The present invention is generally related to recording of communication signals and, more particularly, is related to systems and methods for recording communication signals through a contact center.
A traditional passive tap recording technique includes recorders that are deployed along routes of communications. In this technique, each recorder operates similar to a “sniffer” by analyzing pass-by communication packets. The recorder records the packets corresponding to certain communication sessions based on its configuration.
First, with the growing usage of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology, many telephony-based businesses, such as contact centers, are adopting distributed telephony systems with local access to PSTN, which are still controlled by centralized soft switches. Many contact centers are using at-home agents with soft-phones on their personal computers (PCs). The distributed telephony system makes “recording along the communication routes”, needed for passive tap recording, difficult. Secondly, network security has now become a concern. The deployment of encryption technology has made passive tap recording become even more problematic.
In addition, many contact centers deploy recorders for quality monitoring purpose, instead of compliance. In this regard, only a small percentage of the communications are recorded and monitored. However, to assure the accuracy of the sampling, communications are randomly selected for recording across all branch offices. With passive tap recording, a large number of recorders will be required and each recorder will have very low usage.
A typical IP-based contact center using the passive tapping “sniffing” recording method is shown in
After several rounds of communication signals exchange, media communications between the agent's phone and customer's phone can proceed via media processing device and distribution devices. The distribution devices are network routers and switches. In order to record the media communications using passive tapping, recorders are deployed at the media processing device or distribution devices using the network traffic monitoring or duplicating features, such as the Cisco's Switch Port Analyzer (SPAN) feature, on these devices. These tapping features are often available to the recorders that are directly connected to the media processing device or distribution devices, namely to recorders deployed at each branch office. Hence, a large contact center having multiple branches, such as a branch in New York, a branch in Los Angeles, and a branch in Chicago, may need multiple recorders in each branch to record the media communications.
Systems and methods for recording media communication are provided. An exemplary method comprises the steps of: receiving an incoming communication from a first communication device; routing the incoming communication to a second communication device in a call center; transmitting media communications associated with the incoming media communication between the first communication device and the second communication device through a media application server; duplicating the media communications via the media application server; transmitting the duplicated media communications via the media application server; and recording the duplicated media communications.
Other systems, methods, features, and advantages of the present invention will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Many aspects of the invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present invention. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Disclosed herein are systems and methods for recording communication signals without requiring recording devices to be deployed along the route of the two end points of the communication. In particular, the recording of the communication signals can be achieved using a soft switch, a conference bridge, a phone, a media communication device, and/or a media application server.
Exemplary systems are first discussed with reference to the figures. Although these systems are described in detail, they are provided for purposes of illustration only and various modifications are feasible. After the exemplary systems are described, examples of flow diagrams and sequence diagrams of the systems are provided to explain the manner in which communication signals can be recorded.
Referring now in more detail to the figures,
Recording device(s) 226 can be deployed anywhere on the IP network 219 connected to the branch offices 203, 206. Alternatively or additionally, the recording devices 226 can communicate with media controlling/processing/distributing devices 213, 231 in a secure fashion in encrypted environments, for getting communication events and for sending instructions. With the capability of the recording devices 226 to communicate with the media controlling/processing/distributing devices 213, 231, the recording device 226 can selectively record communications in the contact center based on business policy. Alternatively or additionally, if a recording device is a cluster of recording devices, the recording device can communicate with the media controlling/processing/distributing devices 213, 231 to select which recording device from the cluster of recording devices to record the communications for load balancing purposes.
The media controlling/processing devices control the communication between customers and employees and between employees. The media controlling/processing devices can include, but are not limited to, voice gateways, soft switches, conference bridges, and multi-media application servers. The distributing devices can include, but are not limited to, routers and switches. Based on static configuration or instructions from the recording devices, the media controlling/processing devices can duplicate and transmit on-going communication between communication devices 209, 229, 223, 236 to the recording devices via the IP network 219 using its media processing features. Alternatively or additionally, the media controlling/processing devices can also instruct a communication device 209, 229 at the company premises 203, 206, respectively, to duplicate and transmit any on-going communications to the recording devices 226 using media processing features on the communication devices 209, 229. The operation of the system 200 is further described in relation to
In this embodiment, the soft switch 306 is operative to send a command to the agent phones 319, 323, 326 and voice gateway 306 via the company network 316, instructing the agent phones 319, 323, 326 and voice gateway 306 to transmit media communications associated with the incoming calls through the conference bridge 309 via the company network 316. The soft switch 306 also sends a command to the conference bridge 309 via the company network 316 to duplicate and transmit the media communication to the voice endpoint recorder 339 using the IP network 333. The operation of the system 300 is further described in relation to
Alternatively or additionally, the soft switch can receive instructions for recording the media communication from the voice endpoint recorder 339 via the IP network 333. In turn, the soft switch sends a command based on the received instructions to the conference bridge 309. Alternatively or additionally, the soft switch 306 can have capabilities of a conference bridge. That is, the soft switch 306 can duplicate and transmit the media communication to the voice endpoint recorder 339 without using the conference bridge 309.
As shown in
Agent phones 449, 453 within the branches 443, 446 can receive media communications from within the contact center premises 403 or from customer phone 429. The soft switch 406 can send a command to the agent phones 449, 453 instructing the agent phones 449, 453 to transmit media communication through the conference bridge 409 via the IP network 433. The soft switch 406 also can send a command to the conference bridge 409 via the company network 416 to duplicate and transmit the media communication associated with the agent phones 449, 453 to the voice endpoint recorder 439 using the IP network 433. The operation of the system 400 will also be described in greater detail in relation to
As in
In this embodiment, the media application server 609 includes a media controller 606 and a media processor 607. The media controller 606 processes media communications, identifies the type of media communications, and routes the media communications to media communication devices 619, 623 and media processor 607, via the company network 616. The media controller 606 can send a command to the media communication devices 619, 623 via the company network 616, instructing the media communication devices 619, 623 to transmit the media communications through the media application server 609 via the company network 616. Once the media application server 609 receives media communications, the media processor 607 duplicates and transmits the media communications to the media endpoint recorder 639 using the IP network 633. Alternatively or additionally, the media controller 606 can receive instructions for recording the media communications from the media endpoint recorder 639 via the IP network 633. In turn, the media controller 606 sends a command based on the received instructions to the media processor 607. The operation of the system 600 is further described in relation to
Alternatively or additionally, the media communication devices 619, 623 can have the capabilities of duplicating and transmitting the media communications to a media endpoint recorder 639. For example, the media controller 606 manages the media communications and routes the media communications to the media communication devices 619, 623 via the company network 616. The media controller 606 communicates with the media communication devices 619, 623 to determine whether the communication devices 619, 623 can duplicate and transmit the media communications to a media endpoint recorder 639. If the communication devices 619, 623 have the capability, the media controller 606 instructs the media communication devices 619, 623 via the company network 616 to duplicate and transmit media communications to the media endpoint recorder 639 using the IP network 633. Alternatively or additionally, the media controller 606 can receive instructions for recording the media communications from the media endpoint recorder 639 via the IP network 633. In turn, the media controller 606 sends a command based on the received instructions to the communication devices 619, 623.
In one scenario, for example, calls from a customer phone can be routed to a voice gateway 713, which can route the calls to the soft switch 706. The soft switch 706 receives incoming calls and routes the calls to the agent phones 719, 723, 726. The soft switch 706 communicates with the conference bridge 709 via the company network 716. The IP telephony system 703 communicates with the multi-media endpoint recorder 743 via an IP network 733. In this example, the soft switch 706 is operative to send a command to the agent phones 719, 723, 726 and voice gateway 706 via the company network 716, instructing the agent phones 719, 723, 726 and voice gateway 706 to transmit media communications associated with the incoming calls through the conference bridge 709 via the company network 716. The soft switch 706 also sends a command to the conference bridge 709 via the company network 716 to duplicate and transmit the media communication to the multi-media endpoint recorder 743 using the IP network 733.
In another scenario, for example, the soft switch 706 can have capabilities of a conference bridge, as mentioned above. The soft switch 706 can duplicate and transmit the media communication without the conference bridge 709 to the multi-media endpoint recorder 743 using the IP network 733.
In yet another scenario, for example, the soft switch 706 communicates with the agent phones 719, 723, 726 to determine whether the phones can duplicate and transmit media communications to the multi-media endpoint recorder 743. If the agent phones have the capability, the soft switch 706 instructs the agent phones 719, 723, 726 via the company network 716 to duplicate and transmit media communications associated with the incoming calls to the multi-media endpoint recorder 743 using the IP network 733.
In yet another scenario, for example, the media application server 749 receives incoming non-voice media communications, identifies the type of non-voice media communications, and routes the non-voice media communications to media communication devices 759, 763 via the company network 716. The media application server 749 can send a command to the media communication devices 759, 763 via the company network 716, instructing the media communication devices 759, 763 to transmit the non-voice media communications through the media application server 749 via the company network 716. The media application server 749 duplicates and transmits the non-voice media communications to the multi-media endpoint recorder 743 using the IP network 733.
In yet another scenario, for example, the media communication devices 759, 763 can have the capabilities of duplicating and transmitting the non-voice media communications to the multi-media endpoint recorder 743. For example, the media application server 749 manages the non-voice media communications and routes the non-voice media communications to the media communication devices 759, 763 via the company network 716. The media application server 749 communicates with the media communication devices 759, 763 to determine whether the communication devices 759, 763 can duplicate and transmit the non-voice media communications to the multi-media endpoint recorder 743. If the communication devices 759, 763 have the capability, the media application server 749 instructs the media communication devices 759, 763 via the company network 716 to duplicate and transmit the non-voice media communications to the multi-media endpoint recorder 743 using the IP network 733.
At event 908, the soft switch instructs the conference bridge to duplicate and transmit the media communication to a voice endpoint recorder. The instruction to the conference bridge can include an IP address and a port of the voice endpoint recorder. At event 909, the called phone transmits the media communication to the conference bridge such as by using the IP address/port of the conference bridge. At event 913, the conference bridge duplicates the media communication from the called phone and transmits the duplicated media communication to the recorder such as by using the IP address/port of the voice endpoint recorder. The recorder receives and records the duplicated media communication from the called phone. Notably, the voice endpoint recorder can be located anywhere inside or outside the contact center premises as long as the recorder is connected to an IP network connected to the contact center.
At event 916, the conference bridge routes the media communication from the called phone to the calling agent phone or the voice gateway. At event 919, the calling agent phone or the voice gateway transmits the media communication to the conference bridge such as by using the IP address and port of the conference bridge. At event 923, the conference bridge duplicates the media communication from the calling agent phone or the voice gateway and transmits the duplicated media communication to the recorder such as by using an IP address and a port of the recorder. The recorder receives and records the duplicated media communication from the calling agent phone or the voice gateway. At event 926, the conference bridge routes the media communication from the calling agent phone or the voice gateway to the called phone of the contact center premises. Thereafter, the sequence is returned to event 909 so that the called phone can transmit the media communication to the conference bridge as instructed by the soft switch, as shown at event 929.
At event 1009, the called phone receives the media communication from the calling agent phone or the voice gateway, duplicates the media communication and transmits the duplicated media communication to the recorder such as by using the IP address and port of the recorder. The recorder receives and records the duplicated media communication from the calling agent phone or the voice gateway. At event 1013, the called phone transmits the media communication to the calling agent phone or the voice gateway. The called phone can duplicate its media communication and transmits the duplicated media communication to the recorder. The recorder receives and records the duplicated media communication from the called phone. At event 1016, the calling agent phone or the voice gateway transmits its media communication to the called phone. At event 1019, the sequence is returned to event 1009 during which the called phone receives the media communication from the calling agent phone or the voice gateway, duplicates the media communication and transmits the duplicated media communication to the recorder.
At event 1119, the calling and called communication devices transmit and receive the media communications to and from the media application server. At event 1123, the media application server duplicates the media communications between the calling and called communication devices and transmits the duplicated media communications such as by using an IP address and a port of a media endpoint recorder. The media endpoint recorder receives and records the duplicated media communication from the calling and called communication devices.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present invention and protected by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/395,759, filed on Mar. 31, 2006, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3594919 | De Bell et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3705271 | De Bell et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
4510351 | Costello et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4684349 | Ferguson et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4694483 | Cheung | Sep 1987 | A |
4763353 | Canale et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4815120 | Kosich | Mar 1989 | A |
4924488 | Kosich | May 1990 | A |
4953159 | Hayden et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5016272 | Stubbs et al. | May 1991 | A |
5101402 | Chiu et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5117225 | Wang | May 1992 | A |
5210789 | Jeffus et al. | May 1993 | A |
5239460 | LaRoche | Aug 1993 | A |
5241625 | Epard et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5267865 | Lee et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5299260 | Shaio | Mar 1994 | A |
5311422 | Loftin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315711 | Barone et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317628 | Misholi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5347306 | Nitta | Sep 1994 | A |
5388252 | Dreste et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396371 | Henits et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5432715 | Shigematsu et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5465286 | Clare et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475625 | Glaschick | Dec 1995 | A |
5485569 | Goldman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491780 | Fyles et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499291 | Kepley | Mar 1996 | A |
5535256 | Maloney et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5572652 | Robusto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577112 | Cambray et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5590171 | Howe et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5597312 | Bloom et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5619183 | Ziegra et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5696906 | Peters et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717879 | Moran et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721842 | Beasley et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5742670 | Bennett | Apr 1998 | A |
5748499 | Trueblood | May 1998 | A |
5778182 | Cathey et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784452 | Carney | Jul 1998 | A |
5790798 | Beckett, II et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796952 | Davis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5809247 | Richardson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809250 | Kisor | Sep 1998 | A |
5825869 | Brooks et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835572 | Richardson, Jr. et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862330 | Anupam et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864772 | Alvarado et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867559 | Jorgensen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884032 | Bateman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907680 | Nielsen | May 1999 | A |
5918214 | Perkowski | Jun 1999 | A |
5923746 | Baker et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933811 | Angles et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944791 | Scherpbier | Aug 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958016 | Chang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964836 | Rowe et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978648 | George et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982857 | Brady | Nov 1999 | A |
5987466 | Greer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990852 | Szamrej | Nov 1999 | A |
5991373 | Pattison et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991796 | Anupam et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005932 | Bloom | Dec 1999 | A |
6009429 | Greer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014134 | Bell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014647 | Nizzari et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018619 | Allard et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6035332 | Ingrassia et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038544 | Machin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039575 | L'Allier et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057841 | Thurlow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058163 | Pattison et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061798 | Coley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072860 | Kek et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076099 | Chen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078894 | Clawson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084581 | Hunt | Jul 2000 | A |
6091712 | Pope et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108711 | Beck et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122665 | Bar et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122668 | Teng et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130668 | Stein | Oct 2000 | A |
6138139 | Beck et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144991 | England | Nov 2000 | A |
6146148 | Stuppy | Nov 2000 | A |
6151622 | Fraenkel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154771 | Rangan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157808 | Hollingsworth | Dec 2000 | A |
6171109 | Ohsuga | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182094 | Humpleman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195679 | Bauersfeld et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201948 | Cook et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211451 | Tohgi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225993 | Lindblad et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230197 | Beck et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236977 | Verba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244758 | Solymar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263049 | Kuhn | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282548 | Burner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286030 | Wenig et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286046 | Bryant | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288753 | DeNicola et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289340 | Purnam et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301462 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301573 | McIlwaine et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324282 | McIlwaine et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347374 | Drake et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351467 | Dillon | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353851 | Anupam et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360250 | Anupam et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370574 | House et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404857 | Blair et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411989 | Anupam et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418471 | Shelton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459787 | McIlwaine et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6487195 | Choung et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493758 | McLain | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502131 | Vaid et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510220 | Beckett, II et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535909 | Rust | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542602 | Elazar | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546405 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560328 | Bondarenko et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6583806 | Ludwig et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6606657 | Zilberstein et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6665644 | Kanevsky et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674447 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683633 | Holtzblatt et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697858 | Ezerzer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6724887 | Eilbacher et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738456 | Wrona et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6751297 | Nelkenbaum | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757361 | Blair et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772396 | Cronin et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775377 | McIlwaine et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792575 | Samaniego et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810414 | Brittain | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6820083 | Nagy et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823384 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6870916 | Henrikson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6901438 | Davis et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6959078 | Eilbacher et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6965886 | Govrin et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7043008 | Dewan | May 2006 | B1 |
7613290 | Williams et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8130938 | Williams et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010000962 | Rajan | May 2001 | A1 |
20010032335 | Jones | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043697 | Cox et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020038363 | MacLean | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052948 | Baudu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065911 | Von Klopp et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065912 | Catchpole et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075880 | Dolinar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020128925 | Angeles | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143925 | Pricer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165954 | Eshghi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030055883 | Wiles et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030079020 | Gourraud et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030144900 | Whitmer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154240 | Nygren et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040034672 | Inagaki | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040083099 | Scarano et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100507 | Hayner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040165717 | McIlwaine et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040247205 | Nagaya et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018622 | Halbraich et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053073 | Kloth et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074026 | Soncodi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050138560 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060067309 | Zhakov et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070121602 | Sin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121885 | Sin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070230444 | Williams et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263787 | Dong et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080082669 | Williams et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090016522 | Torres et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0453128 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0773687 | May 1997 | EP |
0989720 | Mar 2000 | EP |
2369263 | May 2002 | GB |
WO9843380 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO0016207 | Mar 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/395,759. |
“Customer Spotlight: Navistar International,” Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 1, 2002. |
DKSystems Integrates QM Perception with OnTrack for Training, Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 1, 2002, unverified cover date of Jun. 15, 1999. |
“OnTrack Online Delivers New Web Functionality,” Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 2, 2002, unverified cover date of Oct. 5, 1999. |
“Price Waterhouse Coopers Case Study: The Business Challenge,” Web page, unverified cover date of 2000. |
Abstract, networking: “An Online Webliography,” Technical Training pp. 4-5 (Nov./Dec. 1998). |
Adams et al., “Our Turn-of-the-Century Trend Watch” Technical Training, pp. 46-47 (Nov./Dec. 1998). |
Barron, “The Road to Performance: Three Vignettes,” Technical Skills and Training, pp. 12-14 (Jan. 1997). |
Bauer, “Technology Tools: Just-in-Time Desktop Training is Quick, Easy, and Affordable,” Technical Training, pp. 8-11 (May/Jun. 1998). |
Beck et al., “Applications of AI in Education,” AMC Crossroads vol. 1:1-13 (Fall 1996), Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 12, 2002. |
Benson and Cheney, “Best Practices in Training Delivery,” Technical Training pp. 14-17 (Oct. 1996). |
Bental and Cawsey, “Personalized and Adaptive Systems for Medical Consumer Applications,” Communications ACM 45(5):62-63 (May 2002). |
Witness Systems promotional brochure for eQuality entitled “Building Customer Loyalty Through Business-Driven Recording of Multimedia Interactions in your Contact Center” (2000). |
Benyon and Murray, “Adaptive Systems: from intelligent tutoring to autonomous agents,” pp. 1-52, Web page, unknown date. |
Blumenthal et al., “Reducing Development Costs with Intelligent Tutoring System Shells,” pp. 1-5, Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 9, 2002, unverified cover date of Jun. 10, 1996. |
Brusilovsky et al., “Distributed intelligent tutoring on the Web,” Proceedings of the 8th World Conference of the AIED Society, Kobe, Japan, Aug. 18-22, pp. 1-9 Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 12, 2002, unverified cover date of Aug. 18-22, 1997. |
Brusilovsky and Pesin, ISIS-Tutor: An Intelligent Learning Environment for CD/ISIS Users, @pp. 1-15 Web page, unverified print date of May 2, 2002. |
Brusilovsky, “Adaptive Educational Systems on the World-Wide-Web: A Review of Available Technologies,” pp. 1-10, Web Page, unverified print date of Apr. 12, 2002. |
Byrnes et al., “The Development of a Multiple-Choice and True-False Testing Environment on the Web,” pp. 1-8, Web page, unverified print date Apr. 12, 2002, unverified cover date of 1995. |
Calvi and De Bra, “Improving the Usability of Hypertext Courseware through Adaptive Linking,” ACM, unknown page numbers (1997). |
Coffey, “Are Performance Objectives Really Necessary?” Technical Skills and Training pp. 25-27 (Oct. 1995). |
Cohen, “Knowledge Management's Killer App,” pp. 1-11, Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 12, 2002, unverified cover date of 2001. |
Cole-Gomolski, “New ways to manage E-Classes,” Computerworld 32(48):4344 (Nov. 30, 1998). |
Cross, “Sun Microsystems—the SunTAN Story,” Internet Time Group 8 (2001). |
Cybulski and Linden, “Teaching Systems Analysis and Design Using Multimedia and Patterns,” unknown date, unknown source. |
De Bra et al., “Adaptive Hypermedia: From Systems to Framework,” ACM (2000). |
De Bra, “Adaptive Educational Hypermedia on the Web,” Communications ACM 45(5):60-61 (May 2002). |
Dennis and Gruner, “Computer Managed Instruction at Arthur Andersen & Company: A Status Report,” Educational Technical, pp. 7-16 (Mar. 1992). |
Diessel et al., “Individualized Course Generation: A Marriage Between CAL and ICAL,” Computers Educational 22(1/2) 57-64 (1994). |
Dyreson, “An Experiment in Class Management Using the World-Wide Web,” pp. 1-12, Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 12, 2002. |
E Learning Community, “Excellence in Practice Award: Electronic Learning Technologies,” Personal Learning Network pp. 1-11, Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 12, 2002. |
Eklund and Brusilovsky, “The Value of Adaptivity in Hypermedia Learning Environments: A Short Review of Empirical Evidence,” pp. 1-8, Web page, unverified print date of May 2, 2002. |
e-Learning the future of learning, THINQ Limited, London, Version 1.0 (2000). |
Eline, “A Trainer's Guide to Skill Building,” Technical Training pp. 34-41 (Sep./Oct. 1998). |
Eline, “Case Study: Bridging the Gap in Canada's IT Skills,” Technical Skills and Training pp. 23-25 (Jul. 1997). |
Eline, “Case Study: IBT's Place in the Sun,” Technical Training pp. 12-17 (Aug./Sep. 1997). |
Fritz, “CB templates for productivity: Authoring system templates for trainers,” Emedia Professional 10(8):6876 (Aug. 1997). |
Fritz, “ToolBook II: Asymetrix's updated authoring software tackles the Web,” Emedia Professional 10(2):102106 (Feb. 1997). |
Gibson et al., “A Comparative Analysis of Web-Based Testing and Evaluation Systems,” pp. 1-8, Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 11, 2002. |
Hallberg and DeFiore, “Curving Toward Performance: Following a Hierarchy of Steps Toward a Performance Orientation,” Technical Skills and Training pp. 9-11 (Jan. 1997). |
Harsha, “Online Training “Sprints” Ahead,” Technical Training pp. 27-29 (Jan./Feb. 1999). |
Heideman, “Training Technicians for a High-Tech Future: These six steps can help develop technician training for high-tech work,” pp. 11-14 (Feb./Mar. 1995). |
Heideman, “Writing Performance Objectives Simple as A-B-C (and D),” Technical Skills and Training pp. 5-7 (May/Jun. 1996). |
Hollman, “Train Without Pain: the Benefits of Computer-Based Training Tools,” pp. 1-11, Web page, unverified print date of Mar. 20, 2002, unverified cover date of Jan. 1, 2000. |
Koonce, “Where Technology and Training Meet,” Technical Training pp. 10-15 (Nov./Dec. 1998). |
Kursh, “Going the distance with Web-based training,” Training and Development 52(3):5053 (Mar. 1998). |
Larson, “Enhancing Performance Through Customized Online Learning Support,” Technical Skills and Training pp. 25-27 (May/Jun. 1997). |
Linton et al., “OWL: A Recommender System for Organization-Wide Learning,” Educational Technical Society 3 (1):62-76 (2000). |
Lucadamo and Cheney, “Best Practices in Technical Training,” Technical Training pp. 21-26 (Oct. 1997). |
McNamara, “Monitoring Solutions: Quality Must Be Seen and Heard,” Inbound/Outbound pp. 66-67 (Dec. 1989). |
Merrill, “The New Component Design Theory: Instruction design for courseware authoring,” Instructional Science 16:19-34 (1987). |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 4, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/769,545. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 16, 2012 in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/770,517. |
Kane, AOL-Tivo: You've Got Interactive TV, ZDNN, Aug. 17, 1999. |
Kay, “E-Mail in Your Kitchen”, PC World Online, Mar. 28, 1996. |
Kenny, “TV Meets Internet”, PC World Online, Mar. 28, 1996. |
Linderholm, “Avatar Debuts Home Theater PC”, PC World Online, Dec. 1, 1999. |
Mendoza, “Order Pizza While You Watch”, ABCNews.com, Dec. 13, 1999. |
Moody, “WebTV: What the Big Deal?”, ABCNews.com, Dec. 13, 1999. |
Murdorf et al., “Interactive Television—Is There Life After the Internet?”, Interactive TV News, Dec. 9, 1999. |
Needle, “PC, TV or Both?”, PC World Online, Dec. 14, 1999. |
Interview with Steve Perlman, CEO of Web-TV Networks, PC World Online, Dec. 14, 1999. |
Press, Two Cultures, The Internet and Interactive TV, Universite de Montreal, Dec. 9, 1999. |
Reuters, “Will TV Take Over Your PC?”, PC World Online, Dec. 14, 1999. |
Rohde, “Gates Touts Interactive TV”, InfoWorld, Oct. 14, 1999. |
Ross, “Broadcasters Use TV Signals to Send Data”, PC World, Oct. 1996. |
Schlisserman, “Is Web TV a Lethal Weapon?”, PC World Online, Nov. 14, 1996. |
Stewart, “Interactive Television at Home: Television Meets the Internet”, Aug. 1998. |
Swedlow, “Computer TV Shows: Ready for Prime Time?”, PC World Online, Jan. 1997. |
Wilson, “U.S. West Revisits Interactive TV”, Interactive Week, Nov. 28, 1999. |
Klein, “Command Decision Training Support Technology,” Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 12, 2002. |
Minton-Eversole, “IBT Training Truths Behind the Hype,” Technical Skills and Training pp. 15-19 (Jan. 1997). |
Mizoguchi, “Intelligent Tutoring Systems: The Current State of the Art,” Trans. IEICE E73(3):297-307 (Mar. 1990). |
Mostow and Aist, “The Sounds of Silence: Towards Automated Evaluation of Student Learning a Reading Tutor that Listens” American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Web page, unknown date Aug. 1997. |
Mullier et al., “A Web base Intelligent Tutoring System,” pp. 1-6, Web page, unverified print date of May 2, 2002. |
Nash, Database Marketing, 1993, pp. 158-165, 172-185, McGraw Hill, Inc., USA. |
Nelson et al., “The Assessment of End-User Training Needs,” Communications ACM 38(7):27-39 (Jul. 1995). |
O'Herron, “CenterForce Technologies' CenterForce Analyzer,” Web page, unverified print date of Mar. 20, 2002, unverified cover date of Jun. 1, 1999. |
O'Roark, “Basic Skills Get a Boost,” Technical Training pp. 10-13 (Jul./Aug. 1998). |
Pamphlet, “On Evaluating Educational Innovations,” authored by Alan Lesgold, unverified cover date of Mar. 5, 1998. |
Papa et al., “A Differential Diagnostic Skills Assessment and Tutorial Tool,” Computer Education 18(1-3):45-50 (1992). |
PCT International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/02541, mailed May 12, 2003. |
Phaup, “New Software Puts Computerized Tests on the Internet: Presence Corporation announces breakthrough Question Mark Web product,” Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 1, 2002. |
Phaup, “QM Perception Links with Integrity Training's WBT Manager to Provide Enhanced Assessments for Web-Based Courses,” Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 1, 2002, unverified cover date of Mar. 25, 1999. |
Phaup, “Question Mark Introduces Access Export Software,” Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 2, 2002, unverified cover date of Mar. 1, 1997. |
Phaup, “Question Mark Offers Instant Online Feedback for Web Quizzes and Questionnaires: University of California assist with Beta Testing, Server scripts now available to high-volume users,” Web page, unverified print date of Apr. 1, 2002, unverified cover date of May 6, 1996. |
Piskurich, “Now-You-See-'Em, Now-You-Don't Learning Centers,” Technical Training pp. 18-21 (Jan./Feb. 1999). |
Read, “Sharpening Agents' Skills,” pp. 1-15, Web page, unverified print date of Mar. 20, 2002, unverified cover date of Oct. 1, 1999. |
Reid, “On Target: Assessing Technical Skills,” Technical Skills and Training pp. 6-8 (May/Jun. 1995). |
Stormes, “Case Study: Restructuring Technical Training Using ISD,” Technical Skills and Training pp. 23-26 (Feb./Mar. 1997). |
Tennyson, “Artificial Intelligence Methods in Computer-Based Instructional Design,” Journal of Instruction Development 7(3):17-22 (1984). |
The Editors, Call Center, “The Most Innovative Call Center Products We Saw in 1999,” Web page, unverified print date of Mar. 20, 2002, unverified cover date of Feb. 1, 2000. |
Tinoco et al., “Online Evaluation in WWW-based Courseware,” ACM pp. 194-198 (1997). |
Uiterwijk et al., “The virtual classroom,” InfoWorld 20(47):6467 (Nov. 23, 1998). |
Unknown Author, “Long-distance learning,” InfoWorld 20(36):7276 (1998). |
Untitled, 10th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference vol. 1 pp. 124-126 (2000). |
Watson and Belland, “Use of Learner Data in Selecting Instructional Content for Continuing Education,” Journal of Instructional Development 8(4):29-33 (1985). |
Weinschenk, “Performance Specifications as Change Agents,” Technical Training pp. 12-15 (Oct. 1997). |
Witness Systems promotional brochure for eQuality entitled “Bringing eQuality to eBusiness.” Sep. 1999. |
Aspect Call Center Product Specification, “Release 2.0”, Aspect Telecommunications Corporation, May 23, 1998, 798. |
Metheus X Window Record and Playback, XRP Features and Benefits, 2 pages, Sep. 1994 LPRs. |
“Keeping an Eye on Your Agents,” Call Center Magazine, pp. 32-34, Feb. 1993 LPRs & 798. |
Anderson: Interactive TVs New Approach, The Standard, Oct. 11, 1999. |
Ante, “Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Cryptography Legislation . . . (But Were too Sensible to Ask)”, PC World Online, Dec. 14, 1999. |
Berst, “It's Baa-aack. How Interactive TV is Sneaking Into Your Living Room”, The AnchorDesk, May 10, 1999. |
Berst, “Why Interactive TV Won't Turn You On (Yet)”, The AnchorDesk, Jul. 13, 1999. |
Borland and Davis, “US West Plans Web Services on TV”, CNETNews.com, Nov. 22, 1999. |
Brown, “Let PC Technology Be Your TV Guide”, PC Magazine, Jun. 7, 1999. |
Brown, “Interactive TV: The Sequel”, NewMedia, Feb. 10, 1998. |
Cline, “Deja vu—Will Interactive TV Make It This Time Around?”, DevHead, Jul. 9, 1999. |
Crouch, “TV Channels on the Web”, PC World, Sep. 15, 1999. |
D'Amico, “Interactive TV Gets $99 set-top box”, IDG.net, Oct. 6, 1999. |
Davis, “Satellite Systems Gear Up for Interactive TV Fight”, CNETNews.com, Sep. 30, 1999. |
Diederich, “Web TV Data Gathering Raises Privacy Concerns”, ComputerWorld, Oct. 13, 1998. |
Digital Broadcasting, Interactive TV News, Dec. 9, 1999. |
EchoStar, “MediaX Mix Interactive Multimedia With Interactive Television”, PRNews Wire, Jan. 11, 1999. |
Furger, “The Internet Meets the Couch Potato”, PCWorld, Oct. 1996. |
“Hong Kong Comes First with Interactive TV”, SCI-TECH, Dec. 4, 1997. |
“Interactive TV Overview TimeLine”, Interactive TV News, Jan. 13, 1999. |
“Interactive TV Wars Heat Up”, Industry Standard, Nov. 10, 1998. |
Needle, “Will the Net Kill Network TV?” PC World Online, Mar. 10, 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11395759 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 12769552 | US |