The present invention relates generally to optical coherence tomography imaging, and more particularly, to a system and method that uses optical coherence tomography that permits imaging of biological samples with high sensitivity and reduced artifacts, e.g., due to sample and probe motion.
Image artifacts resulting from motion have been important issues of research in many medical imaging modalities because they may degrade the image quality and cause inaccurate clinical interpretation of images. Artifacts can arise when an object being imaged (sample) is moved during data acquisition but is assumed stationary in the image reconstruction process. In each imaging modality, motion artifacts can be present in different forms and with different magnitudes. Understanding basic motion effects in a particular imaging method is an essential step toward the development of techniques to avoid or compensate resulting artifacts. Optical interferometric imaging methods using frequency domain ranging have recently received considerable interest due to their high image acquisition speed and sensitivity.
Two frequency domain techniques have been demonstrated: spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) as described in A. F. Fercher et al., “Measurements of intraocular distances by backscattering spectral interferometry,” Opt. Comm. 117, 43-48 (1995), G. Hausler et al., “Coherence radar and spectral radar—new tools for dermatological diagnosis,” J. Biomed. Opt. 3, 21-31 (1998), M. Wojtkowski et al., “Real time in vivo imaging by high-speed spectral optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 28, 1745-1747 (2003), N. Nassif et al., “In-vivo human retinal imaging by ultra high-speed spectral domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 29, 480-482 (2004), S. H. Yun et al., “High-speed spectral domain optical coherence tomography at 1.3 μm wavelength,” Opt. Express 11, 3598-3604 (2003), and optical frequency domain imaging (“OFDI”) S. R. Chinn, E. Swanson, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Optical coherence tomography using a frequency-tunable optical source,” Opt. Lett. 22, 340-342 (1997), B. Golubovic et al., “Optical frequency-domain reflectometry using rapid wavelength tuning of a Cr4+:forsterite laser,” Opt. Lett. 22, 1704-1706 (1997), F. Lexer et al., “Wavelength-tuning interferometry of intraocular distances,” Appl. Opt. 36, 6548-6553 (1997), S. H. Yun et al, “High-speed optical frequency-domain imaging,” Opt. Express 11, 2953-2963 (2003), the entire disclosures of all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Using the SD-OCT technique, the spectral interference fringe can be measured in the spatial domain by means of a diffraction grating and a charge-coupled device (“CCD”) array. In exemplary OFDI techniques, the spectral fringe is mapped to the time domain by use of a frequency-swept light source and measured with a photodetector as a function of time. In both methods; axial reflectance profile (A-line) is obtained by performing a discrete Fourier transform of the acquired data. Since the Fourier transform process involves integration of the entire data set obtained in single A-line period, the signal-to-noise ratio (“SNR”) is enhanced relative to time domain ranging, as described in S. H. Yun et al., “High-speed optical frequency-domain imaging,” Opt. Express 11, 2953-2963 (2003), R. Leitgeb, et al. “Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 11, 889-894 (2003), J. F. de Boer et al., “Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 28, 2067-2069 (2003), and M. A. Choma et al., “Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 11, 2183-2189 (2003), the entire disclosures of all of which are incorporated herein by reference This improvement in SNR is particularly advantageous for applications requiring high image acquisition rates such as screening for disease and surveillance of large tissue volumes. It is, however, possible that the integration effect enhances the sensitivity to sample motion because the motion-induced change in signal is also integrated over the entire A-line acquisition period.
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (“SD-OCT”) makes use of low-coherence spectral interferometry to obtain cross-sectional images of a biological sample. Interference fringes as a function of wavelength are measured using a broadband light source and a spectrometer based on a charge-coupled-device (“CCD”) camera. The axial reflectivity profile of a sample, or an A-line, can be obtained by a discrete Fourier transform of the camera readout data. This imaging technique has recently gone through rapid technical development to demonstrate high quality imaging of biological samples with fast image acquisition time, an order of magnitude faster than state-of-the-art time-domain OCT systems. The recent advancement in imaging speed may lead to the utilization of SD-OCT in a number of clinical applications in the near future.
The SD-OCT systems that have been used to date utilized either a continuous-wave (“cw”) broad-spectrum light source, such as super luminescent diodes (“SLD”), or ultrashort mode-locked pulses with a high repetition rate in the range of 10-100 MHz. In both cases, the CCD array is generally illuminated constantly, and therefore the exposure time of the CCD camera determines the signal acquisition time for a single A-line. In this case, a path length change in the interferometer during image acquisition results in phase drift in the interference fringe. If the phase drifts over more than μ during a single A-line acquisition, the interference fringe can be completely erased, resulting in a degradation of SNR. This motion artifact can be caused by axial motion of a sample relative to the probe beam. By comparison, transverse sample motion or transverse beam scanning does not result in fringe washout. However, the transverse motion can result in degradation in transverse resolution and SNR. In medical imaging in vivo, the motion effects can arise from various sources. The main causes include patient motion, physiological phenomena such as cardiac motion, blood flow, pulsation, and catheter movement associated with beam scanning or uncontrolled movement of operator's hand. Furthermore, environmental changes such as mechanical vibration, sound waves, and temperature drift can alter the path length difference in the interferometer, resulting in SNR degradation through fringe washout. Considering that cameras appropriate for SD-OCT typically provide exposures times longer than 10 μs, a solution to the fringe washout problem will be required for biomedical applications where sample and probe motion is common.
Therefore, one of the objects of the present invention is to reduce or eliminate the motion artifacts.
According to the present invention, an imaging apparatus/system is provided which includes an optical source and at least one detector array. In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an optical source can emit a broadband spectrum in a pulsed mode, for example, by Q-switching or mode locking, with a pulse repetition rate preferably being equal to a readout rate of a detector array. The pulsed source can produce enough average optical power to provide sufficient signal to noise ratio required for imaging, while the relatively short duration of the output pulses results in an effective signal integration time substantially shorter than the detector's integration time, leading to high-sensitivity motion-artifact-free imaging. This pulsed-source approach may pertain to full-field optical coherence tomography and/or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the optical source is a wavelength-swept source emitting relatively narrowband spectrum swept over a wide range with a repetition rate preferably being equal to the readout rate of the detector array or A-line rate. This exemplary embodiment of the present invention allows the interference signal associated with each spectral component to be measured with an effective integration time substantially shorter than an A-line acquisition time. This exemplary scheme may also eliminate the fringe washout problem as in the prior art using continuous-wave broadband source or high-repetition mode-locked pulses. The above-described exemplary embodiments of the present invention may employ two or more detector arrays for dual-balanced detection and/or polarization diversity and further employ fiber-optic probes, allowing for medical imaging in vivo with high sensitivity, high speed, and the immunity from motion artifacts.
Accordingly, an exemplary embodiment of a system and method for imaging at least a portion of a sample are provided. In particular, at least one source electro-magnetic radiation can be generated and forwarded to the sample and a reference. A signal associated with a combination of at least one first electro-magnetic radiation received from the sample and at least one second electro-magnetic radiation received from the reference can be detected using at least one of a plurality of detectors. At least one particular detector can have a particular electrical integration time. Such detector may received at least a portion of the signal for a time duration which has at least one first portion with at least one first power level that is greater than a predetermined threshold and at least one second portion immediately preceding or following the at least one first portion. The second portion can have at least one second power level which is less than the predetermined threshold, and may be extended for a time period which is approximately at least 10% of the particular electrical integration time.
In addition, the signal may be at least one of frequency components of the combination, and the particular detector can receive such frequency component. The source electro-magnetic radiation can be generated by a source arrangement which may be a pulsed broadband source. The source electro-magnetic radiation generated by the pulsed source may be a single pulse per the particular electrical integration time. The pulsed source may be a Q-switched laser, a cavity-dumped mode-lock laser, and/or a gain-switched laser. The source electro-magnetic radiation generated by the source arrangement may be a burst of radiation that extends for at most approximately 90% of the particular electrical integration time. The burst of radiation may include multiple pulses. The source electro-magnetic radiation generated by the pulsed broadband source can have a spectrum with (i) a center wavelength between approximately 700 nanometers and 2000 nanometers, and/or (ii) a spectral width of approximately greater than 1% of the center wavelength. The source electro-magnetic radiation generated by the pulsed broadband source may have a pulse width approximately shorter than 1 μsec. A duration of the burst of radiation can be approximately shorter than 1 μsec.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the source arrangement generating the source electro-magnetic radiation may include an optical gating switch. A frequency of the source electro-magnetic radiation can vary over time. A mean frequency of the source electro-magnetic radiation may change (i) substantially continuously over time at a tuning speed that is greater than 100 terahertz per millisecond, and/or (ii) with a repetition period that is less than approximately 90% of the particular electrical integration time. The source electro-magnetic radiation can have a tuning range (i) with a center wavelength between approximately 700 nanometers and 2000 nanometers, and/or (ii) of approximately greater than 1% of the center wavelength. The source electro-magnetic radiation may have an instantaneous line width and a tuning range, with the instantaneous line width being less than approximately 10% of the tuning range. The source arrangement may include (i)a tunable laser, (ii) a tunable filter, and/or (iii) a medium, and can generate the source electro-magnetic radiation based on a non-linearity associated with the medium. The frequency may vary substantially (i) linearly with time, and/or (ii) sinusoidally with time.
A detector arrangement which includes the detectors can be provided, that includes an electrical shutter that is adapted to gate a transmission of photoelectrons associated with the combination of the first and second electro-magnetic radiation, wherein a time period for the gating to allow the transmission of the photoelectrons is less than approximately 90% of the particular electrical integration time. The sample can be a biological sample. The detection arrangement may include at least one charged-coupled device. The source arrangement may be a pulsed broadband source. At least one spectral separating unit can be provided which separates spectrum of the first electro-magnetic radiation, the second electro-magnetic radiation and/or the combination into the at least one of the frequency components.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, when taken in conjunction with the appended claims.
Further objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures showing illustrative embodiments of the invention, in which:
a)-(c) are block diagrams of exemplary embodiments of low-repetition broadband source arrangements according to the present invention;
a)-(d) are exemplary graphs of spectrum and temporal characteristics obtained from an exemplary wavelength-swept source;
a)-(c) are block diagrams of exemplary embodiments of an exemplary wavelength-swept source arrangements according to the present invention;
a) is an exemplary illustration of a detection signal of a cw light with a CCD array in a spectrometer;
b) is an exemplary illustration of a detection signal of a pulsed light with a CCD array in a spectrometer;
c) is an exemplary illustration of a detection signal of a swept light with a CCD array in a spectrometer;
a) is a schematic of an exemplary pulsed ASE source;
b) is a schematic of an exemplary wavelength-swept source;
a) and (b) are illustrations of signals of exemplary temporal and spectral output characteristics obtained from the exemplary pulsed ASE source;
c) and (d) are illustrations of signals of exemplary temporal and spectral output characteristics obtained from the exemplary swept source;
a) is an illustration of a variation of a total signal power, a sum of reflectivity of 256 depth points in each A-line, as a function of A-line index or time, obtained from images a and b shown in
b) is an illustration of a variation of a total signal power, a sum of reflectivity of 256 depth points in each A-line, as a function of A-line index or time, obtained from images c and d shown in
c) is an illustration of a variation of a total signal power, a sum of reflectivity of 256 depth points in each A-line, as a function of A-line index or time, obtained from images e and f shown in
The broadband optical source used in prior art can be categorized into two types: continuous wave (“cw”) as shown in
One exemplary embodiment of the present invention relates to a system for imaging of a sample, e.g., biological sample, which may include a source arrangement that generates at least one source electro-magnetic radiation forwarded to the sample and a reference. Such exemplary system may include at least one detection arrangement that has a plurality of detectors, at least one of the detectors capable of detecting a signal associated with a combination of at least one first electro-magnetic radiation received from the sample and at least one second electro-magnetic radiation received from the reference. At least one particular detector may have a particular electrical integration time, and can receive at least a portion of the signal for a time duration which has a first portion with a first power level greater than a predetermined threshold and a second portion immediately preceding or following the first portion. The second portion may have a second power level that is less than the predetermined threshold, and extends for a time period which is approximately more than 10% of the particular electrical integration time.
The electro-magnetic radiation is preferably light with a center wavelength in the range of 700 to 2000 nm. The detector array is preferably charge-coupled devices (“CCD”). Using the exemplary SD-OCT system, the signal detected in the detector array is frequency components of the combination, or the spectrum. Typically the spectrum is obtained using a spectrally separating device such as a diffraction grating. A number of methods to obtain the spectrum with detector arrays are well known in the art. For full-field OCT, the signal is the optical power of the combination, which is linked to specific transverse locations in the sample.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the source arrangement can be a pulsed broadband source generating a single pulse per the particular electrical integration time or producing a burst of radiation that extends for at most approximately 90% of the particular electrical integration time. Each burst may include multiple ultrashort optical pulses in it. Examples of the pulsed sources include a Q-switched laser, a cavity-dumped mode-lock laser, and a gain-switched laser. Preferably, the spectrum of the pulsed source may have a spectral width of approximately greater than 1% of the center wavelength and a pulse width or a duration of the burst of radiation approximately shorter than 1 microseconds. The source arrangement may comprise a broadband cw source and an optical gating switch or electrical shutter integrated in the CCD array. The time window where the optical power is less than the threshold can be considered as OFF state, and the window where the power is greater than the threshold as ON state. The threshold is preferably less than 50% of the power level during ON state, however a typical pulsed source may provide much larger power extinction between the ON and OFF state. During a single detector integration time, one or multiple ON states may exist, however the total illumination span, or the duration from the start of the first ON state to the end of the last ON state is preferably shorter than 90% of the detector integration time. For example, the shorter the illumination span, the more suppression of motion artifacts can be obtained.
In yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the source arrangement can be a wavelength swept source where a mean frequency of the output spectrum varies over time. The mean frequency of the source electro-magnetic radiation may change substantially continuously over time at a tuning speed that is greater than 100 terahertz per millisecond and repeatedly with a repetition period that is less than approximately 90% of the particular electrical integration time. The tuning range of the source electro-magnetic radiation may have a tuning range with a center wavelength between approximately 700 nanometers and 2000 nm, a tuning width of approximately greater than 1% of the center wavelength, and an instantaneous line width of less than approximately 10% of the tuning range. Such a source arrangement includes a tunable laser, soliton laser in conjunction with Raman self frequency shift, or cw broadband source in conjunction with a tunable filter. The mean frequency may vary substantially linearly or sinusoidally with time. As for the pulsed source, the time window where the optical power received by a specific pixel is less than the threshold can be considered as OFF state for the particular pixel, and the window where the power is greater than the threshold as ON state. The threshold is preferably less than 50% of the power level during ON state, however a typical pulsed source may provide much larger power extinction between the ON and OFF state. During the detector integration time of the pixel, one or multiple ON states may exist, however the total illumination span, or the duration from the start of the first ON state to the end of the last ON state is preferably shorter than 90% of the pixel integration time. The shorter the illumination span is, the more suppression of motion artifacts can be obtained.
According to still another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method may be provided for imaging of a sample, typically biological sample. For example, at least one source electro-magnetic radiation may be generated to be forwarded to the sample and a reference. At least a portion of a signal associated may be detected with a combination of at least one first electro-magnetic radiation received from the sample and at least one second electro-magnetic radiation received from the reference using at least one detector of a plurality of detectors of a detection arrangement. At least one particular detector may have a particular electrical integration time, and can receive at least a portion of the signal for a time duration which has a first portion with a first power level greater than a predetermined threshold and a second portion immediately preceding or following the first portion. The second portion may have a second power level less than the predetermined threshold, and can extend for a time period which is approximately more than 10% of the particular electrical integration time.
a)-(d) illustrate graphs to explain the principle of another exemplary embodiment of the present invention based on a wavelength-swept source which emits substantially narrowband spectrum that is swept over a wide spectral range, repeatedly in time.
As shown in
Exemplary conventional SD-OCT systems utilize either a continuous-wave (cw) broad-spectrum light source, such as super luminescent diodes (SLD), or ultrashort mode-locked pulses with a high repetition rate in the range of 10-100 MHz. Full field OCT systems have typically employed cw thermal light source. For such conventional systems, the CCD array is illuminated constantly, and therefore the exposure time of the CCD camera determines the signal acquisition time for a single A-line. However, sample or probe motion during the A-line acquisition time can result in various undesirable artifacts such as signal fading and spatial resolution degradation. In particular, due to axial sample motion, the visibility of detected spectral fringes can diminish significantly resulting in significant image fading. Considering that cameras appropriate for SD-OCT typically provide exposures times longer than 10 μs, a solution to the fringe washout problem is preferable for biomedical applications where sample and probe motion is common.
a)-(c) illustrates exemplary illustration of a detection signal with a CCD array in a spectrometer how the signal detection in the exemplary SD-OCT system for three different light sources: broadband cw source (see
In particular,
To understand the imaging characteristics of a pulsed-source SD-OCT system, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for pulsed and cw operation in the presence of axial motion may be reviewed. For example, let Ts and Te denote the duration of the pulse and the electrical integration time of the camera, respectively. For a sample moving axially in parallel to an optical probe beam with a speed vz, the signal power S, normalized to the signal at vz=0, is given by
S≈|∫0T
where P(t) represents time-varying optical power of the pulse, and k0=2π/λ0 denotes the wave number corresponding to the center wavelength λ0. Equation 1 yields S≈sin2(k0Δz)/(k0Δz)2 for a square pulse and S≈exp[−k02Δz2 /(2ln 2)]0 for a Gaussian pulse with Ts as the full-width-at-half-maximum (“FWHM”) pulse duration, where Δz=vzTs represents the total sample movement during pulse duration Ts. These expressions imply that significant signal fading occurs if the sample movement is greater than a half optical wavelength during the pulse duration. Therefore, the short pulsed technique (Ts<<Te) offers a significant advantage over the conventional cw operation in terms of motion-induced signal fading. Similarly, one can see that pulsed operation can also suppress other motion artifacts, such as spatial resolution degradation due to sample motion and transverse beam scanning.
The fundamental noise characteristics of pulsed operation are likely approximately identical to those of cw operation, because the detection bandwidth is solely determined by the integration time of the camera. If both a pulsed and cw sources produce the same average optical power and relative intensity noise (“RIN”), both would yield the same SNR in the limit of a stationary sample.
c) shows signals generated using another exemplary techniques that uses another exemplary pulsed-source SD-OCT approach that is based on a narrowband, wavelength-swept source. Since the optical spectrum 440 incident to the CCD array 420 is continuously changed in time, each of the CCD pixels receives its corresponding spectral component only for a short time interval. As with pulsed broad bandwidth illumination, rapidly sweeping the wavelength allows the SD-OCT signal to be free from signal fading due to fringe washout. However, unlike pulsed operation, individual “spectrum pulses” do not arrive at the CCD pixels at the same time.
For a linear sweep shown in
For example, pulsed and wavelength-swept sources may be constructed according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. A block diagram of the exemplary system of the present invention which includes a gating device is shown in
b) shows a block diagram of another exemplary embodiment of a system according to the present invention which includes the wavelength-swept laser. The laser employed the same SOA 450 and a scanning wavelength filter based on a polygonal mirror scanner 460 in a fiber-optic ring laser cavity 468. The scanning filter consisted of a diffraction grating 470 (830 lines per mm), two lenses in 4f configuration (472; f=60 mm, 474; f=63.5 mm), and the same 40-facet polygonal mirror scanner 460 as used for the pulsed source. The scanning filter can be configured to have a free spectral range of 275 nm centered at 1320 nm wavelength, which may result in a duty cycle of the laser output closely matched to that of the CCD camera (46%). When the pass band of the filter scans outside the gain bandwidth of the SOA, the source likely does not reach the lasing threshold and simply produces ASE.
d) shows an exemplary output spectrum measured with the optical spectrum analyzer in a peak-hold mode. In a peak-hold mode, the contribution of ASE to the measurement would be negligible owing to its much lower spectral density than laser light at a given time. Therefore, the measured spectrum represents the tuning envelope of the swept laser. The tuning range was approximately 135 nm, centered at 1325 nm. An exemplary instantaneous linewidth of the swept output was approximately 0.4 nm, as determined by measuring the coherence length with a variable-delay interferometer.
The camera readout can be triggered by an external TTL signal generated from the source output. In the case of the pulsed light source, the electrical trigger pulses were generated directly from the optical pulses, as illustrated in the dotted box in
As described above, both lasers may be operated at a repetition rate of 18.939 kHz. This rate corresponded to the maximum readout rate of the camera. Upon receiving the trigger, the camera integrates photo-generated electrons for 24.4 μs; in the subsequent 28.4 μs period, the integrated voltage can be read out. By adjusting the phase delay in a PPL pulse generator, the integration time window of the camera was aligned to the output of the light sources, as shown in
SD-OCT imaging can be performed using three different light sources: (a) the cw ASE obtained directly from the SOA, (b) the intensity-gated ASE pulses (as shown in
To quantify the amount of signal fading, a sum of the pixel values in the unit of linear power along each A-line may be obtained from the exemplary images shown in
In each graph, the integrated signal power is plotted as a function of A-line index for the stationary-sample image (a lighter line) and the moving-sample image (a darker line). As depicted by the lighter lines, the signal power for the stationary sample exhibits random fluctuation due to speckle as the probe beam is scanned across the sample with standard deviation of approximately 2 dB. The speckle-averaged mean value varies linearly over transverse locations of the sample, a variation that was attributed to the finite confocal parameter and resulting depth-dependent light collection efficiency. The signal power traces obtained from
The time gated pulses may provide a factor 8.6 reduction in signal integration time, from 24.4 μs to 2.85 μs. For the swept source with an instantaneous linewidth of 0.4 nm, individual CCD pixels may be illuminated for only 75 ns per each A-line acquisition representing a 325-fold reduction in signal integration time. Theoretical curves based on Eq. (1) show good correspondence with the experimental results with the following exceptions. The experimental noise floor can prohibit detection of signal loss greater than −14 dB; the small discrepancy between the blue and black curves in
An exemplary SNR analysis indicates that the pulsed ASE source produced essentially the same noise characteristics as cw ASE of the same average optical power. However, images which may be acquired using the wavelength swept laser exhibited a noise floor that can be 10-20 dB higher, depending on depth, than that observed when using the ASE source of the same average power. We attribute this increased noise floor to the RIN of the swept laser in the frequency band from DC to 41 kHz corresponding to a reciprocal of the CCD integration time. The best sensitivity obtained with the swept source may be approximately −95 dB at a reference-arm power of 1-2 μW.
Exemplary SD-OCT imaging of a human coronary artery in vitro may be conducted by use of a fiber-optic catheter. The fiber-optic catheter comprised a graded-index lens and a 90-degree prism at its distal end and was connected to the interferometer through a high-speed rotational joint which could provide a rotational speed of up 100 revolutions per second (rps).
Image A may represent a typical OCT image of a vessel. In contrast, Image B can exhibit distinct radial streaks due to loss of signal. This image fading may be attributed mainly to catheter-induced modulation in path length, increasing with the rotational speed. The path length modulation can result from three mechanisms: (a) rotational beam scanning of an off-center object inevitably results in axial path length variation of the probe beam, as if the probe was retracting or approaching to the sample; (b) the tip of a rotating catheter can wobble in a protection sheath to modulate the distance between the probe and the sample; (c) mechanical vibration from a rotation joint can modulate the length of the optical fiber inside the catheter by twist or strain. Such third mechanism was thought to a dominant cause in this particular experiment, since the circle (p) corresponding to the prism surface also suffers from significant loss of contrast at the same radial locations. Images C and D of
Thus, multiple strategies can be applied to realize the benefit of pulsed or gated illumination. Traditional light sources include cw SLD's, supercontinuum sources, or mode-locked lasers. Each of these sources can be converted into a pulsed source by use of an external intensity modulation scheme. As an intensity modulator or switch, one may consider electro-optic or acousto-optic modulators or injection current modulation. Alternatively, CCD cameras with built-in electrical shutters may be used. This external gating approach, however, has a main drawback in that it results in a loss of optical power and therefore may degrade the detection sensitivity. However, in situations where motion causes significant signal fading through fringe washout, external gating can lead to a better sensitivity despite the loss of optical power. In other applications, however, the usable optical power in the system is often limited by the maximum permissible exposure of the sample. In this case, external gating would be an effective way to attenuate the power level entering the system from a powerful source. For example, ophthalmologic retinal imaging has been performed with SD-OCT at a wavelength of 800-nm. At this wavelength, the maximum permissible cw exposure to the eyes is limited to approximately 600-700 μW according to American National Standards Institute (ANSI). For this application, one could gate the output from a commercially available mode-locked Ti:Sapphire laser and, while still providing sufficient power to the system, reduce sensitivity to motion by more than an order of magnitude.
Instead of external gating, various power-efficient internal modulation techniques may be employed. For example, Q-switching and cavity dumping are well known techniques applicable to ultrashort pulsed lasers. Q-switched supercontinuum sources with repetition rates of a few to tens of kHz have been reported and may be suitable for use in the exemplary SD-OCT systems. Beside the benefit of reducing motion artifacts, the reduced fringe washout of the pulsed source approach may also facilitate quadrature fringe detection based on sequential phase dithering.
The use of a wavelength swept source as described in this manuscript is essentially a hybrid between the OFDI and SD-OCT techniques that may permit otherwise less-flexible OFDI source requirements including narrow instantaneous linewidth and tuning linearity to be relaxed. In this case, the high resolution and linearity of the spectrometer can accommodate a swept laser with a nonlinear tuning element such as a resonantly scanned Fabry-Perot filter or a tunable source based on soliton self-frequency shifting in nonlinear fibers. Furthermore, the relaxed requirement on the instantaneous linewidth of a swept laser may facilitate the generation of higher output powers.
In another exemplary embodiment of the system according to the present invention, each of the CCD arrays can be a 2-dimensional array. Two dimensional simultaneous scanning can be performed by using the 2-dimensional array, where along one axis of the array spectral information is encoded, while across the second dimension spatial information is encoded.
As yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a pulsed source can be employed in full-field optical coherence tomography, as depicted in
The invention disclosed here may be used in various imaging applications, ranging from coronary artery imaging, GI tract, ophthalmologic imaging, to monitoring of dynamic biological or chemical process, moving materials and components, where high-sensitivity, high-speed, motion-artifact-free imaging is preferred.
The foregoing merely illustrates the principles of the invention. Various modifications and alterations to the described embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the teachings herein. For example, the invention described herein is usable with the exemplary methods, systems and apparatus described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/514,769 filed Oct. 27, 2003, and International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/02349 filed on Jan. 24, 2003, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise numerous systems, arrangements and methods which, although not explicitly shown or described herein, embody the principles of the invention and are thus within the spirit and scope of the present invention. In addition, all publications, patents and patent applications referenced above are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The present invention claims priority from U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/608,800 filed on Sep. 10, 2004, the entire disclosure of which incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2339754 | Brace | Jan 1944 | A |
4295738 | Meltz et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4300816 | Snitzer et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4585349 | Gross et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4601036 | Faxvog et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4631498 | Cutler | Dec 1986 | A |
4770492 | Levin et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4868834 | Fox et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4925302 | Cutler | May 1990 | A |
4928005 | Lefevre et al. | May 1990 | A |
4965441 | Picard | Oct 1990 | A |
4993834 | Carlhoff et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5039193 | Snow et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5040889 | Keane | Aug 1991 | A |
5045936 | Lobb et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5046501 | Crilly | Sep 1991 | A |
5065331 | Vachon et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5120953 | Harris | Jun 1992 | A |
5127730 | Brelje et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5197470 | Helfer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202745 | Sorin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5248876 | Kerstens et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5262644 | Maguire | Nov 1993 | A |
5291885 | Taniji et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293872 | Alfano et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293873 | Fang | Mar 1994 | A |
5304810 | Amos | Apr 1994 | A |
5305759 | Kaneko et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5317389 | Hochberg et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5353790 | Jacques et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5383467 | Auer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5419323 | Kittrell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5439000 | Gunderson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441053 | Lodder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450203 | Penkethman | Sep 1995 | A |
5454807 | Lennox et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459325 | Hueton et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459570 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465147 | Swanson | Nov 1995 | A |
5486701 | Norton et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491524 | Hellmuth et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491552 | Knuttel | Feb 1996 | A |
5526338 | Hasman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5562100 | Kittrell et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565986 | Knüttel | Oct 1996 | A |
5583342 | Ichie | Dec 1996 | A |
5590660 | MacAulay et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600486 | Gal et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601087 | Gunderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623336 | Raab et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5697373 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5698397 | Zarling et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710630 | Essenpreis et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719399 | Alfano et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735276 | Lemelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5748598 | Swanson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784352 | Swanson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785651 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795295 | Hellmuth et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801826 | Williams | Sep 1998 | A |
5803082 | Stapleton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807261 | Benaron et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817144 | Gregory | Oct 1998 | A |
5840023 | Oraevsky et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842995 | Mahadevan-Jansen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843000 | Nishioka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843052 | Benja-Athon | Dec 1998 | A |
5847827 | Fercher | Dec 1998 | A |
5865754 | Sevick-Muraca et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867268 | Gelikonov et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871449 | Brown | Feb 1999 | A |
5877856 | Fercher | Mar 1999 | A |
5887009 | Mandella et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892583 | Li | Apr 1999 | A |
5920373 | Bille | Jul 1999 | A |
5920390 | Farahi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921926 | Rolland et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949929 | Hamm | Sep 1999 | A |
5951482 | Winston et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956355 | Swanson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968064 | Selmon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983125 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987346 | Benaron et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991697 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994690 | Kulkarni et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002480 | Izatt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004314 | Wei et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006128 | Izatt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010449 | Selmon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6033721 | Nassuphis | Mar 2000 | A |
6044288 | Wake et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048742 | Weyburne et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053613 | Wei et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069698 | Ozawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6091496 | Hill | Jul 2000 | A |
6091984 | Perelman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111645 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117128 | Gregory | Sep 2000 | A |
6120516 | Selmon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134003 | Tearney et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134010 | Zavislan | Oct 2000 | A |
6134033 | Bergano et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141577 | Rolland et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151522 | Alfano et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159445 | Klaveness et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160826 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161031 | Hochmann et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166373 | Mao | Dec 2000 | A |
6174291 | McMahon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175669 | Colston et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185271 | Kinsinger | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191862 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193676 | Winston et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198956 | Dunne | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201989 | Whitehead et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208415 | De Boer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208887 | Clarke | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6249349 | Lauer | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263234 | Engelhardt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272376 | Marcu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282011 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308092 | Hoyns | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324419 | Guzelsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6341036 | Tearney et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353693 | Kano et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377349 | Fercher | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384915 | Everett et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393312 | Hoyns | May 2002 | B1 |
6394964 | Sievert, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421164 | Tearney et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6445944 | Ostrovsky | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463313 | Winston et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469846 | Ebizuka et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6485413 | Boppart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485482 | Belef | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501551 | Tearney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6549801 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552796 | Magnin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556305 | Aziz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556853 | Cabib et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558324 | Von Behren et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564087 | Pitris et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564089 | Izatt et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6615071 | Casscells, III et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622732 | Constantz | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6680780 | Fee | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685885 | Nolte et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687007 | Meigs | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687010 | Horii et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6806963 | Wälti et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816743 | Moreno et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6980299 | de Boer | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7006231 | Ostrovsky et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
20010047137 | Moreno et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016533 | Marchitto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020085209 | Mittleman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122246 | Tearney et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161357 | Rox et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163622 | Magnin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196446 | Roth et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198457 | Tearney et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023153 | Izatt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026735 | Nolte et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030135101 | Webler | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171691 | Casscells, III et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030236443 | Cespedes et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040150829 | Koch et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166593 | Nolte et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050018201 | De Boer | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4309056 | Sep 1994 | DE |
19542955 | May 1997 | DE |
0110201 | Jun 1984 | EP |
0251062 | Jan 1998 | EP |
1426799 | Jun 2004 | EP |
2209221 | May 1989 | GB |
4135550 | May 1992 | JP |
4135551 | May 1992 | JP |
9219930 | Nov 1992 | WO |
9303672 | Mar 1993 | WO |
9533971 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9732182 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9814132 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9835203 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9848838 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9944089 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9957507 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0058766 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0138820 | May 2001 | WO |
0142735 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0236015 | May 2002 | WO |
0238040 | May 2002 | WO |
0254027 | Jul 2002 | WO |
03020119 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03062802 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004105598 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060055936 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60608800 | Sep 2004 | US |