The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for generating a 3D soft microstructure.
Molding is one of the most common techniques for manufacturing soft centimeter-scale devices. However, at smaller scales, the structural complexity that can be obtained is limited by the manufacturability of the mold, thus restricting the design mostly to single degree-of-freedom (DoF) continuum bending structures. 3D printing allows nearly arbitrary geometries, yet the paucity of compatible soft materials and limited resolution engenders mostly static devices below the mesoscale. 4D printing has been proposed to develop dynamically evolving structures exploiting time-dependent shape-shifting of 3D printed, stimuli-responsive materials. Planar manufacturing processes have also been used for fabricating soft devices across different scales, from meter sized soft robots, to millimeter scale soft microdevices. Among planar processes, soft lithography enables dense packing of extremely fine features, leading to devices capable of (fluidic) computation, as widely demonstrated in the field of microfluidics. However, with no means of altering the overall profile or shape, joints are undefinable and large motions are unattainable, relegating most soft lithographic devices to a purely two-dimensional existence. A number of manufacturing methods for developing innovative soft microdevices have also been proposed, such as hydrogel-based micropatterning, electrically assisted ionoprinting, and synthesis of materials responsive to light, temperature and magnetic fields for drug delivery systems.
Previous work has demonstrated the possibility of combining laser cutting and soft lithographic techniques to release simple soft microactuators from an elastomeric matrix, while templateless prototyping of polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic structures exploiting laser machining have also been proposed.
Systems and methods for fabricating 3D soft microstructures are disclosed herein. A soft microstructure is provided that includes a plurality of elastomeric layers with fluidic networks formed between at least two of the elastomeric layers. At least one of the elastomeric layers comprises at least one structural actuator and at least one functional actuator. The structural actuator is configured to accept a phase-changing material to convert the structural actuator into a permanent structural element by self-folding a portion of the microstructure to form a three dimensional structure from a two dimensional structure. The at least one functional actuator is configured to accept an inert working fluid to allow for motion of the 3D structure formed by the at least one structural actuator.
In some embodiments, any of the plurality of elastomeric layers can contain at least one structural actuator or at least one functional actuator or both at least one structural actuator and the at least one functional actuator.
In some embodiments, the phase-changing material is a curable material that is configured to cause self-folding into a three dimensional structure as the curable material cures. In some embodiments, the phase-changing material is a functional material such that the three dimensional structure is responsive to a stimuli. For example, the stimuli can be ultraviolet light such that the phase-changing material is cured with the UV light, or the stimuli can be thermal energy such that the phase-changing material is cured with the thermal energy.
In some embodiments, a form of the three dimensional structure can be based on a number of the plurality of elastomeric layers. In some embodiments, a form of the three dimensional structure is based on a placement and size of the fluidic networks formed in the plurality of elastomeric layers.
A soft microstructure is provided that includes a plurality of elastomeric layers with fluidic networks formed between at least two of the elastomeric layers. Any of the elastomeric layers can comprise at least one structural actuator and at least one functional actuator. The at least one structural actuator is configured to accept a phase-changing material to convert the structural actuator into a permanent structural element by self-folding a portion of the microstructure to form a three dimensional structure from a two dimensional structure. The at least one functional actuator is configured to accept an inert working fluid to allow for motion of the 3D structure formed by the at least one structural actuator.
In some embodiments, the at least one structural actuator and the at least one functional actuator are formed in the same elastomeric layer. In some embodiments, the at least one structural actuator and the at least one functional actuator are formed in different ones of the plurality of elastomeric layers. In some embodiment, a form of the three dimensional structure is based on a number of the plurality of elastomeric layers. In some embodiments, a form of the three dimensional structure is based on a placement and size of the fluidic networks formed in the plurality of elastomeric layers.
A method of fabricating a soft microstructure is also provided, and comprises applying soft lithographic techniques to form a plurality of elastomeric layers, and forming one or more two dimensional patterns in at least one of plurality of elastomeric layers to form at least one actuator in at least one of the plurality of elastomeric layers. The plurality of elastomeric layers are aligned and the plurality of elastomeric layers are bonded to each other. The plurality of elastomeric layers can form a two dimensional soft microstructure capable of self-folding using one of the least one actuators to form a three dimensional structure.
In some embodiments, forming the one or more two dimensional patterns is achieved by laser cutting. In some embodiments, forming the one or more two dimensional patterns is achieved by a process selected from the group consisting of molding, 3D printing, and stamping.
The present disclosure is further described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of exemplary embodiments, in which like reference numerals represent similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings, and wherein:
While the above-identified drawings set forth presently disclosed embodiments, other embodiments are also contemplated, as noted in the discussion. This disclosure presents illustrative embodiments by way of representation and not limitation. Numerous other modifications and embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art which fall within the scope and spirit of the principles of the presently disclosed embodiments.
The following description provides exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the disclosure. Rather, the following description of the exemplary embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing one or more exemplary embodiments. It will be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the spirit and scope of the presently disclosed embodiments.
Specific details are given in the following description to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. For example, systems, processes, and other elements in the presently disclosed embodiments may be shown as components in block diagram form in order not to obscure the embodiments in unnecessary detail. In other instances, well-known processes, structures, and techniques may be shown without unnecessary detail in order to avoid obscuring the embodiments.
Also, it is noted that individual embodiments may be described as a process which is depicted as a flowchart, a flow diagram, a data flow diagram, a structure diagram, or a block diagram. Although a flowchart may describe the operations as a sequential process, many of the operations can be performed in parallel or concurrently. In addition, the order of the operations may be re-arranged. A process may be terminated when its operations are completed, but could have additional steps not discussed or included in a figure. Furthermore, not all operations in any particularly described process may occur in all embodiments. A process may correspond to a method, a function, a procedure, a subroutine, a subprogram, etc. When a process corresponds to a function, its termination corresponds to a return of the function to the calling function or the main function.
Subject matter will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and which show, by way of illustration, specific example aspects and embodiments of the present disclosure. Subject matter may, however, be embodied in a variety of different forms and, therefore, covered or claimed subject matter is intended to be construed as not being limited to any example embodiments set forth herein; example embodiments are provided merely to be illustrative. The following detailed description is, therefore, not intended to be taken in a limiting sense.
In general, terminology may be understood at least in part from usage in context. For example, terms, such as “and”, “or”, or “and/or,” as used herein may include a variety of meanings that may depend at least in part upon the context in which such terms are used. Typically, “or” if used to associate a list, such as A, B, or C, is intended to mean A, B, and C, here used in the inclusive sense, as well as A, B, or C, here used in the exclusive sense. In addition, the term “one or more” as used herein, depending at least in part upon context, may be used to describe any feature, structure, or characteristic in a singular sense or may be used to describe combinations of features, structures or characteristics in a plural sense. Similarly, terms, such as “a,” “an,” or “the,” again, may be understood to convey a singular usage or to convey a plural usage, depending at least in part upon context. In addition, the term “based on” may be understood as not necessarily intended to convey an exclusive set of factors and may, instead, allow for existence of additional factors not necessarily expressly described, again, depending at least in part on context.
A method is provided to increase the structural and (consequently) functional complexity of soft microstructures. By merging multilayer soft lithography and bulk or precision layer micromachining, a fabrication techniques can create a new class of soft microstructures, for example “Microfluidic Origami for Reconfigurable Pneumatic/Hydraulic”(MORPH) systems. In some embodiments, lithographic techniques can be used to manufacture elastomeric layers with embossed features that can be modified by means of laser micromachining. It will be understood that various methods can be used to form 2D patterns in the elastomeric layers beyond laser micromachining, including but not limited to 3D printing, molding, and stamping. After precision alignment and bonding of individual layers, the result is a soft laminate with embedded microfluidic circuitry and a nearly arbitrarily complex profile. Upon pressurization, chambers within the microfluidic circuitry expand to actuate portions of the laminate through preprogrammed motions. Actuation with an inert working fluid (such as air or water) permits recovery of the initial configuration upon depressurization, while the use of a phase-changing material converts deformed actuators into permanent structural elements. Combining both actuation strategies enables the transformation of static 2D laminates into dynamic 3D structures.
A manufacturing process is provided that can enable a process for developing soft complex microstructures. The dimensionally of a soft microstructure can be increased. Starting from a 2D process, a 3D structure can be generated, and in one embodiment can be embedded with functional microfluidic circuitry. With current manufacturing methods, it is not possible to embed this level of complexity at this scale. It can also be possible to integrate multiscale features, from the centimeter to almost nanometer scale as the process combines the scalability of soft lithography and laser cutting. There can be various advantages of the fabrication process described herein, including the use of a purely 2D process, the combination of laser cutting and soft lithography, creating both constant curvature structures and flexure based mechanisms, providing multiple scale features, providing functional microfluidic circuits, and the use of multiple materials including functional materials for stimuli responsive structures.
There is a distinction between structural and functional complexity. In some embodiments, structural complexity is defined in terms of characteristics of the static system, such as the spatial dimensionality (i.e., whether 2D or 3D), the number and diversity of materials involved, and geometric considerations (e.g., shape and minimum feature size). Functional complexity encompasses the dynamic aspects of the system, such as the number of DoF, the achievable motions and deformations, and any embodied computation or intelligence. Previous research has demonstrated instances of functional complexity, for example microfluidic devices able to perform complex computational tasks. However, there are very few examples of soft microstructures that combine both structural and functional complexity. One example, the “Octobot”, is a two DoF autonomous soft robot fabricated by exploiting a multi-step process combining embedded 3D printing and soft lithography. As this example illustrates, the functional complexity of soft microstructures is limited largely by the chosen fabrication methodology.
Leveraging 2D soft lithographic techniques combined with laser cutting, alignment, and lamination by oxygen plasma bonding, a 2D fabrication process can be used to generate complex 3D soft microstructures. In an embodiment, the process includes spinning coat layers of a soft elastomer casted on a SU-8 patterned silicon wafer, removing them from the wafer, aligning the pattern on a laser and cutting features and shapes. The process further includes selectively bonding multiple layers on top of each other to create a 3D network of predesigned channels, and injecting an uncured material into specific channels to actuate fabrication degrees of freedom. For example, a general workflow for the fabrication technique can include forming layers using soft lithography, aligning and laser cutting the layers, plasma bonding the layers with pin alignment, inflation with PDMS, and curing. Fabrication of multi-layer structures that can form complex 3D shapes can include origami-like folding and sealing of the emerged 3D structure, and complex curved surfaces by exploiting the deformation and/or stretchability of the structure or using continuous folds.
The injection of material into the channels and actuators leads to a change in weight of the device and thus there can be an effect due to gravity. This effect is less in the channels as they are very thin (for example, 40 μm thick), but this effect can be felt in the inflated actuators. Such effect will depend on a variety of factors, including but not limited to the mechanical properties of the material composing the device, the geometry of the structure, and the weight of the fluid injected in the actuators. The entity of the effect of gravity depends also on the structural properties of the injected fluid once cured. If the elastic modulus of the injected fluid, once cured, is larger than the bulk material composing the device the effect of gravity is negligible as the injected cured fluid can act as a sort of endoskeleton which can increase the structural stability of the device.
It is possible to stack multiple soft layers, embedding actuators designed for being injected with a phase-changing material, such as a curable material, as well as actuators for actively moving the structure that emerges after the injection and curing of the uncured material. These structural actuators and functional actuators can be formed in any of the elastomeric layers that make up a microstructure, and can be in separate layers and in the same layers, in any amount and in any combination. Microfluidic circuitry can be embedded in the layers. The use of soft layers allows for the creation of a variety of 3D shapes, from simple joint bending and domes to planes with positive and negative curvatures. Through the fabrication degrees of freedom, complex 3D microstructures analogous to a folding-based assembly of a pop-up MEMS can be generated, but are entirely soft. The actuation degrees of freedom can work in combination with the emerged structure to create soft micro-robots capable of locomotion and manipulation.
The process is inspired by the pop-up book MEMS fabrication process in the sense that it exploits a quasi 2-dimensional process to create 3-dimensional structures. In some embodiments, complex 3D structures can be based on the inflation of channels embedded in the 2D structure. The use of soft materials creates completely new opportunities and advantages: the stretchability of the material and the layers allows for continuous folding and the creation of various structures, for example, obtaining curved planes (for example, in the shape of saddle) out of flat surfaces, the networks of fluidic actuated structures can be embedded in the layers, and there is no need for adhesive as only chemical surface functionalization for bonding the layers is used.
This process addresses the challenge of manufacturing 3D soft microstructures, and the resulting soft microstructures can have a variety of uses. It can also be used to develop bioinspired platforms for replicating and studying biological systems. Devices manufactured with this process can be used for novel 3D microfluidic devices where we can exploit either structural and active degrees of freedom of the structure to obtain new flow control strategies. Microfluidic circuitry can be actuated to control, for example, the exposure of chemicals into the microfluidic channels by actuating the structure containing the channel to lift them up when needed. The process can be used for developing a new class of medical devices that can be deployed in the body and are able to adhere to body structures and release drugs locally.
Various other uses range from microfluidic devices to robotics. As some advantages to these devices include low cost, ease of processing, robustness, and impedance matching with humans and natural environments, opportunities present themselves in medicine, macro- and micro-manipulation, exploration, sensing, and biomimetics. In addition, soft microstructures can take the form of, including but not limited to, microfluidic devices to embody logic circuits, soft microstructures with intricate geometries, and soft microactuators that employ exotic materials and that can respond to diverse stimuli.
The fabrication process described herein can enable the fabrication of soft millimeter scale robots that deliver complex 3D structures out 2D manufacturing approach. Unlike molding and 3D printing technologies, the injection induces self-folding provides flexibility in material selection, and accuracy comparable to soft lithography. In some embodiments, the manufacturing process can be used to fabricate soft micro robots with applications in exploration of hard to reach areas.
As explained above, the fabrication method combines features of laser cutting with soft lithography techniques to allow for the creation of soft microstructures. The ideas of microfluidics and laser machining, which are both purely 2D processes, can be combined to allow for the creation of complex 3D soft structures that can include, in some embodiments, embedded working microfluidic circuitry. This manufacturing process could represent an enabling process for developing soft complex microstructures. With current manufacturing methods it is not possible to embed this level of complexity at this scale. It is also possible to integrate multiscale features, form the centimeter to almost nanometer scale since we are combining the scalability of soft lithography and laser cutting.
Traditional soft actuators can deform in response to a stimulus, including but not limited to pressure change for fluidic actuators and electric field for electroactive materials, and remain in that deformed state for only as long as the input is applied. For instance, a typical bending fluidic actuator is one that is straight under atmospheric pressure, but bends when pressurized. When allowed to depressurize (i.e., when the input is removed), the actuator returns to its initial, undeformed state. In contrast, in some embodiments, elastomeric fluidic actuators can be structurally locked in their deformed states through injection-induced self-folding. Instead of using traditional working fluids such as water or air, phase-changing materials can be used to achieve this behavior. That is, an actuator can be pressurized with a normally fluid material, and then solidify that material, effectively locking the entire structure in its deformed state. For example, UV-curable resin can be used as the phase-changing material, or an uncured form of the bulk elastomer can be used. Using the elastomer precursor can result in a monolithic structure that is entirely soft, and also offers an alternative stimulus for structural locking (i.e., thermal curing rather than UV curing, see supplemental text for additional details). When total recovery of the initial configuration is required, simply using an incompressible fluid (such as water) and closing an input valve would be a viable alternative. While one could inject all microfluidic channels with a phase-changing material that is subsequently solidified, resulting in a 3D, yet entirely static, structure, in some embodiments a combination of working fluids, simultaneously locking some actuators into structural elements, while retaining other actuators to control motion.
There can be a plurality of types of soft micro-actuators. In some embodiments, there can be continuous bending actuators (CBAs), and discrete bending actuators (DBAs). CBAs 30 have a rectangular shaped chamber 32, thus upon pressurization the loading profile along the X direction can be uniform, leading to a continuous bending behavior, as shown in
The microstructures can have a variety of configurations such that the microstructures can self-fold into a variety of structures, which can either self-fold into a temporary or permanent 3D structure depending on the fluid introduced therein. Increasing the dimensionality of soft microstructures is accomplished through injection induced self-folding. In some embodiments shown in
The tolerances of the manufacturing method in terms of minimum achievable cut distance and distortions introduced during the process can be analyzed, and demonstrated minimum cutting distances of 40 μm and misalignment errors down to 4 μm/mm. Thus, there is the possibility of using the laser cut path to define the motion of actuatable sections of the structure (i.e. a soft actuator). The motion of a typical bending actuator is defined by the relative bending stiffnesses of the portions of the actuator above and below the neutral axis. Referring to
To quantify this behavior, visual tracking of various actuators can be performed. The actuators can be manufactured using the same procedure as for the soft layers, for example, that compose the spider, as described in more detail below. Actuators can be fabricated with minimum cut distances ranging from three times the membrane thickness down to the smallest distance that can be fabricated successfully, determined in part by thermal damage effects. The final bend angle is defined as the inverse tangent of the deflection along the z-axis with respect to deflection along the y-axis (
The data is quite spread out within the transition region from out-of-plane to in-plane bending. This can occur, in addition to material irregularities and manufacturing imperfections, due to the hyperelastic nature of the material. As the actuator is pressurized, the thinnest portion (whether that is the membrane defined lithographically or the sidewall defined by laser cutting) can expand to a much larger degree than the rest of the actuator. When the minimum cut path distance is of similar magnitude to the membrane thickness, complex, hybrid motions can be observed in which an actuator can transition from one bending mode to another throughout the course of a single inflation. This behavior can be due to a strain stiffening effect, where the elastic modulus increases with deformation. As such, it is not only the geometry of the actuator but also the time-varying mechanical properties of the material that influences bending motion.
The 2D structures can be built in a variety of ways.
The dimensionality of the soft microstructures can be increased through the injection of a material to induce self-folding of the microstructure. Various materials can be injected, including but not limited to phase-changing materials, such as a curable material. Exemplary materials are shown in
The form and actuation capability of the microstructures can vary widely based on a variety of factors, including but not limited to the number of base and actuator layers, the location and size of the channels formed in the layers, and the complexity of the shape of the structure. In an embodiment shown in
The embodiment of a peacock spider-inspired MORPH system is composed of 12 soft layers. There are two sublaminates (each composed of six soft layers). A first sublaminate is the body sublaminate as shown in
The bonding sequence for the peacock spider is illustrated in
The layers of the microstructure that form the leg portion are shown in more detail in
The layers of the microstructure that form the head and eye portion as shown in
As explained above, the middle sublaminate contains the head and eyes. These layers collectively demonstrate the ability to achieve hierarchical structures, as the eyes are further deformations on an already deformed head. The deformation induced in the head layer leads to a change in the geometry of the channels laying on top of it (
The topmost sublaminate is the abdomen. This sublaminate highlights multiple functionalities, including multi-layer fluid handling of a microfluidic circuit, different colored fluid patterns, and coordinated bending actuation that results in a structure with negative Gaussian curvature. In this structure, the use of laser cutting on top of channels embossed in the soft layers can be used to allow flow across the laminate. Mimicking the behavior of the peacock spider, three sets of independent actuators are responsible for the abdomen movement. As shown in
The layers of the microstructure that form the abdomen portion of the microstructure are also shown in
In some embodiments, visualization layers can have a variety of functions in a microstructure. In some embodiments, one or more visualization layers can add visual aesthetics to a microstructure. For example, on the bioinspiration side, they can mimic to some degree the colorful nature of the exemplary microstructure modeled after a peacock spider (as shown in
When assembled together, the three sublaminates (along with the optional additional layers, such as the visualization layers) make up a full MORPH system composed of 12 layers individually cut and collectively assembled (
Thus, it is possible to form microfluidic channels in one or more layers of a microstructure. The microfluidic circuitry is configured to actively reorient themselves in response to the self-folding of the 2D microstructure into a 3D microstructure. It will be understood that the overall size of the device can vary, along with the number of degrees of freedom and layers thereof depending on the application intended for a microstructure.
While various embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, such embodiments should not be deemed to limit the teaching of this disclosure to those embodiments. Various changes and modifications may be made to the elements and operations described above to obtain a result that remains within the scope of the systems and processes described in this disclosure. All patents, patent applications, and published references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. It will be appreciated that several of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure, as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive and the scope of the presently disclosed embodiments is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the disclosed devices and/or methods.
This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of international PCT application, PCT/US2018/022494, filed Mar. 14, 2018, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/471,134, filed Mar. 14, 2017, the entirety of each are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
This invention was made with government support under FA8650-15-C-7548 awarded by the Department of Defense/Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/022494 | 3/14/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/170170 | 9/20/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3387305 | Shafer | Jun 1968 | A |
3411511 | Marino | Nov 1968 | A |
3831467 | Moore | Aug 1974 | A |
4023215 | Moore | May 1977 | A |
4252112 | Joyce | Feb 1981 | A |
4370977 | Mauldin et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4682776 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4697808 | Larson et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4724827 | Schenck | Feb 1988 | A |
4760850 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
5020790 | Beard et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5282460 | Boldt | Feb 1994 | A |
5485402 | Smith et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5584799 | Gray | Dec 1996 | A |
5599283 | Lindenmeyer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5667461 | Hall | Sep 1997 | A |
5826578 | Curchod | Oct 1998 | A |
5865714 | Marlowe | Feb 1999 | A |
5865770 | Schectman | Feb 1999 | A |
5955667 | Fyfe | Sep 1999 | A |
6123649 | Lee et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129691 | Ruppert | Oct 2000 | A |
6168634 | Schmitz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6213922 | Afanasenko et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6500138 | Irby et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517503 | Naft et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6633783 | Dariush et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635024 | Hatton et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6666831 | Edgerton et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6689075 | West | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6741911 | Simmons | May 2004 | B2 |
6783555 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790165 | Huang | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796926 | Reinkensmeyer et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812624 | Pei et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6955692 | Grundei | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6989669 | Low et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7034432 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7034527 | Low et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7049732 | Pei et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056297 | Dohno et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064472 | Pelrine et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7090650 | Ou et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7153242 | Goffer | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153246 | Koscielny et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166953 | Heim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190141 | Ashrafiuon et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7199501 | Pei et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211937 | Kornbluh et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224106 | Pei et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7229390 | Fujii et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233097 | Rosenthal et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7252644 | Dewald et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259503 | Pei et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259553 | Arns, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7307418 | Low et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7331906 | He et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341295 | Veatch et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7355519 | Grold et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367958 | McBean et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7368862 | Pelrine et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7378878 | Pelrine et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7390309 | Dariush | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7410471 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7411332 | Kornbluh et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7429253 | Shimada et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7436099 | Pei et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445606 | Rastegar et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456549 | Heim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7476185 | Drennan | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7494450 | Solomon | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7521840 | Heim | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521847 | Heim | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7537573 | Horst | May 2009 | B2 |
7549969 | van Den Bogert | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7567681 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578799 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7595580 | Heim | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598651 | Kornbluh et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7598652 | Kornbluh et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7626319 | Heim | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650204 | Dariush | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7652386 | Donelan et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7654973 | Firsov | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7679267 | Heim | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7684896 | Dariush | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7705521 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7737685 | Low et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750532 | Heim | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758481 | Drennan | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774177 | Dariush | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775999 | Brown | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785279 | Sankai | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785656 | Pei et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787646 | Pelrine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7804227 | Pelrine et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7857774 | Sankai | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7860562 | Endo et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7883546 | Kazerooni et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887471 | McSorley | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7897168 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7911761 | Biggs et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7915790 | Heim et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918808 | Simmons | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7921541 | Pei et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7923064 | Pelrien et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7923902 | Heim | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7947004 | Kazerooni et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7952261 | Lipton et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7977923 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981508 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7985193 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990022 | Heim | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7998040 | Kram et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8048007 | Roy | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057410 | Angold et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8058861 | Pelrine et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060337 | Kulach et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075633 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083644 | Purdy et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096965 | Goffer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114034 | Ikeuchi et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8125755 | Garcia et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8127437 | Lipton et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142370 | Weinberg et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147436 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8164232 | Kornbluh et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8183739 | Heim | May 2012 | B2 |
8222799 | Polyakov et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231687 | Bedard et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235869 | Rastegar et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8246559 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8248750 | Biggs et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8274244 | Horst et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8283839 | Heim | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8287477 | Herr et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8292836 | Matsuoka et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299634 | Donelan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311623 | Sanger | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316526 | Pei et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316719 | Majidi et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323355 | Latour | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8325458 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348875 | Goffer et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8376971 | Herr et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8409117 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8436508 | Kornbluh et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8438757 | Roser | May 2013 | B2 |
8460001 | Chuang | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8467904 | Dariush | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8488295 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8508109 | Pelrine et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8551029 | Herr et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8551184 | Herr | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8562691 | Endo et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8564926 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573982 | Chuang | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8585620 | McBean et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597369 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608479 | Liu | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608674 | Krebs et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622938 | Sankai | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8663133 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8665578 | Pelrine et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8679575 | Biggs et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8715208 | Hodgins et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8764850 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8766925 | Perlin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8773148 | Sankai et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8847611 | Ulmen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8905955 | Goffer et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8920517 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8926534 | McBean et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8938289 | Einav et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961439 | Yang et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8975888 | Pelrine et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8981621 | Pelrine et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986233 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9044346 | Langlois et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9072941 | Duda et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9101323 | Einarsson et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9144528 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149370 | Herr et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9195794 | Dariush | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9198821 | Unluhisarcikli et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9221177 | Herr et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9227108 | Chuang | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9228822 | Majidi et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9231186 | Büsgen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9266233 | Kornbluh et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9333097 | Herr et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351900 | Walsh et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9387096 | Sverrisson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9403272 | Kornbluh et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9427864 | Kornbluh et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
10028881 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10115319 | Walsh et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10278883 | Walsh et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10427293 | Asbeck et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10434030 | Asbeck et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
20010007845 | Afanasenko et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030009120 | MacAllister | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030397 | Simmons | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030064869 | Reinkensmeyer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030092545 | Koscielny et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030096310 | Hansen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120183 | Simmons | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125781 | Dohno et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040043879 | Huang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064195 | Herr | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087418 | Eldridge | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106881 | McBean et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116260 | Drennan | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147378 | Conklin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040191321 | Guan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204294 | Wilkinson et al. | Oct 2004 | A2 |
20050010150 | Firsov | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049865 | Yaxin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070834 | Herr et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050101448 | He et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107725 | Wild et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157893 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184878 | Grold et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050288157 | Santos-Munne et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060079817 | Dewald et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108755 | Smyler et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136206 | Ariu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060192465 | Kornbluh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249315 | Herr et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070004570 | Afanasenko et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070004571 | Gonzalez | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070066918 | Dewald et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070111868 | Fujii et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123997 | Herr et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135279 | Purdy et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070276270 | Tran | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080000317 | Patton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039756 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062589 | Drabing | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071386 | McBean et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075930 | Kornbluh et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097269 | Weinberg et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080156363 | Ikeuchi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080173365 | Unger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080218132 | Pelrine et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224564 | Pelrine et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255488 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289952 | Pelrine et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294019 | Tran | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300118 | Wehrell | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090042702 | Toronto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090221928 | Einav et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090255531 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256817 | Perlin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090306548 | Bhugra et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090311190 | Gracias | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319054 | Sankai | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000547 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100007240 | Kornbluh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100024180 | Pei et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100026143 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030343 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038983 | Bhugra et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056966 | Toth | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100144490 | Purdy et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152630 | Matsuoka et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185259 | Shiba et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185301 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204804 | Garrec | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100271051 | Sankai et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274364 | Pacanowsky et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280628 | Sankai | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286796 | Clausen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295417 | Wood | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298834 | Hildebrandt | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100319215 | Roser | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324698 | Sverrisson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004322 | Sankai | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009793 | Lucero et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022349 | Kulach et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025170 | Rosenthal et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033835 | Endo et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040216 | Herr et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110062948 | Arns, Jr. et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071647 | Mahon | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093089 | Martin | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110105966 | Kazerooni et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110150966 | Chen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152696 | Ryan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154641 | Pelrine et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110155307 | Pelrine et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174524 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193362 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201978 | Jeon et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209337 | Pei et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245738 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282255 | Nace | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295384 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295385 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313331 | Dehez et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120019223 | Pelrine et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023638 | Leicester | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056903 | Shinohara et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071797 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120100286 | Sharma et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109031 | Vollbrecht | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120544 | Pelrine et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120128960 | Busgen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165709 | Goffer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169184 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120177934 | Vogel et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179075 | Perry et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120181896 | Kornbluh et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185052 | Lefeber | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209152 | Cordo | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216672 | Menon | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238914 | Goldfield et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120248942 | Biggs et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120253234 | Yang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271207 | Schoen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120279175 | Biggs et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289870 | Hsiao-Wecksler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330198 | Patoglu | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013085 | Smith et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019749 | Hufton et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130040783 | Duda et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041617 | Pease et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130045530 | Gracias et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058001 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079686 | Sessions | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130093439 | Ulmen et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102935 | Kazerooni et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130123672 | Goffer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130130866 | Wehrell | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131555 | Hook | May 2013 | A1 |
20130158444 | Herr et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165817 | Horst et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179154 | Okuno | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186699 | Prahlad et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130211295 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225371 | Harrer et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226048 | Unluhisarcikli et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130230667 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130237884 | Kazerooni et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245512 | Goffer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253385 | Goffer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261513 | Goffer et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130261766 | Langlois et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268256 | Dariush | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274640 | Butters et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130288863 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289452 | Smith et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296746 | Herr et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307370 | Jenninger et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310979 | Herr et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312541 | Majidi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130328440 | Kornbluh et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140046455 | Herr et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140194781 | Einarsson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140202628 | Sreetharan | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213951 | Pietrusisnki et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140277739 | Kornbluh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140358040 | Kim et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150099945 | Hawkins, III et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150142130 | Goldfarb et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150173993 | Walsh et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150266180 | Kornbluh et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150266181 | Kornbluh et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297934 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150298765 | Golden, Jr. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150321339 | Asbeck et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150321399 | Hong et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160346156 | Walsh et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160101516 | Kornbluh et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160101517 | Kornbluh et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107309 | Walsh et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160220438 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160278948 | Piercy et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160284231 | Walsh et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170027735 | Walsh et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170163435 | Ehsani et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170176167 | Keller et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170202724 | De Rossi et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180008502 | Asbeck et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180056104 | Cromie et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180354120 | Diller | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180370020 | Murakami et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190008714 | Murakami et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190021933 | Murakami et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190029912 | Murakami et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190060156 | Swift et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190060157 | Lamb et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190070062 | O'Donnell et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190077071 | Ware | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190159662 | Papas | May 2019 | A1 |
20200079643 | Bartlett | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200224784 | Hasan | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1431084 | Jul 2003 | CN |
1868434 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101175456 | May 2008 | CN |
102327173 | Jan 2012 | CN |
202342034 | Jul 2012 | CN |
19944139 | Apr 2001 | DE |
0 016 268 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0 141 640 | May 1985 | EP |
0 302 148 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0 509 723 | Oct 1992 | EP |
1 260 201 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1 306 792 | May 2003 | EP |
1 324 403 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1 550 689 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1 589 059 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1 842 518 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2 226 053 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 497 610 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2 548 543 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2 649 976 | Oct 2013 | EP |
H07-163607 | Jun 1995 | JP |
2002-301124 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2005-000500 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2007-000391 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2008-067762 | Mar 2008 | JP |
4345025 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010-042069 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010-051416 | Mar 2010 | JP |
4424269 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010-075656 | Apr 2010 | JP |
4582523 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2011-036375 | Feb 2011 | JP |
4848260 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012-192013 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2013-146328 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013-208397 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2014-018536 | Feb 2014 | JP |
WO 0012041 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 2004017890 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004039292 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004047928 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005102208 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2011008934 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011026086 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011030641 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011126985 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2012014164 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2012050938 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012103073 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012124328 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012178171 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO 2013019749 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO 2013033669 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2013044226 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2013049658 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013146231 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014034145 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2014109799 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO 2014194257 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2015074070 | May 2015 | WO |
WO 2015088863 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2015120186 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2015157731 | Oct 2015 | WO |
WO 2016044251 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2016089466 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO 2017040669 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 2017160751 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO 2018017436 | Jan 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems Sep. 25-30, 2011. San Francisco, CA, USA (Year: 2011). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/097,744, filed Apr. 13, 2016, Asbeck et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/102,694, filed Mar. 31, 2017, De Rossi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/893,934, filed Nov. 24, 2015, Walsh et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,746, filed Aug. 12, 2019, Asbeck et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/317,845, filed Jan. 15, 2019, Ding et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/302,347, filed Oct. 6, 2016, Walsh et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/084,377, filed Sep. 12, 2018, O'Donnell et al. |
PCT/US2013/060225, May 27, 2014, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2019/033143, Oct. 9, 2019, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2014/068462, May 22, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2014/040340, Oct. 31, 2014, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2015/051107, Aug. 5, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2017/042286, Sep. 28, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2018/022494, Jun. 8, 2018, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2015/014672, Jul. 6, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2015/025472, Sep. 4, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2017/022150, Jun. 9, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2003/012123, dated Jun. 22, 2004. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2016/049706, dated Nov. 29, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/060225, dated May 27, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/033143, dated Oct. 9, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/068462, dated May 22, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/040340, dated Oct. 31, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2015/051107, dated Aug. 5, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/042286, dated Sep. 28, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/022494, dated Jun. 8, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/014672, dated Jul. 6, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/025472, dated Sep. 4, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2017/022150, dated Jun. 9, 2017. |
[No Author Listed], Development of a strategic Master Plan for the transformation of the traditional textile and clothing into a knowledge driven industrial sector by 2015; Report on Intelligent Textiles; State of the art. Clevertex. dated prior to Jul. 2014; 160 pages. |
Bae et al, A Soft Exosuit for Patients with Stroke: Feasibility study with a mobile off-board actuation unit. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). Aug. 11, 2015 ; 131-8. |
Banala et al., Active leg exoskeleton (alex) for gait rehabilitation of motor-impaired patients. Proc. In 2007 IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robotics. Jun. 13, 2007; 401-7. |
Browning et al., The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of waling. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. Mar. 1, 2007; 39(3): 515-25. |
Cho et al, Eds., Smart Clothing Technology and Applications. Human Factors and Ergonomics. CRC Press. 2010; 290 pages. |
Chu et al., On the biomimetic design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). In IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Barcelona, Spain. Apr. 2005 ; 4345-52. |
Collins et al., Efficient Bipedal Robots Based on Passive-Dynamic Walkers. Science, Feb. 2005; 307(5712): 1082-1085. |
Cool, Biomechanics of orthoses for the subluxed shoulder. Prosthetics & Orthotics International. Jan. 1, 1989;13(2):90-6. |
Da Silva et al., FBG Sensing Glove for Monitoring Hand Posture. Sensors Journal. Apr. 5, 2011; 11(10): 2442-8. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/absall.jsp?arnumber=5742669. |
De Rossi et al., Wearable technology for biomechanics: e-textile or micromechanical sensors? IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine. May-Jun. 2010; 29(3): 37-43. [Online]. Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20659856. |
Delp et al., OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. Oct. 22, 2007; 54(11): 1940-50. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18018689. |
Dollar et al., Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: Challenges and state-of-the-art. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on Robotics. Feb. 25, 2008; 24(1): 144-58. |
Erk et al., Strain stiffening in synthetic and biopolymer networks. Biomacromolecules. Apr. 14, 2010; 11(5): 1358-63. |
Farris et al., Human medial gastrocnemius force-velocity behavior shifts with locomotion speed and gait. Proc Natl Acad. Sci U S A. Jan. 17, 2012;109(3):977-982. |
Ferris et al., A Physiologist's Perspective on Robotic Exoskeletons for Human Locomotion. Int J HR. Sep. 4, 2007 4(3): 507-28. |
Ferris et al., Robotic lower limb exoskeletons using proportional myoelectric control. In EMBC 2009, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Sep. 3, 2009; 2119-24. |
Fonseca, Validation of two types of textile electrodes for electrocardiography and electromyography measurement applications. Dissertation submitted to Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto. Jul. 2012; 126 pages. |
Ghodsi et al., De novo Likelihood-based measures for comparing genome assemblies. In: BMC Research Noles. Dec. 2013; 6(1):334.—online retrieved on Oct. 25, 2016. |
Gibbs et al., Wearable Conductive Fiber Sensors for Multi-Axis Human Joint Angle Measurements. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. Dec. 2005;2(1):7. |
Goodvin, Development of a Real-time Spinal Motion Inertial Measurement System for Vestibular Disorder Application. Thesis submitted to University of Victoria. 2003; 155 pages. |
Gregorczyk et al., The effects of a lower body exoskeleton load carriage assistive device on oxygen consumption and kinematics during walking with loads. In 25th Army Sci. Conf., Florida, USA. Nov. 1, 2006. |
Hallemans et al., 3D joint dynamics of walking in toddlers. A cross-sectional study spanning the first rapid development phase of walking. Gait & Posture. Oct. 1, 2005; 22(2):107-118. |
Kadaba et al., Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society. May 1990; 8(3): 383-92. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2324857. |
Kawamoto et al., Power assist method for HAL-3 using EMG-based feedback controller. in Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003. IEEE International Conference on Oct. 8, 2003; 2:1648-53. |
Kim et al., Epidermal electronics. Science. Aug. 12, 2011; 333( 6044): 838-43. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1206157. |
Kramer et al., Soft curvature sensors for joint angle proprioception. In 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Sep. 25, 2011; 1919-26. [Online]. Available:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6094701. |
Kramer et al., Wearable tactile keypad with stretchable artificial skin. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. May 9, 2011; 1103-7. [Online]. Available:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5980082. |
Kulyukin, Ed., Advances in Human-Robot Interaction. In-Teh. Dec. 2009; 354 pages. |
Laughton et al., Effect of Strike Pattern and Orthotic Intervention on Tibial Shock During Running. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. May 1, 2003; 19(2): 153-68. |
Lee et al., Biomimetic Approach Enables Functional Movements of Hand Post Stroke: A Pilot Study. Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Society. 2012; 2 pages. |
Lenhart et al., Increasing Running Step Rate Reduces Patellofemoral Joint Forces. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Mar. 2014; 46(3): 557-64. |
Lieberman et al., Effects of stride frequency and foot position in landing on braking force, hip torque, impact peak force and the metabolic cost of running in humans. Journal of Experimental Biology. Nov. 1, 2015; 218(21):3406-14. |
Lipomi et al., Skin-like pressure and strain sensors based on transparent elastic films of carbon nanotubes. Nature nanotechnology. Dec. 2011; 6(12): 788-92. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22020121. |
Majidi et al., A non-differential elastomer curvature sensor for softer-than-skin electronics. Smart Materials and Structures. Aug. 31, 2011; 20(10): 105017. [Online]. Available: http://stacks.iop.org/0964-1726/20/i=10/a=105017?key=crossref.0cca7e97d6a-d7110bcdcaf45f30f3b60. |
Malcolm et al., Fast Exoskeleton Optimization. Science. Jun. 23, 2017; 356(6344): 1230-1. |
Mattila, Ed., Intelligent textiles and clothing. Woodhead Publishing Limited. 2006; 525 pages. |
Mcgeer, Passive Bipedal Running. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. May 22, 1990; 240(1297): 107-134. |
Newman et al., Astronauth Bio-Suit System to enable planetary exploration. In International Astronautical Conference. Vancouver, Canada. Oct. 2004. |
Park et al., Active Modular Elastomer Sleeve for Soft Wearable Assistance Robots, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Con. on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal. Oct. 7, 2012; 1595-1602. |
Park et al., Bio-inspired Active Soft Orthotic Device for Ankle Foot Pathologies. 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Francisco, CA, USA. Sep. 25, 2011; 4488-95. |
Park et al., Design and Fabrication of Soft Artificial Skin Using Embedded Microchannels and Liquid Conductors. IEEE Sensors Journal. May 22, 2012; 12(8): 2711-8. [Online]. Available:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6203551. |
Park et al., Hyperelastic pressure sensing with a liquid-embedded elastomer. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. Nov. 29, 2010; 20(12): 125029. [Online]. |
Available: http://stacks.iop.org/0960-1317/20/i=12/a=125029?key=crossref.84cffc44789-ba7bde0bdfd169e25af91. |
Polonen et al., Automatic Intensity Quantification of Fluorescence Targets from microscope Images with Maximum Likelihood Estimation. 17th European Signal Processing Conference. Aug. 24, 2009; 1072-6.—retrieved online Oct. 25, 2016. |
Pratt et al., The RoboKnee: An exoskeleton for enhancing strength and endurance during walking. in IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA). New Orleans, USA. Apr. 26, 2004; 3: 2430-5. |
Quintero et al., Control and Implementation of a Powered Lower Limb Orthosis to Aid Walking in Paraplegic Individuals. in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Jun. 29, 2011; 6 pages. |
Ramuz et al., Transparent, Optical, Pressure-Sensitive Artificial Skin for Large-Area Stretchable Electronics. Advanced Materials. Jun. 26, 2012; 24(24):3223-7. [Online] Available:http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/adma.201200523. |
Reid et al., Biomechanical assessment of rucksack shoulder strap attachment location: effect on load distribution to the torso. RTO HFM Specialists Meeting on Soldier Mobility: Innovations in Load Carriage System Design and Evaluation. NATO-RTO Meeting Proceedings: MP-056 (Neuilly-sur Seine: NATO). Jun. 2000; 9 pages. |
Royer et al., Manipulations of Leg Mass and Moment of Inertia: Effects on Energy Cost of Walking. Medicine & Science. in Sports & Exercise. Apr. 1, 2005; 37(4): 649-656. |
Schiele, Ergonomics of Exoskeletons: Objective Performance Metrics. in Euro Haptics conference on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environmental Teleoperator Systems. Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Mar. 18, 2009: 103-8. |
Scilingo et al., Strain-sensing fabrics for wearable kinaesthetic-like systems. IEEE Sensors Journal. Sep. 4, 2003; 3(4): 460-7. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1226639. |
Silva et al., Wireless Hydrotherapy Smart-Suit Network for Posture Monitoring. 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics. Jun. 2007; 2713-7. |
Sinclair et al., Determination of Gait Events Using an Externally Mounted Shank Accelerometer. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. Feb. 1, 2013; 29(1): 118-22. |
Strauser et al., The development and testing of a human machine interface for a mobile medical exoskeleton. In IEEE Int Conf, Intelligent Robots and Systems. San. CA USA. Sep. 25, 2011 ; 4911-6. |
Tesconi et al., Wearable sensorized system for analyzing the lower limb movement during rowing activity. 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics. Jun. 4, 2007; 2793-6. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4375052. |
Tiwana et al., A review of tactile sensing technologies with applications in biomedical engineering. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. Jun. 1, 2012; 179: 17-31. [Online]. Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924424712001641. |
Vogt et al., Design and Characterization of a Soft Multi-Axis Force Sensor Using Embedded Microfluidic Channels. IEE Sensors Journal. Jul. 4, 2013; 13(10): 4056-64. |
Walsh et al., Quasi-Passive Leg Exoskeleton for Load Carrying Augmentation. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, Special Issue: Active Exoskeletons. Sep. 2007; 4(3): 487-506. |
Wehner et al., Experimental characterization of components for active soft orthotics. in Submitted in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Biomed. Rob. Biomechatron. Roma, Italy. Jun. 24, 2012; 1586-92. |
Wehner et al., Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Reduces Back Forces in Lifting. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. Hollywood, California, USA. Oct. 12, 2009; 49-56. |
Wehner, Man to Machine, Applications in Electromyography. In: EMG Methods for Evaluation Muscle and Nerve Functions. Jan. 2012 Schwartz, Ed.. Chapter 22: 29 pages. |
Woodman, An introduction to inertial navigation. University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory Technical Report UCAM-CL-TR-696. Aug. 2007; 37 pages. |
Yamada et al., A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection. Nature nanotechnology. May 2011; 6(5): 296-301. [Online] Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21441912. |
Zhang et al., Carbon nanotube polymer coatings for textile yarns with good strain sensing capability. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. Jun. 2012; 179: 83-91. [Online]. Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924424712001938. |
Zhang et al., Human-in-the-Loop Optimization of Exoskeleton Assistance During Walking. Science. Jun. 23, 2017; 356(6344): 1280-4. |
Zoss et al., Biomechanical deign of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). Mechatronics, IEE/ASME Transactions on. Apr. 10, 2006; 11(2): 128-138. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200079643 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62471134 | Mar 2017 | US |