Silicon has increasingly been used in optical applications. Currently such optical components as waveguides, beam splitters, detectors, lasers, and the like can all be formed in silicon. Forming such components from silicon enables small high frequency response, lower energy components as well as large scale manufacturing using semiconductor fabrication methods.
Recently, thin silicon oxide layers have been grown on silicon components to form antireflective coatings on silicon in order to achieve a desired light path. In order to function properly, antireflective coatings must have a thickness matched to the wavelength of light used in the optical system. Any variation in the thickness of the antireflective coating can introduce unwanted reflections, attenuation, and other irregularities. Inasmuch as the optical spectrum is from 400 to 700 nanometers, achieving a specified antireflective coating requires extremely accurate manufacturing processes.
Silicon is a face centered cubic (FCC) crystal structure having 100, 110, and 111 plans, and permutations thereof. In the presence of oxygen, oxide layers will grow on facets parallel to the 100 and 111 planes at different rates. Accordingly, two facets on the same substrate that are parallel to the 100 and 111 planes, respectively, will have oxide layers of different thicknesses after having been exposed to oxygen for the same period of time. As a result, the facets will not bear oxide layers suitable for suppressing reflection of light at the same wavelength.
For example,
The substrate 10 is exposed to an oxidizing environment such that an oxide layer 20 is grown on the silicon substrate 10 will have a thickness 22 on facets 12a-12c that is less than a thickness 24 on facets 16a, 16b due to the faster growth rate of the 111 plane 18. Oxide layers grown on the 110 plane may likewise have a thickness different than the thicknesses 22, 24.
In view of the foregoing it would be an advancement in the art to provide a system and method for growing uniform oxide layers over both the 100 and 111 planes. Such a system and method should be capable of use in large scale manufacturing of silicon optical components.
The present invention includes methods and systems for growing uniform oxide layers evenly over a silicon substrate. One method includes growing a first layer of oxide on first and second facets of the substrate, with the first facet having a faster oxide growth rate. The oxide is then removed from the first facet and a second oxide layer is grown on the first and second facets. Removing the oxide from the first facet includes shielding the second facet and exposing the substrate to a condition suitable for removing the oxide layer, such as a wet etching process. The second facet is then exposed to receive and a second oxide layer is grown on the first and second facets. Shielding the second facet includes applying a photoresist to the substrate and removing the photoresist from the first facet. Shielding may also include selectively metallizing the second facet.
Growing the first and second oxide layers includes exposing the silicon substrate to an oxidizing environment for first and second periods, respectively. The first period has a duration sufficient to grow oxide having a thickness about equal to S*(1−X/Y), where S is a final thickness of oxide grown on the second facet for a total period about equal to a sum of the first and second periods, X is a first growth rate for the second facet, and Y is a second growth rate of the first facet.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
At block 32, a second oxide layer 34 is grown in addition to the first oxide layer 16, as shown in
The method 26 illustrated in
The thicknesses of the first oxide layer 20 and second oxide layer 34 may be controlled by adjusting the length of time that the substrate 10 is subject to an oxidizing environment. Accordingly, the first oxide layer 20 may be formed by exposing the substrate 10 to the oxidizing environment for a first period t1 whereas the second oxide layer 34 is formed by exposing the substrate 10 to the oxidizing environment for a second period t2. The ratio of the second period relative to the sum of the first and second period (t2/(t1+t2)) will be equal to X/Y in order to achieve a uniform thickness.
For oxide layers having large thickness, such as above 5,000 Angstroms, the rate of oxide layer growth becomes significantly non-linear. Accordingly, the first and second periods may be adjusted to accommodate this nonlinearity. Equation 1 accommodates nonlinearity in oxide growth rates. A description of nonlinearity in silicon-oxide growth rates may be found in “Semiconductor Materials and Process Technology Handbook for Very Large Scale Integration and Ultra Large Scale Integration” (ed. Gary E. McGuire, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, N.J.).
Where t is the time required to form an oxide layer of thickness xO over a silicon substrate bearing an oxide layer having a thickness xi. B is a parabaolic rate constant and B/A is a linear rate constant used to describe oxide growth. B and B/A are calculated according to Equations 2 and 3 or Equations 4 and 5. Alternatively, B and B/A may be determined by referencing measured values illustrated in
Where Deff is the effective oxidant diffusion constant in oxide, k and h are rate constants at the Si—SiO2 and gas-oxide interfaces, Ck is an equilibrium concentration of the oxide species in the oxide, N1 is the number of oxidant molecules in the oxide unit volume.
Where T is the temperature at which the oxidation takes place expressed in degrees Kelvin and k is a rate constant at the Si—SiO2 and gas oxide interfaces.
For the 111 plane of silicon under dry oxidation conditions
For the 111 plane of silicon under wet oxidation conditions
For the 100 plane of silicon
In one embodiment of the method 26 the Equation 1 is used to calculate a time t1 used at block 28 for the duration of oxide growth during formation of the first oxide layer 20, such that when the second oxide layer 34 is grown thereunder at block 34 for a time t2 all facets 12a-12c and facets 16a, 16b will have substantially uniform thickness. The thickness of the first oxide layer 20 grown on the slower-growth facets 12a-12c is used as xi in Equation 1 as applied to the slower growth facets 12a-12c to determine a time t2 for oxide growth forming the second oxide layer 34 at block 32. Equation 1 is used to calculates a time t2 for growing a second oxide layer at block 32 such that the thickness x0 on the faster growth planes 16a, 16b and the thickness x0 on the slower growth planes 12a-12c bearing the first oxide layer 20 of thickness xi are equal to one another at a desired thickness.
For example, to achieve a thickness of about 10,150 Angstroms on both the slower growth facets 12a-12c and the faster growth facets 16a, 16b for a wet oxidation process carried out at 900° C., t1 is equal to about 2.8 hours and t2 is equal to about 10 hours.
In order to achieve oxide thicknesses varying locally the first oxide layer 20 is removed in areas where the oxide layer is to be thinner. The steps of oxidizing, shielding, and locally removing oxide, exposing, and oxidizing again may be repeated, selectively shielding different portions each iteration to achieve oxide layers having a broad range of thicknesses on a single substrate 10.
For both types of photoresist, the weakened photoresist is then removed at block 64 to expose the faster-growth facets 16a, 16b. The oxide on the faster-growth facets 16a, 16b is then removed at block 66. The hardened photoresist is removed at block 68 and a second oxide layer 34 is grown at block 70.
Referring to
Referring to
A method 122 for forming a multi-thickness oxide layer includes setting a counter i to zero at block 124. A first oxide layer having a thickness ti is grown at block 126. At block 128, areas Ai through A0 are shielded. At block 130 oxide is removed from all exposed areas. At block 132, the value of i is compared to variable N representing the total number of thicknesses being formed on the substrate 10. If i is equal to N, the method ends. If i is less than N, than i is incremented at block 134. Areas where no oxide is to be formed are left unshielded during the entire method 122.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the Claims that follow.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5383048 | Seaver | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5500544 | Park et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5696662 | Bauhahn | Dec 1997 | A |
| 6108212 | Lach et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6156620 | Puchner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6472301 | Lin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6493502 | Deliwala | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6526187 | Deliwala | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6546538 | Rubdi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6603889 | Deliwala | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6608945 | Deliwala | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6611636 | Deliwala | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6625348 | Deliwala | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6646747 | Deliwala | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6654511 | Deliwala | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6658173 | Delwala | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6671443 | Deliwala | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6690844 | Deliwala | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6690863 | Deliwala | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6727158 | Sundt et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6738546 | Deliwala | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6748125 | Deliwala | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6760498 | Delwala | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6821851 | Hergenrother et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823112 | Deliwala | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6826320 | Deliwala | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6842546 | Deliwala | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6845198 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6869881 | Deliwala | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6879751 | Deliwala | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6891685 | Deliwala et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6891985 | Delwala | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6895136 | Deliwala | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6897498 | Gothoskar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6898352 | Deliwala | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6912330 | Deliwala | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6917730 | Ghiron et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6934444 | Ghiron et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6944369 | Deliwala | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947615 | Deliwala | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6963118 | Deliwala et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6968110 | Patel et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6980720 | Gothoskar et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6987910 | Shappir et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6993225 | Patel et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6993243 | Delwala | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7000207 | Gothoskar et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7013067 | Ghiron et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020364 | Ghiron et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7176138 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 20030054639 | Deliwala | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20040190826 | Ghiron et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223768 | Shastri et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240822 | Patel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258347 | Gothoskar et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050094938 | Ghiron et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050094939 | Ghiron et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110108 | Patel et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123232 | Piede et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135727 | Piede et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050179986 | Gothoskar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189591 | Gothoskar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050194990 | Gothoskar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050201683 | Ghiron et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213873 | Piede et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220405 | Shappir et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236619 | Patel et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289490 | Shastri et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060018597 | Piede et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083144 | David et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO03077015 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070167027 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |