volume Manufacturing Logic Technology Featuring Novel 45nm Gate Length Strained Silicon CMOS Transistors,” IEDM, 2003, pp. 978-980. |
Huang, X., et al., “Sub-50 nm P-Channel FinFET,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, No. 5, May 2001, pp. 880-886. |
Ismail, K., et al., “Electron Transport Properties of Si/SiGe Heterostructures: Measurements and Device Implications,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 63, No. 5, Aug. 2, 1993, pp. 660-662. |
Ito, S., et al., “Mechanical Stress Effect of Etch-Stop Nitride and Its Impact on Deep Submicron Transistor Design,” IEDM, 2000, pp. 247-250. |
Jurczak, M., et al., “Silicon-on-Nothing (SON)—an Innovative Process for Advanced CMOS,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 11, Nov. 2000, pp. 2179-2187. |
Jurczak, M., et al., “SON (Silicon on Nothing)—A New Device Architecture for the ULSI Era,” 1999 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, pp. 29-30. |
Kanda, Y., “A Graphical Representation of the Piezoresistance Coefficients in Silicon,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-29, No. 1, Jan. 1982, pp. 64-70. |
Leitz, C. W., et al., “Channel Engineering of SiGe-Based Heterostructures for High Mobility MOSFETs,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 686, 2002, pp. 113-118. |
Leitz, C. W. et al., “Hole Mobility Enhancements in Strained Si/Si1-yGey P-Type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors Grown on Relaxed Si1-xGex (x<y) Virtual Substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 25, Dec. 17, 2001, pp. 4246-4248. |
Liu, K. C., et al., “A Novel Sidewall Strained-Si Channel nMOSFET,” IEDM, 1999, pp. 63-66. |
Maiti, C. K., et al., “Film Growth and Material Parameters,” Application of Silicon-Germanium Heterostructure, Ch. 2, Institute of Physics Publishing, pp. 32-42. |
Matthews, J. W., “Defects Associated with the Accommodation of Misfit between Crystals,” The Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, vol. 12, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1975, pp. 126-133. |
Matthews, J. W., et al., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers—I. Misfit Dislocations,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 27, 1974, pp. 118-125. |
Matthews, J. W., et al., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers—II. Dislocation Pile-Ups, Threading Dislocations, Slip Lines and Cracks,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 29, 1975, pp. 273-280. |
Matthews, J. W., et al., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers—III. Preparation of Almost Perfect Multilayers,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 32, 1976, pp. 265-273. |
Mizuno, T., et al., “Novel SOI p-Channel MOSFETs with Higher Strain in Si Channel Using Double SiGe Heterostructures,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 7-14. |
Nayak, D. K., et al., “Enhancement-Mode Quantum-Well GexSi1-x PMOS,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 12, No. 4, Apr. 1991, pp. 154-156. |
Ootsuka, F., et al., “A Highly Dense, High-Performance 130nm Node CMOS Technology for Large Scale System-on-a-Chip Applications,” IEDM, 2000, pp. 575-578. |
Ota, K., et al., “Novel Locally Strained Channel Technique for High Performance 55nm CMOS,” IEDM, 2002, pp. 27-30. |
Rim, K., et al., “Fabrication and Analysis of Deep Submicron Strained-Si N-MOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 7, Jul. 2000, pp. 1406-1415. |
Rim, K., “Strained Si Surface Channel MOSFETs for High-Performance CMOS Technology,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, 2001, pp. 116-117. |
Schüppen, A., et al., “Mesa and Planar SiGe-HBTs on MBE-Wafers,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 6, 1995, pp. 298-305. |
Scott, G., et al., “NMOS Drive Current Reduction Caused by Transistor Layout and Trench Isolation Induced Stress,” IEDM, 1999, pp. 827-830. |
Shahidi, G. G., “SOI Technology for the GHz Era,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 46, No. 2/3, Mar./May 2002, pp. 121-131. |
Shimizu, A., et al., “Local Mechanical-Stress Control (LMC): A New Technique for CMOS-Performance Enhancement,” IEDM, 2001, pp. 433-436. |
Tezuka, T., et al., “High-Performance Strained Si-on-Insulator MOSFETs by Novel Fabrication Processes Utilizing Ge-Condensation Technique,” 2002 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, pp. 96-97. |
Thompson, S., et al., “A 90 nm Logic Technology Featuring 50nm Strained Silicon Channel Transistors, 7 Layers of Cu Interconnects, Low k ILD, and 1 um2 SRAM Cell,” IEDM, 2002, pp. 61-64. |
Tiwari, S. et al., “Hole Mobility Improvement in Silicon-on-Insulator and Bulk Silicon Transistors Using Local Strain,” IEDM, 1997, pp. 939-941. |
Wang, L. K., et al., “On-Chip Decoupling Capacitor Design to Reduce Switching-Noise-Induced Instability in CMOS/SOI VLSI,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 1995, pp. 100-101. |
Welser, J. et al., “NMOS and PMOS Transistors Fabricated in Strained Silicon/Relaxed Silicon-Germanium Structures,” IEDM, 1992, pp. 1000-1002. |
Wong, H.-S. P., “Beyond the Conventional Transistor,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 46, No. 2/3, Mar./May 2002, pp. 133-167. |
Yang, F.-L., et al., “25 nm CMOS Omega FETs,” IEDM, 2002, pp. 255-258. |
Yang, F.-L., et al., “35nm CMOS FinFETs,” 2002 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, pp. 104-105. |
Yeo, Y.-C., et al., “Enhanced Performance in Sub-100 nm CMOSFETs Using Strained Epitaxial Silicon-Germanium,” IEDM, 2000, pp. 753-756. |
Yeoh, J. C., et al., “MOS Gated Si:SiGe Quantum Wells Formed by Anodic Oxidation,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 13, 1998, pp. 1442-1445. |
Grudowski, P., et al., “1-D and 2-D Geometry Effects in Uniaxially-Strained Dual Etch Stop Layer Stressor Integrations,” 2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, 2006, 2 pages. |
Uejima, K., et al., “Highly Efficient Stress Transfer Techniques in Dual Stress Liner CMOS Integration,” 2007 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, Paper 12A-4, IEEE, 2007, pp. 220-221. |
Wolf, S., et al., “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era,”, vol. 1: Process Technology, Second Edition, Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA, 2000, pp. 834-835. |
Wolf, S., et al, “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era,”, vol. 2: Process Integration, Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA, 2000, pp. 144-145. |
Wolf, S., et al., “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era,”, vol. 1: Process Technology, Second Edition, Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA, 2000, pp. 374-385. |
Wolf, S., et al., “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era,”, vol. 2: Process Integration, Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA, 2000, pp. 658-663. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080169484 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60880563 | Jan 2007 | US |