As technology advances, devices continue to shrink in size and it becomes increasingly difficult to test or verify the operation of the devices. One example of this is found in storage systems based on magnetic recording technology, which is commonly used in devices such as computers and digital electrical household appliances, including digital video recorders (DVRs) or personal video recorders (PVRs). In operation, a magnetic write head is used to magnetize bits of data on a recording medium, commonly referred to as a hard disk, while a read sensor is used to read the bits of data from the hard disk.
It is desirable to test devices, such as write heads, early in the manufacturing process to increase yield and reduce costs. However, as devices, such as write heads, continue to shrink in size it is increasingly difficult to perform accurate measurements early in the manufacturing process. For example, a write head includes several small elements, such as a write pole, return pole/shield, etc. The write pole in particular has a size that is below the resolution of conventional optical imaging techniques. Accordingly, to image the write pole, typically a scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used. However, SEM is an expensive, time consuming test that is potentially destructive. Another method of testing a writer is with Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM), where an MFM probe scans across the surface of the write pole while the writer is excited with a current. Alternatively, a spin-stand is sometimes used to test the write head. However, a spin-stand test is also an expensive and time-consuming test.
A quality parameter of a write pole in a write head is determined using an optical metrology device, where the write pole is smaller than the optical resolution limit of the metrology device. The metrology device produces polarized light that is reflected off the write pole while the write pole is magnetized and the intensity of the light registered by the optical metrology device is determined by its point spread function. The magnetization alters the polarization state of the light, which can be analyzed to convert the altered polarization state into intensity after the analyzer and the intensity value is measured. The intensity value is measured after the analyzer and is used to determine the quality parameter of the write pole, e.g., by comparison to a threshold or reference intensity value, which may be generated empirically or theoretically.
The device 100 includes a light source 102, which may be a laser, light emitting diode (LED), or laser diode and may have a wavelength of, e.g., 445 nm. If desired, other wavelengths may be used including wavelengths in the non-visible region of the spectrum, e.g., UV or DUV. Moreover, if desired, multiple wavelengths maybe used from multiple light sources or from a broadband light source. When a laser is used as the light source 102, the coherence of the laser light has to be reduced or eliminated to avoid speckles and diffraction artifacts in the image. The coherence of the laser light can be reduced by one or more of the following; vibrating an optical fiber through which the light is transmitted, modulating the laser at a frequency of e.g. 250 MHz, using a dynamic mirror with an oscillating membrane, or by inserting an optical diffuser in the illuminating light path. In a different approach, a multimode laser diode can be used to reduce light coherence with or without the previous measures implemented.
The light from the light source 102 is provided to a collimator 104 either directly or by way of an intervening optical element, e.g., fiber optics or a light pipe. The collimator 104 expands and collimates the light, which is polarized by polarizer 106. In an embodiment in which the device is a confocal polarization microscope, the one or more movable lenses may be included along with one or more apertures. A beam splitter 108 reflects a portion of the light and the light is focused by an objective lens 110, e.g., at a normal angle of incidence on the write head 112. It should be understood, however, that an oblique angle of incidence may be used with an appropriate adjustment of the optics in device 100. The objective lens 110 focuses the light onto the write pole 114 of the write head 112. The write head 112 may be held on a stage 164 that adjusts the position (x, y) of the write head 112 to align the write pole 114 with the optical axis (OA). The stage 164 may further adjust the vertical (z) height of the write head 112 for focusing if desired.
The light reflected from the write pole 114 passes back through the objective lens 110 and is transmitted through the beam splitter 108. The light passes through an optional quarter wave plate 116 and another polarizer, referred to as analyzer 118, analyzes the polarization state of the returned light, which is then focused by lens 120 onto an optical detector 122. By way of example, the polarizer 106 and the analyzer 118 may be set to have an angle difference of ±90°. In one implementation, the orientation of the polarizer 106 and analyzer 118 is automatically adjusted by a motorized, computer controlled stage to adjust for a variability in the optical properties of the write head ABS in order to maximize the magneto-optic contrast. In one embodiment, a polarizing beam splitter 108 may be used in place of the polarizer 106 and analyzer 118. With the use of the quarter wave plate 116, the phase shift between the p- and s-wave is translated into intensity, which measures the polarization phase. Without the quarter wave plate 116, the polarization angle is converted into intensity. The optical detector 122 may be, e.g., a CCD or a CMOS based camera, or other appropriate two-dimensional detector array. For example, a high resolution CCD camera with 1334×1024 pixels and 12 bit, such as that produced by Hamamatsu Co may be used as the optical detector 122.
The optical detector 122, thus, produces optically detected data in response to the magnetization of the write pole and provides the optically detected data to a computer 130 via an optional frame grabber. The computer 130 receives, stores, and analyzes the optically detected data provided by the optical detector 122. The computer 130 includes a processor 132 with memory 134, as well as a user interface including e.g., a display 138 and input devices 140. A non-transitory computer-usable storage medium 142 having computer-readable program code embodied may be used by the computer 130 for causing the processor to control the device and to perform a desired analysis, as described herein. The data structures and software code for automatically implementing one or more acts described in this detailed description can be implemented by one of ordinary skill in the art in light of the present disclosure and stored, e.g., on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium 142, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system such as processor 132. The computer-usable storage medium 142 may be, but is not limited to, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, compact discs, and DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs). A communication port 144 may also be used to receive instructions that are used to program the computer 130 to perform any one or more of the functions described herein and may represent any type of communication connection, such as to the internet or any other computer network. Additionally, the functions described herein may be embodied in whole or in part within the circuitry of an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or a programmable logic device (PLD), and the functions may be embodied in a computer understandable descriptor language which may be used to create an ASIC or PLD that operates as herein described.
As illustrated in
The device 100 may also include an auto focusing system 150 that includes a separate light source 152, which may be, e.g., a laser that produces light with a different wavelength than the light produced by light source 102. For example, focus light source 152 may produce light at 635 nm. The light from the focus light source 152 is provided to a collimator 154 and is transmitted by beam splitter 156. A dichroic beam splitter 158 is positioned to reflect light from the focus light source 152 to the write head 112. The dichroic beam splitter 158 transmits light from the light source 102. The return light is reflected by the dichroic beam splitter 158 and beam splitter 156 to a focus detector 160. The focus detector 160 maybe, e.g., a camera or a photo detector or a photo detector array combined with appropriate optics to generate an out-off-focus signal, e.g. a knife edge detector or a phase detector, that is coupled to the computer 130. The computer 130 may be coupled to a focus stage 162, which may be coupled to the objective lens 110 to alter the vertical (z) position of the objective lens 110. Alternatively, the computer 130 may control the vertical (z) position of the stage 164 that holds the write head 112. Additionally, a filter 166 is positioned between the lens 120 and the detector 122 to prevent the light from the focus light source 152 from entering the detector 122.
The focus of the device 100 may be achieved by focusing on a structure in the write head 112 that is larger than the resolution limit of the device and that has a known offset distance with respect to the write pole 114. For example, the focusing system 150 may focus on a shield or other large structure near the write pole 114 that is on the write head 112 or the slider. Because the structure is larger than the resolution limit of the optics in the device 100, by maximizing the differential edge contracts of the structure, the structure can be imaged (without use of a magnet-optic contrast) and the focus can be adjusted to place the structure at the vertical position that provides the sharpest image. The vertical position of the objective lens 110 (or write head 112) may then be adjusted by a vertical offset distance to place the write pole 114 at the best focal position, which may be performed automatically by programming the close loop focusing system with a previously established offset value. In some implementations, the vertical offset distance may be negligible and an offset distance of 0 nm may be used. Additionally, the horizontal position along the x-axis and y-axis of the stage 164 may be adjusted to align the write pole 114 along the optical axis of the device 100. Alternatively, if the write pole 114 is already in the field of view, no physical adjustment of the horizontal position may be necessary.
The vertical offset distance between the structure that is used for focusing and the write pole 114, however, is generally an approximation. Therefore, the focal position may be refined by measuring the write pole 114 using the device 100 at multiple vertical positions until a maximum intensity value of the magneto-optic contrast is generated and using the corresponding vertical position as the best focal position.
In operation, optical metrology device 100 measures a quality parameter of the write pole 114 or the entire write head even though the largest dimension of the write pole 114 that is perpendicular to the optical axis of the device 100 is smaller than the resolution limit of the device 100 and therefore the optics of the device 100 cannot produce an image of the write pole 114.
where λ is the wavelength of the incident light and NA is the numerical aperture of the objective lens. By way of example, at normal incidence with a wavelength of 442 nm and an objective numerical aperture of 0.9, the resolution limit 100Res is 300 nm, i.e., 3 times greater than the greatest dimension of the write pole 114. In practice, however, the actual optical resolution limit is even worse than that suggested by the theoretical limit, e.g., by 20% or more, due to factors such as spherical aberration of the objective lens and the illumination aperture.
Because the write pole 114 is much smaller than the resolution limit of the device, an attempt to image the write pole 114 results in an approximate image of the point spread function (PSF) of the optics of the metrology device 100. The PSF is the response of the optical system to a point light source, where the central peak of the PSF is sometimes referred to as the Airy Disk. The light intensity, as detected by the optical system of the optical metrology device 100, is determined by the convolution of the PSF and the geometry of the object, i.e., the write pole 114. To illustrate this point, reference is made to
where σ is the half-width. The simplified 2-D object Gaussian curve G(x,y) approximates the geometry of the write pole 114. The convolution C(x,y) of
Due to the convolution of the PSF and the geometry of the sub-resolution write pole 114, imaging of the write pole itself is not possible. The intensity measured over the area of the Airy disk or the peak intensity is proportional to the area of the object as illustrated in
The reflected light is analyzed using the analyzer 118 to transform the altered polarization state of the reflected light into intensity distributed over the point spread function of the optical metrology device (206). The intensity of the light after the analyzer is then detected (208), e.g., using detector 122 in
Using the detected intensity distributed over the point spread function, an intensity value is generated (210). A useful intensity value may be generated by, e.g., measuring a peak value of the intensity or averaging the intensity over a region that includes the peak value, the region may be limited to intensities that are greater than a threshold. Alternatively, an intensity value may be produced by combining a plurality of intensity values over the point spread function, e.g., by summing the peak value, along with a number of intensity values along the curve. Other methods of generating an intensity value may be used as well.
The generated intensity value is used to determine a quality parameter of the write pole (212), such as write-field strength, write-field saturation, head efficiency as determined by the field-strength to current dependence, etc. If desired, the intensity value may be related to magnetized areas of the write head other than the write pole, i.e., intensities at various positions around the write pole may be also or alternatively measured. To determine the quality parameter, the intensity value may be compared to a threshold, a reference value, or a library of information, which may be produced empirically or theoretically by modeling. For example, the generated intensity value for a write head under test may be compared to a similarly generated intensity value for a known good write head, where the determined quality parameter can then be stored in memory (214), e.g., memory 134 in processor 130 or otherwise reported, e.g., displayed by display 138. It should be understood that storing the determined quality parameter in memory may be long term storage of data or it may be temporarily stored, for example, in order to display the result on a monitor or print the result. The quality parameter can be used to, e.g., accept or reject samples with unsatisfactory characteristics or to separate, e.g., bin, samples based on performance. Further, the determined quality parameter may be used in process feedback control in the production of samples. Additionally, the determined quality parameter may be used in the evaluation and/or comparison of sample designs.
If desired, the magnetization of the write pole 114 may be optically detected when different write currents are applied to the write head 112.
Alternatively a lock-in amplifier 180, shown in
Additionally, to increase the magneto-optic contrast, the magnetization of the write pole 114 may be optically detected for negative and positive write currents and the two optically detected magnetizations are subtracted to eliminate light that has no magnetic information, which can also be done for different absolute magnitude write currents. Further, if desired, the magnetization of the write pole 114 may be optically detected for zero write current, which may then be subtracted from subsequent optical detections of magnetizations to eliminate light that has no magnetic information, which can also be done for different absolute magnitude write currents. Further, the intensity value may be detected for different write current values. Additionally, if desired, the magnetization of the write pole 114 may be optically detected while exercising a Dynamic Fly Height device or a microactuator device that may be present on a write head.
In addition, it may be desirable to measure the effect of AC current and particularly overshoot in the write current waveform on the magnetization response and the remanent magnetization of the write head. One method of measuring the effects on the magnetization response of the write head includes producing magnetization of the write pole 114 (step 205 in
If desired, a bias current may be applied to the write head, e.g., using a bias-T circuit 129 in the current source 128. With a 30 mA write current, by applying, e.g., a +30 mA, bias current offset, the positive write current amplitude is increased to 60 mA, while the negative write current will be 0 mA, excluding effects of the overshoot.
If the current source 128 has very high frequency overshoot characteristics, such as 100 ps timing as may be possible with a typical write driver pre-amp chip, it may be desirable to use a probe card 124 and a bias-T circuit 129 (
Additionally, remanence in the write head may be measured. For example, as illustrated in
The effect of overshoot on remanence may also be measured. For example, as discussed above, the applied positive current (502) may be an AC write current with the last pulse of write current that is applied being positive, followed by optically detecting the magnetization when no write current is applied to a write head to get Positive Remanence. Similarly, the applied negative current (506) may be an AC write current with the last pulse of write current that is applied being negative, followed by optically detecting the magnetization when no write current is applied to a write head to get Negative Remanence. Alternatively, the write current waveforms could be a single positive or negative pulse with or without overshoot. The difference between the two measurements can then provide a measure of remanence. With the use of the AC write current, the effect of overshoot on remanence may be detected. If desired, a 50% duty cycle may be used, but other duty cycles may be used as well and the frequency of this AC write waveform may be varied. Further, the magnitude and/or duration of the overshoot may be altered.
If desired, optical detection of the magnetization may be performed during the application of the AC write current to produce a reference for the remanence.
Although the present invention is illustrated in connection with specific embodiments for instructional purposes, the present invention is not limited thereto. Various adaptations and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the foregoing description.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/381,024, filed Sep. 8, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/503,585, filed Jun. 30, 2011, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4896103 | Shimanuki et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5212446 | Itoh et al. | May 1993 | A |
5631559 | Oliver et al. | May 1997 | A |
5663652 | Freeman | Sep 1997 | A |
5835257 | Itoh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5969517 | Rao | Oct 1999 | A |
6084396 | Rao | Jul 2000 | A |
6141093 | Argyle et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6934068 | Kochergin | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7271900 | Decitre et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20100170017 | Heidmann | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120057446 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61381024 | Sep 2010 | US | |
61503585 | Jun 2011 | US |