The disclosure relates generally to a material, device, and method for predictably and consistently cleaning tester interface contact elements and support hardware such as probe-cards and test sockets.
Individual semiconductor (integrated circuit) devices are typically produced by creating a plurality of devices on a semiconductor wafer using well known semiconductor processing techniques that can include photolithography, deposition, and sputtering. Generally, these processes are intended to create fully-functional integrated circuit devices (ICs) at the wafer level. Eventually, the individual IC devices are singulated, or diced, into the separate and individual dies from the semiconductor wafer. The singulated IC devices are assembled for final completion in packages or incorporation into electronic apparatus using well known assembly techniques that can include die attach to a lead-frame, wire bonding or solder ball attach, and encapsulation usually by various molding techniques to provide a body to the package with external electrical connectivity.
In practice, however, physical defects in the wafer itself and/or defects in the processing of the wafer can inevitably lead to some of the dies on the wafer being either fully functional, some of the dies being non-functional, and some of the dies have lower performance or in need of repair. It is generally desirable to identify which of the dies on a wafer are fully functional preferably prior to singulation from the wafer and assembly into consumer devices. Non-functional, lower performing, and repairable devices due to certain physical defects in the wafer, defects in the IC circuit layers, and/or defects related to the semiconductor processing techniques can be identified prior to singulation by a process called wafer-level test (often referred to in the arts as “wafer sort”). Sorting, or binning, IC devices at the wafer level according to the product's capabilities where the product performance is determined by electrical testing can save the manufacturer considerable costs later in the manufacturing process as well as provide increased revenue from the sales of the highest performing devices.
Once the device has been singulated, certain process steps during handling and assembly can inevitably lead to dicing defects, handling defects, assembly and packaging related defects that can only be identified electrically to bin devices as fully-functional, non-functional, or potentially “repair-able”. In practice, assembled and packaged semiconductor devices are subject to a series of electrical testing processes prior to their final completion or incorporation into electronic apparatus. The process at package level or final test prior to shipment includes, but is not limited to, testing of singulated devices either bare die, packaged IC (temporary or permanent), or variants in between.
Commonly, electrical testing of the IC devices at either the wafer level or package level is accomplished by means of automatic test equipment (ATE) configured mechanically and electrically for stimulating the semiconductor devices, exercising the device according to adaptive testing techniques and functional routines, and examining the output for assessing proper functionality.
At wafer level test, conventional interface hardware is a “probe card” to which pluralities of probe elements that match the layout of the device under test (DUT) input/output (I/0) pads, power, GND and process monitoring pins are connected. More specifically, in the typical wafer testing process, the probe card is mounted to the prober, and probe contact elements (simply referred to as “probes”) are brought into contact with bonding pads, solder balls, bumps, pillars, or pillar bumps formed on the dies of the wafer. By exerting controlled displacement of the probe tips against the bonding pads, solder balls, bumps, pillars, or pillar bumps an electrical connection is achieved allowing the power, ground and test signals to be transmitted. Repeated scrub, deformation, and penetration of the probe tips against the bonding pads, solder balls, bumps, pillars, or pillar bumps produces debris and contaminants that adhere and accumulate onto the probe contact surface.
At the package level test, a tester load board provides an interface between automated test equipment (ATE), or manual test equipment, and the DUT. The tester load board conventionally includes one or more contactor assemblies, sometimes referred to as “test socket(s)” into which DUT(s) is (are) inserted. During the testing process, a DUT is inserted or placed into the socket by the handler and held into position for the duration of testing. After insertion into the socket, the DUT, via the pin elements, is electrically connected to the ATE through the tester load board, its subassemblies, and other interfacing apparatus. Contact pin elements associated with the ATE are placed in physical and electrical contact with the metallized contact surfaces of the DUT. These surfaces may include test pads, lead wire, pin connectors, bond pads, solder balls, and/or other conductive media. The functionality, static and dynamic performance tests of DUTs is evaluated through various electrical inputs and measured responses on outputs. With repeated testing, the contact element tip can become contaminated with materials such as aluminum, copper, lead, tin, gold, bi-products, organic films or oxides resulting from the wafer and semiconductor device manufacturing and testing processes.
One of the major challenges encountered with both types of IC testing (wafer level and package level) is ensuring optimal electrical contact between the contact pins associated with the contactor element, and the contact surfaces of the DUT. In each test procedure, with repeated contact the pin contact elements onto bonding pads, solder balls, bumps, pillars, or pillar bumps, debris and other residuals will accumulate and contaminate the contact area of the pin elements. This debris may originate from the testing and handling process itself or may include manufacturing residue from the device fabrication and/or assembly process(es) or from other sources.
In addition to the presence of contaminants, repeatedly forcing electrical current through the small intermetallic “a-spots” of the contact pins can degrade the conductivity characteristics of contact surfaces, thus affecting the inter-metallic quality for proper electrical testing. As the contaminants accumulate, coupled with degradation of contact surfaces, the contact resistance (CRES) rises and reduces the reliability of the tests. Increasing and unstable CRES can impact yield and/or test time as yield recovery testing increases. Such erroneous readings can lead to the false rejection of otherwise good DUTs resulting in, often dramatic, yield loss. Yield recovery may be possible through multi-pass testing; however, retesting devices multiple times to verify a device or to attain yield recovery causes the overall production costs to increase, reduce throughput, affect assembly, and create a possibility for reductions in long-term reliability.
High performance demands for wafer level and package level test contactor technologies have furthered the development of uniquely shaped and customized contact elements with predetermined and engineered mechanical and electrical performance properties. Many of the new advanced contact technologies have unique contact element geometries and mechanical behavior to facilitate consistent, repeatable, and stable electrical contact. Some of the technologies are constructed using lithographic assembly techniques, some are built using MEMS based processes; while others are fabricated with high accuracy micro-machining techniques. Improved electrical characteristics of the contactors are also attained using various materials with improved electrical performance and resistance to oxidation. The contact elements are engineered to facilitate consistent oxide penetration while reducing the applied bearing force onto the bonding pads, solder balls, bumps, pillars, or pillar bumps. However, it is still necessary to make physical contact with the bonding pads, solder balls, bumps, pillars, or pillar bumps; thereby, generating debris and contamination that could affect the results from the electrical performance testing procedures.
Typically, the generated debris needs to be periodically removed from the contact elements to prevent a build-up that causes increased contact resistance, continuity failures and false test indications, which in turn result in artificially lower yields and subsequent increased product costs and reduced throughput.
In response to the problem of particles adhering to the contact element and supporting hardware, a few techniques have been developed. For example, one technique uses cleaning materials composed of a silicone rubber which provides a matrix for abrasive particles. In addition, a cleaning wafer, or a cleaning medium mounted onto an abrasive ceramic cleaning block which is rubbed against the probe needles may be used or a rubber matrix with abrasive particles and a brush cleaner made of glass fibers also may be used. In one technique, the probe needles may be sprayed or dipped in a cleaning solution. In another technique, open cell foam based cleaning device with a random surface morphology of voids and variable heights may be used.
In one conventional contact element cleaning process, some combination of brushing, blowing, and rinsing the contact pins and/or contactor bodies are employed. This process requires stopping the testing operation, manual intervention to perform the cleaning, and possibly removing the test interface (probe card, socket, etc.) from the test environment. This method provides inconsistent debris removal and may not provide sufficient cleaning action within the geometric features of shaped contact elements. After cleaning, the test interface must be reinstalled, and the test environment reestablished so that testing may resume. In some cases, the contact elements are removed, cleaned, and replaced resulting in elevated costs due to unscheduled equipment downtime.
In another conventional method, a cleaning pad with an abrasive surface coating or abrasively coated polyurethane foam layer is used to remove foreign materials adhering to the contact elements. Adherent foreign materials are abraded off the contact elements and supporting hardware by repeatedly scrubbing the contact elements against (and possibly into) the cleaning pad. The process of cleaning using an abrasive pad burnishes the contact element, but it does not necessarily remove debris. In fact, the burnishing causes abrasive wear to the contact elements thereby changing the shape of the contact geometry, changing the contact performance, and shortening the useful life of the contactor.
Maximum cleaning efficiency is attained when the removal of the debris from the contact element and supporting hardware is performed consistently and predictably during the cleaning process without affecting the performance of the contact elements. The process of cleaning using an abrasive pad constructed from open celled foam does not provide consistent cleaning. In fact, the burnishing action by the randomly oriented and uncontrolled foam structures causes non-uniform abrasive wear as well as preferential abrasive wear to the contact elements thereby unpredictably changing the shape of the contact geometry and mechanical performance of the contact element and support hardware; thereby, unpredictably shortening the useful life of the contactor.
In the industry, it has been seen that the tester interface hardware consisting of a plurality of contact elements, as many as 150,000 test probe elements, and the support hardware can cost more than $1M per ATE test cell. Premature wear-out and damage due to improper or non-optimal cleaning practices can equate to millions of US dollars per annum per ATE test cell. Therefore, with tens of thousands of ATE test cells operating worldwide, the impact to the repair, maintenance, and replacement costs can be very substantial.
Another attempt to improve upon the conventional probe cleaning process includes using a tacky abrasively filled or unfilled polymeric cleaning material to remove the foreign materials. More specifically, the polymer pad is brought into physical contact with the contact elements. Adherent debris is loosened by the tacky polymer and sticks to the polymer surface; thereby removed from the contact elements and other test hardware. The polymer materials are designed to maintain the overall shape of the contact elements; however, interaction with the polymer layer may not provide sufficient cleaning action within the geometric features of shaped contact elements.
When cleaning with abrasively filled or abrasively coated materials films that have a continuous, uniform surface or a surface with randomly oriented and randomly spaced surface features, preferential abrasion is manifested through “edge pin” effects (for example, peripheral contact elements of a test probe array are abrasively worn at different rates than the contact element within the array); or through “neighbor pin spacing” effects (for example, closely spaced contact elements are worn at different rates than widely spaced contact elements); or through “neighbor pin orientation” effects (for example, spatial proximity of contact elements can cause preferential and asymmetric wear of contact elements). Non-uniform abrasive wear of contact elements and support hardware will affect the performance consistency during the IC semiconductor device testing and could result in unexpected yield loss, equipment downtime, and repair costs.
Typical contact element cleaning processes at wafer level and package level can be expensive for the end-user since the contactors may be uncontrollably worn away at different rates by the abrasive-based contact cleaning processes. When using abrasive particles of the rate of wear-out or dimensional reduction for critical contact element geometries can be dramatically affected by relatively small changes (approximately 2 to 3%) to the compliance of the abrasive material layers, surface features, and that of the under-layers. With thousands of IC device testing units (probers and handlers) operating worldwide, the impact to the industry from maintaining clean contact elements without premature wear out during testing can be very substantial.
None of these methods adequately clean these testing machines nor the contact elements of these testing machines that have critical contact element geometries. Accordingly, there is a need for improved methods and apparatuses for cleaning and maintaining the contact elements.
The disclosure is particularly applicable to a cleaning pad for electrical test probes that have contact elements with predetermined geometries and mechanical performance. The contact elements being cleaned can be any type of test probe, such as cantilever wire needles, vertical probes, cobra probes, MEMS type vertical and MEMS type microcantilever probes, plunger probes, spring probes, sliding contacts, contact bump probes formed on a membrane, etc., and the associated support structures used for tester interface devices utilized for wafer level and package level testing (i.e., probe cards, test sockets, and other similar interface devices). It is in this context that the disclosure will be described; however, it can be appreciated that the cleaning material, device, and method have greater utility, such as cleaning test interfaces utilized by other types of IC semiconductor device evaluation equipment, such as spring pin ring interfaces, ZIFF male/female connectors, etc.
In one embodiment, a cleaning device and method are disclosed that incorporate a cleaning pad construction with a surface functionalization, or surface tunability. Surface functionalization with predetermined microfeatures of custom geometries effectively facilitates adjustable behavior altering the mechanical properties of a cleaning surface in order to achieve specific performance goals such as contact surface cleaning, tip shaping, debris removal and collection, and surface texturing. Materials with structurally functionalized well-regulated structures surfaces contain microscale features that are produced in a controlled manner through imprinting, molding, casting, coating, film deposition, spray deposition or other surface modifications at a microscale level, with the purpose for improving the material cleaning efficiency and mechanical performance. In addition, the equipment and manual labor to repair and replace contactors that have been worn away by an abrasive contact cleaning process adds additional costs to the task performed.
In one embodiment, the cleaning material may be a complaint, semi-rigid, or rigid media that has a surface functionalized with 3-dimensional (3D) microfeatures that provide performance characteristics not possible with flat, non-functionalized surfaces for having specific abrasive and debris removal efficacies to clean electrical contact elements and structures used for tester interfaces devices utilized for wafer level and package level testing (i.e., probe cards, test socket, and other similar interface devices). Surface functionalization, or surface tunability, with adjustable behavior is an effective way for altering the mechanical properties of a cleaning surface to achieve specific performance goals such as contact surface cleaning, tip shaping, debris removal and collection, and surface texturing. Materials with structurally functionalized surfaces contain microscale features that are produced in a controlled manner through imprinting, molding, casting, coating, film deposition, spray deposition or other surface modifications at a microscale level, with the purpose for improving the material cleaning efficiency and mechanical performance.
In one embodiment, a functionalized coating with predetermined properties, such as thickness, hardness, tack, etc., can be applied to the surface of the cleaning pad, across existing structural features, and across microfeatures to provide a new class of cleaning materials that can be tailored and optimized for electrical contact elements and structures applications and perform a well-defined set of functions. A high level of cleaning efficacy can be obtained through functionalizing the cleaning surface in order to emulate the pads, bumps, or pillars of a semiconductor device combined with tacky or abrasive surface coatings, exposed abrasive particles for variable abrasive efficiency, and depending on the type and shape of contact elements being cleaned, the composition and the quantity of debris to be removed, and the affinity of the debris to the contact surface.
In more detail, a functionalized cleaning material may be constructed with the predetermined pads, bumps, or pillars surface features or functional surface coatings on top of one or more support layers, each with predetermined mechanical, material, and dimensional characteristics, such as abrasiveness, density, elasticity, tackiness, planarity, thickness, porosity, etc. The cleaning device may have a sacrificial top protective layer of material that may be applied before, during, or after the fabrication process to protect and isolate the cleaning material surface from contamination during manufacturing process and manual handling operations. The sacrificial layer is removed upon installation into the semiconductor or other testing equipment and is used to ensure that the working surface of the cleaning material is free of any contamination that would compromise the cleaning performance of the contact elements by cleaning material.
The cleaning layer and functionalized 3D-surface features may be made of solid elastomeric materials or porous, open celled or closed foam materials that may include rubbers and both synthetic and natural polymers as well as polyurethanes, acrylics, etc., or other known elastomeric materials. The functionalized surface features may have predetermined abrasiveness, elasticity, density and surface energy parameters that may allow the contact elements to deform and penetrate the elastomeric material to remove the debris from the contact area without damage to the geometry of the contact elements, while retaining the integrity of the elastomeric matrix.
The cleaning material also may have a multi-layered structure in which one or more complaint layers are arranged or stacked to attain a predetermined overall performance so that when the pin or contact elements touch and deform the functionalized features and the pad surface, a defined reciprocal force is imparted by the material into the contact area and 3D structures to increase the efficiency at which the debris and contaminants are removed.
In one embodiment (examples of which are shown in
In other embodiments, the “positive” and “negative” microfeatures may have abrasive particles applied to the top surface, along the length of the microfeature, within the body of the microfeature, or at the base of the micro-feature. In particular, a typical microfeature (whether a positive microfeature or a negative microfeature) could have varying cross-section widths of 15-μm or less, with a height of 400-μm or less, at a spacing of 250-μm or less and an average abrasive particle size of less than 30 um. Typical abrasives that may be incorporated into and across the material layers and features may include aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, tantalum oxide, and diamond although the abrasive particles may also be other well-known abrasive materials with Mohs Hardness of 7 or greater.
In other embodiments, the microfeatures are built, molded, or formed with a predetermined geometry to attain a predetermined compliance and movement so that when the pin or contact elements touch the pad surface, a reciprocal force is imparted by the material into the contact area, within the contact element tip geometry, and support structures to increase the efficiency at which the debris and contaminates are removed. The functional microfeatures have predetermined dimensions to provide predictable and uniform reciprocal forces onto each test probe within the contact element array and supporting hardware.
In another aspect of the cleaning device, the micro-features may have a particular surface matte or patterned texture or finish such that the prober/tester device is capable of detecting the surface of the cleaning pad. The surface texture and roughness of the cleaning material may also contribute to the cleaning efficiency of the working surface polymer material.
In one aspect of the method, the cleaning medium may be manually placed within the automated test equipment, such as a wafer prober or packaged device handler, in a predetermined location so that pin elements and surfaces will interact with the cleaning medium periodically to remove debris and/or clean the contact surfaces of the pin or contact elements without excessively wearing out the test probe. In another aspect of the method, a method for cleaning the probe elements on a wafer prober or package device handler is provided wherein the method comprises loading the cleaning medium into the wafer prober or package device handler in a form similar to a semiconductor wafer, a singulated IC device, or a packaged IC device being tested and the cleaning medium having a top surface of functionalized microfeatures that have predetermined properties, such as abrasiveness, tack, hardness, that clean the contact elements and support structure. The method further comprises contacting the contact elements with the cleaning medium during the normal testing operation in wafer prober or package device handler so that any debris is removed from the probe elements during the normal operation of the wafer prober or package device handler.
When the prober/tester can detect the surface of the cleaning pad, then the prober is able to be set into an automatic cleaning mode. In the automatic cleaning mode, the prober/tester will automatically determine when to clean the test probe contact elements, locate the cleaning device, clean the probe tips and then return to testing operations. After repeated touchdowns on the devices under test (DUTs), pad materials and other surface contaminants will be accumulated on the test probe contact elements as well as the test probe length. Such loose debris can substantially increase the contact resistance, leading to decreased wafer and package yields. High contact resistance or consecutive failing devices (binouts) can trigger the tester to send a command to the semiconductor device handling machine such that a cleaning operation is executed with an “on demand” functionality.
Alternatively, the semiconductor device handling machine can be programmed to execute the cleaning operation at LOT start, LOT end, or after a predetermined number of device touchdowns. As a result, scheduled and efficient cleaning procedure is very critical in controlling contact resistance.
In another embodiment of the cleaning device, the layers of the cleaning medium may be formed from conductive, insulative or resistive materials such that a tester/prober that detects a surface using conductance or capacitive method is able to detect the surface of the cleaning medium.
A typical IC semiconductor testing system (shown schematically in
Now, a cleaning medium with functional microfeatures is described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. As shown, for example in
In an embodiment of the cleaning medium 221 (shown in
As an example of one type of functional “positive” microfeature construction, the microfeatures shown in
The dimensions of the “positive” features may have a base-to-top of each microfeature above the base reference plane 408 of 25 um to 500 um, a top surface area geometry which can be flat or shaped and that has dimensions ranging in XY dimensions from 20 um up to the XY dimensions of the microfeature base, sides of the positive feature can be straight or curved, and plateau-to-plateau spacing (the distance between each microfeature) of 50 um to 250 um.
In an another embodiment of the cleaning medium 221 (shown in
As an example of one type of functional “negative” microfeature construction, the microfeatures shown in
The dimensions of the “negative” features may have a base-to-top of each microfeature below the base reference plane 608 of 25 um to 500 um, a bottom surface area geometry which can be flat or shaped and that has dimensions ranging in XY dimensions from 20 um up to the XY dimensions of the microfeature opening, sides of the negative feature can be straight or curved, and bottom-to-bottom spacing (the distance between each microfeature) of 50 um to 250 um.
Another embodiment of the cleaning pad/media/device with the functionalized microfeatures is shown in
FIGS. 8D-8F that show examples of enlarged sectional views of a cleaning material 800 with “positive” microfeatures layer (with micro-pyramids 802, micro-columns 804, curved micro-pyramids 806) underneath a layer of polymer 10 to 100 um thick with predetermined properties that has been applied across the surface of the “positive” features (801, 803, and 805, respectively). The microfeatured cleaning pad layer can then be constructed onto a one or more intermediate complaint or rigid material layers below a cleaning pad layer of predetermined properties and a protective liner.
Another embodiment of the cleaning pad/media/device with the functionalized microfeatures is shown in
Now, another embodiment of the cleaning device will be described wherein the cleaning device may be used for cleaning contact elements that are used to electrically test the DUTs wherein an individual semiconductor device from the wafer has been encapsulated into a material 501, such as plastic, as shown in
Similar to the probe card cleaner embodiment, the cleaning device for the encapsulated device may approximate a DUT shape with a substrate onto which the cleaning pad material 503 has been applied as shown in
In
In another embodiment,
Now, a method for cleaning a plurality of probe elements and supporting hardware or solder balls using the disclosed cleaning devices with functionalized microfeatures will be described with reference to
As described above, this cleaning step may occur either when the cleaning device is periodically installed from the cleaning tray positioned under the contact elements of tester interface or every time from the wafer cassette, or anytime the ATE executes a cleaning operation of the contact elements with the cleaning material installed onto the burnishing plate. Use of the cleaning device does not interrupt, in any way, the operation of the ATE since the cleaning of the contact elements is accomplished during the normal operation of the testing machine. In this manner, the cleaning device is inexpensive and permits the contact element to be cleaned and/or shaped without removing the contact elements or tester interface from the ATE.
The methods and apparatus provide one or more advantages including but not limited to maintaining clean contactors and contact pins. While the disclosure has been described with reference to certain illustrative embodiments, those described herein are not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. For example, variations or combinations of steps in the embodiments shown and described may be used in particular cases without departure from the disclosure. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments as well as other advantages and embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to persons skilled in the arts upon reference to the drawings, description, and claims. It is intended that the scope of the disclosure be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents. While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodiment of the invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from the principles and spirit of the disclosure, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
In contrast,
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the disclosure and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
The system and method disclosed herein may be implemented via one or more components, systems, servers, appliances, other subcomponents, or distributed between such elements. When implemented as a system, such systems may include an/or involve, inter alia, components such as software modules, general-purpose CPU, RAM, etc. found in general-purpose computers. In implementations where the innovations reside on a server, such a server may include or involve components such as CPU, RAM, etc., such as those found in general-purpose computers.
Additionally, the system and method herein may be achieved via implementations with disparate or entirely different software, hardware and/or firmware components, beyond that set forth above. With regard to such other components (e.g., software, processing components, etc.) and/or computer-readable media associated with or embodying the present inventions, for example, aspects of the innovations herein may be implemented consistent with numerous general purpose or special purpose computing systems or configurations. Various exemplary computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the innovations herein may include, but are not limited to: software or other components within or embodied on personal computers, servers or server computing devices such as routing/connectivity components, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, consumer electronic devices, network PCs, other existing computer platforms, distributed computing environments that include one or more of the above systems or devices, etc.
In some instances, aspects of the system and method may be achieved via or performed by logic and/or logic instructions including program modules, executed in association with such components or circuitry, for example. In general, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular instructions herein. The inventions may also be practiced in the context of distributed software, computer, or circuit settings where circuitry is connected via communication buses, circuitry or links. In distributed settings, control/instructions may occur from both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
The software, circuitry and components herein may also include and/or utilize one or more type of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that is resident on, associable with, or can be accessed by such circuits and/or computing components. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and can accessed by computing component. Communication media may comprise computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and/or other components. Further, communication media may include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, however no media of any such type herein includes transitory media. Combinations of the any of the above are also included within the scope of computer readable media.
In the present description, the terms component, module, device, etc. may refer to any type of logical or functional software elements, circuits, blocks and/or processes that may be implemented in a variety of ways. For example, the functions of various circuits and/or blocks can be combined with one another into any other number of modules. Each module may even be implemented as a software program stored on a tangible memory (e.g., random access memory, read only memory, CD-ROM memory, hard disk drive, etc.) to be read by a central processing unit to implement the functions of the innovations herein. Or, the modules can comprise programming instructions transmitted to a general purpose computer or to processing/graphics hardware via a transmission carrier wave. Also, the modules can be implemented as hardware logic circuitry implementing the functions encompassed by the innovations herein. Finally, the modules can be implemented using special purpose instructions (SIMD instructions), field programmable logic arrays or any mix thereof which provides the desired level performance and cost.
As disclosed herein, features consistent with the disclosure may be implemented via computer-hardware, software and/or firmware. For example, the systems and methods disclosed herein may be embodied in various forms including, for example, a data processor, such as a computer that also includes a database, digital electronic circuitry, firmware, software, or in combinations of them. Further, while some of the disclosed implementations describe specific hardware components, systems and methods consistent with the innovations herein may be implemented with any combination of hardware, software and/or firmware. Moreover, the above-noted features and other aspects and principles of the innovations herein may be implemented in various environments. Such environments and related applications may be specially constructed for performing the various routines, processes and/or operations according to the invention or they may include a general-purpose computer or computing platform selectively activated or reconfigured by code to provide the necessary functionality. The processes disclosed herein are not inherently related to any particular computer, network, architecture, environment, or other apparatus, and may be implemented by a suitable combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. For example, various general-purpose machines may be used with programs written in accordance with teachings of the invention, or it may be more convenient to construct a specialized apparatus or system to perform the required methods and techniques.
Aspects of the method and system described herein, such as the logic, may also be implemented as functionality programmed into any of a variety of circuitry, including programmable logic devices (“PLDs”), such as field programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), programmable array logic (“PAL”) devices, electrically programmable logic and memory devices and standard cell-based devices, as well as application specific integrated circuits. Some other possibilities for implementing aspects include: memory devices, microcontrollers with memory (such as EEPROM), embedded microprocessors, firmware, software, etc. Furthermore, aspects may be embodied in microprocessors having software-based circuit emulation, discrete logic (sequential and combinatorial), custom devices, fuzzy (neural) logic, quantum devices, and hybrids of any of the above device types. The underlying device technologies may be provided in a variety of component types, e.g., metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (“MOSFET”) technologies like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (“CMOS”), bipolar technologies like emitter-coupled logic (“ECL”), polymer technologies (e.g., silicon-conjugated polymer and metal-conjugated polymer-metal structures), mixed analog and digital, and so on.
It should also be noted that the various logic and/or functions disclosed herein may be enabled using any number of combinations of hardware, firmware, and/or as data and/or instructions embodied in various machine-readable or computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, and/or other characteristics. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, non-volatile storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media) though again does not include transitory media. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number respectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “hereunder,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. When the word “or” is used in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list and any combination of the items in the list.
Although certain presently preferred implementations of the invention have been specifically described herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains that variations and modifications of the various implementations shown and described herein may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only to the extent required by the applicable rules of law.
While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodiment of the disclosure, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from the principles and spirit of the disclosure, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2971208 | Moore et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
3453677 | Cutler | Jul 1969 | A |
3644953 | Christiansen | Feb 1972 | A |
3675265 | Landen et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3945079 | Westberg | Mar 1976 | A |
4104755 | Smith | Aug 1978 | A |
4277160 | Yamada | Jul 1981 | A |
4334780 | Pernick | Jun 1982 | A |
4590422 | Milligan | May 1986 | A |
5011513 | Zador et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5192455 | Marcel | Mar 1993 | A |
5205460 | Sato et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5220279 | Nagasawa | Jun 1993 | A |
5444265 | Hamilton | Aug 1995 | A |
5485949 | Tomura et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5507874 | Su et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5597346 | Hempel, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
5652428 | Nishioka et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5671119 | Huang et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685043 | LaManna et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690749 | Lee | Nov 1997 | A |
5699584 | Wieloch et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5746928 | Yen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766061 | Bowers | Jun 1998 | A |
5778485 | Sano et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5783018 | Gore et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5814158 | Hollander et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5946184 | Kanno et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968282 | Yamasaka | Oct 1999 | A |
6019663 | Angell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6056627 | Mizuta | May 2000 | A |
6118290 | Sugiyama et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121058 | Shell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130104 | Yamasaka | Oct 2000 | A |
6170116 | Mizuta | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183677 | Usui et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193587 | Lin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6224470 | Hoey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256555 | Bacchi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280298 | Gonzales | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6306187 | Maeda et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322433 | Matsumura | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326413 | Blackwell et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355495 | Fujino et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366112 | Doherty et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6474350 | Mizuta | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507393 | Batchelder | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6523208 | Muscato et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6646455 | Maekawa et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6733876 | Beardsley et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741086 | Maekawa et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6776171 | Carptner | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777966 | Humphrey et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6813828 | Dlugokecki et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817052 | Grube | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821620 | Namikawa et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840374 | Khandros et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6884300 | Sato et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888344 | Maekawa et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6960123 | Mitarai | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7202683 | Humphrey et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7254861 | Morioka et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7306849 | Buckholtz et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7530887 | Jiang et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7621436 | Mii | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7655316 | Parkhe | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7779527 | Yudovsky et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7866530 | Riachentsev | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7975901 | Maeda et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8371316 | Humphrey et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8790466 | Broz et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801869 | Broz et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8876983 | Widhalm | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9093481 | Levinson | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9318362 | Leung et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9595456 | Humphrey et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9831215 | Chen et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9833818 | Humphrey et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10002776 | Humphrey et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10109504 | Humphrey et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10195648 | Broz et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10399809 | Montoya | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10741420 | Humphrey et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10766057 | Tokashiki et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10792713 | Humphrey et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10896828 | Humphrey et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
11035898 | Humphrey et al. | Jun 2021 | B1 |
20010007421 | Marcuse et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020028641 | Okubo et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020071115 | Batchelder | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079349 | Macover | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020096187 | Kuwata et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097060 | Maekawa et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102065 | Kiani | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030027496 | Back et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030076490 | Clark | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030092365 | Grube | May 2003 | A1 |
20030138644 | Khandros et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030180532 | Namikawa et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200989 | Humphrey et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040029316 | Schnegg et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040083568 | Morioka et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096643 | Sato et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040200515 | Saito et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050001645 | Humphrey et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050026552 | Fawcett et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050034743 | Kim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042958 | Namikawa et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050118414 | Namikawa | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050126590 | Sato et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050255796 | Haga | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050287789 | Tunaboylu | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008660 | Parkhe | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029441 | Atsushi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060065290 | Broz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076337 | Brunner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060151004 | Terada et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060219754 | Clauberg et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060272678 | Corrado et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289605 | Park et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070125491 | Yonemizu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140754 | Poxon et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153062 | Shie et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178814 | Sato et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205753 | Hau et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070284419 | Matlack et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023028 | Fujita | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080070481 | Tamura et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080207095 | Goto | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242576 | Tamura et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090197404 | Yang | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090212807 | Chen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227048 | Fang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248128 | Nassif et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100132736 | Lin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149785 | Dubuc et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100170533 | Terada et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210079 | Masuoka et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100258144 | Broz et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100294435 | Maeda et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110132396 | Humphrey | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120048298 | Humphrey et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120258144 | Humphrey et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266461 | Nickut et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120299175 | Tran | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130056025 | Widhalm | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130336689 | Swing | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336699 | Vo et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140191618 | Kijima et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140251535 | Ishii et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140338698 | Humphrey et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150187617 | Leung et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150191654 | Wang | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150214095 | Mischitz et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160131702 | Sinsheimer | May 2016 | A1 |
20170010306 | Na et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170203322 | Ivri et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180017748 | Mir Shafiei | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180071798 | Humphrey et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180125284 | Cave | May 2018 | A1 |
20180308821 | Humphrey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20200200800 | Stark et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200388590 | Jindo et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210005483 | Humphrey et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210146464 | Humphrey et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1643065 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1669677 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1717285 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1889240 | Jan 2007 | CN |
101252082 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101339898 | Jan 2009 | CN |
103831676 | Jun 2014 | CN |
202004009619 | Sep 2004 | DE |
102005052308 | May 2007 | DE |
1890326 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1942519 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2532255 | May 2021 | GB |
S5788742 | Jun 1982 | JP |
S58131743 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S6190434 | May 1986 | JP |
S6199336 | May 1986 | JP |
S61124139 | Jun 1986 | JP |
S61245536 | Oct 1986 | JP |
H01276720 | Nov 1989 | JP |
H0435778 | Feb 1992 | JP |
H05211195 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H0596057 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H05326471 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H07244074 | Sep 1995 | JP |
H08264627 | Oct 1996 | JP |
H09102453 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H09260326 | Oct 1997 | JP |
H10154686 | Jun 1998 | JP |
H11145212 | May 1999 | JP |
2000232125 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000332069 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2002248433 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004063669 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2005326250 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006013185 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006015457 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006019616 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006165395 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006186133 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006216886 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007002225 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007035684 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007157902 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007329377 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008047601 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008070280 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008066710 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008147551 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008270270 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009138027 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2011117938 | Jun 2011 | JP |
4840118 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2014107561 | Jun 2014 | JP |
6067951 | Jan 2017 | JP |
10-2003-92730 | Jul 2003 | KR |
20070074398 | Jul 2007 | KR |
20070074426 | Jul 2007 | KR |
10-2008-89297 | Mar 2009 | KR |
10-2011-063275 | Jun 2011 | KR |
20140066450 | Jun 2014 | KR |
20170127650 | Nov 2017 | KR |
20180108396 | Oct 2018 | KR |
409322 | Oct 2000 | TW |
9847663 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO0108819 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO2012032481 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Test Solutions, Probe Clean™ on Silicon Wafer Publication, dated May 2002 (2 pgs.). |
International Test Solutions Publication, Probe Clean™ for Use on Prober Abrasion Plates, dated May 2002 (2 pgs.). |
International Test Solutions Publication, Probe Clean™ Non-Abrasive Method to Clean Loose Debris from Probe Tips, dated May 2002 (1 pg.). |
International Test Solutions Publication, Probe Polish™ on Silicon Wafer, dated May 2002 (2 pgs.). |
International Test Solutions Publication, Probe Polish™ for Use on Prober Abrasion Plates, dated May 2002 (2 pgs.). |
International Test Solutions Publication, Probe Scrub™ Restore Probe Tip Performance and Remove Bonded Debris, dated May 2002 (1 pg.). |
International Test Solutions, Probe Form™ Publication, dated Jul. 7, 2005 (2 pgs.). |
International Test Solutions, Cleaning Parameters for TEL Probers P8 and P8-XL Publication, dated printout dated Sep. 18, 2003 http://web.archive.org/web/20030918014522/http://inttest.net/products/PC2002.pdf (3 pgs.). |
Anonymous: “Wire Bonding”—Wikipedia—Retrieved from the Internet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_bonding\ (2 pgs). |
Neware, Pallawi, B., et al., “Flexible Organic Light Emitting Diodes-FOLED,” Oct. 26, 2015, vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 3457-3462. |
Zhao, L., et al., “Novel Method for Fabricating Flexible Active Matrix Organiz Light Emitting Diode (AMOLED) Displays,” Sep. 21, 2011, (5 pp.). |
American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Test Methods of Liner Removal at High Speeds from Pressure-Sensitive Label Stock, Designation: D5375/D5375M—98, current edition approved Apr. 10, 1998, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 14.02., 3 pages. |
ASTM International, Standard Terminology of Adhesives, Designation: D907-15, current edition approved Sep. 15, 2015, 13 pages. |
ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Loop Track, Designation: D6195-03, current edition approved Apr. 1, 2011, 5 pages. |
ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Pressure-Sensitive Tack of Adhesives Using an Inverted Probe Machine, Designation: D2979-16, current edition approved Oct. 1, 2016, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210151317 A1 | May 2021 | US |