System and method for robotic inspection

Abstract
A method for robotic inspection of a part, includes the steps of: supporting the part with a robot mechanism; obtaining part-related sensor input with a sensor positioned to inspect the part supported by the robot mechanism; and controlling movement of the robot mechanism relative to the sensor, wherein the controlling is done by a feedback control unit which receives the sensor input, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input.
Description
BACKGROUND

The disclosure relates to robotic inspection of a part and, more particularly, to an automated system and method for inspecting mechanical components, especially turbine blades.


It is well known that mechanical components may incur imperfections during manufacturing and may suffer wear and damage during operation. These components, therefore, are episodically or periodically inspected for imperfections, damage, deformation, and wear. In particular, mechanical components such as turbine disks and airfoils have complex mechanical shapes that are difficult to manufacture and are operated under stresses that cause damage, e.g., leading edge erosion, hot corrosion (sulfidation), cracks, dents, nicks, gouges, etc. from foreign object damage. These turbine disks and airfoils are currently inspected manually by visual inspection or by non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques such as eddy current, ultrasound, or fluorescent penetrant inspection. These inspections are tedious, time consuming, imprecise, and error prone. Techniques to automate these types of inspection have been emerging, but the automated detection and operation can be improved.


Manual turbine blade damage detection is known in the prior art, e.g. using embedded vibroacoustic sensing and strain sensing. This prior art uses embedded or contacting sensors and is intended for wind turbines where the blades to not suffer the impact, erosional, or corrosion that gas turbine blades suffer. Also, blade damage detection for gas turbines is known, e.g. using eddy current sensors or by using mechanical touch probes, e.g., a coordinate measuring machine (CMM), but these require slow, laborious scanning of the blade surface.


It is known to process borescope video of blades in an engine to determine damage. This approach analyzes two dimensional (2D) images for differences between the current image and a model learned from other 2D images in a blade row. This is not suitable for determining damage in absolute units for components outside an engine. There is additional prior art for 2D (image-based) inspection systems wherein many steps are performed to determine the pose of an inspection device (a camera) with respect to the part and an a priori engineering model so that differences between the part and the model may be determined. This particular approach is unnecessarily inefficient and error prone. Some methods use X-rays, which requires special, shielded equipment.


SUMMARY

In accordance with the present disclosure, there is provided a method for robotic inspection of a part, which comprises the steps of: supporting the part with a robot mechanism; obtaining part-related sensor input with a sensor positioned to inspect the part supported by the robot mechanism; controlling movement of the robot mechanism relative to the sensor, wherein the controlling is done by a feedback control unit which receives the sensor input, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input.


In accordance with a further non-limiting embodiment, the method further comprises the steps of storing the part-related sensor input, or information derived therefrom, as past sensor input in a storage in communication with the feedback control unit and controlling movement of the robot mechanism based upon current sensor input and the past sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the feedback control unit is further configured to plan a path of movement, relative to the sensor, of the part supported by the robot mechanism, wherein the path of movement is determined based upon the past sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the sensor has a controllable lens and the feedback control unit is configured to control the lens based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the sensor further comprises a plurality of lenses and an automated lens changing system for positioning a lens of said plurality of lenses along a line of sight from the sensor to the part, and the method further comprises the step of changing the lens along the line of sight based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, at least one filter is positioned along a line of sight from the sensor to the part, and the method further comprises the step of operating the filter based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the method further comprises illuminating the part with an illumination mechanism, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the illumination mechanism based on the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, at least one filter is positioned along a line of sight from the light mechanism to the part, and the method further comprises the step of operating the filter based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the illumination mechanism further comprises a controllable lens, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the lens based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input and manual input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the method further comprises the step of annotating the part based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, an inspection system for robotic inspection of a part, comprises a robot mechanism configured to support the part, the robot mechanism being moveable to adjust position and pose of the part; a sensor positioned to obtain part-related sensor input of the part supported by the robot mechanism; and a feedback control unit in communication with the sensor to receive the part-related sensor input, the feedback control unit being configured to control movement of the robot mechanism based on the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the system further comprises a storage in communication with at least one of the sensor and the feedback control unit, the storage being configured to receive and store the part-related sensor input or information derived therefrom.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the feedback control unit is further configured to plan a path of movement, relative to the sensor, of the part supported by the robot mechanism, wherein the path of movement is determined based upon the past sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the sensor has a controllable lens and the feedback control unit is configured to control the lens based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the sensor further comprises a plurality of lenses and an automated lens changing system for positioning a lens of said plurality of lenses along a line of sight from the sensor to the part, and the feedback control unit is configured to change the lens along the line of sight based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, at least one filter is positioned along a line of sight from the sensor to the part, and the feedback control unit is configured to operate the filter based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, an illumination mechanism is provided for illuminating the part, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the illumination mechanism based on the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, at least one filter is positioned along a line of sight from the illumination mechanism to the part, and the feedback control unit is configured to operate the filter based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the illumination mechanism further comprises a controllable lens, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the lens based upon the part-related sensor input.


In a further non-limiting embodiment, the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input and manual input.


Other details of the process are set forth in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals depict like elements.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a non-limiting embodiment of an automated system and process for automated component inspection;



FIG. 2 illustrates a further non-limiting embodiment; and



FIG. 3 illustrates a further non-limiting embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure relates to the automated inspection of a part such as a turbine blade or the like.


Various mechanical system components such as turbine blades, disks, and airfoils, require inspection for damage, defects, the need for repair and/or maintenance, and the like. One form of such inspection is automated inspection. During such inspection, the part is supported by a robot mechanism in a position relative to a sensor such that the position and pose of the part relative to the sensor can be adjusted primarily through movement of the robot mechanism. As disclosed herein, the position and pose of the part relative to the sensor are adjusted based upon part-related sensor input so that control of the position and pose of the part can be coupled to automated detection or inspection results. Thus, following this approach, an inspection can be conducted to focus more specifically on a location of a part which the current and/or past inspection has indicated a reason for further and/or more focused inspection to be conducted. Thus, according to the disclosure, robot motion is coupled to automated detection results. Another approach would be a “hybrid” approach, wherein the system is mostly automatic, but is configured to reach out to some other system or person for either confirmation, for example to help avoid re-certifying the inspection process, for annotation, and for guidance such as, for example, where to pay attention next, or for further analysis. For example, the system could reach out to a human on site or at a remote station, humans in the cloud or a more powerful image processing system in the cloud.



FIG. 1 shows a system 10 including a robot mechanism 12, a sensor mechanism 14, and a feedback control unit 16. As will be discussed further below, feedback control unit 16 controls operation of robot mechanism 12 to control the position and pose of a part 18 held by robot mechanism 12 relative to sensor mechanism 14.


Robot mechanism 12 can have various support mechanisms to hold part 18, such support mechanisms being schematically illustrated by graspers 19 in FIG. 1. Such support mechanisms can hold part 18 mechanically, or with suction or vacuum, or through any other manner suitable for firmly holding the part for inspection as desired.


Robot mechanism 12 is typically a fully articulated arm configured to allow multi direction adjustment of the position of a part, and particularly including rotation and orientation of the part at a particular location, which is referred to herein as the pose of the part. The position in which robot mechanism 12 holds part 18 is with respect to sensor mechanism 14, and the different positioning and pose allows for full inspection of the part.


Sensor mechanism 14 can be any of a wide variety of different sensors, such as image sensors, thermal sensors, or the like. Sensor mechanism 14 can, by way of further non-limiting example, comprise one or more two-dimensional (2D) cameras, three-dimensional (3D) depth sensors, and/or sonic sensor arrays, operating in any portion of the electromagnetic spectrum or acoustic spectrum (as relevant), to capture current information of a part under inspection. In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 1, sensor mechanism 14 is an image sensor or camera, which obtains as sensor input a sequence of images or video of a part supported in robot mechanism 12. This sensor input is referred to herein as part-related sensor input, and can be image data of the part, for example. The part-related sensor input can provide input to feedback control unit 16, for example through an image processing unit 20, and/or can be input to a storage unit 22. Components which pass data such as sensor input or control instructions are said herein to be communicated with each other, and/or in communication with each other. Thus, sensor mechanism 14 can be in communication with feedback control unit 16, optionally through image processing unit 20, and can also be in communication with storage unit 22.


The information or sensor input is processed and stored in a database, for example in storage unit 22, in such a way that relationships between the current inspection and previous inspections are established. The results of the current and previous inspections are provided to feedback control unit 16. One way to establish relationships is to add metadata about each inspection to the data stored in the database such as the individual part type, serial number, inspection date and time, inspection software version number, and the like.


Feedback control unit 16 can be any of a wide variety of processing units configured to execute and/or send various machine language commands including but not limited to commands which can be sent to robot mechanism 12 for controlling movement thereof. In addition, feedback control unit 16 can be configured to process sensor input from sensor mechanism 14 or receive processed sensor input from image processing unit 20. Feedback control unit 16 can also be in communication with storage unit 22 for accessing past part-related sensor input, for example. Feedback control unit 16 can also be in communication with a separate storage unit 24, which may contain various programming and machine executable instructions for controlling operation of the feedback control unit 16.


Of particular interest in the present disclosure, feedback control unit 16 is advantageously configured to control movement of the robot mechanism based on feedback from the sensor mechanism of a current inspection. Thus, if the part-related sensor input received in real time from the sensor mechanism indicates an area of a part needs to be inspected more closely or at a different pose, feedback control unit 16 is configured to send instructions to the robot mechanism to make such adjustments and enhance the inspection. In one non-limiting embodiment, feedback control 16 may implement a feedback control algorithm designed to reduce uncertainty or resolve a non-binary probability in damage detection of part 18. That is, image processing unit 20 may use a statistical damage detection algorithm that provides a probability of detection. If in any instance this probability is not zero or one, feedback control unit 16 may iteratively change the pose, illumination, and/or sensing of part 18 to drive the probability or detection to either zero or one. The feedback control may be considered or implemented as an optimization process with uncertainty as its objective function. In one case, the optimization may comprise a complete exploration of the parameter space.


Also of interest, since feedback control unit 16 has access to past part-related sensor input, which for example may be stored in storage unit 22, the initial movement path of robot mechanism 12 can be set or adjusted to focus specifically on areas of already identified interest, such as defects already detected in a disk, blade row, or the like. Thus, feedback control unit 16 provides path planning based on prior information such as past part-related sensor input.


A further aspect of interest with respect to interaction of feedback control unit 16 in system 10, related to the path planning mentioned above, is to design the initial movement path of robot mechanism based on past part-related sensor input such that a maximum amount of information is gained by the inspection. In other words, the position and pose of the part can be selected by feedback control unit 16 such that knowledge of a particular part being inspected is maximized per each movement path of robot mechanism 12 and part 18 supported thereby relative to sensor mechanism 14.


In a further non-limiting aspect of the present disclosure, an illumination mechanism 26 can be provided for illuminating part 18 supported by robot mechanism 12 such that sensor mechanism 14 can obtain more clear and well illuminated part-related sensor input. Illumination mechanism 26 can be any suitable source of light which is suitable for enhancing inspection of a part. Such light can be in the visible spectrum, or in other spectra suitable to various types of inspection which may be desired. Further, illumination mechanism 26 can be controlled by feedback control unit 16 in a basic sense to power on or off, and also to increase or decrease intensity and/or type of illumination, such as wavelength, band of wavelengths, polarization, spatial structure, and the like. Controllable filters can be included in both the illumination mechanism 26 and sensor mechanism 14 to allow automated selection of wavelength and polarization.


All such control can be based upon current or past part-related sensor input. For example, if past part-related sensor input indicated a portion of a complex structure was not properly illuminated during inspection, position and pose of the part can be adjusted, as can intensity of light from illumination mechanism 26, to obtain better part-related sensor input in the next inspection and/or for the remainder of the current inspection.


Returning to sensor mechanism 14, a further non-limiting embodiment includes sensor mechanism 14 having a controllable lens schematically illustrated at 28. Controllable lens 28 can allow for enhanced specific inspection of a particular area of a part, thus enhancing proper positioning and pose of the part relative to the sensor by allowing focus from the sensor side as well. Lens 28 can be controlled by feedback control unit 16 as with other components of system 10, again so that results of current and past part inspection can be used to enhance movement of robot mechanism 12 and focus of sensor mechanism 14 to produce more accurate and effective inspection. It should also be appreciated that within the scope of a controllable lens 28 is a lens system with physical lens changes, for example where the desired or intended change (e.g. magnification) is more than can be accomplished with a single adjustable lens. In this configuration, the system can be configured to operate an automated lens changing system. FIG. 2 further illustrates certain aspects of system 10, including sensor mechanism 14 having an interchangeable lens system schematically illustrated at 29 and being configured to switch out lens 28 with one or more different lenses 28a, 28b . . . 28x. Interchangeable lens system could be controlled by feedback control unit 16, again as schematically illustrated, and could utilize conveyors, robots, or any other mechanism suitable for removing and replacing lens 28.


As set forth above, one or more filters can also be incorporated into system 10 to modify operation of either sensor mechanism 14 and lens 28, or illumination mechanism 26 and/or lens 30. FIG. 2 shows filters 31, 33 positioned for this purpose, in this case along a line of sight from either lens 28 or lens 30, or both, to part 18. As with lens 28, 30, filters 31, 33 can be controllable and/or interchangeable to adapt the system to produce useful imaging and analysis. FIG. 2 also shows schematic control connections, or communications, between feedback control unit 16 and components of sensor mechanism 14, illumination mechanism 26 and interchangeable lens system 29.


Similarly, illumination mechanism 26 can have a controllable lens 30 which can be used to focus, diffuse, or otherwise adjust light being directed to part 18 during inspection. Feedback control unit 16 is configured and in communication with illumination mechanism 26 to control lens 30 to focus light from illumination mechanism 26 in a way which is directed by results of current or past inspection and part-related sensor input. Again, by way of non-limiting example, if a portion of a part is not clearly seen in images obtained during either a prior or current inspection, this will be identified by feedback control unit 16 and instructions sent to robot mechanism 12 to change position or pose of the part relative to sensor mechanism 14, and also in this case to adjust focus of light emitted by illumination mechanism 26 to more fully illuminate a formerly obscured or not clearly inspected area of the part. Lens 28 and/or filters 31, 33 could also be adjusted.


Still referring to FIG. 1, feedback control unit 16 can also be configured to produce controllable annotation 32. Annotation 32 may be accomplished by any device capable of depositing ink or other indicia onto part 18. For example, a deposition device may comprise a controllable inkjet print head schematically illustrated at 34 (FIG. 3). A fiducial mark 36 denoting a detected damage location may be deposited onto part 18 by the deposition device. The fiducial mark may comprise any unique and/or distinguishable mark capable of being detected by image processing unit 20 via sensor mechanism 14. For example, a fiducial mark may comprise a dot, line, circle, square, polygon, numerical values, Roman numerals, alphabetical characters, or any other distinguishable marks. The ink may comprise a high temperature resistant marking agent. In general, the ink may comprise any subsequently detectable material, e.g., the ink may be visibly detectable as described, may contain infrared fluorescent constituents, radioactive tracers, and the like. Similarly, sensor mechanism 14 may be additionally sensitive to non-human-visible portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, radiation, and the like. In one non-limiting embodiment, the ink could be a high-temperature, non-reactive blue ink such as DYKEM® High Temp 44 Medium Blue (Item #44094 from American Marking, Inc.), or the ink described in US Application No. 2003/0101899 to Hartanto. The deposition device may be spatially controllable to move relative to part 18, may be spatially stationary while robot mechanism 12 moves part 18, or a combination of the above.


The method of operation of system 10 can be further discussed and understood through consideration of FIG. 1 as a process scheme. System 10 begins operation with a part 18 supported by robot mechanism 12. Initial inspection may already be programmed and stored in either storage unit 22 or 24 for conducting an initial inspection of the part. Such initial inspection data may be the result of an earlier inspection using system 10, could be generated based on expected part-related data, could be based on mimicking a one-time human inspection, and the like. Once inspection starts, part-related sensor input is obtained with sensor mechanism 14 and communicated to image processing unit 20. Sensor input is processed and the processed input is sent to and stored in storage unit 22. In addition, processed sensor input is received by feedback control unit 16. Feedback control unit 16 analyzes such input and generates control instructions which are sent to robot mechanism 12, and also to sensor mechanism and/or illumination mechanism 26 as desired. These control instructions adjust the positon and pose, as well as sensor and/or light focus, to obtain additional sensor input related to part 18, which is obtained and fed to image processing unit 20 and feedback control unit 16 for further analysis and issuance of control commands by feedback control unit 16. This can continue until inspection is considered complete, either through substantive passing of inspection, or obtaining a predetermined amount of additional part-related sensor data, or the like.


As disclosed herein, feedback control unit 16 operates to provide one or more of the following:


Repositioning based on the current inspection, e.g., to re-inspect from a different relative location or pose and combine the new inspection results with the previous results using, for instance, a Bayesian damage estimator, to produce a first fused inspection result. The re-inspection process may now continue with the first fused inspection result used as the previous inspection result. This iterative process can terminate when the fused result is the same as the previous result or when a predetermined number of iterations is reached, for example.


Inspection path planning can be based on prior information such as already detected defects in a disk, blade row, and the like. That is, a default sequence of location and pose robot controls may be modified based on the spatial probability of damage and the probability that the current part is related to previous parts. This path planning may exploit UAV probabilistic search path planning as modified for part similarity.


Inspection path planning can also be based on expected information gain. The expected information gain is the change in information from a prior state, or previous inspection, to a state that takes some information as known (current inspection). That is, a default sequence of location and pose robot controls may be modified to make a next inspection where the expected information gain is maximized. The information gain may be learned from previous inspections, which can serve as training examples, and may be fixed after training, or may be adapted continuously during inspection.


There has been provided a system and method for automated inspection of a part which provides for a coupling of robot motion with current and/or past inspection results, thereby reducing uncertainty in detection and producing a more fully automated and reliable part inspection. While the system and method have been described in the context of specific embodiments thereof, other unforeseen alternatives, modifications, and variations may become apparent to those skilled in the art having read the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace those alternatives, modifications, and variations which fall within the broad scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for robotic inspection of a part, comprising the steps of: supporting the part with a robot mechanism;obtaining part-related sensor input with a sensor positioned to inspect the part supported by the robot mechanism;controlling movement of the robot mechanism relative to the sensor, wherein the controlling is done by a feedback control unit which receives the sensor input, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input, wherein the part is a turbine blade, disk or airfoil of a gas turbine engine,further comprising illuminating the part with an illumination mechanism, and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to control the illumination mechanism based on the part-related sensor input, and further comprising at least one filter positioned along a line of sight from the illumination mechanism to the part, and further comprising the step of operating the filter based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of storing the part-related sensor input, or information derived therefrom, as past sensor input in a storage in communication with the feedback control unit and controlling movement of the robot mechanism based upon current sensor input and the past sensor input.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the feedback control unit is further configured to plan a path of movement, relative to the sensor, of the part supported by the robot mechanism, wherein the path of movement is determined based upon the past sensor input.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor has a controllable lens and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to control the lens based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the illumination mechanism further comprises a controllable lens, and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to control the lens based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input and manual input.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of annotating the part based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the controlling step moves the part to an adjusted position of the part relative to the sensor, and further comprising obtaining additional sensor input at the adjusted position.
  • 9. A method for robotic inspection of a part, comprising the steps of: supporting the part with a robot mechanism;obtaining part-related sensor input with a sensor positioned to inspect the part supported by the robot mechanism;controlling movement of the robot mechanism relative to the sensor, wherein the controlling is done by a feedback control unit which receives the sensor input, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input, wherein the sensor further comprises a plurality of lenses and an automated lens changing system for positioning a lens of said plurality of lenses along a line of sight from the sensor to the part, and further comprising the step of changing the lens along the line of sight based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 10. A method for robotic inspection of a part, comprising the steps of: supporting the part with a robot mechanism;obtaining part-related sensor input with a sensor positioned to inspect the part supported by the robot mechanism;controlling movement of the robot mechanism relative to the sensor, wherein the controlling is done by a feedback control unit which receives the sensor input, and the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input, further comprising at least one filter positioned along a line of sight from the sensor to the part, and further comprising the step of operating the filter based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 11. An inspection system for robotic inspection of a part, comprising: a robot mechanism configured to support the part, the robot mechanism being moveable to adjust position and pose of the part;a sensor positioned to obtain part-related sensor input of the part supported by the robot mechanism; anda feedback control unit in communication with the sensor to receive the part-related sensor input, the feedback control unit being configured to control movement of the robot mechanism based on the part-related sensor input, wherein the sensor further comprises a plurality of lenses and an automated lens changing system for positioning a lens of said plurality of lenses along a line of sight from the sensor to the part, and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to change the lens along the line of sight based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, further comprising a storage in communication with at least one of the sensor and the feedback control unit, the storage being configured to receive and store the part-related sensor input or information derived therefrom.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the feedback control unit is further configured to plan a path of movement, relative to the sensor, of the part supported by the robot mechanism, wherein the path of movement is determined based upon past sensor input.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the sensor has a controllable lens and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to control the lens based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, further comprising an illumination mechanism for illuminating the part, and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to control the illumination mechanism based on the part-related sensor input.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, further comprising at least one filter positioned along a line of sight from the illumination mechanism to the part, and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to operate the filter based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the illumination mechanism further comprises a controllable lens, and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to control the lens based upon the part-related sensor input.
  • 18. The system of claim 11, wherein the feedback control unit is configured to control the robot mechanism based upon the sensor input and manual input.
  • 19. An inspection system for robotic inspection of a part, comprising: a robot mechanism configured to support the part, the robot mechanism being moveable to adjust position and pose of the part;a sensor positioned to obtain part-related sensor input of the part supported by the robot mechanism; anda feedback control unit in communication with the sensor to receive the part-related sensor input, the feedback control unit being configured to control movement of the robot mechanism based on the part-related sensor input, further comprising at least one filter positioned along a line of sight from the sensor to the part, and wherein the feedback control unit is configured to operate the filter based upon the part-related sensor input.
US Referenced Citations (214)
Number Name Date Kind
3804397 Neumann Apr 1974 A
4402053 Kelley et al. Aug 1983 A
4403294 Hamada et al. Sep 1983 A
4873651 Raviv Oct 1989 A
5064291 Reiser Nov 1991 A
5119678 Bashyam et al. Jun 1992 A
5345514 Mandavieh et al. Sep 1994 A
5345515 Nishi et al. Sep 1994 A
5351078 Lemelson Sep 1994 A
5963328 Yoshida et al. Oct 1999 A
6023637 Liu et al. Feb 2000 A
6153889 Jones Nov 2000 A
6177682 Bartulovic et al. Jan 2001 B1
6271520 Tao et al. Aug 2001 B1
6399948 Thomas Jun 2002 B1
6434267 Smith Aug 2002 B1
6462813 Haven et al. Oct 2002 B1
6690016 Watkins et al. Feb 2004 B1
6737648 Fedder et al. May 2004 B2
6759659 Thomas et al. Jul 2004 B2
6804622 Bunker et al. Oct 2004 B2
6907358 Suh et al. Jun 2005 B2
6965120 Beyerer et al. Oct 2005 B1
7026811 Roney, Jr. et al. Apr 2006 B2
7064330 Raulerson et al. Jun 2006 B2
7119338 Thompson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7122801 Favro et al. Oct 2006 B2
7129492 Saito et al. Oct 2006 B2
7164146 Weir et al. Jan 2007 B2
7190162 Tenley et al. Mar 2007 B2
7220966 Saito et al. May 2007 B2
7233867 Pisupati et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240556 Georgeson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7272529 Hogan et al. Sep 2007 B2
7313961 Tenley et al. Jan 2008 B2
7415882 Fetzer et al. Aug 2008 B2
7446886 Aufmuth et al. Nov 2008 B2
7489811 Brummel et al. Feb 2009 B2
7602963 Nightingale et al. Oct 2009 B2
7689030 Suh et al. Mar 2010 B2
7724925 Shepard May 2010 B2
7738725 Raskar et al. Jun 2010 B2
7823451 Sarr Nov 2010 B2
7966883 Lorraine et al. Jun 2011 B2
8050491 Vaidyanathan Nov 2011 B2
8204294 Alloo et al. Jun 2012 B2
8208711 Venkatachalam et al. Jun 2012 B2
8221825 Reitz et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239424 Haigh et al. Aug 2012 B2
8431917 Wang et al. Apr 2013 B2
8449176 Shepard May 2013 B2
8520931 Tateno Aug 2013 B2
8528317 Gerez et al. Sep 2013 B2
8692887 Ringermacher et al. Apr 2014 B2
8744166 Scheid et al. Jun 2014 B2
8761490 Scheid et al. Jun 2014 B2
8781209 Scheid et al. Jul 2014 B2
8781210 Scheid et al. Jul 2014 B2
8792705 Scheid et al. Jul 2014 B2
8913825 Taguchi et al. Dec 2014 B2
8983794 Motzer et al. Mar 2015 B1
9037381 Care May 2015 B2
9046497 Kush Jun 2015 B2
9066028 Koshti Jun 2015 B1
9080453 Shepard et al. Jul 2015 B2
9116071 Hatcher, Jr. et al. Aug 2015 B2
9134280 Cataldo et al. Sep 2015 B2
9146205 Renshaw et al. Sep 2015 B2
9151698 Jahnke et al. Oct 2015 B2
9154743 Hatcher, Jr. et al. Oct 2015 B2
9240049 Ciurea et al. Jan 2016 B2
9251582 Lim et al. Feb 2016 B2
9300865 Wang et al. Mar 2016 B2
9305345 Lim Apr 2016 B2
9458735 Diwinsky et al. Oct 2016 B1
9465385 Kamioka et al. Oct 2016 B2
9467628 Geng et al. Oct 2016 B2
9471057 Scheid et al. Oct 2016 B2
9476798 Pandey et al. Oct 2016 B2
9476842 Drescher et al. Oct 2016 B2
9483820 Lim et al. Nov 2016 B2
9488592 Maresca et al. Nov 2016 B1
9519844 Thompson et al. Dec 2016 B1
9594059 Brady et al. Mar 2017 B1
9734568 Vajaria et al. May 2017 B2
9785919 Diwinsky et al. Oct 2017 B2
9804997 Sharp et al. Oct 2017 B2
9808933 Lin et al. Nov 2017 B2
9981382 Strauss May 2018 B1
10438036 Reome et al. Oct 2019 B1
20020121602 Thomas et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020167660 Zaslavsky Nov 2002 A1
20030117395 Yoon Jun 2003 A1
20030205671 Thomas et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040089811 Lewis et al. May 2004 A1
20040089812 Favro et al. May 2004 A1
20040139805 Antonelli et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040201672 Varadarajan et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040240600 Freyer et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040245469 Favro et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040247170 Furze et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050008215 Shepard Jan 2005 A1
20050113060 Lowery May 2005 A1
20050151083 Favro et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050167596 Rothenfusser et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050276907 Harris et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060012790 Furze et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060078193 Brummel Apr 2006 A1
20060086912 Weir et al. Apr 2006 A1
20070007733 Hogarth et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070017297 Georgeson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070045544 Favro et al. Mar 2007 A1
20080022775 Sathish et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080053234 Staroselsky et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080111074 Weir et al. May 2008 A1
20080183402 Malkin et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080229834 Bossi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080247635 Davis et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247636 Davis et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090000382 Sathish et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090010507 Geng Jan 2009 A1
20090066939 Venkatachalam et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090128643 Kondo et al. May 2009 A1
20090252987 Greene, Jr. Oct 2009 A1
20090279772 Sun et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090312956 Zombo et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100212430 Murai et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100220910 Kaucic et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110062339 Ruhge et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110083705 Stone et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110119020 Key May 2011 A1
20110123093 Alloo et al. May 2011 A1
20110299752 Sun Dec 2011 A1
20110302694 Wang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120154599 Huang Jun 2012 A1
20120188380 Drescher et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120249959 You et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120275667 Lu Nov 2012 A1
20120293647 Singh et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130028478 St-Pierre et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130041614 Shepard et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130070897 Jacotin Mar 2013 A1
20130113914 Scheid et al. May 2013 A1
20130113916 Scheid et al. May 2013 A1
20130163849 Jahnke et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130235897 Bouteyre et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130250067 Laxhuber Sep 2013 A1
20140022357 Yu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140056507 Doyle et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140098836 Bird Apr 2014 A1
20140184786 Georgeson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140185912 Lim et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140198185 Haugen et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140200832 Troy et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140350338 Tanaka et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150041654 Barychev et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150046098 Jack et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150086083 Chaudhry et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150128709 Stewart et al. May 2015 A1
20150138342 Brdar et al. May 2015 A1
20150185128 Chang et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150233714 Kim Aug 2015 A1
20150253266 Lucon et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150314901 Murray et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160012588 Taguchi et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160043008 Murray et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160109283 Broussais-Colella et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160178532 Lim et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160241793 Ravirala et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160284098 Okumura et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160314571 Finn et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160328835 Maresca, Jr. et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160334284 Kaplun Mucharrafille et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170011503 Newman Jan 2017 A1
20170023505 Maione et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170052152 Tat et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170085760 Ernst et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170090458 Lim Mar 2017 A1
20170122123 Kell et al. May 2017 A1
20170142302 Shaw et al. May 2017 A1
20170184469 Chang et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170184549 Reed et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170184650 Chang et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170211408 Ahmadian et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170219815 Letter et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170221274 Chen et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170234837 Hall et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170241286 Roberts et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170258391 Finn et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262965 Xiong et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262977 Finn et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262979 Xiong et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262985 Finn et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170262986 Xiong et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170270651 Bailey et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170297095 Zalameda et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170284971 Hall Nov 2017 A1
20180002039 Finn et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180005362 Wang et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180013959 Slavens et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180019097 Harada et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180098000 Park et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180111239 Zak et al. Apr 2018 A1
20190299542 Webb Oct 2019 A1
20190338666 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339131 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339165 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339206 Xiong et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339207 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339234 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190339235 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190340742 Finn et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190340805 Xiong et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190342499 Xiong et al. Nov 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
2820732 Dec 2014 CA
19710743 Sep 1998 DE
1961919 Aug 2008 EP
2545271 Jun 2017 GB
06235700 Aug 1994 JP
06235700 Aug 1994 JP
2015161247 Sep 2015 JP
191452 Jul 2013 SG
2013088709 Jun 2013 WO
2016112018 Jul 2016 WO
2016123508 Aug 2016 WO
2016176524 Nov 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (44)
Entry
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2020 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194.
E. J. Candes, X. Li, Y. Ma, and J. Wright, “Robust Principal Component Analysis”, submitted. http://www-stat.stanford.edu/˜candes/papers/RobustPCA.pdf.
M. Sznaier, O. Camps, N. Ozay, T. Ding, G. Tadmor and D. Brooks, “The Role of Dynamics in Extracting Information Sparsely Encoded in High Dimensional Data Streams”, in Dynamics of Information Systems, Hirsch, M.J.; Pardalos, P.M.; Murphey, R. (Eds.), pp. 1-28, Springer Verlag, 2010.
M. Fazel, H. Hindi, and S. Boyd, “A Rank Minimization Heuristic with Application to Minimum Order System Approximation”, American Control Conference, Arlington, Virginia, pp. 4734-4739, Jun. 2001.
Meola et al., ‘An Excursus on Infrared Thermography Imaging’, J. Imaging 2016, 2, 36 http://www.mdpi.com/2313-433X/2/4/36/pdf.
Yu et al., ‘ASIFT: An Algorithm for Fully Affine Invariant Comparison’, Image Processing on Line on Feb. 24, 2011. http://www.ipol.im/pub/art/2011/my-asift/article.pdf.
Schemmel et al., ‘Measurement of Direct Strain Optic Coefficient of YSZ Thermal Barrier Coatings at Ghz Frequencies’, Optics Express, v.25, n. 17, Aug. 21, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.019968.
Jean-Yves Bouguet, “Camera Calibration Toolbox for Matlab”, http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/, accessed on Nov. 10, 2017.
https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/91976-from-human-to-machine-how-to-be-prepared-for-integration-of-automated-visual-inspection.
http://www.yxlon.com/products/x-ray-and-ct-inspection-systems/yxlon-mu56-tb.
Yu et al. ‘Shadow Graphs and 3D Texture Reconstruction’, IJCV, vol. 62, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 35-60.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,242.
Gao et al., ‘A Statistical Method for Crack Detection from Vibrothermography Inspection Data’,(2010) Statistics Preprints. Paper 68. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/68.
Li1 Ming; Holland1 Stephen D.; and Meeker1 William Q.1 “Statistical Methods for Automatic Crack Detection Based on Vibrothermography Sequence-of-Images Data” (2010). Statistics Preprints. 69.
Henneke et al. ‘Detection of Damage in Composite Materials by Vibrothermography’, ASTM special technical publication (696), American Society for Testing and Materials, 1979, pp. 83-95.
http://www.npl.co.uk/commercial-services/sector-case-studies/thermal-imaging-reveals-the-invisible; Apr. 17, 2012.
Tian et al., ‘A Statistical Framework for Improved Automatic Flaw Detection in Nondestructive Evaluation Images’, Technometrics, 59, 247-261. Feb. 1, 2017.
Emmanuel J. Cand'es1,2, Xiaodong Li2, Yi Ma3,4, and John Wright4, “Robust Principal Component Analysis”, (1)Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; (2)Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; (3, 4) Electrical and Computer Engineering, UIUC, Urbana, IL (4) Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China, Dec. 17, 2009.
Sebastien Parent; “From Human to Machine: How to Be Prepared for Integration of Automated Visual Inspection” Quality Magazine, https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/91976. Jul. 2, 2014.
http://www.yxlon.com/products/x-ray-and-ct-inspection-systems/yxlon-mu56-tb, 2016.
U.S. Office action dated Jul. 23, 2018 issued in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,254.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,227.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated May 28, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/970,985.
Blachnio et al, “Assessment of Technical Condition Demonstrated by Gas Turbine Blades by Processing of Images of Their Surfaces”, Journal of KONBiN, 1(21), 2012, pp. 41-50.
Raskar et al., ‘A Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-flash Imaging’ ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2004 http://www.merl.com/publications/docs/TR2006-107.pdf.
Feris et al., ‘Specular Reflection Reduction with Multi-Flash Imaging’, 17th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 2004. http://rogerioferis.com/publications/FerisSIB04.pdf.
Holland, “First Measurements from a New Broadband Vibrothermography Measurement System”, AIP Conference Proceedings, 894 (2007), pp. 478-483. http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.2718010 \.
Gao et al., ‘Detecting Cracks in Aircraft Engine Fan Blades Using Vibrothermography Nondestructive Evaluation’, RESS Special Issue on Accelerated Testing, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.05.009.
Gao et al., ‘A Statistical Method for Crack Detection from Vibrothermography Inspection Data’, Statistics Preprints. Paper 68. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/68.
Holland, ‘Thermographic Signal Reconstruction for Vibrothermography’, Infrared Physics & Technology 54 (2011) 503-511.
Li et al., ‘Statistical Methods for Automatic Crack Detection Based on Vibrothermography Sequence-of-Images Data’, Statistics Preprints. Paper 69. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/stat_las_preprints/69.
Tian et al., ‘A Statistical Framework for Improved Automatic Flaw Detection in Nondestructive Evaluation Images’, Technometrics, 59, 247-261.
Henneke et al. ‘Detection of Damage in Composite Materials by Vibrothermography’, ASTM special technical publication (696), 1979, pp. 83-95.
http://www.npl.co.uk/commercial-services/sector-case-studies/thermal-imaging-reveals-the-invisible.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2020 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/970,944.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,214.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated May 21, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,236.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,194.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,205.
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 19, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,270.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2019 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/971,254.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190340721 A1 Nov 2019 US