Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to telephony, and more particularly to a method and system for detecting each time a party is added to a previously recorded or live telephone call.
Background Art
There is a general need for systems that detect three way calls. Many types of systems exist that detect three way calls by measuring certain line characteristics such as voltage fluctuations, noise and other electromechanical characteristics.
The purpose of many conventional three way call detection systems is to automatically disconnect art existing telephone connection whenever a three way call is detected. For example, correctional facilities such as jails and prisons routinely monitor or record telephone conversations of inmates. Inmates in general are prohibited from making three way telephone calls because these calls have been found to be made in order to, for instance, inappropriately contact witnesses or to call individuals that they would otherwise be prohibited from calling, such as convicted felons, drug dealers and gang members.
Although most correctional facilities record all telephone calls made by inmates, it is believed that on average only a very small proportion is ever monitored by correctional officers. Many correctional facilities record 2,000 inmate telephone calls a day, so monitoring all telephone calls or even a large fraction on a regular basis would require too much personnel and would be cost prohibitive. Inmates are aware of this and know that there is little chance of getting caught making a three way call. Thus, many make three way calls on a routine basis without being detected.
It is desirable in some instances to allow the completion of three way calls for intelligence gathering purposes because such calls often contain evidence of wrongdoing, such as terrorist or criminal activity, or other valuable information. Simply disconnecting an inmate as soon as a three way call is detected could result in the loss of potentially valuable information in those cases where an inmate is suspected of using telephones to engage in illegal or improper activity.
It is therefore desirable to be able to search for and retrieve telephone calls that involved three way conversations in order to determine whether illegal activities were discussed.
It is also desirable to be able to go directly to the point in the conversation where the three way call took place without having to listen to the entire conversation.
The present invention provides a method and system for the detection, retrieval and playback of three way telephone calls based upon an analysis of the characteristics and patterns of the content of the telephone conversation. The invention is designed to provide an efficient means for organizations such as correctional facilities to identify and monitor the contents of three way conversations. The present invention leverages the discovery that three way conversations share a number of characteristics that can readily be detected, measured, analyzed, and input into computer algorithms which can then reliably determine whether a three way call was placed during a particular telephone conversation.
Disclosed herein is a system for detecting three-way calls in a monitored telephone conversation. The system includes a speech recognition processor that transcribes the monitored telephone conversation and associates at least one characteristic of the monitored telephone conversation with a transcript of the monitored telephone conversation. A database stores at least the transcript of the monitored telephone conversation and the at least one characteristic associated therewith. In some embodiments of the invention, the database also stores a recording of the monitored telephone conversation. A three-way call detection processor analyzes the at least one characteristic associated with the monitored telephone conversation to detect the addition of one or more third parties to the monitored telephone conversation.
The system preferably includes at least one domain-specific language model, such as a language model specific to inmate telephony, that the speech recognition processor utilizes to transcribe the monitored telephone conversation. The system may include multiple domain-specific language models trained for a plurality of ethnic groups, dialects, foreign languages, or other variations in speech and language patterns. Where foreign languages are involved, an optional translation processor may be utilized to translate the monitored telephone conversation or the transcript thereof.
In some embodiments of the invention, transcription and extraction of characteristics occurs in real-time (that is, while the monitored telephone conversation is in progress). Alternatively, the telephone conversations may be recorded and processed at a later time.
At least some of the characteristics extracted from the monitored telephone conversation are indicative of the addition of a third-party to the conversation, and thus of the establishment of a three-way call. For example, gaps in conversation, dial tones, dial pulses, ring tones, telephone salutations (“hello”), and other verbal and non-verbal cues or patterns may indicate that a third party has joined the conversation. The three-way call detection processor may detect these characteristics using any of a number of call-processing algorithmic, including, without limitation: algorithms that measure the frequency of phrases uttered during the conversation; algorithms that measure the timing of phrases uttered during the conversation; algorithms that extract entities from phrases uttered during the conversation; pattern detection algorithms that compare timings of utterances within the conversation with timings of the at least one characteristic associated therewith; and any combinations thereof.
Based upon the characteristics and patterns of the monitored telephone conversation a score may be assigned that is indicative of a likelihood that at least one third party was added to the monitored telephone conversation.
The present invention also provides a method of detecting three-way calls in a monitored telephone conversation. The method includes: transcribing the monitored telephone conversation; extracting a plurality of characteristics of the monitored telephone conversation; associating the extracted plurality of characteristics with a transcript of the monitored telephone conversation; utilizing a scoring algorithm to assign a score to the monitored telephone conversation based on the extracted plurality of characteristics, wherein the score is indicative of a likelihood that at least one third party was added to the monitored telephone conversation; and generating information regarding addition of a third party to the monitored telephone conversation. The scoring algorithm typically utilizes a scoring function, such as a logistic function or a threshold function, to calculate the score, but may also utilize an artificial neural network.
The information generated by the method may include tagging the transcript to identify portions thereof that are pertinent to the addition of the third party. In other embodiments of the invention, the information generated includes timestamps or word or character locations at which the three-way call likely begins. Of course, the transcript may also be associated with a sound recording of the monitored telephone conversation.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of detecting three-way calls in a monitored telephone conversation, includes the following steps: transcribing the monitored telephone conversation; extracting ability of characteristics of the monitored telephone conversation, wherein the plurality of characteristics extracted are indicators of a third party being added to the monitored telephone conversation; calculating a score for the monitored telephone conversation based upon at least two of the plurality of characteristics extracted front the monitored telephone conversation, wherein the score is indicative of a likelihood that at least one third party was added to the monitored telephone conversation; and generating information regarding addition of a third party to the monitored telephone conversation. Preferably, at least three of the plurality of characteristics, and more preferably at least four of the plurality of characteristics, will be used to calculate the score for the monitored telephone conversation.
Also disclosed herein is a query and retrieval system for monitored telephone conversations. The query and retrieval system includes a database of monitored telephone conversations including a plurality of call records. At least some of the call records include a recording of the monitored telephone conversation, a transcript of the monitored telephone conversation, and a score assigned to the monitored telephone conversation. The score reflects a likelihood or probability that the monitored telephone conversation included one or more three-way calls, and is based upon one or more characteristics or patterns of the monitored telephone conversation indicative of adding a third party thereto. The system also includes a query interface that accepts user input of search criteria, including at least a score criterion; a processor that retrieves one or more call records from the database based upon the search criteria; a selection interface that permits user selection of a call record from the retrieved one or more call records; and an output device that provides synchronized playback and visualization, respectively, of the recording and transcript included in the selected call record. The output device optionally provides a visual identification of the one or more characteristics of the monitored telephone conversation indicative of adding a third party thereto. In some embodiments of the invention, the system further includes an interface that permits direct navigation to one or more three-way calls within the monitored telephone conversation.
An advantage of the present invention is that it operates independently of any particular type of telephone system, such as VOIP or POTS.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it is not necessary to Modify existing•telephone equipment or add hardware devices.
Still another advantage of the present invention is that it can detect three way calls more accurately than previous methods.
Yet another advantage of the present invention is that it can provide detailed information as to the nature and content of the three way call.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it permits one to “jump” directly to the point in the conversation where the three-way call likely occurred.
Still another advantage is that the present system permits the review of a large number of recorded phone calls using only a small number of personnel.
A further advantage of the present invention is that it permits the collection of intelligence information to help uncover inappropriate activities, such as acts of terrorism.
The foregoing and other aspects, features, details, utilities, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from reading the following description and claims, and from reviewing the accompanying drawings.
The following description illustrates the invention with reference to a real world domain, and in particular with respect to correctional facilities. However, it should be understood that the practice of the invention is not limited to any particular domain or application. Rather, it is intended to be more generally applicable to any domain where there is a need for three way call detection by examining the contents and call characteristics of recorded or live telephone conversations.
Unlike traditional three-way call detection systems, the primary purpose of which is to terminate a telephone conversation upon establishment of a three-way call, the present invention identifies the three-way call and allows the call to proceed. A user of the system, such as a corrections officer or investigator, may then search for monitored calls during which at least one three-way call took place, retrieve such a call, and proceed directly to the point where a third party was added, for example to gather intelligence or evidence of inappropriate conduct.
The following is a portrayal of one example of a typical sequence of events that might occur when an inmate or similar person makes a three way call:
1. The inmate first places a call to a telephone number that is not blocked or otherwise restricted by the correctional facility. The recipient of the call answers the phone.
2. At some point during the telephone conversation, the inmate asks the recipient to place a three may call. When making this request, the inmate might dictate a telephone number or mention the name or organization of the third party to call.
3. The recipient then might put the inmate on hold while the call is being made. Alternatively, the recipient might use a separate phone (e.g., a separate cell phone) to place the three way call. Certain call characteristics suggestive of a three-way call, such as a gap in speech or a series of dial tones or pulses, may be observed, and may possibly be followed by a ring tone.
4. The third party answers the phone and commences conversing with the inmate. The third party will typically answer with a phrase commonly used when answering the telephone such as “hello,” “hi,” or another salutation or greeting, or stating the name of a person or organization. At this point a speaker recognition (or speaker turn) component of the speech recognition system may detect that a third and previously undetected speaker has been added to the call. It is important to rote that the addition of a third and previously undetected speaker in the conversation by itself is not dispositive of a three way call. It could simply be another member of the household of the original recipient of the call.
5. After a while the inmate or three way call recipient decides to terminate the three way call. At this point the inmate may do one of three things: terminate the original call, continue to converse with the original receipt make another three way call.
6. if another three the same way call is made, the same or similar sequence of events from (1) through (5) applies.
The present invention focuses on an analyzes the three way call characteristics described above (e.g., verbal and non-verbal cues, such as telephone numbers, names of people or organization to call, salutations, dial tones, dial pulses, ring tones, gaps in conversation, speaker turns/recognition of new speakers, and other three way call characteristics). A speed recognition processor, in combination with a plurality of other algorithms and processors, searches the monitored call for clues that would indicate the addition of one or more third parties to a telephone conversation, while a three-way call detection processor evaluates the clues to determine a probability that the call included at least one three-way call.
In
In some embodiments of the invention, it is contemplated that multiple domain-specific language models may be used, which may be trained for a plurality of ethnic groups, a plurality of regional dialects, or other language differences. Using multiple domain-specific language models has been shown to significantly improve speech recognition and transcription accuracy. It is also contemplated that, in instances where foreign languages are spoken, multiple domain specific language models trained for a plurality of foreign languages may be used. Further, a translation processor may be utilized to translate the transcript of the monitored telephone conversation from a first language to a second language (e.g., to translate a conversation in Spanish into English).
In addition to converting spoken audio to text, the speech recognition process extracts a number of verbal and nonverbal characteristics from the telephone conversation. These include, but are not limited to, speaker turns (e.g., as determined by voice-recognition of the speakers in the telephone conversation): gaps in audio; dial, pulse, and ring tones; verbal cues (e.g., mentions of telephone numbers, mentions of people or organizations to call, or telephone salutations such as “hello”); speech and phraseology patterns; and tinting information that includes the beginning and end times (e.g., as measured in either seconds or milliseconds front the beginning of the telephone conversation) of utterances, audio gaps, dial pulse and ring tones, and speaker turns. The characteristics are preferably associated with the transcript of the monitored telephone conversation.
Once the speech recognition process has completed processing the telephone conversation, it outputs the results to a file. One suitable format for the output file is an XML file 112. The output file is then processed by an output processor 110 that extracts each component from the XML file and inserts it as a call record into a multimedia database 114, for example as a binary large object (BLOB). That is, as illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
The call processing algorithms seek characteristics or patterns indicative of a three-way call. If any characteristics or patterns indicative of a three-way call are identified at a particular point in the telephone conversation, the call processing algorithms may output a matrix of the identified characteristics and/or patterns, along with timing information and a weighting structure that weights each pattern and characteristic with respect to its relative importance as a characteristic, or pattern indicative of a three-way call. For example, a nap in the conversation may have a lower weight than an utterance of a telephone number followed by a gap in the conversation, which may have a lower weight than an utterance of a telephone number followed by a gap in the conversation in which dial tones are detected, which may have a lower weight than an utterance of a telephone number followed by a gap in the conversation in which dial tones are detected and after which a new speaker is identified by the speech recognition processor. The output matrix is then forwarded to the scoring algorithm 208. If no three way call characteristics are identified, control is returned to the call retrieval process, which then retrieves the next unprocessed telephone conversation from the multimedia database.
The scoring algorithm 208 then computes a score based on the output matrix of the extracted call characteristics and patterns. The score is indicative of a likelihood or probability that at least one third party was added to the monitored telephone conversation. In some embodiments of the invention, the score is computed as follows:
where S is the interim score, n is the number of characteristics and patterns in the output matrix of the call processing algorithms 210, wi is the weight of the ith characteristic or pattern in the matrix, and xi is the ith characteristic or pattern in the matrix. Note that xi can be represented by binary, integer, or continuous values. In other embodiments of the invention, the scoring algorithm may calculate the value of S using an associative artificial neural network, such as an associative network, for example Kohonen networks.
The interim score S may optionally be further refined by the use of a logistic function to produce values of between zero and one as follows:
where SF is the final score. A graphical representation of the two scoring equations outlined above is illustrated in
Referring once again to
Upon successful detection of a three way call, information regarding the addition of a third party to the telephone conversation may be generated. For example, the tagging process 206 may tag the telephone conversation being processed as including at least one three-way call, and may also tag each phrase, pattern, or point in the transcript that is pertinent to a three way call. The tags may then be added to the multimedia database 114 as part of the call record along with the final score for the telephone conversation output by the scoring algorithm.
The tagging process 206 then passes control to the synchronization process 204. The synchronization process identifies the likely beginning of the detected three way call and updates the call record produced by the tagging process 206 with information regarding the likely beginning of the detected three-way call. For example, the synchronization process 204 may add a time stamp or other timing information that identifies the number of seconds from the beginning of the call at which the three-way call took place. The synchronization process 204 may also add information about how many words or characters into the transcript the three way call occurred. The multimedia database 114 may also be updated to include at least one index of detected three-way calls and the characteristics associated with those calls.
If the end of the call has been reached, control is returned to the call retrieval process. Otherwise, control is returned to the call processing algorithms.
The output device further preferably provides a visual identification of the one or more characteristics of the monitored telephone conversation that are indicative of the establishment of a three-way call. For example, the transcript in panel 504 may be highlighted or otherwise flagged at the point where the three-way call was established or throughout the three-way call (e.g., the entire portion of the transcript covering the three-way call may be bold faced). Similarly, the panel 508 may show a time stamp 510 of when in the call the three-way call was established, and, optionally, when it was terminated. In some embodiments of the invention, the time stamp 510 may be used to navigate directly (or “jump”) to the point in the conversation where the three-way call took place, thereby advantageously permitting law enforcement officials to review only the portion of the conversation that is of particular interest.
Although only a few illustrative embodiments of this invention have been described above with a certain degree of particularity, those skilled in the art could make numerous alterations to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of this invention. It is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative only and not limiting. Changes in detail or structure may be made without departing front the spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/971,292, filed Aug. 20, 2013, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/706,431, filed Feb. 15, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,802, which are incorporated herein by reference in then entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4054756 | Comella et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4191860 | Weber | Mar 1980 | A |
4670628 | Boratgis et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4691347 | Stanley et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4737982 | Boratgis et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4813070 | Humphreys et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4907221 | Pariani et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4918719 | Daudelin | Apr 1990 | A |
4935956 | Hellwarth et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4943973 | Werner | Jul 1990 | A |
4995030 | Helf | Feb 1991 | A |
5229764 | Matchett et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5291548 | Tsumura et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5319702 | Kitchin et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319735 | Preuss et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5345595 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5379345 | Greenberg | Jan 1995 | A |
5425091 | Josephs | Jun 1995 | A |
5438616 | Peoples | Aug 1995 | A |
5502762 | Andrew et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5535194 | Ashley et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5535261 | Brown et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539731 | Haneda et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539812 | Kitchin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555551 | Rudokas et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5583925 | Bernstein | Dec 1996 | A |
5590171 | Howe | Dec 1996 | A |
5592548 | Sih | Jan 1997 | A |
5613004 | Cooperman | Mar 1997 | A |
5619561 | Reese | Apr 1997 | A |
5623539 | Bassenyemukasa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5634086 | Rtischev et al. | May 1997 | A |
5636292 | Rhoads | Jun 1997 | A |
5640490 | Hansen et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646940 | Hotto | Jul 1997 | A |
5649060 | Ellozy et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655013 | Gainsboro | Aug 1997 | A |
5675704 | Juang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687236 | Moskowitz | Nov 1997 | A |
5710834 | Rhoads | Jan 1998 | A |
5719937 | Warren et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5745558 | Richardson, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745569 | Moskowitz | Apr 1998 | A |
5745604 | Rhoads | Apr 1998 | A |
5748726 | Unno | May 1998 | A |
5748763 | Rhoads | May 1998 | A |
5748783 | Rhoads | May 1998 | A |
5757889 | Ohtake | May 1998 | A |
5768355 | Salibrici | Jun 1998 | A |
5768426 | Rhoads | Jun 1998 | A |
5774452 | Wolosewicz | Jun 1998 | A |
5796811 | McFarlen | Aug 1998 | A |
5805685 | McFarlen | Sep 1998 | A |
5809462 | Nussbaum | Sep 1998 | A |
5822432 | Moskowitz | Oct 1998 | A |
5822436 | Rhoads | Oct 1998 | A |
5832119 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5835486 | Davis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841886 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5841978 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5850481 | Rhoads | Dec 1998 | A |
5862260 | Rhoads | Jan 1999 | A |
5867562 | Scherer | Feb 1999 | A |
5883945 | Richardson, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889868 | Moskowitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899972 | Miyazawa et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907602 | Peel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920834 | Sih et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926533 | Gainsboro | Jul 1999 | A |
5930369 | Cox et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930377 | Powell et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5953049 | Horn et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960080 | Fahlman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963909 | Warren et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982891 | Ginter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999828 | Sih et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011849 | Orrin | Jan 2000 | A |
6026193 | Rhoads | Feb 2000 | A |
6035034 | Trump | Mar 2000 | A |
6052454 | Kek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052462 | Lu | Apr 2000 | A |
6064963 | Gainsboro | May 2000 | A |
6072860 | Kek et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078567 | Traill et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078645 | Cai et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078807 | Dunn et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111954 | Rhoads | Aug 2000 | A |
6122392 | Rhoads | Sep 2000 | A |
6122403 | Rhoads | Sep 2000 | A |
6138119 | Hall et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141406 | Johnson | Oct 2000 | A |
6160903 | Hamid et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185416 | Rudokas et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185683 | Ginter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205249 | Moskowitz | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219640 | Basu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233347 | Chen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237786 | Ginter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243480 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243676 | Witteman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253193 | Ginter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263507 | Ahmad et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266430 | Rhoads | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278772 | Bowater et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278781 | Rhoads | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289108 | Rhoads | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301360 | Bocionek et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312911 | Bancroft | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314192 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324573 | Rhoads | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324650 | Ogilvie | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330335 | Rhoads | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343138 | Rhoads | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343738 | Ogilvie | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345252 | Beigi et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6389293 | Clore et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421645 | Beigi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6526380 | Thelen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542602 | Elazar | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6625587 | Erten et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633846 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647096 | Milliorn et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665376 | Brown | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665644 | Kanevsky et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671292 | Haartsen | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6728682 | Fasciano | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6748356 | Beigi et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760697 | Neumeyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763099 | Blink | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6788772 | Barak et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6810480 | Parker et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6880171 | Ahmad et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6895086 | Martin | May 2005 | B2 |
6898612 | Parra et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6907387 | Reardon | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7035386 | Susen et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039585 | Wilmot et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050918 | Pupalaikis et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7079636 | McNitt et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7079637 | McNitt et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7103549 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106843 | Gainsboro et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7123704 | Martin | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133828 | Scarano et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149788 | Gundla et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7197560 | Caslin et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7248685 | Martin | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7256816 | Profanchik et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277468 | Tian et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7333798 | Hodge | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7417983 | He et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7494061 | Reinhold | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505406 | Spadaro | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7519169 | Hingoranee et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7529357 | Rae et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7596498 | Basu et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7639791 | Hodge | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7664243 | Martin | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7826604 | Martin | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848510 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853243 | Hodge | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7899167 | Rae | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7916845 | Rae | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7961860 | McFarlen | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8000269 | Rae | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8090082 | Gilbert | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8351581 | Mikan | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8542802 | Olligschlaeger | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8630726 | Hodge | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8731934 | Olligschlaeger | May 2014 | B2 |
8886663 | Gainsboro | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8929525 | Edwards | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8942356 | Olligschlaeger | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9143610 | Hodge | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20010056349 | St. John | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056461 | Kampe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002464 | Pertrushin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010587 | Pertrushin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032566 | Tzirkel-Hancock et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030023444 | St. John | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040326 | Levy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030086546 | Falcone et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040029564 | Hodge | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040249650 | Freedman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252184 | Hesse et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010411 | Rigazio et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050080625 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114192 | Tor et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125226 | Magee | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128283 | Bulriss et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144004 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182628 | Choi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060064037 | Shalon et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087554 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087555 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060198504 | Shemisa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200353 | Bennett | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060285650 | Hodge | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285665 | Wasserblat et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070047734 | Frost | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071206 | Gainsboro | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070185717 | Bennett | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237099 | He et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242658 | Rae et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244690 | Peters | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080000966 | Keiser | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021708 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046241 | Osburn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080106370 | Perez et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118045 | Polozola et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080195387 | Zigel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198978 | Olligschlaeger | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201143 | Olligschlaeger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201158 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080260133 | Hodge et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300878 | Bennett | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100177881 | Hodge | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202595 | Hodge et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110055256 | Phillips et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20170006159 | Olligschlaeger | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1280137 | Dec 2004 | EP |
075313 | Nov 1981 | GB |
59225626 | Dec 1984 | JP |
60010821 | Jan 1985 | JP |
61135239 | Jun 1986 | JP |
3065826 | Mar 1991 | JP |
PCTUS9514230 | Nov 1995 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bender, W., et al., “Techniques for Data Hiding,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 35, Nos. 3&4, 1996. |
Boney, L., et al., “Digital Watermarks for Audio Signals” Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Computing Systems, p. 473-480, IEEE Computer Society Press, United States (1996). |
Boney, L., et al., “Digital Watermarks for Audio Signals” Proceedings of EUSIPC0-96, Eighth European Signal processing Conference, Trieste, Italy, 10-13 (1996). |
Cox, I. J., et al.; “Secure Spread Spectrum Watermarking for Multimedia,” NEC Research Institute, Technical Report 95-10. |
Olligschlaeger, A. M., “Criminal Intelligence Databases and Applications”, in Marilyn B. Peterson, Bob Morehouse, and Richard Wright, Intelligence 2000: Revising the Basic Elements—A Guide for Intelligence Professionals, 2000, a joint publication of IALEIA and LEIU, United States. |
Tirkel, A., et al.; “Image Watermarking—A Spread Spectrum Application”. |
Coherent Announces Industry's First Remote Management System for Echo Canceller, Business Wire, Mar. 3, 1997. |
Newton's Telecom Dictionary, 18th Edition, Feb. 2002, p. 168, section “coding theory”. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application No. EP 04 80 9530, Munich, Germany, completed on Mar. 25, 2009. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US04/025029, European Patent Office, Netherlands, mailed on Mar. 14, 2006. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 1, 2011, in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,534,767, DSI-ITI, LLC, filed Aug. 4, 2004. |
Final Office Action, mailed Jun. 1, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/819,834, filed Jun. 29, 2007, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action, mailed Sep. 22, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/819,834, filed Jun. 29, 2007, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action, mailed Nov. 28, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,200, filed Feb. 15, 2008, 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action, mailed May 3, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,200, filed Feb. 15, 2008, 27 pages. |
Audioconferencing options. (Teleconference Units, Conference Bridges and Service Bureaus) (includes related articles on speech processing and new conferencing technology), Frankel, Elana, Teleconnect, v. 14, n. 5, p. 131(3), May 1996. |
Digital on Call, Silberg, Lurie, HFN The Weekly Newspaper for the Home Furnishing Network, p. 97, Mar. 17, 1997. |
Immate Telephone Services: Large Business: Voice, Oct. 2, 2001. |
National Alliance of Gang Investigators Associations, 2005 National Gang Threat Assessment, 2005, pp. vi and 5-7, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. |
Statement for the Record of John S. Pistole, Assistant Director, Counterterrorism Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology, and Homeland Security, Oct. 14, 2003. |
Michael G. Christel, Andreas M. Olligschlaeger, and Chang Huang, “Interactive Maps for a Digital Video Library,” IEEE Special Edition on Multimedia Computing, Jan.-Mar. 2000, pp. 60-67, IEEE, United States. |
Ian R. Lane, Tatsuya Kawahara, and Tomoko Matsui, “Language Model Switching Based on Topic Detection for Dialog Speech Recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE-ICASSP, vol. 1, pp. 616-619, 2003, IEEE, United States. |
Andreas M. Olligschlaeger, “Criminal Intelligence Databases and Applications, in Marilyn B. Peterson, Bob Morehouse, and Richard Wright, Intelligence 2000: Revising the Basic Elements—A Guide for Intelligence Professionals,” 2000, a joint publication of IALEIA and LEIU, United States. |
Office of the Inspector General, Department of Justice, Criminal Calls: A Review of the Bureau of Prisons' Management of Inmate Telephone Privileges, Chapter 4, 1999, United States. |
National Major Gang Task Force, A Study of Gangs and Security Threat Groups in America's Adult Prisons and Jails, 2002, United States. |
“Cisco IAD2400 Series Business-Class Integrated Access Device”, Cisco Systems Datasheet, 2003. |
“SIP and IPLink™ in the Next Generation Network: An Overview,” Intel, 2001. |
“Voice Over Packet in Next Generation Networks: An Architectural Framework,” Bellcore, Special Report SR-4717, Issue 1, Jan. 1999. |
“Cool Edit Pro, Version 1.2 User Guide,” Syntrillium Software Corporation, 1998. |
“Criminal Calls: A Review of the Bureau of Prisons' Management of Inmate Telephone Privileges,” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Aug. 1999. |
“Global Call API for Linux and Windows Operation Systems,” Intel Dialogic Library Reference, Dec. 2005. (3 parts). |
“The NIST Year 2002 Speaker Recognition Evaluation Plan,” NIST, Feb. 27, 2002, accessible at http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/mig/tests/spk/2002/2002-spkrecevalplan-v60.pdf. |
Auckenthaler, et al., “Speaker-Centric Score Normalization and Time Pattern Analysis for Continuous Speaker Verification,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), vol. 2, Jun. 2000, pp. 1065-1068. |
Audacity Team, “About Audacity,” World Wide Web, 2014, accessible at http://wiki.audacity.team.org/wiki/About—Audacity. |
Beigi, et al., “A Hierarchical Approach to Large-Scale Speaker Recognition,” EuroSpeech 1999, Sep. 1999, vol. 5; pp. 2203-2206. |
Beigi, et al., “IBM Model-Based and Frame-By-Frame Speaker-Recognition,” Speaker Recognition and its Commercial and Forensic Applications, Apr. 1998; pp. 1-4. |
Beigi, H., “Challenges of Large-Scale Speaker Recognition,” 3rd European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research Conference, Nov. 4, 2005. |
Boersma, et al., “Praat: Doing Phonetics by computer,” World Wide Web, 2015, accessible at http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat. |
Bolton, et al., “Statistical Fraud Detection: A Review,” Statistical Science, vol. 17, No. 3 (2002), pp. 235-255. |
BubbleLINK® Software Architecture (Science Dynamics 2003). |
Bur Goode, Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP), Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 90, No. 9, 1495-1517 (Sep. 2002). |
Carey, et al., “User Validation for Mobile Telephones,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), vol. 2, Jun. 2000, pp. 1093-1096. |
Chaudhari, et al., “Transformation enhanced multi-grained modeling for text-independent speaker recognition,” International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 2000, pp. 298-301. |
Clavel, et al., “Events Detection for an Audio-Based Surveillance System,” IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME2005), Jul. 6-8, 2005, pp. 1306-1309. |
Clifford J. Weinstein, MIT, The Experimental Integrated Switched Network—A System-Level Network Test Facility (IEEE 1983). |
Commander Call System, Rev. 1.04 (Science Dynamics 2002). |
Final Office Action, mailed Jul. 16, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,292, filed Aug. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action, mailed Oct. 17, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,431, filed Feb. 15, 2007, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action, mailed Apr. 7, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,292, filed Aug. 20, 2013, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action, mailed Mar. 30, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,431, filed Feb. 15, 2007, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action, mailed Nov. 6, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,292, filed Aug. 20, 2013, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, mailed Feb. 4, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,431, filed Feb. 15, 2007, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, mailed May 21, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,431, filed Feb. 15, 2007, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, mailed Sep. 24, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,292, filed Aug. 20, 2013, 8 pages. |
Defendant's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:14-cv-0829-K (N.D. Tex.), filed Nov. 19, 2014. |
Defendant's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:14-cv-0829-K (N.D. Tex.), filed Dec. 10, 2014. |
Dunn, et al., “Approached to speaker detection and tracking in conversational speech,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 10, 2000; pp. 92-112. |
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 7,899,167, U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,532, filed Aug. 15, 2003. |
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,663, U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,450, filed Sep. 20, 2008. (2 parts). |
Furui, et al., “Experimental studies in a new automatic speaker verification system using telephone speech,” Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE International Conference on ICASSP '80, vol. 5, Apr. 1980, pp. 1060-1062. |
Furui, S., “50 Years of Progress in Speech and Speaker Recognition Research,” ECTI Transactions on Computer and Information Technology, vol. 1, No. 2, Nov. 2005, pp. 64-74. |
Hansen, et al., “Speaker recognition using phoneme-specific gmms,” The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, May-Jun. 2004. |
Isobe, et al., “A new cohort normalization using local acoustic information for speaker verification,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 2, Mar. 1999; pp. 841-844. |
Jeff Hewett and Lee Dryburgh, Signaling System No. 7 (SS7/C7): Protocol, Architecture, and Services (Networking Technology) at 85 (Cisco Press, Jun. 2005). |
Juang, et al., “Automatic Speech Recognition—A Brief History of the Technology Development,” Oct. 8, 2014. |
Kinnunen, et al., “Real-Time Speaker Identification and Verification,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 277-288. |
Maes, et al., “Conversational speech biometrics,” E-Commerce Agents, Marketplace Solutions, Security Issues, and Supply and Demand, Springer-Verlang, London, UK, 2001, pp. 166-179. |
Maes, et al., “Open SESAME! Speech, Password or Key to Secure Your Door?,” Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Jan. 1998; pp. 1-3. |
Matsui, et al., “Concatenated Phoneme Models for Text-Variable Speaker Recognition,” International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), vol. 2, Apr. 1993; pp. 391-394. |
Original Specifications as-filed Aug. 26, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/212,495 to Frost. |
Original Specification as-filed Jul. 22, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,423 to Shaffer. |
Osifchin, N., “A Telecommunications Buildings/Power Infrastructure in a New Era of Public Networking,” IEEE 2000. |
PacketCableTM 1.0 Architecture Framework Technical Report, PKT-TR-ARCH-V0 1-001201 (Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. 1999). |
Pages from http://www.corp.att.com/history, archived by web.archive.org on Nov. 4, 2013. |
Pelecanos, J. “Conversational biometrics,” in Biometric Consortium Meeting, Baltimore, MD, Sep. 2006, accessible at http://www.biometrics.org/bc2006/presentations/Thu—Sep—21/Session—I/Pelecanos—Conversational—Biometrics.pdf. |
Photocopy of “Bellcore Notes on the Networks (Formerly BOC Notes on the LEC Networks),” Bellcore, Special Report SR-2275, Issue 3, Dec. 1997. |
Pollack, et al., “On the identification of Speakers by Voice,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 26, No. 3, May 1954. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,258, filed Jun. 30, 2006. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 12/002,507, filed Dec. 17, 2007. |
Rey, R.F., ed., “Engineering and Operations in the Bell System,” 2nd Edition, AT&T Bell Laboratories: Murray Hill, NJ, 1983. |
Reynolds, D., “Automatic Speaker Recognition Using Gaussian Mixture Speaker Models,” The Lincoln Laboratory Journal, vol. 8, No. 2, 1995; pp. 173-192. |
Rosenberg, et al., “The Use of Cohort Normalized Scores for Speaker Verification,” Speech Research Department, AT&T Bell Laboratories, 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, Alberta, Canada, Oct. 12-16, 1992. |
Ross, et al., “Multimodal Biometrics: An Overview,” Proc. of 12th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Vienna, Austria, Sep. 2004, pp. 1221-1224. |
Science Dynamics, Inmate Telephone Control Systems, http://scidyn.com/fraudprev—main.htm (archived by web.archive.org on Jan. 12, 2001). |
Science Dynamics, SciDyn BubbleLINK, http://www.scidyn.com/products/bubble.html (archived by web.archive.org on Jun. 18, 2006). |
Science Dynamics, SciDyn Call Control Solutions: Commander II, http://www.scidyn.com/products/commander2.html (archived by web.archive.org on Jun. 18, 2006). |
Science Dynamics, SciDyn IP Gateways, http://scidyn.com/products/ipgateways.html (archived by web.archive.org on Aug. 15, 2001). |
Science Dynamics, Science Dynamics—IP Telephony, http://www.scidyn.com/iptelephony—maim.htm (archived by web.archive.org on Oct. 12, 2000). |
Shearme, et al., “An Experiment Concerning the Recognition of Voices,” Language and Speech, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul./Sep. 1959. |
Viswanathan, et al., “Multimedia Document Retrieval using Speech and Speaker Recognition,” International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Jun. 2000, vol. 2; pp. 1-24. |
Definitions of “suspicion” and “suspect”, American Heritage Dictionary, 4th Edition, New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2006; pp. 1743-1744. |
Excerpts from the Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 10/135,878, filed Apr. 29, 2002. |
Definition of “telephony”, McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 6th Edition (McGraw-Hill, 2003). |
Doddington, G., “Speaker Recognition based on Idiolectal Differences between Speakers,” Seventh European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Sep. 3-7, 2001; pp. 2521-2524. |
Navratil, et al., “A Speech Biometrics System with Multi-Grained Speaker Modeling,” Proceedings of KOVENS 2000; 5 pages. |
Navratil, et al., “Phonetic Speaker Recognition using Maximum-Likelihood Binary-Decision Tree Models,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 6-10, 2003; 4 pages. |
Zajic, et al., “A Cohort Methods for Score Normalization in Speaker Verification Systme, Acceleration of On-Line Cohort Methods,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference “Speech and Computer,” Oct. 15-18, 2007; 6 pages. |
Moattar, et al., “Speech Overlap Detection Using Spectral Features and its Application in Speech Indexing,” Second International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies, 2006; 5 pages. |
Beigi, H., “Decision Theory,” Fundamentals of Speaker Recognition, Chapter 9, Springer US, 2011; pp. 313-339. |
Definition of “constant”, The American Heritage College Dictionary, 4th Ed. (2002); p. 306. |
Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/265,510 mailed Nov. 15, 2016; 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150201083 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13971292 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14604388 | US | |
Parent | 11706431 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 13971292 | US |