Patent Grant
8583527
This disclosure relates to communication systems and more particularly to communication systems used in incarceration situations for allowing calling users opportunities to use, and pay for, auxiliary services.
Current communication systems often have messaging options, such as voice-mail capability. However, a problem exists when the calling party receives a no-answer situation. In the normal (non-incarceration) situation the call would rollover to a voicemail application. When the user is an incarcerated person, or when the user is calling an incarcerated person, payment for the call is often an issue. While a calling party may be willing to pay to talk to a person in real time, that same person may not wish to pay to leave a message. In some situations, billing for calls to and from incarcerated persons is handled through a LEC billing system and in other situations the billing is pre-paid. In some situations the calling party, depending upon pre-established credit, is post billed for calls on a bulk (weekly, monthly) basis.
In developing the present invention it was discovered that, when the call is terminated at a messaging service, instead of being completed in real-time, different payment options may be desirable and thus completion of such calls are problematic when the calling (or called) party is to be charged for leaving a message or for having other services performed.
In addition, it would be desirable to allow communication systems, particularly electronic messaging systems, involving incarcerated facilities to have access to auxiliary services, such as message printing, binding, paper selection, hand delivery, etc. Payment difficulties, as well as monitoring of messages, time or frequency limits for messages and the like prevent such systems from being deployed presently.
The present invention is directed to systems and methods which determine the likelihood that a calling (or in some eases the called) user is able and/or will pay for a particular auxiliary service. The system considers the user's credit risk, his/her propensity to pay and/or other metrics indication of payment or collection risk, when deciding if the user is offered or is eligible for a particular auxiliary service. The methodology used for determining propensity to pay for an auxiliary service according to embodiments of the invention is independent from a determination of propensity to pay for a basic calling service. Thus, the criteria used, and the weight given to each criteria, for determining eligibility for auxiliary services can be different from the criteria and criteria weight used for basic communication connections.
In one embodiment, when a user encounters a busy or no-answer situation, the calling user is connected to an interactive voice response (IVR) system for beginning the voice messaging process. While the user is interacting with the IVR, the system in the background determines the user's credit risk, propensity for that user to pay for the message or other requested service, and/or other metrics of payment or collection risk. If collection risk is low enough, the propensity is high enough, and/or the other metrics analyzed are satisfactory meet a predetermined threshold), the user may be given the option to confirm his/her desire to pay and the method of payment. After the user and the system agree upon payment methods, the user may be given the opportunity to leave a message (or access other auxiliary services).
According to embodiments of the invention, a user for which the foregoing analysis with respect to offering message or other auxiliary services may be the called party. For example, the calling system may itself record a message from a calling party for delivery to a called party which did not answer the attempted call, wherein the called party is to pay for the message service. Thus, the system of embodiments may make a determination that the user qualifies for one or inure service (e.g., message delivery, “find-me, follow-me, call or message redirection, etc.) and thus allow a caller to leave a message or otherwise interact with an auxiliary services platform. When the called party is placed in contact with the system (e.g., by outbound messaging and/or when the user is next in communication using the system) the user may agree to pay and/or the payment method used to deliver or complete the auxiliary service (e.g., deliver a recorded message).
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
The present disclosure relates to communications, and more particularly, to systems and methods for independently authorizing auxiliary communication services, such as for example, voice-messages, printed electronic mail and the like. It is understood, however, that the following disclosure provides many different embodiments, or examples, for implementing different features of the invention. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the present disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. In addition, the present disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed.
Turning now to
It should be noted that in additional embodiments of the present invention, iCBS 10 may also incorporate intelligent high value customer service (iHVC) 103 for providing a variable and selective customer service options in which the selection of the level of service offered to a customer is made responsive to the customer score.
While the inventive elements of iCBS 10 are intended to be applicable to a wide variety of business models and business situations, the detailed description presented below of one embodiment of iCBS 10 will be specifically tailored to the example of a prison telecommunications service provider. Considering the specific example, as prisoners attempt to make out-going calls from the prison, or when a non-incarcerated user attempts to call an incarcerated user, the called phone number is received at iCBS 10 and processed by iCSS 100 for calculation of the customer score. The called, and, if necessary, the calling, number may be obtained in many different known ways, such as via dual tone, multiple frequency (DTMF) readers, via an Internet protocol (IP) network, via the signaling system 7 (SS7) network, or via dialed number identification service (DNIS) signals provided by the network.
If a particular called (or when appropriate, calling) number is not already in the service provider's customer database, the customer score that is preferably calculated by iCSS 100 will be an initial score based on the immediately available local information associated with the requested call and the called number. The telecommunication service provider compares the initial customer score against a preset risk threshold to determine which calls will be allowed and which calls will be blocked. If a call is blocked, a message may preferably be played to the inmate informing him or her of the reason why the call was blocked, or switching the inmate to an operator or interactive voice response (IVR) unit to make arrangements for the requested or future calls. An outgoing call may also preferably be placed by the IVR system to the blocked called party. The outgoing call preferably informs the called party that an inmate was attempting to reach the called party but was blocked, and offers the called party alternative products for arranging future calls from the inmate. The called party may also preferably be asked for additional or supplemental detailed information that may be used for refining the customer score. For example, the called party may be asked for their social security number, the length of time at their home/job, whether they rent or own, and the like. All of this information is preferably stored in BCD 104 for future use. For security purposes, the outgoing call may also preferably offer the called party an option to permanently block the called party's number from being called. Such circumstances may be necessary to thwart harassment of victims by the inmates.
In some situations, the calling connection, when not answered by a “live” person is sent to an auxiliary communication service, such as for example, a voice messaging system, whether a voice messaging system provided outside of the call control system e.g., called party voice mail system) or a voice messaging system provided in association with the call control system (e.g., the message delivery system shown and described in the above referenced application entitled “System and Method for Called Party Controlled Message Delivery”. In such a situation, since the parameters for determining “willingness” and/or propensity to pay for such an auxiliary service may be different from the willingness and/or propensity to pay for a live call, a new calculation is made according to embodiments to determine whether the call should proceed with an auxiliary communication service and if so what the billing and/or collection parameters will be. This new calculation is preferably made using the procedures outlined above however, one more of the criteria parameters used to determine willingness to pay may be changed.
In the prior art systems, the calls that required messaging services, were blocked because there was no assurance that the calling (or in some cases the called) party would be willing and/or able to pay for such services. However, in the described embodiment of the present invention, iROM 101 may preferably determine that it is indeed feasible to provide one or more services desired by the calling and/or called user, perhaps by changing the method of payment and/or the collection mechanism. ICBS 10 preferably communicates the called (or in some cases, the calling) numbers of calls requiring auxiliary services to iROM 101 for rating (or rerating) the related customer scores. An opportunity risk matrix (ORM) is established by the service provider identifying various service or billing plans aimed at optimizing profit opportunities for some of the blocked calls. The different risk levels found within the ORM may be lower than the threshold risk level associated with the real-time call authorization procedure. However, the varying levels are selected to correspond to the various customer scores (e.g., a higher risk customer score may be paired with a low-risk billing and collection method, while a low risk customer score may be associated with a higher risk billing and collection plan). As iROM 101 processes the customer score in comparison to the ORM levels through a software or hardware product or application comparator, a subset of possible revenue opportunity applications is identified as potentially available to the customers according to their respective customer scores. These possible call completion opportunities may either be presented to the customer for selection, or may be selected and implemented by the service provider directly.
In making this determination of possible revenue opportunity applications and products, parameters such as customer score or risk metric, the general length of the inmate's incarceration (which may preferably be obtained through deduction based on the prison unit from which the call originates, which, itself, may be deduced from the area code and prefix of the calling number, typically obtained from the automatic number identification (ANI) service), the potential profit margin available for the type of calls predicted (e.g., long distance vs. local or comparing average call costs vs. recovery margins for different geographic regions or comparing the available billable rates), the payment history of a particular customer or owner of the destination number, contractual obligations, commission agreements, governmental regulations, the type of transaction requested, costs for external validation, billing and collection (B&C) costs, rate revenue per call, the cost of the different billing products versus their economic benefits, and the like are considered. By weighing those and other parameters in the iT brain or system processor, iROM 101 preferably selects a variety of different payment products, which may include products such as standard post-paid products or prepaid products. They may also preferably determine a billing cycle, such as every 30 days, every two weeks, or even every few days depending on the customer score. They may also preferably determine the appropriate payment cycle, such as 30 days, two weeks, or a couple of days from receiving the bill. IROM 101 also preferably determines whether a direct billing product is necessary and/or desirable, or whether LEC billing product is acceptable. For LEC unbillable calls 106, a direct billing system would be desirable as the prison telecommunication service provider is not capable of billing that particular LEC without a billing arrangement.
As part of the general management functions performed by the inventive system, the transaction authorizations may take the form of a credit-type authorization, in which the customer would be limited to a certain monetary value of credit, or an entitlement-type authorization, in which the customer would be limited to a numerical, per-use entitlement. In administering either type of usage authorization system, the present invention intelligently sets the usage limit based on individual customer segmentation using the customer score and the additional information considered by iCBS 10 to manage the risk of the transaction.
Turning now to
Assuming, for purposes of this example, that phone number/transaction request 20 is the first transaction request for this particular called number, iT brain 200 preferably makes a real-time determination to authorize or block the requested call. To make the real-time authorization, iT brain 200 preferably accesses internal database 201 to find generic demographic information related to phone number/transaction request 20. By using generic and widely available demographic information, as correlated to phone number/transaction request 20, iT brain 200 preferably calculates the initial customer score for purposes of authorizing or blocking the initial collect call request. In additional embodiments, iT brain 200 may also initially access the local information which may provide accurate BNA information, the general length of the inmate's incarceration, the potential profit margin available for the type of calls requested, the payment history of a particular customer or owner of the destination number, contractual obligations, commission agreements, governmental regulations, the type of transaction requested, costs for external validation, B&C costs, rate revenue per call, rate of consumption, and the like. IT brain 200 may preferably cross-reference census data that has been associated with area codes and telephone number prefixes, by using the Bellcore/Telecordia area code system, the NPA/Nxx numbering system. The related census data may preferably be stored locally and used by iT brain 200 to find generalized income levels of persons residing in that geographic area, average home values of persons residing in that area, and, therefore, facilitate calculating an intelligent real-time customer score based solely on the use of the NPA/Nxx data.
After making its real-time determination based on the information gathered from internal database 201, iT brain 200 preferably assigns customer score 202 to phone number/transaction request 20. Customer score 202 will typically reside within preset risk range 204. Depending on the system used by prison telecommunication provider, a high score may correlate to a low risk, high profitability transaction request, whereas a low score would represent a high risk, low profitability transaction request. It should be noted that other scoring systems with different representations of risk levels may also be used in preset risk range 204. Customer score 202 is then compared by iT brain 200 with risk threshold 203. Risk threshold 203 may also preferably be pre-selected by the prison telecommunication service provider on a sliding scale represented by threshold range 205. If the risk level associated with customer score 202 represents a better risk than risk threshold 203, iCSS 100 allows phone number/transaction requests 20 to be completed. However, if customer score 202 represents a higher risk value than risk threshold 203, phone number/transaction request 20 is denied or blocked.
After iT brain 200 makes the determination of whether to block or connect phone number/transaction request 20, it begins to refine customer score 202 by accessing external databases 21-1 through 21-N. The process of accessing external databases 21-1 through 21-N is sometimes referred to as data mining. IT brain 200 mines for data associated with phone number/transaction request 20 that would indicate a tendency for a low or high customer score. Such information may include payment histories for certain on-line vendors, in-service dates for the destination phone number, the type of dwelling that is serviced by the destination telephone number (i.e., whether the dwelling is a home or an apartment), accurate BNA information, and the like. IT brain 200 will preferably mine data in external databases 21-1 through 21-N and possibly find correlation elements 22 to correlate the data mined with the destination of phone number preferably within a period of time after the initial collect call being made.
After completion of the data mining process and evaluating all of correlation elements 22, iT brain 200 preferably recalculates a predictive risk management value and refines customer score 202 to phone number/transaction request 20. As opposed to the real-time determination represented by initial customer score 202, refined customer score 202 preferably represents a more accurate investigation and prediction into the customer score or predictive risk of the called party at phone number/transaction request 20. The eventual level of customer score 202 may preferably indicate to iCSS 100 that future calls should either be blocked or be turned over to iROM 101 for determination of a revenue opportunity product to be offered to the called party
When a revenue opportunity product may be desirable, iCSS 100 preferably communicates customer score 202 to iROM 101 for determining appropriate revenue or profit opportunity products or applications to offer or select for the called party. IROM 101 examines customer score 202 and compares it to the ORM to select various payment and billing products according to cycle list 207 and product list 208. The service provider would either present the list of possible products to the customer for selection, or select the most desirable product automatically. For example, if phone number/transaction request 20 is serviced by a LEC which does not have a billing arrangement with the prison telecommunication service provider, yet its customer score 202 represents an extremely low risk and high profitability margin, iROM 101 may select to offer standard payment products, which include post-paid products billed directly by the service provider on a monthly payment cycle. These high-valued customers may also preferably warrant additional grace periods in which to make payments after the 30-day cycle. In contrast, if customer score 202 represents a higher risk value than risk threshold 203, but still offers a reasonable predictive risk of recovering revenue, iROM 101 may select to offer different prepaid calling packages to the called party at phone number/transaction request 20, including various denominations and accounts to pay for future or pending collect calls. Additional, if customer score 202 represents a high predictive risk, but still an acceptable level, instead of a prepaid product, a standard post-paid bill product may be offered. However, instead of providing for a 30 day billing cycle as with the lower risk customers, iROM 101 may select more frequent billing cycles, such as billing every three days, with a payment return time of three days. In this manner, the higher risk individuals will be billed more quickly and, if their payments are not received in the time allotted, their accounts may be blocked before further costs are expended completing calls that may not be paid for.
In conjunction with the revenue opportunity products offered by iROM 101, iDBS 102 adds direct billing methods to supplement the revenue opportunity products. For example, if phone number/transaction request 20 has a very low risk level in customer score 202, but, the destination number is served by a LEC which does not have a billing agreement with the prison telecommunication provider, iCBS, as depicted in
Additional embodiments of the present invention may also include iHVC 103 to provide customer services. Even though the specifically described example addresses issues involved in serving prisons, a considerable amount of revenue is still available in providing such telecommunication services to the prison and the prisoners' family communities. Thus, as in any other service oriented business, customer service and customer satisfaction is important in maintaining revenue and also increasing the recovery of revenue and ultimate firm profitability. With these goals in mind, iCBS 10, as depicted in
While the initial customer score is a value calculated in real-time to make a real-time determination to authorize or deny a requested transaction, the refined customer score is a more detailed prediction of risk or dependability level as performed over a longer amount of time and is also a more detailed review of information associated with the phone number. When an initial transaction request has been made, as the iCSS makes its real-time customer assessment, it also begins the process of predicting and determining the refined customer score for subsequent transaction requests. If the phone number is found in the local database in step 303, the database is checked for the existing refined customer score in step 310. The profitability of the transaction is determined in step 305, whereafter a determination is made in step 306 whether the requested transaction is expected to be profitable, based at least in part on the profitability information and the refined customer score. If it is expected to be profitable, the transaction is authorized in step 309. If not, the transaction is denied in step 307 and the information is transferred to the iROM in step 308.
If an initial customer score was calculated as a result of step 304, the system preferably accesses external databases in step 313, checks any customer payment experience in step 314, and gathers additional customer-specific information in step 312, after interacting with the customer in step 311. For example, during any outbound calls placed by the system's IVR units to the called party, the IVR applications prompt the called party for additional, useful identification and validation information. Alternatively, the information may be retrieved when the called party calls the service provide either with live, voice-to-voice or chat capabilities. Using this additional information, the initial customer score is preferably refined into the refined customer score in step 315. Refinement is a continuous process as new information is obtained. Thereafter, the refined customer score is stored in the local database for future use in step 316. As shown in
The iROM determines whether a direct billing product would be available or beneficial to the customer in step 403 based on its cost and economic benefits. If no direct billing product is suggested, then, in step 404, the iROM will pass the billing structure over to a standard third-party-billing-authority option, such as the LEC billing in the prison service provider example. If, on the other hand, it is determined that an appropriate direct billing product may be available from the iDBS, the iROM will identify and/or select a particular product or a set of possible products for a customer in step 405. In step 406, a determination is made whether the selected product or products are pre-paid products or post-paid products. If one or more of the selected products is a pre-paid product, the product is grouped for presentation to the customer in steps 407 and 408. If, however, the selected product includes a post-paid product, the iDBS, responsive to the customer score comparison, will select the appropriate variable billing cycle and/or variable payment cycle for the customer in step 408. The identified post-paid products may also be assembled with any of the identified prepaid products for presentation to the customer in steps 407 and 408. However, the in the described embodiment, the system will preferably automatically select the specific direct billing product that is most beneficial for profit optimization. In step 407, the system places an outbound call to the customer at the telephone number. During the call, the different identified prepaid and/or post-paid products are presented to the customer to select for facilitating future transactions in step 409. Additionally, in step 410, the system retrieves additional validation and/or identification data from the customer to supplement the information contained in the internal/local database. Upon receiving the product selection from the customer, the system will implement the selected product in step 411.
If a post-paid product is selected, the system sends the bill directly to the customer in step 412. Once the bill has been sent to the customer, the system preferably begins to monitor the bill status of the outstanding pending bill in step 413. As a part of the monitoring process, in step 414, the system determines whether the customer has fully paid the bill within the time allotted. If the customer has not fully paid the bill within the allotted time, the system preferably blocks or denies any future or pending requests of the customer in step 415. The iDBS preferably sends the customer a past due or delinquent notice in step 416. Depending on the number of past due or delinquent notices, as determined by step 417, the customer's account may either be submitted to a bill collection service in step 418, or passed back to the decision block of step 414 to determine whether the customer has paid the bill. As soon as the customer is detected to have paid the bill, the status on the customer's account is preferably changed to a “paid” status in step 419.
To maintain an accurate predictive risk management level or customer score, the iT brain may dynamically adjust the profitability or customer score associated with the customer. In step 420, in addition to gathering the additional information from both the internal and external databases, it is determined whether the specific payment history of the customer merits any change in the customer's related customer score. If no change is indicated, no action is taken in step 421. However, if an adjustment is merited according to the payment history, the system preferably recalculates or adjusts (i.e., refines) the customer score according to the customer's specific payment history in step 422. For example, if the customer has numerous delinquent notices, and/or numerous late payment notices, the system may preferably adjust the customer score to reflect a higher predictive risk associated with that customer. Conversely, if the customer has exhibited a good bill payment history over a period of time, the system may preferably adjust the customer score to reflect a lower predictive risk value for that customer. Thus, as the iT brain learns more about the payment characteristics of the customer, the customer's customer score or profitability level will preferably be adjusted accordingly to accurately reflect the level of profitability or predictive risk for the customer.
It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the described embodiment tailored for prison telecommunication service providers. Alternative embodiments of the present invention may be applied to other businesses as well. For example, remaining in the telecommunications industry, the collect call (i.e., 0+, 1-800-COLLECT, 1-800-CALL-ATT, etc.), 10-10-XXX long distance services, and the like may also implement the present invention to improve its capability for optimizing profitability. Outside of the telecommunication industry, credit and billing systems may be based on the present invention keying credit authorization and risk-dependent transactions on telephone numbers with variable billing and service procedures selectively tailored for the individual customer segment. Any system in which a telephone number may be used to designate the ultimately responsible party may implement various embodiments of the present invention.
Additionally, outside of the credit authorization sectors, call centers may be able to implement various embodiments of the present invention for selectively offering customer service to various callers based on the customer score for potential profitability. For instance, if a caller calls into a business call center, the customer score analysis may be performed to determine that the caller is likely a profitable potential customer. As a result of this customer score, the call center may direct the caller to a more personal calling experience to enhance the callers interaction with the call center.
When implemented in software, the elements of the present invention are essentially the code segments to perform the necessary tasks. The program or code segments can be stored in a processor readable medium or transmitted by a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave, or a signal modulated by a carrier, over a transmission medium. The “processor readable medium” may include any medium that can store or transfer information. Examples of the processor readable medium include an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, a ROM, a flash memory, an erasable ROM (EROM), a floppy diskette, a compact disk CD-ROM, an optical disk, a hard disk, a fiber optic medium, a radio frequency (RF) link, etc. The computer data signal may include any signal that can propagate over a transmission medium such as electronic network channels, optical fibers, air, electromagnetic, RF links, etc. The code segments may be downloaded via computer networks such as the Internet, Intranet, etc.
When the system detects a call incoming from a party, process 602 of the illustrated embodiment prompts for a billing telephone number (BTN), although embodiments may determine BTN or other information through other means (e.g., automatic number identification (ANI)). Process 603 determines if the detected BTN has already established a voice mail account. If it has not, then process 604 determines if the BTN is a prepaid collect account.
If it is a prepaid collect account, then process 618 determines if the prepaid account has sufficient funds. If so, process 623 records a message for the called party, which is in this case a detainee. If there are not sufficient funds in the account then process 619 prompts for either collecting more funds or terminating the session via process 620.
Returning now to process 603, if the billing telephone number has a voicemail account then process 611 determines if there is a voicemail mailbox identification associated therewith. If not, then process 617 determines if this party is a prepaid call account user. If it is, process 618 is involved according to the illustrated embodiment with respect to the call. If process 611 determines that there is a mailbox associated with the user (e.g., by referencing the BTN, account number, mailbox ID, user input, etc.), then process 612 determines what that mailbox ID is, process 613 validates the mailbox ID and process 616 determines if the BTN and mailbox combination are valid. If not, then process 614 of the illustrated embodiment prompts for the caller to reenter the information. If the ID continues to be invalid for a number of times, for example twice, then process 615 terminates the session. However, if the user information and mailbox combination are valid then process 617 determines if the calling party is a prepaid collect account and if it is then process 618, as discussed above, determines if there are enough funds in the account to allow a message to be recorded. On the other hand, if process 617 determines that it is not a prepaid account then process 621, as discussed above, determines the likelihood of payment and the payment method.
Process 622 of the illustrated embodiment determines if this is going to be an LEC/direct billed decile proved voicemail and if so, then process 605, working in conjunction with process 621 if necessary, determines the decile. Process 606 then determines if this BIN is eligible for a payment and collection plan using the foregoing decile and, if not, the user is sent to an announcement via processes 607 and 608 to setup prepaid collect accounts. If the BTN is eligible for a plan then process 609 is called upon to determine whether the caller wants to insure privacy for the called party or whether anybody can listen to the message. If privacy is required, process 610 sets up a mailbox with privacy features. If not, then process 623 records the message, as discussed above, for general delivery (e.g., anyone using a particular phone or other user terminal may be able to retrieve the message, such as by the user dialing the BTN associated with the message).
Returning now to process 702, if there is a voicemail associated with a BTN then process 710 sends an announcement that there is a message and process 711 of the illustrated embodiment determines if the detainee wants to retrieve the message. If the detainee desires to retrieve the message, process 712 determines if there is a mailbox ID associated with the message. If there is, then process 713 of the illustrated embodiment obtains the mailbox ID from the detainee and process 704 determines if it is valid. Alternative embodiments may make a mailbox determination through different means, such as by referencing calling and/or called party information (e.g., inmate personal identification information (PIN)). Process 715 prompts to reenter invalid numbers, such as one or two or three times, and terminates the call if in fact there is no proper match. If there is a proper match, then process 715 determines if this is a prepaid collect account. If it is, then process 716 determines if there are sufficient funds in the account. It should be appreciated that although the embodiment of flow chart 600 in
If there are insufficient funds, in the account, process 723 announces to the detainee that there needs to be more funds available and the call is terminated or the detainee is presented with an opportunity to pay for the message through other means (e.g. the detainees prepaid account, such as a commissary account). However, if process 716 determines that there are sufficient funds, then process 717 debits the prepaid account and the detainee retrieves the message via process 718. If the detainee does not want to retrieve the message, then process 719 terminates the call or presents the detainee with other options. If the detainee wants to leave another message (e.g., a reply or return message), process 720 supervises such a situation. If the detainee is not authorized to leave a message, process 733 provides such an announcement. If the detainee is authorized to leave a message, process 721 records the message and process 722 optionally notifies an external party of the message. It should be appreciated that processes similar to these described above with respect to flow diagram 600 of
Returning now to process 715, if the BTN is not a prepaid collect amount then process 730, in the manner discussed above, checks for the likelihood of payment and the method of payment. Process 731 then controls the leaving or not leaving of a message in conjunction with process 732.
If there is an account, then a determination is made as to whether the BTN desires to receive messages from this detainee. If yes, then process 810 determines if this is a direct billed account. If it is, then the detainee leaves a message via process 819 and notification is sent to the BIN via process 818. However, if this is not a direct billed situation, then process 811 prepares to deal with the prepaid collect account. Process 813 determines if the detainee is authorized to send the message and if so, process 814 determines if the account has sufficient funds. If not, process 815 supervises the announcement of insufficient funds and either terminates the call or in some cases arranges with the user to provide more funds into the system. Process 816 allows the detainee to leave a message with process 817 deducting the proper amount from the BIN account. Process 818, as discussed, sends notification to the BIN that a message is available.
Returning to process 920, if the decile analysis is determined to be acceptable then processes 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932 and 933 control the establishment of accounts for the retrieving of the message and eventually play the message via process 934.
Note that in all cases where the detainee or the non-custodial person leaves a message the message could be any other service such as, for example, an email or direction to print a document, etc., all of which would have different charges associated therewith and therefore different algorithms determining their respective payment, if desired.
Bus 1102 is also coupled to input/output (I/O) controller card 1105, communications adapter card 11.11, user interface card 1108, and display card 1109. The I/O adapter card 1105 connects to storage devices 1106, such as one or more of a hard drive, a CD drive, a floppy disk drive, a tape drive, to the computer system. The I/O adapter 1105 is also connected to printer 1111, which would allow the system to print paper copies of information such as document, photographs, articles, etc. Note that the printer may a printer (e.g. dot matrix, laser, etc.), a fax machine, or a copier machine. Communications card 1111 is adapted to couple the computer system 1100 to a network 1112, which may be one or more of a telephone network, a local (LAN) and/or a wide-area (WAN) network, an Ethernet network, and/or the Internet network. User interface card 1108 couples user input devices, such as keyboard 1113, pointing device 1107, and microphone 1116, to the computer system 1100. User interface card 1108 also provides sound output to a user via speaker(s) 1115. The display card 1109 is driven by CPU 1101 to control the display on display device 1110.
When operating any one or number of embodiments of the present invention as shown in
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/750,075, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INDEPENDENTLY AUTHORIZING AUXILIARY COMMUNICATION SERVICES,” filed May 17, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/135,883, entitled “OPTIMIZING PROFITABILITY IN BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS,” filed Apr. 29, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. Also incorporated by reference herein are U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/190,315, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OFFERING A SERVICE TO A PARTY ASSOCIATED WITH A BLOCKED CALL”; filed Jul. 2, 2002, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/640,505, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CALLED PARTY CONTROLLED MESSAGE DELIVERY,” filed Aug. 13, 2003, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/947,986, entitled “OPTIMIZING PROFITABILITY IN BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS” filed Sep. 23, 2004, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/562,829, entitled “OPTIMIZING PROFITABILITY IN BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS” filed Nov. 22, 2006.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4797910 | Daudelin | Jan 1989 | A |
| 5185781 | Dowden et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5210789 | Jeffus et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5517555 | Amadon et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5594789 | Seazholtz et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5615408 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5627887 | Freedman | May 1997 | A |
| 5655013 | Gainsboro | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5832068 | Smith | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5937044 | Kim | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5963625 | Kawecki et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6078892 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6282276 | Fleger | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6330546 | Gopinathan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6353663 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6377938 | Block et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6397055 | McHenry et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405028 | DePaola et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6430274 | Winstead et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434378 | Fougnies | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6483910 | Council | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6516056 | Justice et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6636591 | Swope et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6639977 | Swope et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6639978 | Draizin et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6658393 | Basch et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6947532 | Marchand et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 7469155 | Chu | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7561680 | Falcone et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7698182 | Falcone et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7899167 | Rae | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 20010011228 | Shenkman | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010028705 | Adams et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020025028 | Manto | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020106065 | Joyce et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115424 | Bagoren et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136374 | Fleischer, III et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138417 | Lawrence | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147002 | Trop et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184103 | Shah et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194096 | Falcone et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194113 | Lof et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030002639 | Huie | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030008634 | Laybourn et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046208 | Lubking et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064380 | Rao et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076940 | Manto | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030086546 | Falcone et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138084 | Lynam et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162526 | Ogman et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200182 | Truitt et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040078328 | Talbert et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20060064380 | Zukerman | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Inmate Phone Systems on the Line, Donna Rogers, May 2001. |
| Top Features of Inmate Telecom Systems Donna Rogers. Corrections Forum. Hicksville: May/Jun. 2004. vol. 13, Iss. 3; p. 34. |
| EPO, “International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” for PCT/US08/63924, dated Jul. 18, 2008, (9 pages). |
| Rogers, Donna, “Top Features of Inmate Telecom Systems,” Corrections Forum, vol. 13, Issue 3, May/Jun. 2004, p. 34, (7 pages). |
| Viola et al, “Information Management and Movement System and Method,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/135,878, filed Apr. 29, 2002, abandoned. |
| Groenfeldt, Tom, “Trimming the telecom tab,” CFO: The Magazine for Senior Financial Executives, Oct. 1995, pp: 97-99, v11, n10. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120296807 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11750075 | May 2007 | US |
| Child | 13566867 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10135883 | Apr 2002 | US |
| Child | 11750075 | US |
