Surgical robotic systems are currently being used in minimally invasive medical procedures. Some surgical robotic systems may include a console supporting a surgical robotic arm and a surgical instrument having an end effector (e.g., forceps or grasping tool) coupled to the robotic arm, which is actuated by the robotic arm. The robotic arm may include a plurality of links, whose movement and pivoting may pose a shearing and crushing danger to the user's fingers and hands. The presence of a sterile drape between the robotic arm and the user prevents the practical application of many conventional sensors. The present disclosure provides for a sensor system capable of recognizing when obstructions (e.g., hands, fingers, objects, etc.) contact high-risk areas of the robotic arm and reacts preemptively to avoid any injury by posting a warning to the user and immediately stopping motion of the robot, by providing audible and/or tactile feedback, or some other desired reaction.
The present disclosure provides one or more sensor assemblies disposed on one or more links of a robotic arm to prevent injury to users when coming in contact with moving links of the robotic arm. The sensor assemblies include an elastomeric interface member having a curved or raised rib and a force sensing resistor (“FSR”) disposed underneath the interface member. The FSR is configured to detect force. The FSR is coupled to a control device, which is configured to interpret a given level of resistance as force, and correlate the measured force to physical contact of the robotic arm with an obstruction.
According to one embodiment, a surgical robotic arm is disclosed. The surgical robotic arm includes a first link and a second link, wherein at least one of the first link or second link is movable relative to each other. The surgical robotic arm also includes a sensor assembly coupled to at least one of the first link or the second link. The sensor assembly includes: a force sensing resistor assembly configured to measure force and an interface member disposed over the force sensing resistor assembly, the interface member configured to engage the at least one force sensing resistor assembly due to the interface member contacting an obstruction.
According to one aspect of the above embodiment, the interface member includes an outer protrusion and an inner protrusion. The outer protrusion may be offset from a center of the at least one force sensing resistor assembly, specifically, from a longitudinal centerline axis of the at least one force sensing resistor assembly.
According to another aspect of the above embodiment, the sensor assembly is curved and includes a first force sensing resistor assembly disposed at a first end of the sensor assembly and a second force sensing resistor assembly disposed at a second end of the sensor assembly. The interface member may also be curved and includes a rigid bridge configured to engage at least one of the first force sensing resistor assembly or the second force sensing resistor assembly due to the interface member contacting an obstruction.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a surgical robotic system is disclosed. The surgical robotic system includes a surgical robotic arm having a first link and a second link, wherein at least one of the first link or second link is movable relative to each other. The surgical robotic arm also includes a sensor assembly coupled to at least one of the first link or the second link. The sensor assembly includes: a force sensing resistor assembly configured to measure force; and an interface member disposed over the force sensing resistor assembly, the interface member configured to engage the force sensing resistor assembly in response to contacting an obstruction. The surgical robotic system also includes a control device coupled to the surgical robotic arm and the sensor assembly. The control device configured to control movement of the surgical robotic arm based on the force measured by the force sensing resistor assembly.
According to one aspect of any of the above embodiments, the force sensing resistor includes an upper conductive layer and a lower conductive substrate, the upper conductive layer configured to contact the lower conductive substrate in response to engagement with the interface member. An amount of contact between the upper conductive layer and the lower conductive substrate is representative of the force.
According to another aspect of the above embodiment, the control device is configured to determine connectivity of the force sensing resistor to the control device, and/or to detect the presence of broken cables or broken electrical traces or the like. In an embodiment, the sensor assembly may include a known finite resistance at zero-load, and wherein the method may recognize a failure in connectivity (e.g., broken cable, loose connector, broken sensor, etc.). In an embodiment, a resistor, of known resistance, may bridge an upper conductive layer and a lower conductive layer of the sensor assembly, wherein the resistor is located opposite a connector of the sensor assembly.
According to a further aspect of the above embodiment, the control device includes a memory storing a set of instructions and a processor configured to execute the set of instructions.
The memory may store a force threshold. The control device may be configured to: compare the force measured by the force sensing resistor assembly to the force threshold; and control at least one of the first link or second link based on the comparison of the force measured by the force sensing resistor assembly to the force threshold.
According to a further embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for controlling a surgical robotic arm is disclosed. The method includes: moving at least one of a first link or a second link of a surgical robotic arm; measuring a force exerted on a sensor assembly coupled to at least one of the first link or the second link of the surgical robotic arm; determining at a control device whether the force measured by the sensor assembly exceeds a first threshold corresponding to contact with an obstruction; and controlling movement of at least one of the first link or the second link of the surgical robotic arm based on the force measured by the sensor assembly exceeding the first threshold.
According to one aspect of the above embodiment, the method further includes: outputting an alert based on the force measured by the sensor assembly exceeding the first threshold.
According to another aspect of the above embodiment, the method further includes: comparing the force measured by the sensor assembly to a second threshold, which is lower than the first threshold; and outputting an alert based on the force measured by the sensor assembly exceeding the second threshold.
According to a further aspect of the above embodiment, the method further includes: stopping the surgical robotic arm based on the force measured by the sensor assembly exceeding the first threshold.
According to one aspect of the above embodiment, the method further includes: continuously monitoring a signal from the sensor assembly; and verifying connectivity of the sensor assembly based on an interruption of the signal from the sensor assembly. In an embodiment, the sensor assembly may include a known finite resistance at zero-load, and wherein the method may recognize a failure in connectivity (e.g., broken cable, loose connector, broken sensor, etc.). In an embodiment, the method includes providing a resistor, of known resistance, that bridges an upper conductive layer and a lower conductive substrate of the sensor assembly, wherein the resistor is located opposite a connector of the sensor assembly.
According to a further aspect of the above embodiment, the method further includes: measuring the force exerted on the sensor assembly includes contacting an upper conductive layer and a lower conductive substrate of the sensor assembly to the interface member contacting the obstruction.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a surgical robotic system is disclosed. The system includes a surgical robotic arm having a first link and a second link, wherein at least one of the first link or second link is movable relative to each other; and a sensor assembly coupled to at least one of the first link or the second link, the sensor assembly configured to sense physical contact. The system also includes a cart having: a base; a support mount attached to the base and configured to couple to the surgical robotic arm; a plurality of wheels coupled to the base; and at least one lighting element configured to indicate a status of the surgical robotic arm including the sensor assembly sensing physical contact.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Embodiments of the presently disclosed surgical robotic system are described in detail with reference to the drawings, in which like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding elements in each of the several views. As used herein the term “distal” refers to the portion of the surgical robotic system and/or the surgical instrument coupled thereto that is closer to the patient, while the term “proximal” refers to the portion that is farther from the patient.
As will be described in detail below, the present disclosure is directed to a surgical robotic system, which includes a robotic arm having a sensor assembly configured to sense force. The sensor assembly may be disposed on curved or straight portions of the robotic arm. The sensor assembly may be disposed in high injury risk zones on the links of the robotic arm, in particular, portions of links that may pinch or otherwise injure user's appendages or other body parts that may be trapped and crushed by the moving links of the robotic arm. The sensor assembly includes a force sensing resistor (“FSR”), and an elastomeric interface member disposed over the FSR. The surgical robotic system also includes a control device coupled to the FSR. The control device is configured to interpret a given level of resistance of the FSR as force, and correlate the measured force with the amount of physical contact of the robotic arm with a user. Thus, the control device is configured to recognize whether the robotic arm has contacted any obstructions. In embodiments, the sensitivity of the sensors can be adjusted, such that only force above a certain threshold is selected to be indicative of contact with the user or other obstructions. In response to detecting contact with the user, the control device may be configured to preemptively stop any movement of the robotic arm and/or the links where the contact was sensed and output a warning.
Referring initially to
Operating console 5 includes a display device 6, which displays the surgical site and manual input devices 7, 8, by which a clinician is able to remotely control robotic arms 2. Each of the robotic arms 2 may be composed of a plurality of links, which are connected through joints. Robotic arms 2 may be driven by electric drives (not shown) that are connected to control device 4. Control device 4 (e.g., a computer, a logic controller, etc.) is configured to activate the drives, based on a set of programmable instructions stored in memory, in such a way that robotic arms 2 and surgical instruments 10 execute a desired movement according to a movement in response to input from manual input devices 7, 8.
The control device 4 may include a processor (not shown) operably connected to a memory (not shown), which may include one or more of volatile, non-volatile, magnetic, optical, or electrical media, such as read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), electrically-erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), non-volatile RAM (NVRAM), or flash memory. The processor may be any suitable processor (e.g., control circuit) adapted to perform the operations, calculations, and/or set of instructions described in the present disclosure including, but not limited to, a hardware processor, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a digital signal processor (DSP), a central processing unit (CPU), a microprocessor, and combinations thereof. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the processor may be substituted for by using any logic processor (e.g., control circuit) adapted to execute algorithms, calculations, and/or set of instructions described herein.
Control device 4 may control a plurality of motors (e.g., motor 9 . . . n), each of which is configured to actuate the surgical instrument 10 to effect operation and/or movement of surgical instrument 10. It is contemplated that control device 4 coordinates the activation of the various motors (motor 9 . . . n) to coordinate a clockwise or counter-clockwise rotation of drive members (not shown) to coordinate operation and/or movement of the surgical instrument 10. In embodiments, each motor of the plurality of motors (motor 9 . . . n) can be configured to actuate a drive rod, cable, or a lever arm (not shown) to effect operation and/or movement of each surgical instrument 10.
For a detailed discussion of the construction and operation of a surgical robotic system, reference may be made to U.S. Pat. No. 8,828,023, filed on Nov. 3, 2011, entitled “Medical Workstation,” the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
With reference to
The first link 104 includes a curved base 105 configured to secure the robotic arm 2 to a movable base, such as movable cart or stand (not shown) or to a stationary base, such as the table 3. The second link 106 is rotatable at a joint 107 and about an axis “X-X” relative to the first link 104, such that an angle α defined by the first and second links 104 and 106 is from about 0° to about 140°. The third link 108 is rotatable at a joint 109 and about an axis “Y-Y” relative to the second link 106, such that an angle β defined by the second and third links 106 and 108 is from about 0° to about 140°. The holder 110 is rotatable relative to the third link 108 such that an angle θ defined by the holder 110 and the third link 108 is from about 25° to about 160°. Since the edges of the movable links of the robotic arm 2, namely, the first and second links 104 and 106, the second and third links 106 and 108, etc., are capable of being flush with each other, there is a possibility of trapping and crushing various obstructions, such as user's appendages, fingers, etc., between the links 104, 106, and 108 as well as the holder 110 of the robotic arm 2.
The present disclosure provides for a sensor system configured to detect physical contact between the movable links of the robotic arm 2 and to control the robotic arm 2. The robotic arm 2 may include one or more sensor assemblies 100 disposed on any link (e.g., the links 104, 106, and 108 and the holder 110) of the robotic arm 2. The sensor assemblies 100 may be disposed on any surface that present a high risk of crushing, shearing, or otherwise injuring body parts that may be caught by the robotic arm 2 during its movement. In embodiments, the sensor assemblies 100 may be disposed adjacent an inner edge (e.g., an edge that is closest to a neighboring link) of the first, second, and third links 104, 106, and 108, such as sensor assembly 30 of
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
The inner protuberance 42 extends from the inner surface 41 of the interface member 36 and is configured to contact the force sensing resistor assembly 34, without compressing it unless the interface member 36 is compressed. The outer and inner protuberances 40 and 42 may be offset from a center line “B-B” (
In embodiments, the force sensing resistor assembly 34 may be coupled directly to one of the first, second, or third links 104, 106, or 108, using adhesive or any suitable methods, thereby obviating the need for the base housing 32. In further embodiments, the interface member 36 may include a compartment therein to enclose the force sensing resistor assembly 34. The interface member 36 may then be secured to one of the first, second, or third links 104, 106, or 108.
The force sensing resistor assembly 34 includes an upper conductive layer 44 and a lower conductive substrate 46. The upper conductive layer 44 and the lower conductive substrate 46 may be formed from flexible polymer sheets including any suitable polymer, such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyimide, polycarbonate, etc. The inside surface of the upper conductive layer 44 may be coated with a conductive ink, such as a carbon-based ink. In embodiments, the upper conductive layer 44 may also be formed from a flexible conductive sheet, such as a deformable metal sheet.
As shown in
With reference to
During operation, the force sensing resistor assembly 34 senses force when the upper conductive layer 44 contacts the lower conductive substrate 46. Thus, the force sensing resistor assembly 34 is in an open circuit until the force sensing resistor assembly 34 is activated by the interface member 36. When the upper conductive layer 44 contacts the lower conductive substrate 46, the upper conductive layer 44 shorts across the interdigitated fingers of the electrode patterns 48a and 48b of the lower conductive substrate 46, transitioning from an open circuit to a short circuit. As the interface member 36 encounters an obstruction or is otherwise actuated by an external force (e.g., due to contact by a hand or appendage of clinician), the inner protuberance 42 of the interface member 36 presses down on the upper conductive layer 44, which in turn, contacts the lower conductive substrate 46. The amount of sensed force is based on the amount of surface area of the upper conductive layer 44 contacting the lower conductive substrate 46. In particular, the applied force changes the resistance of the force sensing resistor assembly 34 based on the amount of electrical contact between the electrode patterns 48a and 48b. The lower conductive substrate 46 may be formed from a graphite-based, pressure sensitive material that increases in electrical conductivity (reduced electrical resistance) proportional to the amount of pressure applied. The resistance is inversely proportional to the applied force and is then used by the control device 4 to determine the force.
With reference to
As illustrated in
With reference to
The interface member 56 includes an inner surface 56a having an inner protuberance 58. As shown in
With reference to
The first force sensing resistor assembly 64 is disposed at a first end portion 62a of the base housing 62 and the second force sensing resistor assembly 65 is disposed at a second end portion 62b of the base housing 62. The force sensing resistor assemblies 64 and 65 may be coupled to base housing 62 in the same manner as described above with respect to the base housing 32 and may include contacts (not shown) extending through the base housing 62 to electrically couple the force sensing resistor assemblies 64 and 65 to the control device 4. In addition, the base housing 62 may be coupled to curved base 105 of the first link 104 in a similar manner as the base housing 32 as described above.
The force sensing resistor assemblies 64 and 65 are substantially similar to the force sensing resistor assembly 34. In embodiments, the force sensing resistor assemblies 64 and 65 may have any suitable shape, including but not limited to rectangular or circular.
The interface member 66 has a substantially curved shape and includes a channel 70 defined on an inner surface 68 of the interface member 66. The channel 70 is configured to receive a bridge 72 therein. The bridge 72 may be formed from any rigid material, such as metals or rigid thermoplastic materials, such as those formed from polycarbonates and the like. The bridge 72 includes a protuberance 72a and 72b at each end thereof, which are configured to engage the first and second force sensing resistor assemblies 64 and 65, respectively, such that any force on the interface member 66 and the bridge 72 is applied to one or both of the force sensing resistor assemblies 64 and 65. The protuberances 72a and 72b may be separate parts that are fixed to the bridge 72 and made from an elastic material such as rubber, polymer, and the like to allow for self-alignment of the protuberances 72a and 72b contacting the force sensing resistor assemblies 64 and 65. The protuberances 72a and 72b may have any suitable shape, such as pads, fixed to the underside of the bridge 72 or o-rings fitted around the circumference of the bridge.
With reference to
In embodiments, the sensor assemblies 100 may continuously output a signal based on a minimum resistance of the sensor assemblies 100. The control device 4 may utilize this signal to verify electrical connectivity between the sensor assemblies 100 and the control device 4, e.g., due to cable failure or other electrical malfunctions.
The control device 4 is configured to calculate the force exerted on one or more sensor assemblies 100 (e.g., by using a transfer function or any other suitable method). The control device 4 may be programmed to perform a plurality of control functions on the robotic arm 2 based on the calculated force. In particular, the control device 4 may store one or more force thresholds, such that when the measured force exceeds the threshold, the control device 4 performs a programmed function. In embodiments, when the measured force exceeds a predetermined threshold, the control device 4 may stop any movement of the robotic arm 2 or at least one of the links 104, 106, and 108 of the robotic arm 2 that encounters the obstruction. The control device 4 may also output a warning (e.g., audio and/or visual alert) to the users. However, if the signals output by sensor assemblies 100 do not exceed any of the thresholds, the control device 4 continues to control the robotic arm 2 according to other routines and control functions.
In an embodiment, multiple round or straight force sensing resistor assemblies (e.g., force sensing resistor assemblies 34, 64 or 65) may be located under a single interface member (e.g., interface member 36 or 66), such as, for example, in a curved sensor assembly 60.
With continued reference to
With reference to
In another alternate embodiment, as illustrated in
In yet another alternate embodiment, as illustrated in
In an embodiment, and in accordance with the present disclosure, it is contemplated that a surface area of inner protuberances 42 or contact elements 33A-33C, that makes contact with respective force sensing resistor assemblies, may vary along a length of the force sensor assembly to offer a corresponding variation in sensitivity along the length of the force sensor assembly. Similarly, in an embodiment, a distance from inner protuberance 42 and spacer 50 of the force sensing resistor assembly, can vary along the length of the force sensor assembly to offer corresponding variation in sensitivity along the length of the force sensor assembly.
The base housing 132 includes a lid 133 that encloses an end portion 134a of the FSR assembly 134 (
With reference to
The lower conductive substrate 146 may be a printed flexible circuit board including an interdigitated circuit 148 having a first electrode pattern 148a and a second electrode pattern 148b. Each of the first and second electrode patterns 148a and 148b terminates in respective contact members 152a and 152b that are electrically coupled to a printed circuit board (“PCB”) 135 as shown in
In certain embodiments, the PCB 135 may not be fixedly secured within the base housing 132 providing the PCB 135 and the electrical connector 153 coupled thereto a certain degree of lateral movement along a surface of the base housing 132. This allows for the electrical connector 153 to align with a counterpart connector on the surgical robotic arm 2 during coupling of the sensor assembly 130 to the surgical robotic arm 2. In addition, the surgical robotic arm 2 may include a counterpart opening configured to accommodate the surface projection 132d. Thus the surface projection 132d provides physical protection to the connector 152 as well as orients and aligns the electrical connector 153.
The resistor 137a is coupled in parallel between the contact members 152a and 152b and provides a known finite resistance to an electrical circuit defined by the first and second electrode patterns 148a and 148b. The known resistance of the resistor 137a may be used to determine whether an electrical connection between the FSR assembly 134 and the surgical robotic arm 2 has been broken. In particular, the surgical robotic arm 2 is configured to output a sensor signal through the FSR assembly 134 during operation of the surgical robotic arm 2. Since the first and second electrode patterns 148a and 148b would not output an electrical signal unless contacted by the upper conductive layer 144, the surgical robotic arm 2 would not be able to distinguish between the FSR assembly 134 being disconnected and/or being non-functional since the FSR assembly 134 is designed as an open circuit that is closed by external contact. The presence of the resistor 137a alleviates this issue by providing a baseline resistance to the surgical robotic arm 2. Thus, whenever the first and second electrode patterns 148a and 148b are contacted by the upper conductive layer 144 due to external forces, the resistance would increase accordingly beyond the resistance of the resistor 137a signaling the surgical robotic arm 2 that external contact has been detected.
As shown in
Similarly, to the base housing 132 of the sensor assembly 130, the base housing 162 includes a lid 163 that encloses an end portion 164a of the FSR assembly 164. The base housing 162 includes a pair of openings 162e and 162f as well as an adhesive layer 169 disposed on a bottom portion of the base housing 162 (
With reference to
The lower conductive substrate 176 includes an interdigitated circuit 178 having a first electrode pattern 178a and a second electrode pattern 178b. The first and second electrode patterns 178a and 178b may define an opening 179 therebetween such that there are no finger electrodes at the opening 179. With reference to
The interface member 166 is substantially similar to the interface member 66 and also includes a curved shape and is configured to receive a bridge 172 therein. Similar to the bridge 72, the bridge 172 includes a pair of protuberances 172a and 172b at each end of the bridge 172. The protuberances 172a and 172b are configured to engage end portions 174a and 174b of the lower conductive substrate 176, respectively, such that any force on the interface member 166 and the bridge 172 is applied to the FSR assembly 164.
The protuberances 172a and 172b may be formed from any elastomeric material, which allows for the protuberances 172a and 172b to deform in response to the force applied on the bridge 172, thereby achieving a more uniform pressure on the first electrode pattern 178a and the second electrode pattern 178b and compensating for uneven contact surface of the protuberances 172a and 172b (e.g., which may exist due to low manufacturing tolerances).
As shown in
With reference to
In addition, the cart 300 also includes one or more lights 310. The lights 310 may be disposed around a perimeter of the base 302 and may be on at all times during use of the base 302 to increase its visibility. In embodiments, the lights 310 may be color-changing, dimmable light emitting diodes such that the controller 308 may adjust color and/or brightness/intensity of the lights 310. In addition to controlling lighting for visibility, the controller 308 may adjust the lighting pattern of the lights 310 to provide an indicator status of the robotic arm 2, such as green to denote normal operation, yellow to denote an issue with the robotic arm 2, etc. In addition, the lights 310 may also be operated in blinking patterns to provide additional feedback to the user.
In embodiments, the controller 308 is configured to communicate with the sensor assemblies 100 of the robotic arm 2, such that upon encountering a physical obstruction the controller 308, along with the control device 4, is notified of the event as disclosed above with respect to
In accordance with the present disclosure, it is envisioned and contemplated that any of the above embodiments may be applied to a sensor fixed to a curved or uneven surface. While force sensing resistor assemblies have been disclosed herein in detail, it is contemplated that other types of sensors may be used in a sensor assembly and applied to members of a robotic arm, to achieve the same or similar purposes described above. Such other sensors include and are not limited to strain gauges, piezoelectric sensors, limit switches, and the like.
It will be understood that various modifications may be made to the embodiments disclosed herein. In embodiments, the sensors may be disposed on any suitable portion of the robotic arm. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of various embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended thereto.
This application is a U.S. National Stage Application filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371(a) of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/018088, filed Feb. 14, 2018, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/459,318, filed Feb. 15, 2017, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/018088 | 2/14/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/152141 | 8/23/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4591944 | Gravel | May 1986 | A |
4691694 | Boyd | Sep 1987 | A |
5562843 | Yasumoto | Oct 1996 | A |
5691898 | Rosenberg | Nov 1997 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6206903 | Ramans | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441577 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491691 | Morley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493608 | Niemeyer | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6565554 | Niemeyer | May 2003 | B1 |
6645196 | Nixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6659939 | Moll | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676684 | Morley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685698 | Morley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699235 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714839 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716233 | Whitman | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728599 | Wang et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746443 | Morley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766204 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770081 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6772053 | Niemeyer | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783524 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6793652 | Whitman et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6793653 | Sanchez et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799065 | Niemeyer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6837883 | Moll et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839612 | Sanchez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840938 | Morley et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6843403 | Whitman | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6846309 | Whitman et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866671 | Tierney et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871117 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879880 | Nowlin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899705 | Niemeyer | May 2005 | B2 |
6902560 | Morley et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6936042 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6951535 | Ghodoussi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6974449 | Niemeyer | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6991627 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994708 | Manzo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066926 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7118582 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7125403 | Julian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155315 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7239940 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7306597 | Manzo | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7357774 | Cooper | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373219 | Nowlin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379790 | Toth et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386365 | Nixon | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391173 | Schena | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398707 | Morley et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7413565 | Wang et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7453227 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7524320 | Tierney et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7574250 | Niemeyer | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7594912 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7607440 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7666191 | Orban, III et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7682357 | Ghodoussi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689320 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695481 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7695485 | Whitman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7699855 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713263 | Niemeyer | May 2010 | B2 |
7725214 | Diolaiti | May 2010 | B2 |
7727244 | Orban, III et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741802 | Prisco | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756036 | Druke et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7757028 | Druke et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762825 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778733 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7803151 | Whitman | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806891 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819859 | Prisco et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819885 | Cooper | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824401 | Manzo et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7835823 | Sillman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843158 | Prisco | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7865266 | Moll et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7865269 | Prisco et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7886743 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899578 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907166 | Lamprecht et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7935130 | Williams | May 2011 | B2 |
7963913 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7983793 | Toth et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002767 | Sanchez | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004229 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012170 | Whitman et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8054752 | Druke et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062288 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8079950 | Stern et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8100133 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108072 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8120301 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8142447 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147503 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8151661 | Schena et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8155479 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175769 | Perrin | May 2012 | B2 |
8182469 | Anderson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8202278 | Orban, III et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206406 | Orban, III | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8210413 | Whitman et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8216250 | Orban, III et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8220468 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8256319 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8285517 | Sillman et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8315720 | Mohr et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8335590 | Costa et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8347757 | Duval | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374723 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8418073 | Mohr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419717 | Diolaiti et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423182 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8452447 | Nixon | May 2013 | B2 |
8454585 | Whitman | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8499992 | Whitman et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8508173 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8528440 | Morley et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529582 | Devengenzo et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540748 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8551116 | Julian et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562594 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8594841 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597182 | Stein et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8597280 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600551 | Itkowitz et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608773 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620473 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8624537 | Nowlin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634957 | Toth et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638056 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638057 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8644988 | Prisco et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8666544 | Moll et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668638 | Donhowe et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8746252 | McGrogan et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8749189 | Nowlin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8749190 | Nowlin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8758352 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8761930 | Nixon | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768516 | Diolaiti et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8786241 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790243 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8808164 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8816628 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821480 | Burbank | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8823308 | Nowlin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8827989 | Niemeyer | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828023 | Neff et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838270 | Druke et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852174 | Burbank | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8858547 | Brogna | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8862268 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8864751 | Prisco et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8864752 | Diolaiti et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8903546 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8903549 | Itkowitz et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8911428 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8912746 | Reid et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8942828 | Schecter | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8944070 | Guthart | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8989903 | Weir et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002518 | Manzo | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014856 | Manzo et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9016540 | Whitman et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9019345 | O'Grady et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9043027 | Durant et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9050120 | Swarup et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9055961 | Manzo et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9068628 | Solomon et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078684 | Williams | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9084623 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095362 | Dachs, II et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9096033 | Holop et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9101381 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9113877 | Whitman et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9138284 | Krom et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9144456 | Rosa et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9198730 | Prisco et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9204923 | Manzo et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226648 | Saadat et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9226750 | Weir et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9226761 | Burbank | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9232984 | Guthart et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9241766 | Duque et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9241767 | Prisco et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9241769 | Larkin et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9259275 | Burbank | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9259277 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9259281 | Griffiths et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9259282 | Azizian et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9261172 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9265567 | Orban, III et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9265584 | Itkowitz et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9283049 | Diolaiti et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9301811 | Goldberg et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9314307 | Richmond et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317651 | Nixon | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9345546 | Toth et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9393017 | Flanagan et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9402689 | Prisco et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9417621 | Diolaiti | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9424303 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9433418 | Whitman et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9446517 | Burns et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9452020 | Griffiths et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9474569 | Manzo et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9480533 | Devengenzo et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9503713 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9550300 | Danitz et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9554859 | Nowlin et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9566124 | Prisco et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9579164 | Itkowitz et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585641 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9615883 | Schena et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9623563 | Nixon | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9623902 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629520 | Diolaiti | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9662177 | Weir et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9664262 | Donlon et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9687310 | Nowlin | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9687312 | Dachs, II et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9700334 | Hinman et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9718190 | Larkin et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9730719 | Brisson et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737199 | Pistor et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9795446 | DiMaio et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9797484 | Solomon et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9801690 | Larkin et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9814530 | Weir et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9814536 | Goldberg et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9814537 | Itkowitz et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9820823 | Richmond et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827059 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827679 | Kuth | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9830371 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9839481 | Blumenkranz et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9839487 | Dachs, II | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9850994 | Schena | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9855102 | Blumenkranz | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9855107 | Labonville et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9872737 | Nixon | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9877718 | Weir et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9883920 | Blumenkranz | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9888974 | Niemeyer | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9895813 | Blumenkranz | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9901408 | Larkin | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9918800 | Itkowitz et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9943375 | Blumenkranz et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9948852 | Lilagan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9949798 | Weir | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9949802 | Cooper | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9952107 | Blumenkranz et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9956044 | Gomez et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980778 | Ohline et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10008017 | Itkowitz et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10028793 | Griffiths et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10033308 | Chaghajerdi et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10034719 | Richmond et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10052167 | Au et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10085811 | Weir et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10092344 | Mohr et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10123844 | Nowlin | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10188471 | Brisson | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10201390 | Swarup et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10213202 | Flanagan et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10258416 | Mintz et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10265854 | Chen | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10278782 | Jarc et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10278783 | Itkowitz et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10282881 | Itkowitz et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10335242 | Devengenzo et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10368878 | Lavallee | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10405934 | Prisco et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10433922 | Itkowitz et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10464219 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10485621 | Morrissette et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10500004 | Hanuschik et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10500005 | Weir et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10500007 | Richmond et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10507066 | DiMaio et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10510267 | Jarc et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10524871 | Liao | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10548459 | Itkowitz et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10575909 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10592529 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10595946 | Nixon | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10786327 | Anderson | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10881469 | Robinson | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10881473 | Itkowitz et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10898188 | Burbank | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10898189 | McDonald, II | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10905506 | Itkowitz et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10912544 | Brisson et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10912619 | Jarc et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10918387 | Duque et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10918449 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10932873 | Griffiths et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10932877 | Devengenzo et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10939969 | Swarup et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10939973 | DiMaio et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10952801 | Miller et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10965933 | Jarc | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10966742 | Rosa et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10973517 | Wixey | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10973519 | Weir et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10984567 | Itkowitz et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10993771 | Srimohanarajah | May 2021 | B2 |
10993773 | Cooper et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
10993775 | Cooper et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11000331 | Krom et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11013567 | Wu et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11020138 | Ragosta | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11020191 | Diolaiti et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11020193 | Wixey et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11026755 | Weir et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11026759 | Donlon et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11040189 | Vaders et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11045077 | Stern et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11045274 | Dachs, II et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11058501 | Tokarchuk et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11076925 | DiMaio et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11090119 | Burbank | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11096687 | Flanagan et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11098803 | Duque et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11109925 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11116578 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11129683 | Steger et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11135029 | Suresh et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11147552 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11147640 | Jarc et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11154373 | Abbott et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11154374 | Hanuschik et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11160622 | Goldberg et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11160625 | Wixey et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11161243 | Rabindran et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11166758 | Mohr et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11166770 | DiMaio et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11166773 | Ragosta et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11173597 | Rabindran et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11185378 | Weir et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11191596 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11197729 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11213360 | Hourtash et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
11221863 | Azizian et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
11234700 | Ragosta et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11241274 | Vaders et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11241290 | Waterbury et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11259870 | DiMaio et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11259884 | Burbank | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11272993 | Gomez et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11272994 | Saraliev et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11291442 | Wixey et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11291513 | Manzo et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
20020045888 | Ramans | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030079549 | Lokhorst et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040130528 | Baker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050093821 | Massie | May 2005 | A1 |
20050259069 | Baker et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20090248038 | Blumenkranz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100077868 | Joung | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20130168336 | Kim et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150051733 | Nowlin et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160113720 | Lavallee | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160207197 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160279796 | Naitou et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160346935 | Nakayama et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361125 | Balicki et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180036884 | Chen | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180071029 | Srimohanarajah | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180092706 | Anderson | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20200253678 | Hulford | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210085424 | Hulford | Mar 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101227870 | Jul 2008 | CN |
102525582 | Jul 2012 | CN |
2280662 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2001287189 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002254384 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003071778 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004022791 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2006250705 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2016132080 | Jul 2016 | JP |
2017009289 | Jan 2017 | JP |
2017015599 | Jan 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Supplementary European Search Report dated Nov. 23, 2020 issued in corresponding EP Appln. No 18754323.6. |
Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2021 issued in corresponding JP Appln. No. 2019-541427. |
Indian Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2021 issued in corresponding IN Appln. No. 201917025728. |
International Search Report dated May 28, 2018 and Written Opinion completed May 28, 2018, corresponding to counterpart Int'l Patent Application PCT/US2018/018088. |
Cirillo et al.: “A Proximity/Contact-Force Sensor for Human Safety in Industrial Robot Environment”; ResearchGate; Conference Paper Jul. 2013; <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261270528> retrieved on Sep. 27, 2016. |
Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese application 201880005472.2 dated Apr. 25, 2022, together with English language translation (29 pages). |
Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2022 issued in corresponding JP Appln. No. 2019-541427. |
Australian Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2022, issued in corresponding Australian application No. 2018221456, 3 pages. |
Australian Examination Report issued in corresponding application AU 2018221456 dated Oct. 5, 2022 (3 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200000536 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62459318 | Feb 2017 | US |