1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to systems and methods for measuring power in a circuit. More particularly, this invention relates to on-board systems and methods for measure power of a circuit or sub-circuit on a Printed Circuit Board.
2. Description of the Related Art
Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) are well known. PCBs are a convenient and effective way to manufacture and implement both analog and digital electronics, often referred to as integrated circuits. Today, integrated circuits on PCBs are used in a multitude of applications, such as in computers, networking equipment, electronic appliances, stereos, etc.
In general, a PCB is manufactured to design specifications and lays out the electronic circuits for the associated application, such as the wiring for an integrated circuit. Then, after the PCB has been manufactured, the elements and various components of the integrated circuit are mounted onto the PCB at touch points, such as by soldering, etc.
As integrated circuits have become more and more complex, their related power consumption and distribution becomes more demanding. Accordingly, accurate testing of an integrated circuit's power needs is essential to the production of quality integrated circuits, and in turn, electrical and electronic equipment.
Often, analytical tools such as component modeling tools or simulation tools (e.g., SPICE®, etc.) are used by design engineers to help predict power consumption and distribution across an integrated circuit. However, many factors make the accurate prediction of the characteristics of an integrated circuit unreliable. For example, it is common for a PCB to be manufactured to tolerances of up to ±10%. Similarly, component tolerances may vary. Thus, the modeling of an integrated circuit may be used for design purposes, but might not accurately predict the actual power consumption and power distribution characteristics of an integrated circuit on a PCB, which could change with the varying tolerances. Accordingly, electronics manufacturers still must rely on conventional, laboratory type testing of integrated circuits manufactured on PCBs.
The physical testing of a integrated circuit on a PCB is not without its problems. For example, it is a common practice to test an integrated circuit by “breaking up” or isolating sections of a circuit or sub-circuit on the PCB. In order to isolate a circuit or sub-circuit, a component (e.g., an inductor, etc.) is usually removed and a power source is then spliced in, such as by a wire. Then, various voltage and current measurements may be made using conventional meters (e.g., voltage and current meters, oscilloscopes, etc.). However, as electronic components become smaller, physically isolating circuits on a PCB and accurately attaching scopes and meters to the circuit becomes more cumbersome, and is often impossible.
Ideally, to perform such testing, a precision measurement of the current feeding a circuit is necessary, which can be achieved by providing a precision current source in series with the circuit, or by adding a precision resistor in series with a voltage source to a circuit. For example, referring to prior art
Adding components in series with the circuit itself could affect the inductances of the circuit and accordingly, affect overall performance. Moreover, precision resistors also have the problem that they often cannot handle high current.
In view of the aforementioned problems, there is a need for new and improved systems and methods for measured the power of a circuit on a PCB that is accurate and nonintrusive. Such systems and methods should limit the number of additional components added to the circuit being tested, and should allow testers better access to circuits or less cumbersome methods to make measurements.
The present invention provides a system for measuring core power of a circuit on a printed circuit board (PCB) including first and second circuits, a power plane, a power strip, and a calibration strip. The power plane is for feeding the first circuit. The power strip is for providing power to the power plane disposed in the PCB, is connected to the power plane and has at least two vias for measuring a voltage drop. The calibration strip has a predetermined width and is disposed in the PCB. The calibration strip also has at least two vias for measuring a voltage drop. The second circuit is configured to measure a first voltage drop across at least two vias of the power strip as a first voltage and a second voltage drop across at least two vias of the calibration strip as a second voltage, and to perform a power calculation by calculating a power being fed to the first circuit based on the first voltage and the second voltage.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, provided is a system for measuring power within a circuit on a printed circuit board (PCB) including a first power supply, a first circuit, a power plane feeding the first circuit, a power strip, and a second circuit. The power strip is embedded in the PCB and connects the first power supply to the power plane. The power strip has at least two vias for measuring a voltage drop. The second circuit is configured to measure a voltage drop across the power strip as a first voltage, the temperature of the power strip, and calculate the power consumed by the first circuit based on the first voltage and the temperature.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, provided is a method for determining the core power of a circuit on printed circuit board (PCB) having a circuit being fed power from a power source via a power plane, The method includes the step of embedding a power strip having a predetermined length and width into the PCB during the manufacturing of the PCB. Next, a second power supply is connected to the power strip, which is grounded to allow a current flow through the power strip. Next, a voltage drop across the power strip is measured as a first voltage. Next, a voltage drop across the power plane is measured as a second voltage. Finally, the power to the circuit is calculated based on the first and second voltages, the predetermined length and the predetermined width.
For full understanding of the present invention, reference should be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a is a schematic block diagram of an on-board system for measure power of a circuit on a PCB according to a first embodiment of this invention;
b is a schematic block diagram of an alternative power configuration for an on-board system for measure power of a circuit on a PCB;
Referring to
The power strip 206 has vias a and b, voltage drop points, placed a predetermined distance apart. The voltage drop V1 across the vias a and b are input into a differencing circuit 214 which measure the voltage drop V1 and outputs a voltage signal equal to the voltage drop V1 to a power determination circuit 216. A temperature meter 220 measures the temperature of the power strip 206 and outputs a temperature signal tmp to the power determination circuit 216. The power determination circuit 216 calculates the core power P of the circuit 208 and outputs a power signal P. As will be explained in detail below, various calculations may be made to determine the power based on a number of factors which could include voltage drop V1, the size of power strip 206, the material of each, the temperature tmp of the power strip 206, and the load of circuit 208. The power signal P can be output from power determination circuit 216 to a display circuit, calibrating circuit, or other circuit as desired.
The calculation of power is shown in more detail with reference to
In this embodiment of the present invention, the resistance R of the power strip 206 is calculated by taking into account the temperature (tmp) of the power strip 206, thermal coefficient (e), resistivity (p), the thickness T, and the known length L and width W. Accordingly, the following formulas may be used to calculate power:
R=(1+(tmp−20)*e)*L*p/W*T
P=VDC1*V1/R
Accordingly, the power determination circuit 216 may have the known values L, W, T, p and e stored in memory or input dynamically from an external source.
Since the thickness of the power strip 206 may be unknown or may vary depending on the manufacturing tolerances of the process used to manufacture the PCB, an on board self calibrating circuit can be added to system 200 to eliminate the need for accurate measurement of the thickness.
Referring to
The power strip 206 and the calibration strip 212 each have vias a–d, voltage drop points, placed at a predetermined distance apart. The voltage drops V1 and V2 across the vias are input into difference circuits 214 which measure the voltage drop across each via. As an example, two differencing circuits are shown. The voltage drops measured, V1 and V2, are entered into a power determination circuit 216 which can calculate the core power of the circuit 208. As will be explained in detail below, various calculations may be made to determine the power based on a number of factors which could include V1 and V2, the size of calibration strip 212, power strip 206, the material of each, the temperature of the calibration strip 212 and the power strip 206, and the load of circuit 208. The power can be output as a signal P from power determination circuit 216 to a display circuit, calibrating circuit, or other circuit as desired.
As shown and described with reference to
Resistance can be determined in terms of the resistance of power strip 206 (R1) and calibration strip 212 (R2) as follows:
R1=(1+(tmp−20)*e)*L1*p/W1*T
R2=(1+(tmp−20)*e)*L2*p/W2*T
p=R2*W2*T/(1+(tmp−20)*e)*L2, therefore
R1=L1*R2*W2/W1*L2
The resistance of the calibration strip 212 R2 may be determined by accurate measurement of the current through the strip, such as by adding a precision resistor in series with calibration strip 212 or by providing a precision current source (not shown). Thus, the power of the circuit 208 may be determined without intrusive meters or without adding additional components to the voltage path of the circuit 208.
Referring to
This embodiment is similar to the second embodiment, but differs in that the power determination circuit 216 is replaced by an analog to digital (A/D) converter 218 and a CPU. Since the voltage drops V1 and V2 can be very small, a means for amplifying the voltage drops V2 and V2 may used. As an example, differencing circuits 214 may be operational amplifier circuits which feed an amplified voltage drops V1 and V2 to the A/D converters 218, which can accurately convert the amplified voltages V1 and V2 into digital signals V1′ and V2′, which are fed to the CPU 220. The CPU 220 can then calculate power P using the calculations already described above.
Although a CPU 220 is shown, the present invention is not meant to be limited to embodiments including a CPU. For example, one having ordinary skill in the art will understand that power calculations described herein may be performed using a variety of calculating means and methods, such as with digital and analog circuits.
b illustrates an alternate power configuration for the calibration strip 212, in the present embodiment. In particular, rather than providing a precision resistor in series with the current supply, the calibration strip 212 is placed directly in parallel with a voltage source 210, and the voltage drop V2 is measured by the differencing circuit 214 from vias c and d, in the same manner as described above. The output of the differencing circuit may be connected to A/D converter 218 as shown in
Referring to
The output 304 (e.g., V1 or V2) of operational amplifier 302 may be input into an A/D converter as shown in
Referring now to
The calibration strip 212 is placed in series with an input voltage source 210 and a precision resistor Rp, which is also shown in the expanded view of
Referring to
Next at step 8-3, the voltage drop across the power strip is measured, such as by a circuit connected to the strip at the vias. Such a circuit has already been described above with reference to
At step 8-4, once the voltage drop has been measured, the power can be calculated based on the length, width, thickness, voltage across the vias, temperature of the board, resistivity of the strip, and temperature coefficient of the strip. Such a circuit has already been described above and could include a differencing circuit, operational amplifiers, A/D converters, a power calculation circuit, and a CPU. Processing terminates at step 8-5.
Referring to
Next at step 9-3, a separate calibration strip is disposed in close proximity (e.g., adjacent) to the power strip. Similar to the previous step, the calibration strip can be preferably disposed during the manufacturing of the PCB. This calibration strip is given a power source having a known current, and can be the calibration strip already defined above with reference to
Thus, having fully described the invention by way of example with reference to the attached drawing figures, it will readily be appreciated that many changes and modifications may be made to the invention and to the embodiments disclosed without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, the power strip and the calibration strip can be of any known conductor, semiconductor, or other suitable material. Also, if the temperature of the entire PCB at power is constant, then only one calibration strip is needed for all circuits across the entire board (however, at least one power strip per circuit is still needed).
This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 09/892,850 filed Jun. 28, 2001 which claims priority from Provisional Application No. 60/243,267 entitled, “BOARD LEVEL POWER MONITOR” filed Oct. 26, 2000, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
720335 | Eastman | Feb 1903 | A |
1446995 | Sines | Feb 1923 | A |
4186339 | Finger | Jan 1980 | A |
4713607 | Pepper | Dec 1987 | A |
5095274 | Brokaw | Mar 1992 | A |
5386188 | Minneman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
6023138 | Fried et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
198 38 974 | Mar 2000 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040257063 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60243267 | Oct 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09892850 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 10894240 | US |